Why do the Strongest Parts Look Like This?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 чер 2024
  • I've wanted to do the history of topology optimization for a while, so here goes! Back to the regularly scheduled content after the move.
    Thanks for watching!
    And as always, My social media:
    Instagram: / wesleykagan
    Patreon: / wesleykagan
    Website: www.wesleykagan.com
    For promotional inquiries: wesley.kagan@gmail.com
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 952

  • @WesleyKagan
    @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +1222

    The fan broke again

    • @peejay1981
      @peejay1981 2 роки тому +59

      The OnlyFan?

    • @Minty1337
      @Minty1337 2 роки тому +18

      3d print a new fan so you can reprint one every time it breaks

    • @MiniMoto0098
      @MiniMoto0098 2 роки тому +16

      Are you talking about the fan on your GPU radiator?

    • @AmritGrewal31
      @AmritGrewal31 2 роки тому +23

      @@peejay1981 if the onlyFan broke, then perhaps it is time to pay attention to the hub.

    • @wvuvino21
      @wvuvino21 2 роки тому +3

      Deltron is chron!

  • @napalmholocaust9093
    @napalmholocaust9093 2 роки тому +2417

    When I have to stack books on the floor, I make seriously sure one on dif. equations is on the bottom, in case of a flood. I consider this topographic optimization.

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +334

      That's a good plan. I didn't dare go too in depth, It's not my field of expertise

    • @ellisjackson3355
      @ellisjackson3355 2 роки тому +12

      Lmao

    • @Zengineer
      @Zengineer 2 роки тому +34

      Matrix algebra on top of that too...

    • @colin300
      @colin300 2 роки тому +4

      *math*

    • @RLRSwanson
      @RLRSwanson 2 роки тому +16

      Advanced engineering mathematics and everything dealing with statics, machine parts design-whatever you'd call it in English, statistics etc. are on the bottom row of my bookcase of work related literature...in case of flooding or some such.

  • @vasyapupken
    @vasyapupken 2 роки тому +665

    there is one big misconception about "strong" and "optimized". optimized geometry parts are not particularly strong.
    they have better weight/strength ratio, yes, for one particular load scenario which they are optimized for.
    "optimization" means that we leave only material which is necessary for carrying a particular load, removing all material making part weaker for other (unexpected) loads and therefore unreliable.

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +165

      I mean, that's also where the bigger chunk of FEA comes in, and if you're truly designing a part that has a real world application outside of normal parameters, you can get close but there's nothing better than physical testing.

    • @sayingnigromakesyoutubecry2647
      @sayingnigromakesyoutubecry2647 2 роки тому +11

      But if the part is designed to support a certain load of 500 N, then you can make it support 5000 N. It will have a lot more of material but also will be stronger and support other loads you didn't think of.

    • @zazethe6553
      @zazethe6553 2 роки тому +33

      @@sayingnigromakesyoutubecry2647 If you use the same volume/weight of metal that supports 5000 N and use optimized geometry, you can support maybe 20000 N.

    • @sayingnigromakesyoutubecry2647
      @sayingnigromakesyoutubecry2647 2 роки тому +3

      @@zazethe6553 the idea was to use optimize it for 5000 not 20.000, using the same direction for the forces

    • @zazethe6553
      @zazethe6553 2 роки тому +3

      @@sayingnigromakesyoutubecry2647 I see, I thought you meant that it would be better to not optimize and just fill the space to make it stronger. I misunderstood your point.

  • @mattsoup4121
    @mattsoup4121 2 роки тому +713

    I'm an engineer in aerospace and topology optimization + good metal additive manufacturing is a game changer for some applications. There are dozens of assemblies on rockets and rocket engines that can be reduced to 10% or less of the part count.
    Anyway, this was a good quick overview. It's good when people learn about things they won't necessarily use but are becoming a big deal in industry

    • @AmritGrewal31
      @AmritGrewal31 2 роки тому +18

      Did you mean "by 10%" or did you actually mean "to 10%," because wow

    • @mattsoup4121
      @mattsoup4121 2 роки тому +44

      @@AmritGrewal31 I meant what I said. To 10%. Complex assemblies are often a requirement of the manufacturing capabilities you have access to. When manufacturing those geometries becomes "click print" (this is an oversimplification) you wipe out parts, fasteners, brackets, etc.

