JFK assassination: Father, son probe single-bullet theory
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 лис 2013
- Forensic scientists Michael Haag and Luke Haag have re-examined the idea that one bullet hit both President Kennedy and Texas Gov. John Connally. They join the "CBS This Morning" co-hosts to explain the research that went into "Cold Case JFK," a documentary featured in the PBS series "NOVA."
JFK was actually hit by 2 bullets not 1
The third one to the head was from the front.
Did you ever think about the fact that the bullet might have ricoched off of something and hit him in the head?
Vilbacon Valcea: That is not a fact. The fact is that there is no evidence for such a thing. Did you have something in particular in mind, by the way?
Realbillball He was in the sewer(seen in ALL videos, including this CGI) and had a "can't miss" point blank shot from the curb sewer opening, which was only slightly ahead of the limo on the President's side of car. This shooter was the "fail safe" shooter, and was only to fire if the job wasn't done successfully already.
Not a single bullet. Ive watched videos over and over. He gets shot in the neck first and then after he went to grab his neck, boom the right side of his head blows open. Theres no way one bullet can do that. Not to mention that the first bullet also struck the front passenger. It slows the bullet down
1:11 I thought JFK was just chillin behind them 😂
BRUH LOL
Same
Bruh
Same
“Yo what’s up I’m alive btw”
A time traveler went back in time to 1963. When he arrived he saw a member of the CIA. Just to make sure he arrived in the right year he asked the CIA agent "Excuse me sir, what year is this?" The agent said, "1963". The time traveler then asked him, "Before or after the Kennedy assassination?" The CIA agent said, "Before."
Read the Steven King book, "11/22/63". The book does this exact same senerio. They actually stop the assassination. The moral of the story in this book, "Be careful what you wish for."
You are just being silly.
Terrible joke. grooooan.
@@peterfraser9070comedy is subjective
@@AlfredoReyes-eb5tb Comedy is not pretty - Steve Martin
It's hard to believe that this is such a simple case and that any alternative to the current narrative is bunk when even to this day documents surrounding this are still considered top secret and will not be released. Someone or something is implicated by those documents and it scares officials in the know on this subject to even consider releasing them.
my teacher showed us in the assasination vid if you watch the driver closely he reaches back and point and him right before the 2nd shot
The driver shot him it’s on film clearly. Over the shoulder bam 💥
@@jimmyjewtron2845 exactly
@brob-zy8zi While you were napping, the ARRB already examined the "unreleased files" (of which there's not many left), and reported there was nothing to suggest much less prove, a conspiracy.The "hidden" files are the last gasp by conspiracy kooks that have nothing left. They have no evidence of a conspiracy and no clue who or what else to blame.
James Files who was the actual shooter will be back at the Grassy Knoll this fall in 2023:
ua-cam.com/video/BXv9GJFLsr0/v-deo.htmlsi=NVvXu_y4A50J0-C9
The world would be so much different if they didn’t use a convertible
I doubt it.
So heres the thing, jfk whether that day or in the future was going to be assasinated. He got involved with the wrong people and made the wrong enemies, especially his relationship to the cia. Doubt the world would be radically different, but you never know.
*tink!*
Kennedy: "What was that? Why is everyone running? Why's the driver freaking out?
Everyone who watched the UA s2 knows that he would have started a nuclear war that would wipe us out😂
why didn’t he go in something like a bullet proof jeep or something? more over that, why didn’t the secret service do anything after they heard the very first shot? they left him vulnerable and wide open for an easy shot
*shoots a bar of soap* “WOW! What did you learn?”
...
+Zerynity That jet fuel doesn't melt bars of soap.
C'mon! it was Nuetrzina special 6.5mm accepting soap bro .
That your career will be significantly improved when you use pseudoscience to moronically explain the "crazy bullet theory" that is scoffed since the FBI report of Dec 1963 that was put in to the Warren commission!
@Warren Peace Yep, two days ago I got a stroke and I was finally convinced by the Warren Committee, so thank you mr. Warren for your excellent job!
Oswald was definitely on steroids, firing 4 shuts in 5,4', all by himself from back and to the right of the president's car and that's why JFK jolted back and to the left with parts of his brain splattering on the back of the car...
Please bring some more "scientists" to make soap tests to explain these facts too, I cannot wait for some more laughs! LOL
Lol gotta love fake news
It's amazing how Oswald improved with each shot. First he completely misses the car. Then he gets JFK in the back. Then he gets him in the head. All while the car is moving farther away from his position. What a marksman....
3rd shot looks like a shotgun blast tho.
When he fired the first shot, the car was moving basically perpendicular to the shot; it was moving from left to right as Oswald was looking at it. That's not an easy shot, especially when he was most likely very nervous before taking that shot. When he took the second shot, the car was almost moving directly away from him; the target wasn't moving much on any axis. Easier shot. Same for the third shot. So the shots became easier.
Back and to the left
First shot was deflected by the tree or street sign arm. That's why James Teague was hit with an off-angle fragment.
@@zachary5101 I used to think the same thing. But watch the stabilized Zapruder film. JFK actually moves forward slightly on the third shot before moving backward. The backward movement was muscle movement. Before I read Gerald Posner's book I was prepared to slam it like I'd done to so many other "Oswald did it" books. This one convinced me I had been wrong about the JFK assassination for over 40 years.
We all knew it was a cover up from day one .
" we all knew " - reeeeeallly definitive
It's remarkable that they're still keeping it up.
❤
Correct, except the cover up is wholly justified and the American people are far better off being left in the dark.
@@nancycombsify yeah, too bad there's all these scientific, fact-based, repeatable ballistic tests that keep getting in the way of them (keeping it going)..
I came here after inexplicably being recommended the Minecraft recreation of the assassination and now I'm on a JFK roll
JakeyBoy me too
Lol same
Lmao same
Same
same here
" latest technology " means knowing how to make animations with Gmod and source movie maker apperntly. I guess I'm a professional forensic scientist now.
Also using Black Ops models
the thing with computerized modelling....garbage in means garbage out
@Goose Tater HaHa LoL, lOoK i'M gOnNa ShAmE oN hIm JuSt BeCaUsE oF a MiStAkE
@Goose Tater not a native speaker so my English is alright given the context. Odd thing to point out.
