The Slowest Planes ever Made
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 тра 2024
- Aircraft are typically associated with speed and the ability to cover long distances in a short amount of time, as it's this speed that increases the airflow over their wings to reduce pressure enabling them to lift. However, there are some planes that defy this notion and can still fly at slow speeds, akin to that of a running person. In this video, we will showcase the 15 slowest planes that have the remarkable capability to stay airborne despite their sluggish pace. Each of these planes has its own unique design and engineering methods that enable them to stay airborne. From the oldest plane that has been flying for over 115 years to the cutting-edge solar-powered airplanes that can circumnavigate the earth and even a human-powered aircraft, this video promises to leave you in awe not only of their slow speeds but also of the impressive engineering characteristics behind them. So make sure you stay tuned to witness these incredible flying machines in action.
if any content owners notice that the fair use has been abused. PLEASE contact us for further procedures and actions through our email: copyattendant@gmail.com
Thank you.
I've had the honour of being a passenger in an Antonov AN-2 Colt and the incredible experience of when it slowed down, then stopped then flew backwards. Then they shoved it in first gear (or whatever it is they do) and we calmly started off going forward again. Wonderful aircraft. Watched a mock dogfight with a Fieseler Fi 156 Storch and Gloster Gladiator Biplane at Old Warden here in England. The Gladiator had speed against the Storch which was so slow it could move out of the way Quickly. Another very impressive slow flier The Bristol Boxkite. Old Warden flies some of the oldest original aircraft including getting a Bleriot XI into the air.
With 1000hp the AN2 could be a lot of fun.
One of my favorite airplanes. Getting one is on my bucket list.
AN-2 is hell bumpy in flight and there are no proper seats but benches inside so you have to fly sideways. I flew it intercity a lot back in the day when I was a kid.
@@MSM5500 That's interesting. The one I flew in in 1993 had proper forward facing seats. I sat front passenger window seat between the wings starboard side. Roughly about 12 to 14 passenger seats and can remember as you board the aircraft had coat hangers.
Der Fieseler Storch war ein Eindecker 😊
That Blériot is the only airplane that can get a bird strike from the rear. ;-)
Insurance company: How did you crash?
Bleriot owner: A buzzard rearended me.
Wow, not funny nor remotely original... you sure nailed it Rick
Any plane that travels slower than 300 km/h can be rear ended by a Peregrine Falcon.
The Albatross is slower.
My Santos-Dumont Demoiselle replica, built in 2005 with an increased wing span, is slower in level flight. It can comfortably cruise at 20-25 knots.
Good information, but it would be nicer if a real person were narrating.
Right on…I was listening to the narrative while cooking and couldn’t figure out what it was talking about when it said, “….a Russian anntoo…”. Great video ruined by a lousy voice.
Beggars can't be choosers
It's an A N 2
It's a Storch
also this text is almost read verbatim from wikipedia
Too bad some of these aren't still made today. The size, simplicity, and affordability of these type airplanes helped overcome the intimidation factor of flying back in the day.
You think? You should probably read a book or two on the extremely dangerous lives of early pioneering flights such as those made by early pioneers such as Bleriot. PS didn't you watch the video beyond the first few seconds, or have you never seen a modern microlight or ultralight?
@@memkiii Excuse me all to hell.
Slow flying is cool. Like birds. Enjoying the view.
Then buy a glider so you can enjoy the silence that comes with those gorgeous views
the Storch was constructed by the German firm of Fieseler to be used in liaison service by the Wehrmacht.
That was the original WWII timeframe Storch - which IS mentioned by model number in the video.
There have been a LOT of kit-planes and other versions of the design since - some of which fly even SLOWER than the original could manage.
We Argentines have the honor of having a hero of the aviation of the early 20th century, Don Jorge Newvery, who attempted to cross the Andes Mountains with a Morane Saulnier.
Trying to invade Chile I suppose.