    • @carlosvargasbatman
      @carlosvargasbatman 2 роки тому +3

      Part of the limitation is price, laser sintering is ungodly expensive.

    • @Bruno-cb5gk
      @Bruno-cb5gk 2 роки тому +18

      @@carlosvargasbatman which is why you won't be seeing fully 3D printed planes any time soon, but its a great technology for small and intricate components, especially when high performance is required. As the person above said, in certain cases it can cut down the number of parts in an assembly by an order of magnitude, which can tip the scales in favour of printing when you consider that someone has to assemble all those parts, then someone else has to take them apart and assemble them again during maintenance.

    • @mattsoup4121
      @mattsoup4121 2 роки тому +13

      @@carlosvargasbatman The cost is quite reasonable for replacing machined components made of exotic materials.

  • @Scoots1994
    @Scoots1994 2 роки тому +285

    I saw a powder coat spray head that looked bizarre. Like a machinist setup the CNC lathe wrong. But it was found to be the most efficient shape to minimize waste and speed the process. They found it by taking thousands of random designs, using computers to test them down to 10 then they made those 10 and tested them, and the one they thought would be among the worst was the best.
    It amazing that after all this time we still don't know what we don't know.

    • @bismuth7730
      @bismuth7730 2 роки тому +22

      i wanna see it. Why didnt you leave a name or something lol

    • @NoTraceOfSense
      @NoTraceOfSense 2 роки тому +9

      We don’t know everything, we just know what we know.

    • @mannycalavera121
      @mannycalavera121 2 роки тому +5

      Link? Something I'm interested in reading about

    • @Scoots1994
      @Scoots1994 2 роки тому +16

      @@mannycalavera121 sorry, I was working for a contractor doing process management in the plant and have no idea which company it was

    • @Jarmezrocks
      @Jarmezrocks 2 роки тому +2

      What an awesome comment👍
      Thanks for sharing

  • @Nomad5d
    @Nomad5d 2 роки тому +166

    I'm a mechanical engineer and have done a bit of FEA and top op over the years. This was a great description and enjoyed the reference to the 100+ year old paper describing the process. My boss and I like to point out that there are few new ideas. Eventually we just learn how to make the old ideas work well enough to be useful.

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +21

      I just like finding ways that basic concepts are applied, and this is such a good example of something being ahead of its time

    • @cannaroe1213
      @cannaroe1213 2 роки тому +2

      Your boss lets you watch UA-cam?! Now that's a new idea! :)

    • @nickleland2131
      @nickleland2131 2 роки тому +2

      Just curious, what 100+ year papers are you referring to? Would love to take a look at them for more information

    • @GoogleEqualsEvil
      @GoogleEqualsEvil Рік тому +3

      @@nickleland2131 1) The fact that you're asking that question makes me seriously doubt you'll be able to understand Michell's work. 2) It's a singular paper, not papers. 3) Watch the video again...if you still haven't figured it out, It's at 5:28 where he talks about A.G.M. Michell's paper that was published in 1904 in the "London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science". 4) Michell's paper provided the foundation for modern topology based optimization techniques.

    • @nickleland2131
      @nickleland2131 Рік тому +4

      @@GoogleEqualsEvilFair enough but no reason to be rude about it. Rewatched the video and don’t know how I missed it 10 months ago. I work mainly with CFD components but I was working on a project regarding FEA and wanted to do some extra research. Appreciate the late reply.