@Goose Tater you deleted your comment
For people who were not alive when this happened..I can tell you it shocked everyone..the second shock was the Zapruder films..I remember life magazine had frame by frame color pictures..
The public was kept from seeing the film play for 12 years. Thank God for Mr. Groded who showed it on an early Haraldo show.
I can't believe they released the Zapruder film 12 years after the assassination.
unfortunately the Zapruder film we see today isn't the orginal, the CIA got hold of the film shortly after the shooting and altered it, removing frames of the head wound and when the limo slowed to a stop.
The person who did it was sitting in the far back and to the left of the limo... back and to the left.. Back and to the left!
Now, Who is sitting in the backseat to the left of Johnny? I'll give you three guesses but you're only going to need one!🏌🏿♂️The person who did it was sitting in the far back and to the left of the limo! I repeat: Back and to the left...Back and to the left!
Now, Who was sitting in the 'back' to the 'left' of Johnny? I'll give you three guesses but you're only going to need one!🏌🏿♂️
@@thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303 There is NO WAY Jackie killed him. That is the absolutely most absurd theory of all time.
The doctors at Parkland said the throat wound was absolutely an entrance wound. The back wound was documented to be at T3, too low to hit Connelly if it exited out the throat, which it didn't. And they refused to trace the path from the back wound through the body. Connelly himself said the shot that first hit Kennedy was NOT the one that hit him. Who are you going to believe? The one who were actually there? Or those making guesses?
The doctors at Parkland did not speculate on whether wounds were enterance or exit. They knew instantly that JFK had fatal wounds and simply did what they could to alleviate pain. They did not examine the body, which was covered in blood obscuring detail, thoroughly at all. In fact, they had no idea that he had a wound in his back, they never turned him over.
Not true. Dr Perry has always testified it was an exit wound. Privatly maybe a differant story
Connolly did not know whether or not the first shot fired struck Kennedy. He heard the rifle shot and turned to look behind him, but did not see him. He said this over and over. As Connolly was turning to his right to see if he could find Kennedy that way, that was when he was struck by the second shot. That bullet struck both men. Connolly never was certain that the first shot struck Kennedy and he never avowed that it did. His testimony on this never changed, and there are several vids of him speaking about it on UA-cam.
Only one problem with that is the bullet that entered Connolly's back keyholed. That means sideways. It had to have hit something first.@@rossie714
the doctors at Parkland did not know there was a back wound. It makes the theory of the front neck wound flimsy without counting for the back wound at the time. Also, the back wound was never found to have an exit -- meaning it had to either be in the body or it had to exit the neck.
It seems to me the neck wound is from the back with the head wound possibly from the side/front
The last shot forced his head to the back and to the left, this means that a force(bullet) was acting on him from the front and right. When bullets hit someone, the exit wound is always larger than the entrance due to the shock wave show in the later scenes in this news video with the ballistic gel expanding violently. The last shot has been described as blowing the back of his head out, evidence that the exit of the bullet was the back of his head which means the shot was taken in front of him. It sucks that we have to go over this all the time online but the one and only government investigate was rushed and not thorough. Also the evidence to this day is still classified under national security for some reason.
Yes , unfortunately!
Because it was the government
Shhhh. Common sense and logic isn't allowed here.
@@anthonydyson1654 -Yes it's the conspiracy theorists with common sense,logic and the truth. Lone Nutters are just disruption agents...
He got hit from the back. The movement 'back and to the left' happened because his head had nowhere else to go after the initial impact of the bullet. His head moved forward at first , then recoiled back and to the left. His chin probably hit the top of his chest before recoiling. This happened in a microsecond.
Now talk about the one that blew open his head.
That shot can be clearly seen coming from behind on the Zapruder film.
That only happened in that Kevin Costner movie.
JFK The film that exploded the stupid idiotic theory of one man with a Magic Rifle firing Magic Bullets etc.. killing our President.
@@vernpascal1531 JFK the movie has fallen off the Cliff of relevance. The Original Zapruder film that proves a Single shot struck JFK and Connolly still Wins the Day.
They did. Watch the entire episode, not shown here. It was aired on PBS. You can pay UA-cam & watch the entire episode. It was excellent & I am totally convinced that Oswald was the lone gunnan. All the other conspiracy garbage you hear is just that, garbage. You can't argue with physical evidence.
They wouldn't let anyone on a mainstream media broadcast who was going to seriously question the government's narrative
You can throw all the analysis of the single bullet theory right out the window for a very simple reason that is always overlooked, and that is: We can see from autopsy photos that the bullet that struck Kennedy from behind did not strike him anywhere near the back of his neck. The photos show that the bullet hole in Kennedy's back is about a third of the way down from the base of his neck and the bullet hole in his shirt also corresponds with this location. I think it was Gerald Ford, but I could be wrong, who just changed the autopsy information saying the bullet struck Kennedy much higher, and no one questions this. He actually just moved the bullet hole higher up. The conspirators changed the location of Kennedy's back wound so they could prove their single bullet theory. It is such a blatant manipulation of evidence. All the nurses and doctors at Parkland Hospital who first saw the wound in the front of Kennedy's neck, in his throat area, before the tracheotomy was done, said that it was a very small hole consistent with an entry wound. Now we are in Dallas, not podunk Alabama, these professionals saw gunshot wounds all the time and knew the difference between an entrance wound from an exit wound.
You are absolutely correct- this video is a joke. how much longer must we put up with all this crap.
Try and keep up.
Podunk Alabama, huh? Apparently you’re not aware of UAB hospital where the first heart transplant in Alabama was performed, or countless other major shooting trauma operations have been performed.
EXACTLY. It's not even cose. So when people purposely overlook this it's very dissapointing..even more dissapointing if they simply didn't look at the autopsy photos to be certain.
This is false. You are referencing the poorly referenced dot made on the face-sheet diagram, which was later corrected by the pathologist who drew it. It’s the painstaking measurements and precise anatomical location that matters, not an approximated dot on comic-book diagram. The back wound was above the scapula (shoulder blade) and was measured with great precision. You will look up the precise locations and will know what’s true, but you will refuse to acknowledge it. It’s how the conspiracy-minded brain works.
