Heinrich Kühn

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лип 2024
  • theartofphotography.tv/episode...
    / tedforbes
    / tedforbes
    Heinrich Kühn was one of the earliest color photographers. Working from Austria he was one of the most notable European Pictorialists of the early 20th century, working in his quest for the Perfect Photograph.
    Working most notably using the early Autochrome process, Kühn became an early master as a color practitioner. His work was ahead of its time and still quite relevant today despite the crude nature of process, chemicals and materials available during his lifetime.
    Kühn was notable both as a scientist and an artist. His polymath nature landed him a special place in the history of photography.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 64

  • @snoek1971
    @snoek1971 9 років тому +35

    You do such a wonderful job by showing us all these amazing photographers....thanks Ted!

  • @mafe123ish
    @mafe123ish 8 років тому +35

    This episode helped me conceptualize a thought I already had in the back of my head. For a young person like me (19 y/o) this kind of episode is just mind blowing... I am almost sad to live in a time when everything is simply handed to us and we don't really have acknowledge or any relationship with the process so it is less likely for us to appreciate it. Thank you Ted for showing us this kind of work in your channel, hopefully more people will start to appreciate what they do and the tools they have to make it so.

    • @Bolton115
      @Bolton115 4 роки тому +1

      OTOH.. back when film was expensive and a somewhat current camera was out of reach for a kid like me who grew up working class poor in the 1980s.. modern day tools are cheap and accessible: an 8 year old laptop and $200 used digital camera can do things that I couldn't have done with a rented (high end for its time) SLR and full dark room facilities back in college..
      Just because you didn't have to mow lawns or work in a tire shop to afford the limited toolset available back when I was 19, doesn't mean that the work you produce on your iPad is any less relevant for its time, which is today.
      Technology has greatly democratized the photographic hobby, for good or bad. I can still recall shots that I could have easily made with what I have today versus what I didn't have then-and if I were 19 today I could afford the modern day tools to do so!

    • @inevitablecraftslab
      @inevitablecraftslab 4 роки тому

      i think its just the opposite.
      when i was a kid, i dreamed about 35mm nikons that where WAY out of reach for me.
      30 years later, i own a hasselblad, a Nikon F3, a bronica ETRSi for everyday use and for all of this i paid less than for a prosumer DSLR.
      I think we are in glorious times :)

    • @Bolton115
      @Bolton115 4 роки тому

      @@lisaw150 My Fuji cameras get frequent "Ooh, is that a film camera?" comments. Especially the leather case clad X-E1 with a smaller lens, looks to the untrained eye like a film Leica.
      Still though, point taken. No one mistakes a Sony for a film camera.

    • @mjoelnir58
      @mjoelnir58 3 роки тому +1

      @@Bolton115 On the other hand:film is expensive again.

    • @Bolton115
      @Bolton115 3 роки тому

      @@mjoelnir58 It isn't the film which is expensive, it's the scanning into digital. Especially with medium format-it's a joy to shoot, fun to develop, but time consuming or expensive to get it scanned.

  • @wieland00
    @wieland00 7 років тому +8

    He might be the inventor of HDR photography. He developed a process with two emulsions of different sensitivities on one glass plate. The result was a much larger range of tonality than what was available via the standard glass plate of that time.
    His family was not poor. He could dedicate himself to photography and science and experimenting. His family had invested most of their money in war bonds. That meant that they were poor by the end of WW1. It probably explains why things about Heinrich went quiet after that time.

  • @CrunchyPopZ
    @CrunchyPopZ 3 роки тому +1

    Autochrome photographs feel like I'm looking at someone's memories inside their head. What a beautifully warm and haunting style.

  • @mattayers3794
    @mattayers3794 9 років тому +7

    I find it amazing they have not been able to recreate the quality of the Lumiere brand of autochrome plates to this day.A book I would suggest is "The Lumiere Autochrome:History,Technology and Preservation".A wonderful book with detailed discussions involving the technology and history of the process.Also includes several portfolios of photographs made using the autochrome process.About the cheapest I found it was on Amazon.

  • @arfuzzy0803
    @arfuzzy0803 7 років тому +2

    I've always loved older film photography and have a huge respect for the process, but this work is inspiring on a whole new level.

  • @michaelangeloh.5383
    @michaelangeloh.5383 5 років тому +2

    8:30 It's like looking at a picture from an early 2000s camera-phone or P&S digital camera or something. Because the noise reminds me of digital noise, as opposed to film-grain. - Also, the process of autochrome, as it's described, reminds me of digital sensors and displays and such.
    It's kinda like we started all over again...

