One of the best explanations i have heard so far on Qadhf and the issues related to ibn Hadi. May Allah guide Mohammad bin Hadi to the truth and may He preserve the Salafi scholars upon khair.
Thus is one of the Soofiyyah-Haddadiyyah people called the Sa'afiqah secret cult. They know nothing than to blindfollow personality and to speak ill of scholars. If what Muneer As-Sa'fooq said now about Qadhf is what you see as the best explanation then what have based your stance on since how many years ago that you have been speaking ill of a great scholar? Secondly, you are telling us that the courts in the land of Tawheed don't know what they have judged regarding the matter. When it is clear they judge with the qur’an and sunnah. You better repent and stop blindfollowership.
this is also simplify your seat in hell are you going to be asked abu shaykh ibn hadi when you get raised? the flesh of the scholars is poisen for you please dontt start using arabic words when you dont know any arabic
May Allaah reward Shaykh Sa’dee, very beneficial clarification, especially the last part he mentioned. This fitnah has already been clarified by our senior scholars al-hamdulilaah
Which type of salafiyyah you people are practicing??? I am sure it is not the salafiyyah of the RosooliLLAH. It is Soofiyyah-Haddadiyyah. Which ruling does the sharee'ah approves to accept in matters relating to court case, is it the ruling of the senior scholars who are not among the judges or the judges??? May Allāh guide you people to the right path.
@@kamaldeenabuyasir1873 You are digressing and not answering. In this matter the senior scholars are right. Ibn haadi made clear Qadhf (by calling someone 'aahir) and we have yet to see his proof. Show me where Shaykh Rabee' and Shaykh al-Fawzaan said what you said they said, I saw someome saying the same that Shaykh Rabee' said whoever doesnt accept the hukm of the judges then he has left Salafiyyah. Show me where he said this. Also, have you forgotten when ibn Haadi started slandering the scholars and students of knowledge like Shaykh al-Albaani and Shaykh 'Ubayd? If this is not Hizbiyyah, then tell me what it is.... Just because ibn Haadi will not get the Hadd does not mean that the one of the 7 destructive sins has been lifted from. We are yet to see proof for his Qadhf which the whole world heard
@@aiman7457 You are LIAR and deceiver. I have never digress but gave you the correct answer. If the senior scholars are correct like you said why have their statements not used to convict Sheikh Muhammad? If their statements have not been used it means they don't have say in matters relating to court case. Also, are judges in the whole court not from the senior scholars? Answer this and don't run away. Are the judges in both the appeal and Supreme Courts not judged with the book of Allāh and sunnah? Don't run away from this too, answer it. Lastly, you lied again that Sheikh Muhammad slandered Sheikh Ubayd and and Sheikh Albaany? Bring proofs for that. In contrast, it was Sheikh Abdullah Bukhari that slandered Sheikh Albaany. He said Sheikh Albaany did not know the fiqh of meeraath while there are Sheikh Albaany fataawah where he was explaining how to share the property of a deceased. Also, Sheikh Abdullah Bukhari said Sheikh Muqbil fell into the aqeedah of the Khawaarij. What would you say to this?
@@kamaldeenabuyasir1873 The court's ruling is between the Qadhif (Ibn Hadi) and the accused; the one upon whom Qadhf was made (Aby Ayyub), whether the accused wants the punishment (lashings) to be carried out on the Qadhif or not. It has nothing to do whether Ibn Hadi is free from Qadhf or not. Secondly, if you're so adamant on accepting the court's ruling, then why didn't you and your ilk accept the initial court ruling in which they found Ibn Hadi to be guilty. Were you and you're ilk being arrogant and stubborn back then?! Did you know more than the judges?! Thirdly, Shaykh Rabee' is an expert in the field of Jarh and Ta'deel (criticism and praise of individuals), those judges aren't. So he's more knowledgeable than them regarding this matter. He already made the ruling upon Ibn Hadi of being a Qadhif. And that is enough for the Salafis. As Allaah has told us to go to the people of Dhikr (knowledge) if we don't know. Fourthly, the judgement of the judges which the scholars refer to has to do with the rights of the individuals involved in the court case, meaning whatever they have decided for the defendant or the claimant is final. It's got nothing to with Jarh and Ta'deel. As mentioned before, Shaykh Rabee' - whether you like it or not - is specialised in the field of Jarh and Ta'deel and already ruled that Ibn Hadi is a Qadhif. May Allaah سبحانه و تعالى preserve Shaykh Rabee' and may the pretenders burn in their rage.
