Episode

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 тра 2024
  • Philosophize This! Clips: / @philosophizethisclips
    Get more:
    Website: www.philosophizethis.org/
    Patreon: / philosophizethis
    Find the podcast:
    Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/2Shpxw7...
    RSS: www.philosophizethis.libsyn.org/
    Be social:
    Twitter: / iamstephenwest
    Instagram: / philosophizethispodcast
    TikTok: / philosophizethispodcast
    Facebook: / philosophizethisshow
    Thank you for making the show possible. 🙂 Today we tell a story from the history of philosophy in an attempt to prepare us for understanding the Phenomenology of Sartre.
    www.patreon.com/philosophizethis
    www.philosophizethis.org
    Thank you for wanting to know more today than you did yesterday. :)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 24

  • @TheKalazar
    @TheKalazar 7 років тому +26

    Holy moly this episode was good. Thank you, again, for teaching me so much. I might need to re watch all the videos and take notes.

  • @dru4670
    @dru4670 3 роки тому +2

    I love your comedy bits 😂😂. I leave for them. I love those Kant's.

  • @Sui_Generis0
    @Sui_Generis0 7 місяців тому

    What a funny start

  • @silverfoxcondor46
    @silverfoxcondor46 7 років тому +1

    This lesson has helped to get a foothold on the existential movement. Outlining the role of the Natural attitude was very well done. Thanks!

  • @mattfacchino3999
    @mattfacchino3999 5 років тому +7

    You never go full natural attitude

  • @FD-ci9me
    @FD-ci9me 5 років тому

    Reading up on Camus gave me this sense of clarity you're talking about in the beginning.. Listening to you say that getting to know thinkers' views help you, actually helps me more. Thank you

  • @ebmpinyuri
    @ebmpinyuri 6 років тому +2

    I love this episode as it follows from dualism of facticity and transcendental outcomes .... But if living in bad faith is a inauthentic effort ,then what is true way to live in action ?

  • @dirkwyse1609
    @dirkwyse1609 Рік тому

    "Bill Nye the Guy" 😂

  • @mahfuzurrahmansazal3974
    @mahfuzurrahmansazal3974 4 роки тому +2

    Bill Nye the guy. You know, I like it.

  • @smallwienerbrothers6016
    @smallwienerbrothers6016 7 років тому +2

    thank you very much

  • @clickityclackity75
    @clickityclackity75 Рік тому

    Today’s “televangelical scientists” like Bill Nye and, Neil Tyson, are just that ! They are all on “team religion is bunk and this replaces it!” Also, I’m shocked to learn that they haven’t explored philosophy! That is terrifying to me !!! “I also use too many exclamation points!” Lol! Anyway, totally love this show ! I’ll be heading over to his Patreon soon !!!! 🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻

  • @indigoali5612
    @indigoali5612 3 роки тому

    The one thing about the first thing you said, if you are not willing to open yourself up to the philosophy of the past, it means nothing to you, it takes you making the choice to listen to boring podcasts and read boring books to learn about what these thinkers said or you will only know what the corporate cultural system wants you to think, and it’s not an ego pursuit if you list your sources

  • @christinemartin63
    @christinemartin63 Рік тому

    So far, so good.

  • @rickygrix8877
    @rickygrix8877 7 років тому +2

    great show

  • @lonelycubicle
    @lonelycubicle Рік тому

    The theoretical physicist Brian Greene recently tweeted that even if time travel to the past was possible, one could not alter past events for a reason I can’t remember, but the point to me was that when respected scientists like Sean Carroll can say there may be a nearly infinite many worlds breaking off with every quantum decision and Leonard Susskind saying it’s possible the Holographic Principle is true where everything is a projection from a 2D surface … if these are possibilities, how can anyone make pronouncements like what Brian Greene said was the reason for why past events cannot change … what would it even mean to change a past event if another universe is splitting off constantly? At a minimum, before making speculative statements like that, they should have to say what assumptions about the universe they are making. But as the creator of this video said, it’s seems that scientists, especially physicists, have take on a near religious role these days.

  • @slartibartfast2977
    @slartibartfast2977 3 роки тому

    22:15 looking at you Ham Sarris

  • @limitless1692
    @limitless1692 5 років тому +1

    Ok it is official
    My brain is fried
    BZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz

  • @joessonguf
    @joessonguf Рік тому

    😊🥰

  • @keeganmccorry4952
    @keeganmccorry4952 4 роки тому

    “What if we are consciousness?” “What if consciousness and the world are one?” How is this different from monism? From Buddhism? From Daoism?

  • @HopyHop1
    @HopyHop1 4 роки тому

    @ 15:09 Get a real job Kant!
    I wonder if they had real money in Kant's day or if they create it out of nothing when someone takes out a mortgage, car loan, student loan, swipes a credit card ... like they do today. We essentially live in a caste system where people who have the privilege of seigniorage are the rulers and those who become the enemy of law enforcement if they create money out of nothing are the slaves. This may result in many people spending most of their waking hours in "real jobs", complete with all the sadomasochism that is deemed "normal", they can barely tolerate.

  • @rayneweber7636
    @rayneweber7636 5 років тому

    What's a twitter?

  • @makeshiftaltruist7530
    @makeshiftaltruist7530 6 років тому +1

    Bill Nye the SJW Guy