If you enjoyed this video, then kindly do me this favor: Grab the link to this video and throw it on LinkedIn. I'm certain you know someone that could also benefit from understanding Supernetting. That would really help me out. Thank you.
I’m a networking professional with lots of experience of large networks. Love these videos to freshen up the fundamentals. Using software and IPAM tools makes us complacent. Good refresher.
Subnetting had me stumped for over a month until I saw this series. I understood the concept but just couldn't get the calculations down. Well done and thank you!
This video was EXCELLENT. The chart was super useful, visualizing REALLY helped; the scratch paper method made perfect sense, as well, and was explained so clearly.
Honestly, this one was reminiscent of having the training wheels removed when I was learning to ride a bike 😁 As a visual learner, the gradual removal of the diagrams threw me off a bit... but your excellent teaching skills kept me on track. I'm immensely grateful for this series. Thank you! ⭐
such a breeze. this video should look up to 100k+ likes). I'd like to append - the best subnetting video I have seen on youtube, and i have seen many. Great!
I have to put everything from this Subentting playlist in one 20min presentation. F But i really enjoyed this series. it is well explained and easy to understand
Please consider applying your talents towards IPv6 addressing, and DNS as two major topics. Most of the tutorials on DNS for instance tend to be superficial.
@@PracticalNetworking couldn't agree more! IPv6, which is not covered so much in the 200-301 content (probably even less before), and, in my opinion, some way to make WAN interesting, and one of your OSPF DEEP DIVE-levels on IPsec /vpn. It would pair well with the TLS course, I think, and explained the way you did the tsl course, would be a great buy. . Thanks, man.
first of all, this is GOLD standard content. but I'd just like to comment on scenario 6. An increment of 8 will not land at .162 nor the increment of 16. And even in a hypothetical scenario an increment of 8 from .162 is not gonna include .170 as it is already the network ID of the next address block, is that correct, Ed?
Amazing list in The UA-cam , many thanks friend for this that give us idea about how slove the problems of - Network ID - Brodcast - first ip , last ip - network Could you please add video about how slove the Questions that asking about - number of networks - host in all networks - host in each network With your way also there are many methods but we want something from your side There are many questions about them
Glad you enjoyed this! I believe I covered those other questions in the FLSM and VLSM videos: - ua-cam.com/video/F05sDLXOFh8/v-deo.html - ua-cam.com/video/amKyfbg5G2Q/v-deo.html If not, then you're welcome to ask more specific questions in discord: pracnet.net/discord Cheers !
It's simply an arbitrarily chosen first 3 octets. You could replace 9.9.9 with any other three numbers and the calculations would still work. (Except example #6, since that one bleeds into the 3rd Octet)
Hi I have a question, if I were to use Exact Match on the example no. 4, is using /31 ok, to save more ip addresses? you also added in the last video that broadcast ip address is not that useful so disregarding it is fine, so using /31 is fine, especially we're just allocating addresses that cant be grouped into higher group sizes without using many unecessary addresses?
Hi Logan, Yes, you can absolutely use a /31 when summarizing. The Network ID / Broadcast being unusable is only relative to configuring IP addresses on a network. For instance, if you had 8 devices on a network, you couldn't use a /29 for that network because there aren't enough IP addresses. But if you are merely telling a Router to route "these 8 IP addresses" a certain direction, then using a /29 is perfectly fine. In the same way, if you are trying to tell a Router to "route these 2 IP addresses" a certain direction, then it's perfectly fine to use a /31.
If you enjoyed this video, then kindly do me this favor: Grab the link to this video and throw it on LinkedIn. I'm certain you know someone that could also benefit from understanding Supernetting. That would really help me out. Thank you.
This is probably the best network content video I´ve ever watched. The most informative and leaving the longest lasting impression and usefulness.
Thank you, Espartaco.
I’m a networking professional with lots of experience of large networks. Love these videos to freshen up the fundamentals. Using software and IPAM tools makes us complacent. Good refresher.
Glad you enjoyed this series, Pascal =).
Bro this is best ever networking series in the Internet, you are the Best of the Best !
Subnetting had me stumped for over a month until I saw this series. I understood the concept but just couldn't get the calculations down. Well done and thank you!
This video was EXCELLENT. The chart was super useful, visualizing REALLY helped; the scratch paper method made perfect sense, as well, and was explained so clearly.
Thanks again Scott =). So happy to see you getting so much value from this content.
These are the best networking videos I have ever seen. Thank you! Hope you make more.
Thank you for the kind words, Aleksandrs =)
Honestly, this one was reminiscent of having the training wheels removed when I was learning to ride a bike 😁 As a visual learner, the gradual removal of the diagrams threw me off a bit... but your excellent teaching skills kept me on track. I'm immensely grateful for this series. Thank you! ⭐
Thank you for the kind words, I'm thrilled you go so much out of this series and the effort & curriculum design was not wasted. You're very welcome!
