What is the Geological Evidence for a Young Earth? - Dr. Andrew Snelling
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 вер 2024
- Taken from "Beyond Is Genesis History? Vol 1 : Rocks & Fossils." Check it out on our website: bit.ly/BIGH-1
After you’ve watched the documentary film and want to learn more, this is your next step. Explore the impact of the global flood on the Earth in these 20 new videos featuring scientists from the film.
☞ Purchase all three in the series here: bit.ly/BIGH-Set
Geologist Andrew Snelling discusses geological evidences for a young earth, including the large extent of rock layers, a lack of significant erosion between the layers, and an absence of major bioturbation within the layers. The Coconino Sandstone provides abundant evidence of underwater origin. He and Del Tackett end by discussing the nature of the geological column and how it was originally a creationist concept.
Dr. Snelling completed a BS in applied geology at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, graduating with first-class honors in 1975. His PhD in geology was awarded in 1982 by The University of Sydney for his research thesis titled “A Geochemical Study of the Koongarra Uranium Deposit, Northern Territory, Australia.” Dr. Snelling worked for six years in the exploration and mining industries in Tasmania, New South Wales, Victoria, Western Australia, and the Northern Territory, variously as a field, mine, and research geologist. For over ten years, Dr. Snelling was a research consultant to the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization for an international collaborative research project funded by the U.S. Department of Energy which involved university and government research scientists from the USA, UK, Australia, Japan, Korea, Sweden, Austria and Belgium. He is currently Director of Research for Answers in Genesis.
For more information on Dr. Andrew Snelling, please go to bit.ly/2zIzOFZ.
----------------------------------------------------
✨ Looking to learn more about Genesis and Creation?
🦕 Visit our blog for helpful articles: bit.ly/3d306R1
🍃 Free Videos: bit.ly/3e1HRgc
🌌 Questions & Answers: bit.ly/3d0EG6T
I've watched a ton of these now, and I just want to let you know that, I used to be a devout evolutionist, and had, over the years, looking at the evidence, come to become a young earth creationist - but always there was nagging doubt. After watching hours of 'Is Genesis History?' I have experienced the elation that comes with confidence, and a deep-seated awe of our Creator and the power at His disposal. So...thank you for that. You've made my life better, and helped turn me from dubious to certain. God bless you, and richly reward you in both this life and the next. Amen.
Amen
🙌🏽
you've moved backward my friend, I'm sorry. Maybe something traumatic happened to you or you were searching for something that was missing missing in your life and so you turned to religion as a comforting mechanism, but I can assure you that you've gone in the wrong direction. I hope I'm not being to condescending but seeing this videos in my recommendations is extremely troubling to me
Thank you for sharing that testimony! Praise God!
@@JB-yb4wn The fool has said in his heart "there is no God."
I'm SO buying the complete DVD set WHEN it comes with subtitles in a Scandinavian language (nor/swe/dan)! This is highly needed, my parents (and others here) don't know English well enough!
You can put your cc setting button and they can read it while they talk in english
@@maryannbeahn6133 no scandinavian language to choose from! they need to work on having subtitles in more languages, because this DVD set is awsome!
Like the old saying, “A fool and his money are soon parted”.
Atheism is such a breath of fresh air.
My life is uncomplicated by the need to bend into a pretzel arguing that my truth is the absolute truth.
Instead, I care about living a good and meaningful life, not because I need to rack up points to get into heaven, but because life is precious.
@@federov100 then why are you watching this? What is being said is much more simple to understand than traditional methods.
Love this! God bless whoever put this channel up.
Wake up! “No evidence of erosion”?? They are STANDING in the erosion.
Asinine
God bless this channel!
or satan, perhaps, since it's obviously false.
@@jonbowman7686 indeed... Satan bless this channel.
Yes , bless them that are lying about what you see in this video.
Love the southwest with all the tabletop mesa with large volumes of material displaced between them. How do you get this much removal of material and leave the canyons and mesa behind? Young earth with catastrophic floods.
I've just found this channel tonight, Thank you so much!
Very compelling!
Very misinterpreted
Not rock , not sedimentary rock that happened years of ago.
Thank You, Jesus, for such men dedicated to Truth!
AMEN TO THAT!
Define Truth.
How does granite form? What flood deposits create marble?
How is there animals and plant remains, hundreds and thousands of meters inside granite?
Gimme some truth on that?
He's ONLY mentioning sandstone because it's a rapidly formed rock... But of all the floods in all the world, and all the sand and soil deposits... Not ONE has formed sandstone. Including areas undisturbed for centuries. Hmmm?
Truth?
Amazing info!
I love all of the work Genesis History does.
Yes. Called by God!
@@howdydoodey3872 Are you referring to your priest of the scientific academia field? They certainly bring people into the worship of materialistic nature. They are so pure and undefiled. They have perfect motivations. They are unaffected by the temptations and faults of mere men. They must be fully trusted and unquestionably followed.
