A Tour of Damage Control Central on Battleship NJ

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 118

  • @BattleshipNewJersey
    @BattleshipNewJersey  Місяць тому +8

    Get $5 off your next order through my link sponsr.is/magicspoon_battleship_0924 or use code BATTLESHIP at checkout, or look for Magic Spoon on Amazon and in your nearest grocery store!

  • @BalshazzarWastebasket
    @BalshazzarWastebasket Місяць тому +34

    the ryan szimanski curator standard has been adopted fleet wide when assessing volume vs. number of people.

  • @Joseph55220
    @Joseph55220 Місяць тому +58

    As you mention, a lot of things on a carrier is massively scaled up (at least in terms of physical volume) than on a BB or smaller ship. That includes not just the spaces in the ship, but also the likely size of a fire or a flood. Carriers with their huge aviation fuel tanks and hangars just have the inherent potential for a casualty to grow from a localized situation to a stem-to-stern situation in the metaphorical blink of an eye. BBs have a tremendous amount of internal compartmentalization and redundancy that simply isn't practical for a carrier. So, your damage control central serves more to funnel information about potential damage up the chain of command so informed decisions can be made quickly. On a carrier, I imagine that space also serves as a meeting place to organize large damage control parties to go potential battle a major hangar fire. On BB-62, you can sort of let the local damage control parties do what they've drilled to do if you take battle damage. On Midway, you might need to get whatever 300-400 uninjured bodies you can find suited up to go to war against a 2,000 degree inferno the likes of which you just aren't going to see on NJ.

    • @ParanoidMarvinMk2
      @ParanoidMarvinMk2 Місяць тому +9

      45 thousand tons of relatively lightly armoured spaces stuffed with planes, tanks, pumps, etc. is not the same as 45 thousand tons where huge portions of that are solid steel.

    • @KennethStone
      @KennethStone Місяць тому +4

      Makes me think of the flare fire on the carrier USS Oriskany in '66. Killed a bunch of sailors before damage control could even get up and running.

  • @markbabcock977
    @markbabcock977 Місяць тому +4

    A great video as usual. All the equipment in DC central looks just like it was installed last week, so obviously this space is expertly maintained. The only damaged item in DC central is the speaker just to the left of the status boards. I found an undamaged speaker for that unit at a surplus supplier, so if you should ever want to change out the speaker, let me know.

  • @arichigdon5365
    @arichigdon5365 Місяць тому +16

    I have a few questions?
    1. If the order was given to flood the 16” magazine, how long would it take to flood the compartment.
    2. Would the crew in the compartment be given any time to evacuate?
    3. Has that order been given on any US Navy ships for any magazine space? 16”, 5”?
    Thanks.

    • @SomeRandomHuman717
      @SomeRandomHuman717 Місяць тому

      There seems to be an idea that the magazine fire suppression systems in Iowa class ships can deliver water like the passageway scenes during the sinking in the movie Titanic. ua-cam.com/video/yUFHbA1HTmY/v-deo.htmlsi=AjH2NlfotkQF_RYN&t=48
      The reality is that they are sprinkling systems that spray water.
      ua-cam.com/video/dKSbBniw3_w/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/ZYWcF5TiQrM/v-deo.html&t
      Reviewing the details of Iowa's Turret 2 open breech explosion on April 19, 1989 will answer many of your questions. Suggested sources:
      ua-cam.com/video/QCTwQG1_06Y/v-deo.html&pp=ygUadXNzIGlvd2EgdHVycmV0IGV4cGxvc2lvbiA%3D
      ua-cam.com/video/derlR2hx_Zk/v-deo.html&pp=ygUadXNzIGlvd2EgdHVycmV0IGV4cGxvc2lvbiA%3D
      ua-cam.com/video/4Tq6jSwGzHk/v-deo.html&pp=ygUadXNzIGlvd2EgdHVycmV0IGV4cGxvc2lvbiA%3D
      www.amazon.com/Glimpse-Hell-Explosion-Iowa-Cover-Up/dp/0393047148/ref=sr_1_1?
      www.amazon.com/Explosion-Aboard-Iowa-Richard-Schwoebel/dp/1557508100/ref=sr_1_1?