  • @FirstLast-tx3yj
    @FirstLast-tx3yj 2 роки тому +741

    The heavy part broke at about 50
    While the topologically optimized broke at 45
    For 60% weight savings this is well worth it and another iteration where you try to strengthen the area that broke might move the weak point to the same location it was in the original part
    Even with a bit of added material 50% weight savings with the same breaking point both at 50 kg or 50lbs is beyond amazing

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +178

      Yeah, I know the weak spot in this model and I want to fix it, and I have an idea coming up for it…

    • @FirstLast-tx3yj
      @FirstLast-tx3yj 2 роки тому +35

      @@WesleyKagan since you always do crazy projects
      Would it be possible for you to tale a 3d model of Bmw s1000rr chassis use topology optimisation on it and then compare it to the 3d printed s1000rr frame you can find online
      Just a crazy suggestion

    • @SteveLowe65
      @SteveLowe65 2 роки тому +9

      @@FirstLast-tx3yj I had a similar thought: how could this be applied to tubular race car chassis? Lower weight, same strength is very appealing.

    • @FirstLast-tx3yj
      @FirstLast-tx3yj 2 роки тому +6

      @@SteveLowe65 it cannot to a tubular chassis
      Carbon fiber Monocoque is the way to go for a single seater
      A spaceframe with carbon fiber parts as much as possible for a race car based on a road car
      There is a 3d printed exotoc car check it out

    • @samfedorka5629
      @samfedorka5629 2 роки тому +9

      @@FirstLast-tx3yj You raise an interesting point, but you can do topology optimization to figure out the thickness of the carbon fiber monocoque at various points in the chassis based on the required loads and safety considerations.

  • @michaelzumpano7318
    @michaelzumpano7318 2 роки тому +25

    You really hit this from a different angle. I loved the fact that you gave us the historical context and motivations.

  • @EmyrDerfel
    @EmyrDerfel 2 роки тому +76

    If Königsberg is hard to pronounce, you could call it Kaliningrad, its name since 1946. It also spent 200 years as Królewiec in the Kingdom of Poland.

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +19

      Very true. I felt it was good to keep Konigsberg for simplicity, although I don't do well with pronunciation.

    • @TobyClark1966
      @TobyClark1966 2 роки тому +14

      @@WesleyKagan By the way, Edinburgh is pronounced 'Ed-in-bruh'. Really interesting video - thanks!

    • @scruffy3121
      @scruffy3121 2 роки тому +1

      Fun fact. Königsberg means as much as Kings mountain .

  • @Strike86
    @Strike86 2 роки тому +5

    For anyone curious, Bernoulli and Euler's blood pressure measuring method basically involved jamming a glass tube into a live artery and measuring how far the blood climbed up it.
    Interestingly this method of measuring pressure is still used today in aircraft - Bernoulli's calculations inspired the Pitot tube which almost all aircraft use to calculate airspeed by measuring the air pressure inside it.

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +2

      Yes- exactly. It wasn't a pleasant thing to read. But, it worked.

  • @Derpuwolf
    @Derpuwolf 2 роки тому +32

    Love this introduction to topology optimization. It had been a while since I've looked into it. It's surprising how much matter is wasted on commonly designed parts, I for one would love to see more topologically optimized designs.

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +12

      Thanks! I agree, as it becomes more viable for local solutions, i.e cloud based or not needing a week to run a study, I feel it will become a basic design step.

  • @josuevalar6465
    @josuevalar6465 2 роки тому +13

    Your video style is really engaging, love the funny bits here and there xD

  • @JulianFoley
    @JulianFoley 2 роки тому +33

    Brilliant explanation - clear, witty and comprehensive. You should apply for the job of my Engineering professor. I'll see if I can arrange his early retirement.

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +7

      Thanks! I don't think they would hire me, though hah

    • @erazn9077
      @erazn9077 2 роки тому +4

      Vaguely threatening lol

  • @dustinsinn6688
    @dustinsinn6688 2 роки тому +13

    Gotta say. Seeing the Deltron 3030 on album art on the middle monitor just made me like your content even more. 🤣

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +4

      Haha, it's a fantastic album! One of my favorites.

    • @Sunflowrrunner
      @Sunflowrrunner 2 роки тому

      Upgrade your grey matter, because someday it may matter.

  • @rocketplane8862
    @rocketplane8862 2 роки тому +14

    Came for the engineering and tinkering, stayed for the sense of humor. Loving the videos!

  • @Slato
    @Slato 2 роки тому

    first video of yours i watched. loved your personality and the nonchalant info dumping. love the content!