Truly fascinating.
I could never wrap my mind around, millions and millions of years. To know , you and others are out there, believing as I do, just increases my faith in a very Great Creator, that Does what HE Says. 🕊️
So amazing the extent of these layers. There is ample evidence for a global flood.
Not really. There are writings across the globe from the supposed flood era and there is no disruption of writings or any mention of a flood. Also, similar geography across continents is evidence of Pangea, not a flood.
You might think so if you are dogmatically opposed to actual physical evidence. I live in the Great Plains of the USA, 1500 miles from the oceans and 700 from the Gulf of Mexico. Sea shell fossils have been found all over the area. Evidence of "The Flood?" Or verified evidence of geologic changes, from when this was actually an ocean and uplifting of the crust over hundreds of millions of years left sea creatures high and dry?
@@drzaius844 there are over 100 accounts from all over the planet of a global Flood from various cultures and nations which go back throughout history and even the epic of gilgamesh mentions as much albeit it got several details wrong it agrees that one occurred.
@@drzaius844 Funny because all the writings seem to start right when the flood occurred. Almost like, you know, civilization started around that time…
@@TrevoltIV … so if it ‘seemed’ that civilisation started up at the same time in multiple locations straight after ‘the flood’ then it didn’t stem from just 8 people on a single boat in one location?
(Not that your assertion is true, btw.)
This is an exciting channel that educates people with facts and clear understanding. Great job! 😎👍🇺🇸
It educates people to believe lies....
This is not rock, it was never rock but you are taught to call it rock.
@@NOTTHASAME What are you talking about? The Grand Canyon isn't a rock to you?
@@NOTTHASAME
Sounds like someone is triggered that their Evolution religion got debunked!
@@NOTTHASAME Typical atheist IQ level 😂
@@davidnewhart2533, Are you referring to the 1700 “kinds” evolving into several million species when they stepped off the ark?
Wow. This is awesome and I just want to comment how these men aren't sounding confusing arent hard to grasp even though they are talking about stuff that usually sounds boring and hard for me to follow. It is said so simply and easily and precisely and makes more think it's because he is speaking the truth and it's from God.
Thank you for your kind words @honeybeematchmaking! Many blessings to you!
Wait a minute. As far as I have seen the Temple Butte Fm. is a channel-filling unit. This unit is not widespread but rather is found to be filling channels cut down into a lithified Muav Limestone. Same with the Surprise Canyon Fm. where it is mapped as filling channels cut into the Redwall Limestone. So by definition there was a significant amount of time between deposition of the Muav Ls, lithification, uplift and erosion of the limestone and then deposition of the Temple Butte. This cycle of rock formation did not happen in one year, but rather over million s of years.
Wrong !one year !
Awesome segment!
Thank you
Beautiful video. It is indeed obvious that these laminated layers were produced through rapid sedimentation in rapidly flowing water.
You are so far from the truth , why do you think this is sediment ???
Because you are indoctrinated to think it is sediment by academia.
It is not sedimentary rock at all and these layers should be understood by a doctor or one who took biology.
Sorry but you are wrong in identifying this thing called land.
You must be one that paid big money in one of the institutions of BIGGER LIES.
The same people that owns the banks , they own the colleges, they own the news columns , they own big pharmaceutical, they own the military industrial complex .... They set the standards of what you can do or can't do... They own and control your life and you don't even realize it.
@@NOTTHASAME Are you okay?
@@NOTTHASAME Did you just say a biologist should determine the composition of rocks? Bruh
Cordial greeting, you can broadcast these videos with Spanish subtitles for a Cristina page
I love this series.
The critter footprints and the 25 or less degree angles are so obvious that this deposition was by water!
Brilliant and easily understood explanation! God bless you all!
@@badideass that's your bias talking.
@@badideass then explain each point of this video. It's all laid out very clearly.
@@badideass no answer then? Got it. You're just dismissing reality and refuse to look at the evidence presented. That is not a scientific mindset. Don't simply take what you've been told by the larger scientific "community " without critical analysis. There is no satisfactory explanation for the geological layers than rapid, repeated deposition by a catastrophic recent global flood, which is responsible for the vast majority of the geological column and fossil record. Pushing your Creator back as far as you can, even to billions of years away, is a futile attempt to ignore that he's the judge of all the earth and he created us with the opportunity to know him. We're rebellious and need his forgiveness; he will otherwise hold us accountable for our rebellion.
This channel rocks!
I see what you did there...clever..🤣
Currently watching this while riding through the midwest America, past plateaus.
wow!
Grace and peace to you
Gilly wife of Mark
If someone wants to believe in Jesus , the evidence is everywhere. A large bit of our country doesn't want to believe.
Sad but true...
Blessings
I love learning about uniformitarianism. People are surely committed to their own world views (they hate the truth) and probably personal accountability too.
Don't mistake being wrong for being immoral. The vast majority of people who spread misinformation do so because they believe it to be true.
