Nikon D610 / D600 vs Canon 6D Epic Shootout Comparison
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- Now Available!
MAVEN Color Coded Photography & Videography Filters - Wave 2
Introducing Dark Polarizers, Variables, Graduated NDs, Infrared 720, Starry Focus, New Cap, NDs, & More!
www.kickstarte...
****************************************************************
Please share if you would like to see more like this! (Note: Very much worth seeing in 1080p HD!)
This is my long awaited review of the Nikon D600( also applies to the Nikon D610) vs the Canon 6D in an Epic, side to side shootout testing some of the most important aspects of the two cameras. As I mention on the video, these are 2 very different cameras. D600/D610 is better as an "all round" camera, the 6D excels in low light (wedding photographers are going to love the 6D).
You can check out the Crash Course DVDs I have for both cameras on my products page, they are available both as DVD & immediate download: www.michaelthem...
* Michael The Maven is a participant in the B&H Photo affiliate program that provides an advertising commission if you purchase through these links.
Purchase the Nikon D610: www.bhphotovide...
Im sure there will be plenty of criticism about this comparison, and my intent is to inform my viewers the best that I can about both cameras to the best of my ability. Something I wanted to do was actually show you (evidence) how I came to the conclusions I did, instead of just reading sheet specs. It was a lot of work. If there are mistakes I have made & I imagine there will be, I will do my best to point these mistakes out. I am making a very serious effort to improve the quality of both the information and method of presenting, so I thank you for your support!
UPDATE:
The Bright Target 1 on the wall measured at 6.5 EV
The Dark Target 2 on the ground measured at -1.0 EV
Blog Article on JPEG Image Comparisons for those interested:
www.michaelthem...
Ill be posting extra notes on the testing and files on my blog soon.
Purchase Nikon D610 here: www.bhphotovid...
Purchase Nikon D600 here: www.bhphotovid...
Purchase Canon 6D here: www.bhphotovid...
11 years on this video is still helpful. Thank you for the time and effort you spent all those years ago. Fantastic video.
So true, I'm literally trying to decide between these two or a D750 😂
It took me 3 months to decide which one to buy. Finnaly I bought the D610 and I am really happy. I am wedding photographer and I often need the extremely good dynamic range of the D610 to push shadows without introducing noise
Yeah man the canon cameras succ at dynamic range
@@supercuber9805 In terms of dynamic range and color depth, Nikon D610 leaves all canons far behind!
And also in terms of working ISO, Nikon D610 is higher than Canon EOS 6D.
In general, Nikon D610 scores 94 points, and Canon EOS 6D only 82 points, this is a huge gap!!!
Nikon D610 Color Depth 25.1 Dynamic Range 14.4 Working ISO 2980
Canon EOS 6D Color Depth 23.8 Dynamic Range 12.1 Operating ISO 2340
Even Nikon crops, DD and color depth are higher than this Canon !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Best comparison video by MILES. Truly unparalleled work. Serious Props, Michael!
You just changed my decision on my purchase Mike. Thank you so much. I want to shoot landscapes and low light city scenes at night. I was going to stay away from the Canon 6D because I've read about the terrible auto-focus. You proved that to be untrue. I'm now choosing the 6D and I owe you. I'll be purchasing your training video on the 6D. It's a keeper for us night shooters.
Thank you for your support Steve - I really appreciate it!
In terms of dynamic range and color depth, Nikon D610 leaves all canons far behind!
And also in terms of working ISO, Nikon D610 is higher than Canon EOS 6D.
In general, Nikon D610 scores 94 points, and Canon EOS 6D only 82 points, this is a huge gap!!!
Nikon D610 Color Depth 25.1 Dynamic Range 14.4 Working ISO 2980
Canon EOS 6D Color Depth 23.8 Dynamic Range 12.1 Operating ISO 2340
Even Nikon crops, DD and color depth are higher than this Canon !!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are very mistaken, Canon EOS 6D is much worse than Nikon D610, especially for landscape!