They imitate muscle tissue, what about bones, ligaments, organs.
the where talking about the neck of JFK because that's where he was shot the 1st time but ik what you mean because the other was also shot
Unfortunately this is what happens when you go up against the federal bank,look up executive order 11110
@@bemotivated8443 ...and when you want to dissolute the CIA and put it under direct presidential control. When you want to withdraw troops from a small Asian country when millions of tons of military equipment is waiting nearby from the unfought end of the 2nd World War. When you want to put and end a billion dollar Casino and drug related mob and government business. When you just want Cuba be.
in what bones and organs did Kennedy get shot?
@@ignatziusturret5641 These 2 government puppets are spreading untruth. If one takes some time and looks at all the _real_ evidence--and there are mountains of it--there is *_no way_* that Oswald acted alone.....if he even acted at all.
Very Best Regards,
Tom Scott
Author ● Speaker ● World's Leading Expert on the Corrupt U.S. Legal System
_Our American Injustice System_
_Stack the Legal Odds in Your Favor_
Everybody laughing but he got killed trying to help us, noone has tried ever since.
Tried to help the people
Donald Trump tried and the swamp is tightening their grip.
@@valdavis4474 dude you're about to start a war
He was just a person trying to expose the false idealism the government was in. It was ruining our society . . He was tired of being the face of deception.
What was he exposing and help us with what?
“…and when we return, a father and son prove 2 + 2 = 17….”
Lol
I love the last part he says sums it all about the case.
so you dont have to be a good shooter to hit a moving target.......yea sure
The average American believes that Oswald never handled a rifle before the day he assassinated JFK. Oswald actually practiced with the Carcano rifle before he assassinated JFK.
@@radar0412 -Hey unless you are blind and disregard physics, which you must if you swallow the official garbage, the head shot came from The Grassy Knoll....
@@vernpascal1531 The shot to the back of JFK'S head came from the back. It can be clearly seen on the Zapruder film. There's even an autopsy photograph of the entry wound to the back of JFK'S head. Somehow I have a feeling the garbage you've swallowed is enough to fill The Lincoln Tunnel.
You just need to know how the works and understand bulletspeed to predict a shot that will hit
@TermsofService He barely qualified with a rifle. Horrible shooter.
I’d like to know, where was Carole Baskin on that day..?
Martin McDonald 😂😂😂😂😂
Martin McDonald begins the gun silly
She was busy feeding the tigers. Do we know what she fed them? Her husband...
Yooo
Morgan Marsh dont know for sure
Dale Myers gave a very good explanation for the single bullet.
Isn't it true that the shot that did JFK's head the most damage propelled him backwards (meaning it was fired from the front)?
Literally In Mary Moorman's photo.
As In, You can See Him.
Right There In The Window
4.bp.blogspot.com/-L83z3F_FExo/T9O4z82JSfI/AAAAAAAABpM/utf4KJ0h5zU/s2500/Mary-Moorman-Photo.jpg
No.
Yes! It thew his head back and to the left blowing the back of his skull off. The doctors at parkland ER said the back of his skull was blown off as well.
Magic bullet:
Yes a bullet can go into yaw after the first hit but at that velocity, there's no way it had enough time to make such radical changes in direction. They also totally discount the witnesses on the ground and on the bridge who heard the shot from the grassy knoll and saw the smoke. They also said it was a different sound.
The fatal shot came from the gutter as he rode by..and cia and mob joined forces to take jfk out.
@@markherring3513 You forgot Castro, and his supporters and opponents, the Soviets .... oh, and Uncle Tom Cobbly and all.
I'm never becoming a president after all this.
Pfft if youre scared of that then please, never become president, we need bravery and leadership
+
adrixlly Sure you can! All you gotta do is pledge your support for all the secret societies.
Too bad, I would voted for you. Have a good day.
adrixlly 😂😂💪🏽
adrixlly Too bad you seemed like the one to have made a better president than that comic with orange face with the fluffy hair.
*"FaThEr AnD sOn UsEd ThE lAtEsT TeChNoLoGie"*
Call of duty black ops devs: a.m. I a joke to you
@Goose Tater r/ihaveastroke
The convenience of this is overwhelming.
It’s undisputed that one shot struck a curb and struck Mr. Tague in the cheek. Another shot striking Kennedy’s head was frangible or explosive and inconsistent with military Full Metal Jacket ammo that Oswald allegedly used. The magic bullet, CE #399, that caused seven wounds in Kennedy and Connolly wound up in pristine condition on a baby stretcher in Parkland Hospital. Gerald Ford altered the location of Kennedy’s back wound upward to reconcile the bullet wounds with the official government story. This single fact debunks your experts' thesis.
Interestingly, none of the four agents who handled the bullet in the chain of custody would identify 399 as the bullet they saw in evidence. Looking at the medical forensic records, Commission Exhibit 392, a magic fourth bullet, entered Connolly’s thigh, was never removed, and lies buried with the governor. All the evidence was manipulated, none reliable, and this video is horse dung.
they are still LYING about THIS.
Donnell Vickers enlighten us then
@@hop4784 they still saying that there was One SHOOTER' impossible look at the film his head went VIOLENTLY TO THE LEFT AND BACK, it was clearly a frontal head shot.
@Donnell Vickers
One shooter two bullets.
@@Lolpy. i still think that is was more then one shooter, cause his head popped open from the front to the back, if he got shot from the back his head would have went forward
@@donnellvickers6314 exactly and don't let any debunker shill tell you otherwise...
Do these guys work for the CIA?
They work for the illuminati you see the eye
Probably!
Loyal Ronin I
No they are the killers!
Nope. They just have a lot of common sense and proof.
Just like 3 tall buildings, collapsing to the ground by 2 airplanes and not one single explosive.
For a second there, I thought it was the COD Black Ops game.
They probably used the same model.
Rename this video “An Idiot and His Son”
@Random Account
Yeah
Few can put all of the evidence in play. Can you?
@Laika24102007 According to official US documents all of the evidence is gone? Read the WCR.
Connolly himself knew he was hit by a separate shot and that there was no magic bullet drivel and even said so. 2 separate shots.
Right. So if you don't listen to The Connally's, or both Dr. Gregory, and Dr. Shaw who treated Connally, and the 2 Autopsy Assistants and the 2 Federal Agents who didn't believe the SBT...Oh Brother! IOW-Just don't listen to those who were there and make up a hail mary story and with authority can sell it to the media .