@@abumaalik9272 Now, the Jaahil claims to have knowledge of the Unseen. How do you know I haven't heard of him before the video?! Don't overdose, you've taken enough embarrassment already.
@@anonymoose9322 jaahil jaahil qadf abu khadija hadaddiya khadaab thats all this guys know kufr bida shirk kufar bida shirk have no fiqh with them dont even know tawheed just thinking that salafia is their dads property. salafi masjid is built in a unit next to a church these idiots think they are the four runners of salafia lmfaoooo
The question that should be answered is: is Muhammad bin Hadi spreading a Bid'ah? If not, then if this is true, it is a sinful matter and repentance is sought. But if this matter is used as animosity towards one another, then it becomes similar to those who divided amongst each after knowledge had reached them out of envy and enmity towards one another. Thus this is more about politics than about Deen. And the ruler should intervene and stop such differings. The evidence of that can be seen in this thread.
Between us and the Musa'afiqah: the Qur'aan, the Sunnah and the Salaf.. and none of them supports MBH's cause and all of them support him being flogged, not taken from anymore, being called a liar who carries one of the destructive sins etc. So the Musa'afiqah came with a new Manhaj regarding courts. New Manhaj with a new principle that they do not apply upon MBH when he rejected the first ruling of the same court.
I use to say it that the Sa'afiqah secret cult are ignoramuses, bigots and deceivers. If seeking for appeal in court is what you reffered to as rejection then that is ignorance. In the sharee'ah there's permission to appeal if one is not satisfied with a particular judgement. Sa'afiqah go and learn and stop being bigots and ignoramuses.
Do you even know the pillars, conditions and rights of word of at-tawheed. Saaf'iqah are Kharjites for rejecting Saudi Supreme Court's descision on Allamah As-Shaykh Mohammad Ibn Hadi Al Madkhali
@@ReturningBackToAl-Haqq Where did you get that principle from ? Which book ? What do you say about Salman al-Awdah being freed as well as Saalih al-Munajjid ? Do you say they are innocent because they got freed ?
Mun'ir As Sa'di thinking about which lies to make the Scholars look bad. He need to search up the Fatawa on Al Ahir. Shaykh Ibn Baaz, Shaykh Al Albani & Ibn Uthaymin disagreed with the Backbiting Hizb.
The Fitnah of this cult is largely over and Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Hadi حفظه الله has returned to us and started teaching. The cult cannot stand this so they increase their attacks on the Awliyah of Allah. There's a reason not a single member of this filthy hizb accepted the Mubahala challenge from either Sheikh Ibn Hadi حفظه الله or Sheikh Muzammil Faqeeri حفظه الله. They know they are liars
The Fitnah of this cult is largely over and Sheikh Muhammad lbn Hadi has returned to us and started teaching. The cult cannot stand this so they increase their attacks on the Awliyah of Allah. There's a reason not a single member of this filthy hizb accepted the Mubahala challenge from either Sheikh lbn Hadi or Sheikh Muzammil Faqeeri. They know they are liars. To top it all off, we have seen the videos of Spubs seniors threatening their members to attack those who defend Sheikh Ibn Hadi. Many people are scared to speak out against them due to their threats
The Fitnah of this cult is largely over and Sheikh Muhammad lbn Hadi has returned to us and started teaching. The cult cannot stand this so they increase their attacks on the Awliyah of Allah. There's a reason not a single member of this disgusting hizb accepted the Mubahala challenge from either Sheikh Ibn Hadi or Sheikh Muzammil Faqeeri. They know they are liars. To top it all off, we have seen the videos of Spubs seniors threatening their members to attack those who defend Sheikh Ibn Hadi. Many people are scared to speak out against them due to their threats.
