Last chance to get a patch featuring the insignia of the 1077th Tank Regiment & Antares Confederacy emblem pin! | www.patreon.com/templininstitute (Offer ends Nov 23rd) Get a poster featuring the most famous variants of the UC-67! | shop.templin.institute/collections/antares-confederacy/products/uc-67-mistaya-variants-antares-confederacy-poster
How they wrote this "Shuttle" reminds me of the Warhog of the UNSC. A simple vehicle that has grown with the nation and has become a symbol inof itself
I know you missed the the "t" in warthog. But now I'm invisoning a armored more modern war version of a warthog simply called "Warhog" a spartan version of the venerable IFV of the unsc with shields and a badass minigun style of a gauss cannon
I think it fits more in line with the Pelican. The pelican is used for the same thing, is equally modular and adaptable, and it’s been in service for over 150 years. The warthog is the definition of bad design. We have more capable and competent military vehicles in modern times. Using the warthog just makes the UNSC look stupid. If you want to see a ground vehicle with a similar feel then look at the alliance mako tanks. They’re everything you’d want in a ground vehicle. They’re fast, durable, deadly, and easy to deploy. They also have a similar design ethos of multi-functionality and modularity like everything else in the alliance military
"Cost overruns and disappointing performance killed the replacement, so we'll have to rebuild and upgrade what we have as a stopgap until they figure out the issues." Oof. That's an engineering mood if I've ever heard one. One that always ends up with you being stuck with your stopgap for a long time because it's "good enough" that no one wants to invest in a replacement. Usually it is not, in fact, good enough and you end up constantly patching together a literal dumpster fire for however long it takes the higher ups to realize that, but sometimes, just sometimes you end up with a real gem like the Mistaya.
That seems to happen when you are not at actual war with anyone that pushes the existing design to the breaking point. The US would not still be flying warplanes designed in the 1970s and then replacing them with wildly overbuilt, more expensive (per unit and for the entire program), somehow less capable replacements, if we were at war with enemies that forced Govt and Engineers to saw "This is NOT good enough".
@@DocWolph wildly overbuilt, more expensive (per unit and for the entire program), somehow less capable replacements Why do I get the sense you're referring to the F-35? Assuming that you are, then you might be interested in knowing that the same arguments: "overbuilt, expensive & less-capable than the old stuff" were hurled at the F-14, F-15 & F-16 as well- largely by the same crowd that despises the F-35.
@@OneOddFellow As someone who started off with such a hatred of the F-35 (I still kind of do, but nowhere near as much as before), the F-15 and F-16 do not quite fall under that same past hatred. Well, to be more accurate, the F-14 received the most hatred of the ones listed, though it was largely due to its radical design that incorporated automated variable swept wings. The F-14 was actually the first warplane in service in the US armed forces to be built concurrently - i.e. before testing the designs were complete...just like with the F-35 (and the biggest reason of my own personal hatred of it). Throughout its service, the F-14 regularly suffered breakdowns, especially in its wing-sweeping mechanism and engines. It was a part of why the F-14 was eventually decommissioned and replaced with what can be considered another stopgap measure, the Super Hornet (the F-35 failing to deliver on its promises at the time also forced development of the Super Hornet, hence why the argument and hatred is especially loud with it). Just like the F-35, problems with the F-14's initial designs were found after production began, though unlike with the F-35, there was no clause in the F-14 contract that had the Department of Defense or the USN pay to fix every single problem found in the F-14 - they still paid to stockpile the new upgraded parts, namely the engines, but not for the repair or upgrade process itself, for that fell onto Grumman. Plus, the F-14 had one of the best long-range air-to-air missile systems fielded up to that point (and some argue ever), which proved from the beginning to be quite effective and reliable. The same could not be said for the F-35's systems (even its stealth suffered problems). In fairness, the F-35 has finally begun seeing improvements, but it still has a ways to go to even approach that of the F-14. The F-15 was not that much of an improvement, or at least its design was nowhere near as radical as some other proposals, so while it too received its share