And two separate shots means two shooters: conspiracy.
@@brianlecloux6508 But there was just one shooter. It is a absolute FACT someone fired a rifle owned by Oswald 3 times from the 6th floor at 12:30 pm Dallas time. The media boys only heard three shots as did many others so there isn't a second shooter period.
@@boblackey1 Incorrect. There were five shots. That is rock solid evidence from the acoustics analysis done by BBN and validated by Weiss and Ashkenasy. The shot from the Knoll killed JFK as seen on the Z film. There were two head wounds on the President, one low from the back, causing subcortical damage as shown in the official photos and x rays, the other from the right front causing cortical damage, as shown on the official photos and x rays. These wounds are discontinuous caused by separate bullets of different ammunition. There is NO evidence that rifle was fired on 11/22/1963. The Warren Report was a WHITEWASH.
Connelly was mistaken. But Connelly wasn't mistaken about ALL the shots coming from the rear over his right shoulder. Connelly wasn't mistaken when he said when the President was shot from behind that blood and body tissue sprayed all over the jump seat and he and his wife WHO WERE SEATED IN FRONT ON THE PRESIDENT. Connelly was also right when he said this idea that Earl Warren, Richard Russell, Gerald Ford and the other members of the Warren Commission were part of some conspiracy, Connelly said he would accept at all and it's completely ridiculous...that he knew all those men very well and they would never be involved with such a thing.
So many people in teh CIA wanted to have him gone. It is seriously amazing how the cover up happened so quickly. I wonder what secrets died with Allen Dulles.
James Files’ rendition seems the most plausible explanation I’ve heard.
Well done CBS, in promoting the "official" line.
Bullsh$t, but the “ official” line.
The bullet that went through two men barely deformed. It was a full metal jacket. The headshot was a frangible bullet. It was not fired from the same gun or angle.
Complete nonsense at all levels; for one the second bullet is flattened-visibly misshapen, if you examine it front on.
One bullet is plausible if it hits Kennedy without striking bone. It has now been slowed enough to not fragment. It passes though Connelly sideways (he did have an oval entrance wound). It strikes bone at his wrist sideways which shatters that. Still too slow to fragment the bullet.
The bullet they found was deformed sideways btw.
Bingo! Ballistics science is pure evidence, period. The two bullets which hit JFK were totally dissimilar because they were fired from two different rifles. Forensics 101 - frangible bullets break apart, full metal jacket rounds stay intact.
@@user6008 learn that you can have two type of bullets (HP,and FMJ) within the same mag. Alternating the types for a reason
@@THEAMERICAN-ob2wt Sure you can have two types of rounds in the weapon but not two sizes. A round going through bone causes a slightly larger hole than the round fired. The 6mm hole in the back of Kennedys skull would not allow a 6.5mm Carcano round to pass. Now on the other hand.... a 5.56mm round could.
Many witnesses also said they heard gunshots in the bushes in front of them. that is never mentioned.
Imagine the level of dexterity and marksmanship required for one person to fire three accurate shots on a moving target from a 20 year old single shot bolt action rifle. See eye eh?
Hahaha! Nothing bad ever happens to the Kennedy’s!!! WOAH!!!
*Gun shot*
I Am Kennedy, I Am Not Accustomed To Tragedy! **Cries**
Clone high........f-funny
Gun shot and losing their new born son.
You beat me to it
There was more than one person involved in this
You got that right and a helluva lot more than one.
Vern Pascal duh
You are the other!!
Check history, lady bird would do Anything to get lbj in the White House ANYTHING!!
Go watch it again. You clearly see the driver finish the job
0:20 In the first report it read that the bullet entry was in the upper back near or in the shoulder blade. It was later when they changed the entry hole to the beck area.
There were (At least) 3 shots, the first hit kennedy in the neck,from behind. Connally heard this and turned to his left, there were then 2 shots almost on top of each other, one hit Connelly and the other hit Kennedy . (From Connally's own recorded testimony in hospital). It is completely impossible for a Manlicher Carcano bolt action rifle (Allegedly used by Oswald) to do this. Therefor, there was a second shooter, and a conspiracy... The rest was covered up by the Warren commission...
Wrong. The first shot missed, the second hit Kennedy in the neck, passed through him, and then hit Connally in the back and wrist. The third shot was the fatal one. It is possible, it's been re-recreated, get a job or a better hobby.
@@c.j.giordano2129 If you'd bothered to read the autopsy, the wound was 5.5 inches below his mastoid process, which is the bony part of the ear; And 5.5 inches from the tip of the right acromion process, which is the pointed part of the shoulderblade. So at the base of the right side of his neck.
It grazed the right side of his C6, came out his throat, and continued on a roughly downward angle, hitting John Connally in the back and continued onwards before striking his right wrist.
And the shot did not come from the front. There was a small entry wound in the back right of his head right on the part of his hair, and the force of the shot carved a trench in his head and blew out skull fragments from the back to the front right.
A bullet coming out to the front and right would force your head in the opposite direction. So...back and to the left.
Back
And to the left.
I’ve shot a lot of guns and have never seen a bullet go through something and come out pristine. I don’t think it could have gone through two people and not have major damage
@@gregirwin6046 Who said it was? The bullet started to tumble before hitting John Connally and hit him at an odd angle, almost lengthwise.
@@c.j.giordano2129 I don't know how to argue with someone who doesn't understand basic human anatomy.
The C in C6 stands for "cervical", as in your cervical vertebrae. The bones IN YOUR NECK.
And the C6 isn't even the lowest! It counts down from the top, 1 to 8. Your C6 is in the base of your neck.
The bullet grazed just to the right of it, passing through his neckstrap muscles.
He wasn't sitting straight up and down when he was hit, he was leaning slightly forward, which gave the bullet the trajectory to pass out of the front, tumble through Connally's torso, rebound off one of his ribs, smash his wrist, and stop in his leg.
Amazing just how many people believe what they are told
I believe you!
@ray h. I do
@@gonogazz you shouldn't
Yes 1+1 = 5.
