China is certainly "churning them out"! A VERY interesting design, and the length of available centre-line flight deck would mean this could well be useful as a "mini-Carrier" of manned aircraft. These will be cheaper (and probably faster to build) that the Super-Carriers, and might well provide a complementary air-wing role, as well as amphibious landing capability. The PLAN seems to have ticked all the boxes with this one!
The massive rollout of electromagnetic ejection means that the technology has matured. The Chinese navy is already at the forefront of exploring strategies and tactics for the new era.
If China builds a 50,000 ton LHD, it makes sense to keep up with the Jones - namely US and Japanese assault carriers which can launch the F-35B. The 076's ability to launch J-35s will ensure air-superiority, allowing it to operate apart from the Liaoning/Shandong/Fujian and head up its own task force. Such an 076 will give PLAN unparalleled flexibility and regional hegemony whether we like it or not.
It's massive for an LHD. It's bigger than the CDG. Besides the American and Chinese carriers, only the Kuznetsov and two British carriers are larger. All actual aircraft carriers from other countries don't even come anywhere close to this LHD.
The "layer" above the hangar is the gallery deck which contains equipment such as the jet blast deflector mechanisms as well as catapult and arrestors. On helicopter carriers the gallery deck has other functions. The "overhangs" that extend the deck beyond the hull sides are typically called sponsons. We often say that a carrier deck is "sponsoned out" to make it wider. The sponsons have benefits internally as well. The QE class have full electric propulsion which means the gas turbines don't need to be on the prop shafts. Thus, the QE class houses their GTs in the sponsons themselves, which eliminates the need for a lot of internal ducting running deep in the hull for air intakes and exhaust. Do we know if the 076 will have integrated electric propulsion? Another reason a stern elevator is a bad idea if using cats and arrestors is because you will often have aircraft who land short coming down on the elevator, which is not as strong as the deck, and could damage the elevator mechanism.
I don't think the overhang is the same as sponsons. Sponsons are platform extensions to install equipments like weapons and sensor turrets. The overhangs are there to support the flight deck, and will be under the part of the flight deck they support. They are separate things.
@@EurasiaNaval ah, I see where you're coming from, but consider that the sponson is there to support the flight deck, because the flight deck is also a piece of equipment. Yes, sponson also refers to smaller, discrete structures that look like small additions (to hold weapons systems or sensors, as you describe). These we often called platforms. They look like you could cut them off without affecting the ship's structure. In big ship terms (small commercial vessels define sponson differently) a sponson usually refers to a "deck extension" that contains useful volume. By this I mean that the part under the overhang isn't just flat (like you see on service vessels that have a helicopter pad mounted above the bridge). The part beneath slopes back towards the hull and has things like decks and equipment spaces inside it. Part of the definition is that it has equipment inside. US carriers have deck space inside the sponsons. The QE carriers have their GTs inside them on the port side, and the starboard side contains boat bays. So, in big ship terms, the deck has an overhang and this overhang is supported by a sponson!
@@chaoskid1211 He is correct, they construct ships for all the major shipping companies like MSC. Evergreen Group. Don't be fooled by the cheap products they send you, china builds world class bridges, ships, rockets, heavy machinery. CHINA is a world class and technologically advanced country. They play you all for fools 😂
The PLAN is innovating like mad and it seems they are very confident about their EMALS technology to make it the center piece of their carriers beginning with Fujian. Aside from this 076 LHD, the guessing is that the next two super carriers will be nuclear and may be built simultaneously in two shipyards. If so, PLAN is coming n strong in this decade. It will also be interesting to see which nuclear reactor it chooses, a PWR as is used by the US, or a thorium MSR as currently being developed by China. BTW, there appears to be a mini-carrier being built and the assumption is that this will be a drone carrier.
If China builds a 50,000 ton LHD, it makes sense to keep up with the Jones - namely US and Japanese assault carriers which can launch the F-35B. The 076's ability to launch J-35s will ensure air-superiority, allowing it to operate apart from the Liaoning/Shandong/Fujian and head up its own task force. Such an 076 will give PLAN unparalleled flexibility and regional dominance, whether we like it or not.
China understands the future of warfare belongs to A.I. and drones. That's why the country builds drones carriers which are cheaper, maybe faster and less exposed to radar detection. They also require only sailors, while pilotes can fly drones from land.
@@siberiantiger3917 You're right. 076 might even have different air complement depending on the mission. Maybe they carry more UAVs when operating with a fleet carrier, then switch to more manned fighters when operating on its own.
The US could churn out carriers like this for one third of the the price they do today. The US Military Industrial Complex is soooo CORUPT it will destroy itself in the end.
While the US Navy has to use both UAVs and manned fighters on the same old aircraft carrier built for too long, at too high a price and with too many errors, China can build aircraft carriers for specifically for UAVs and aircraft carriers specifically for J-35 with more quantity, cheaper price, more guaranteed quality, faster time. It will truly be the perfect piece for the battle to liberate the island of Taiwan in the near future and an elite warrior for the combined fleet of Sinosphere countries in the future.
Not to pick apart your comment, BUT the US Navy has 11 Nuclear Aircraft Carriers that can carry up to 80 plus aircraft carriers. China cannot even launch half of the sorties that the US Super-Carriers can. The reason we have the same old carriers, is because they are designed to last 50 years. The same old carriers jets carry far more weapons and fuel than Chinese carriers aircraft. Cheaper, Faster at a guaranteed higher quality. Take a look at China's Tofu-dreg infrastructure. Faster = lower quality. Cheaper = Corruption. Look at how many Rotten-tail buildings China has. When the US Navy builds a ship, we get it right or we scrap it. EVERY TECHNOLOGY China uses was stolen from someone else. The world KNOWS that China does not R & D anything. CCP = Copy-Cut-Paste. The type 076 is not even built. China said it is going to invade Taiwan by 2027. How is this brand new Type 076 going to be in Sea Trials by 2028? How about explaining to your ignorant viewers, how China KNOWS all of this is going to work so flawlessly. Care to share how a TOTAL LACK of Experience trumps a country has built 81 aircraft carriers and ALL of them have been used in Wars. PLAN has never fought a war. Quality. What aircraft carrier that CHINA has built that it can point to and say to all of the countries in the world, TOP THAT!!!!!! Answer = It does not exist. If you want to then point to ANY ship in the PLAN and tell the world, NO ONE has built a better ship.