of criticism and hatred, it was quickly recognized as a much more stable and more maneuverable design than that of the plane it was replacing, the F-4 Phantom II (the F-15 replaced the USAF's F-4s, while the F-14 replaced the USN's). The F-15's comparatively simpler design garnered more approval amongst the criticism and hatred, so it was able to accepted without any significantly egregious scandals. The F-16 was different from the others. It was designed as a lightweight fighter, meant to be a rapid responder and serve to complement larger and heavier fighters like the F-14 and F-15. Unlike with the other aforementioned planes, its smaller and lighter design contributed to a much lower overall cost, though it came at the expense of endurance, hence why you rarely, if ever, see an F-16 sent out on a combat mission, even a basic CAP, without external fuel tanks. Still, the F-16 was a more cost-effective plane, at least when compared to the F-14 and F-15, but it faced its own scandals in regards to its main rival, the F-17 Cobra, which became the basis for the F/A-18 due to the F-16 not being able to be adapted for the USN. In the end, all three planes still performed at least on the same level as their predecessors, so while the "overbuilt, more expensive, and less capable than the older stuff" argument did come up, it was largely silenced by their combat performances. This is partly why I have softened on the F-35, as it has yet to face any near-peer aircraft in combat, and frankly, I would rather see that it never does (that is a particularly expensive final test for anything). Granted, the potential outcome of F-35s regularly failing to perform, including being shot down with any degree of regularity, would have been an extremely effective kick in the rear to fix its problems much sooner, but with much higher sunk costs into it as well as the truly massive costs for each one, I would rather not see it happen. Couple that with differing approaches to stealth and the possibility of an enemy obtaining sufficiently intact remnants of the F-35 and thus countering or even reverse-engineering its more proprietary stealth features, and you face a potentially serious problem with fielding the F-35 in combat. Thankfully, this possibility has been enough to spur at least some of the improvements and upgrades that have since gone into the F-35, but as I said, it still has a long way to go.
This vehicle gives off the same vibe as the Pelican of Halo, a vehicle so good that it has been used for centuries and will continue to be used in the far future.
@@aidanatkinson7717 warthog is shit. It just happens to be consistently equally shitty in all environments. Pelican design is likely to outlive UNSC Navy.
ZARQLAN WILLS IT! (Zarqlan's dig site basically shows up every single player game when the Spiritualist FE is present. It would be interesting to see a fan interpretation of him.)
The UC-67 sounds to me a lot like the C-130 Hercules. Entered service a while ago, variants are still in use today, not quite a long a service career but still, there are tanker varients, there are attack varients, and many others.
My thoughts exactly, first flight was 67 years ago by the way and so long as Lockheed Martin keeps upgrading the design, chances are it will be around for a very very long time.
@@neilcrombie4100 There are, but the gunship variants were usually ad hoc field modifications, although Boeing made an actual production run of a gunship variant if I remember correctly.
The AC is a Xenophile empire with like hundreds of species and subspecies (Xenocompatibility was enabled). Pretty varied, but think it would be something like what the Covenant had - with gear deviating towards whatever species dominates a particular role.
The full sales pitch at the end of the video was fantastic. I think I'll look into getting myself a futuristic dropship for my own use. Or maybe just a poster
I absolutely love the emphasis of something as extremely inconsequential and boring ingame as planetary warfare that the supplementary videos for Antares have. It really shows the creativity and writing prowess that the Templin Institute is capable of that they're able to make it so captivating.
The UC-67 Mistaya. The C-130 of Antares. Versatile, Modular, and Ready to fight another day. May the swarms of Antarean Mistaya sting fear to those who dare oppress the weak.
Now I am wanting to see more of the confederacy's vehicles! Perhaps a capital ship like the ones we are always seeing in the background of some of the artwork?
Sounds a bit like the US C-130, doesn't matter that the design is approaching 70 years, the robustness and reliability of the airframe coupled with the ability to update and overhaul systems makes for an aircraft whose design will likely still be in production decades from now.