Ignorant
These guys are leaving a LOT of what happened out of their simulation. There were test shots fired in many lab experiments over the years - by scientifically accredited labs (not some hacks) - and none of them came out pristine like that. Notice these guys did not include anything to simulate dense wrist bones in their field experiment. The government's theory also states that Oswald's first shot missed - and they had to because a bystander (James Tague) was hit in the cheek by a bullet fragment way up near the triple underpass. I'd like to see them add that to their simulation and run the entire scenario again. Additionally, this simulation, and the magic bullet theory in general, are not consistent with the findings of a forensic pathologist who examined the Kennedy evidence dating back to 1972. I could go on and on. But there will always be servile sycophants of government, like these guys, who's idea of American patriotism is believing everything the government says and will go out of their way to quelsh any criticism of government regardless of how unbelievable government's story is.
They even forgot the simplest thing ever: the gun wasn't pointed straight out.
the "magic bullet" has slowed down considerably once it hits Connolly's wrist, so it isn't going to act like a direct hit at that point.
John Connally still had bullet fragments in his chest and wrist when he was buried; far more than what was missing from the magic bullet, not to mention bullet fragments found elsewhere. The magic bullet theory is BS.
@@chriswolney5002 lol that you could ever know the number/size/weight of the fragments that remained in Connolly chest or what was 'missing' from the bullett is really kind of laughable.
@@rrh1980Obviously you didn't read my entire post. You either lack critical thinking skills, or have an agenda. You don't need to know bullet fragment details to conclude that the 'official' narrative of what happened is highly suspect.
Random question and one for the experts on this investigation,
But has anyone ever reviewed the footage in infra red? would you not be able to pause frames in infra red and see the bullets? therefore confirming from which directions which shots were fired? or is the film qaulity too low to be able to perform that kind of analysis?
I’d like to see these two sit and chat with Rob Reiner, who has come out with his own research documentary. Both are very convincing.
Kennedy was hit by three rounds.( not in order ) 1: in the back from the "rear", 5 inches below the collar and to the right of the spine ( as documented at parkland by the truma personal ) 2: in the throat at the top of his tie from the "front" ( as documented at parkland by the truma personnel). 3: the right side of the head from the front ( as documented in the Z film ) and most likely by a frangible round. 1 from the rear and 2 from the front. Truma personal at parkland dealt with gunshot wounds on a regular basis at that time as I'm sure they do now and as a result are and were very qualified with regards to entry and exit wounds. Another round missed and struck the grass while yet another missed round struck a curb injuring a bystander near the overpass. Oswald could not have fired all those rounds from several different angles sumultianously or in 5 to 6 seconds. There were several shooters involved that day.
Agree with all you said Ken. Curious, where do you think the shooters were located?
You do know that a high powered rifle can go thru one person and go thru a second one, right?
“in the throat at the top of his tie from the "front" ( as documented at parkland by the truma personnel)”
Nonsense. Dr. Humes found bruises in the neck that couldn’t have been caused by the tracheotomy because the circulation of blood in the body was nearly nonexistent at that point. Without blood, there could be no bruise-that is, there could only be damage to tissue, not discoloration of the tissue. The bruising of the neck muscles and right lung had to have been caused while the president’s heart and lungs were still operating sufficiently to permit a bruise to occur. In short, these bruises, which lay along a path between the president’s back and his throat wound, could only have occurred prior to the incisions that were made at Parkland Hospital (i.e., they had to have been made at the time of the shooting), and hence, the damage found there had to have been the result of a bullet entering the president’s back and exiting the throat. Also, JFK’s shirt collar shows that the fibers were pushed OUTWARDS.
“the right side of the head from the front ( as documented in the Z film )”
The ZF shows the head moving FORWARDS as seen here: ua-cam.com/video/o0d6LG27hQM/v-deo.html
Enhanced frames show brain matter sprayed forward.
“most likely by a frangible round”
Nope. Dr. Charles Petty of the HSCA forensic pathology panel responded to Dr. Wecht’s frangible-bullet theory in his testimony before the committee. “I happen to be the coauthor of the only paper that has ever been written about the wounding capabilities of frangible bullets…[They are] used in shooting galleries…[and] are specifically designed to break up on the backdrop of the…gallery so as not to ricochet and cause injury to either the shooters or the people who work in the gallery…Such bullets and the breakup products of [these] bullets are easy to detect in X-rays. There are no such fragments in the X-ray of the late president’s head. There was no frangible bullet fired. I might also add that frangible bullets are produced in .22 caliber loads and they are not produced [for] larger weapons.” In fact, all eight of Dr. Wecht’s colleagues on the HSCA forensic pathology panel rejected his frangible-bullet hypothesis as well as any hypothesis concerning a bullet striking the president’s head in the area of the exit wound. “We believe strongly that another missile did not enter the right front of the head within the area of the large defect. We find no evidence supporting this speculation in the photographs of the head or brain, or in any of the X-rays of either adjacent bone fragments or the left side of the head where, in such an event, one might expect such a bullet to lodge. No other missile was found, and the majority [of the forensic panel excluding Dr. Wecht] knows of no bullet that would completely disintegrate on hitting the soft tissue of the brain, as Dr. Wecht suggests.”
Truma personal at parkland dealt with gunshot wounds on a regular basis at that time as I'm sure they do now and as a result are and were very qualified with regards to entry and exit wounds. “
They were focused on saving his life, not determining where the wounds came from. The very nature of an emergency trauma room at a hospital is such that forensically precise and accurate descriptions of the character of a gunshot wound cannot be expected. In fact, a 1993 article in JAMA reported that “the odds that a trauma specialist will correctly interpret certain fatal gunshot wounds are no better than the flip of a coin.” A study conducted by investigators at Bowman Gray School of Medicine at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, from 1987 to 1992, compared the post-mortem findings of a board-certified forensic pathologist with the medical records of emergency medicine physicians, trauma surgeons, and neurosurgeons. It was discovered that out of forty-six cases, trauma specialists made errors in 52 percent, either in differentiating the exit and entrance wound or in determining the number of bullets. In 15 percent of the cases, the trauma specialist made both types of error. As expected, multiple gunshot wounds (the situation with the president) were more often misinterpreted, accounting for 74 percent of the errors. Even single gunshot wounds were misclassified in 37 percent of the cases.