LOLZ, You clearly don't know how procurement works under Communism. If something is "a new symbol of national pride", it will be put into everything - no matter if it works or not.
Long time since I last commented my friend but really happy to see the first confirmed pics of the 076 - imo I believe she will the star of the fleet until 005 (first nuclear carrier) is built Btw forgot to mention but I think we both accurately predicted 2025 as the commissioning date of the fujian and based on the sea trails being conducted- it would seem to me that October 2025 for the PLAN navy day will be fujian’s first official day on active duty
Even if an angled flight deck isn't necessary to improve sortie rates on the 076, I would still prefer it for the safety benefits. A UCAV or manned fix-wing aircraft that misses the arrestor cable could circle around for another attempt rather than crash into the aircraft parked in front.
Its crazy that within our lifetimes we will see if the US insists that Taiwan fights to the end serving its master even in death, or if it will be allowed to shake hands once the board is firmly in a Checkmate.
I watched a video of China’s recent drone convention with 500 manufacturers displaying their products. One large drone lands and takes off vertically with 3 electric horizontal props. It has a wing and a petro pusher prop for good airspeed, 1000 Kg payload and long range. I expect a larger variant to be used on the 076.
Na instead china should not engage right away other wise they will experience the same fate as russia but good thing they didn't engage in a conflict right away
I think Chinas' smaller neighbours have a very different opinion than you on, whether China is belligerent or not. For example its pursuit of the 9 dash line is hardly a symbol of friendship & harmony.
Look at the patterns when you used pictures of the L HD as the thumbnail you got a lot less views, but when you used drawings that looked more like aircraft carriers, you got a lot more views
The requirement for two Electromagnetic Catapults (EM catapult or EMAL) ensures operational continuity in case of a single unit failure. This redundancy is particularly advantageous for deploying a large number of aircraft, especially with the KJ-600 airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) system. When stacked this ship with the aircraft carriers CV-17 Shandong or CV-16 Liaoning, this configuration effectively adds two EMALs to the strike group, significantly enhancing its AEW&C launch capabilities. This increased launch capacity has the potential to outperform current US strike groups in specific scenarios.
Type 076 is looking to be almost the same size as the French Charles de Gaulle. Weight: 42.5 tons, length: 261 meters. Also twin catapults. I watched an interesting news report from a year or so ago. Where the French carrier became the Center piece of an American carrier group because the US carrier returned home. The officer interviewed said the Charles de Gaulle could take over for a Nimitz and keep up the same operational tempo. I think we’re serious underestimating this new Chinese carrier. I assume it will a compliment similar to its French counterpart. 30 x fixed wing multi role aircraft. (J15 & J35) 2 x AWACS (KJ600) 6 x rotary wing I see zero reason this will be a “drone carrier” The little goofy ships with the very high masts, those are drone carriers. This is a almost 50,000 aircraft carrier it’s going to have heavy Jets no doubt and if it has heavy jets it will likely have AWACA and refueling aircraft too.
Assessment of PLA developments depends heavily on rumours, and to an extent this involves 'faith'. Faith in terms of which sources you trust, which alleged insider to follow and so on. Each failed prediction should reduce the credibility of a source, and each true prediction should increase it. It is on the balance of these credible rumours that the consensus of the Type 076 being a drone carrier primarily is reached. So, you are right that there's no hard evidence, but this is a higher-than-usual standard of proof in what we are dealing with. But we'll see what happens. Some of the credible rumours regarding the Type 054B for example didn't turn out true, e.g. the universal UVLS and the 6,000-ton displacement (actual displacement seems closer to 5,000 ton).
@@EurasiaNaval I understand your point but I’m looking at it from another angle. I discount most rumors until I see some other evidence to corroborate them. I base my analysis on what I view as possible and likely. I really appreciate your work and everything you do. Hearing the rumors and predictions on your channel is one of the few places I find information like this. It’s fascinating. The sources you have and great in my opinion. I just don’t take things on faith. People have a tendency to be wrong even if they’ve been correct in the past. What I see is a 50,000 ton flat top warship with and island starboard side and likely 2 catapults and aircraft elevators. From my point of view it would be reckless not to see the potential of a ship with similar capabilities to De Gaulle.
I wonder if the shorter catapult can launch manned fighters with limited fuel and ordnance for fleet air defence. Such a fighter would not drop tanks or even a full fuel tank. Ordnance would be limited to relatively light air-to-air missiles, not heavy air-to-surface missiles or gravity bombs.
No real point to risk carriers in the SCS in conflict when land based aircraft can cover the region with far less risk. The more I see of the size of these ships, I’m starting to think the PLAN has targets for amphibious assault further afield… Guam maybe? Okinawa?
so what should carrier do? carriers are much better in carrying planes and Chinese Marine corp is part of navy not something like us marine corp. if you need plane, just call jet fighters from carriers, LHD play key role in landing operation, any risk of damaging amphibious ability of a LHD is unacceptable. drones are key part of landing operation because when landing on a well protected area equipped with PAC sam, large drones can play better role than jet fighters when using guided weapons such as jdam and can also operate more than 12 hours before landing which brings great benefit in reconnaissance mission. if you need more jet fighter to get area control, simply just build more carriers, if 11 is not enough just build 26, if a 80000 ton carrier is not enough just build a 150000 ton one, why always try to just put more jet fighters on LHD. in an landing operation, LHD tend to be only 50 miles away from enermy coastline, jet fighters will be spotted on lunched, us marine corp deploy F35 on LHD because they are not part of navy, they dont expect a immediate air support so they bought their own ones, but Chinese marine is part of navy, they can simply call carriers, marine should do their own things better, targeting on amphibious landing operation and coastal line fire support
i heard its gonna be 1 single straight thru runway. that means its not suitable for landing J35, unless they clear all the deck space just for it to land. i guess its only gonna house helicoptor and maybe some unmanned fix wing recon
It's more similar to French Charles de Gaulle, but it only has 1 catapult. It won't beat though a STOVL carrier with STOVL aircraft like Harriers or F-35Bs in terms of sortie rate. With how quickly STOVL aircraft can be launched and recovered, around 3 catapults are a must. It's only advantage it can launch J-35s which have more range than F-35Bs. But in a close quarter naval battle less than a 1000km wide against F-35Bs having only one catapult is a disadvantage. Best to use Type 076 to supplement Type 003 Fujian than operating independently. Even in amphib operations and CAS near shorelines like in the islands of South China Sea long range is not a necessity. They should have developed a STOVL J-35 as the advantages far outweighs the cons.