I bought Canon EOS 6D couples of months ago.
Before buy DSLR CAMERA, I have done many research. But after watching this video, I was able to make decision to buy Canon EOS 6D. This is very helpful to me. I still watch this video.
Thank you Michal
По динамическому диапазону и глубине цвета Nikon D610 оставляет далеко позади все каноны!
А также по рабочему ISO Nikon D610 выше, чем Canon EOS 6D.
В общем, Nikon D610 набирает 94 балла, а Canon EOS 6D всего 82 балла, это огромный разрыв!!!
Nikon D610 Глубина цвета 25,1 Динамический диапазон 14,4 Рабочий диапазон ISO 2980
Canon EOS 6D Глубина цвета 23,8 Динамический диапазон 12,1 Рабочий диапазон ISO 2340
Даже кроп Никон, ДД и глубина цвета выше, чем у этого Кэнона!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for making this video and going in-depth on crucial differences between D600 and D60. I am looking forward to what you might have to say about the differences between the new D610 and 6D.
Great work Michael. Not sure if someone has said this already, but with regard to low-light performance, your findings (6D being the winner) only apply to JPEG. -In RAW, D600 is easily one stop better. I recently shot with both. I think the Canon's jpeg rendering engine has a better & more efficient noise reduction & sharpening algorithms. -Which totally explains the superior video performance as well.
In terms of dynamic range and color depth, Nikon D610 leaves all canons far behind!
And also in terms of working ISO, Nikon D610 is higher than Canon EOS 6D.
In general, Nikon D610 scores 94 points, and Canon EOS 6D only 82 points, this is a huge gap!!!
Nikon D610 Color Depth 25.1 Dynamic Range 14.4 Working ISO 2980
Canon EOS 6D Color Depth 23.8 Dynamic Range 12.1 Operating ISO 2340
Even Nikon crops, DD and color depth are higher than this Canon !!!!!!!!!!!!!
You do the best camera comparisons on UA-cam, great job!
it helps me a lot to buy used equipment here in Brazil where we have problems of abusive price on imported equipment
This is the best comparison video I have seen. It's apparent a lot of work went into creating it. Thank you!!!
Ridiculously thorough review. As I D600 owner, I completely agree with your assessment of the camera. I find the D600 excels at portraits and landscapes, does well with casual filming (family, trips, etc) in daylight, but struggles when filming low-light video (using my 50mm 1.8 or 24-70 2.8); I also *hate* how you can't change the aperture in live view.
My other gripe is Nikon's refusal to acknowledge the oil splatter issues and how they devalued the D600 so quickly after its release by releasing the D610 - which seems to exist solely to resolve the shutter issue. I've cleaned my sensor a couple times now and thankfully it has worked out well, but having to do this frequently might get old quickly.
Other than that, I'm quite happy with my D600. If I was going to do shoot a lot of DSLR video, especially in low light, I'd definitely go with a 5Dmk3, no question about it.
Mike, your video shows me that the 6D is worth the money and that makes me want to buy it and make my 60D the backup. I am not a PRO, but I love shooting and mostly landscape, town scenes. Thanks for a wonderful shootout video
This video was an incredible comparison. As a low light 6D user I was happy to see your results. Makes me feel much more comfortable with my choice.
I've seen many reviews in different forms about these 2 camera's. But this is without a doubt the best one! I believe this is the only review people need to see to understand the major differences between the camera's. Thank you so much for this review and keep up the good job! Good luck !
Great job! Thanks for all the work that went in to this.
Awesome, thorough job Michael. Nice to see a good balanced review! I shoot both Nikon (D600) and Canon (60D) because they each have their strengths, in line with your observations.
Good question. I only tested focus speed in low light, so its hard to say what the difference is in good light.
Hello Michael, many thanks - your testing in comparison is really great. I do use the Nikon D600 and I am all about satisfied, I am not a Pro so to say, but I do photography for nearly 40 years now. Many thanks to you and your work. Really good.