    • @ryanstuckey8677
      @ryanstuckey8677 Місяць тому +2

      1 not sure i've found different answers to that.
      2 depends on the situation. if there is a risk of the magazine exploding and destroying the ship then no they seal it and flood as fast as possible (see iowa turret fire) they immediately flooded it
      3 yes iowa did it

    • @SomeRandomHuman717
      @SomeRandomHuman717 Місяць тому

      I replied to your question with four references but it seems the moderators thought that was inappropriate and removed the comment. Oh well.

  • @uncleronstrixie
    @uncleronstrixie Місяць тому +1

    I spent a lot of time in DCC onboard the USS New Jersey, that was our watch as an HT, always manned and a sound and security rover to report back continuously. Very important for the ship’s integrity.
    Great Memories,
    Thanks

  • @BAshcraft1966
    @BAshcraft1966 Місяць тому +5

    I was a Plotter in DC Central onboard USS Lexington (AVT-16) from 1988 to decommission. Very interesting job. Very intense.

  • @EDKguy
    @EDKguy Місяць тому +23

    Ryan, if you get milk in that analog computer, that repair will come out of your allowance and you will be grounded this weekend. 😂

  • @elliotdepriest4937
    @elliotdepriest4937 Місяць тому +15

    Ryan, I was aboard NJ i believe the week before you guys got ready for dry dock...sometime in February, awesome time! Question is is can you guys do a video on your Security team "Museum security" "Red Shirts" and what they do, plus some situations they had to deal with. Think it'd be pretty cool. Plus, as weird as it sounds...another video on the the heads...the ones the enlisted used...officers etc. Last one was actually quite interesting.

  • @pdoherty
    @pdoherty Місяць тому +2

    Good episode Ryan. Keep up your good work. I served aboard Midway CVA-41 in 1972. Glad you got a chance to go aboard.

  • @PembrokeAcre
    @PembrokeAcre Місяць тому +6

    I'd love to see a video on how the Iowa class ships handled waste management, both human and general waste. I'm guessing that at the time of construction it was just all dumped overboard, but would love to learn more about how all of that was managed.

    • @brandongouge
      @brandongouge Місяць тому +2

      I know they relied on incinerators for much of the solid waste. I’m sure the human waste went straight out unless they were in port.

    • @uncleronstrixie
      @uncleronstrixie Місяць тому +1

      @@PembrokeAcre yes, waste water and human waste all was directed to CHT (collection holding & transfer) tanks, then pumped overboard once in international waters and diverted to onshore sewage dockside.
      I’ve actually been inside all of them on the NJ doing routine maintenance and repairs.

  • @stephenharper4440
    @stephenharper4440 Місяць тому +1

    Thanks!

  • @dennisbabb3493
    @dennisbabb3493 Місяць тому +2

    Ha, your talking about the one time Jersey took a hit from an NK artillery piece then dropped a full broadside on the mountain they were positioned on... the escorting destroyer radio edge back to New Jersey "temper, temper"

  • @garywagner2466
    @garywagner2466 Місяць тому +1

    Excellent video, as usual. Can’t imagine 23 sailors in that space under battle station conditions. Must have been miserably hot and humid, not to mention smelly.

  • @timholmes7913
    @timholmes7913 Місяць тому +1

    Nicely done Ryan - -good and informative video -- love to see lots more like this

  • @TomHill-xh7ec
    @TomHill-xh7ec Місяць тому +4

    I did a self-guided tour of USS Iowa today, so I've got 2 of 4 Iowas done. New bucket list item: tour all four and NJ will be my last, since I was born in the state.

