Lec 05 Practical Transformer I Electrical machine I Genique education

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 47

  • @goyaldeekshant
    @goyaldeekshant 4 роки тому +5

    I could not find any reason to stop myself from liking this video.

  • @dvoorganisation459
    @dvoorganisation459 2 роки тому +1

    ❤❤❤❤ Hardworking teachers like you are needed

  • @premgolaniya9000
    @premgolaniya9000 4 роки тому

    Thanku very much
    Pankaj shukla sir

  • @darapuhemanth6644
    @darapuhemanth6644 3 роки тому

    Sir on loading the transformer current in the primary coil increases , incresed current compensate flux ...so I(m) must be changed no sir...?

  • @AmitKumar-pc9sw
    @AmitKumar-pc9sw 5 років тому +5

    Sir, it should be V1 instead of E1 & E2 in the phasor diagram... E1, E2 & V2 should lag V1 by 180 degrees( or be in phase opposition to V1). But considering clockwise as lag, your phasor is showing E1 &E2 in the wrong direction. Correct me if I'm wrong.
    Thank you for your easy to understand lectures, sir...

  • @electro-magnetik528
    @electro-magnetik528 3 роки тому

    considering lenz law, e1,e2 must lag flux phi ....but here its leading...please clarify sir @GeniqueEducation

  • @ankitmakwana2648
    @ankitmakwana2648 6 років тому +1

    Thank you sir for such an awesome lectures..

  • @saikatmukherjee2548
    @saikatmukherjee2548 6 місяців тому

    kindly specify that you are using circuit theory approach not dot convention.

  • @Sscvocab100
    @Sscvocab100 5 років тому +3

    What about phasor diagram of practical loaded transformer... Sir... Please suggest🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @ravindraprasaddangwal9021
    @ravindraprasaddangwal9021 5 років тому

    Sir is induced voltage in primary side should lagg aur lead by induced flux.. Please explain.... You draw phaser for transformer shows induced voltage leads by induced flux!!

  • @mohitdhiman1536
    @mohitdhiman1536 4 роки тому

    E1 and E2 should be lagging behind the main flux. If not please clear sir.

  • @falconkv8348
    @falconkv8348 6 років тому

    keep it up sir to complete it before janury.....

  • @razzakahmad8731
    @razzakahmad8731 3 роки тому

    Sir I think you should clarify the fact that you are using circuit theory approach instead of field theory approach while writing the faraday's law or while representing the induced emf in the primary or secondary.
    Because I was also confused about it. I checked Stephen J Chapman, Fitzgerald they have used circuit theory approach but Indian authors like PS bhimbra and Ashfaq Hussain they have used field theory approach. (That's why there phasor diagram differs)
    To the folks who are confused you should know both are the correct ways to study internal working of transformer.
    That's the only reason why induced emf in these lectures is leading the phy or i(t). Whereas in bhimbra the phy or i(t) is leading the induced voltages.
    So my only doubt is in written competitive exams which phasor diagram should be preferred?

  • @AmitYadav-dk8jd
    @AmitYadav-dk8jd 4 роки тому

    Thank you sir ...

  • @bituphukon6954
    @bituphukon6954 5 років тому +2

    Sir in 17:17 ma apne l1 ko lo kase liya. Plz explain

    • @sarvagyavarma
      @sarvagyavarma 5 років тому

      no load hai es liye b'coz secondary current i2 is zero so i2desh is also zero so i1=i0

  • @dipalimali9642
    @dipalimali9642 5 років тому +2

    Sir please explain the polarity of Voltage across load

    • @AsifAkhtar20
      @AsifAkhtar20 3 роки тому +1

      v2 is parallel to E2, hence it will follow the same polarity naturally

  • @deepakdamodaran4444
    @deepakdamodaran4444 4 роки тому

    Thank you sir

  • @b.csinha7554
    @b.csinha7554 5 років тому +1

    Why do we use j???? Like what's the need of j???

  • @AnilKumar-ob7yx
    @AnilKumar-ob7yx 6 років тому

    Sir explanation is very good

  • @Desididishreya
    @Desididishreya 5 років тому +1

    Sir..
    Supply current or produced flux hamesha inphase rahega na !!!
    Please clr my doubt

    • @SagarKumar-ev9wj
      @SagarKumar-ev9wj 5 років тому +2

      No. Magnetizing current (Im ) aur flux phase me honge.

  • @akshaydhingra5545
    @akshaydhingra5545 5 років тому

    can anybody tell why is Rc added in parallel

  • @exampoint8079
    @exampoint8079 6 років тому

    Thank you very much sir
    Awesome lecture sir

  • @rupakpal205
    @rupakpal205 4 роки тому

    Sir, why using V1 bar instead of V1?

  • @IrfanMujawar
    @IrfanMujawar 6 років тому

    Sir in phasor diagrams why supply voltage is not shown?
    Where to show supply voltage phasor?

    • @vishalsharma-pk6zn
      @vishalsharma-pk6zn 6 років тому

      show it in phase with e1

    • @vishalsharma-pk6zn
      @vishalsharma-pk6zn 6 років тому

      if the losses are neglected

    • @deepakchandrashekarappa9060
      @deepakchandrashekarappa9060 5 років тому +1

      vishal sharma correct me if my understanding is wrong, E1 is the voltage which is the induced voltage which opposes the applied voltage V1, how can it be in inphase with V1?

    • @umeshsingh-du3pk
      @umeshsingh-du3pk 5 років тому +1

      vishal sharma how can we show supply voltage in same phase with e1. e1 is opposing the supply voltage by lenz law. So it'll be out of phase.

    • @umeshsingh-du3pk
      @umeshsingh-du3pk 5 років тому

      Deepak Chandrashekarappa you're right, supply voltage will be 180° out of phase

  • @SurajKumar-bq6if
    @SurajKumar-bq6if 5 років тому

    Sir aap transformer me ek important cheez miss kar dete ho (phasor) diagram

  • @SurajKumar-bq6if
    @SurajKumar-bq6if 5 років тому

    I2’=kI2 then it become zero

  • @Topperscoachingcentreguraru
    @Topperscoachingcentreguraru 5 років тому +1

    Fresh likhie sir

  • @spidermama5597
    @spidermama5597 6 років тому

    19 Ko kya hai??