I bought a used D610 in 2021 and it rocks!
I really do want to appreciate the effort you made for the comparison, for these full frame SLR's. And this video helped me a lot to consider the pros & cons on these two Full frames and gave me a in-depth view. Once again thanks a lot Michael.
Great video Michael!
This video has been a big help in determining which one to get. I'm going to pick up the 6d next month (and yes I'll be picking up your Crash Course video for the 6d)
One piece of info that was missing I thought was where each camera is manufactured. From what what I was reading the d600/610 is manufactured in Thailand, where the 6d is manufactured in Japan. I'm not saying/implying the Nikon is poorly made at all , but for some people where products are manufactured plays a part in the decision process. It would be appreciated if you could include that information in future videos, or mention it in the video description.
Thanks again for a great comparison video!
Micheal, your comparison review is awesome.
It is in full detail and technical comparisons are beyond perfect!
Thanks a lot.
Waiting for your further 'pro' reviews.
I am one more time happy to select Canon 6D again. : )
Thanks for the Review Michael, I love the straight-forwardness of the video, and the depth review. I am a canon user, but Canon / Nikon, I think both are really great cameras, even the entry level, both are performing very well. thanks!
This was such a great review! Thanks a lot for making this video, the 1080p was awesome for seeing the difference between the two cameras. I've made up my mind now and will go with the 6d, for both reasons in your video and for where each is manufactured.
Probably the most helpful review of any camera I've seen on UA-cam. You deserve to be the top of the search bar when someone searches "D600 vs 6D"
Got mine 6D mark1 in 2023. Love it for my own fun time
Thanks for the great review/comparison. For me personally the Canon 6D was the winner, as I prefer to shoot in natural /dimm lichting. Keep up the good work!
Thanks Michael!! I think I'm going with the 6D, Impressed with the low light performance and the low light focusing... nice review by the way! both are great cameras.
Thank you for your support Marco!
1. Depends on who you ask and how you are shooting. For experienced users it isnt a deal breaker.
2. Currently you cannot start/stop video recording with the EOS App. I imagine that will change in updates.
Thanks!
Thank you. She has her own channel on UA-cam under the name Annie Red.
Yes, you can do both on the 6D in Live View for both Video and Stills.
Beautiful comparison. Its very usage vased and practical.. More important than MANY MANY technical based comparisons. And adress some very important facts directly.
Excellent and serious test. Congratulations and thank you. And I specially appreciated that fact that you didn't was afraid to mention the nasty sensor spot issues on the D600 that Nikon tried to hide! To bad I didn't knew that before I bought it! I already sold it, and all my trust in Nikon went down.
Exactly! This is what I was going for, actual use and results, not just a spec sheet read.
He looks like the bald guy from Brazzer, nice comparsion tho ;)
Really enjoyed your in depth review, bang on and to the point, no bs. Keep up the great coverage. Will tune in for more
Great review. A couple of things to add though:
For those of us who use strobes and shoot on 200mm lenses or longer, the Canon 6D cannot sync flash units with a shutter speed faster than 1/160. Every other modern prosumer DSLR worth considering can sync at least 1/200th (including the Nikon D600). Doesn't sound like much, but it makes a huge difference when you're used to being able to shoot at 1/200th with a flash/transciever. Also for those with less than steady hands and no blessing of IS, this means you won't be within the reciprocal rule when you shoot anything longer than 160mm. This DOES make a difference.
Secondly, the 5Dmkiii has a built in anti-aliasing filter which made it look better in that aliasing and moire test. However the compromise is sharpness. Manufacturers actually put in these aliasing filters because aliasing actually adds sharpness to a STILL image (and also to video, but it wasn't meant for that, obviously). But when people discovered they could shoot full-frame HD video on the 5Dmkii, everyone would complain about the aliasing/moire. This was Canon's solution for the 5Dmkiii. But you really do lose sharpness. People (Philip Bloom) says you can go into adobe software and add sharpness and it looks good, but I'm not a fan of adding sharpness in post. It's always better to do things right in the field and THEN come back into Lightroom or Photoshop (or FCP).