Beware the "Equal Transit Time" theory of lift which is alluded to in the beginning of this video.
Correct. There is no force which seeks to match the transit time, and the transit times are not even the same
Always funny when someone says low pressure creates lift.
@@annoyingbstard9407 I have never understood the narrative that the air is low pressure over the wing, when the air is actually getting compressed under the wing. Another 'proof' of the theory is, it does not matter how much junk you put under the wing, the wing gets good lift, but put junk on top of the wing, and cause the air to compress there, and you lose lift!
@@jeffreyyoung4104 Really... and you have presumably published a peer reviewed paper to completely rewrite established knowledge?
@@memkiii And by mentioning "peer reviewed" you have announced to The World that you have a closed mind. . . .
For me, the Blériot is the most amazing of all the aircraft represented. It was a very ingenious design for its day. The fact that at least one is still flyable today boggles the mind!🙂🙃🙂👍
Missed the '90s Wainfan FMX-4 "Facetmobile".
740 lbs, with 340lbs useful load demonstrated flying cross country to Oshkosk.100 kts on 40hp. While being sleek and quick on low power while carrying a load, it could stay aloft at under 16kts and would not stall.
The Arup S-2of Indiana in 1934. 780lbs, 85kts on 37 hp, landing speed under 18kts. Steep 45°climb, would not stall.
It and the following S-4 flew without incident for several seasons of airshows, frequently carrying advertising to pay for shop and hangar space because nobody wanted to buy or invest.
The Nemeth parachute plane of the '30s. The fuselage of an Alliance Argo biplane with a 15' diameter circular wing parasol above the fuselage.
Faster than the original, 45° climb, 60° super slow descent with landing roll in its length with any wind. Stall-proof.
The Eshelman commonly known as the flying flounder of the early '40s. Aspect ratio under 1. 156kts on 110hp, super STOL and stall-proof.
All these are found on youtubes.
THANKS! I'm gonna go search!
Didn't mention the Bailey Moyes Dragonfly. Cruises at 45 mph--stalls at 20 mph.
Antonov AN-2 spotted!, automatic thumbs up!
Any plane can land or take off in a short distance with enough headwind. My Quick Silver with a 100cc Yamaha had a stall speed of 18mph - zero wind.
The inspiration of the Blariot XI became the Fokker Eindecker and used very successfully in the early war years of WWI.
Used as a fighter, a strike aircraft and reconnaissance plane the redesigned Blariot was used against the French aeroplane designers. The history of this plane is actually quite impressive with the names of some very successful aces of WWI and later WWII who got their start in such a plane.
We all think of the Fokker Triplane as the pinnacle of German planes in WWI, but those had three wings. The first German war machines that dominated the skies were single-wing (monoplanes) that had control surfaces what warped the shape of the wing instead of using flaps to control the direction the plane flew.
They are fascinating planes to research.
The Storch, has always fascinated me, it had a great war record.
Flying in an An-2 is like standing almost still in the air. BTW, the Junkers 52 felt the same.
The Blériot flew over Montréal in 1911 first air show in Canada, a replica is being built in Ste Anne Debellevue at Montréal air museum on McGill college and university campus, air craft for 1911 included the Wright’s brothers, lighter than air ballon’s there is footage of that event, stages and bleachers where setup near where now is city hall Pointe-Claire city hall.
A.I. voice
Sux eh!
Yeah, I heard the same voice on some cat channels and was like "Great, the rise of the f*cking robots continues."
Honestly not sure why they can't narrate the video with their actual voice
@@Carcharius apparently because they cannot even write the script well....have you heard how the bot pronounced ''eleven''?
PZL M-15 Belphegor was not designed by any polish aircraft maker. The idea for the aircraft was conceived by Soviet engineer Riamir Izmaylov. Then the plane was designed in his bureau and finally the production was handed over to Poland. The famous russian aircraft designer Oleg Antonov called the plane 'a rocket for digging potatoes'.
