STEEL vs ALUMINUM vs TITANIUM Connecting Rods

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 тра 2024
  • What is up engineheads! Today we are going to look at the differences between steel, aluminum (or aluminium if you will) and titanium connecting rods, and we are going to see which one of these is best for your engine build.
    Let's start with good old common steel. Steel is a great material, it's strong and it's plentiful and has been the material of choice for connecting rods for many many decades.
    Steel rods can be cast, forged or billet. Cast ones are ok for stock applications, but are usually a bad idea if you're interested in significantly increasing the power and torque output of your engine.
    Forged rods offer a superior grain structure within the metal, which becomes far more coherent thanks to the large pressures exerted on the rod during the forging process.
    Billet steel rods start out by having their rough shape cut out from a plate of forged steel and then finish machined on a CNC machine. Billet rods don't have the surface degradation that occurs during forging, which means a fully machined billet rod has the same kind of material with the same carbon content and quality both in it's core and on its surface, making billet rods better at resisting the formation of cracks.
    The majority of steel connecting rods found in OEM applications use steels from the 51XX series, so stuff like 5130 or 5140. When it comes to aftermarket forged connecting rods you will typically see the 4340 alloy, which in addition to having a high carbon content also has other elements (nickel and molybdenum) which make it a superior connecting rod material.
    Steel has a tensile strength of approximately 200.000 psi and excellent fatigue life, the material doesn't get tired unless you push it to it's yielding point.
    Now let's take a detailed look at aluminum connecting rods. We know that aluminum is a much weaker material than steel. While high carbon steel typically has a tensile strength of around 200.00 psi, aluminum only manages around 95.000 psi. So why in heaven's name would you put something that's twice as weak inside an engine and expose it to all the extreme loads of engine operation? Because aluminum is a lot lighter than steel! And when it comes to performance engines light is right! The lighter the rotating assembly of your engine - the better!
    Aluminum rods also have the ability to act as shock absorbers. Because they sort of give in a bit to the peak loads present in an engine, they help absorb these loads and transfer less of the stress onto your bearings and crankshaft. But there's a price to be paid for all the benefits. Aluminum has a much shorter fatigue life compared to steel and engines with aluminum rods must be warmed slowly and fully before you can beat on them, and once you beat on them you have to let them cool of a bit.
    Something else you need to consider when installing aluminum rods into your engine is clearance. Sometimes they don't clear stuff in your crankcase, like girdles or the bases of the cylinders, and you need to adapt these to suit the rods.
    And now for exotic guy in the bunch! Titanium. Many describe titanium as an incredibly strong material, often stating that it is stronger than steel. This is a bit misleading. The reality is that titanium is impressively strong compared to it's density. Titanium is significantly less dense than steel while maintaining comparable strength which means it's lighter than steel but with pretty similar strength. This is why titanium rods don't need to be thick like aluminum rods. In fact titanium rods will usually look similar to steel rods.
    Aluminum rods are typically machined out from billets of high quality aluminum alloys and are rarely forged. When it comes to titanium the opposite is true because the forging process greatly benefits titanium and helps increase it's strength. Titanium is less dense and it also has smaller grains compared to steel, so the forging process does a lot to help improve the grain flow and increase the strength of titanium.
    The downside is that titanium rods are prohibitively expensive and that's not jut because the alloy itself is expensive but because titanium is very difficult to machine.
    Titanium is also very susceptible to galling, or friction welding but the galling issue has been largely solved with coatings such as chromium nitride or titanium nitride which is why you can find titanium rods in mass production vehicles like the Honda (Acura) NSX or the Corvette Z06 with the LS7 engine. By the way, the first ever application of titanium rods in a production vehicle was Honda's amazing RC30 motorcycle. Titanium is also very notch sensitive so you have to be careful not to scratch titanium rods when handling them.
    A special thank you to my patrons:
    Daniel
    Peter Della Flora
    Daniel Morgan
    D4A merch: teespring.com/en-GB/d4a-merch
    Patreon: / d4a
    #d4a #enginebootcamp #rods
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @d4a
    @d4a  3 роки тому +43

    Let's hang out: superpeer.com/driving4answers
    Support d4a: driving-4-answers-shop.fourthwall.com/
    Forged steel rods Subaru: amzn.to/2Eb8LoP
    AEM wideband AFR gauge: bit.ly/D4Axserieswb
    AEM ECU: bit.ly/D4Ainfinity5
    D4A merch: teespring.com/en-GB/d4a-merch
    Patreon: www.patreon.com/d4a

    • @trumanhw
      @trumanhw 3 роки тому

      EXCELLENT info. I would expect this to be commercial it's so good. Truly. EXCELLENT. Hopefully you get editors who can assist coupling the meat of the content (info) with equivalent video ... Keep it up.
      Think New Mind ua-cam.com/channels/5_Y-BKzq1uW_2rexWkUzlA.html
      PS:
      Wouild shot peening billet rods make up for that ..?
      What about doing a final pass of forged rods used on billet ..?

    • @phantomwalker8251
      @phantomwalker8251 3 роки тому

      powdered metal rods,7.3 diesel ford.

    • @jlo13800
      @jlo13800 3 роки тому

      Titanium rods in a honda 2 stroke!

    • @Ramp10er
      @Ramp10er 3 роки тому

      I hope you included fiber glass in your video...

    • @williammaxwell8703
      @williammaxwell8703 3 роки тому

      @@Ramp10er 0

  • @curtaustin8119
    @curtaustin8119 3 роки тому +667

    I'm a PhD metallurgist who worked in the jet engine business. You'll hear a lot of nonsense about materials in popular media, but this video was excellent! I especially liked hearing the rarely spoken truth about "billet" parts - better than cast, not as good as forged.

