Great video You should make videos about the pheonix in Judaism, the shamir worm, and some giant creatures mentioned in the talmud. I wonder what mystical birds in Judaism there are
Saying Christianity misinterpreted Judaism is not a good way to word that. One could say the same of Islam to Christianity with the Muslim myth around the crucifixion of Christ. It's not a misinterpretaion as much as a seperate tradition from the same roots. Think Catholic vs Orthodox, Sunni vs Shia, Hasidic vs reform, etc
@@MythosSafari It really isn't though, yes one branched out from the other but it doesn't mean it's a misinterpretaion. Now of this is coming from a inherently Jewish perspective then yes it is but you seem to be presenting a much more secular scholarly style approach thus it's unfair to generalize a world religion (and the biggest one at that) as a misinterpretaion. Especially considering talking about the ideas of heaven and hell presented in the Christian New testament. The hell is still talked about extremely abstractly. The Gehenna which is mentioned is a trash pit near Jerusalem and Heaven is mentioned very rarely. There are better descriptions of heaven in the Hebrew Bible then the Christian New Testament with the prophets seeing God's throne and the angels around it. Most ideas in contemporary Christianity of Heaven and Hell are less scripturally based and more based on the stories of Dante and Milton. It also should be said that the New Testament deals in parable throughout so the idea of Leviathan being used could be allegory for the size of sin in the world. I enjoyed the video but it's little things like that which can be a distraction to an otherwise phenomenal piece of content. Also the beasts of Revelation are rich enough in their own right that a video on them individually could be wonderful especially in your style. Lumping them in as Leviathan when it's most likely a description to compare scale of the creature seems like a stretch and could limit content in the long run. Also calling it the Jewish Leviathan and then discussing it in Christianity and Islam limits the richness of all three traditions by linking them too intrinsically. Though they all share the patriarch of Abraham Islam has never claimed to be Christianity or Judaism and Christians have not claimed to be Jews since at least 150 CE when churches started being seperate then the home synagogues of the Jews in Diaspora from the Romans.
The thing is Islam didnt branchend of from christianity or judaism therfor to say that the depiction of Jesus in the quran could be seen as misinterpretation while its sources doesent come from judaism lr christianity is Hard but if Christians see things in the old tastemant different than classic judaism wich is defines well its understanding of the old hebrew bible this is what u would call a misinterpretation because many things doesnt even make sense if look at the anolgy of certain words and charackters to reinterpretat it in a way Christians do in a way their for most certanliy christianity has a pretty distorted understanding if the old hebrew bible most liköy because most Christians in many years of the beginning of christianity didnt had any understanding of hebrew and where used to trust not trust worthy Translation from all over the place
@@shenron8262the early Christians had the exact same Hebrew Bibles as the Jews of the time due to the fact that they saw themselves as Jews because in the Christian Tradition Jesus is the Jewish Messiah so if the Christian texts were mistranslations then so were the Jewish ones and thus both are misinterpreted. The Early Church fathers included St.Peter (The Rock upon which the church was built) and St.John (the beloved deciple) along with Paul, and every other apostle were Jewish men who believed that Christ was the Messiah of Judaism. This idea of these early Christians not understanding their religion is extremely reductive. These were intelligent men who wrote text still read to this day. Also in contemporary Judaism and Christianity The Tanakh (or Hebrew Bible or Old Testament) is almost word for word the same in a JPS Tanakh as it is in a NSRV Or other scholarly translation of the Christian Bible so the difference is definitely not that large. Also to say that Islam did not branch off of Christianity and Judaism is unfair if we say Christianity is a misinterpretation of Judaism. Mohammad lived in Mecca before his revelations from Allah which was a multicultural and multi religious hub where he was introduced to several religions both poly and mono theistic. There is also evidence that he had an uncle who was part of a heretical Eastern Orthodox Church where many ideas in Islam can be seen originating from. Islam admits that there is truth in both the Jewish and Christian faith but that they misinterpreted what Allah revealed to people.