And if you simply dismiss them as malicious, you'll never convince them of the truth.
@@factandsuspicionpodcast2727 convince is never in my job description so no worries
@@skellingtonmeteoryballoon Then you're worse than useless. People like you actively impede the efforts of those of us who do want to convince people of the truth.
Of course, it's your right to be useless. Though, if you're not willing to help with the problem, at least stop complaining about it.
Love these videos
The sandstone is across continents. Because the Atlantic Ocean is younger than the sandstone, ie it didn’t exist yet when the deposition took place. Also it’s not the same sandstone, it’s the same age of deposition, during a protracted period of stability, prior to and during the rifting that eventually lead to the Atlantic Ocean. The rate of opening of the Atlantic is measurable, and extrapolation of how long it has been opening for definitely does not give a ‘young earth’…
It’s measurable TODAY. Not in the past. That’s where you are assuming uniformitarianism and therefore have potential for fault.
You're not taking into account catastrophic earmarks that are all over the globe of receding flood waters. Salinity deposition rates should already have made the Oceans effectively dead seas long ago with patches of "fresh" from runoff and rain. Erosion rates would have long had the entirety of land, especially continents broken down and literally covered in ocean water even within several million years. What are you even talking about? You assume one thing while overlooking so much.
I am from Az, love these formations and this makes sense!
You have no idea what you are looking at in these formations in Arizona.
You see what they want you to see and video's like this are forcing you to see what they want you to see.
The layers are not rock
@@NOTTHASAME kick rocks!
Does it though? Does what they say make sense? Or are you just fond of their conclusion?
This discussion raises several questions:
1. What caused this catastrophe?
2. When did it happen?
3. Where did all the material which now forms the sedimentation layers come from?
4. Given the apparent extent of the catastrophe, most of life on earth would have been killed off.
So where did all the life we now see come from?
Just read Genesis 6-9 and watch the Hydroplate Theory Overview
The breaking up of Pangaea around 175 million years ago causing massive earthquakes that were like nothing we could imagine today and hundreds of super volcanoes and regular volcanoes. The earthquake caused massive tsunamis and the volcanoes flowing into the ocean making alot of steam which then came back in the form of acid rain. And all of the sediment that was deposited came from the original landscape it was just all violently rearranged. It didn't happen in 40 days and 40 nights it happened over the course of years maybe a few years maybe a few thousand years we will never know for sure. Not everything was killed off there were survivers.
@@joshsmith7176 Pangea is a myth. The evidence for a "super continent" is insignificant to the surmounting evidence against it. If at any time the continents were connected it would be due to lower ocean levels which IS supported historically and scientifically. A drop in sea level by 150 meters would connect all the continents with land bridges. The last time this was thought to have occurred was during the last ice age.
@@jrice07
I think Pangea did exist, but the Flood split it apart.
God caused a flood... the bottom of the ocean splits open, lots of plate tectonics, geysers, volcanos, earthquakes and tsunami..... around 4k yrs ago,
The sediments come from the land and ocean floors before the flood. And everything did die this is why you see mass dinosaur graveyards and all the dinosaurs have crooked necks gasping for air but fighting against a current but end up being preserved in the sediment layers brought in by tsunami, also the earth plates moving and causing mountains like rockies to form raise some layers above sea-level but leaving fossils . Only thing left would be Noah, his family and the animals on the ark left. The event lasts for an entire year
Brilliant videos!
After seeing this video, which is stunning, essential, rock-solid information favoring the young age for Earth, I immediately got the entire series of _Beyond Is Genesis History?_
No such thing
@@harrysphincter6496 Would you please explain "No such thing." Did you watch the video?
@@TigeyPuss1 pseudoscience video? No thanks. An extensive amount of VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE available inline or in a public library
@@harrysphincter6496 I guess you have been so thoroughly brainwashed you would never consider another viewpoint. Harry, I wonder if you have ever heard of paraconformities, aka, unconformities. Whether you have or not, would you like to talk about why they are evidence for a worldwide flood rather than slow deposition of millions of years?
@@TigeyPuss1 50 years of education
This one is very good thank you
Great talk.
No truth , just talk .
They don't know the truth or they refuse to tell people the truth !
@@NOTTHASAME They certainly sounded convincing but l appreciate it if folk may see things differently.
another conundrum for young earth believers is this...to believe in young earth means you must believe in young universe. do you believe the universe is only 6 or 7 thousand years old?
Based on Genesis Chapter one, the answer is yes on a young universe. Take note on how God created the Sun, Moon and Stars. There are no Galaxies millions of Light years away. As a matter of fact;watch the Moon on a cloudy night and you will see Clouds pass in front of the Moon and clouds pass behind the Moon. So is the Moon 240,000 miles away?
Amazing, interpretation of evidence. Don't know how a trained geologist could be so full of it.