Thirdly, it would have been cool to see the uncompressed Nikon footage in the dynamic range test and the low-light/high-ISO tests. But since the 6D doesn't have that option and this was a comparison video, that footage probably wouldn't belong in this video.
Overall, good video. Seems like you spent a lot of hard work and time into these tests. Keep it up!
Thanks for the review! very in depth and answering pretty much all the questions I had. but man, each one has its pros and cons, Ill try to hold out another year or two with what I have, hopefully the brands learn more from each other and make one that has everything the other one is missing. again, awesome review
This is simply the BEST side-by-side comparison I've seen thus far of the two cameras. Just impressive. Way to go, Michael.
There was a RAW ISO test with banding and you are correct that the NR for jpegs helps significantly.
I started photography with Sony cyber shot as a hobby and than bought a Pentax k10 then during my armature years I bought the canon 50D and now I'm thinking of joining the Nikon family! I am a professional graphic designer but always been taking photos as hobby and few paid photography projects. Loving all the reviews here and I feel quit convince I'll be happy joining the Nikon family soon :) thanks for the wonderful in depth reviews! A new sub :)
Such a thorough, awesome video, thanks for sharing your time and knowledge! I had just bought a 6D days ago and learned a lot about it throughout this video. I use the 5D3 at work and wanted a FF cam for my personal use, the 6D fit the bill perfectly.
Fantastic review--I'm eying the 6D and this is the most detailed and interesting (with real life tests) that I've seen. Great work!
There might be a misunderstanding. The D600 wasn't just slow in low light on low contrast targets without it's AF lamp.... it was unable to focus entirely. It did fine on the other 3 tests. If you don't ever turn your AF lamp off, it wont be an issue.
I answered this, I said they are very comparable (meaning similar) and I was very specific in my video as to what I said. I focus on how the cameras are different. If the D600 and 6D are similar in RAW, and the 6D is better in JPEG ISO noise, how would that make the D600 be a better camera in RAW? If anything the 6D has the edge in higher ISO on RAW but I didn't see it as significant enough to mention. That not misleading, that focusing on how the cameras are significantly different.
Thank you Michael for making such an informative video. It compares well the pros and cons of the two cameras. Frankly speaking, your video has put me in dilemma. I use to shoot in films and my whole set up is based upon Pentax. Since, Pentax is not getting a full frame body, and also film processing and printing is history, I have no option but to move to digital. My photographic skills have grown around the format of 36 mm by 24 mm. So, it is close to impossible to downgrade myself with APS-C crop sensor. The two models that you compared are the cheapest full frame DSLR, yet not so cheap. My interest are in candid street photography and most of the time I work on 400 ISO. Sometimes, I do shoot in low light. I have couple of questions for you, if you do not mind. (1) Depending on the type of photography I do, which camera body shall I go for?; (2) Do the Canon 6D offers simulated Yellow, Green, Orange and Red filter while shooting monochrome?; (3) Do the 39 focusing points in the viewfinder of Nikon D600 appears obstrusive while composing a shot, as compared to 11 focussing points of Canon 6D?; (4) Which viewfinder was noticeably brighter? Please guide me on this.
I agree, In the field shooting is very different. DXO's scores on ISO are in favor of the D600, but when we read the fine print their ISO test also includes a benchmark for dynamic range & color bit depth, which doesn't make any sense. Testing the Dynamic Range, Color Depth and ISO Noise are 3 different things, not one. Additionally their score says nothing of higher ISO levels. I like the D600's dynamic range - it is impressive. Likewise the 6D's low noise in higher ISOs is equally impressive.
Sensational comparison. I have a nikon, but the noise always bothered me enough, after this video I have no more doubts. thank you.
