If you would like to ask a question or make a comment about the material presented in this video, please use the contact form at this link: bibletalk.tv/contact/video/Q1z9e12mNqY
Rev 18:24 And in her was found the blood of prophets and saints, and of all the slain upon the earth. Matt 23 describes (scribes, Pharisees)Jerusalem as that city responsible for the blood of the prophets and saints and the righteous starting with Abel, so Babylon in Revelation is not Rome but Jerusalem.
I agree that in Matthew Jesus us referring to Jerusalem, however, the total description given as to the activity and relationship of the city to other cities can only point to Rome. Also, Jerusalem had already been destroyed (70AD) when John wrote Revelation so putting Jerusalem in this context would not make any sense. - MM
Again, I want to express how much I enjoyed your videos. However, Rome is not condemned by Christ in Matt 23 and there is strong evidence Revelation was written before 70AD
Thank you for such clear enlightenment in prophecy
The two witnesses died and rose up 3 days later, and then called up to god.
And all the living creatures died that were living in the sea. How do you translate that sentence?
If you would like to ask a question or make a comment about the material presented in this video, please use the contact form at this link: bibletalk.tv/contact/video/Q1z9e12mNqY
Where are you getting the interpretation? This is confusing me. And I did go through Daniel book and I get that?
Interpretation of what exactly?
- MM
Rev 18:24 And in her was found the blood of prophets and saints, and of all the slain upon the earth. Matt 23 describes (scribes, Pharisees)Jerusalem as that city responsible for the blood of the prophets and saints and the righteous starting with Abel, so Babylon in Revelation is not Rome but Jerusalem.
I agree that in Matthew Jesus us referring to Jerusalem, however, the total description given as to the activity and relationship of the city to other cities can only point to Rome. Also, Jerusalem had already been destroyed (70AD) when John wrote Revelation so putting Jerusalem in this context would not make any sense.
- MM
Again, I want to express how much I enjoyed your videos. However, Rome is not condemned by Christ in Matt 23 and there is strong evidence Revelation was written before 70AD