The shinier one is the real one, because it has finer details, and because it has that characteristic crazy ducat thinness. The more matted one looks like it has cruder details, and looks a bit thicker, probably because without that extra bit of thickness, they could never get it to weigh the correct amount for a 4 ducat gold coin.
This one on the right is the real one. Reach in details, shinny finish and tin. The coin on the left looks thicker (Nordic gold with same weight of the real one?)
Yes the one on the right is real, the left is a fake. The fake one was evident to us straight away as the strike wasnt perfect and the coin was far too thick to be a real 1915 Ducat
well they re both not "real" in the sense of "minted in 1915". these are still being minted today and all have the 1915 date. they were originally only minted until 1914 so the 1915 date on these new ones makes it easy to distinguish as "fake"
@@Chard1964Ltd ok Sir I lost this time I think😉, the proof like finish in the ducat was suspect to me, I have fractional doesn't look so shiny, keep posting nice stuff thanks
@@mikoum4699 We think that this one has possibly been cleaned at some point in its lifetime! however, the one on the left of the video had almost 0 gold content, and was too thick for a Ducat!
Shiny one on the right is real. Has the thinness and the details. The proof like finish is very common on the 1915 dated bullion strikes.
Most Probably the shiny one is real but to be sure you should show the thickness of both, diameter weight and sound then i can tell hehe
The shinier one is the real one, because it has finer details, and because it has that characteristic crazy ducat thinness. The more matted one looks like it has cruder details, and looks a bit thicker, probably because without that extra bit of thickness, they could never get it to weigh the correct amount for a 4 ducat gold coin.
This one on the right is the real one. Reach in details, shinny finish and tin. The coin on the left looks thicker (Nordic gold with same weight of the real one?)
Yes the one on the right is real, the left is a fake. The fake one was evident to us straight away as the strike wasnt perfect and the coin was far too thick to be a real 1915 Ducat
@@Chard1964Ltd nice! I'm not an expert at all, I'm glad that I'm learning how to spot fake coins! Thanks!
Cine a investit in Ducati Austria Franz Iozeph a câștigat enorm costa peste 1000de € unul !👍
At the end...which is which?
Tot ce este stanta cu 1915 sau mai înainte este bun restul sunt placați ce poarta aia care vor sa se de-a bogați dar sunt luci !😂😂😂
These are 23.5 karats, i dont think they'll tone. The one on the right is real
I think the shiny one is the fake.🧐
I'll give you one more guess ;)
Shiny is fake
well they re both not "real" in the sense of "minted in 1915".
these are still being minted today and all have the 1915 date.
they were originally only minted until 1914 so the 1915 date on these new ones makes it easy to distinguish as "fake"
The shiny one at the right is fake
hmm are you sure? ;)
@@Chard1964Ltd ok Sir I lost this time I think😉, the proof like finish in the ducat was suspect to me, I have fractional doesn't look so shiny, keep posting nice stuff thanks
@@mikoum4699 We think that this one has possibly been cleaned at some point in its lifetime! however, the one on the left of the video had almost 0 gold content, and was too thick for a Ducat!
Shiny one on the right is fake, the one on the left looks older and worn