Three centuries of use… The Miranda, Excelsior and B-52 are all sobbing in the corner. Oh look, here come some Star Wars ships strutting along snorting at "just 300 years" - _yeh, well at least they got upgraded unlike your technologically stagnate assess._
Well, the GTU exist in another dimension from the Antares Confederation, the latter being aware of the former, but neither can really interact with the other, at least not without the GTU resuming use of the Jump Drive technology that tore a hole in reality and let the Unbidden flood into their universe
A great ship, makes for an awesome video 💯 Loving the more recent deeper and soothing voice. Combined with the background music, it transports you directly inside the universe 👌 The perfect way to end the day 🖖
amazing, thank you so much for all this whole universe, Antares seems like the best Sci-Fi faction I have ever encounter, this would be the banner I would love to serve under.
I would actually question how they would handle aircraft groundings because having the same standardize aircraft model would mean that any form of accidental crash would lead to mass groundings of entire Mistaya fleets given a lack of a replacement model
So correct me if I’m wrong, - A mistaya is roughly as long as an AC 130 Hercules - it can hold a platoon of men and/or armoured vehicles - the confederacy must have deployed hundreds of not thousands of these during the liberation of Torix -the biggest ships the confederacy had back then were corvettes, destroyers and transports So how freaking big were the ships meant to carry these things?? U mean to tell me that the transports, corvettes and destroyers which are the starting ships of the game are several kilometres long??
I wonder if The Templin Insitute will be doing more videos on the weapons/amour and other stuff from Stellaris Invicta as this vid is amazing and I would love to see more
there is a segment near the end of this video advertising how to buy a SSTO FTL spaceship that is blocked by a sponsor addon for youtube for anyone that uses it, 100 people have skipped that segment! 100 people are going to miss out on the deal of a lifetime xD the funny part is that the ad for a real poster of said spaceship isnt in the segment or even marked as spam by the addon lol!
The part of me that bothered to make a spreadsheet for Sabmadi's military (that was larger than Chengatai's was by the end) wishes to thank Rajhi Viet for the UC-67Gs on behalf of Nos. 100, 101, 102, 105, 106, 108, 602, 603, and 604 Squadrons... possibly the niche-est comment this video might get but I'm posting it anyway Edit: Decided to make it more niche and point out my own mistake in having added three more units than the poster says we had
Just 3 centuries of use? In my united states of earth games all air travel is done with modernized B52 stratofortresses. Why spend more money when you can just modernize a nearly century old design?
Gotta admit, I never expected to see a fictional company from Stellaris Invicta sponsor an Arsenal video. Now all wee need is an Arsenal video on the Sword of Terra and other vehicles from the GTU and Antares.
Last chance to get a patch featuring the insignia of the 1077th Tank Regiment & Antares Confederacy emblem pin! | www.patreon.com/templininstitute (Offer ends Nov 23rd)
Get a poster featuring the most famous variants of the UC-67! | shop.templin.institute/collections/antares-confederacy/products/uc-67-mistaya-variants-antares-confederacy-poster
Please make a second mistaya video 🙏
How they wrote this "Shuttle" reminds me of the Warhog of the UNSC. A simple vehicle that has grown with the nation and has become a symbol inof itself
I know you missed the the "t" in warthog. But now I'm invisoning a armored more modern war version of a warthog simply called "Warhog" a spartan version of the venerable IFV of the unsc with shields and a badass minigun style of a gauss cannon
@@austinguthrie5528 Sound like the current Humvee - overweight with armor.
I think it fits more in line with the Pelican. The pelican is used for the same thing, is equally modular and adaptable, and it’s been in service for over 150 years. The warthog is the definition of bad design. We have more capable and competent military vehicles in modern times. Using the warthog just makes the UNSC look stupid.
If you want to see a ground vehicle with a similar feel then look at the alliance mako tanks. They’re everything you’d want in a ground vehicle. They’re fast, durable, deadly, and easy to deploy. They also have a similar design ethos of multi-functionality and modularity like everything else in the alliance military
"Cost overruns and disappointing performance killed the replacement, so we'll have to rebuild and upgrade what we have as a stopgap until they figure out the issues."
Oof. That's an engineering mood if I've ever heard one. One that always ends up with you being stuck with your stopgap for a long time because it's "good enough" that no one wants to invest in a replacement. Usually it is not, in fact, good enough and you end up constantly patching together a literal dumpster fire for however long it takes the higher ups to realize that, but sometimes, just sometimes you end up with a real gem like the Mistaya.