The problem I have is when you said the throat shot was from the front. If that shot came out the back of the neck, it would have been a pretty big and jagged hole. That hole was the size of a pencil. That was the shot he got behind the road sign. When he appears from behind the sign he's holding his throat. Your description of bullet #1 and bullet #2 are the same bullet. The third bullet was the head shot. The first shot deflected off the traffic light support hanging over the road. He never got hit in the throat from the front.
@@robertromero8692 Unfortunately the video you linked is from the government edit version, not original Z film. The 2 frames they look at actually don't show any movement of the head when you watch the spacing along Jackie's arm and the back of the seat with relation to JFK's head.
yeah, bc neutrogenia soap with a cloth on top is exactly like a brain filled skull.
That was the second and last bullet. They were talking about the first bullet that went through Kennedy's neck and struck the passenger in front.
Not sure how resistant that soap is but it wouldnt take much for a bullet to go through a human's neck.
@@BlackWolf-kr7wo I love how they examine one small aspect that maybe could have been theoretically possible- yet they don't address the fact that Fletcher Prouty, literally the chief of Special Operations for The Joint Chiefs of Staff when Kennedy was killed, has unequivocally stated that Kennedy was killed in a highly orchestrated fashion- and that it was immediately covered up at the highest levels.
And what would u know karen....
@@ethanchen2891 she knows more than a chump like you.
They were talking about the bullet that hit his neck
What about the direct shot to the front-right of JFK's head? That shot came from the front and not the rear where Oswald was.
IMO, it came from the gutter as JKF rode by.
To show he was hit in the head in the front to right first, he recoiled back, second his damage was on the front right side.
Anyone else bothered by the “bullet” they used, they showed the entire cartridge
I don't know what moment you are reffering to, but what they display on the table actually is the bullet itself. the whole cartridge is far larger and has a bottle neck. Also the 6.5mm Carcano bullet is round nosed like the one shown here. Apart from that, the whole report is pure MSM rubbish and doesn't explain anything. What they are telling makes as much sense as if they would say: when the trigger is pulled, this rifle goes BANG and a bullet flies out this end - and this prooves that the "single bullet" theory is correct.
@@JosipRadnik1 yes the bullet on the table is correct, I was referring to the brief animation
@@jonathankirchberger5526 I am answering a bit late, but the animation is also correct. The carcano slug was crimped into the casing creating that line. It is a very long slug and that line is clearly shown in photos of the slugs taken from the crime scene.
NOTHING BAD EVER HAPPENS TO THE KENNEDYS
*car crashes*
WAAA-
Gun shot and losing their baby son
*car explodes*
“ I’m a Kennedy! I’m not used to tragedies..”
Damn that thumbnail was Black Ops 1 JFK
I like how the bullet is flying with its shell and primer
Besides all the obvious and misleading manipulation, my favorite part is where JFK is already in his hurt position BEFORE being shot and hurt
I through i was the only one seeing that
For anyone who knows a little about JFK's assassination, watching this is just cringy.
William Crookshank
Yeah. This is hard to watch eh?
That bullet didn’t ricochet like that and then turn up looking g perfect..
Warren Peace
...
?
Yes it was. It was intact. INTACT!
My lord.
“No it wasn’t”
Input mate, well done. X
Warren Peace
It can be both. And it can also be one or the other. You see they are descriptive words :)
The bullet was perfectly intact.
:)
Unlucky mate.
@@creativeamerican8811 the bullet shatters when going inside a hard or even touching a hard surface for example the bones, muscles and skin.
:emojiwithfingerguns:
Yeah shatters..
So not intact
Warren deleted his comments I think..
Meh bored of it all now. No one wants to believe the truth anyway. That’s the key.
Does anyone else realize that the model they used looks exactly like jfk from black ops 1 😂
Senator Ralph Yarborough said he smelled the gunpowder as they drove past the grassy knoll, so there was a frontal shot
2:51 he was in a moving car buddy
but you do know that the driver slowed the car down after the first hit right?
The vehicle was moving slow. Then even slower after the first hit. Not hard to hit if you've ever shot a gun
@@brendenperry3770 From the angle and height he was shooting at, it’s a hard shot
"president, you cant say dallas doesnt love you"
"no you certianly cant"
gets shot
there were at least two shooters
and there were a whole lot of plotters in that
cold-blooded assassination
now that's what i believe
The one thing most people ignore is the fact that JFK was NOT in line with Connolly's seat. It was a jump seat that was inward 1 foot from Connolly's. The bullet didn't stop and turn 90 degrees like conspiracy theorists claim. It went thru JFK and straight into the back of Connelly's shoulder. Then, thru his wrist and ending up lodged in his thigh. No magic bullet.
The bullet was found intact on Connelly’s gurney. A bullet that hit 2 bones would be distorted.
Calling critical thinkers who should be questioning narratives, “conspiracy theorists”, completely discredits you and all of your posts. You are not looking for truth but to suit a narrative. People that are not critical thinkers such as yourself will most often be wrong and somebody’s fool.
How does this explain an exit wound on the back of the head?
It doesn't.
Doesn’t the Zapruder film show that he’s hit in the side of the head?
How do you know that? The whole right side of his skull was blown off. Just his scalp was left.
Even though I wasn't alive at the time that John f Kennedy was President I still believe that he was a very nice man and that his death was very unfortunate for many people and even for people who didn't even know who he was it was still so traumatizing to look at when he gets shot in the head
He was an adulterous drug addict with ties ties to the mafia.... its declassified do your homework. Yet I have to agree I woulda hung out with him . And not traumatic compared to a fatality "mortal combat" 🤣
@@Hateandlotus Yeah I heard he had a sultry affair with Marilyn Monroe, thus being an unfaithful husband.
He also wasted a lot of American money during the Cold War and was very uneducated, especially due to his age/experience. He was a “yes” man-very easy to convince.
Ahhh I love when first graders do their first president reports. It so cute
Nobody even mentions the most obvious thing that nullifies this whole program. They have the bullet entrance in the base of the neck. The entrance was 6 inches below the base of the neck! FBI Report,Dr. Boswell Autopsy Face Sheet etc.
He literally said there’s an unaccountable bullet/shot and then exclaimed he doubts there was two shooters. “Back....and to the left”
the unaccountable shot was the first one, that was assumed to have missed. the zapruder film basically confirms this.
Multiple witnesses said they heard at least six shots. Can you confirm?