@@hankgilchrest6061 the "Christans probably to jesus his time but they as well saw themselfs as jews and not as Christians the first people to call them selfs Christians and have an broader Repräsentation of their belive till today where the greek Christians whom where uncapable of understanding hebrew theirfor till today their are major differences in the english tenakh and the old tastemant in english modern bibles like no doubt their where some Christians who had a better understanding but the majority till today dont really learn the old tastement from jews their for their is a huge Lack in knowlegde when it cones to interpretation ect i mean i aint even pullin that out of my ass their are enough Christian schoolars who have discussed that on their own and camr to the same Co conclusion even if u compared today in analogy u will get fast the impression that early "christans" didnt had a well understanding of the old tastemant and this remains until today because some of the misinterpretations are key when coming to explaining Christian Mythology as an example some Christians say that in Islam their is a cross refference to jesus when their is said to be a suffering King whom will be Born from a Virgin in isiah but intrestingly enough the hebrew word isnt Virgin vut young woman even the orginal greek word used in the first greek bibley is young woman but even the greek Christians in that time interpretet the young woman to Virgin because they saw it as similar enough to be a cross reference as well i am not trying to attack u Personaly or anything but as well the comparison to Islam and it viel of Jesus is not a similar case to christianitys misinterpretation of jewish Text as well as it is well known under Christian schoolars for a long time that their are root Problems of Translation ect in the bible espacily the old tastemant its a New era thing for apolegetic Christians to claim These things if u would go to Harvard to Studi Christian theolegy or history or anything in between this are gonna be facts u will be confronted with i mean about most things u can even read it online
Support our channel by buying some cool mythological merch HERE! mythossafari.com/
Nice video. Thanks for the link from other channel
Appreciate you!
This is a fantastic video! It was very informative, well done. Thank you very much. :)
Glad you enjoyed it!
Yess I was waiting for this one
🤩
The main thing about the Leveyason mentioned in Jewish texts is the fight between it and the shor habor in the tines of Moshiach
Great. How about making AI video of the stories of Rabbah Bar Bar Hanna
😮😮
omni-potence?
Om-Nip-Uh-Tense
Yes my bad hahahah
@@MythosSafari all good 😁👍
Great video
You should make videos about the pheonix in Judaism, the shamir worm, and some giant creatures mentioned in the talmud.
I wonder what mystical birds in Judaism there are
We will have to do it in the future for sure!
@MythosSafari just curious, is this considered a Jewish channel?
Agent apocalypse
Saying Christianity misinterpreted Judaism is not a good way to word that. One could say the same of Islam to Christianity with the Muslim myth around the crucifixion of Christ. It's not a misinterpretaion as much as a seperate tradition from the same roots. Think Catholic vs Orthodox, Sunni vs Shia, Hasidic vs reform, etc
But at the end of the day, it's a misinterpretation 😊
@@MythosSafari It really isn't though, yes one branched out from the other but it doesn't mean it's a misinterpretaion. Now of this is coming from a inherently Jewish perspective then yes it is but you seem to be presenting a much more secular scholarly style approach thus it's unfair to generalize a world religion (and the biggest one at that) as a misinterpretaion. Especially considering talking about the ideas of heaven and hell presented in the Christian New testament. The hell is still talked about extremely abstractly. The Gehenna which is mentioned is a trash pit near Jerusalem and Heaven is mentioned very rarely. There are better descriptions of heaven in the Hebrew Bible then the Christian New Testament with the prophets seeing God's throne and the angels around it. Most ideas in contemporary Christianity of Heaven and Hell are less scripturally based and more based on the stories of Dante and Milton. It also should be said that the New Testament deals in parable throughout so the idea of Leviathan being used could be allegory for the size of sin in the world. I enjoyed the video but it's little things like that which can be a distraction to an otherwise phenomenal piece of content. Also the beasts of Revelation are rich enough in their own right that a video on them individually could be wonderful especially in your style. Lumping them in as Leviathan when it's most likely a description to compare scale of the creature seems like a stretch and could limit content in the long run. Also calling it the Jewish Leviathan and then discussing it in Christianity and Islam limits the richness of all three traditions by linking them too intrinsically. Though they all share the patriarch of Abraham Islam has never claimed to be Christianity or Judaism and Christians have not claimed to be Jews since at least 150 CE when churches started being seperate then the home synagogues of the Jews in Diaspora from the Romans.