    • @JohnDoe-ji5wg
      @JohnDoe-ji5wg 3 роки тому +6

      Would the best parts be a combination? For the connecting rods, for example, forge the bottom end and machine the rest of it.

    • @mpetersen6
      @mpetersen6 3 роки тому +13

      I share your pain. I used to work as a Tool Marker and later i worked for a company that builds centrifuges for waste treatment plants. The number of times i heard people expouse that stainless steel is some kind of wonder material. They think if they use stainless screws they are much stronger.

    • @davidelliott5843
      @davidelliott5843 3 роки тому +12

      I wonder if the single crystal casting process used for gas turbine blades would add value for connecting rods.

    • @mpetersen6
      @mpetersen6 3 роки тому +12

      @@davidelliott5843
      Possibly, but I question the cost effectiveness. In a production vehicle the currently used scintered and forged rods are perfectly serviceable for threat use. The rod is actually larger when it comes out of the sintering process and when forged ir reduces the volume and increases the density. Another option might be 3D printing using laser sintering of metal powders. This would actually allow the use of two different alloys. Hard and tough on the outside while softer on the inside. People are already doing 3D printer non load bearing components such as intake manifolds. Just how long before we see aftermarket aluminum 3D printed heads and blocks. These would still require a certain amount of machining but IMO would be cost effective in comparision to billet. I suspect that the engine manufacturers are already doing this. Originally 3D printing allowed for rapid production of patterns for casting prototype parts*.
      *One of the early 3D printing or stereo lithography techniques used paper rolled out on a platen with a laser cutting out the cross section. Glue on the next layer and tra e the cross section. Rinse and repeat until done. This technique is still around to some degree. There is a company in Ireland that was showing a desktop 3D printer that was combined with an inkjet. The idea is to produce fully colored and finished items
      newatlas.com/mcor-iris-paper-3d-printer/32903/

    • @curtaustin8119
      @curtaustin8119 3 роки тому +11

      The strongest component in a jet engine is probably the low pressure shaft - a maraging steel, forged. Temperature capability probably OK. Specific strength (accounting for density) is probably highest for Ti-6242 or GE's alloy Ti-17. The single crystal turbine blades are for very high temperature - at that temperature (2000F/1100C) they have ultimate strengths of around 40ksi. At 1400F/760C and below, but above the limits of titanium, a nickel alloy called 718 is best.
      But there are design factors that matter - is there room for a low density alloy? Do vibration modes change in the wrong direction with density and modulus changes? And many, many more. Straying from experience is risky, and gets you scrutiny from the Chief Engineer.

  • @Hydrazine1000
    @Hydrazine1000 3 роки тому +878

    Materials scientist / metallurgist here. You did a good job at explaining usefulness for the different alloys! You made one mistake though: When comparing steel against aluminium and titanium, for the application of connecting rods, you have to compare the yield strength of the material, not the tensile strength. The yield strength is the load per unit of area (be that psi or ksi, or MPa) where the material starts to deform permanently. Often you see a value for "0,2% yield strenght", which is the load where your piece will have been loaded so that, after release, it has permanently deformed by 0,2%. Tensile strength (ultimate tensile strength) is the highest load the material can take before it breaks/fails/snaps, which is typically quite a bit higher than the yield stress.
    So in the application of a connecting rod, you have to avoid getting stretched or bend rods, so the 0,2% yield strength is the value to compare, not the ultimate tensile strength. You don't need to know when it *breaks* but you do need to know the point where it would *start to deform permanently* .
    With regard to the shock absorbing capabilities, what you need to look at is the Young's modulus, or modulus of elasticity. It basically describes the "springiness" of a material in the load range *below* where it gets to deform permanently. Typical steel E-modulus is around 190 GPa (27500 ksi) where Ti-alloys are around 115 GPa (17000 ksi) and your average aluminum/aluminium sits around 70-80 GPa (11000 ksi'ish). So aluminium is indeed acting like a softer spring compared to steel.
    Minor detail: galling and fretting are not the same thing. Galling is local cold welding during direct metal-to-metal contact, where the formed weld is stronger than the base material so a tiny part gets ripped out of the counter part, which then causes more damage. Fretting is a form of wear where the sliding distance is really really small (micrometer or mils scale) such as when you have parts in vibrating contact.

    • @balancebreaker1561
      @balancebreaker1561 3 роки тому +76

      good shit

    • @currentbatches6205
      @currentbatches6205 3 роки тому +24

      Thank you.

    • @Hydrazine1000
      @Hydrazine1000 3 роки тому +60

      @Chris Farley HAH! First time ever that I get to see "gangster shit" as description of Materials Science 101. But thank you all the same.

    • @insanebmxthomas
      @insanebmxthomas 3 роки тому +18

      @@Hydrazine1000 Just out of curiousity what kind of education/path did you take for learning that? It always interested me but it's probably way out of my league. Great read, thanks!

    • @Hydrazine1000
      @Hydrazine1000 3 роки тому +46

      @@insanebmxthomas I got a MSc in Materials Science & Engineering at Delft Technical University.
      Edited to add: a BSc or MSc in mechanical, civil or aeronautical engineering would also get into the fundamentals of how material behaves, this isn't limited to Materials Science & Engineering.

  • @pabitrikalita3940
    @pabitrikalita3940 3 роки тому +607

    I am studying engineering but this video taught me a lot more than my college, thanks bro

    • @makantahi3731
      @makantahi3731 3 роки тому +36

      request money back

    • @guidoheeling1179
      @guidoheeling1179 3 роки тому +20

      even automitive will not teach you this, engineering is just getting to know a bit from a million different technical cases. I study engineering myself and every case is basically enough to calculate with but not enough to be an expert, and i think this stuff is pretty in depth..