Great work. I watch many aircraft videos and many of these planes were new to me. Thank you!
Slow flight is impressive too! I like STOL capability. Seeing things from above, low and slow is terrific!
Great video, thanks!
I first saw the AN-2 on the Rocky and Bullwinkle show back in the 60s
Watched a video yesterday about *Bobby Bailey* - creator of the Bailey Moyes Dragonfly, designed specifically to be controllable at SLOW speeds. He described it as made to go up, and go down. It's competitions was a plane named The Drifter. The Dragonfly had relatively HUGE wings and Ailerons. Ailerons that worked in a stall and even after stalling. Saw shots of Bobby flying this thing like he was part of it, full-on maneuvers and flying sideways and human jogging speed. Before beating me up on inaccuracies in my post, know that I know ZERO about hang gliding, tow planes or any of it. Just a fan or all things aeronautical and capable of flight since getting into quadcopters for photography. Bobby Baily died shortly after giving the brief interview I saw, during a test flight of a customer built Dragonfly. Bobby, at 70-ish years of age was lost by the misuse, or incorrect fitting of wing retention bot or bolts. He did not see it, and the wing separated at some 350 feet AGL. RIP Bobby, you seemed incredibly talented, smart, soft spoken, and am was truly sorry to hear of your passing, in the same moment I learned of your work. Bobby, and people like him, are the reason you don't see hang gliders towed by boats anymore.
I learned to hang glide on a Birdman MJ6 back in the 80’s
Nice job!
Happy to subscribe❤
When seeing the Bleriot one does expect the soundtrack of "Those magnificent men in their flying machines".
No Flying pancake? That had a landing speed of 15 MPH.
😁
Good video!
02:45 Antonov AN-2 can fly with -8 km/h (backwards) when it has 56 km/h headwind
I am puzzled by the opening few phrases which seem to indicate that the ability to fly depends upon the 'speed/velocity' of the wing through the air. Surely the 'Lift' is provided by the difference in the air velocity over the upper and lower surfaces of the wing so if the air is going faster or slower the lift does not change because the difference does not change. Speed through the air is governed by the power of the engive and the lift by the profile of the wing. To take off you travel forward in order to provide a smooth airflow and then alter the angle of the wing relative to the motion which increases the lift sufficient to raise the weight of the aircraft. If velocity was the main requirement birds would not be able to fly and certainkly not butterflys.
You never once mentioned that force is proportional to the square of speed and so is drag - - even a "butterfly" knows that. Show your math.
@@peterdarr383 I am certain my post is a querying type post, more or less asking a question rather than making a statement.
Incidentally I am aware that 'Drag' has a Square, Cube and possible higher root relationship in the drag component dependant upon Velocity and also that the 'math' is largely empirical. Or as I like to call them, 'Fiddle Factors'.
Why is pchelka not mentioned?))
Why almost none of English speakers care to check how Slavic names are pronounced (while still pronouncing German and French names right)? "Antonov" has a stress on the 2nd syllable, and "Jaroslav" starts with "ya", like in "yard".
The red Baron had 3 wings. He could almost stop
Spin around And Papa cap in your a** as you went by.
4 wings - - there was a short wing in the front gear. . . !!
What does the An-2's airSPEED have to do with airWORTHINESS? Those are entirely different, unrelated concepts.
Can’t top a design that works, regardless of WHEN it was made. We should honestly start making more AN-2 aircraft with some more powerful engines. It’s a plane that’s INCAPABLE of crashing without deliberately trying to mess it up. We need more of these things.
You have a choice of a $50k AN-2, or a $ 1.5 M Cessna Caravan. Which do you think the FAA will license for commercial use ?
@@xzqzq both, actually. The AN-2 was produced all the way into 2001. Kit aircraft also still make up a large part of current small-time air travel. Douglas DC-3s are still in service worldwide, and I just saw one of those getting worked on at an airfield during a road trip. So I’d still choose the biplane for the price of a Land Rover, and use that.