Another fantastic lecture! Just fantastic. I am so blessed and so happy in my heart that there are men taking time to make these videos! I've Loved geology all my life and all of this makes sense to me and I understand the words but sometimes I don't understand every large concept so I have to reread so to speak the paragraph by rewatching the video. I'm just so glad these are here. Please keep up the good work
@@ozowen5961 then you didn't listen to the lecture
@@ozowen5961 be more specific. Claiming isn't proving. Everything in these videos is proven. You haven't shown anything
Fantastic lies ....
People are hungry for truth but accepting lies that never raise suspicious questions.
This is flesh people.. Biological
@@NOTTHASAME Claiming is NOT PROVING. You MUST offer proof of your claim, like the Professor did or you'll be dismissed. Of course, writing an idiotic statement like "but accepting lies" already trashes any point you may have had anyway.
@@NOTTHASAMETypical miserable atheist always lurking in creationist comment sections seeking to destroy any happiness someone has.
Yeah I'm at 6:42 and it's only getting worse. So these guys are saying that the same catastrophic flood is responsible for laying down all these separate and distinct layers, which would have them needed to harden and dry; yet the same flood was also responsible for carving out the canyon in these rock layers? And why would these layers being played down over a long period of time resulted in jagged formations while a catastrophic event would make straight uniform lines. Hmmm, seems a bit backwards to me.
They are straight lines made at same time. If you have one layer then "millions of years" go by, you would have alot of uneven creatures and other things. Like the water "ripple marks" that have to be preserved RAPIDLY.
@@MichaelAChristian1 so the flood layed down separate distinct layers of different kinds of rock and sediment all at once, all with distinct types of fossils, but also carved the canyon through these layers? I'm honestly not trying to be obstinate, but do you see the many problems with this theory?
@@carolkegel7599 They are invoking miracles to explain how the global flood and young earth flood geology reshaped and formed the geology of the earth.
Whenever I see layering like this, I am interested in knowing where the material came from.
Good point. In the flood viewpoint, it's not hard to understand the violent upheavals moved a _lot_ of rock out of the way. But in the _conventional_ viewpoint, where did it all come from?
@@KenJackson_US If the material isn't from volcanoes (or asteroids Lol) then it must have been deposited from the surface of someplace else, maybe even from the depths of the seas. The eastern mountains in the U.S. - the Appalachians are weathered and heavily forested. Some of the material at Sedona may have come from the east. I've heard a theory that claims that the Appalachians and the Scottish Highlands are the same mountains. If entire continents have been shifted, then I can imagine other geological features being ground to dust and deposited hundreds of miles away, but I don't think plate subduction works that way. Incredible movements of water could do that, but I can't imagine waves like that.
@@timothykeith1367 that hypothesis of the appalcian and scottish highlands being from the same uplift event is wrong. East of the appalacian range is a different mineral composition from the western side, and certainly different from anything around the scottish or scandanavian ranges. The appalacians were formed from uplift when a subcontinent landmass moved into the eastern american plate, much like the indian subcontinent collision with the southern eurasian plate.
A great inland sea as any science book will explain.
@@KenJackson_US
It is not rock in the living stages.
We need to open our eyes to the facts of Science is lying to everyone.
They are guessing and BS people with guessing.
You can't handle the truth about what you see Vs what it actually is .
I have been in that area and there's lots of evidence of aqautic volcanic activity, which I wonder if any of those layers could have been ash suppressed under water.
There's lot's of evidence but it is not volcanic.
I wonder why you think it's volcanic layers ???
Did someone tell you it is volcanic and you jumped on the ride ??
Did you ever take biology to understand the transition of decomposition of the flesh ?
If not, it is evident
@@NOTTHASAME lava flows are usually a solid indicators 🥴
oh yeah ! Im studying this right now, and just looking at how layers were, in a way, actually devided my vulcanic ash is 100% factual, but im not certain about that being so in the Grand Canyon. Its a study deff worth looking into
@@NOTTHASAME - so, u have to be a Biologist to see reason or understand the lecture when one is listening to a Geologist who knows his stuff.
Why would someone need a biology degree to make sense of a geological conversation?
GREAT!!!!
It is refreshing to have COMMENTS. For or against; whatever! I find reading them to be educational.
P.S. I wish all UA-cam videos could have Comments.
AMAZING
These should be shown in schools.... just to give the other paradigm and let the kids deduce truth for themselves.... instead of feeding them nothing but false doctrines.
💋
F*kin’ hell 😂
Love this guy.
What an alarming lack of critical thinking on display in this video. The actual science isn’t that hard to understand, so I’m not sure why you’re bending yourself into a pretzel trying to rationalise an empirically wrong biblical narrative of existence. Good on you for leaving the comments on, I guess.
Water flume experiments have proven that moving water sorts out and deposits sediment layers according to weight, size, and buoyancy - just like the geologic column layers.
As you said the bottom layer rocks are coarser and get progressively finer with each layer, from the sorting process.
@@JB-yb4wn no, it buried them according to their mobility and ability to escape the rising flood waters.