    • @scottfisher1065
      @scottfisher1065 3 роки тому +18

      Hmmmm, back when I got my BSME, the basis of this video was covered in school (material properties, particularly steel, aluminum other metals and concrete). Mr. Kaleta either 1) hasn’t yet taken the course that covers this, 2) didn’t pay attention on that day, 3) isn’t studying mechanical, chemical or related fields of engineering (although at my school, even the EEs had an into into this) or 4) needs a better school.

    • @BigUriel
      @BigUriel 3 роки тому +10

      ​@Prophet You do realize that you don't finish a mechanical engineering course in any university worth a damn without first designing mechanical parts right?
      "Engineering" is a bit vague as there are about a gazillion different branches of engineering and you wouldn't expect an electronics engineer to know any of this stuff. But you will learn just about all of this in a mechanical or automotive engineering course. In a materials science course you will learn, far, FAR, *FAR* more than this.

    • @trevortrevortsr2
      @trevortrevortsr2 3 роки тому +13

      I visited a college recently and observed a Level 3 engineering group in a lesson (18-20 yo) - a student asked "What's the difference between stress and strain" the reply alarmed me "There much the same - there's no need to know that" - I learned later the lecturer was being promoted to head of Engineering - I was appalled - it's a fact that many OFSTED inspectors are not themselves competent in the subject they are meant to guarantee standards for.

  • @R0cketRed
    @R0cketRed 3 роки тому +166

    Jesus christ I learn more about metals in this 20min video then a year in weilding school. Once again your the best thx for your hard work benefiting all of us engine/engineering nuts!

    • @sepg5084
      @sepg5084 3 роки тому +1

      you'd learn a lot more if you spend a bit of time googling for knowledge.

    • @JesusSaves86AB
      @JesusSaves86AB 3 роки тому +2

      @@sepg5084 Every masturbator is a know-it-all.

    • @corbingreiner9879
      @corbingreiner9879 3 роки тому +1

      Yea ,machinist class skipped over this like black history month. lol I didn't learn this till I worked in a metallurgical testing lab. I did see an instructor catch titanium on fire. That was fun.

    • @luk4s56
      @luk4s56 3 роки тому

      yep only things i lernt in school were durning practical works and internship xD

    • @slappy8941
      @slappy8941 3 роки тому

      Too bad you didn't learn English in school, either.

  • @gregculverwell
    @gregculverwell 3 роки тому +108

    I can attest to titanium being 'difficult' years ago I was a partner in an engineering company, specialising in heat exchanger components for the petrochemical industry.
    We were approached by a customer who had tried to manufacture tube sheets from titanium and failed.
    I quoted the job @ 4x what we would ask for stainless steel + a big oops factor and very nearly came short. Eventually though we worked out how to do it and it became the most profitable job we ever did.
    I would describe is as trying to machine abrasive toffee to fine tolerances.

    • @ShaunHensley
      @ShaunHensley 3 роки тому +4

      What’s the secret?

    • @BastardX13
      @BastardX13 3 роки тому +14

      Heard that a whole new machining industry to be able to machine titanium for the Sr71. Looked like a pain in the backside. Way to engineer your way to success!

    • @magpieblue
      @magpieblue 3 роки тому +5

      Anyone else looking forward to the abrasive toffee connecting rods video?

    • @magpieblue
      @magpieblue 3 роки тому +1

      Jim Kimpton the Real Engineering has a couple of great videos about this... search their channel for “SR-71” or “titanium” if you haven’t seen those already

    • @zedsdead7670
      @zedsdead7670 3 роки тому +7

      In my section of the shop we don't machine titanium but from what I've heard about it I wouldn't like machining it.
      Titanium work hardens like nothing else, thus peck drilling is a no go, if speeds and feeds ain't perfect along with a regular supply of inserts as to have fresh tips you're going to have a bad time.
      Albeit the other side of the factory says doing chromed induction hardened steel like my side does is far worse, 62-65 HRC 10-50 thou deep. I do hate them ceramic inserts but as long as you rotate and change them out per so many parts you're usually good.

  • @jonathonwilliams93
    @jonathonwilliams93 3 роки тому +29

    Didn't see pressure cast rods mentioned, well worth a mention as a lot of manufacturers used them in the transition period from mass market cast to forged rods. Manufacturers such as Saab and Suzuki were known for using this process.

    • @mattb892
      @mattb892 3 місяці тому

      As a Saab car guy, I haven't heard of that. Are you sure it was Saab?

  • @MrHammond85
    @MrHammond85 3 роки тому +26

    This is without a doubt the best explanation anyone could ask for. Huge appreciation for the work you put into this video

  • @lauraiss1027
    @lauraiss1027 3 роки тому +46

    Next time I sell a car and someone points any issues, I'll come back with "But as a bonus, it has steel rods. Let me explain why".

  • @spynles7947
    @spynles7947 3 роки тому +8

    One of the only channels you can hit 'like' before actually watching the video, and the most informative, and entertaining automotive channel on UA-cam, in my opinion anyway.

  • @filipbrecelj669
    @filipbrecelj669 3 роки тому +31

    Valve seats, valve guides and valves themselves. Types of which(shapes) and what materials are used for them would be a nice topic for the next video.

  • @LarryLeaders
    @LarryLeaders 3 роки тому +15

    Just want to say how much i respect your video quality and in depth explanations. Ive been trying to learn about cars specifically hondas and your k series motor break downs were awesome !

  • @randalljames1
    @randalljames1 2 роки тому +4

    main point of forged aluminum is the shock adsorber effect.. in our top level engines (12,000hp in 500CID) we run the rods until they shrink (get shorter) by our magic number.. This video is pretty spot on .. not sure where he got his info but it is really good... Now the work being done on carbon fibre rods.....