  • @CharlesVanNoland
    @CharlesVanNoland 2 роки тому +167

    Great vid. Just an FYI, "Euler" is pronounced "oiler" rather than "yewler" - I didn't find out myself until after maybe a decade of saying "yewler". :P

    • @dam1917
      @dam1917 2 роки тому +18

      Math professor didn't correct your pronunciation?

    • @gavinpotter8741
      @gavinpotter8741 2 роки тому +26

      @@dam1917 math professer pronounced it yewler

    • @radhathapa8111
      @radhathapa8111 2 роки тому

      @@gavinpotter8741 same

    • @802Garage
      @802Garage 2 роки тому +7

      My programming professor made sure we knew the right way, he just didn't care which way we said it. 😂

    • @vectornine
      @vectornine 2 роки тому +11

      he says it both ways in the video

  • @lucagattoni-celli1377
    @lucagattoni-celli1377 2 роки тому +7

    These videos are hidden gems and you should keep making them.

  • @currydood
    @currydood 2 роки тому +1

    Wes mate I gotta say I love the way you break concepts down. From one teacher to another, really good job.

  • @bats__
    @bats__ 2 роки тому +22

    The things solidworks is capable of constantly blows my mind

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +7

      It's pretty impressive.

    • @802Garage
      @802Garage 2 роки тому +6

      It's when I try to think of the countless hours of programming and testing that went into it that my brain really fries.

  • @confuzionn4843
    @confuzionn4843 2 роки тому +4

    Thank you so much for making this video, and a special thanks for talking about the history of it, which was especially interesting. This video is especially helpful to me as I'm attempting to design a space frame chassis out of cardboard as an application to an FSAE team, and I wanted to learn more about the mathematics involved in calculating something like this. I know it kinda divides the audience sometimes, but I love when you talk about the mathematics and theory behind it, and especially when you apply that theory so it doesn't get boring.

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks for watching! Sounds like a cool project. There’s so much to these systems that it’s hard to get a handle on all of them

  • @GregGuitarist98
    @GregGuitarist98 2 роки тому +3

    i dropped out of school for engineering when covid hit, but i love that you explain this enough where I can wrap my mind around it

  • @delty8862
    @delty8862 Рік тому +1

    Just discovered your channel. Your seamless mix of deadpan comedy and scientific explanations delivered in a way that even a simpleton like me could understand was very refreshing. Subbed

  • @whoismrk
    @whoismrk 2 роки тому

    The jokes and your delivery are perfect I really like the personal touches

  • @Gunbudder
    @Gunbudder 2 роки тому +3

    6:24 I've never seen this formally explained. i only ever saw the practical application where you can let gravity pull on a plastic shape, and the shape it forms will be that objects strongest compression shape against gravity when you invert it. For example, the arc that a piece of paper makes when draped between two points (a catenary) will be that paper's strongest shape in compression. i've seen this used with resin casting to make bridge supports or other similar shapes. you can also use a chain to trace out a catenary shaped mold for concrete to make an arch

  • @tyleradams8091
    @tyleradams8091 2 роки тому +3

    He's doing everything I wanted to do... generative design, active suspension, active aero, freevalve tech... all homologated into a technological marvel (I'm glad to see someone with the knowledge to do so)

  • @kylethecreator
    @kylethecreator 2 роки тому

    First video I have seen of yours wesley and I'd like to let you know you immediately hooked me and your sense of humer is one I strive for in my videos! You are so well research and I can thank you enough for that!

  • @Oto265
    @Oto265 Рік тому

    Love the format!

  • @IbrahemAlbanawi
    @IbrahemAlbanawi 2 роки тому +5

    Your content is really good and different and for some reason is fun even if it's just explaining something scientific it's really amazing

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +3

      Thank you! I appreciate it!

    • @IbrahemAlbanawi
      @IbrahemAlbanawi 2 роки тому +2

      @@WesleyKagan Your welcome from Saudiarabia

  • @davidsirmons
    @davidsirmons 2 роки тому +9

    As a layman, I nonetheless found this fascinating. Thank you.