My understand is not only does the FAA refuse to license the AN-2 for commercial use, that any complaints that using your own AN-2 in your business results in loss of income for commercial haulers will result in cease & desist orders from the FAA. as happened in a case in Alaska....
Very interesting video! I've thought that an aeroplane must have fairly high speed to fly, something 120-150 km/h. Well, I was wrong.
missed talking about the Army-Lockheed YO-3A based on SGS 2-32 glider.
They divert air. Simply move air, to make lift.
All it takes is low wing loading and some under-camber to STOL.
imagine you can fly over traffic
For the slowest planes of all, check out the videos of microfilm model airplanes. They fly indoors, are powered by a rubber band, and move at less than walking speed.
Or check out Gnats and Baby Spiders - Dandelion seeds and Dust mites !
Track sprinters can run faster than the last plane.
When talking about planes we usually hear how fast but with these we are hearing how slow they go
The slowest planes ever made? You obviously haven't flown Jetstar.
It is not Aan 2 but Ay En 2. God...
What do we have here at 10:34?
The PZL M-15 Belphegor is NOT the heaviest biplane ever manufactured.
Its MTOW is 5,650 kg, The Handley Page O/400 had an MTOW of 6,060 kg, 410 kg (7.3%) higher.
Notably, the H.P.12 (the O/400) was introduced during WW1, in 1916, and 600 were built up to 1919.
Then there is the Handley Page V/1500: Gross Weight: 13,608 kg, first flight 1918. Only 40 planes made due to WW1 ending.
And the Siemens-Schuckert R.VIII -- its empty weight(!) is ~10.5 tons, almost twice what the PZL M-15 has as maximum takeof weight! Gross weight 16,867 kg. Only one completed, not repaired after a gearbox failure during ground testing caused extensive damage --- the Treaty of Versailles being very restrictive when it came to planes and submarines and the like.
Zeppelin-Staaken R.VI: gross weight 11,848 kg, 18 built.
.... and a good number of other Riesenflugzeuge (R-planes) in WW1 that are a lot larger, heavier etc.
Kindly check your sources.
At the time, this aircraft in the thumbnail, the Bleriot was the most successful aircraft manufactured. More successful than the Wright Brothers who by today's aviation standards were a failure.
The Wright Bros. couldn't get patent protection until 1909 and EVERYBODY in the World already copied them. Today they woulda sued for Billions !!
7:12
You will find that the Savanna is a copy of a Zennair and the Storch is a copy of the plane with the same name build by Fiesler.
*Fieseler Storch, 1936
No Heliocurrier?
Man Powered Flight by Andrew Kudlacik .
Why no paramotors, takeoff and landing at human foot-speed..?
Things like FAR and AN-2 would be better pronounced by the TTS engine by having their spelling adapted ("F A R", "A N 2", etc) so that the TTS voice would not attempt to say them as words, but rather pronounce the actual acronyms themselves.
Also, using part of the clip from an AN-2 accident (03:31) where two people lost their lives is a display of dubious taste.
At that height over the English Channel and its speed, how much affect did ground effect have on it?
When talking about Blériot, please never say "ground breaking" anymore. Hard landing is good enough.
No, planes do not fly by pushing air down, gaining lift through Newtonian reaction. Its all about Bernoulli.
Air over the top moves past the chord faster than air over the top, rarifying it further.
A ram-wing GEV doesn't fly by bouncing air off the underside of the wing and back up from the ground, back and forth. It doesn't transition from Bernuolli lift in GE to supposedly Newtonian reaction in the air above GE.
Look at videos of Jets flying JUST over a cloud bank, then watch the WING WASH push DOWN into the cloud. If it were ALL Bernoulli then there would BE NO down component to the reaction.
a 1964 plymouth savoy max will get you there faster
Go Taylor !
