The AI man says "Nikon has already introduced the Expeed 8 processor in some of their models." Really?! Uh, no, that’s total BS crap from an AI voice with older clips copied from several other channels. A lot of other sheer speculation. Also, the Z9 & Z8 already have sensor readout speeds of just under 0.4 milliseconds and the claim here is that this will be new the super-fast readout on the updated Z9. That’s just plain stupid. And anything that doesn’t have a readout speed of zero is not a global shutter. Also Nikon can be pronounced two ways but never is it 'nee-kon'. Wow, I have to wonder who the 4.85K subscribers actually are that think channels like this are even remotely legit. I’m a Nikon user and love to hear good things that will be coming from Nikon soon but this is just complete nonsense.
The claims about Nikon's Expeed 8 processor and super-fast sensor readout are inaccurate and speculative, with misinformation from unreliable AI sources. Nikon's Z9 and Z8 already have fast sensor readout speeds, and the pronunciation debate is unnecessary. Such channels lack credibility despite their follower count.
"Also, the Z9 & Z8 already have sensor readout speeds of just under 0.4 milliseconds." Actually it's 4.2 milliseconds. I guess we're dealing with fake AI videos and fake AI commenters. By all means, carry on...lol.
@@gocannon0 Both pronunciations can be considered acceptable depending on regional accents, but "nigh-kon" is more common outside Japan, while "nee-kon" aligns more closely with the original Japanese.
@@RobertFalconer1967 The sensor readout speed for the Nikon Z9 and Z8 is indeed around 4.2 milliseconds. However, there's no need to jump to conclusions about fake information-errors in specs can happen, but it's always best to double-check the facts.
How this AI BS channel gets more views than other real human channels is crazy. viewers really need to ban and cancel AI channels. Say no to AI bs faceless channles.
I Really Like your Comment, AI channels offer unique content that many viewers enjoy, which is why they attract a larger audience. Rather than banning them, it's about letting viewers decide what they prefer, whether it's AI-generated or human-made content. There's room for both to coexist.
If it’s built, the Z9H would be the true D6 replacement that Press, sports and wildlife photographers require. 20.5mp is more then enough for those applications.
While 20.5MP might be enough for many sports, press, and wildlife photographers, a higher resolution like what the rumored Z9h could offer would provide more flexibility for cropping and capturing fine details. A true D6 replacement would also need to go beyond just resolution, offering features like faster performance, improved autofocus, and potentially a global shutter for even better action shots.
@@kytoober5137 Higher resolution combined with a Small RAW option would indeed offer flexibility, allowing photographers to capture detailed shots while saving space when needed. Many recent cameras do offer such options, giving the best of both worlds for quality and file management.
Rumors only. Nikon over the years has relied on Sony for sensors. And if Nikon is getting the global shutter sensor from Sony. Then there’s gotta be some stipulation. A Z9 with a global shutter would cost the fortune. My guest $10,000. In that case so he might look at as not a competition.
While Nikon has used Sony sensors in the past, it's possible they could collaborate on a global shutter sensor without huge restrictions. If Nikon releases a Z9 with a global shutter, it could be pricey, but it would still compete with Sony in the high-end market, offering unique advantages for professionals who need that technology.
@@nelsonclub7722 Nikon’s interest in Red Cameras likely reflects a strategic move to enhance their own video capabilities, not just a simple acquisition for the sake of it.
😂 there is no Z9H. Never had been likely never will be. Nothing bout an unfounded rumor to get clicks from over almost a year ago. The EXPEED 9 processor won't be introduced until the Z9II and that won't be till the end of 2025 or more likely sometime in 2026
While the Z9H may just be a rumor, speculating about future releases is common in tech communities. As for the EXPEED 9 processor, official announcements will provide clarity, and it's best to wait for Nikon's timeline rather than rely on rumors.
@@TechTraveller01 there isn't even an 3XPEED 8 processor yet. Your comments are even more comical. You're just making up sync stuff. So you even have a clue if what you're taking about?
Nikon’s success was well-established long before Sony entered the camera market, with a legacy rooted in pioneering optical technology since 1917. The Nikon Z series, including the Z9, showcases Nikon’s own innovation, proving its achievements are independent of Sony’s influence.