  • @firesoul453
    @firesoul453 2 роки тому

    I was just wondering about this. Appreciate the video!

  • @XBuilder01
    @XBuilder01 2 роки тому

    I've been wondering about this for years. Thank you for the answer

  • @The.Talent
    @The.Talent 2 роки тому +35

    This is perhaps one of my favourite videos of yours. I’m an engineer and total Euler fanboy. Like, I tried to convince my wife we could name one of our kids after him. We only have daughters.

    • @The.Talent
      @The.Talent 2 роки тому +15

      I did feel physical pain when you said Euler’s name.

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +10

      Thank you! It's one I've wanted to work on for a while. Also a big fan of Euler.

    • @ellisjackson3355
      @ellisjackson3355 2 роки тому +5

      She didn't like Eulerina?

    • @The.Talent
      @The.Talent 2 роки тому +15

      @@ellisjackson3355 I have accepted the compromise that we will name our next dog Euler.

    • @ngallakp62
      @ngallakp62 2 роки тому +12

      Didn’t want to make that her middle name? First name olive

  • @a_Fax_Machine
    @a_Fax_Machine 2 роки тому +3

    I learn something every time I watch one of your videos. I wish I had the drive to learn complex math. I feel like my high school years were wasted.

  • @oancemr
    @oancemr 2 роки тому

    2:55 that jab at basically every video trying to explain a topic on youtube earned my subscribe. Good shit

  • @NoNTr1v1aL
    @NoNTr1v1aL 2 роки тому +1

    Absolutely amazing video!

  • @Zengineer
    @Zengineer 2 роки тому +3

    First! lol. Seriously, like the concept of this video a lot. Very informative and interesting! Does the new house have a larger shop?

  • @phenomanII
    @phenomanII 2 роки тому +7

    Hmm, I wonder whether you're considering creating a land speed racer :)

  • @baxtergonzalez1115
    @baxtergonzalez1115 2 роки тому

    Honestly phenomenal video, informative and entertaining! Looking forward to more

  • @kevinw.5149
    @kevinw.5149 2 роки тому +2

    Good luck on the move!

  • @tiitsaul9036
    @tiitsaul9036 2 роки тому +20

    Cool. Hey would you design a car wheel optimised for weight? I’ve been wondering what would optimal car wheel look like, if aesthetics and brakes are not an issue.

    • @Asdayasman
      @Asdayasman 2 роки тому +7

      You have to define "car" really carefully. If it's made out of steel and rolls, I'll give you a nail. If it moves under its own power, I'll give you a helium balloon. So forth.

    • @Derpuwolf
      @Derpuwolf 2 роки тому +1

      @@Asdayasman I believe he wants a car wheel though, like the metal cylinders that hold the tires. Cuz a whole car would be difficult, as you described.

    • @D3nn1s
      @D3nn1s 2 роки тому +1

      Basically look at the bugatti bolide

    • @tiitsaul9036
      @tiitsaul9036 2 роки тому +1

      @@D3nn1s bolder wheels look aero dynamic and good brake cooling. Are these structurally optimal, I have no idea.

    • @802Garage
      @802Garage 2 роки тому +4

      I haven't actually seen a full analysis, but I believe it ends up serious to most of the wheels you see which have Y shaped spokes. As in, a single point coming out from the center of the wheel, splitting into two points which go to the outer rim. Several of those repeated. Tend to be the lightest wheels with the most strength. Add this sort of optimization and they become smoothed and curvy with some wider and skinnier parts. Just my general guess and drawing from old memories. I could be way off.

  • @PhilipSmolen
    @PhilipSmolen 2 роки тому +3

    Any progress on the all mechanical computer?

  • @nanadolphin
    @nanadolphin 2 роки тому

    This is my first time seeing your channel and this video is fantastic! thank you!

  • @AlbertDoes
    @AlbertDoes 2 роки тому

    Really interesting video Wesley, thanks!

  • @agenericaccount3935
    @agenericaccount3935 2 роки тому +3

    Layman here. Those initial designs you flashed up really remind me of biological extractions. Like, mimicking trees and musculoskeletal assemblies. Biomimetics, I think, is the term?