There was a report of a bullet hitting the curb and a piece of the concrete flew up and cut a guy's face. That was reported the week after JFK died. I haven't heard anything about this since.
"Back....and to the left" was a quote from the movie JFK. It's a movie, not a documentary. Doesn't mean it's true. You need to talk with a qualified ballistics expert.
@@thelakeman5207 look at the footage mate. It’s clearly visible.
Bravo Sierra!
They mentioned a shot that was not accounted for, which one?
Oswald’s missed his first shot, that bullet was never found. He hit JFK with the next 2 shots.
@@thomasgalvin4069 no he did not
I like how he had his son explained 3D technology. 😂
and the bullet comes out perfect on the other end without any damage. Thats BS
Purefoldnz thats how it works
Purefoldnz No ..it was a glancing shot..from the side ..opesite from grassy nole
It didn't come out in perfect condition, it was compressed from the side after entering Connolly in yaw. Watch "Cold Case JFK." It will clear up a lot of the confusion.
I listen to the Haags, not conspiracy theorists. I find them to be highly credible. As Luke, the father, says, the Kennedy assassination is the classic shooting reconstruction case. The bullets Oswald used were extremely rare, military style bullets from the first World War. They are highly stable, with a blunt, cylindrical tip. If the Haags thought something was out of the ordinary they would have said so. The bullet wasn't pristine, it was flattened, from contacting Connolly in yaw. It entered Connolly in yaw because it had already passed through something/someone (Kennedy). There was bullet wipe on Kennedy's jacket (a circular initial entry wound), but none on Connolly's (a rectangular entry wound from a bullet in yaw---again, it had already passed through something). It's all pretty logical, and more importantly, it's scientifically repeatable, as the Haags have demonstrated. The idea that the trajectories don't work out (passing through Kennedy then into Connolly) has also been disproved. Kennedy's skull fractures all radiate forward, which contradicts the grassy knoll, frontal shot theories. Kennedy's forward movement after being shot from the rear is also scientifically explainable, but it doesn't "seem" to make sense so people don't dig further.
1. Nobody in Dealey Plaza thought they were hit by the same bullet! 2. The EOP wound vanished from the official record in 1966,though it was seen by at least 8 witnesses,including the 3 Doctors and Dr. Finck said ,and I believe Humes too for the HSCA that photos were taken of this wound and they also vanished 3. Roughly 90% of the Autopsy Photos have disappeared or were destroyed-we have the testimony of WH Photographers Knudsen& O'Donnell which in tandem destroy the official story. So, the real kooks are the insulting arrogant windbags who argue the official BS!
is that the COD Black Ops 1 JFK model?
The clip you showed an exit wound is larger than the entry.
Well, Oswald didn't shoot himself. He was murdered while handcuffed. Thus, there is more to the story than has been told.
MK ULTRA
Tony Yu ya, and a piece of the back of Kennedy’s head got blown off, which means a second shot came from the front...
@Birken Schimpff
No
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_autopsy#/media/File%3AHSCA-JFK-head-7-125.jpg
@@Birkbirk1 how many people have you seen shot in the head?
@@Lolpy. if you believe in that diagram then you have less brains in your head than JFK ended up with!
28 doctors at Parkland Hospital witnessed seeing a 4 inch hole in the lower back right portion on his head. They can't all of imagined it!
Please do some revision and open your mind, no pun intended.
0:20 Everything is possible when you can shoot a bullet with casing intact
I thought the same thing, but then I realized that this is just how the bullet head looks. See 1:37
Finally. He*ck youtube algorithm, seriously
There were also 41 bullet fragments in Connally’s body
Aaaand, my comment is deleted again.
WRONG lol take a better look and edit this comment.
Ruth the black ops 1 thumbnail has me dyin
Haag said there’s one shot that unaccounted for. Interesting how there’s no follow up question to that statement.
The bullet was found in perfect shape. Impossible.
They certainly did not explain that = = Because they couldn’t !
Oswald supposedly shot at General Walker weeks earlier and Missed. His First shot at Kennedy = = A Miss ( presumably the most likely to be a hit for aiming etc ) ~ ~ And then Two Bang On Shots with the second one looking most likely to have come from the front = = Oswald sure improved a lot from the first two shots ( that we know about ) = = He sure improved on the job = = The assassination went all too well ( from the Killer / killers point of view ) and everthing went so well from that point of view = = It is really plausible that Oswald did this = = The Loser who couldn’t get anything right = = suddenly did .Exact right place right time ~ Two very good shots ( with one looking like it came from the front )
It’s a stretch to believe all of this ! ! ~ A Big Stretch.
It wasn't in "perfect" shape. It was compressed so that the circular shape of the bullet became oval after contacting Connolly in yaw.
@@williamtaylor5193 Contacting Connolly in yaw? What are you talking about? Do you ever read WC testimony?
@@81overon The hole in Connolly's jacket was rectangular, unlike Kennedy's initial entry wound, which was circular. It's not a difficult concept.
@@williamtaylor5193 Dr Shaw didn't operate on Gov Connally's jacket. I've been studying this case since the late 60s. You have to come up with something better than a hole in a jacket. Pure nonsense.
Governor Connelly maintained from the first that he heard the first shot, and was familiar with firearms . He also maintained he was not hit by that bullet that hit Kennedy. The film shows it with his reaction seconds later.
Conelly knew that you don't hear the shot that hits you, due to his wartime experience, he also heard the first shot, so he knew it didn't hit him. He didn't hear the second shot, which penetrated both men.
@@theincorruptedeye8226 amen
@@theincorruptedeye8226 Bingo. 1st round missed, 2nd hit JFK and Connelly and the 3rd exploded JFK's skull.
First shot missed everyone. Second shot hit Kennedy in the neck and Connally in the back. Third shot, well you've seen what that did.
@@thelakeman5207 explains to me why the reaction is off in the video.
I would like to see your reenactment of this, as u say not a hard shot. Range, and moving target. Let’s see it
Felt like a job interview. I'm stressed out. 😬
The Magic Bullet theory is the most absurd explanation for the ballistics in this instance. It actually defies the laws of Physics. Additionally the Doctor that looked at the president in the hospital claimed the neck shot in the front was an entrance hole. The bullet hole in the neck was enlarged by the surgeon to try to establish a breathing track.