As of now, there hasn't been any official announcement regarding a Nikon Z9h. We'll need to wait for Nikon to release details or confirm if this model is in development.
While the Sony A9 III uses a fast stacked CMOS sensor that minimizes rolling shutter, it doesn't feature a true global shutter. A camera like the rumored Nikon Z9h with a global shutter would completely eliminate rolling shutter effects, offering superior performance for fast-action photography and video.
@@TechTraveller01the A9 III does have a global shutter sensor. The A1 and previous iterations of the A9 have a stacked sensor with fast-enough-for-most readout speeds. The a9 III is why a global shutter sensor rumor exists for Nikon in the first place. And it wonbe a gamechanger. We have been quite able to freeze the motion of a sprinter using strobes for several decades, this just offers more control over ambient light. We actually had global shutter back in the days of CCD sensors, it just wasn't utilized much other than as a means to allow the use of cheaper mechanical shutters.
@@perkristoffersson4153 While the A9 III's features are impressive, global shutter technology isn’t a magic solution; it has its own limitations and won't necessarily revolutionize every shooting scenario.
@@perkristoffersson4153 While the A9 III's global shutter is indeed a notable feature, it’s important to recognize that the overall performance of a camera depends on many factors, including sensor technology and processing capabilities. Moreover, global shutter technology can have its drawbacks, such as increased noise levels and complexity in design, which means it may not be the universal game changer some expect
@@TechTraveller01 indeed. It is worth noting that the A9 III displays about one stop more noise at moderate ISO's. This is why the industry moved away from CCD sensors in the first place. It is also worth noting that we have been happy with rolling shutter artefacts for ages as that is what one gets with every mechanical shutter beyond the x-sync speed. So the importance and impact of global shutter is highly overrated as far as stills photography is concerned
"made by" is not the same as "same as". LG makes LCD panels for most TV's, Samsung provided displays for lots of cell phones, etc. Happens in the food industry, too. Each engineering team provides software and other hardware to their specs, and Sony will manufacturer to a client's specs.
Everyone's is but Canon. Not they make the basic sensor not Nikon does the own thing to it. That's why it's faster then Sony's sensor at 3.72ms and the A1 is 3.98ms.
While Sony does manufacture many sensors used in Nikon cameras, Nikon customizes and optimizes these sensors for their specific models. So while Sony plays a part, Nikon's sensor performance also relies on their own engineering and image processing.
@@eric00214 You're right that many manufacturers, except Canon, use Sony sensors as a base. However, Nikon adds its own processing and tuning to optimize performance. That's why Nikon cameras can achieve faster readout speeds, like the 3.72ms you're mentioning, compared to Sony's A1 at 3.98ms. It’s a combination of hardware and custom optimization.
There hasn't been an official announcement about the Nikon Z7III yet, but it's common for rumors to circulate. Nikon tends to release updates in different sequences, so we'll have to wait for official news.
Es cierto que utiliza un sensor Sony, pero eso no define completamente la calidad o las características de la cámara. Hay muchos factores en el diseño y la implementación que afectan el rendimiento general.
Sony “only” manufacturers the sensors for Nikon because they (Sony) has the investment in the machinery and can make them more economically than if Nikon or others started their manufacturing sensor line. What needs to be known is that Nikon owns the patent on the design of the sensors. So it doesn’t matter that Sony makes them.😊
@@jburroughs6645 Nikon also has the upper hand in ergonomics. Sony could 100% give space to a right side screen to check parameters without draining battery by using the main screens, and place the mode dial on the left. Also, making hybrid frames (metal and plastic) is much more complicated than all metal frames.
Reminds me of that song from Annie Get Your Gun ... whatever Nikon can do Sony can do better (and usually first - i.e. A1 MKII). And in a body half the size!
While Sony has a reputation for innovation, especially with models like the A1 MKII, Nikon's Z9 brings unique features like its robust build and advanced autofocus. Each brand has its strengths, and the choice often depends on personal preferences and shooting needs.