Sounds a bit like the C-130 to me.
That seems to happen when you are not at actual war with anyone that pushes the existing design to the breaking point. The US would not still be flying warplanes designed in the 1970s and then replacing them with wildly overbuilt, more expensive (per unit and for the entire program), somehow less capable replacements, if we were at war with enemies that forced Govt and Engineers to saw "This is NOT good enough".
@@DocWolph wildly overbuilt, more expensive (per unit and for the entire program), somehow less capable replacements
Why do I get the sense you're referring to the F-35?
Assuming that you are, then you might be interested in knowing that the same arguments: "overbuilt, expensive & less-capable than the old stuff" were hurled at the F-14, F-15 & F-16 as well- largely by the same crowd that despises the F-35.
@@OneOddFellow As someone who started off with such a hatred of the F-35 (I still kind of do, but nowhere near as much as before), the F-15 and F-16 do not quite fall under that same past hatred. Well, to be more accurate, the F-14 received the most hatred of the ones listed, though it was largely due to its radical design that incorporated automated variable swept wings. The F-14 was actually the first warplane in service in the US armed forces to be built concurrently - i.e. before testing the designs were complete...just like with the F-35 (and the biggest reason of my own personal hatred of it). Throughout its service, the F-14 regularly suffered breakdowns, especially in its wing-sweeping mechanism and engines. It was a part of why the F-14 was eventually decommissioned and replaced with what can be considered another stopgap measure, the Super Hornet (the F-35 failing to deliver on its promises at the time also forced development of the Super Hornet, hence why the argument and hatred is especially loud with it).
Just like the F-35, problems with the F-14's initial designs were found after production began, though unlike with the F-35, there was no clause in the F-14 contract that had the Department of Defense or the USN pay to fix every single problem found in the F-14 - they still paid to stockpile the new upgraded parts, namely the engines, but not for the repair or upgrade process itself, for that fell onto Grumman. Plus, the F-14 had one of the best long-range air-to-air missile systems fielded up to that point (and some argue ever), which proved from the beginning to be quite effective and reliable. The same could not be said for the F-35's systems (even its stealth suffered problems). In fairness, the F-35 has finally begun seeing improvements, but it still has a ways to go to even approach that of the F-14.
The F-15 was not that much of an improvement, or at least its design was nowhere near as radical as some other proposals, so while it too received its share of criticism and hatred, it was quickly recognized as a much more stable and more maneuverable design than that of the plane it was replacing, the F-4 Phantom II (the F-15 replaced the USAF's F-4s, while the F-14 replaced the USN's). The F-15's comparatively simpler design garnered more approval amongst the criticism and hatred, so it was able to accepted without any significantly egregious scandals.
The F-16 was different from the others. It was designed as a lightweight fighter, meant to be a rapid responder and serve to complement larger and heavier fighters like the F-14 and F-15. Unlike with the other aforementioned planes, its smaller and lighter design contributed to a much lower overall cost, though it came at the expense of endurance, hence why you rarely, if ever, see an F-16 sent out on a combat mission, even a basic CAP, without external fuel tanks. Still, the F-16 was a more cost-effective plane, at least when compared to the F-14 and F-15, but it faced its own scandals in regards to its main rival, the F-17 Cobra, which became the basis for the F/A-18 due to the F-16 not being able to be adapted for the USN.
In the end, all three planes still performed at least on the same level as their predecessors, so while the "overbuilt, more expensive, and less capable than the older stuff" argument did come up, it was largely silenced by their combat performances. This is partly why I have softened on the F-35, as it has yet to face any near-peer aircraft in combat, and frankly, I would rather see that it never does (that is a particularly expensive final test for anything). Granted, the potential outcome of F-35s regularly failing to perform, including being shot down with any degree of regularity, would have been an extremely effective kick in the rear to fix its problems much sooner, but with much higher sunk costs into it as well as the truly massive costs for each one, I would rather not see it happen. Couple that with differing approaches to stealth and the possibility of an enemy obtaining sufficiently intact remnants of the F-35 and thus countering or even reverse-engineering its more proprietary stealth features, and you face a potentially serious problem with fielding the F-35 in combat. Thankfully, this possibility has been enough to spur at least some of the improvements and upgrades that have since gone into the F-35, but as I said, it still has a long way to go.