really... the first thing mohammad ibn hadi tried to do in court is to prove his claim that abu ayyub is a 'ahir (fornicator) by bringing his "evidences" when his "evidences" were rejected by the court (btw none of you said this is a saudi court we should accept...) his supporters ran in every directions searching for fatawas from the scholars about the term fornicator "does it really mean what it means or..." homework for you : if he didn't mean that why did he try to prove that abu ayyub is a fornicator ?
@@kaassouffle2634 the messenger of Allah (peace and blessing be upon him) when explaining the saved sect said what I am upon and my companions are upon and we know that saved sect is the haqq so it is from Sunnah to say you’re upon the haqq
@@kaassouffle2634 Assalam aleykum wa rahmatuAllahi wa barakatuh Have more manners to correct your brothers, you will be arrogant who does not even bring proof and speak arrogantly, Allah does not love the arrogant. You don't even have the education to offer the greeting of peace and are you going to correct me? Shame on you. and yes, I am in the haqq, al hamdulillah because the evidence is with me. Any problem, arrogant gentleman who does not give the greeting of peace? Assalam aleykum wa rahmatuAllahi wa barakatuh z
@@kaassouffle2634The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "I guarantee an abode on the outskirts of Paradise to the one who renounces arguing even if he is right, an abode in the center of Paradise to the one who renounces lying even if it is a joke, and an abode to the highest of Paradise to those who have good manners" 📚 Abu Daud (4800)
@@kaassouffle2634 Council of Shaykh Al-Albaní (رحمه الله) «Advise people in the best way possible. Depart from rudeness and severity. Allah says: “Invite to the path of your Lord with wisdom, a beautiful exhortation and argue in the best way.” He says this because the truth is heavy. The ego refuses to accept it. If you add hardness of form to the heaviness of the truth, you scare people away instead of inviting them. And you all know the hadith in which the Messenger ﷺ said: “There are among you those who scare people away.” 🎧 Tasyilat mutafarriqa, track 20, Nasiha min al Shaykh Al-Albaní. You ⬆️
The usool that Muhammad bin Haadi (may Allah guide him to the truth) went against 1. Speaking against scholars 2. Waging war against salafees calling for split despite Sh Rabee advising him and Sh Ubayd rahimahullah but he ignored their advice. 3. Making tabdee' of salafees saying "layso salafiyeen" without sufficient evidence of tabdee' Add to that insulting people of sunnah with Sa'aafiqa (bankrupt) sad to see him go this low despite clear verses from the Quran against insulting Muslims let alone salafees! 5 ruling passed against him as being qadf but he kept on appealing until the 6th one said no lashes but not that he is innocent from reviling a Muslim in such an abhorrent way in a MASJID may Allah rectify him and us. IF THIS HAPPENED TO THEM THEY WONT BE SUPPORTING HIM. So I pray he returns to the truth since these are heavy BURDENS but his followers are blindly supporting this dhulm. They think matter is only qadf.
@@LLisaan.al-arabi1234هذول ما يعرفون شروط لا إله إلا الله اغلبهم جهلاء باللغة العربية و كبيرهم الصعفوق عبدالواحد لا يجيد تلاوة كتاب الله فلا تنتظر منهم شيئا و من جعل الغراب له دليلاً يحوف به على جيف الكلاب
Shameful brothers are still spreading this nonsense among the laymen with subtitled videos. Whatever happened to warding off the Hudood with doubts? As the term Ahir is not clear cut Qadfh and Ibn Baaz has a Fatwa on this. And the rulings of the court is not overruled by those 3 scholars mentioned and the Sharee'ah court and their ruling exonerating Shaykh Muhammad ibn Hadee should be respected. The Shaykh gave much of his time educating the Salafis in the West and is looked upon as a father figure by many but where is any level of respect? Leave these matters and focus on spreading actual knowledge and refuting the actual people of innovation who are more worthy of being brought down than one of our scholars who is not free from mistakes.