@@mainmain5303 While Sony may lead in introducing new technology, Nikon often excels in ergonomics, color science, and user experience. Both brands have their strengths, and what works best depends on the individual photographer's needs.
@@TechTraveller01 So why the clickbait title? Seems most Nikon users can't be satisfied with their camera of choice unless they're bagging some other brand ... usually Sony.
Yes, Nikon does use Sony sensors, but they also implement their own engineering and processing techniques to enhance performance. It's a collaboration that combines strengths from both companies.
@@ricc00000 While some photographers criticize Sony's color science, others find it offers a unique look that can be appealing. Ultimately, color preference is subjective, and Nikon's color rendering has its own strengths that resonate with different users.
It's understandable to have strong opinions on camera performance, but every brand has its unique strengths and weaknesses. It's all about finding what works best for your specific needs and preferences.
I understand that you might feel that way, but everyone has different experiences and preferences when it comes to gear. It's worth considering all perspectives before forming a conclusion.
The Z8 has received positive reviews for its performance and features, but it's understandable that not every model meets everyone's expectations. The Z9 aims to address various user concerns, so hopefully, it will be a better fit for those looking for improvements.
@@paulalbrecht2161 The Z8 is indeed an excellent camera, but the rumored Z9h could take things even further with potential upgrades like a global shutter, improved speed, and enhanced features for demanding professional use in sports, wildlife, and press photography.
Can`t stand these videos with AI voice, stock footage image and Zero real information
The AI man says "Nikon has already introduced the Expeed 8 processor in some of their models." Really?! Uh, no, that’s total BS crap from an AI voice with older clips copied from several other channels. A lot of other sheer speculation. Also, the Z9 & Z8 already have sensor readout speeds of just under 0.4 milliseconds and the claim here is that this will be new the super-fast readout on the updated Z9. That’s just plain stupid. And anything that doesn’t have a readout speed of zero is not a global shutter. Also Nikon can be pronounced two ways but never is it 'nee-kon'. Wow, I have to wonder who the 4.85K subscribers actually are that think channels like this are even remotely legit. I’m a Nikon user and love to hear good things that will be coming from Nikon soon but this is just complete nonsense.
The claims about Nikon's Expeed 8 processor and super-fast sensor readout are inaccurate and speculative, with misinformation from unreliable AI sources. Nikon's Z9 and Z8 already have fast sensor readout speeds, and the pronunciation debate is unnecessary. Such channels lack credibility despite their follower count.
I don't know why you say 'nee-kon' is wrong. Nikon is a Japanese company, and 'nee-kon' is close to the correct pronunciation of Nikon in japan.
"Also, the Z9 & Z8 already have sensor readout speeds of just under 0.4 milliseconds."
Actually it's 4.2 milliseconds. I guess we're dealing with fake AI videos and fake AI commenters. By all means, carry on...lol.
@@gocannon0 Both pronunciations can be considered acceptable depending on regional accents, but "nigh-kon" is more common outside Japan, while "nee-kon" aligns more closely with the original Japanese.
@@RobertFalconer1967 The sensor readout speed for the Nikon Z9 and Z8 is indeed around 4.2 milliseconds. However, there's no need to jump to conclusions about fake information-errors in specs can happen, but it's always best to double-check the facts.
How this AI BS channel gets more views than other real human channels is crazy. viewers really need to ban and cancel AI channels. Say no to AI bs faceless channles.
I Really Like your Comment, AI channels offer unique content that many viewers enjoy, which is why they attract a larger audience. Rather than banning them, it's about letting viewers decide what they prefer, whether it's AI-generated or human-made content. There's room for both to coexist.
If it’s built, the Z9H would be the true D6 replacement that Press, sports and wildlife photographers require. 20.5mp is more then enough for those applications.
While 20.5MP might be enough for many sports, press, and wildlife photographers, a higher resolution like what the rumored Z9h could offer would provide more flexibility for cropping and capturing fine details. A true D6 replacement would also need to go beyond just resolution, offering features like faster performance, improved autofocus, and potentially a global shutter for even better action shots.
@@TechTraveller01 What would actually be nice is to be higher resolution but have a Small Raw...