This was a very well made video. I would like to thank you for putting all of this together.
You're very welcome, Eric. Glad you enjoyed it =)
Thanks for the visualizations , this made the points more clear .
Glad to hear, Rahul. Glad you enjoyed it!
Awesome video, as usual, Thanks, Ed!
Hi Carlos! Thank you for all your support =)
Thank you so much for these videos
Excellent explanation. Thankssssss!
You're welcome!
such a breeze. this video should look up to 100k+ likes). I'd like to append - the best subnetting video I have seen on youtube, and i have seen many. Great!
Hi Igor =) Thank you for the kind words. If you have any suggestions on how to get to 100k, I'm all ears =). Either way, glad you enjoyed these.
I have to put everything from this Subentting playlist in one 20min presentation. F
But i really enjoyed this series. it is well explained and easy to understand
If you watch it on 1.5 speed, it becomes 20 minutes. =)
Glad you enjoyed it.
@@PracticalNetworking thx to you I got my A+ on that presentation
Great video!
GREAT EXPLANATION
Thank you =)
Please consider applying your talents towards IPv6 addressing, and DNS as two major topics. Most of the tutorials on DNS for instance tend to be superficial.
Both of those are on my list to cover at some point. I have big plans for IPv6, in fact (SubnetIPv6.com)
I can't wait!!!
@@PracticalNetworking couldn't agree more! IPv6, which is not covered so much in the 200-301 content (probably even less before), and, in my opinion, some way to make WAN interesting, and one of your OSPF DEEP DIVE-levels on IPsec /vpn. It would pair well with the TLS course, I think, and explained the way you did the tsl course, would be a great buy. . Thanks, man.
🔰 Hiya Ed,
Super instructional content...well presented and produced 👍
Thank you, Dave =)
@28:35 If we take block size 8, it will go as 9.9.160.0 to 9.9.167.255. It ousted our 170 so we took block size 16. Am I Right @practical networking
Yes, looks right to me =)
I was surprised when I clicked on this video and you didn’t have an Indian accent 🤓
;)
first of all, this is GOLD standard content. but I'd just like to comment on scenario 6. An increment of 8 will not land at .162 nor the increment of 16. And even in a hypothetical scenario an increment of 8 from .162 is not gonna include .170 as it is already the network ID of the next address block, is that correct, Ed?
Damn! You are the best.
Thanks Azza =). Cheers!
Amazing list in The UA-cam , many thanks friend for this that give us idea about how slove the problems of
- Network ID
- Brodcast
- first ip , last ip
- network
Could you please add video about how slove the Questions that asking about
- number of networks
- host in all networks
- host in each network
With your way also there are many methods but we want something from your side
There are many questions about them
Glad you enjoyed this!
I believe I covered those other questions in the FLSM and VLSM videos:
- ua-cam.com/video/F05sDLXOFh8/v-deo.html
- ua-cam.com/video/amKyfbg5G2Q/v-deo.html
If not, then you're welcome to ask more specific questions in discord: pracnet.net/discord
Cheers !
Hello sir , i do not get where you`re getting 9.9.9.9 all the time ,please can you say something about it please ? thank you so much
It's simply an arbitrarily chosen first 3 octets. You could replace 9.9.9 with any other three numbers and the calculations would still work. (Except example #6, since that one bleeds into the 3rd Octet)
Hi I have a question, if I were to use Exact Match on the example no. 4, is using /31 ok, to save more ip addresses? you also added in the last video that broadcast ip address is not that useful so disregarding it is fine, so using /31 is fine, especially we're just allocating addresses that cant be grouped into higher group sizes without using many unecessary addresses?
Hi Logan, Yes, you can absolutely use a /31 when summarizing.
The Network ID / Broadcast being unusable is only relative to configuring IP addresses on a network.
For instance, if you had 8 devices on a network, you couldn't use a /29 for that network because there aren't enough IP addresses. But if you are merely telling a Router to route "these 8 IP addresses" a certain direction, then using a /29 is perfectly fine.
In the same way, if you are trying to tell a Router to "route these 2 IP addresses" a certain direction, then it's perfectly fine to use a /31.
sir please do video about BGP and pvst
BGP and PVST are on my list. BGP will be a full course some day.
@@PracticalNetworking Thank you sir...🙏
sir please do about spanning tree protocol
It's on the list =)
@@PracticalNetworking thank you sir...
If I'm thinking about the idea correctly, it's sort of a **little** bit like finding the least common denominator.
Yes, there are some similarities =).
👍👍👍
Hmm
Hope that's a positive "Hmm" ! =)
Excellent!!!!!!