Fossils are found out of sequence all the time - assigning the strata where each fossil is found is arbitrary and meaningless.,
@@JB-yb4wn well yes the ones that got pulverized
We'd like to see an animation of a time-lapsed model of this.
exactly
Have you seen Genesis Apologetics movie?
Makes for interesting thoughts about how old the world really is ?
Well, yes and no. We don't know exactly how old the earth is or the day of the week any specific layer had been laid. However it couldn't have been in just a dozen thousand years. We have dead trees that haven't been fossilised that are older than the flood, and living trees half as old.
John Nelligan it also depends on the Bible you read. Many show the genealogies to go back around 6,000 years with the flood 4,350 years ago. Those come from the Mazoretic texts. Or you can go to the older Greek Septuagint and find the earth is 6,540
Years old and the flood 4,940 years ago.
@@logicalatheist1065 Well You know where to find us. We were live today when you were posting this nonsense yet didnt show up. So ill just take it you have no idea who you are talking too nor what you are saying. Go visit standing for truth youtube channel sometime and go on your rants there.
@@YoungEarthCreation I think everyone needs to pray for the atheists that consistently comment on this site...would they comment on Islamic sites...I doubt it...they are clearly lost and since these are the last days ...time is running out...
2 Peter 3 v 3-7 and Matt 7 v6 are both applicable here....
Grace and peace to you
Gilly wife of Mark
@@markmooney5662I pray that Allah shows you mercy for your blasphemy
I LOVE THESE VIDEOS!!!! Keep em coming!!!
As the Flood that you postulated abated and that erosion of the Grand Canyon occurred, where was the vast volume of material eroded away deposited, and under what conditions?
If the deposits exposed by the Grand Canyon that now make up the Colorado Plateau were freshly deposited as a perfectly flat surface by the Flood, which you say then subsided in a short time, why did the waters flow off the top of the plateau by such a circuitous route, (such as along the meandering Colorado river) cutting sharply down in a limited number of places, and not just flow en masse from the higher ground to the lower by the shortest route (as water always will do) and not cut numerous smaller channels perpendicular to the plateau edge?
Indeed, why is deposition thicker in one place (that 'pancake of flat layers) forming a big bump in the under-flood sea floor in just one part? Finally, if all the mountains were submerged as per genesis, where has all that mass of material of different lithology making up that raised plateau eroded from and what moved it from there to where it was deposited? What was it moved across?
Hi I have a question: were all the continents one land mass when the flood happened? or were they apart? i do believe in the young earth and the Bible... i ve heard of when the earth axis tilted but not sure exactly what happened.. ty
Apart
I think they were one mass, but when the Flood happened the land split apart. The Flood was very sudden and it also covered the land.
There was a documentary my pastor showed us that was talking about the Flood and all the geological changes thag would occur.
Look up the name Peleg in the Bible. Peleg means the day the Earth was divided.
What is your evidence that the Cambrian Tepeats Sandstone of Arizona (film 2:45 to 3:07) has such a wide global extent as claimed at the beginning of the film? The map in the film shows it occurring (for example in northern Africa) where there are pre-cambrian shield rocks exposed on the surface, no Cambrian deposits at all. In 'Southern Israel' the Cambrian sandstones are in a totally different position relative to rocks like the sequence in which the Tapeats formation appears.
Did you trying typing in Sandstone in Africa?
You lads been smoking wackie backie
Yes Truth not pot like u xxxx
From Sydney Australia-
Lord Jesus Christ ,100 percent history -His Story !!! what year is it ? 2021 AD -
Do not lean on your understanding and foolish evil of the world - seek the one and only true and only Wisdom - do ya research for yourself with Humble Heart -2+2 =4 not 5 !!!!
350 prophesies of our Great Messiah , Mashiach and Savior, Jesus Christ in the Old Testament ( start with Isaiah 53 for u that r Jewish )!!
Budha ,Krishna, Mohammed ,Charles Darwin are all dead why would I follow a dead man ???!!
Jesus manifested in human flesh ,was tempted in all areas, but remained sinless and perfect and of servitude in Humility ,to rise from dead -500 people witnessed him in Jerusalem alive for 40 days and many were Martyredand tortured horrifically for their belief in his resurrection !!!! And Christianity spread like wildfire from Jerusalem under Roman occupation , not through oppression but because of the great Love and resurrection of our Great Savior Lord Jesus Christ !!
Don’t Gamble your Soul !!!!
Humbly ask Jesus to reveal himself to you ,if he is real, and cry out from the bottom of your Heart and Soul for Holy Spirit sent down from Heaven to teach u and comfort u In all your ways !!
Humble yourself as God resists the Proud gives Grace to the Humble !
Submit yourself fully to our Lord and Saviour !!
Study to show yourself approved and get righteous Wisdom !! It isn’t a Harry Potter and a gimmick foolish theory of Man !!