  • @yeahboy67
    @yeahboy67 3 роки тому +7

    As always, great and clear explanations on the subject. I love the way you manage to condense important parts of the "scientific" aspect of a topic into something a car enthusiast without an engineering degree can understand.
    Your videos give a good overview of what matters which enables me to quite easily dive deeper in the subject by my own. Just the simple fact that now I know which words to Google thanks to your vids is very helpful and helped me to gather quite good knowledge and understanding of particular subjects.
    Keep up the good work!

  • @linchester8464
    @linchester8464 3 роки тому +69

    Interesting info. Didnt know forged steel will still be the best of all applications.
    Your video saved us a lot of money if we just blindly choose the 'best' material for rods.

    • @sepg5084
      @sepg5084 3 роки тому +10

      not all applications. drag racers use aluminum and F1 cars use titanium. low budget performance and non-performance use-cases use steel.

    • @MassageWithKlay
      @MassageWithKlay 3 роки тому +9

      @@sepg5084 so basically if you're not going to be pulling apart your engine every time you push it hard, just use steel, otherwise .. if you do use what ever you want .. although have a nice big chunky bank account backing you up :D

    • @JACKOFALLFATES
      @JACKOFALLFATES 3 роки тому +4

      @@sepg5084 i dont know a single drag racer here that use aluminum rods. all of us use 4340.. and some of us go 10s. maybe in the 7s it "matters", but only because they can not make the motor spin with fuel. they need rotating assembly savings to bracket race. which is lame IMO. if you run a 7.9 who TF cares its still a 7. competition can drain these dudes pockets.. im not gonna complain :P

    • @corvetteZ3r
      @corvetteZ3r Рік тому

      Titanium FTW

  • @briandurning7789
    @briandurning7789 3 роки тому +22

    Does anyone else have brain fluid leaking after watching his videos? So informative and entertaining, I accidentally learned something.

  • @robertdavis6708
    @robertdavis6708 3 роки тому +3

    Best explanation on connecting rod history I've ever seen. What a great job Sir! Thanks for the lessons.

  • @JC-gw3yo
    @JC-gw3yo 2 роки тому +3

    I'm an old piston head and you have done a great job of summing up on connecting rod and there materials...Job well done

  • @tepidtuna7450
    @tepidtuna7450 3 роки тому +17

    I love the concept of Titanium in everything. Such a great metal.
    However for rods, sigh, I can live with the cost, and selecting a good set of forged rods rather billet. But ! The galling and notching issues versus the now minimal weight offset leaves me thinking forged steel for now until someone comes up with a better Ti alloy.
    Great content.

    • @electric7487
      @electric7487 2 роки тому +7

      Titanium rods are normally 25-35% lighter than steel, so that's a big difference. Today's coatings also have very high impact resistance, so galling and notching are far less problematic than non-coated rods. Not sure about the fatigue life though.

  • @kde5fan737
    @kde5fan737 Рік тому +1

    LOVE your video's & I'm so glad I found your channel! You do a great job explaining things in a very clear, easy to follow & understand manner. I appreciate the level of depth you go into subjects without going too deep into "unnecessary" areas. Keep up the great work & I hope your channel continues to grow!

  • @andyc5612
    @andyc5612 3 роки тому +8

    Man your vids are just the best. Excellent info, entertaining, well presented, easy to understand. Keep up the awesome work.

  • @ghoulbuster1
    @ghoulbuster1 3 роки тому +127

    Steel really is a wonderful material, isn't it?

    • @Lozzie74
      @Lozzie74 3 роки тому

      Scientist Walter didn’t stick around for the other two?

    • @TranceFur
      @TranceFur 3 роки тому +29

      Pretty sure he did. All things considered, forged steel is still the best material to use for con-rods, except for some very niche applications.

    • @michaelvann1934
      @michaelvann1934 3 роки тому +8

      Honestly, unless you are looking to find the last 10 percent of engine output, steel is the best for your rotating assembly

    • @MaloneMantooth
      @MaloneMantooth 3 роки тому +3

      @Chris Farley: Titanium is too brittle material and flexes alot with heat and movement, I'd expect the same with aluminum. Nice name by the way.

    • @MaloneMantooth
      @MaloneMantooth 3 роки тому +1

      @@michaelvann1934: I don't work with steel ever, I work with alot of Titanium and Cobalt. Is there a specific type of steel that works best? or at such low rpm's it doesn't matter at that point, I mean I'm talking about a non high performance engine.

  • @60NXNP09
    @60NXNP09 3 роки тому +4

    I've learned a lot of metallurgy knowledge from you thanks!!

  • @Four_Eyes
    @Four_Eyes 3 роки тому +1

    You put a lot research into this video and it's definitely appreciated. Excellent content.

  • @johnashtoor4574
    @johnashtoor4574 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much bro this clears up a lot of confusion I had a bout the materials

  • @matinirudolph8420
    @matinirudolph8420 3 роки тому +8

    I actually learned something!!! This was engineering explained done properly

  • @maxcactus7
    @maxcactus7 3 роки тому +7

    You pack so much useful information into each video and make it all clearly, easily understandable. Great job, love your channel!!

  • @windywaz
    @windywaz 3 роки тому +1

    Very clear explanations for the pros/cons of each material.

  • @Davidautofull
    @Davidautofull 3 роки тому +2

    you sir, are an excellent orator. great enunciation and flow. perfect to impart information understandably.

  • @farmerdude3578
    @farmerdude3578 3 роки тому +9

    I found a old brass rod on my farm when I tore down a barn. Pretty cool looking . Probably from some old tractor.

  • @ghshrksidhc5460
    @ghshrksidhc5460 3 роки тому +5

    I am immeasurably happy that I found this channel.