A very interesting and comprehensive review as a Canon fanboy your results confirm what I have been thinking. The 6D spec is not only limited but that in trying to drive the price down or/and make Canon maximum profits they have damaged the ONLY area they still lead Nikon - overall video quality. Its clear to me that if I'm serious about FF DSLR video I have three choices - buy a 5D3, wait for (yet another) new Canon FF that does deliver - lets call it a 6D2 or begin to change back to Nikon
I did indeed test the outer focus points as well, they all failed in these conditions on both cameras. The 6D's center square is the only one that has low light performance.
This sounds right. Actual noise on RAW files out of both cameras were much more comparable. It seems the 6D's advantage is mainly in JPEG and Video (which is a form of JPG) and more so when ISO noise reduction is turned on (again it is only applied to JPG). That said, the ISO clean up on the 6D is better than Ive seen on any other Canon camera.
Man, I am in 50% of this video and if I could I would have hit the like button 10x. This is by far the best review of these cameras. Congrats
This is the first honest comparison I've seen of 6D vs D600
IMHO technical specs are useless. I prefer to read the true experience of the cameras use
Thanks Michael!
The best, detailed and professional video comparison for both cameras!!! Excellent job!!!!
Depends on who you talk to. I believe they are completely usable in some circumstances.
Im not sure what monitor you are watching on & see what you like- thats why it is there for you. But side by side, at higher ISOs...I think we are seeing very different things.
Mike, great review! I purchased a 6d and couldn't be happier. What I do find ridiculous though is comparing these two cameras simply because Nikon chose to call its camera ENTRY LEVEL. Other than the price, there's nothing entry level about the camera. In my estimation, is a cheaper d800. The Canon on the other hand is truly an entry level, full frame camera. Simplified features for those who don't wanna deal with the learning curve of the d600 or 5d MK III. I
A big thanks for the hard work you have done,Great review.
everyone should now have knowledge of what they are going for.
As for me I'm sticking with Canon because of all the L glasses
I invested. There are both great cameras.
Thanks again, great job.
This is a wonderful review, very profoundly. I appreciate the time you got into making this! I'll recommend this to my friends, who might still be struggling over the 6D issues, as I was before watching the video. Now I've ordered one right away. Thanks Michael.
Thank you Mike so much for making these videos! Absolutely love the comparisons you make and tutorials. Saves so much time.
and i thought that 34 minutes of review is soooo looooong! but you proved me wrong.. awesome review specially the video modes.. i have a 5d2 and searching for a back up camera. headphone jack of d600 is awesome.. but changing the aperture during video recording is VERY important to me. And that ISO test is PHENOMENAL! thank you very much for this.
Came to watch the video to fall in love with the 6D, but I ended up falling in love with the blonde.
*Simp*
🙄🙄🙄
I just wanted to say that your work on the comparison is simply phenomenal. You covered every possible aspect I care or could thing about and you did it in my opinion in a very professional way.
I’m going for the canon one but it was really a no brainer for me since I almost never shoot sport/actions shots and most importantly I have glass for canon.
Anyway again thank you for this great shootout comparison
Hi Michael! Thanks a lot for your work! The amount of time and efforts behind this video is tremendous
GREAT test results Michael.....thank you so much for taking the time to do it. You think the 6D might have some upcoming updates to correct some of their focusing issues? I know the Mark III did have some updates regarding focusing
I think your comparison is fair enough.... and most detail I ever seen...
It will better again if you add d800 or d800e as well!
Thumb up for this!
I hope the 6D has the focusing system of the 7D. It would be perfect!!!! I do own the 7D and i would miss its features. Maybe i'll just try to save more to go for the 5d mkiii. Very great comparison. Very professional and unbiased. Keep it going.
For a first time user, I like the D3200 more. I have both the D3200 and the D5200, while the flip out monitor is cool and it has better focusing squares, its not worth the extra $300.