I think your assessment assumes that the Type 076 is intended for the same missions as the Charles de Gaulle, the Queen Elizabeths and to a lesser extent the America class. That is to say as a light sea control ship. However, the airwing of the 076 serves a different purpose than the above carriers - to support an amphibious assault. Given that requirement, rotary wing assets and UCAV will play a greater role, and in comparison air superiority fighters like the J-35 a lesser role. So from that perspective, less catapult capability (or lack of STOVL capability) should not be as big of a drawback.
I wonder if we will be surprised with scaled down dual prop chinook type helicopters used to transport cargo and people from ship to shore. The dual rotor design approach with overlapping rotors has potential advantages over single rotor helicopters. A large quad copter has potential advantages also.
076 isn’t that much of a carrier. It’s more like the American LHD ships. The preceding class are the 075 ships. Also it’s not a count, it’s a type. So there are three Type 075 ships for example
I believe this is the more deserving amphibious ship to be defined LHA. I'm one of those who think a ship in order to have the "L" of landing must have a well deck!!! Otherwise is a CVD or a CVDH (carrier vessel drone helicopter) light or not
@@tuomasandersson3889 the LHAs are slightly smaller and LHDs substantially smaller. But the bigger difference is neither have catapults. Not sure if the EMALS can even be fitted on a non-nuclear powered ship. The EM catapults on the 076 will allow it to launch large drones that carries bombs and missiles.
@@danielch6662 Those catapults make a huge difference - not just manned fighters, but fixed wing awacs, ew platforms... The advantage is massive and unsurmountable.
the Type 76 class is not a carrier, not even close . . . it's an LHD with a straight & fully flat flight deck . . . infact the Type 76 could have been non-amphibious . . . a multi mission expeditionary LHA is a more suitable classification than a light carrier . . .
If the J-35s are operating on China's Liaoning Carrier, that uses the ski-jump, does that mean the EMALs on the Type 076 is only capable of launching aircraft with lighter weapons and fuel. Why isn't China bragging about the Type 001, 002, 003, 004? Why are they now bragging about the Type 005. What happen to the other carriers? What went wrong with them? Make a video about why China can't brag about it's earlier carriers. I would like to see that.
The strength og China is they can install emals in such a conventional vessel which is run by diesel. This is a high tech that the USA is unable to have. That's y tge US has to design the rubbish F35B for up and down engine and can't be fully carry weights when taking off. Because the emals of usa only can be powered by nuclear reactor, can't be powered by conventional power system.
There is a reason the USA has an abundance of extra power for EMALS. If you don't, the other shipboard equipment cannot run at 100% capability 100% of the time. The Ford Class only requires 1 reactor to run EVERYTHING on the ship. The extra reactor is for ............................................. Loose lips, sink ships.
I don’t think they’re developing one as there hasn’t really been any hard evidence suggesting such a thing but I think it’s foolish for them not to. One advantage the US’ LHD’s have is the fact they can operate F-35B’s gives them a massive boost. Basically a light carrier. If China had a STOVL variant of the J-35 then that can really multiply the force of the Type 075’s.
This is a terrible thing for China .... rather than wasting time and money on weapons for war China should be spending money on fighting climate change and promoting a better relationship with the USA...
You have some mis-conception here. Firstly, Chinese military budget is about 2% of its GDP, while US is about 6~8% of GDP. So, US is spending much much more on war equipment than China, in fact, the total of next 9 countries combined. US had 11 Super carriers, yet China only had one (other two were medium sizes carriers) Secondly, the cheaper materials and laboure costs in China made it cost efficient to build new toys. If you bring exchange rate into consideration, the cost of one carrier in US, China can build two. Thirdly, China done more than any country in the world to combat Global warming, they had highest % of EVs on their road, highest Solar Panel and Wind Turbine in use. (Hence the over capacity 😂) Lastly, China had plant more trees and revert Deserts than any country in the world, again. Its easy to search on your own. Maybe US should try to make peace with China at end of the day. 😆
I will continue to say as I said before China should not build more aircraft carriers. Aircraft carriers are a waste of resources and are too vulnerable to today's missile, drone and underwater technologies and weapon system. Aircraft carriers are today what battleships were in WWII. Obsolete. Even the Philippines will be able to pose a unacceptable danger to these aircraft carriers with their BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles that they got from India.. And with air and underwater drone swarms, hypersonic missiles. They are too vulnerable and completely useless in today's modern day battlefield. Look at what Ukraine is doing to Russia's black sea fleet. Taiwan is far more technologically advanced than Ukraine. If Ukraine can do that to Russia in the black Sea then Taiwan can also do that to China in the Taiwanese straight and the waters East of Taiwan. China is making a fatal mistake by spending all these resources on these massive capital ships. China should be spending these resources on building unmanned stealth submarines and long endurance armed drones. China should also spend time on building up gazillions of unmanned air drones that can attack in mass swarms and in long distance. The problem is that navies love big ships. The senior officers want to command these big ships. They think it gives them and their navy prestige. Well prestige doesn't win you wars. They are making a big terrible mistake. The age of the aircraft carrier is gone just like the age of the battleship was gone drying WWII. I say the same for the US navy. They have the same problem. They keep building these huge Ford class ships that cost $13 Billion each when a single unmanned underwater drone that cost $10 000 to $50 000 packed with explosives cans send thar big boy to the bottom of the sea. And guess what that Ford class aircraft carrier has absolutely zero defenses against that unmanned underwater drone. Absolutely none. There is a very good chance it won't even see it coming. The country sinking thar stuff doesn't even need to have a navy. Imagine the damage the Houthi rebels would make in the red Sea if they had those. Iran Has those, Hezbolla has them. If You don't think that Taiwan and the Philippines will have those before the end of the decade, you are gravely mistaken.
Brahmos missile a threat to the PLAN? Have you seen a map, China can fire all the missiles it want into the PI's night and day even without a surface ship in the area.