@@OneOddFellow I was going to say just that.
I like the realistic take on a dropship here.
It's like a Space Shuttle mixed with a fighter jet.
Reminds me alot of the Pelican dropship from Halo just itt's not a VTOL.
Space Shuttle, except not a death trap.
It's really well done - a convincing design for an SSTO in a relatively hard sf setting.
You cannot understate the worth of a good, well designed workhorse.
Forward Antares!
This vehicle gives off the same vibe as the Pelican of Halo, a vehicle so good that it has been used for centuries and will continue to be used in the far future.
That's of course, just a coincidence ;)
Nothin matches the warthog lol, things like 200 years old lmao
@@aidanatkinson7717 warthog is shit. It just happens to be consistently equally shitty in all environments. Pelican design is likely to outlive UNSC Navy.
The Pilgrims of Zarqlan next! The History of the Confederacy is incomplete without them, or their discoverer, Dronafeg! Zarqlan Wills It!
ZARQLAN WILLS IT! (Zarqlan's dig site basically shows up every single player game when the Spiritualist FE is present. It would be interesting to see a fan interpretation of him.)
By the head of Zarqlan!
The UC-67 sounds to me a lot like the C-130 Hercules. Entered service a while ago, variants are still in use today, not quite a long a service career but still, there are tanker varients, there are attack varients, and many others.
I was thinking Catalinas. Or the Twin Otter. There's probably some more direct inspiration, but I don't know planes well enough.
@@EGRJ I was thinking Chinook been in service since 1960s can carry cargo or troops is robust and pretty sure there are gunship variants.
My thoughts exactly, first flight was 67 years ago by the way and so long as Lockheed Martin keeps upgrading the design, chances are it will be around for a very very long time.
@@neilcrombie4100 There are, but the gunship variants were usually ad hoc field modifications, although Boeing made an actual production run of a gunship variant if I remember correctly.
Throw in a little F/A-18E/F Super Hornet there for good measure.
Who else would love a physical model of that craft? I don't care if it's die-cast or Lego or plastic.
I would like a stl file so I can print it
A lego version would actually be pretty awesome...
The UC-67 “Mistaya” Dropship AKA…..The Bullet Beak!
"Bullet Beak, initiate Operation: Annihilation."
The amount of artwork you created for this video is very impressive.
Was wondering when you guys were going to cover the vehicles of Invicta.
I’m kinda curious what their infantry gear looks like and how its evolved now.
Seconded, and the differences between Navy, Army, and Pioneer Corps.
The AC is a Xenophile empire with like hundreds of species and subspecies (Xenocompatibility was enabled). Pretty varied, but think it would be something like what the Covenant had - with gear deviating towards whatever species dominates a particular role.
@@pll3827 the Tavurite's seem to serve as the Backbone of the Armed forces.
The full sales pitch at the end of the video was fantastic. I think I'll look into getting myself a futuristic dropship for my own use. Or maybe just a poster
D77-TC Pelican: "Finally, a worthy opponent; Our battle will be Legendary!"
Every sci-fi show needs a Huey, a black hawk or a hind.
More like they both get drunk, then taxi off to a seedy hangar
@@hellacoorinna9995 I like your funny words magic man 😂
@@chuckbuck5002 I guess you could say, I _blew your mind_
@@hellacoorinna9995 I bet that seedy hangar is full with hanging parachutes, eh. 😉 _nudge nudge wink wink_
*cue Pearl Harbor theme
Excited for Stellaris Invicta season 3!
Eeerrr... the correct is "excited".
Why did you exit? Why?
I absolutely love the emphasis of something as extremely inconsequential and boring ingame as planetary warfare that the supplementary videos for Antares have. It really shows the creativity and writing prowess that the Templin Institute is capable of that they're able to make it so captivating.
What happened when the unstoppable force met the immovable object ?