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +5

      Essentially- yes! Generative design uses similar structure to biological design in formation like plant structure

    • @agenericaccount3935
      @agenericaccount3935 2 роки тому +2

      @@WesleyKagan Superb! Leaving smarter than I came in. I guess Nature has been doing this sort of thing for aeons. Makes sense to sort of crib her blueprints for the some of the starting points.
      Hope the move goes well. Bigger castle, bigger booms.

  • @MaximilianonMars
    @MaximilianonMars Рік тому

    This was a very good video! Educational and funny, I am glad to have found your channel and have subscribed.

  • @nicolasreidy9289
    @nicolasreidy9289 Рік тому

    This is so enlightening. Thanks.

  • @PRFCTMANDEM
    @PRFCTMANDEM 2 роки тому

    Your humour is so subtle but hilarious, love it sick video

  • @2timotei
    @2timotei 2 роки тому +1

    Short and on point. Thanks!

  • @weston8751
    @weston8751 Рік тому

    Incredible video and explanation! It was awesome to see where everything came from and how it came together over time and how technology changed its uses.

  • @-mystic-93
    @-mystic-93 2 роки тому

    This is a great video! Very informative and educational while still being funny and casual!

  • @evankress8038
    @evankress8038 Рік тому

    Great video! Love the wall mounted computer too...

  • @makeitlastify
    @makeitlastify Рік тому

    Thank you for your time.

  • @intensemojo
    @intensemojo 2 роки тому

    This was fantastic on many levels, but I appreciate the conversation in the comments nearly as much as the content. This (and you, WK) made my day. Thanks.

    • @WesleyKagan
      @WesleyKagan  2 роки тому +1

      I completely agree! The conversation in the comments is one of my favorite parts of having a channel.

  • @MogulSuccess
    @MogulSuccess Рік тому +1

    love your wall-top computer!

  • @AyushBakshi
    @AyushBakshi 2 роки тому

    That's the best demonstration i've seen. great video

  • @imac6
    @imac6 2 роки тому

    Fascinating topic, well presented, bravo!

  • @nugenki
    @nugenki 2 роки тому

    Video is put together so well. I didn't lose focus once

  • @RamiRouhana
    @RamiRouhana 2 роки тому

    Well done summary! thank you!

  • @XDSDDLord
    @XDSDDLord 2 роки тому

    I am incredibly glad I subscribed to you. Watching your videos require me to be in a certain mental "mood," but I never regret it when I click on one.

  • @stevesloan6775
    @stevesloan6775 2 роки тому

    Seriously need a part two to this video.

  • @myothersoul1953
    @myothersoul1953 2 роки тому

    Nice explanation, thank you.

  • @0rfinKing
    @0rfinKing Рік тому

    I love your PC setup. Great video btw!

  • @ZK-7
    @ZK-7 2 роки тому

    Thank you professor!

  • @yens
    @yens 2 роки тому

    one day i might understand more than half of the video, still heaps interesting. love ya work wesley

  • @tomassilva1642
    @tomassilva1642 2 роки тому

    Cool video! I would love to see more engineering videos like this

  • @meneermankepoot
    @meneermankepoot Рік тому

    That ad after you said you like monetization, goated

  • @jasonstatement3553
    @jasonstatement3553 Рік тому

    Great content, cheers man!

  • @brandonb6164
    @brandonb6164 2 роки тому

    Very nice video, I’ve been wondering about this for a while

  • @ChadOHara98
    @ChadOHara98 2 роки тому

    Thank you for this. Great explanation 👌

  • @saumyacow4435
    @saumyacow4435 2 роки тому +1

    Just noticed Godel, Escher, Bach on the bookshelf - one of my top 5 favourite books. A real classic.

  • @Cloxxki
    @Cloxxki 5 місяців тому

    With a budget, I'd do a track car project such:
    1 - ground effect maximizing false floor, think carbon, bit like in F1.
    2- It's mounted to the four wheel uprights, making it unsprung aero. Yes, unsprung mass, boohoo
    3- Light wheels, whatever they look like
    4- Chassis that holds payload and to which suspension is mounted.
    5- Shrink wrap body to minimise drag and have positive effect on downforce, depending on active aero shapes.