@@davidz7858 yeah, you tell me how smart you are gonna look like when your $8 billion dollar aircraft carrier and 4000 sailors end up in the bottom of the sea after they get sunk by a $50 000 or $100 000 underwater unmanned drone packed with explosives. Put some AI on those underwater drones and give them ability to work in swarms and let's see how you like that too. Look at what the Ukrainians are doing to the Russian navy in the black sea. You think the Taiwanese or the Filipinos can't do that to those PLAN aircraft carriers. Everything I am saying right now is being discussed and brought up by military experts. The nature of warfare is changing before our very eyes. AI and Drones have changed the entire game. Big capital ships can be sunk by by freaking cheap underwater drones. Aircraft carriers are obsolete. The future belongs to the unmanned drones and to AI. You combine that with underwater and air bond unmanned drones working in swarms with AI and you are dead. You can't even jam today's drones cause they are programed and armed with AI. You have no idea how much things have changed. Then there is the cost component, even if you are able to intercept these drones the missiles to intercept the drones cost over $1 million to $1.5 Million a piece. The drones cost $50 000, $30 000, $20 000.
The aircraft carrier is always accompanied by at least 7 to 10 destroyers and submarines,so the idea of defenceless carrier is a fallacy, that’s goes to all carriers around the world.The lower and upper atmosphere military satellites are also involved in defending via alerting or guiding weapons when needed.Yep,aircraft carrier isn’t yet done,not for a long time!
Underpowered and unreliable built with sub par metals and lack of understanding and operations of an aircraft carrier or a helicopter carrier 😂 p.s USA has amphibious assault ships that have helicopter, drone, and vertical takeoff aircraft to support marine amphibious unit that deploys from it 😂
You're among the brainless Chinese haters who don't understand the future of warfare belongs to the A.I. and drones. That's why China builds its first carrier for drones, along with its classic helicopters carriers with amphibious vehicles.
Get an exclusive Surfshark deal! Enter the promo code Eurasia for an extra 4 months free at surfshark.deals/Eurasia
China's first 076 could very much have a Nuclear Reactor on board
ayyyyy get that bag
@verypleasantguy It’s not possible, I hope the 004 aircraft carrier will be more likely
12:15 you can tell that Eruasia really likes that joke by his voice when talking about the missile flies through the hanger.🤣
and is he a Taiwanese? I believe he is
@@bentony7548 taiwan,zuoying.
China is certainly "churning them out"! A VERY interesting design, and the length of available centre-line flight deck would mean this could well be useful as a "mini-Carrier" of manned aircraft. These will be cheaper (and probably faster to build) that the Super-Carriers, and might well provide a complementary air-wing role, as well as amphibious landing capability. The PLAN seems to have ticked all the boxes with this one!
不迷你了！5萬多頓都已經比某些國家*航母*還大了！
The massive rollout of electromagnetic ejection means that the technology has matured. The Chinese navy is already at the forefront of exploring strategies and tactics for the new era.
i think building these light carriers are more practical than 2x larger super carriers
Indeed, followed by the stealth fighter jets, attack drones, satellite guided missiles, just name some.
all junk...nothing works
@@williamblomster2387 Hope you feel better soon😎
@@kinwai27271 please come out from the rock you live under
If China builds a 50,000 ton LHD, it makes sense to keep up with the Jones - namely US and Japanese assault carriers which can launch the F-35B. The 076's ability to launch J-35s will ensure air-superiority, allowing it to operate apart from the Liaoning/Shandong/Fujian and head up its own task force. Such an 076 will give PLAN unparalleled flexibility and regional hegemony whether we like it or not.
f35b is nothing compared to those heavier fighter jet which has to be launched with electromagnetic ejection, let alone 076 has jet drones.
It's massive for an LHD. It's bigger than the CDG. Besides the American and Chinese carriers, only the Kuznetsov and two British carriers are larger. All actual aircraft carriers from other countries don't even come anywhere close to this LHD.
F35B has very very short range, 076 can launch stealth drone from 7000km away for one-way mission against US and Japanese carriers.
J-35 and air superiority don’t go in the same sentence.
@@lizhongshenour drones fly from America and fight in the gulf war and fly home 15 years ago.
The "layer" above the hangar is the gallery deck which contains equipment such as the jet blast deflector mechanisms as well as catapult and arrestors. On helicopter carriers the gallery deck has other functions.
The "overhangs" that extend the deck beyond the hull sides are typically called sponsons. We often say that a carrier deck is "sponsoned out" to make it wider.
The sponsons have benefits internally as well. The QE class have full electric propulsion which means the gas turbines don't need to be on the prop shafts. Thus, the QE class houses their GTs in the sponsons themselves, which eliminates the need for a lot of internal ducting running deep in the hull for air intakes and exhaust.
Do we know if the 076 will have integrated electric propulsion?
Another reason a stern elevator is a bad idea if using cats and arrestors is because you will often have aircraft who land short coming down on the elevator, which is not as strong as the deck, and could damage the elevator mechanism.
I don't think the overhang is the same as sponsons. Sponsons are platform extensions to install equipments like weapons and sensor turrets. The overhangs are there to support the flight deck, and will be under the part of the flight deck they support. They are separate things.
@@EurasiaNaval ah, I see where you're coming from, but consider that the sponson is there to support the flight deck, because the flight deck is also a piece of equipment. Yes, sponson also refers to smaller, discrete structures that look like small additions (to hold weapons systems or sensors, as you describe). These we often called platforms. They look like you could cut them off without affecting the ship's structure.
In big ship terms (small commercial vessels define sponson differently) a sponson usually refers to a "deck extension" that contains useful volume. By this I mean that the part under the overhang isn't just flat (like you see on service vessels that have a helicopter pad mounted above the bridge). The part beneath slopes back towards the hull and has things like decks and equipment spaces inside it. Part of the definition is that it has equipment inside. US carriers have deck space inside the sponsons. The QE carriers have their GTs inside them on the port side, and the starboard side contains boat bays.
So, in big ship terms, the deck has an overhang and this overhang is supported by a sponson!
China has the largest ship building industry in the world.
Their technology is first class.
it is all shit
Yea in china😂
@@chaoskid1211 He is correct, they construct ships for all the major shipping companies like MSC. Evergreen Group. Don't be fooled by the cheap products they send you, china builds world class bridges, ships, rockets, heavy machinery. CHINA is a world class and technologically advanced country. They play you all for fools 😂
nope at least a generation behind and goal post are moving
The PLAN is innovating like mad and it seems they are very confident about their EMALS technology to make it the center piece of their carriers beginning with Fujian. Aside from this 076 LHD, the guessing is that the next two super carriers will be nuclear and may be built simultaneously in two shipyards. If so, PLAN is coming n strong in this decade. It will also be interesting to see which nuclear reactor it chooses, a PWR as is used by the US, or a thorium MSR as currently being developed by China. BTW, there appears to be a mini-carrier being built and the assumption is that this will be a drone carrier.