We called it mistaya it does both
Lol nice
First episode to use entirely original images created by the Templin Institute everyone nice
The UC-67 Mistaya. The C-130 of Antares.
Versatile, Modular, and Ready to fight another day.
May the swarms of Antarean Mistaya sting fear to those who dare oppress the weak.
Now I am wanting to see more of the confederacy's vehicles! Perhaps a capital ship like the ones we are always seeing in the background of some of the artwork?
Someone has been “referencing” designs from Star Citizen.
Sounds a bit like the US C-130, doesn't matter that the design is approaching 70 years, the robustness and reliability of the airframe coupled with the ability to update and overhaul systems makes for an aircraft whose design will likely still be in production decades from now.
Getting knowledge about heat transfer and molecular composition of solid materials with an ancient rock people makes a lot of sense.
I hope we get some GTU Arsenal videos. I know season 1 has ended but I really want more Lore from that season.
I love how much about the Mistaya is like a BSG Raptor.
10:58 I can’t be the only one beside themself with the fact that the Antares Confederacy brought the sport of Hockey with them to the greater galaxy?
Maybe their version of hockey defer greatly to the hockey we knew today. BTW we got 2 hockey sports on Earth.
love these additional videos for both the GTU and the confed and are some of my favorites. I always look forward to the next one.
Three centuries of use…
The Miranda, Excelsior and B-52 are all sobbing in the corner.
Oh look, here come some Star Wars ships strutting along snorting at "just 300 years" - _yeh, well at least they got upgraded unlike your technologically stagnate assess._
When will the lore of the sealed fallen colony and the relationship between Antares and the GTU be revealed?
Well, the GTU exist in another dimension from the Antares Confederation, the latter being aware of the former, but neither can really interact with the other, at least not without the GTU resuming use of the Jump Drive technology that tore a hole in reality and let the Unbidden flood into their universe
I can only imagine the latter models with Sapient Combat Computers. I wonder if you could 'marry' a sentient dropship?
Only if it were named Sheila
“Hey, I’ve seen this anime!”
@@asgodandheinleinintended2398 Dropship Harem anime.
A great ship, makes for an awesome video 💯
Loving the more recent deeper and soothing voice. Combined with the background music, it transports you directly inside the universe 👌
The perfect way to end the day 🖖
That VO at the end sold me. I need a UC-67
This timeline has so much interesting technology
amazing, thank you so much for all this whole universe, Antares seems like the best Sci-Fi faction I have ever encounter, this would be the banner I would love to serve under.
Keep these coming and we'll Gobble em up! Have a great Thanksgiving! Templin!
Ooh, I like this vehicle. nice design!
Wow that was cool honestly one off the best episodes yet
This is legit going to be what happens to the Lockheed Martin C-130 airframe... it and the B-52 will still be in service decades after we're gone
@Dilet A space capable, quarter sized nuclear reactor powered SB-52Z Super Stratofortress would be awesome
"One should only innovate after having a solid foundation set in dogma."
Oooh I would love more of these, like the battleships or the fighter jets!
God damn I can not wait for you to cover some heavies
That's a really cool looking vessel. Really awesome.
Nice synopsis. Very cool multi-mission craft.
So absolutely cool. Imma go buy a 67A.
Also, great VA.
Good sponsor segments are usually good because they’re funny. This one wasn’t funny but it’s one of the best I’ve ever seen.
I would actually question how they would handle aircraft groundings because having the same standardize aircraft model would mean that any form of accidental crash would lead to mass groundings of entire Mistaya fleets given a lack of a replacement model
Love the sponsor section at the end :)))
So correct me if I’m wrong,
- A mistaya is roughly as long as an AC 130 Hercules
- it can hold a platoon of men and/or armoured vehicles
- the confederacy must have deployed hundreds of not thousands of these during the liberation of Torix
-the biggest ships the confederacy had back then were corvettes, destroyers and transports
So how freaking big were the ships meant to carry these things?? U mean to tell me that the transports, corvettes and destroyers which are the starting ships of the game are several kilometres long??
That cockpit is reminiscent of the Huey UH-1 and her variants and replacements.