@@kytoober5137 Higher resolution combined with a Small RAW option would indeed offer flexibility, allowing photographers to capture detailed shots while saving space when needed. Many recent cameras do offer such options, giving the best of both worlds for quality and file management.
Rumors only. Nikon over the years has relied on Sony for sensors. And if Nikon is getting the global shutter sensor from Sony. Then there’s gotta be some stipulation. A Z9 with a global shutter would cost the fortune. My guest $10,000. In that case so he might look at as not a competition.
While Nikon has used Sony sensors in the past, it's possible they could collaborate on a global shutter sensor without huge restrictions. If Nikon releases a Z9 with a global shutter, it could be pricey, but it would still compete with Sony in the high-end market, offering unique advantages for professionals who need that technology.
Nikon bought Red Cameras for a reason
@@nelsonclub7722 Nikon’s interest in Red Cameras likely reflects a strategic move to enhance their own video capabilities, not just a simple acquisition for the sake of it.
😂 there is no Z9H. Never had been likely never will be. Nothing bout an unfounded rumor to get clicks from over almost a year ago.
The EXPEED 9 processor won't be introduced until the Z9II and that won't be till the end of 2025 or more likely sometime in 2026
While the Z9H may just be a rumor, speculating about future releases is common in tech communities. As for the EXPEED 9 processor, official announcements will provide clarity, and it's best to wait for Nikon's timeline rather than rely on rumors.
@@TechTraveller01 there isn't even an 3XPEED 8 processor yet. Your comments are even more comical. You're just making up sync stuff. So you even have a clue if what you're taking about?
@@eric00214 Nikon's latest models use the Expeed 7 processor , Upcoming Will Be Expeed 8
Nikon's success was started by Sony
Nikon’s success was well-established long before Sony entered the camera market, with a legacy rooted in pioneering optical technology since 1917. The Nikon Z series, including the Z9, showcases Nikon’s own innovation, proving its achievements are independent of Sony’s influence.
when available
As of now, there hasn't been any official announcement regarding a Nikon Z9h. We'll need to wait for Nikon to release details or confirm if this model is in development.
Game changer? Isn't there already a Sony A9 III with global shutter?
While the Sony A9 III uses a fast stacked CMOS sensor that minimizes rolling shutter, it doesn't feature a true global shutter. A camera like the rumored Nikon Z9h with a global shutter would completely eliminate rolling shutter effects, offering superior performance for fast-action photography and video.
@@TechTraveller01the A9 III does have a global shutter sensor. The A1 and previous iterations of the A9 have a stacked sensor with fast-enough-for-most readout speeds. The a9 III is why a global shutter sensor rumor exists for Nikon in the first place. And it wonbe a gamechanger. We have been quite able to freeze the motion of a sprinter using strobes for several decades, this just offers more control over ambient light. We actually had global shutter back in the days of CCD sensors, it just wasn't utilized much other than as a means to allow the use of cheaper mechanical shutters.
@@perkristoffersson4153 While the A9 III's features are impressive, global shutter technology isn’t a magic solution; it has its own limitations and won't necessarily revolutionize every shooting scenario.
@@perkristoffersson4153 While the A9 III's global shutter is indeed a notable feature, it’s important to recognize that the overall performance of a camera depends on many factors, including sensor technology and processing capabilities. Moreover, global shutter technology can have its drawbacks, such as increased noise levels and complexity in design, which means it may not be the universal game changer some expect
@@TechTraveller01 indeed. It is worth noting that the A9 III displays about one stop more noise at moderate ISO's. This is why the industry moved away from CCD sensors in the first place. It is also worth noting that we have been happy with rolling shutter artefacts for ages as that is what one gets with every mechanical shutter beyond the x-sync speed. So the importance and impact of global shutter is highly overrated as far as stills photography is concerned
Nikon’s Senses are made by Sony 😊
"made by" is not the same as "same as". LG makes LCD panels for most TV's, Samsung provided displays for lots of cell phones, etc. Happens in the food industry, too. Each engineering team provides software and other hardware to their specs, and Sony will manufacturer to a client's specs.
Everyone's is but Canon. Not they make the basic sensor not Nikon does the own thing to it. That's why it's faster then Sony's sensor at 3.72ms and the A1 is 3.98ms.