This shows how the spubs and co contradict themselves. The judgement in favour of sheikh Muhammad came from a Saudi court and we are ordered as believers to obey the ulu amr.
Do shaykh Rabee, shaykh Ubaid, shaykh Fawzan contradict themselves, or are you abandoning the major scholars? The court is something personal between bin hadi and the person. The qadhf is established upon bin hadi, as well as other vile speech in a mosque against the muslims. Stop trying to enter the markets without any money to spend.
@@SaidB1n you have completely ignored the verse in the Qur'an which says 'oh you who believe, obey Allah, obey the messenger, and those with who have authority amongst you'. His judgement came from a Saudi court, so we should accept the judgement and not going the court decision because it entails going against the ruler who gave the courts their authority. Don't speak with ignorance, or are you a hizbi?
And the scholars are part of those who are in authority. And as the Shaykh mentioned in the video that Shaykh Rabee', Shaykh 'Ubayd and Shaykh 'Abdullah al-Bukhari are more knowledgeable (or may be) regarding this affair than the judge who made the court decision. Secondly, your comment shows that you didn't watch the full video or failed to comprehend it, since the Shaykh clarified that the lashings have been waived, but as for the other things that follow from Qadhf still remain, and the Shaykh gave proofs and evidence from the Kitaab and the Sunnah. And also that the matter regarding Ibn Hadi is not just restricted to his Qadhf, but also his splitting of the ranks of the Salafis, and his slander of the aformentioned Shuyookh. And Allaah knows best.
@@anonymoose9322 this is clear misuse of the texts. Being a teacher isn't authority, are they qudat, or apart of hayat kibaar Ulema? Do they have a position given to them by the government? As for saying hadd is dropped by everything else remains, if the matter has gone before an Islamic judge and he makes a ruling then the speech of any other person is irrelevant. As for the in the akhirah that is the only thing that remains. As for splitting the ranks of the salafis it's very clear spubs and co have ever small list of scholars they take from becoming more and more isolated like a cult.
@@abumaalik9272 Where did you come up with these principles? Who preceded you in this? The Tafaaseer clearly state that Ulul 'Amr are the rulers and scholars. Provide evidence for the specifications you mentioned or keep silent. Shaykh Rabee' made the ruling on Ibn Hadi even before the court, and he is from the scholars of Jarh and Ta'deel, so it doesn't matter what the court ruled. We don't need courts regarding such matters. For the Salafi, the ruling of the scholar is enough. We don't need to wait for the ruling of the court. It's the person upon whom the Qadhf was done, who waits for the court ruling, in order to take his right.
Daniel haqiqatjou is American scholar and he accuses chaste Muslim women and everyone loves Daniel and does not refute him in this matter and says he is correct. Daniel said that Muslim woman are hiding their cheating from husband and nobody said it is wrong so why we must take harsh approach to Muhammad Bin Hadi?
Akhi, I advise myself and you to study the Deen. No one has ever called Daniel a scholar except an ignoramous. He is far from being a scholar, he's not even a student of knowledge. May Allaah bless you. He's a misguided Jaahil, misguiding others. Don't lump him with this matter. His and Ibn Hadi's matters are two completely different matters, and should be treated separately.