  • @majopgalli
    @majopgalli 8 років тому +1

    I loved this episode Ted!! thanks a lot for introducing us to this artist!!

  • @avs4365
    @avs4365 5 років тому

    Many thanks for this illuminating video. Trying, even at my late age to discover the history of the progression of photography, and, without doubt, you really bring the subject alive, Bravo!

  • @RR-bd4bm
    @RR-bd4bm 7 років тому +1

    Incredible stuff Ted, keep up the good work and many thanks!

  • @NPJensen
    @NPJensen 4 роки тому +1

    So Ted, you mention in this video, that Kühn's work after 1918 is difficult to find. Researching Kühn online, I find it interesting, that he had invested his fortune in war bonds and lost it 1918 with the end of WW1.
    I'm guessing, there is a connection there.
    Anyway, you made these videos to last... Very interesting!

  • @Kleinbiology
    @Kleinbiology 9 років тому

    There is so much to be leaned from those who came before. Thanks Ted!

  • @user-gf5vf1bs7n
    @user-gf5vf1bs7n 7 років тому

    I'm very glad that I came across with your channel, I really enjoy it, you are doing a very important work and I believe that everyone interested in photography should know its history...!!
    Thanks!!

  • @LorenzoScarafia
    @LorenzoScarafia 3 роки тому

    Thank you Ted Forbes! Your job is timeless

  • @thovennep8223
    @thovennep8223 9 років тому +7

    You're a born teacher. Great!

  • @TooFarWest1
    @TooFarWest1 9 років тому

    Thanks for the ongoing education, Ted. Wonderful stuff.

  • @missmitsi1
    @missmitsi1 8 років тому

    Really enjoy your videos & way you present Thanks for sharing them to all us 'Togs' ..young and old!

  • @neshiah4747
    @neshiah4747 7 років тому

    Great lectures Ted. Packed with really useful information of degree level quality.

  • @ObservingBeauty
    @ObservingBeauty 3 роки тому

    your passion is contagious. well done

  • @vproven
    @vproven 4 роки тому

    Outstanding log. So detailed and informative.

  • @AuthenticSound
    @AuthenticSound 9 років тому

    Ted, this is a perfect episode, thanks and congratulations, I'm really impressed with how you are able to lift the AOP to the different level you're looking for!

  • @ronvermeeren1347
    @ronvermeeren1347 6 років тому

    Great end line, learn to smell the Roses again... have a nice weekend.

  • @clfall
    @clfall 9 років тому

    Another terrific episode!

  • @marieanderson3367
    @marieanderson3367 5 років тому

    Informative and interesting video. Thank you Ted!

  • @tasulatrakha3012
    @tasulatrakha3012 6 років тому

    you are such a wonderful art teacher

  • @garyrobinson8665
    @garyrobinson8665 7 років тому

    Great video. You inspired me to buy this book. I got it for a reasonable price. I love it. Was worth every penny. Beautiful work.

  • @CandidCountry
    @CandidCountry 9 років тому

    Hey Ted! This is a fantastic presentation! The material is so interesting and I loved the in depth discussion. My only gripe would be the white of the book is overexposed, but this is just a minor detail. Fantastic video!

  • @lewisallrightsreserved7879
    @lewisallrightsreserved7879 7 років тому

    Superb episode on an under appreciated photographer! Have you considered doing episodes on Ralph Eugene Meatyard, Paul Outerbridge, Francesca Woodman, or Ansel Adams' portraiture and Kodachrome work? Other under appreciated names that spring to mind not brain are Jerome Ducrot (excellent '60s fashion photographer - I believe Richard Kalvar (spelling?) was his assistant), Bob Carlos Clark(e), David Hamilton, Gertrude Kasebier, Clarence White, David Hockney, Harry Callahan, and Stanley Kubrick (yes, thatvStanley Kubrick, before he was a filmmaker he was a photographer), there are many more - sorry if any of these are duplications of photographers you've already done., I haven't been through your whole repertoire of episodes yet...

  • @jeanniebottle1
    @jeanniebottle1 9 років тому

    Fascinating, thank you

  • @BangYan
    @BangYan 8 років тому +1

    You're great.... Thank you

  • @Mr_Townsend
    @Mr_Townsend 5 років тому

    “He was way ahead of his time”
    Every time 😂

  • @steveb2145
    @steveb2145 3 роки тому

    refreshing in the digital age....yes,,we need to smell the roses !!

