If you would like to ask a question or make a comment about the material presented in this video, please use the contact form at this link: bibletalk.tv/contact/video/sbDEmv_r9WI
8:06 the criteria stipulated for Apostleship, by Mike's choice of wording and phrasing, would disqualify Paul from being, an Apostle given Paul only came into contact with the risen Lord, and was certainly not with Christ at his Baptism. Knowing Mike to be usually on the mark with his hermenautics, this is possibly just a semantic oversight by the Canadian brother, rather than preaching a heretical doctrine.
If you would like to ask a question or make a comment about the material presented in this video, please use the contact form at this link: bibletalk.tv/contact/video/sbDEmv_r9WI
8:06 the criteria stipulated for Apostleship, by Mike's choice of wording and phrasing, would disqualify Paul from being, an Apostle given Paul only came into contact with the risen Lord, and was certainly not with Christ at his Baptism.
Knowing Mike to be usually on the mark with his hermenautics, this is possibly just a semantic oversight by the Canadian brother, rather than preaching a heretical doctrine.
At 8:09 he specifies he was talking about, "one of the 12 Apostles". So, isn't he correct since Paul wasn't one of the original 12?