  • @unstoppableevan2699
    @unstoppableevan2699 Місяць тому +1

    I think it’s the best thing how you measure in curators on the channel! I guess it’s probably the one of the inside jokes of the Battleship New Jersey channel!

  • @dalesql2969
    @dalesql2969 Місяць тому +4

    Oil king and water king. What they did and how they did it. You have showed some of their tools in the various engineering space tours. the importance of staying properly ballasted for the armor belt.

  • @bartnickerson4467
    @bartnickerson4467 Місяць тому +2

    Glad to hear that you toured the Midway. They had excellent curation (IMHO) on all aspects of their museum. What did you think of it and any inspired improvements for NJ? I still remember their discussion of deck uniform colors which related to deck responsibilities. Could you compare the 2 ship types - oil, aviation gas, and somehow total explosives aboard?

  • @georgew.5639
    @georgew.5639 Місяць тому +2

    I can only imagine what the damage control activity was like during the fires aboard the Enterprise and the Forrestal aircraft carriers.

  • @leftyo9589
    @leftyo9589 Місяць тому +9

    that switchboard isnt called a switchboard. it is an ICSM alarm panel.

  • @johntorrey9510
    @johntorrey9510 Місяць тому +1

    On USS Enterprise (CVN-65) Damage Control Central shared the space with Engineering Central Control, which controlled all the propulsion plants (except for shaft RPMs, which came from the bridge), including the electrical distribution system. Central Control coordinated stuff like cross connecting steam plants so that when a plant went down all four main engines could still operate. Central Control also coordinated synch of the SSTG's and such. What performed the Central Control function on NJ?

  • @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
    @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 Місяць тому +2

    I swear if Ryan was in WW 2 they think he was some sort of super soldier with how tall he is, but real its crazy how some of these rooms are,

  • @KJAkk
    @KJAkk Місяць тому +5

    I wonder what South Dakota's DC central plates looked like at Guadalcanal?

    • @tcpratt1660
      @tcpratt1660 Місяць тому +4

      If the after action report from USS South Dakota has been declassified, and is available, I'm sure that the DC Central plates could be recreated more or less in real time in some sort of re-enactment...
      ...the more entertaining DC plate reenactment I want to see from Guadalcanal (Drachinifel and Ryan have got to narrate, though!) would be the utter disemboweling and dismemberment of the Kirishima by Admiral Ching Lee and the USS Washington (like the bomber pilot who was off bombing Mogami and/or Mikuma at Midway first said, some USS Washington CPO gunner's mate probably screamed at the Kirishima, "Tojo, you'll not get your laundry this week!" (add your own expletives at home, I want to keep this video monetized!))

  • @999wilf999
    @999wilf999 Місяць тому +1

    While USS Midway is only two years younger than USS New Jersey, those two years consisted of high intensity combat against a near-peer opponent. Possibly one of the reasons for Midway having a much larger damage control room is combat experience from WWII demonstrating the need for it.

  • @arnieweisbrot9959
    @arnieweisbrot9959 Місяць тому +1

    How about a tour of the SIGINT facility and associated antennas and sensors? I know it is just an empty room now, but your interpretation would be interesting. Relatedly, how did the ship deal with classified waste?

  • @johnwalsh4271
    @johnwalsh4271 Місяць тому +3

    Old skivie waver would like a rundown of the signal bridge and visual comms.

  • @bryans4354
    @bryans4354 Місяць тому +1

    More engineering sections please! Maybe a video (or several) where you just go over the deck by deck blueprints and call out each room and what it's for and if you've done a video on it or not, etc?

  • @ryancrazy1
    @ryancrazy1 Місяць тому +5

    Is there any record of of 16" shell being dropped while being loading down into the ship or while on the rails between storage spaces?

  • @ryancrazy1
    @ryancrazy1 Місяць тому +9

    is there anyone you could ask to see if they have any original training footage? If there is any? it would be really cool to see how these areas were manned.