God bless you China..
They don't believe in God
The depth of analysis from this channel is astounding! Learned so much! Bravo!
Type 076 carries the UAVs while the other carrier carries the manned fighters. They complement each other.
If China builds a 50,000 ton LHD, it makes sense to keep up with the Jones - namely US and Japanese assault carriers which can launch the F-35B. The 076's ability to launch J-35s will ensure air-superiority, allowing it to operate apart from the Liaoning/Shandong/Fujian and head up its own task force. Such an 076 will give PLAN unparalleled flexibility and regional dominance, whether we like it or not.
@@siberiantiger3917l actually agree with you.
China understands the future of warfare belongs to A.I. and drones. That's why the country builds drones carriers which are cheaper, maybe faster and less exposed to radar detection. They also require only sailors, while pilotes can fly drones from land.
@@GGLEDOUit’s also a waist of money when you can just build a multi platform ship. It’s China simply trying to copy turkey’s move.
@@siberiantiger3917 You're right. 076 might even have different air complement depending on the mission. Maybe they carry more UAVs when operating with a fleet carrier, then switch to more manned fighters when operating on its own.
Hahahaha it is hilarious that the Chinese PLA watchers are calling the Fujian Madam Niu because the type 076 has totally stolen the Fujian's thunder.
The new sweet heart: 076
Haha wonder how type 004 and type 005 will take it
China haters are brainless. Why does China need to steal its own technology and models? Many Western do the same thing.
076 is a game changer type....
@@fatdoi003 This kind of people have a small brain to be able to see it's a game changer.
The US could churn out carriers like this for one third of the the price they do today. The US Military Industrial Complex is soooo CORUPT it will destroy itself in the end.
Money talks at the expense of the national security.
Indeed. That is the contradiction of capitalism, it destroys itself in the end.
Quality over quantity all day.
@@BobJones-pu6by they are liberal commies.
@@Jaysqualityparts The problem is the US is churning out JUNK.
While the US Navy has to use both UAVs and manned fighters on the same old aircraft carrier built for too long, at too high a price and with too many errors, China can build aircraft carriers for specifically for UAVs and aircraft carriers specifically for J-35 with more quantity, cheaper price, more guaranteed quality, faster time. It will truly be the perfect piece for the battle to liberate the island of Taiwan in the near future and an elite warrior for the combined fleet of Sinosphere countries in the future.
It's because of the Military Industrial Complex lobby. The U.S. system is completely corrupted.
Not to pick apart your comment, BUT the US Navy has 11 Nuclear Aircraft Carriers that can carry up to 80 plus aircraft carriers. China cannot even launch half of the sorties that the US Super-Carriers can. The reason we have the same old carriers, is because they are designed to last 50 years. The same old carriers jets carry far more weapons and fuel than Chinese carriers aircraft. Cheaper, Faster at a guaranteed higher quality.
Take a look at China's Tofu-dreg infrastructure. Faster = lower quality. Cheaper = Corruption. Look at how many Rotten-tail buildings China has. When the US Navy builds a ship, we get it right or we scrap it. EVERY TECHNOLOGY China uses was stolen from someone else. The world KNOWS that China does not R & D anything. CCP = Copy-Cut-Paste.
The type 076 is not even built. China said it is going to invade Taiwan by 2027. How is this brand new Type 076 going to be in Sea Trials by 2028?
How about explaining to your ignorant viewers, how China KNOWS all of this is going to work so flawlessly. Care to share how a TOTAL LACK of Experience trumps a country has built 81 aircraft carriers and ALL of them have been used in Wars. PLAN has never fought a war. Quality. What aircraft carrier that CHINA has built that it can point to and say to all of the countries in the world, TOP THAT!!!!!! Answer = It does not exist. If you want to then point to ANY ship in the PLAN and tell the world, NO ONE has built a better ship.
“Liberate Taiwan”… they’re already free
@@furchicken Really. Here's a saying: "Who looks for a protector will find a master".
Holy cope. The US NAVY has double the tonnage of the PLAN bro, and their ships are Far more advanced.
Sit down pinky
Great progress
If they're installing d em cat before fujian tests its cat, that means they work.
That's why US calls China 'overcapacity'.
Yup, that’s why the cope of “their EMALS won’t work” is just silly.
LOLZ, You clearly don't know how procurement works under Communism.
If something is "a new symbol of national pride", it will be put into everything
- no matter if it works or not.
but they don't
@@kennethpereyda5707 Cope
Long time since I last commented my friend but really happy to see the first confirmed pics of the 076 - imo I believe she will the star of the fleet until 005 (first nuclear carrier) is built
Btw forgot to mention but I think we both accurately predicted 2025 as the commissioning date of the fujian and based on the sea trails being conducted- it would seem to me that October 2025 for the PLAN navy day will be fujian’s first official day on active duty
Good call brother good call
Kind of feel vindicated after anticipating the 076 for so long! Late 2025 seems like a good estimate for the Fujian's commissioning.
This is the most exciting ship building project currently. Can't wait to see what it finally looks like! Any info on final dimensions?
50k displacement, 250 m length and flight deck width of 50 m. These are rough calculations
Even if an angled flight deck isn't necessary to improve sortie rates on the 076, I would still prefer it for the safety benefits. A UCAV or manned fix-wing aircraft that misses the arrestor cable could circle around for another attempt rather than crash into the aircraft parked in front.
Its crazy that within our lifetimes we will see if the US insists that Taiwan fights to the end serving its master even in death, or if it will be allowed to shake hands once the board is firmly in a Checkmate.
LOLZ, If consider the U.S. Taiwans' master,
what would you call it, if Taiwan got Beijings' Hong Kong treatment?
这是不可能的，你们不了解台湾人，他们在中国这个族群里基本没有发生过战争，而且有200万台湾人在大陆做生意工作，更糟糕的是，台湾的国家叫中华民国，这是中国的前朝，百分之30的台湾人认为他们也是中国人，只要开战，国民党肯定是带头投降的，70年前他们就证明了这一点
watched again for support
Thanks!
Good joke, thank you for explaining, it scored a score of smile/facial expression.
I watched a video of China’s recent drone convention with 500 manufacturers displaying their products. One large drone lands and takes off vertically with 3 electric horizontal props. It has a wing and a petro pusher prop for good airspeed, 1000 Kg payload and long range. I expect a larger variant to be used on the 076.