One of the best camera reviews I've ever seen. That's the way it's supposed to be done. If I buy either one of these cameras, I'm gonna get your guide. thx Michael.
Perfect profi review.This is real test which show you everything about cams.
This is an awesome review...thank you...so Canon it is.
suspect this is already been said, but at 23:00 w/ the girl and tree background, comparison ISO and softness on the 6D, the difference, at least in the example shown, is the focus point; ISO 400 that looks sharp has girl in focus, ISO 25600 has tree in focus.
Low light performance: go with Canon
Frame rate, focus speed/focus point grouping: go with Nikon
Image quality is essentially the same if you shoot in RAW (skin tone difference becomes quite neglectable due to simple post processing).
I went with a d610. Haven't looked back. Then again, I shoot nature, street and events. Which ever you pick I'm sure you'll be happy with it.
I dont remember publishing a RAW high ISO test here. Lets see there was JPEG (which includes ISO Noise Reduction), Video (provided & obvious) and RAW banding test (which tests for lines in RAW not noise). The language, descriptions and titles are pretty precise, you might want to watch that part again.
Yes! Its coming!
Hell of a video. I have more doubts between which one to choose now, but learned a lot about both cameras. Impressive tests! Thanks for sharing this info!
The best and very informative review EVER! Keep it up dude.
If you are shooting weddings (stills only) the 6D is more than plenty. If you are shooting any video, go with the 5Diii.
One feature (not mentioned by Michael) that I think is phenomenal for discreet street photography is the outstanding silent mode of the 6D. It is, of course, not as quiet as my old Leica M6, but it is far better than any DSLR I have ever used. The size of the 6D, its low-light focusing capabilities, great high-ISO noise and silent mode all contribute to making it the best street photography reflex.
Outstanding review. Thank you for taking the time! I did a shorter pros and cons review of the Canon 6D a few weeks ago. I do a lot of nigh photography and came to the same conclusion. I love the low-light capabilities of the 6D.
Michael, thanks very much for your video. I am from China, and I never own a DSLR before. I am Struggling between Canon 6D and Nikon D610/D600 for a long time. Your video is really helpful to me.
Nikon D610! I just bought one a week ago and I couldn't be happier. Keep in mind that this review covers only the D600 and "some" of the issues are gone in the D610.
buy an entry level body, get yourself a pro lens to pair it with. camera body's come and go. pro lenses stick with you and have good resale value.
__DarkBubble__ You are right. D610 is my first option now. I really like it after touched and used it in the biggest digital shopping center in Shanghai last week. I think I will buy it soon.
littlewing62 Thanks for your advice. I did think of this way. My budget may only afford D610 kit (AF-S 24-85mm/3.5-4.5G ED VR). So the question really comes to buy entry level body+pro lens VS. D610 kit. I really like D610 body after using it in the digital shop. So I guess I will just follow my feel, buy it and stick with it for a while. Then upgrade to pro lens later.
kit lens is not a bad place to start with. specially if you're building your lens collection for full frame bodies. if you get the kit, get yourself a prime lens so you can start learning and experimenting. it's really just the start of your expenses, then a tripod, camera bag, extra battery, flash, cards, filters hehe. good luck and start shooting.
How can you make a so comprehensive comparision. You are brilliant.!!!
That’s a lot of work doing this kind of comparison. Best ever I’ve seen! Thanks for that, it cleared my thoughts and I will get 6D.
Great unbiased review! This is what should a camera review be, reviewing those on real world situations. Good job! =)
Much of what is "better" really depends on the person's individual opinion. As I said, the raw banding is at least 1-2 stops better, yes, but someone else might look at the same images and disagree with me, or even say they are better or worse. I can definitely say however, if you shoot a lot of JPEG & video in those ranges, you will definitely see a huge difference, especially at 6400.
Excellent work! I wish all camera comparisons were that thorough and honest.
