One more magnificent symphony. This masterpiece touches us deeply in our soul not only for the lyricism but for the sensitivity, I think nobody can be indifferent to this marvelous music. The direction and the orchestra performance are exceptional. Viva Haydn and his amazing talent and musicality. Bravo for this glorious recording.
Ha Yes! There's so much mischief in Haydn -but this IS a superb masterpiece of construction -my favourite Haydn symphony -and didn't Beethoven nick the opening theme of the 2nd movement for the finale of his 6th? Okay he switched it around a bit, but....
Haydn is stronger in these later symphonies. Much of the earlier ones come across as light, run of the mill classicsl fluff. Except for maybe Symphony #53 and #60. Where you have a grand slow introduction followed a miderate to fast section. Which is how I like my Haydn.
The interpretation by The Orchestra of the 18th Century, conducted by Frans Brüggen. They play on original or copies of original instruments. Timebased instruments, one could say. The orchestra has the habit of doing a lot of research in history of music. Hence Orchestra of 18th century.
Actually, they are about a semitone LOWER than TODAY'S STANDARD. Your expectation, that there was a standard pitch in Haydn's time, and it was identical with today's standard is wrong. In Haydn's time there was no uniform standard. In Haydn's time almost surely this symphony was NEVER played at a'=440 Hz.
They are using baroque tuning, about A=415. It is about one half-step flat of the modern A=440 standard. A=415 was more or less the standard in Haydn's time.
@@willduan4869 It is "odd" that in a tuning system, you can pick any arbitrary tuning frequency and then simply adjust the other adjacent notes to be equidistant from each other (percentagewise such as 5.9% spaced in pitch), based on that reference point. For example, A4 can be 440 Hz but it can also be 415, 432, 444, or basically ANY reasonable frequency. Personally, I think music should be based on A as the start of the octave, not C. I don't see the logic in using C as the crossover points from 1 octave to the next. I would have started with A0 = close to 14 Hz and build from there, then the longest pipe on a pipe organ would be about 37 feet (about 11.2m) instead of about 32 feet (about 9.7m). It would be awesome to hear that low A rumble a church, perhaps stacked with an A1 = 27.5 Hz. However, being an exact multiple of the "bad" 7 Hz frequency which is supposed to be bad for our bodies, perhaps 14 Hz should be used sparingly like at the end of the mass, that way if people start dropping like flies, the people that survived can exit the church and make room for the emergency people to come in with body bags.
@@willduan4869 The D natural that they play is not quite the same as a modern C#/Db so it is not a half step off. I am wondering if they are using A = 432 Hz tuning system.
The bassoonist is awesome on this recording. Both in the first and second movements. Love it!
One more magnificent symphony. This masterpiece touches us deeply in our soul not only for the lyricism but for the sensitivity, I think nobody can be indifferent to this marvelous music. The direction and the orchestra performance are exceptional. Viva Haydn and his amazing talent and musicality. Bravo for this glorious recording.
13:06 The sound of Spongebob's alarm clock
Spongebob: Today's the big day, Gary!
Gary: Meow!
Spongebob: Look at me! I'm NAKEEEEEEED!!!!
You made my day! Hahaha.
Love the tempo. Beautiful.
21:30 - 21:53........passion, followed by melody. Ahhhhhh
I'm more of a romantic period guy, but I've got to say that I still thoroughly enjoyed this symphony.
Oh gotta love the bassoon fart towards the end of the second movement.
samdajellybeenie Indeed, this bass note of the bassoon at the end of the second movement sounds like a frightful fart.
Probably why this symphony has no nickname - the obvious one was too rude! 😉
Ha Yes! There's so much mischief in Haydn -but this IS a superb masterpiece of construction -my favourite Haydn symphony -and didn't Beethoven nick the opening theme of the 2nd movement for the finale of his 6th? Okay he switched it around a bit, but....
@@peterbently1533 Yes!
From this day forward, I shall always think of the of the 93rd as'The Fart' The 94th was 'The Surprise' Whatever next?
I love the bassoon in the 2nd movement 👍🏼
Mi sinfonía favorita de Haydn, gran interpretación....👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Thanks for uploading!
brilliant brilliant brilliant.
Wonderful.
Great.
O M G ❤ i love
period instruments
thanks for posting this. Glorious.
Sehr toll! Love it!
Yaaay! Thanks for posting this :D
W O W I hope they have
amazing stereo in Susanna's
new car ❤ ❤
Bravi tutti. Benissimo !
Haydn is stronger in these later symphonies. Much of the earlier ones come across as light, run of the mill classicsl fluff. Except for maybe Symphony #53 and #60. Where you have a grand slow introduction followed a miderate to fast section. Which is how I like my Haydn.
I think this is one of Haydn's stateliest symphonies.
Little foreshadowing of Beethoven at the very end there 😅
Civilization 5: Brave new world
Why are all these in the wrong keys? Like up half a key
The interpretation by The Orchestra of the 18th Century, conducted by Frans Brüggen. They play on original or copies of original instruments. Timebased instruments, one could say. The orchestra has the habit of doing a lot of research in history of music. Hence Orchestra of 18th century.
Actually, they are about a semitone LOWER than TODAY'S STANDARD.
Your expectation, that there was a standard pitch in Haydn's time, and it was identical with today's standard is wrong.
In Haydn's time there was no uniform standard. In Haydn's time almost surely this symphony was NEVER played at a'=440 Hz.
who is painting ?
Albert Christoph Dies
@@ryzesonmaravich4945 ,¡muchas gracias!
@@ryzesonmaravich4945 спасибо!
I don't understand why this isn't nicknamed "The Fart Symphony".
Did they use some "funky" tuning for this cuz it sounds a little out of tune to me?
They are using baroque tuning, about A=415. It is about one half-step flat of the modern A=440 standard. A=415 was more or less the standard in Haydn's time.
@@willduan4869 It is "odd" that in a tuning system, you can pick any arbitrary tuning frequency and then simply adjust the other adjacent notes to be equidistant from each other (percentagewise such as 5.9% spaced in pitch), based on that reference point. For example, A4 can be 440 Hz but it can also be 415, 432, 444, or basically ANY reasonable frequency. Personally, I think music should be based on A as the start of the octave, not C. I don't see the logic in using C as the crossover points from 1 octave to the next. I would have started with A0 = close to 14 Hz and build from there, then the longest pipe on a pipe organ would be about 37 feet (about 11.2m) instead of about 32 feet (about 9.7m). It would be awesome to hear that low A rumble a church, perhaps stacked with an A1 = 27.5 Hz. However, being an exact multiple of the "bad" 7 Hz frequency which is supposed to be bad for our bodies, perhaps 14 Hz should be used sparingly like at the end of the mass, that way if people start dropping like flies, the people that survived can exit the church and make room for the emergency people to come in with body bags.
@@willduan4869 The D natural that they play is not quite the same as a modern C#/Db so it is not a half step off. I am wondering if they are using A = 432 Hz tuning system.
Sinfonie 93!!!!
-Bulbo
prrrrrrrrt
Pour les 4 e 11:55
3rd mvmt
yes one of the best menuets.
6:30 Figure F SYO excerpt 2018
12:58 yw
13:06 😂😂
White beans symphony