CHINA, PLEASE DO NOT STOP DEFENDING THE MOTHERLAND! BLESS THE MOTHERLAND, CHINA 10,000 YEARS! TEAM CHINA ALL THE WAY AND BEYOND FOREVER!👍🙏🇨🇳🙂🐲🐼☯️☮️🌏‼️
Latest photos show that the 076 has only one electromagnetic catapult, but it is 140 meters long.
Mankind should be thankful that China is not belligerent, otherwise the world will witness the most powerful
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Na instead china should not engage right away other wise they will experience the same fate as russia but good thing they didn't engage in a conflict right away
I think Chinas' smaller neighbours have a very different opinion than you on,
whether China is belligerent or not. For example its pursuit of the 9 dash line is hardly
a symbol of friendship & harmony.
@@rickyboy6390enlighten me on the faith the Rus are facing?
it has already unleashed an army of trolls.. art of war, hype and win without fighting 😂
Never interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake - Napoleon
Thats why US is actively trying to contained China, because China makes no mistakes on their own so far.😂😂😂
And its scary.
Look at the patterns when you used pictures of the L HD as the thumbnail you got a lot less views, but when you used drawings that looked more like aircraft carriers, you got a lot more views
I hope they continue the artist impression design with angled deck. It's very unique.
The FORRESTAL class had an elevator forward on the angle deck.
Interesting design consideration...oh how far we've come in the realm of carriers
So China is 70 years behind the US in carrier design.
@@dzcav3 China has come further in 20 years than the US has in 100 💣💥
im watching the vid for the second time!!!!! just to help out
Thanks!
The requirement for two Electromagnetic Catapults (EM catapult or EMAL) ensures operational continuity in case of a single unit failure. This redundancy is particularly advantageous for deploying a large number of aircraft, especially with the KJ-600 airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) system.
When stacked this ship with the aircraft carriers CV-17 Shandong or CV-16 Liaoning, this configuration effectively adds two EMALs to the strike group, significantly enhancing its AEW&C launch capabilities.
This increased launch capacity has the potential to outperform current US strike groups in specific scenarios.
Type 076 is looking to be almost the same size as the French Charles de Gaulle. Weight: 42.5 tons, length: 261 meters. Also twin catapults.
I watched an interesting news report from a year or so ago. Where the French carrier became the Center piece of an American carrier group because the US carrier returned home.
The officer interviewed said the Charles de Gaulle could take over for a Nimitz and keep up the same operational tempo.
I think we’re serious underestimating this new Chinese carrier.
I assume it will a compliment similar to its French counterpart.
30 x fixed wing multi role aircraft. (J15 & J35)
2 x AWACS (KJ600)
6 x rotary wing
I see zero reason this will be a “drone carrier”
The little goofy ships with the very high masts, those are drone carriers. This is a almost 50,000 aircraft carrier it’s going to have heavy Jets no doubt and if it has heavy jets it will likely have AWACA and refueling aircraft too.
Assessment of PLA developments depends heavily on rumours, and to an extent this involves 'faith'. Faith in terms of which sources you trust, which alleged insider to follow and so on. Each failed prediction should reduce the credibility of a source, and each true prediction should increase it. It is on the balance of these credible rumours that the consensus of the Type 076 being a drone carrier primarily is reached. So, you are right that there's no hard evidence, but this is a higher-than-usual standard of proof in what we are dealing with.
But we'll see what happens. Some of the credible rumours regarding the Type 054B for example didn't turn out true, e.g. the universal UVLS and the 6,000-ton displacement (actual displacement seems closer to 5,000 ton).
@@EurasiaNaval I understand your point but I’m looking at it from another angle. I discount most rumors until I see some other evidence to corroborate them. I base my analysis on what I view as possible and likely.
I really appreciate your work and everything you do. Hearing the rumors and predictions on your channel is one of the few places I find information like this. It’s fascinating. The sources you have and great in my opinion. I just don’t take things on faith. People have a tendency to be wrong even if they’ve been correct in the past.
What I see is a 50,000 ton flat top warship with and island starboard side and likely 2 catapults and aircraft elevators.
From my point of view it would be reckless not to see the potential of a ship with similar capabilities to De Gaulle.
I wonder if the shorter catapult can launch manned fighters with limited fuel and ordnance for fleet air defence. Such a fighter would not drop tanks or even a full fuel tank. Ordnance would be limited to relatively light air-to-air missiles, not heavy air-to-surface missiles or gravity bombs.
I can hear you trying not to laugh as you discussed the defensive "avantages" edge elevators. lol
I really liked the elevator joke. I got it first time
A complement of say 10 J-35 + ASW helicopters would be ideal for SCS.
No real point to risk carriers in the SCS in conflict when land based aircraft can cover the region with far less risk.
The more I see of the size of these ships, I’m starting to think the PLAN has targets for amphibious assault further afield… Guam maybe? Okinawa?
@@chrisdoulou8149 no it’s for Taiwan scs does not need carriers already artificial islands built
so what should carrier do? carriers are much better in carrying planes
and Chinese Marine corp is part of navy not something like us marine corp. if you need plane, just call jet fighters from carriers, LHD play key role in landing operation, any risk of damaging amphibious ability of a LHD is unacceptable.
drones are key part of landing operation because when landing on a well protected area equipped with PAC sam, large drones can play better role than jet fighters when using guided weapons such as jdam and can also operate more than 12 hours before landing which brings great benefit in reconnaissance mission.
if you need more jet fighter to get area control, simply just build more carriers, if 11 is not enough just build 26, if a 80000 ton carrier is not enough just build a 150000 ton one, why always try to just put more jet fighters on LHD.
in an landing operation, LHD tend to be only 50 miles away from enermy coastline, jet fighters will be spotted on lunched, us marine corp deploy F35 on LHD because they are not part of navy, they dont expect a immediate air support so they bought their own ones, but Chinese marine is part of navy, they can simply call carriers, marine should do their own things better, targeting on amphibious landing operation and coastal line fire support
The threat posed by the WZ-8 drone is greater.
i heard its gonna be 1 single straight thru runway. that means its not suitable for landing J35, unless they clear all the deck space just for it to land.
i guess its only gonna house helicoptor and maybe some unmanned fix wing recon
How many are they building by the way?
8 type 075, 4 type 076.
