Y1 38) Supply Side Policies (Interventionist and Market Based) - With Evaluation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 117

  • @finlaygregory6633
    @finlaygregory6633 Рік тому +443

    Bros a literal supply side policy for education

    • @olafgustav6810
      @olafgustav6810 Рік тому +3

      He isn’t a policy buddy

    • @nupurpria3602
      @nupurpria3602 Рік тому +20

      Well for eco students he is coz they come here to be productive and increase their knowledge capacity so he is in a way policy 😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @dolphiner1376
      @dolphiner1376 9 місяців тому

      I needed a good non bias kinda view to form an opinion

    • @opsgreen5216
      @opsgreen5216 8 місяців тому +5

      the word literal suggests that this is a normative statement and so is biased

  • @krishkodali1841
    @krishkodali1841 2 роки тому +219

    Ive watched around 8 hours of your videos today and I still feel like hour one, ready to go and excited to learn. I appreciate you Dal!

    • @gregg6077
      @gregg6077 2 роки тому +109

      did you not reach negative marginal utility

    • @krishkodali1841
      @krishkodali1841 2 роки тому +124

      @@gregg6077 the utility of dal's videos is forever maximized my friend

    • @master4755
      @master4755 2 роки тому +35

      @@krishkodali1841 law of increasing marginal utility :)

    • @saaromessi4343
      @saaromessi4343 2 роки тому +6

      Awee Krish u cutie pie

    • @krishkodali1841
      @krishkodali1841 2 роки тому +2

      @@saaromessi4343 Saar❤️😍🤩

  • @Ezphi
    @Ezphi 2 роки тому +351

    bro is a living legend

    • @master4755
      @master4755 2 роки тому +4

      i cancelled the like to keep it at 69 :D

  • @МаксимР-я1у
    @МаксимР-я1у Рік тому +12

    thank you man, just because of you I have passed my exams. I managed to not study at all then watch your videos and become homo economicus god. Love you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @MarkQub
    @MarkQub 2 роки тому +14

    your videos are absolutely LEGENDARY

  • @rahimshahzad2431
    @rahimshahzad2431 2 роки тому +7

    Living legend saving our asses

  • @ric6383
    @ric6383 2 роки тому +5

    Well done EconplusDal.

  • @abubakkkaridrees9603
    @abubakkkaridrees9603 8 місяців тому +2

    You are literally a gem!

  • @tomh383
    @tomh383 2 роки тому +15

    Econdaddy 👑

  • @Josh-ud1vr
    @Josh-ud1vr 2 роки тому +19

    Bro is just writing essays for us

  • @jakepeto2496
    @jakepeto2496 2 роки тому +4

    loving the new outro mate

  • @Eskushow
    @Eskushow 4 місяці тому +1

    Amazingly with those 10:36 second explained very well ..............and I learn so much out of it . Thank you

  • @embrey7021
    @embrey7021 2 роки тому +6

    Also you can evaluate whether deflation will occur in the economy if you have used that as a advantage of an SSP. For example with interventionist SSP's AD will increase due to rising government spending therefore meaning the LRAS shift will not cause deflation

  • @nelsonwang9706
    @nelsonwang9706 Рік тому +5

    Thank you so much!! Saved my exam lol

  • @BritishRifleman
    @BritishRifleman 2 роки тому +29

    How does someone dislike this?

    • @umarhc
      @umarhc 2 роки тому +6

      they don't

  • @naomihepworth1642
    @naomihepworth1642 2 роки тому +4

    Brilliant vid. Shocked by the terminology ‘negative stakeholder impacts’ 😱😱😱😱
    Distressing for someone who has studied more psychology than economics!
    I’d have gone with ‘human cost’ at least.
    So we’ll explained tho.

    • @sitkhaa
      @sitkhaa Рік тому +7

      Stakeholder also includes the government, producers and other economic agents which is why they're all summarized as "stakeholders". It's not meant to be derogatory

  • @LiLBunny69
    @LiLBunny69 10 місяців тому +3

    dedicating whatever grade i get (hopefully good) to him😎

  • @ea1766
    @ea1766 2 роки тому +7

    My bro 💪🏾

  • @janenelisafreitas6071
    @janenelisafreitas6071 2 роки тому +2

    You are brilliant

  • @tvatv1530
    @tvatv1530 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you

  • @polace9843
    @polace9843 2 роки тому +6

    coldd 🥶

  • @alvinlam7998
    @alvinlam7998 2 роки тому +3

    amazing stuff

  • @memetaldemir1205
    @memetaldemir1205 2 роки тому +2

    big up dal uno

  • @kevingyamfi3246
    @kevingyamfi3246 2 роки тому +3

    Dal the king

  • @user-jx8xf2pk5c
    @user-jx8xf2pk5c 5 місяців тому

    Could you do a video on supply-side policies and the macroeconomic objectives? Your videos are amazing. Thanks so much!