  • @jaza4805
    @jaza4805 9 років тому +1

    Thanks for this episode, really enjoyed it. It brings to my mind a question: "Is Holography an art?" It is so similar to autochrome process: it is a unique image (can't be copyied using current technology), can't be printed, it is still experimental, tight connected with science and experimentation. Any chance you look into this?

  • @joyce-ux7ec
    @joyce-ux7ec 6 років тому

    I kanda want that crude color!

  • @steveg8322
    @steveg8322 7 років тому

    Other than the use of the word 'crude ' in several instantces, where prototypical or even primitive in the strictest sense of that word would to me at least been better,an excellent vid. Don't mean to nit pick but what may seem so to us must have been quite astonishing to the people of that era.Your passion shows,just recently found your channel,enjoy immensely.

  • @ThunderApache1604V
    @ThunderApache1604V 6 років тому

    You mentioned Gaussian distribution.... I mean I am amazed that how much of knowledge you have.... You're a photographer, you used to be a museum ceuretor, a musician.... I am amazed :-) ....

  • @rogerrtewwr4723
    @rogerrtewwr4723 4 роки тому

    where's the pic from the thumbnail though

  • @brianjrichman
    @brianjrichman 9 років тому

    To comment on your closing remarks when you closed his book, the "Slow Photography Movement" is alive and well... I am a founding member of a film only Facebook collective group with 700+ members... These things are not gone yet!

  • @robertopagliari7585
    @robertopagliari7585 7 років тому

    off topic, but I noticed that you say "okay" less often than you used to :)

  • @laurencegoldman4639
    @laurencegoldman4639 4 роки тому

    Let’s not forget DEGAS, RENOIR, SEURAT, et. al. from whence his aesthetic arises. These images don’t just appear in a vacuum.

  • @Sharkiemark1968
    @Sharkiemark1968 9 років тому +2

    Thanks Ted Heinrich Kuhn is someone im going to check out a bit more, The whole Autochrome process blew my mind when i first found out about it a number of years ago, not sure why as i knew colour photography was nearly as old as Photography full stop, but i think it's the fact we are so used to seeing the early 20th century Edwardian world in B&W when you see it in colour it becomes almost 21th century, Someone that impressed me was Mervyn O’Gorman and his autochromes taken near near Lulworth Cove in Dorset sometime cira 1913
    phototechnology2011id.wordpress.com/2011/12/12/autochrome-lumiere-by-mervyn-ogorman/

    • @theartofphotography
      @theartofphotography  9 років тому

      Mark Donohue Beautiful stuff! Would have been right after Kühn - love it!

  • @GeraldMoncrief
    @GeraldMoncrief 9 років тому

    The only thing that really dates his photo is the clothing at least as shown on video. I am really glad I came across this video I need something to feed my curiosity about the true masters of photography.

  • @oliveribasta5929
    @oliveribasta5929 9 років тому

    Wow

  • @luisboaventura22
    @luisboaventura22 3 роки тому

    👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @rogerrtewwr4723
    @rogerrtewwr4723 4 роки тому +1

    21:18 that one is interesting, too bad they printed it across a damn fold

  • @jonrendell
    @jonrendell 4 роки тому

    Take a breath!

  • @brianjrichman
    @brianjrichman 9 років тому

    Ted, The cheapest that Amazon has it for is over $80 ... OUCH!

    • @theartofphotography
      @theartofphotography  9 років тому

      Brian Richman yeah not a fan of Amazon for used books. Powells and Ebay might be a better bet. Dude - you're in Dallas - keep an eye out at Half Price Books or Recycled up in Denton.

    • @brianjrichman
      @brianjrichman 9 років тому

      NOOOOOO!!!!!! Not *IN* the actual bookstores themselves. My credit card is badly bent out of shape as it is!!! I'd be bankrupt in 10 minutes... "Must get this one", "Only one more", "Is THAT all it costs?", "How much?", "I can just afford that last book". This is the path to ruin!

    • @theartofphotography
      @theartofphotography  9 років тому +7

      Brian Richman Yeah - beware of the "Law of Used Bookstores". It states 1) If you're looking for something you won't find anything and 2) If you're just browsing you'll be broke by the time you leave. ;-)

    • @mjoelnir58
      @mjoelnir58 3 роки тому

      And now it is about 150 to 200 euros.And not only at amazon, everywhere.

  • @jamesgjurovich7893
    @jamesgjurovich7893 2 роки тому

    Amazon used 365 dollars

  • @nicholasberardo4699
    @nicholasberardo4699 6 років тому +1

    too much talk too little looking