  • @alienfac32
    @alienfac32 2 роки тому

    Thank you for the explanation.

  • @BitcoinIsGoingToZero
    @BitcoinIsGoingToZero Рік тому

    Love that you have Godel Escher Bach on display. Wonderful.

  • @low.healthpoints
    @low.healthpoints Рік тому

    bro just by watching a frame of your content i know i must suscribe, that deltron 3030 walpapper, the pc on the wall ufff based

  • @MrManbearpigs
    @MrManbearpigs 2 роки тому

    incredible content, thank you

  • @logansuffredini7962
    @logansuffredini7962 2 роки тому

    Love that you showed ASUs website, forks up!

  • @Talynen
    @Talynen 2 роки тому

    Fascinating! Thanks for sharing.

  • @MrMalthusMusic
    @MrMalthusMusic 2 роки тому

    Highly enlightening, your explanations are concise and easily comprehended. You have inspired me to try out these features in F360. More videos of this nature please!

  • @PeakTorque
    @PeakTorque Рік тому

    Great and engaging video my man.

  • @doctorPaule
    @doctorPaule Рік тому +1

    Cool wall computer! Maybe my next computer can be cool like that. Thanks for explaining the math and history behind the weird shapes.

  • @J.E.C
    @J.E.C 2 роки тому

    Nice choice of wallpaper there on the right monitor!

  • @ethanmye-rs
    @ethanmye-rs 2 роки тому +2

    GEB is as such a cool book! Thanks for the video!

  • @lt1eg6
    @lt1eg6 Рік тому +1

    928 and Deltron 3030! Awesome and informative content. What more could one ask for!

  • @alish2001
    @alish2001 2 роки тому

    I don't know how I found this channel. I'm studying engineering but none of the "real" engineering stuff rather software engineering but this was so interesting and I was glued to my seat the entire time.

  • @undersky596
    @undersky596 2 роки тому +1

    This was a really excellent video thank you so much for sharing your knowledge.
    I'm an artist interested in hard surface design and trying to understand how to make concept designs with optimised topology look convincing has been something troubling me latley.

  • @TrippyEverythingVisuals
    @TrippyEverythingVisuals Рік тому

    fantastic video! subscribed.

  • @KwnDonoghue
    @KwnDonoghue 2 роки тому

    Mate what a great video. Keep it up!

  • @joshglynn8587
    @joshglynn8587 2 роки тому

    Awesome work, makes me want to design stuff!

  • @Nirinium
    @Nirinium 2 роки тому

    Dude your videos are amazing 👏

  • @DanGrab
    @DanGrab 2 роки тому

    I looked it up the blood pressure thing and ooooooooooh boy, am I glad someone figured out a better method.

  • @GusTheWolfgang
    @GusTheWolfgang 2 роки тому

    Wonderful video. Ill be watching more of your content

  • @Patrick_Cashman
    @Patrick_Cashman 2 роки тому

    Excellent video. Well done.

  • @scootergem
    @scootergem 2 роки тому

    Educational, I liked this!

  • @Jobobn1998
    @Jobobn1998 2 роки тому

    Just found this channel, and I honestly don't know what its main focus is, but I did definitely like this video!

  • @auvokuustio
    @auvokuustio 2 роки тому

    Very nice lecture of history and other nice things as well, I like!

  • @WildEngineering
    @WildEngineering 2 роки тому

    love your videos man, your channel has ballooned. :)

  • @egoworks5611
    @egoworks5611 2 роки тому

    great video man, ty

  • @OutsiderMoonie
    @OutsiderMoonie 2 роки тому

    Nice wall mounted PC!! Ive never seen one before now lol now I want one!

  • @galaxeon797
    @galaxeon797 Рік тому

    I'm not an engineer, but interested in cars and bikes. And I want to thank you for such a compact and surely a lot simplificated explanation of topology optimisation! This is awesome and what is peculiar about it is that it looks so bio and close to something created by nature) Cool! Big up and sub! Thank you giving content that internet was originally made for)