If it's equipped with electromagnetic catapult systems, it's almost certain to carry J35 stealth fighters
Me watching it for the 3rd time as a sign of support lol
Thanks man!!
076 is Sea Control Ship. Similar to U.S.S. America aviation variant .
Can you do a video about the upcoming warships?
It's more similar to French Charles de Gaulle, but it only has 1 catapult. It won't beat though a STOVL carrier with STOVL aircraft like Harriers or F-35Bs in terms of sortie rate. With how quickly STOVL aircraft can be launched and recovered, around 3 catapults are a must. It's only advantage it can launch J-35s which have more range than F-35Bs. But in a close quarter naval battle less than a 1000km wide against F-35Bs having only one catapult is a disadvantage. Best to use Type 076 to supplement Type 003 Fujian than operating independently. Even in amphib operations and CAS near shorelines like in the islands of South China Sea long range is not a necessity. They should have developed a STOVL J-35 as the advantages far outweighs the cons.
I think your assessment assumes that the Type 076 is intended for the same missions as the Charles de Gaulle, the Queen Elizabeths and to a lesser extent the America class. That is to say as a light sea control ship. However, the airwing of the 076 serves a different purpose than the above carriers - to support an amphibious assault. Given that requirement, rotary wing assets and UCAV will play a greater role, and in comparison air superiority fighters like the J-35 a lesser role. So from that perspective, less catapult capability (or lack of STOVL capability) should not be as big of a drawback.
@@EurasiaNaval So it's less capable in terms of providing CAS
@@johnsilver9338 J-35 is not for CAS - that's my point
I wonder if we will be surprised with scaled down dual prop chinook type helicopters used to transport cargo and people from ship to shore. The dual rotor design approach with overlapping rotors has potential advantages over single rotor helicopters. A large quad copter has potential advantages also.
i saw by the google earth one aircraft carrier under construction at the dalian dock.
"AHAHAHAHAHAHA Double Electric bombs!!!!" i didnt get that
How did they jump from aircraft carrier 03 to 076?
076 isn’t that much of a carrier. It’s more like the American LHD ships. The preceding class are the 075 ships.
Also it’s not a count, it’s a type. So there are three Type 075 ships for example
It Will be indeed an aircraftcarrier.
Great channel about interesting videos
Have you seen the new photo that has just surfaced this morning? Everyone on Weibo seems quite confused.
Yes. There was no time to incorporate that
What is it of?
@@Nordy941 only one electromagnetic catapults, not two. But the length is 100 meters. It's confusing
@@パン-r7h interesting thanks
@@パン-r7h the art of Confucius
I believe this is the more deserving amphibious ship to be defined LHA.
I'm one of those who think a ship in order to have the "L" of landing must have a well deck!!!
Otherwise is a CVD or a CVDH (carrier vessel drone helicopter) light or not
Back to bump up the views for your channel and sponsor. Wouldn’t bother if the content wasn’t worth it, but it definitely is.
Hope this helps
Thanks man!!
So basically...its a mini carrier
drone carrier
Yes. No difference between it and US lightning carriers.
It's not really that mini. It's an LHD that is bigger than the CDG and both of India's carriers.
@@tuomasandersson3889 the LHAs are slightly smaller and LHDs substantially smaller. But the bigger difference is neither have catapults. Not sure if the EMALS can even be fitted on a non-nuclear powered ship. The EM catapults on the 076 will allow it to launch large drones that carries bombs and missiles.
@@danielch6662 Those catapults make a huge difference - not just manned fighters, but fixed wing awacs, ew platforms... The advantage is massive and unsurmountable.
I misunderstood the 076 hull to the 004 hull...
the Type 76 class is not a carrier, not even close . . . it's an LHD with a straight & fully flat flight deck . . . infact the Type 76 could have been non-amphibious . . . a multi mission expeditionary LHA is a more suitable classification than a light carrier . . .
If the J-35s are operating on China's Liaoning Carrier, that uses the ski-jump, does that mean the EMALs on the Type 076 is only capable of launching aircraft with lighter weapons and fuel. Why isn't China bragging about the Type 001, 002, 003, 004? Why are they now bragging about the Type 005. What happen to the other carriers? What went wrong with them? Make a video about why China can't brag about it's earlier carriers. I would like to see that.
The strength og China is they can install emals in such a conventional vessel which is run by diesel. This is a high tech that the USA is unable to have. That's y tge US has to design the rubbish F35B for up and down engine and can't be fully carry weights when taking off. Because the emals of usa only can be powered by nuclear reactor, can't be powered by conventional power system.
There is a reason the USA has an abundance of extra power for EMALS. If you don't, the other shipboard equipment cannot run at 100% capability 100% of the time. The Ford Class only requires 1 reactor to run EVERYTHING on the ship. The extra reactor is for ............................................. Loose lips, sink ships.
Meanwhile, I had a sneak peek at the super secret plans of the futuristic super duper US aircraft carrier, the USS Donald Tumper.
🇨🇳 È il Massino dall'efficienza. Meglio di cosi Deve Solo Volare. N.B. Prima che Volano. PRITEZZIONE. Cannoni LASER O MAGNETICI. ✌🇨🇳
Ooooooo yessssssssss
Can you expand your channel to include Chinese air force content too? Would get far more views.
agreed!
So many little -- Don't Touch Her -- dogs on this channel...
Stop being so scared... We will protect you
Early gang rise up
Sinister.
second time viewing😎
CN CN CN
China power militer world
Come get some China. 🇺🇲
Why would you put catapults on a amphibious assault ship ?
Makes 0 sense
Why they even making a type 076 anyway?
why not
comeback of the escort carrier
👍👍
👍
👍🏻
EML on a L... My head hurts. Ok, i guess you're gonna have to learn.
Never interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I liked the joke
TheMighty🇨🇳💯😘💪💪💪
How is China's STOVL F-35B like jet coming along?
I don’t think they’re developing one as there hasn’t really been any hard evidence suggesting such a thing but I think it’s foolish for them not to. One advantage the US’ LHD’s have is the fact they can operate F-35B’s gives them a massive boost. Basically a light carrier. If China had a STOVL variant of the J-35 then that can really multiply the force of the Type 075’s.
