Wow. Grew up around Massey Fergusons. My dad was a dealer. Never before have I seen a double tractor. Amazing in simplicity. We sold Oliver too and it was the more popular for Ag use then though.
4:15 that FE35 with the quad rear wheels is pulling the last two wheels on a hitch.. i feel like its wasted potential because those wheels are connected to a gearbox and you could just connected it to a PTO.. maybe replace the hitch with a proper parallelogram suspension.
1100, struggling to turn already worked ground with one bottom too many. And the double 35, like it really makes the power to need the extra traction. Now the tandem 35s pulling a 4 bottom basically eliminated a second operator.
Je suis intéressé. Est ce que je peut acheter un tracteur MF simple par faciliter 200 dinars/TN par mois. Je m'attendais votre réponse s'il vous plaît. Merci.
Lived on a farm my entire life. Never seen a tandem tractor like this using the PTO to power a second set of Drive wheels. Looks like no articulation creates a lot of understeer. Really cool!
Ok I get it you started out with two basket cases 35s to get one running. then used what was left over for the rear attachment that can be bolted up NICE!
I have been going through your vids. Enjoyed and have owned Massey when I was younger and will always remember her. I know sounds corny but I am a machine operator and a complete enthusiastic of mostly post 1980,s machines. Keep up good work mate!
I farmed for 45 years and used a plow only once, but I have run a 43 ft cultivator. Do they always plow so fast or were they trying to show off? Was that 130 drill a no-till outfit? It seemed to be working poorly in that loose ground.
I'm not a Massey Ferguson fan even though I got 3 when I bought a farm turn key was only way he would sell. They are showing off plowing or else Massey Ferguson tractors are worse than I thought. No depth, pulling crooked in pre worked ground. The 130 seeder claimed to be no till but they never caught on. Guess you can see why.
That poor old 1100 was wheel slipping badly pulling that 6 bottom plow. If you had have adjusted the hitch properly it would have pulled it better. With our soil here we would pull only 5 bottoms at 4 inches deep.
Did the Massey copy serbian IMT tractors or did the serbians copy massey?Because that 35 is the same as IMT 533 and that 1200 looks like some IMT models to.
Yea back before I have memory my family had two 1100's. They had a five furrow for plowing, not sure of the size. Clearly that soil has been broken sometime recently.
Congratulations! you have taken a perfectly good and indeed quite rare tractor ( i.e. a Massey Ferguson 35 with a 4 cylinder spark ignition engine) and completely ruined it.
Ford, Farmall, and Ferguson all made double tractor conversions for more horse power and traction before bigger tractors had been built. Not too mention the fact that the entire setup appears to be bolted on and designed to be removed.
No. What they have there are perfectly good and even rarer versions of tractors from the past. To take them apart would be ruining a part of history. One of the best engineers in the world is a farmer in need of something that either isn’t available or something he can’t afford.
Wow, what a dumbass... yeah, im sure he built that recently. And as said, surely done back when it was at least fairly new and probably made it MORE valuable. And he probably has EVERYTHING sitting in a barn to convert it back. These old guys did shit right, not like idiots today. They'd take an extra 5 minutes to keep everything intact where you can just unbolt it and put it back to stock. And hold onto the extra parts, know exactly where they are and stored em properly.
It's like people genuinely don't understand that shit we have today, didn't always exist. And people USED to make/modify things. So when what you could buy, or afford, wouldn't quite do what you needed, you got inventive.
For the f.. sake what is wrong with you ?!?!?! how can you be that stupid!!!! can't you simply imagine that in 50ties and 60ties there was no technology to build powerful 4x4 tractors ?!?!? that's why they start to build tandems in those days to cope with the demand !!!!
Ummm, have people REALLY gotten this stupid? Do you not have ANY concept of how tractors work? You DOUBLE the power AND traction, a 4x4 doesn't do that. I mean, a modern tractor of a given weight compared to a 50's model will probably have double the power. But that's just modernized engines, maybe not with all the emissions crap... but 4x4's generally have smaller front tires= less mechanical advantage. Less weight than sticking basically 2/3 of another tractor on the nose= less traction and weight transfer on the draw bar. There was no sell this one and go buy a bigger 4x4, these WERE the 4 wheel drives. Of course, when a single tractor will get the job done, you'd be wasting fuel with one of these. But you waste a lot of time with an extra hand running another tractor, as well. There is a trade off, but it pays big in the right situation. Just may be too "simple" a solution for your massive intelect... now THAT is sarcasm.
Wow. Grew up around Massey Fergusons. My dad was a dealer. Never before have I seen a double tractor. Amazing in simplicity. We sold Oliver too and it was the more popular for Ag use then though.
4:15 that FE35 with the quad rear wheels is pulling the last two wheels on a hitch.. i feel like its wasted potential because those wheels are connected to a gearbox and you could just connected it to a PTO.. maybe replace the hitch with a proper parallelogram suspension.
1100, struggling to turn already worked ground with one bottom too many. And the double 35, like it really makes the power to need the extra traction. Now the tandem 35s pulling a 4 bottom basically eliminated a second operator.
Je suis intéressé. Est ce que je peut acheter un tracteur MF simple par faciliter 200 dinars/TN par mois. Je m'attendais votre réponse s'il vous plaît. Merci.