Christianity expanded through entire world in very short time and many were martyred for their faith under grievous ,horrific ,conditions because of their Faith ( love servitude they gave for nothing in return) their life was a sacrifice as Jesus was ,which all Christians are called to do !!
Vaste archeological , manuscript Evidence ,internal and literary consistency which is studied at Harvard and Cambridge Universities - I.E - Rock Solid evidence!!!
John3:16-For God so loved the World that he gave his only one and only son that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have everlasting Life !!
But loved his sin and wicked deeds over the Light (sin)
Repent (turn from Sin)for the kingdom of God is at hand ( Jesus and John a Baptist first words )
Jesus is very exclusive and says he is the ‘Only Way Truth and Life to the Father -John 14:6!!!
Get the one and only Godly Wisdom ,in him !!
Humbly ask the Holy Spirit to reveal Jesus to you and get Born again in water and Spirit -John 3:5 !!
Hallelluliah!!!
Turn to our Lord Jesus only
- [ ] Prov. 3 Verses 5 to 6. [5] Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. [6] In all thy ways acknowledge him(submit to him )and he shall direct thy paths
And I suppose he believes the earth is flat too.
This is wonderful. Thank you!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Thanks you. I debate a lot of evolutionists ... and this gave me strength and more faith.
So DID THESE Layers build up under water and these different sediments were flooded in ?
This definitely works if you ignore most of science.
Like what?
By 45 seconds we have the first falsehood.
The vegetation does not indicate that there had been "catastrophic erosion that then stopped." First, the canyon erosion is on going. It is caused by annual floods in the Colorado River fed by melt water from the Rocky Mountains. We in fact did damage the Grand Canyon, and Colorado River ecologies by preventing those floods with massive dams on the river.
I'll make a recommendation of a fact based book;
The Grand Canyon, Monument to an Ancient Earth: Can Noah's Flood Explain the Grand Canyon? by Carol Hill (Editor), Gregg Davidson, Wayne Ranney, Tim Helble. Kregel Publications (April 27, 2016)
The authors are experts, and Christians. They want to teach their fellow Christians that lying is not how to promote the Christian faith.
around the 2,000 bc the Chinese Han Dynasty took a census. In China alone, there were 13.5 million people. That is some serious frisky business to go from 2 people to 13.5 million in a few thousand years. And that was in China along - not the world. Nobody has ever countered this argument. It is not mathematically possible to go from 2 people to over 13.5 million people spread out across the entire globe in just a few thousand years.
Do you remember where you found this information? I’m interested in reading it. I’m curious to know how they calculated that.
Please explain the Great Unconformity at the bottom of the Grand Canyon rock column. Seems like the wearing down of these tilted, very hard, metamorphic rocks to a level plane would have taken more than a single great flood. And as the water rose, these rocks would have been at a great depth and not subject to near surface strong currents. At some point, as the water depth increased, the water column would have become very clear of all but the very finest of sediment.
Thank you for your feedback @thomasballentine9496,
We actually have a video on our channel that discusses the Great Unconformity. It can be viewed here: ua-cam.com/video/EscPPM7Wpjs/v-deo.html
Many volcano domes up in the colorado plateau, localized volcanic activity, mud floods?
You guys should check out the geology of the Ozarks in mizzou
Please explain the multiply cycles of evaporite layers in the Paradox Basin SW of Moab. While you are at it explain the Tertiary laccoliths in the Colorado Plateau.
So all of these layers were set down over 7 days?
Sola scriptura,Sola fide,Solus Christus.
Awesome! Great is Thy Faithfulness LORD Almighty!
It would be good to see a debate with an alternative geologist who holds a conventional old Earth view. Also, explain why there is limestone with fossils atop Everest... How does the geological record on Mars support Young Earth?
Then also why are the Chicxulub crater and now the Deliliquin crater missing from the Genesis record, when these were far more severe events than the Flood? Need some help here please, but no one is answering.
Psalm 104 = catastrophic plate tectonics
@@ITPalGame God has pelted Earth with asteroids - The evidence in their appearance is clear. They are also ancient and predate any people who could write. It also looks like Theia impact created the Moon (vital to humans on Earth) plus left us a heavy metallic set of lumps down near the core of Earth - Again, this is why we have a magnetic pole system plus this gives us protection from solar radiation. The more I learn, the more I thank God.
In summary, the asteroid impacts were huge and were planetary catastrophes. All we need to see is a YEC timeline that includes asteroids and explains why these catastrophes weren't written about. YEC respondents tell me the Flood caused asteroid impacts when it hurled huge lumps of rock into the sky. But they do not explain why the residuals have a different composition, or how these rocks fell back to Earth with a higher speed. Also, a YEC timeline that explains where the heat from plate tectonics friction went.
Given that all the layers were deposited all at once, we would also see animal fossils of the same time period in different layers, right?
@@paulgarrett4474 You are being deceived. The "cambrian explosion" alone disproves that. But then you have all the other fossils like giants and mammals in "wrong layer" for evolutionists.