  • @randydewees7338
    @randydewees7338 3 роки тому

    Just fantastic (and entertaining).Very accurate and precise explanations - my favorite is where you distinguished density from weight

  • @levihammond1991
    @levihammond1991 3 роки тому +2

    Man i love your videos they are so in detail in such a compact time..
    Worth every second

  • @mikeeaton9822
    @mikeeaton9822 3 роки тому +8

    I'm 52 years old and I thought I was pretty knowledgeable about performance components of engines, I have been wrong, you have given me an education about engine performance internals. Thanks

  • @trevortrevortsr2
    @trevortrevortsr2 3 роки тому +10

    In the early 70;s I heard of a Matchless G50 fitted with an early Titanium rod - it worked great for a season however the following season it snapped - I inquired why and was told it "Age Hardens"

    • @ABaumstumpf
      @ABaumstumpf 3 роки тому +2

      Depends on the alloy and should be taken into consideration when designing the dimensions.

    • @DavieJones_Lockr
      @DavieJones_Lockr 3 роки тому +2

      my father says they fabricated titanium rods in the 70s for some of the BMW race bikes and they only got it to work once they put an aluminum cap on it to help absorb the harmonic distortions that would fracture the titanium. tiny little rods with massive caps lol

    • @LordMekanicus
      @LordMekanicus 3 роки тому +2

      A&P here who can attest to titanium age hardening. Some of our rivets had to be kept in the freezer to keep them from hardening. You only had about twenty minutes to drive them or they would crack. On the other side of the coin, the titanium alloys used in turbines last thousands of hours without fail. Wouldn't use it for connecting rods unless absolutely necessary. Even small aircraft piston engines still use I or H beam forged steel rods for longevity.

  • @IraChandler
    @IraChandler 3 роки тому +1

    EXCELLENT presentation. Great script, good pace, and very informative.

  • @martin042068
    @martin042068 3 роки тому +1

    Amazing video! Subscribed! I haven't assembled an engine in years, but I really appreciate how you explained things.

  • @markmall7142
    @markmall7142 3 роки тому +8

    This was well presented .Perhaps it could be helpful to tell people as with all materials out there Ti also comes in various grades .

  • @mikebrooka9395
    @mikebrooka9395 3 роки тому +5

    Always wondered what pitfalls titanium rods have. Thanks, I did know about price and machining.

  • @ur1off
    @ur1off 3 роки тому +2

    what a brilliant explaintion; geez for an ESL bloke you explained this better than most could! Well done!

  • @56Seeker
    @56Seeker 3 роки тому

    Beautifully explained, in very clear script and delivery. Thanks.

  • @bicyclist2
    @bicyclist2 3 роки тому +11

    This was very interesting. I learned a lot. I view these materials through a cycling lens. Some people ask what material is best, and I tell them it depends on how you plan on using it. I think the same responce applies here. I've ridden bicycles made out of all of these metals. 6/4 or sometimes 3/2.5 Titanium is much preferred because of its flexibility and resistance to corrosion. 7000 series aluminum is very stiff but has a tendency to crack under repeated stress loads. Aluminum tubes for bicycles are very thin and have a tendency to dent very easily. Thanks.

    • @Surestick88
      @Surestick88 Рік тому +1

      Also a cyclist, worth noting that aluminium isn't really stiffer than ti. The "traditional" oversized tube frames that alu is made into is what gave aluminium its reputation for stiffness.
      Aluminium also isn't a material that handles repeated bending well in the long-term so oversized tubes that are stiffer and don't bend much were a way to create frames that lasted.
      Some of the original aluminium frames by Vitus had thin tubes that were of a similar diameter to traditional steel tubes and were known to be way too flexible.

  • @mzappas
    @mzappas 3 роки тому +5

    Once again! The best car channel on UA-cam! Congrats

  • @zfloz9895
    @zfloz9895 3 роки тому +1

    Congratulations for your documentation and for your production !!!
    And thank you, for taking your time ,to do this !

  • @duytungphammotorvn
    @duytungphammotorvn 3 роки тому +2

    You made me think again about machining a titanium rod for my motorcycle. Very informative

  • @robiulahmed
    @robiulahmed 3 роки тому +4

    Nice one, my friend. Excellent presentation as usual!

  • @misterdeedeedee
    @misterdeedeedee 3 роки тому +12

    great video as always, the only thing i will say is that the vast majority of oem rods are SINTER forged which is entirely different than traditional forging. far and above stronger than cast, but not as strong as a traditional forging. oems have used this process for years now because it is fast and easy and cheap (relatively speaking) and requires very little finish machining. even performance and workhorse engines like the vast majority of gm gen 3/4 and even gen 5 use sinter forged rods with the exceptions being high performance variants such as the ls7 and 9 among others.

    • @corvetteZ3r
      @corvetteZ3r Рік тому

      Well… LS7 and 9 are forged titanium

  • @rickkephartactual7706
    @rickkephartactual7706 3 роки тому +1

    My days of building motors is well past but I still love informative video's like this.

  • @Toblies
    @Toblies Рік тому

    Not really digging into engine parts specifically, but your materials engineering insights are great! Thanks for sharing!

  • @fraymond3
    @fraymond3 3 роки тому +7

    You sir are doing a great job! Your theory is strong and your relaying of info is engaging and well thought out. Thank you for carrying on!

    • @d4a
      @d4a  3 роки тому +3

      Missed seeing that cat avatar of yours. How you doin?

    • @fraymond3
      @fraymond3 3 роки тому +1

      @@d4a that's my cat, Oliver is his name. Doing well. Still working despite this covid stuff. Hope all is well over there. You still working?