  • @thedogsaidmiaw_123
    @thedogsaidmiaw_123 Рік тому +1

    thank u i love you

  • @ahmedabdi9950
    @ahmedabdi9950 2 роки тому +3

    Legend!!

  • @timbo8262
    @timbo8262 2 роки тому +9

    Loving the content man, Great help, Legend. One question though, at the start of the video about achieving macro economic objectives, if long term rates of inflation decrease resulting in a stronger exchange rate wouldn't that make exports more expensive making them less competitive on the world market? You could argue this would fail to improve the B.O.P as demand for exports would fall and demand for imports would rise as they become cheaper.
    Don't fully understand that part.

    • @toddtaylor5282
      @toddtaylor5282 2 роки тому +3

      With deflation, workers can not argue for higher wages and hence do not feel as wealthy and therefore do not suck in imports from abroad, decreasing the value of imports. Also, our exports become more competitive for foreign countries and hence the value generated from exports increases significantly, giving an improvement in the BOP.

  • @akshitamodi8222
    @akshitamodi8222 Рік тому +1

    Awesome videos! Quick question: Can you also use a positive output gap diagram to show an increase in productive potential of the economy when using supplly-side policy measures?

  • @olivermccourt1226
    @olivermccourt1226 2 роки тому

    Unreal stuff

  • @harryhardy5063
    @harryhardy5063 Рік тому +7

    Can’t believe my exam is in an hour

    • @javyroo9405
      @javyroo9405 Рік тому +4

      Why did u revise macro for a micro test mate 😂

    • @harryhardy5063
      @harryhardy5063 Рік тому +1

      @@javyroo9405 Supply-Side Policies can be used in macro because they increase the supply of goods which will lead to economic growth but they can also be used in micro-economic policies because they aim at making markets and industries operate more efficiently and contribute to increasing levels of growth of real national output.
      That’s what I’ve been taught by my teacher but I’m no economist aha 🤣

    • @_ProjectHadassah
      @_ProjectHadassah 6 місяців тому

      real 💀

  • @diadaryanani1956
    @diadaryanani1956 2 роки тому

    Love u g💗💗

  • @crazy_szn8553
    @crazy_szn8553 2 роки тому

    Cheers dal

  • @snappy_one9120
    @snappy_one9120 2 роки тому +2

    can you explain why the supply curve is vertical?

    • @mattimakadsi
      @mattimakadsi 2 роки тому +4

      Its the classical theory rather than the Keynesian theory. Classical economists believe that in the long term, the economy is always at full capacity and therefore always at full employment.

  • @milochamlatte
    @milochamlatte 5 місяців тому

    Love your videos! However, isn't subsidies to promote investment to firms are free market supply side policies? As you cannot force firms to perform invest actions

  • @nikilkila467
    @nikilkila467 2 роки тому +2

    🐐🐐

  • @jasraaj_9483
    @jasraaj_9483 Рік тому +1

    thnx vikkstar

  • @snappy_one9120
    @snappy_one9120 2 роки тому +1

    Doesnt a increase in the LRAS automaticly also lead to an increase in demand (bcs of more jobs) and hence inflation?

    • @MCart1215
      @MCart1215 2 роки тому

      you can show the demand increasing, but there is no inflation as the increased supply pushes the price level down anyway. So in the end, you can show the economy operating at higher RGDP at the same price level.

  • @elliotwebb4194
    @elliotwebb4194 2 роки тому +1

    EconGOATdal

  • @frankayling8370
    @frankayling8370 2 роки тому

    The 🐐

  • @af7758
    @af7758 8 місяців тому

    Bro by watching your videos the ppc has shifted outwards as labour has become more productive

  • @JK-vm7yo
    @JK-vm7yo 2 роки тому +2

    The question is will i be able to revise all three policies in 4 days hmm

    • @umarhc
      @umarhc 2 роки тому +2

      yes

    • @JK-vm7yo
      @JK-vm7yo 2 роки тому +1

      @@umarhc I did- this shit is piss and my exam went ok tbf

    • @umarhc
      @umarhc 2 роки тому +1

      @@JK-vm7yo Congrats what exam board u with?