Someday in heaven or wherever we end up, hoping we have the video and the God given desire to see the details of the Great Flood to see how the earth was reformed afterwards.
There seem to be two different Dr Andrew Snellings in Australian geology, I found this to be a thought-provoking read "Will the Real Dr Snelling Please Stand Up?" by fellow geologist Dr Alex Ritchie. I am also intrigued by the comments about one of these Dr Snellings in the same author's "Flood geology: a house built on sand". What do people think can be the explanation?
This is all secondary. Young or old earth belief will not affect your salvation. Don't let this secondary issue distract and divide us on the primary issue.
Question.. what you guys think about a large comet raining or power washing the earth? Perhaps a very large comet tail raining for months and months? What you guys think?
Great work, I understand belief in God is a matter of faith without evidence, blessed are those who have not seen but believe.
"Who is like The Lord, from everlasting to everlasting HE IS GOD and there is no other". "The fear of The Lord is the beginning of True Wisdom". HE answers those who fear HIM w/loving kindness, mercy, and eternal life. Amen !! Thanks to you both for giving praise and honor to HIM Who lives forever.
Indeed!
We seriously aren’t still talking about this being anywhere near a scientific reality in 2022 are we?
Amazing what mt,saint helens has taught us??
Electrical Discharge Deposition, electro-plating, is the only way to get this type of layering. 13:37, These tracks were made in wet sand, then quickly petrified, electrically.
*Show us where that has been observed...*
This video, literally:
How to look at evidence for an old earth and conclude that it's Young 👌😂
“Orderly deposited layers is clearly evidence for a catastrophic, disorderly flood when everything was shaken up and re-deposited all at once”. Top notch conclusion, that one 😂
The Horseshoe bend is all the evidence you need that the Grand Canyon was not formed quickly. Have a nice day.
What is the age of uranium according to Dr Snelling? Someone said his latest paper said he thought it was millions of years old.
I don't believe he said that and meant it.
Oh my previous comment magically didn’t post. Hmm, keyword auto-delete? Telling… quite simply, these guys are simply and sadly mistaken…
Our planet was one great water ball in the flood year.
What's your take on the massive amount of large scale mining literally worldwide?
The scale appears to be far larger than what exists today.
The topography worldwide looks like mining, slag piles everywhere.
That's one very large advanced civilization.
OK evolutionists, before you comment please actually listen to the whole video. Thank you!
"We can't explain it right now, so God is real." I'm... thinking you.. skipped... a few steps in that logic.
Where did you get this quote from? 😅
God is real
How is this the highlighted comment?
Ok young earthers, how can you explain how an atoll can form in the required timeline?
It is important that we do not start with the assumption that atolls and other reefs were formed at the same rate they are currently growing today. A reef's growth rate is determined based on the balance between constructive and destructive processes in its local environment. If factors such as the temperature and mix of microorganisms in the reef were different, the growth of reefs could have been much faster than at present. Please see the following article for more information:
𝘔𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘔𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘯 𝘙𝘦𝘦𝘧𝘴-𝘍𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘛𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘎𝘳𝘰𝘸 by Dr. John Whitmore
bit.ly/3sOf4F1
Question: These extensive layers that have been deposited rapidly all over N. America, WHERE did all this material come from? we are talking alot Could it have come from space? Been laid down by a passing cloud of celestial debris? I understand we are talking sandstone. Question: what are the sand crystals made of ? No one ever talks about that
how do these sediments harden to rock ?
These organizations have videos, articles showing stuff like this.
We are finding that even fossilization can occur in several weeks given the proper temperature and mineral catalyst content.
Though how did seperated Ash layers get layed flat without contamination of other sediment? Or how did volcanoes flow underwater? And cool slow enough to form crystals?
I think I've heard the progression and recession of water over the land as the waters increased. Mix that with volcanic eruptions and there are ash layers. The earth was not covered instantly and tides or tsunamis would have wrecked havoc everywhere. It would be a similar way we find animal trackways between layers. Just an idea I've heard elsewhere.
Well Ash from mega volcanoes would have been many feet thick and would have compacted itself then would have hardened up with moisture. Mega volcanoes would have produced enough lava to warm the water drastically hot water and miles of cooling lava several yards thick would take along time to cool
@@joshsmith7176 how does ash compact itself into a single layer with no contamination during a raging flood? It doesn't make sense. According to these videos ash should float for a while too right? It's lighter than most the other sediment.
also even if the ocean managed to get super hot (to the point it kills everything in the ocean) It would still cool volcanic rock faster than it could flow. Unless Maybe the water is the same temperature as lava so like 1300°F or more right?
@@matthewklassen806 I'm sorry I missed your comment.
Do you know how many igneous layers exist though there's thousands. That basically means thousands of times that water progressed onto the land & receded from it.
And you're saying it's like trackways because animal tracks also can't form underwater? so logically it couldn't happen in 1 giant flood, Instead it's a series of floods that span a year?