Excellent and best review on D600 and 6D. Oil / dust issue on D600 alone provides the evidience of poor quality control of Nikon, and it's a real shame. The camera is just not worth the money if this issue is there.
I was not ref. to your video when speaking of the "supposed 6d high iso noise 2 stops advantage over the d600", In fact like I mentioned before ur test was quite thorough and very informative. It clearly help me decide which of both of this cameras to pick up.
Uh...I did point out that fact (@14:50). I also showed the performance of the D600 with (@12:56), without it's AF light (@14:31), and the 6D "out of the box" (@12:16) with no AF assist. I also summarized the winners under different circumstances (@17:12). You are complaining about things that are clearly explained. So, no you didn't watch the video.
The D600 is a better all round camera (minus the oil spots). Pros will LOVE the low ISO noise and low light focusing on the 6D.
Thanks for posting such a well-produced comparison video. I'm a Nikon shooter. Have considered buying the D600. The dreaded oil spots problem put the kybosh on that idea. Am waiting on reviews on new Nikon D7100. I hope you will review it.
Good comparison however the D600 cannot really be compared to the D610 as the D610 has a new shutter mechanism, faster frame rate and modified auto white balance as well as improved auto focus.
Just a heads up for anyone thinking of purchasing a D610.
Jonathan, I'm in a major doubt about D610 or 6D. My objective it's to photograph concerts. The ISO definitely is important. Do you have experience with the D610 or 6D?
***** After weeks of debate I have literally just sat back down at my desk after visiting Camera World in London and buying a D610. Victor I am by no means an expert however it comes down to many things not just the body. In the past I have done some night club gigs and the low light was definitely a challenge and I was shooting portraits. If you are a current DSLR user then it comes to glass what do you have already and what are you willing to spend etc... etc...Ideally you are going to want some glass with low F stops (zooms if you got the cash, or primes) then ISO doesn't become as much of an issue. I know know the D610 has an ISO auto which gives you an edge but it depends where you sit yourself in the experience scale you may not need this. Again this is a big question and is not just a comparison between D610 and 6D but a Nikon Vs Canon, lens vs lens, flash vs non flash. Sorry but even with your exact circumstances I am not able to help as it comes down to personal preference on how you like your images to look.
Thanks man!
Viewfinder only is straightforward, no issues. 5Dii's video compares similarly to the 6D.
Wow! Excellent review, this must have been a ton of work.
What do you mean by "misleading"? Are you saying the D600 should be afforded a handicap because it is native only to 6400? Im confused by your comment.
bar none the most comprehensive 6D review on youtube. kudos and thank you
Thanks for the quick reply! If possible, can you post the RAW high ISO comparison pictures too? It might help the RAW shooters, whereas the JPG results are a bit misleading. I'm not sure how much difference this makes, but the Nikon sensor is only native up to 6400, (12800 and 25600 are boost), while the 6D is native up to 25600 I think.
Thanks again!
Best comparison between camera's EVER
One of The best comparison I have seen on UA-cam.
Great job !!!
RIght now I own a D7100 and looking to upgrade to a full frame... the main reason is the bad low-light performance, common for a crop sensor. I am trying to compare D610 vs 6D and this is is an amazing pro video you made. At this stage, I am shocked how poor the D610 can perform in low light compared to 6D...
+Radu D It looks like it depends.... This video seems to compare JPEG shots. I shoot in RAW, and if you compare the RAW files, the Nikon handles high ISO noise just as well if not better than the Canon. Check it out www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-D610/12
This really should be clear in the video. The Canon has a better onboard image processor to reduce JPEG noise. But if you're shooting RAW and editing your photos with something like lightroom you can reduce noise just as well (which results in a softer image, of course).
+ErsatzSimulacrum I went for the 6D... like 6weeks ago, I didn't had much time to use it but I made some portraits, landscapes, macro and I love it. I love the colors, I love that the camera knows what to do in aperture priority mode and get better results compared to D7100. I am sure each camera has pros and cons but I found the one for me :)