She's a beauty.
I wonder if The Templin Insitute will be doing more videos on the weapons/amour and other stuff from Stellaris Invicta as this vid is amazing and I would love to see more
Would love to see the history of the tanks!
Man seeing this makes me want to make a narrative stellaris campaign
Anyone else notice that the text at the main presentation says “sundial” it’s a nice touch
This reminds me a lot of Marvel's Quinn Jet.
there is a segment near the end of this video advertising how to buy a SSTO FTL spaceship that is blocked by a sponsor addon for youtube for anyone that uses it, 100 people have skipped that segment! 100 people are going to miss out on the deal of a lifetime xD
the funny part is that the ad for a real poster of said spaceship isnt in the segment or even marked as spam by the addon lol!
I'll take a few dozen please :P These craft are basically the perfect jack of all trades craft.
Reminds me of the Quinjet.
More episodes of antaris pls !
Like the older sibling of a bsg Raptor
Funny that few of the initial colonists of Antares were from the western world but the dimensions of the Mistaya are still measured in imperial.
The part of me that bothered to make a spreadsheet for Sabmadi's military (that was larger than Chengatai's was by the end) wishes to thank Rajhi Viet for the UC-67Gs on behalf of Nos. 100, 101, 102, 105, 106, 108, 602, 603, and 604 Squadrons... possibly the niche-est comment this video might get but I'm posting it anyway
Edit: Decided to make it more niche and point out my own mistake in having added three more units than the poster says we had
Can't wait.
Now I want to know what MBT that the confederacy/commonwealth use since one of their most renowned and decorated military units is a tank regiment
Its like the D-77 pelican from halo, but more varied in its roles
Thank you the English subtitle.
look into the world of battle of the planets plz. I'd love to see you look into that world.
Christmas came early!
Currently role playing kingdom of Atlantis in stellaris and loving it
Oh my god so creative a copy of the pelican from halo or the valkyrie from 40k
Long Large is it compared to something like a Pelican or a Republic dropship?
Edit: fixed the dripship to dropship
Would love to see a dripship
Well you aren't wrong about it having drip!
Those ship lowkey drippy so you're not wrong.
Just 3 centuries of use? In my united states of earth games all air travel is done with modernized B52 stratofortresses. Why spend more money when you can just modernize a nearly century old design?
Only a Calgary native would chose "Akachi Flames"
Forward Antares!
I would love more videos about in world information for stellaris invicta
Great video. Can you do a video on the tanks of the Confederacy/commonwealth and the UNE?
Do you guys have a 3d model of the aerospacecraft? I would love to turn it into a physical model
Mirrors my thought
This makes me wish Transport Ships/Fighters were as customizable as Fleet ships.
If I were to set a story in this universe I'd probably set it during the Moya Pact wars.
It doesn't look like a dropship, I can't see the troop bay we need more schematics showing components and such.
This dropship right here.. Has better design that any shit Star Citizen has to offer.
Who makes the art for stuff like this? It looks amazing!
Space Black Hawk
You are not wrong.
10:32- Yosemite Valley.... in space?
I am intrigued by what a UC-67 can do for my podcasting business. How can I get in contact with the manufacturer again for a quote?
I would love to contribute to season 3! How would I do that as a skint university student? What I lack in funds I make up for in imagination!
So, is this a fan-made vehicle? Or something within an actual game? Very well done regardless.
Ok.. now we need to see how's the antares tank
I want one.
Great video, i just have no idea, why the hell the Antares Confedracy is using imperial measurements...
Wow!
Gotta admit, I never expected to see a fictional company from Stellaris Invicta sponsor an Arsenal video.
Now all wee need is an Arsenal video on the Sword of Terra and other vehicles from the GTU and Antares.
That's how it should be done.
Cross a F-31 with the Coalition gunship from Deserts of Kharak and you have this ship.
The warthog of the antaries confederacy
Rajhi Viet Aerospace Stonks: 📈📈📈
Stellarís invíctás
to simply put and summarize the whole video ., the “mistaya” aircraft is the work horse aircarft of the antares confederacy armed forces.
Antares' version of the Jeep / Humvee