    • @dennisbabb3493
      @dennisbabb3493 Місяць тому +1

      DoD and Navy Deoartment still has all the old training films preserved in archive. Some have been loaded to UA-cam like gunnar and so on. So yes, the films are there they just need to be released by DoD and Department of Navy.

  • @phillipbouchard4197
    @phillipbouchard4197 Місяць тому +1

    Thanks for the video Ryan. I do not believe I have ever seen this space before although I am aware you have done previous video's of it. It is a cramped space as you indicate but seems capable of performing it's main function. I assume you will have a video of your trip to the Midway at some future date and I am looking forward to seeing it.

  • @loosh5101
    @loosh5101 Місяць тому +3

    If it hasn't been done already, is there any chance of a look at the 5" Gun Workshop (02-119-0-Q)? Even in the original configuration it doesn't seem handy to most of the mounts. Even if it doesn't rate a full video maybe it could be folded into a sort of "miscellaneous unsung hero compartments' video.

  • @wallyschmidt4063
    @wallyschmidt4063 Місяць тому

    The big thing is the compartmentalization of the ship to fight fires, floods and other problems. Fires can be isolated, and contained by compartmentalization and fire boundaries (prevent heat from causing other problems). Magazines can be flooded. Electricity can be rerouted. Old ships would use a firemain that was linear, newer ships use a ringmain (both types would have several fire pumps to supply the firemain). Today that would be controlled with automatic valves and automatic pump starts. You would have way more sensors for heat (spaces) and for water damage/flooding.
    You would need to go through an extended battle problem with damage control for people to understand how the system would work. Each class of ship varies it priorities according to what they are trying to accomplish at that moment.
    Float, Move, Fight. Today I would assume the top priority would be to CIWIS (power and cooling) for incoming missiles despite the fact you have a flood and a couple of fires.
    Many systems would have alternate power or 2nd Power for electrical supply if its a critical system, like CIWIS.

  • @dennisfariello4852
    @dennisfariello4852 Місяць тому +1

    I wonder if DCC (Damage Control Central) on the Midway was also combined with the Log Room (Engineering Office) as is the case on some ships? For instance, the Yellowstone (AD-41) had a combined DCC and Log Room, so there were desks for almost all of the Engineering Department officers, plus a receptionist. It was a huge room. On the Hermitage (LSD-34) the Log Room and DCC were separate, with DCC being down in the bowels of the ship. The W.S. Sims (FF-1059) had the Log Room and DCC combined. So maybe it's a newer ship thing? The Herm was commissioned in '56, Sims in '70 and Yellowstone in '80.

  • @FrankBarnwell-xi8my
    @FrankBarnwell-xi8my Місяць тому +4

    I've still the list of items from a dunnage bag, ( sea bag of wood wedges, chunks and a hammer. It got detached and in a pocket, I guess. From USS Spiegel Grove LSD 32

    • @williamriley-le9zo
      @williamriley-le9zo Місяць тому +1

      Wasn't " Chunks " the name of the dog in an old joke? never mind... LOL

  • @jamestorrence9340
    @jamestorrence9340 Місяць тому +2

    How long has it been since you did a video on the Bridge and the Conning Towers? Ryan, I cannot tell you how disappointed I was when you told us how seldom the NJ was actually conned from the conning tower.

  • @KNS1996DFS
    @KNS1996DFS Місяць тому +4

    6:53 Maybe some former crew members would be able to recollect what those tags said, and you could recreate them in mylar or plastic.

    • @KnightRanger38
      @KnightRanger38 Місяць тому +1

      One other possibility is checking what is still legible on the alarm panels of other Iowas. Plus, could there be pictures of that panel early in New Jersey's carrier as a museum?

    • @uncleronstrixie
      @uncleronstrixie Місяць тому +1

      @@KNS1996DFS I might have some of my books and sign off sheets while trying to get my Surface Warfare qualification. They covered every system and although I spent a little of time in DCC, I don’t know what I could recall if any?? I sure would like to visit one of these days!! Great memories

  • @robertkelley3437
    @robertkelley3437 Місяць тому +5

    How many of the alarms are still active or working?