The thing is Islam didnt branchend of from christianity or judaism therfor to say that the depiction of Jesus in the quran could be seen as misinterpretation while its sources doesent come from judaism lr christianity is Hard but if Christians see things in the old tastemant different than classic judaism wich is defines well its understanding of the old hebrew bible this is what u would call a misinterpretation because many things doesnt even make sense if look at the anolgy of certain words and charackters to reinterpretat it in a way Christians do in a way their for most certanliy christianity has a pretty distorted understanding if the old hebrew bible most liköy because most Christians in many years of the beginning of christianity didnt had any understanding of hebrew and where used to trust not trust worthy Translation from all over the place
@@shenron8262the early Christians had the exact same Hebrew Bibles as the Jews of the time due to the fact that they saw themselves as Jews because in the Christian Tradition Jesus is the Jewish Messiah so if the Christian texts were mistranslations then so were the Jewish ones and thus both are misinterpreted. The Early Church fathers included St.Peter (The Rock upon which the church was built) and St.John (the beloved deciple) along with Paul, and every other apostle were Jewish men who believed that Christ was the Messiah of Judaism. This idea of these early Christians not understanding their religion is extremely reductive. These were intelligent men who wrote text still read to this day. Also in contemporary Judaism and Christianity The Tanakh (or Hebrew Bible or Old Testament) is almost word for word the same in a JPS Tanakh as it is in a NSRV Or other scholarly translation of the Christian Bible so the difference is definitely not that large. Also to say that Islam did not branch off of Christianity and Judaism is unfair if we say Christianity is a misinterpretation of Judaism. Mohammad lived in Mecca before his revelations from Allah which was a multicultural and multi religious hub where he was introduced to several religions both poly and mono theistic. There is also evidence that he had an uncle who was part of a heretical Eastern Orthodox Church where many ideas in Islam can be seen originating from. Islam admits that there is truth in both the Jewish and Christian faith but that they misinterpreted what Allah revealed to people.
@@hankgilchrest6061 the "Christans probably to jesus his time but they as well saw themselfs as jews and not as Christians the first people to call them selfs Christians and have an broader Repräsentation of their belive till today where the greek Christians whom where uncapable of understanding hebrew theirfor till today their are major differences in the english tenakh and the old tastemant in english modern bibles like no doubt their where some Christians who had a better understanding but the majority till today dont really learn the old tastement from jews their for their is a huge Lack in knowlegde when it cones to interpretation ect i mean i aint even pullin that out of my ass their are enough Christian schoolars who have discussed that on their own and camr to the same Co conclusion even if u compared today in analogy u will get fast the impression that early "christans" didnt had a well understanding of the old tastemant and this remains until today because some of the misinterpretations are key when coming to explaining Christian Mythology as an example some Christians say that in Islam their is a cross refference to jesus when their is said to be a suffering King whom will be Born from a Virgin in isiah but intrestingly enough the hebrew word isnt Virgin vut young woman even the orginal greek word used in the first greek bibley is young woman but even the greek Christians in that time interpretet the young woman to Virgin because they saw it as similar enough to be a cross reference as well i am not trying to attack u Personaly or anything but as well the comparison to Islam and it viel of Jesus is not a similar case to christianitys misinterpretation of jewish Text as well as it is well known under Christian schoolars for a long time that their are root Problems of Translation ect in the bible espacily the old tastemant its a New era thing for apolegetic Christians to claim These things if u would go to Harvard to Studi Christian theolegy or history or anything in between this are gonna be facts u will be confronted with i mean about most things u can even read it online