“Additionally the Doctor that looked at the president in the hospital claimed the neck shot in the front was an entrance hole.”
There were several doctors at Parkland hospital. Here’s what some of them had to say:
Dr. Marion Jenkins: “I thought this was a wound of exit because it was not a clean wound, and by ‘clean,’ [I mean] clearly demarcated, round.”
Dr. Charles Baxter: “We…did not determine at that time whether this represented an entry or an exit wound. Judging from the caliber of the rifle that [was] later found…this would more resemble a wound of entry. However…depending upon what a bullet of such caliber would pass through, the tissues it would pass through on the way to the [throat], I think that the wound could well represent either an exit or entry wound.”
The Parkland doctors were confused because they never turned JFK over. They never saw the entrance wound on his upper back.
Fibers in the front of the shirt collar were pushed OUTWARDS, indicating an exit wound in front.
"It actually defies the laws of Physics. "
Wrong. It fits very well with the laws of physics.
What if the gun that killed JFK was installed in the dashboard of the vehicle, aimed at Kennedy, and fired upwards, through JFK, toward the book depository, where the second gun was planted, and where lee Harvey Oswald was told to be by his co-workers, who were CIA operatives posing as employees?
CIA did this crime. CIA makes stories to cover up the truth. People have researched extensively and know who killed their president.
Through and throughs happen all the time. Just ask the director of Rust. in fact slowing and yawing of the bullet is the only explanation for the wounds on Connelly.
Governor Connally ALWAYS stuck to his testimony that he was hit by a SECOND bullet after he heard a shot and turned around and saw President Kennedy holding his throat. This is completely verified by watching the Z-film.
who would've thought something so simple could change history...
The computer illustration re enactment doesn't show Governor Conally holding his Stetsons gallon hat in his right hand, though.
Not a good shot? To catch him in motion at that angle from that distance?
Tbh the guys who shot JFK has some great accuracy.
He shot 3 times and 2 got hit, 1 in head and other in shoulder/neck
AVH Gaming what do you think about another shooter
I cant lie he does
Leroy he was in the military
I know I'm late for this but why he was such a great shot is because he was in the marines in 1956 where he earned a sharpshooter qualification
“The latest advancements in technology”
“We’re gonna shoot this soap”
That soap is equivalent to human tissue..so therefore it is the best example for testing.
What about the bullet hole in the windshield?
Repaired the next day in Michigan. The exact opposite of "preserving the crime scene".
They were using the black ops 1 model lmao
The fact that they used a 3d model of a bullet which is still in its shell, in the cg recreation, almost immediately discredits this.
It's not you gun specialist!
It certainly shows these ppl have no clue what they are doing.
What sort of a "science" could prove about the magic bullet without explaining how Conally was being wounded two and half seconds after Kennedy by the same projectile ?
Yes, there's so many things wrong with The Single Bullet Theory no honest person could accept it. 1. Both FBI Agents denied it in their initial report and 30 years later to the ARRB. 2. Both Autopsy Assistants in interviews said back wound never exited throat 3.Both Doctors who worked on Connally who had seen 100's of bullet wounds in Korea and WW2, did not believe it. There's a lot more but that should be enough not to believe it.
The driver killed him which is why they call it the magic bullet because it’s impossible
@Joel Le Bras: Put your brain-Bras on straight. The Z-film shows Connally and JFK reacting at the same instant to the bullet that passed through both of them. Your 2-1/2 seconds timing is pure "magic" nonsense.
@@apointofinterest8574 What an imagination ! Nobody can see such a thing in the Z-film and Conally always said he was hurt by a separate shot.
But you may be know that point better than Conally himself ? Notice I would'nt be surprised : in that case everything is possible even a supernatural intervention.
@@JoelLeBras Someone, in the heat of the moment (Connally) cannot always judge exactly what has happened. They're too close to the forest to see the trees. Subsequent calm and thorough investigations confirmed it was a single bullet that hit both men. Even the governor later publicly agreed with the WC's conclusions.
One thing I feel pretty certain of….the Warren Commission explanation is not what happened.
How far were they from their target when they too their test shot compared to the distance the shooter was when Kennedy was shot?
Funny how both men could comfortably explain the physics of the single bullet that shot both men but didn't wanna apply the scientific method to the fatal shot which cleaved his head. Most people don't really care about the magic bullet, most people believe Oswald didn't act alone.
Connolly, in his autobiography, said the bullet fell out of his leg onto the operating room floor, where a nurse placed it into a bag.
Oswald acted alone, period. But what I won't explain is this fact - three bullets, two rifles, one shooter.....Oswald. Let it rest, Americans are better off not knowing the truth.
@@user6008 By Oswald, do you mean the high school drop out from the deep south that spoke fluent Russian? Maybe they all do, I don't know that many. I do know the simple fact that Oswald's scope was misaligned, When the army tested it they had to repair it first. And the rifle was either a Mauser or Carcano, depending on the day. I understand the doubt, there were only 92 witnesses that said the shots came from the "little hill."
@@ericbedenbaugh7085 There were two Oswalds. Different men.
@@Frip36 I've heard that theory. I'm not sure what to think about it.
2:30 "One shot that's unaccounted for"?
I assume he means the first shot fired, that missed, and struck the curb ahead of the limo, causing some concrete to fly up and hit James Tague in the face. But the “expert” says it’s unaccounted for.
wrong angle, wrong distance
Why does he look like jimmy from GTA V
Descanse em paz JFK !
Y tu como sabes paisita
Muy amable. Gracias
Total crap.
***** What Science exactly? Please don't say physics?!!? Come on tell me?
You believe Kennedy and Connolly were hit with the same bullet? You believe there was only one shooter? Not one expert marksman has ever replicated this then add to this the fact Oswald had a had not fired a rifle that day. The FBI has his parafin test which is clear.
No expert marksman has ever replicated the shooting with the same rifle.
***** So uh.....where's your evidence? I see you spouting off yet presenting nothing of substance. Oh that's right, nevermind....you can't. :-)
Halotest100 I don't know where you're getting your information, but it's been done many times. You need to expand your research. Stay away from the JFK movie, and people like Jesse Ventura.
Theory is he used the iron site and not the scope. This would have allowed him to acquire target even quicker on the 2nd and 3rd shot.
Why did such a 'stable' bullet fragment so badly on the head shot?