While Sony does manufacture many sensors used in Nikon cameras, Nikon customizes and optimizes these sensors for their specific models. So while Sony plays a part, Nikon's sensor performance also relies on their own engineering and image processing.
@@eric00214 You're right that many manufacturers, except Canon, use Sony sensors as a base. However, Nikon adds its own processing and tuning to optimize performance. That's why Nikon cameras can achieve faster readout speeds, like the 3.72ms you're mentioning, compared to Sony's A1 at 3.98ms. It’s a combination of hardware and custom optimization.
My understanding is that Nikon has stopped using Sony's sensors, but I honestly don't know.
I thought z7iii coming first
There hasn't been an official announcement about the Nikon Z7III yet, but it's common for rumors to circulate. Nikon tends to release updates in different sequences, so we'll have to wait for official news.
Infomercial.
Thank You
Recuerde que usa sensor Sony..
Es cierto que utiliza un sensor Sony, pero eso no define completamente la calidad o las características de la cámara. Hay muchos factores en el diseño y la implementación que afectan el rendimiento general.
pero tiene la ergonomía y resistencia que ninguna cámara Sony ha tenido, tiene y probablemente nunca tendrá.
Sony “only” manufacturers the sensors for Nikon because they (Sony) has the investment in the machinery and can make them more economically than if Nikon or others started their manufacturing sensor line. What needs to be known is that Nikon owns the patent on the design of the sensors. So it doesn’t matter that Sony makes them.😊
Yes Sony sensors but tweaked by Nikon engineers!
@@jburroughs6645 Nikon also has the upper hand in ergonomics. Sony could 100% give space to a right side screen to check parameters without draining battery by using the main screens, and place the mode dial on the left. Also, making hybrid frames (metal and plastic) is much more complicated than all metal frames.
Nonsense, a good eye, not another camera...false needs
Reminds me of that song from Annie Get Your Gun ... whatever Nikon can do Sony can do better (and usually first - i.e. A1 MKII). And in a body half the size!
The reality Sony comes first, Nikon does better.
While Sony has a reputation for innovation, especially with models like the A1 MKII, Nikon's Z9 brings unique features like its robust build and advanced autofocus. Each brand has its strengths, and the choice often depends on personal preferences and shooting needs.
@@mainmain5303 While Sony may lead in introducing new technology, Nikon often excels in ergonomics, color science, and user experience. Both brands have their strengths, and what works best depends on the individual photographer's needs.
Half the size with the accompanying overheating issue in hot climates.
@@TechTraveller01 So why the clickbait title? Seems most Nikon users can't be satisfied with their camera of choice unless they're bagging some other brand ... usually Sony.
NIKON is using SONY Sensors! 😉
But Sony Color was so “horrible “ brother
Yes, Nikon does use Sony sensors, but they also implement their own engineering and processing techniques to enhance performance. It's a collaboration that combines strengths from both companies.
@@ricc00000 While some photographers criticize Sony's color science, others find it offers a unique look that can be appealing. Ultimately, color preference is subjective, and Nikon's color rendering has its own strengths that resonate with different users.
and Sony is using Nikon equipment to make the sensors 😂
Sony ist bullsh...t for speed, very bad rolling shutter in all Sonys
Bolony
It's understandable to have strong opinions on camera performance, but every brand has its unique strengths and weaknesses. It's all about finding what works best for your specific needs and preferences.
This Chanel is BS flags immediately !
Lame
I understand that you might feel that way, but everyone has different experiences and preferences when it comes to gear. It's worth considering all perspectives before forming a conclusion.
The Z8 was a piece of junk. Hope this is better.
The Z8 has received positive reviews for its performance and features, but it's understandable that not every model meets everyone's expectations. The Z9 aims to address various user concerns, so hopefully, it will be a better fit for those looking for improvements.
The z8 is absolutely amazing
@@paulalbrecht2161 The Z8 is indeed an excellent camera, but the rumored Z9h could take things even further with potential upgrades like a global shutter, improved speed, and enhanced features for demanding professional use in sports, wildlife, and press photography.