    • @gowdsake7103
      @gowdsake7103 Місяць тому +1

      unless removed most likely most works but switched off

  • @mokdumoknonsharrall1868
    @mokdumoknonsharrall1868 Місяць тому +1

    In general, it seems like during combat, there would be a bunch of guys who didn't have any immediate tasks to do, who would just be sitting around waiting. And I guess hoping they never had to do anything, as would be the case with the DC Central personnel.

    • @uncleronstrixie
      @uncleronstrixie Місяць тому

      @@mokdumoknonsharrall1868
      DCC was served as a watch station in 4 hour blocks.

  • @jackmoorehead2036
    @jackmoorehead2036 Місяць тому +3

    Do a Sick Bay tour for us old Corpsmen.

  • @mokdumoknonsharrall1868
    @mokdumoknonsharrall1868 Місяць тому +1

    For the books of DC plates on the walls: Was there a way they would mark a "page" on the wall with a "bookmark" so that some minor damage or condition wouldn't get overlooked? or would someone just keep flipping through the plates?

  • @JB-hu5jm
    @JB-hu5jm Місяць тому +1

    A video on each fire and turbine room explaining which one is in best conditions.

  • @woodywoodman2319
    @woodywoodman2319 Місяць тому +1

    Can ya make a video about the Fuel and Water Kings? Maybe show where they can ballast/transfer fuel and/or ballast water during battles, to transferring fuel to boilers! Including the Legal records, daily Fuel and Water Report, Draft Report, etc
    Also the Water Kings testing, treatment, of potable And boiler water, feed water and condensate!
    Too include the logs, test and treatment of boiler water/feed water!
    Also testing of lubricating oils!
    Are the Water Fuel and Oil kings all in one office, or are they split up into different spaces?

  • @cmcb7230
    @cmcb7230 Місяць тому +1

    I don’t think you guys have ever shown the aviation facilities, specifically the little aircraft control station above turret 3.

  • @henrycarlson7514
    @henrycarlson7514 Місяць тому +1

    Interesting , Thank You. Si different from U.S.S. Ranger Cv. 61.

  • @MaxTSanches
    @MaxTSanches Місяць тому +2

    Is there a secondary / backup Damage Control Space?

  • @HongyaMa
    @HongyaMa Місяць тому +2

    Magic Spoon spill in curators office, Prepare to abandon ship!
    Sailors man your spoons, Mess deck officers prepare the MILK.
    Marine detail eat your crayons

  • @bradmiller4999
    @bradmiller4999 20 днів тому

    Hey Ryan can you do a video on a what if scenario of one of the Iowa’s sinking? Potential scenarios on damage control, moving ballast, flooding other parts to stabilize, sealing doors or bulkheads. Fighting fires, repair efforts, I think that would be a great video.

  • @c1ph3rpunk
    @c1ph3rpunk Місяць тому +3

    Is “Nautical Curators per Hour” also a legitimate speed metric?

  • @ravenbarsrepairs5594
    @ravenbarsrepairs5594 Місяць тому +9

    I suspect that the battleship has a smaller Damage Control Central(DCC) is that a battleship is much more heavily armored, as it's designed to take hits and keep in the fight, whilst an aircraft carrier is designed to be behind the lines and send it's planes to the battle line, as well as it's purpose of launching and landing planes, and their having a hanger deck below that makes them much less able to take damage without it threatening the ship.
    As to the deteriorated paper labels on the alarm panel, that suprises me. If the Battleship was activated and deactivated to 50yrs. how could paper labels be expected to survive the mothball times? I suspect there is either a better labeled patch panel(allowing each indicator to be set to any alarm, with nothing but by pulling a plug out and putting another in), or else there is somewhere in the ships documentation a diagram showing which alarm is what, so the data can easily be replicated.
    Is there a backup DCC? What happens if DCC gets taken out?