    • @JK-vm7yo
      @JK-vm7yo 2 роки тому

      @@umarhc Im in year 12 and with AQA

    • @umarhc
      @umarhc 2 роки тому +1

      @@JK-vm7yo ohh it was a mock. Mine is the real ones happening rn. U seem to be doing the right thing just stay consistent and you'll be great next year.

  • @jaymehta4226
    @jaymehta4226 2 роки тому +4

    if someone could send me the link for the contractionary monetary and fiscal policy videos, it would be much appreciated

    • @blacksnow8070
      @blacksnow8070 2 роки тому +1

      Same I dont think he made those videos

  • @barclaymorgan2169
    @barclaymorgan2169 8 місяців тому

    please can you explain how tax reform is not interventionist because the government surely is the one who changes it? cheers

    • @ella_mcgov2013
      @ella_mcgov2013 8 місяців тому

      Because they remove goverment intervention technically the goverment intervenes but with all market based reforms the goverment has to remove control

    • @iw_has_gone
      @iw_has_gone 8 місяців тому +1

      as you learn in micro, generally the free market will most efficiently allocate resources. market based policies are based on that assumption, the idea that reduced taxes will encourage people to spend their money in the most rational way possible. interventionist policies assume market forces alone cannot allocate these resources efficiently therefore the government must implement policies to correct any market failure - essentially correcting positive externalities in consumption

  • @zhetinggu4300
    @zhetinggu4300 2 роки тому +1

    legend!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @Major-kc9uj
    @Major-kc9uj 2 роки тому +1

    🙏🏽🙏🏽

  • @anindadatta164
    @anindadatta164 2 роки тому +4

    Can import duty reduction be considered as market related supply side policy, as the entire global supply is available to a single country at a reasonable price, thus effectively making the supply line of that product parallel to the GDP axis(X-axis).

    • @norahalex7804
      @norahalex7804 Рік тому

      Yes this falls under trade liberalisation point

  • @elspethkatiebella
    @elspethkatiebella 2 роки тому +12

    DalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDalDal

  • @kavishkumar9
    @kavishkumar9 Рік тому

    Why would SSP not be used in a recession?

    • @stefanprokopiev8483
      @stefanprokopiev8483 Рік тому +1

      Because in a recession you are trying to get the economy running and you want inflation; these supply side policies are mainly for preventing inflation once the economy is booming, therefore, you need to divert attention to expansionary demand side policies

  • @MohamedOsmanHafeez
    @MohamedOsmanHafeez 7 місяців тому

    Isn't lower income tax a demand-side policy. It increases disposable income, making demand for goods services bigger. How does that increase productive potential?
    It makes sense for lower corporation tax to increase productivity

  • @arjunsinha3841
    @arjunsinha3841 2 роки тому +1

    The goat

  • @fincroll1854
    @fincroll1854 2 роки тому

    up the dal

  • @danielgilsousastb2657
    @danielgilsousastb2657 7 місяців тому +1

    mf simply clutching up my econ IB score

  • @jaspermbinjama941
    @jaspermbinjama941 8 місяців тому

    What is lras?

  • @happyzhang5218
    @happyzhang5218 2 роки тому

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏💖💖💖💖💖💖

  • @mika1204
    @mika1204 Рік тому +2

    let him cook

    • @AneleDube-b7y
      @AneleDube-b7y 9 місяців тому

      Let him cook what? Pls don't write nonsensical things here because that's really annoying. Here's helping us for crying out loud yet you are saying this nonsense. I can't stand your nonsense.

    • @mika1204
      @mika1204 9 місяців тому +1

      @@AneleDube-b7y bro restarted

    • @HapNinja
      @HapNinja 8 місяців тому

      @@AneleDube-b7y tf

  • @zainramzan2246
    @zainramzan2246 2 роки тому

    goat

  • @rohanoruganti3805
    @rohanoruganti3805 2 роки тому

    W

  • @jowanpeckrugby3221
    @jowanpeckrugby3221 2 роки тому +1

    1st comment 🤪🤪

  • @SEJl_
    @SEJl_ Рік тому

    I WILL increase the GDP of your country Dal.

  • @bencroll9073
    @bencroll9073 2 роки тому +3

    why is tax reform considered a market based policy when tax rates are controlled by the government, does that not mean they are interventionist. econplusdal i have a shrine of you in my house

    • @MCart1215
      @MCart1215 2 роки тому

      Reducing taxes is market based as it allocates more money into the market and less into the government - INCREASING tax is interventionist as it does the opposite

  • @archee2364
    @archee2364 7 місяців тому

    Thank you

  • @jamescavan9187
    @jamescavan9187 Рік тому

    🐐🐐🐐