Lived on a farm my entire life. Never seen a tandem tractor like this using the PTO to power a second set of Drive wheels. Looks like no articulation creates a lot of understeer. Really cool!
Cool tractors but poor follow through with your video definitely should show more detail and how they did the connections of the tractors
Aaah, how the hell did youtube know I used to drive around on an MF 35 as a kid?! Lovely old tractor, isn't it? Those things never die.
CarlOlav hhvb
CarlOlav apart from if the water pump stops working properly
hydraulic problem won't let down. video
CarlOlav the MF138 is better
Ok I get it you started out with two basket cases 35s to get one running. then used what was left over for the rear attachment
that can be bolted up NICE!
I have been going through your vids. Enjoyed and have owned Massey when I was younger and will always remember her. I know sounds corny but I am a machine operator and a complete enthusiastic of mostly post 1980,s machines. Keep up good work mate!
your plough isn't pulling straight.
big D fan
7
big D fan its a 6 bottom plow
big D fan “
I farmed for 45 years and used a plow only once, but I have run a 43 ft cultivator. Do they always plow so fast or were they trying to show off? Was that 130 drill a no-till outfit? It seemed to be working poorly in that loose ground.
I'm not a Massey Ferguson fan even though I got 3 when I bought a farm turn key was only way he would sell. They are showing off plowing or else Massey Ferguson tractors are worse than I thought. No depth, pulling crooked in pre worked ground. The 130 seeder claimed to be no till but they never caught on. Guess you can see why.
O Double é 70 cavalos?
Liniker Augusto só tem um motor deve ser 35cv
That poor old 1100 was wheel slipping badly pulling that 6 bottom plow. If you had have adjusted the hitch properly it would have pulled it better. With our soil here we would pull only 5 bottoms at 4 inches deep.
Did the Massey copy serbian IMT tractors or did the serbians copy massey?Because that 35 is the same as IMT 533 and that 1200 looks like some IMT models to.
Yugoslavia bought the licence from MF!! google or Wiki it !!!
Normal sürülmemiş toprağı 10 bıçakla asla süremez, zorlama,ve motor çok kısa sürede sekman yer
UA-cam:Janusz Pijanka
wojna z Donbassu i inne
Enoga Febo Quatro sigurno je stigao iz Srbije!
6 bottoms on an 1100!? The soils around here we could BARELY pull 5 16s!!
Yea back before I have memory my family had two 1100's. They had a five furrow for plowing, not sure of the size. Clearly that soil has been broken sometime recently.
vendo trator ford 8br em bom estado de comservasiom
Just...WHY?
2:48
Trattori. Per. Bamdini
wideo z Rosji, może ktoś taki ua-cam.com/video/-pExDW9Wv1U/v-deo.html
Jai kisan
O
I'd like to see him with the MF-35 plow my gravel ground before some one else plowed it first.
Photo shopped thumbnail, oh wait.... ;)
Congratulations! you have taken a perfectly good and indeed quite rare tractor ( i.e. a Massey Ferguson 35 with a 4 cylinder spark ignition engine) and completely ruined it.
Ford, Farmall, and Ferguson all made double tractor conversions for more horse power and traction before bigger tractors had been built. Not too mention the fact that the entire setup appears to be bolted on and designed to be removed.
No. What they have there are perfectly good and even rarer versions of tractors from the past. To take them apart would be ruining a part of history.
One of the best engineers in the world is a farmer in need of something that either isn’t available or something he can’t afford.
I guess an English built spark ignition is rare? Over here they're all over.
Wow, what a dumbass... yeah, im sure he built that recently. And as said, surely done back when it was at least fairly new and probably made it MORE valuable. And he probably has EVERYTHING sitting in a barn to convert it back. These old guys did shit right, not like idiots today. They'd take an extra 5 minutes to keep everything intact where you can just unbolt it and put it back to stock. And hold onto the extra parts, know exactly where they are and stored em properly.
It's like people genuinely don't understand that shit we have today, didn't always exist. And people USED to make/modify things. So when what you could buy, or afford, wouldn't quite do what you needed, you got inventive.
Because ti makes more sense to weld together 2 tractors, instead of using 1 normal. Wow. *sarcasm*
..?
For the f.. sake what is wrong with you ?!?!?! how can you be that stupid!!!! can't you simply imagine that in 50ties and 60ties there was no technology to build powerful 4x4 tractors ?!?!? that's why they start to build tandems in those days to cope with the demand !!!!
Ummm, have people REALLY gotten this stupid? Do you not have ANY concept of how tractors work? You DOUBLE the power AND traction, a 4x4 doesn't do that. I mean, a modern tractor of a given weight compared to a 50's model will probably have double the power. But that's just modernized engines, maybe not with all the emissions crap... but 4x4's generally have smaller front tires= less mechanical advantage. Less weight than sticking basically 2/3 of another tractor on the nose= less traction and weight transfer on the draw bar. There was no sell this one and go buy a bigger 4x4, these WERE the 4 wheel drives. Of course, when a single tractor will get the job done, you'd be wasting fuel with one of these. But you waste a lot of time with an extra hand running another tractor, as well. There is a trade off, but it pays big in the right situation. Just may be too "simple" a solution for your massive intelect... now THAT is sarcasm.
Not impressed. Time wasted!
Face it. Your whole life is a waste.
WTF?!
zjebane traktory jak to wyglada
Michal Pawlikowski