I recently walked by a reconstructed Wright Flyer --- the first powered aircraft. Nearby was an actual Gossamer Albatross, which flew, human powered across the English Channel. Nearby was an actual SR71, the fastest ever aircraft. Nearby were an actual B-17, B-29, B37, B47 and B52 bomber.
The SR71 impressed me the most. It is really a gigantic aircraft, seating a total on ONE person!
These were among many other historic aircraft.
Where do you suppose I was?
The Wright was not the first powered aircraft; it was a powered aeroplane that carried a human pilot, though it lacked certain features required to be called a true aeroplane. Before that there were powered dirigibles that were also aircraft.
It is not an Ann 2, it is an A N 2.
The mispronunciations abound in this clip!
Actually, by Soviet naming standards it would be pronounced as “Ann 2”. Being that it is not an acronym and is just the first part of the name Antonov.
yet another bot reading a script while showing public domain vids
Last year I bought a 2008 Flyitalia MD3 Rider. It needed a lot of work but I got it in the air early in December. During my first flight with it my CFI asked me to do a power off stall. When I hit 25 knots indicated air speed and the plane still showed no sign of stalling my instructor said "uhhhh... just power up and go on".
The Slecev torch is a copy of the famous Fieseler Storch from WW II!
1936
this could have been a great video if not a robot (dead) voice would have been used. instead i add the channel to the block list
Shelde moosh? No. S-Gell-Duh Muh-S. But that Dutch sch is very very difficult to learn. And the musch is not fair, because this Dutch word for sparrow is no longer musch. Now it is mus. There is no SG-sound anymore. Your SH is what Germans do, so, moosh came close. But yeah, that U, you really have no U like that. Dutch is not easy. Great to see this small biplane, I had no idea it exists.
zlin is in the czech rep not slovakia :)
Of course the slepcev is a copy of the german Fieseler Fi 156, that flew first in 1936 and not a serbian invention.
I'll take one of each. Kthx
I learned to fly in a cub back in the sixties!
A couple of shots of Zlin-526 aerobatic aircraft smuggled in there.
Almost hilarious
please can we have a real presenter.... or one that doesn't talk like a robot.
Some weird pronunciation going on there. How about getting a real person to give the narration rather than some weird robot voice…?
Slow is good
Me firts
You misspelled “farts”
I know it’s autocorrect
Lol! It always changes my f words to Duck.
L
would be a much better vid without the stupid robo voice
Slowest aircraft is the helicopter and the hawker siddeley harrier since it can fly backwards. Case closed.
They are not the slowest planes , my plane is slower cause it just doesn't move at all
give it up cupcake, you're really not at all funny
First plane you talked about and showed you had the wrong info. Not worth watching the rest. More BS.
cool then leave, obody will miss you bye bye
NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!
Hey narrator, you keep talking about 'slow speed'. There is NO SUCH THING as a 'slow speed' !!!!!!!
"Speed" is an abstract concept designed to convey a relative measurement of movement. "Speed" has no physical properties - one cannot paint, hold, touch, throw or place a speed in one's pocket. Likewise one cannot move or stop a speed, therefore it cannot be "fast" or "slow" although whatever is being measured can be.
The speed of a plane can be "high" or "low", speed cannot be. Speed is the measurement, not what is being measured. To say the "speed is slow" is confusing the measurement with what is being measured. Speed can be "high" or "higher" or "lower" relative to some other measurement. Saying "The speed of the plane is slow" just doesn't make any sense and is unnecessarily wordy. It is the plane that goes slow, not the speed!!! "The plane is slow" makes sense and is correctly stated.
What are you blabbering on about? ""The speed of the plane is slow" is a perfectly fine way to say it, it is nothing wrong saying it like that and should be easy to understand.... Unless YOU are stupid.
This video is filled with more misinformation than a Trump speech. 45+ year A&P, here. There is so much wrong with the information in this video, I don't know where to begin.
Planes with Diesel ! engine. prop prop propropropropproproproprop