  • @zenmotion8162
    @zenmotion8162 3 роки тому +3

    haven't clicked this fast for a while !, awesome content. keep it up

  • @corvetteZ3r
    @corvetteZ3r Рік тому

    Galling happened in my LS7. Glad you covered it

  • @jouleskelvin
    @jouleskelvin 3 роки тому +2

    You're videos are very comprehensive. Nicely done! 👍

  • @williamcricket7931
    @williamcricket7931 3 роки тому +10

    This channel is underrated.

  • @vibhor19781
    @vibhor19781 3 роки тому +4

    I am impressed with not only your knowledge but also the way of representation. keep up the good job.

  • @brianheaton5521
    @brianheaton5521 Рік тому

    Just came across your channel, love it and you make it easy to understand.

  • @supercompooper
    @supercompooper 3 роки тому

    Magnificent delivery. You are a fantastic communicator. I learned more today from you than anything else.

  • @MiscRocketVideos
    @MiscRocketVideos 3 роки тому +5

    I'm not an engine expert, but you pretty much nailed the differences between alloys of steel, aluminum and titanium. Great explanation. Titanium also has pretty low thermal conductivity which can be helpful at times.

    • @johannriedlberger4390
      @johannriedlberger4390 8 місяців тому +2

      This lack of thermal conductivity makes it difficult for machining. I saw tungsten carbide inserts glowing while cooled with emulsion at quite low cutting speeds. With other materials a lot of heat goes in the part and the chips.

  • @samcoote9653
    @samcoote9653 3 роки тому +12

    "Measure me baby" hahaha this was a great video. Never knew titanium was notch sensitive thats very cool. Awesome work as always man :)

  • @christianhenri662
    @christianhenri662 Рік тому

    J’ai appris plein de choses sur le Titane. Bravo bien expliqué,

  • @steynkotze2367
    @steynkotze2367 3 роки тому +1

    Very informative video. Thank you for taking the time to make it.

  • @Skyisnotalimit
    @Skyisnotalimit 3 роки тому +9

    What some just don't seem to understand is a real H beam rod and forged piston may also be a lot lighter than stock units. For me in my Nissan Ca18det engine, i saved over 1hg per unit over stock. What will that be in 9.000rpm!?
    A lot i would say.

  • @markanthony75
    @markanthony75 3 роки тому +5

    This channel deserved a Millions of Subscriber.
    I have zero knowledge about this and the video explanation is very easy to understand.

  • @SassyOnline
    @SassyOnline 3 роки тому

    So educational and so useful. Definitely will be going for forged Steel rods! Subscribed because this was so well explained. Unreal!

  • @gheumann
    @gheumann 3 роки тому

    I think you did an outstanding job hereof explaining the key factors of this subject area.

  • @Drewg351
    @Drewg351 3 роки тому +5

    As a CNC programmer and machinist, I've worked with alot of different alloys and Titanium is a bitch to work with. It's so strange in that it's "gummy", yet tough as hell. Unlike machining steel where you can tell your tool is wearing, with Titanium, the tool fails quickly and usually catastrophically. Luckily alot of newer machines you can set parameters to monitor "load". So as a tool starts to fail, the load on the machine tool motor starts to increase, and if setup properly, the machine will issue an alarm before the tool fails. I must say, a properly machined titanium part is a thing of beauty.

    • @geoffmika
      @geoffmika 2 роки тому

      Some people who machine titanium are using cryogenics to super cool the material and thus able to machine a lot easier. The Russians were the leader in making titanium; machining, fabricating and welding it. Their airplanes and rocket were mostly titanium.

  • @Mr.Beastforpresident
    @Mr.Beastforpresident 3 роки тому +18

    NOTHING beats steel rods and flywheels for long-term reliability. Also you get no Torque-loss.

    • @vladkruglov7719
      @vladkruglov7719 3 роки тому +3

      Forged ftw!

    • @paulsz6194
      @paulsz6194 3 роки тому

      Just gives you a bit of short lived acceleration gains... so driving uphill with a friend in the car means you have to rev harder to maintain your speed.

  • @harryvanhoo7235
    @harryvanhoo7235 3 роки тому +2

    Very nice explanation, very clear and easy to listen. Thank you.

  • @cyberpun2552
    @cyberpun2552 2 роки тому

    Man I love your videos, so easy and to the point, also the graphics and images help a lot,
    This is way better to understand than engineering explained

  • @tayl0rd553
    @tayl0rd553 3 роки тому +6

    This was very informative because I've been looking to have titanium rods installed in my "street" car. I'm more concerned about reducing reciprocating mass than beefing it up for more power. Less moving mass will organically free up more engine power.

    • @testaccount4191
      @testaccount4191 Рік тому +1

      also for motorbikes you can make a huge difference by reducing the reciprocating mass

    • @44R0Ndin
      @44R0Ndin Рік тому

      An additional advantage is that reducing rotating and/or reciprocating mass (of which rods count as both) will potentially reduce shift times, assuming you're using a manual transmission at least.
      Same idea as if you changed to a performance clutch with a smaller diameter and therefore smaller moment of inertia.

    • @corvetteZ3r
      @corvetteZ3r Рік тому

      Do it. LS7’s are magic

  • @BrewPub
    @BrewPub 3 роки тому +5

    Machined forged rods should be the best choice .

  • @davidaxon3587
    @davidaxon3587 3 роки тому

    Clear, precise and entertaining presentation mate. Loved it thanks

  • @frequentlycynical642
    @frequentlycynical642 2 роки тому

    So well articulated. Appreciated this as much as the information.

  • @TheTmshuman
    @TheTmshuman 3 роки тому +5

    Literally have my old LS7 in pieces, sitting in my garage, complete with OE forged Ti rods. Those hypercraptastic pistons just don’t like boost.