  • @jeredjackson1504
    @jeredjackson1504 Місяць тому +1

    Does a battleship have a designated Ordnance Control station (OC) like a Nimitz carrier?

  • @Lando_P1
    @Lando_P1 Місяць тому

    How secure were those damage control plates kept? I imagine that was information our adversaries would have loved to get ahold of.

  • @dutchman7216
    @dutchman7216 Місяць тому +2

    How about another look at CIC ?

  • @phillipdavis3316
    @phillipdavis3316 Місяць тому +2

    What are the differences with the communication "mcs?"

  • @abrunosON
    @abrunosON Місяць тому

    I would like to know more about the pipe works of the sewer system, the storage of cottons around the ship and how to make peel potatoes for the crew.

  • @shyfarmboya
    @shyfarmboya Місяць тому +5

    Ok if remember right Wisconsin is the only one to receive battle damage. What might that look like in damage control? Lol

    • @tcpratt1660
      @tcpratt1660 Місяць тому +4

      Damage control? Wisconsin needed Temper Control (but her fire control worked rather perfectly!)

    • @SomeRandomHuman717
      @SomeRandomHuman717 Місяць тому +1

      Ryan's done videos on these: Missouri took a glancing blow from a Kamikaze, but IIRC the bomb did not go off. New Jersey suffered her one on-board combat fatality (Seaman Robert Osterwind) and took minor damage to T1's port face plate ladder when the North Korean shore battery hit it. New Jersey also received some crew injuries and minor damage from a friendly fire 5" shell (that thankfully did not explode) fired from another ship doing target practice. It landed in an aft crew head. Off the top of my head I don't recall any videos of Iowa receiving battle damage.

  • @garywayne6083
    @garywayne6083 Місяць тому +1

    Its been a few years since there was a video on the nixie room...

  • @alexwood5425
    @alexwood5425 Місяць тому +1

    Can you do one on the admirals space and what all his mates actually did.

  • @GABABQ2756
    @GABABQ2756 Місяць тому +4

    Repair lockers report the damage to DCC.

  • @ghostdog0002
    @ghostdog0002 Місяць тому +26

    Two curators wide three curators deep we Americans really will use anything but the metric system lmfao!

    • @jasething
      @jasething Місяць тому

      Worse yet ya'll think Glod actually exists....

    • @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
      @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 Місяць тому +1

      Dont worry its coming farmers will need to cut out taxes

    • @davidvavra9113
      @davidvavra9113 Місяць тому +2

      Betcherass

    • @tcpratt1660
      @tcpratt1660 Місяць тому +1

      For metric system purposes, one Black Dragon curator is the official NIST American meter - so take that, centimen!

    • @shocktnc
      @shocktnc Місяць тому +3

      ​@@jasethingwho is glod?

  • @mrkeiths48
    @mrkeiths48 Місяць тому +9

    Ain't no 9 1 1 in the middle of the Sea Of Japan.........

    • @slowery43
      @slowery43 Місяць тому +2

      gee thanks Cpt Obvious

  • @larryhopper4228
    @larryhopper4228 Місяць тому

    You mentioned repair lockers, have you ever showed one on the channel, if not could you show one.

    • @stevecooper2873
      @stevecooper2873 Місяць тому

      Nearly certain I have seen one he has done on DC lockers.

  • @CreatureOTNight
    @CreatureOTNight Місяць тому +1

    So was damage control maned 24/7 365 or was it only maned while in combat?

    • @trevdestroyer8209
      @trevdestroyer8209 Місяць тому

      It was always someone there the ship being on fire or sinking doesn't just happen in combat

    • @uncleronstrixie
      @uncleronstrixie Місяць тому

      @@CreatureOTNight manned 24/7 one man stayed in DCC and there was a rover running a sound and security watch reporting back to DCC. The rover was safety, fire watch, check points, pump rooms, etc.. took soundings of the tanks and voids measuring depths of fluids, all part of the ships ballast

  • @kennethhummel4409
    @kennethhummel4409 Місяць тому +1

    How about a tour of the goat lockers?