I hope everyone in the comments realizes that in order for any of these creationist "doctors" to get their degrees, they either had to go to a christian school which doesn't count or they had to disregard their religious beliefs to pass their exams
If you did not have the Biblical texts would you still pursue this young Earth conjecture based on available evidence? The Vedic texts for example speak of millions and billions of years. There's no conflict there. I've a feeling you're trying to manipulate the observations to fit the conjecture. I don't think anyone would reach these conclusions absent the Biblical texts. The mentions of a flood in the Qur'an do not appear to refer to a worldwide event.
I'll try to point out as many fallacies, assumptions and falsities as I can, but I'm just an amateur geology fan.
2:24 the size of the coconino formation does not imply that it was created "rapidly". Sedimentary layers formed in a period of relative tectonic inactivity could well have formed over thousands or millions of years without being obstructed (which is what evidence shows)
6:00 At the beginning of the video he admits that we're currently in a slow and stable period of geologic activity, yet here he can't seem to comprehend that such a stable period might have also existed in the past. Also, why would erosion necessarily leave a jagged surface contour? Wind and water running over a sedimentary layer could just as easily leave a smooth flat erosion pattern (which is obviously what happened, as evidenced by the flat layers here)
6:18 A matter of hours??? 😂Care to elaborate how that is possible?
6:36 Ah yes, everyone knows modern sedimentation rates are pretty much exactly the same as they were 250 million years ago
okay sorry I got bored
Holy, Holy, Holy, is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory.
Lmao he mistakes the interior seaway for Noah's flood. He also missed a billion years of erosion in the Grand canyon. I'm not watching any more. Y'all believe something. I'm gonna verify.
USGS has a map to illustrate 3 proposed Yellowstone eruptions, which were supposed to have occurred over a few million years. The map of all three eruptions has Arizona covered with layers of Yellowstone ash. I see NO EVIDENCE of Yellowstone ash in the sedimentary layers in the Grand Canyon. The Canyon is clear, and wide open. If the Yellowstone map, and eruption dating, were correct, the Grand Canyon would show obvious evidence of volcanic material. Secular geologists must surely know this, and I wonder how they manage to remain blind to this problem. This tells us two things. First, at least some of the geologists at USGS must know they are being untruthful. Second, they have no idea when the Yellowstone last erupted (at the time of the flood?) so all their reassurances are bogus.
_"USGS has a map to illustrate 3 proposed Yellowstone eruptions, which were supposed to have occurred over a few million years. The map of all three eruptions has Arizona covered with layers of Yellowstone ash."_
Where can I find this map? I only know of a scientific paper that shows ash deposits of the Yellowstone eruptions in Idaho, Wyoming and Montana. (Swallow et al, 2019, "The Huckleberry Ridge Tuff, Yellowstone: evacuation of multiple magmatic systems in a complex episodic eruption")
_"I see NO EVIDENCE of Yellowstone ash in the sedimentary layers in the Grand Canyon."_
Why would there be ash layers from the Yellowstone eruptions within the Grand Canyon layers? These three eruptions took place within the last 2.1 million years. The youngest and therefore upmost layer of the Colorado Plateau in which the Grand Canyon lies is the Kaibab Limestone which is 270 million years old. So anything below that has to be older.
(Edit: The Kaibab Limestone is only the youngest layer in the Grand Canyon Section of the Colorado Plateau. At other places there are younger layers like the Moenkopi formation or the Chinle formation but which are still way older than the Yellowstone eruptions.)
_"The Canyon is clear, and wide open."_
And it has a river within it that transports everything away that is not part of the massive rock of the Colorado Plateau. That means if the Yellowstone ash ever reached the GC at all.
@@7inrain the map of the three proposed eruptions has been around for decades. There is no way around this error. Geology was ruined as a science by the Nazis and Darwin's popular, pseudoscience books being dragged into academia, to justify exterminating the Jews, and whole tribes in Africa. The Yellowstone, and all the supervolcanoes likely erupted during the rapid tectonic shift that caused the flood. You can Google the map. It's on many websites.
@@valerieprice1745 Maybe what you mean is a map how far the ash from those eruptions travelled. That does not necessarily mean that you will find ash deposits today in all those places.
Take the Mt. St. Helens eruption. After it happened you had maps about how far its ash was distributed. Will you still find this ash today? Only in some places, mostly in the direct neighbourhood of Mt. St. Helens. In most other places the ash has been washed away by rainfall or blown away by wind, depending on how thick the ash layers initially were.
But I can't really tell as long as you don't give me an example where I can find the map you referenced. As UA-cam usually doesn't accept external links maybe you could give me the exact title of a webpage for me to google it.
4:45 .. straight knife edge featureless boundaries" ...like what you would see from a river constantly eroding a semi-flat landscape over millions of years. ...
The river can't go uphill nor can it explain your lack of evidence of "millions of years" between the layers. And then you have the layer of rock going past the canyon.
Hard to imagine but imagine you must