    • @areyouundoingthatorwhat9181
      @areyouundoingthatorwhat9181 3 роки тому

      We run some quite high boost on some of our engines,some with the 'hypercraptastic' pistons still fitted,we built a single turbo V6 duratec with around 9.5:1 cr on low-ish 7-9 lbs boost on 70,000 mile factory H/t pistons,expecting a short life,It's had four years of moderate abuse without protest so far and have heard tale of some people running silly boost with them with no issues.I've also seen them broken on na engines,conversely I have seen a few engines using decent aftermarket uprated parts destroyed through poor application of those parts,bad/poor machining tolerances,poor building practise etc.

    • @young11984
      @young11984 3 роки тому

      Haha HT pistons can take plenty boost if the tune is right, ran stock ‘93 5.0 short block, victor jr heads with low/mid 20psi for 3yrs until the cam pin sheared from the cam bolt stretching/harmonics then upgraded everything. And was well over the claimed max 500whp too

  • @mattlowe9913
    @mattlowe9913 3 роки тому +9

    Huge fan of the detailed analysis! You should cover timing belts vs. timing chains.

    • @d4a
      @d4a  3 роки тому +4

      Thanks for the idea!

    • @porterarthur659
      @porterarthur659 3 роки тому +3

      @@d4a also add in there gear drives

    • @mememaster147
      @mememaster147 3 роки тому +1

      @@porterarthur659 Don't forget shaft driven camshafts like the Kawasaki W800

    • @porterarthur659
      @porterarthur659 3 роки тому +1

      @@mememaster147 also the old-school four-cylinder drive shaft gear driven Porsche type 547, 587 and 692 engine

  • @theodoremarakas9899
    @theodoremarakas9899 3 роки тому

    This gentleman made this video so easy to watch and understand. Excellent job.

  • @rixretros
    @rixretros 3 роки тому +1

    Massively informative !!! I can win some bar bets with this info. Well done vid, too. Keep up the great work.

  • @abhishekchaudhary9542
    @abhishekchaudhary9542 3 роки тому +90

    We enthusiasts have only one heart, how many times will you win it?

    • @raft5205
      @raft5205 3 роки тому

      as many as I pick my nose in a day... ;-o

    • @theodoremarakas9899
      @theodoremarakas9899 3 роки тому

      @@raft5205 So many boogers....have you thought about getting a humidifier? LOL Less boogers and no bloody nose. hehehe

    • @raft5205
      @raft5205 3 роки тому

      @@theodoremarakas9899 are you greek? And a fellow biker too?? 😁

    • @theodoremarakas9899
      @theodoremarakas9899 3 роки тому

      @@raft5205 YES on both. That's a great guess, how did you know?

    • @theodoremarakas9899
      @theodoremarakas9899 3 роки тому

      @@raft5205 I have a bunch of bikes, BMW F800, Aprilia Tuono, KTM duke, Moto Guzzi V9, etc.

  • @goosebee
    @goosebee 3 роки тому +11

    U don't even leave one small detail out! Thanks!

  • @tolydukhovny682
    @tolydukhovny682 3 роки тому +1

    excellent presentation, very clear.
    thank you for the video.

  • @denniscoronel2691
    @denniscoronel2691 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the knowledge shared. Learning every time watching your videos

  • @vapor4den
    @vapor4den 3 роки тому +127

    Engineering Explaned should watch is ass 'cause your coming and fast ! :p Great work, very informative

    • @jozsefizsak
      @jozsefizsak 3 роки тому +13

      EE is a fine fellow but now that he's very popular, I find that sometimes he gets careless or even downright absurd. Measuring air filters for engine power with not a word about filtering effectiveness, implying that every filter is very similar in that regard, was one sad example. Mostly though, he's the real deal.

    • @AlessandroGenTLe
      @AlessandroGenTLe 3 роки тому +9

      I actually wrote him on Instagram suggesting to give a look to this channel. They may partner together for something and that would be great. They are different enough not to overlap each other: this channel is more about material and "inner parts" explanations, EE instead is more about overall functionality.

    • @andyc5612
      @andyc5612 3 роки тому +7

      Absolutely I used to watch EE all the time, but this is so much better.

    • @sepg5084
      @sepg5084 3 роки тому +4

      @@jozsefizsak this. the main purpose of a filter is filtration, and he did not test that part.

    • @jozsefizsak
      @jozsefizsak 3 роки тому +2

      @@sepg5084 I would be OK with the video if he had just mentioned that filtering effectiveness is important and differs greatly between brands but there was not a word, unless I missed it.

  • @zzp1
    @zzp1 3 роки тому +1

    Splendid explanation and correct as well!

  • @destructimus
    @destructimus 3 роки тому +2

    Fantastic video. Full of information and straight to the point. My dad was a machinist and he hated titanium.

  • @onebladeprop
    @onebladeprop 3 роки тому +16

    I've been a machinist for over 20 years and most of that time I have been cutting Ti6Al4V. It's honestly pretty nice to machine. Granted you have to use the right tooling and you can't tear through it like aluminum. But it is far better to work with than 316lvm or cobalt chrome.

    • @ObservationofLimits
      @ObservationofLimits 3 роки тому +1

      Congratulations? You machine one of the most common Ti alloys ever....