@@Flightman453没有人会去制造F35B这样的垃圾
Why just show china's ship? Its a military ship.if you should show America ship.you would be jail because its national security
我嘞个076啊，海军到底计划要造多少艘，我感觉我们在近海跟美国佬拼已经完全够用了，就算放到太平洋也不是完全打不过啊，把两栖舰队造的这么离谱完全没必要，我们又不是去登录美利坚，养这么大的两栖舰队咱们海军人够吗
This is a terrible thing for China .... rather than wasting time and money on weapons for war China should be spending money on fighting climate change and promoting a better relationship with the USA...
You have some mis-conception here.
Firstly, Chinese military budget is about 2% of its GDP, while US is about 6~8% of GDP. So, US is spending much much more on war equipment than China, in fact, the total of next 9 countries combined.
US had 11 Super carriers, yet China only had one (other two were medium sizes carriers)
Secondly, the cheaper materials and laboure costs in China made it cost efficient to build new toys. If you bring exchange rate into consideration, the cost of one carrier in US, China can build two.
Thirdly, China done more than any country in the world to combat Global warming, they had highest % of EVs on their road, highest Solar Panel and Wind Turbine in use. (Hence the over capacity 😂)
Lastly, China had plant more trees and revert Deserts than any country in the world, again. Its easy to search on your own.
Maybe US should try to make peace with China at end of the day. 😆
🙏♥🀄🀄🈶🉐🈵♥♥♥
I will continue to say as I said before China should not build more aircraft carriers.
Aircraft carriers are a waste of resources and are too vulnerable to today's missile, drone and underwater technologies and weapon system.
Aircraft carriers are today what battleships were in WWII.
Obsolete.
Even the Philippines will be able to pose a unacceptable danger to these aircraft carriers with their BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles that they got from India..
And with air and underwater drone swarms, hypersonic missiles. They are too vulnerable and completely useless in today's modern day battlefield.
Look at what Ukraine is doing to Russia's black sea fleet.
Taiwan is far more technologically advanced than Ukraine.
If Ukraine can do that to Russia in the black Sea then Taiwan can also do that to China in the Taiwanese straight and the waters East of Taiwan.
China is making a fatal mistake by spending all these resources on these massive capital ships.
China should be spending these resources on building unmanned stealth submarines and long endurance armed drones.
China should also spend time on building up gazillions of unmanned air drones that can attack in mass swarms and in long distance.
The problem is that navies love big ships. The senior officers want to command these big ships. They think it gives them and their navy prestige.
Well prestige doesn't win you wars.
They are making a big terrible mistake.
The age of the aircraft carrier is gone just like the age of the battleship was gone drying WWII.
I say the same for the US navy.
They have the same problem.
They keep building these huge Ford class ships that cost $13 Billion each when a single unmanned underwater drone that cost $10 000 to $50 000 packed with explosives cans send thar big boy to the bottom of the sea.
And guess what that Ford class aircraft carrier has absolutely zero defenses against that unmanned underwater drone.
Absolutely none.
There is a very good chance it won't even see it coming.
The country sinking thar stuff doesn't even need to have a navy.
Imagine the damage the Houthi rebels would make in the red Sea if they had those.
Iran Has those, Hezbolla has them.
If You don't think that Taiwan and the Philippines will have those before the end of the decade, you are gravely mistaken.
You are not as smart as you think
Brahmos missile a threat to the PLAN? Have you seen a map, China can fire all the missiles it want into the PI's night and day even without a surface ship in the area.
Thank you for your insight. PLA will take note
@@davidz7858 yeah, you tell me how smart you are gonna look like when your $8 billion dollar aircraft carrier and 4000 sailors end up in the bottom of the sea after they get sunk by a $50 000 or $100 000 underwater unmanned drone packed with explosives.
Put some AI on those underwater drones and give them ability to work in swarms and let's see how you like that too.
Look at what the Ukrainians are doing to the Russian navy in the black sea.
You think the Taiwanese or the Filipinos can't do that to those PLAN aircraft carriers.
Everything I am saying right now is being discussed and brought up by military experts.
The nature of warfare is changing before our very eyes.
AI and Drones have changed the entire game.
Big capital ships can be sunk by by freaking cheap underwater drones.
Aircraft carriers are obsolete.
The future belongs to the unmanned drones and to AI.
You combine that with underwater and air bond unmanned drones working in swarms with AI and you are dead.
You can't even jam today's drones cause they are programed and armed with AI.
You have no idea how much things have changed.
Then there is the cost component, even if you are able to intercept these drones the missiles to intercept the drones cost over $1 million to $1.5 Million a piece.
The drones cost $50 000, $30 000, $20 000.
The aircraft carrier is always accompanied by at least 7 to 10 destroyers and submarines,so the idea of defenceless carrier is a fallacy, that’s goes to all carriers around the world.The lower and upper atmosphere military satellites are also involved in defending via alerting or guiding weapons when needed.Yep,aircraft carrier isn’t yet done,not for a long time!
Great joke I laughed
Yup, what do we expect with a picture like yours?!
all made of bamboo...and lies
Always copycat....
I am here to help watched already 😊
Thanks!
MADE IN CHINA 😂😂😂
Look jealous and frustrate😁
Floating tofu
Hungry my little-D-boi?
Cope
Just like Eisenhower
Look jealous and frustrate😁
WTF! Why is chiina bulding so many aircraft carriers? To sell on Alibaba Express?
No, they've planned to sell on Temu
Wow, I thought you got paid by the CCP! Imagine double dipping and getting sponsored by Surfshark XD. Capitalism at work
Junk😂
Look jealous and frustrated.😁
@@kendopa9604 no just feel sorry it’s such poor quality
我作为中国人同意你的观点，我们的武器太烂了
Underpowered and unreliable built with sub par metals and lack of understanding and operations of an aircraft carrier or a helicopter carrier 😂 p.s USA has amphibious assault ships that have helicopter, drone, and vertical takeoff aircraft to support marine amphibious unit that deploys from it 😂
Damn bro you letting some UA-cam video make you mad for no reason lol
The more you people denigrate China and the PLA, the more desperate you appear to tywbrest of us.
You're among the brainless Chinese haters who don't understand the future of warfare belongs to the A.I. and drones. That's why China builds its first carrier for drones, along with its classic helicopters carriers with amphibious vehicles.
I think someone got triggered. You okay bro?
If you look at all his comments on this channel about china, they are all negative and arrogant.
Well done, China!
Just copy in China 😅😅
Look jealous andfrustrate😁
@@kendopa9604the truth is the truth, China Will never be USA
Let's hope not, we wouldn't want China to go around the globe killing millions of people over the decades like the USA