  • @douglasmiller1467
    @douglasmiller1467 Місяць тому +1

    DCC wasn't much bigger on the Connie if memory serves.

  • @Desert-edDave
    @Desert-edDave Місяць тому +1

    lol @ 0:19

  • @randycarter2001
    @randycarter2001 Місяць тому +1

    I spent 3 years aboard CV-41.

  • @GtSmAction
    @GtSmAction Місяць тому +1

    Get any good Mexican food in my hometown while you were here?

  • @wfoj2
    @wfoj2 Місяць тому +2

    The intro went silent !?!?!

  • @divarachelenvy
    @divarachelenvy Місяць тому

    I would love to know what part of the ship you would like to activate if you could?

  • @s.kammerer1206
    @s.kammerer1206 Місяць тому +1

    main space eng. control room and or elec eng control room

  • @gowdsake7103
    @gowdsake7103 Місяць тому +1

    Hated damage control
    The RN has a very realistic damage control simulator

  • @aliasunknown7476
    @aliasunknown7476 Місяць тому +1

    I could tell by way you ate that cereal that you don't eat cereal.

  • @madhungarian3024
    @madhungarian3024 Місяць тому

    I'm not much into infomercials. I generally kill the video immediately and move onto something better.
    But surely you can find a better sponsor than that! I couldn't figure out if this was a joke or not.
    How about DeWalt or Milwaukee maybe, selling power sanders and drills? Or a sump-pump company?

  • @CompTechMike
    @CompTechMike Місяць тому +1

    Magic Spoon? Lol. When did they add ads to these videos? 😆

    • @garywagner2466
      @garywagner2466 Місяць тому +1

      What’s funny about it? The videos help support the very expensive restoration work. I bet you don’t click ‘like’ and have not subscribed, either. Another passenger.

    • @JoshuaTootell
      @JoshuaTootell Місяць тому

      They have had ads for years now.

    • @CompTechMike
      @CompTechMike Місяць тому +1

      @@garywagner2466 what's "funny" about it? Because it's Ryan acting a goof for a weird cereal named "Magic Spoon". It's obviously meant to be humorous and "tongue-in-cheek", but thanks for the rude reply, jackass.

  • @BalshazzarWastebasket
    @BalshazzarWastebasket Місяць тому +1

    usually in these videos , if you study a certain rom on the ship we see a lot of photos of how it was used in the past. but i guess if someone with a camera ever tried getting into damage control during drills or action, they would have to push against so many curator-sized crew that they would just give up, that is assuming that the damage control officer would allow such a grave breach of protocol.

  • @JeffBilkins
    @JeffBilkins Місяць тому

    What is the most useless space on the ship that was still critical to have at the time?

  • @peterkwolek2265
    @peterkwolek2265 Місяць тому +1

    I like how you made yourself a unit of measurement.

    • @Joseph55220
      @Joseph55220 Місяць тому +3

      I believe NIST defines 1 curator as 1.8014686 meters, for reference

    • @wfoj2
      @wfoj2 Місяць тому

      come back often- it is a standard

  • @hazzmatte
    @hazzmatte Місяць тому

    Hahaha that commercial kills me!

  • @bigsarge2085
    @bigsarge2085 Місяць тому +1

  • @JDHitchman
    @JDHitchman Місяць тому +3

    No offence but that "Magic Spoon" cereal is terrible! It was literally like eating shredded cardboard.

    • @garywagner2466
      @garywagner2466 Місяць тому

      So don’t eat it. See how easy that was?

  • @phill2009c6
    @phill2009c6 Місяць тому +1

    I pay for premium coz l don't want adds loose the sponsored adds with in the production. Poo to the video and subscription 👎

  • @merlinwizard1000
    @merlinwizard1000 Місяць тому

    1st, 25 September 2024