    • @gigizack
      @gigizack 3 роки тому +2

      I've been told nickel-chrome alloys (Inconel) are very difficult too

  • @deusexaethera
    @deusexaethera 2 роки тому +40

    15:30 - Slight correction: You can't use RAW titanium in any application where metal parts are sliding against each other. Titanium that is coated with titanium nitride (gold-colored), aluminum-titanium nitride (deep purple colored), titanium carbo-nitride (grey colored), or diamond-like carbon (shiny black colored) can be used in sliding applications with no risk of damage. And technically raw titanium can also be used in sliding applications as long as it's lubricated with extra-fancy oil and the load isn't too high, but obviously that doesn't apply inside a car engine. *EDIT: Nevermind, you eventually explained the coatings.*

    • @liammiddleton3064
      @liammiddleton3064 2 роки тому

      How long do the coatings last on titanium

    • @pec1739
      @pec1739 Рік тому +1

      @@liammiddleton3064 those coatings are done on some wicked drill bits, i guess its not too bad

    • @VeritasEtAequitas
      @VeritasEtAequitas Рік тому +1

      Yeah, titanium has an exceptionally high friction like silver, doesn't it? I forget the technical term. There's also a different for some materials between friction of like materials and dissimilar.

    • @benjaminmcintosh857
      @benjaminmcintosh857 Рік тому

      @@liammiddleton3064 I presume that they're effectively indefinite since there's no sliding contact with the rod surface

    • @liammiddleton3064
      @liammiddleton3064 Рік тому

      @@benjaminmcintosh857 i have no idea

  • @Garage35Racing
    @Garage35Racing 3 роки тому

    Awesome video, thanks for taking the time to make it. You earned a new subscriber.

  • @TheSirrandal
    @TheSirrandal 3 роки тому +2

    love the way he Explains the Pros and Cons

  • @andersonsalome4468
    @andersonsalome4468 3 роки тому +5

    I was going to sleep but now i want steel forged rods in my engine.

    • @dwayneevans683
      @dwayneevans683 3 роки тому

      If your running a NA engine you dont need them, only forced air engines can take advantage of them, so dont waste your time and money!

  • @Skyliner04s
    @Skyliner04s 3 роки тому +5

    Dat chart at the end though! XD

  • @robertjohnson4784
    @robertjohnson4784 3 роки тому +1

    Wow I must say my friend awesome video on explaining the manufacturing process and material content on connecting rods 2 thumbs up keep the videos rolling I'm always watching

  • @briandady9030
    @briandady9030 3 роки тому +1

    Great video, extremely informative, very well layed out!

  • @LionWithTheLamb
    @LionWithTheLamb 3 роки тому +6

    The GM powdered metal rods are decent as well. They are good to 500 HP.

    • @mrobinson4210
      @mrobinson4210 3 роки тому +1

      That’s an understatement. Many people reliably get 800+ from the stock sintered rods

    • @jlo13800
      @jlo13800 3 роки тому

      roller beearing engines oil injected.

  • @pokemonmasterbab
    @pokemonmasterbab 3 роки тому +23

    An episode of OHV(pushrod) vs. DOHC or SOHC would be cool

    • @jlo13800
      @jlo13800 3 роки тому

      What about 2 stroke?www.4btswaps.com/attachments/2cyclesbc-jpg.6839/, im not a 4 joke person!

    • @bicyclist2
      @bicyclist2 3 роки тому

      Agreed. I'm a big fan of overhead camshafts.

    • @yzScott
      @yzScott 3 роки тому

      @@bicyclist2 But with modern head designs, pushrod v-8s can get 100 hp per liter NA. But the OHV "weapon" has always been about putting a lot of displacement into a small and lightweight package (rather than maximizing volumetric efficiency). Now that they're not giving up so much on the specific output front, they make a tremendous amount of HP for the mass and volume of the total package.
      I am running an 8.2 liter (502ci) LS. It's pretty giggle-inducing way of producing ~800 crank HP. It's always in the right gear. It only weights 550 lbs including flywheel and clutch.
      I've loved a lot of 4-valve motors over the years, but none of them deliver power in such an easy to use manner as something that makes its power through greater displacement.

    • @yzScott
      @yzScott 3 роки тому

      All that said, if other packaging considerations demand an inline or horizontally opposed motor, DOHC all the way. But judging by UA-cam, an LS will fit in anything.

    • @pokemonmasterbab
      @pokemonmasterbab 3 роки тому

      @@yzScott I feel like DOHC could do better though for peak power. OHV seem to only benefit larger displacements (FCA hemis, Chevy's LS) because the lack of cam manipulation (cam profiles, etc.) as an effect has the car draw out more power throughout the range since they lack an "economic" or "less agressive" camshaft profile and all (ex: vtec, vvti, vanos,etc.) and are stuck on a medium-aggresive lobe, whereas DOHC or SOHC has mutiple levels. You can see how in Coyote people complain it lacks low end -- probably has an economic "first" lobe I would think, whereas the Camaro SS with OHV seems to have a much more meaty powerband. They both make identical peak power though, even though the LS has like 1.4L or some amount more in displacement.

  • @chrisantoniou4366
    @chrisantoniou4366 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent presentation. Complete and comprehensible.

  • @jayceecombs6887
    @jayceecombs6887 Рік тому +1

    Another excellent video on this application use for rods. This guy is real good at what he produces in his (2) videos that I have seen thus far! Thank you, J

  • @springford9511
    @springford9511 3 роки тому +5

    This is good stuff. The Tubes are full of all kinds of mediocrity but this seems all Gold. I'll be back.
    Exactly zero bullshit.

  • @connorharris1629
    @connorharris1629 3 роки тому +4

    Holy shit that’s my camaro at 10:30ish. Had a bad start then missed 3rd lol. Got lucky the blue car red lit haha.

  • @MajMoto
    @MajMoto Рік тому

    Another great video. I don't know if you cover fluid dynamics but I would seriously enjoy a video on torque converters. The depth at which you cover rotating assemblies coupled with the still and animated visuals really aids in a deeper understanding.

  • @luigipasta9496
    @luigipasta9496 2 місяці тому

    I have learned so much with your videos.. this is a master class!!