Daniel has made takfir on 15 Salafi scholars so far and the only ones that called Daniel a scholar are Dilly Hussain and Abdullah Andalusi who are themselves both jahils
Just because the lashes were lifted does not mean he’s free from his sins, the judge is not the proof. Quran and Sunnah are the proofs and Quran and Sunnah are still against him. He still hasn’t repented yet nor brought proofs for accusations of zina
@@إيادأبوعبدالرحمنif it’s about taking the ruling then why do you reject the first ruling? And Quran and Sunnah are still against him. A judge is not a proof, Quran and Sunnah are the proofs and if you say a judge is proof then the first one was correct and second one is wrong because quran and Sunnah are still against him. You people have no legs to stand on
The fact that Shaykh Rabee', Shaykh 'Ubayd and Shaykh 'Abdullah al-Bukhari spoke about this matter - who are from the senior scholars - is enough for us.
@@humzanadeem4512 Are those senior scholars lying? Do you think those scholars are just talking randomly without any evidence? Do you think those senior scholars will refute someone without any justice?!
@@anonymoose9322Scholars are not infalliable akhi. A scholar making a mistake is perfectly normal, for if they do they recieve 1 reward. It’s especially important to not take biased stances between scholars. (Shaykh M ibn Hadi was considered a scholar by Shaykh R ibn Hadi and Shaykh U al Jabiri). When it comes to the Jarh of a person, unless the evidence is presented and is CLEAR CUT, it should not be accepted, the statement of a scholar is not a evidence in the Shariah. Allah knows best
@@aralsomali You failed to understand the point being made. As for the audio where Ibn Hadi made Qadhf, you can Google "The Moment Has Come For Muhammad Ibn Hadi To Break His Silence 1" on Google or UA-cam. The video is about 52 minutes, and the specific point at which he made Qadhf is at the 25th minute of the video.
هذا الشيخ لا يدري ما يقول والله المستعان، فهو يدافع عن شخص لا يعرفه أصلا وقال عنه أنه عفيف ، كيف عرف ذلك والشخص المنعوت يقيم في هولندا ومعروف عندنا ،فكيف لهذا الشيخ أن يدافع عن شخص مجهول عنده ويطعن في شيخ جليل معروف القدر والمنزلة وبرأته المحكمة العليا من تهمتكم؟؟؟ والله إنه التعصب والطعن من أجل الطعن لا غير. فاحذروا معشر الشباب أن تقعوا في لحوم العلماء فإنها مسمومة .
The shaykh حفظه الله was innocent in court, shaykh fawzan recently phoned him, shaykh wasiullah was happy with him being proven innocent, the shaykh began teaching again literally a few days ago held a massive conference in Makkah which so many students of knowledge attended, but you (SPUBS members) still want to continue this cowardice of talking about Shaykh Mohammad bin hadi every other day. May Allah عز وجل forgive us all.
@@aerobyte89 Was anything wrong said? Search the article "Dr Wasiyullāh Abbās: his call for cooperation with Ahlul-Bid’ah and his recommendation and support for Zakir Naik " by Shaykh Abu Khadeejah حفظه الله.
Assalam aleykum wa rahmatuAllahi wa barakatuh. You lie on All. 1. Muhammad ibn hadi is a Qadifh Thats whats Allah aza wajall says on HER book. 2. He call to the division. Thats broke the fundaments of Ahlul wal jama’a. 3. He denigres the Ullaamah kaabir and do ghiba namima… etc I see you put on 1 the tribunal, and forget the Quraan….. thats from the Ppl of misgance. 4. Sheikh RABEE sheikh JABIRI talks sooo good about SPUBS. you know more than the Ullaamah? Subhanallah! Fear Allah and talk with evidences, and dont cause confusión between the salafiyyuun. Dont follow your desires. Sheikh al fawzan also refuted MBH Sheikh rabee Sheikh Ubayd al jabiri Sheikh abdullah al bukhari And more. You forget ? Rememeber. May Allah guide u.
والله أنتم مرضى القلوب ، فاسألوا الله الشفاء قبل فوات الأوان. قولوا: اللهم رب الناس أذهب البأس اشف أنت الشافي لا شفاء إلا شفاؤك شفاء لا يغادر سقما. شفاكم الله وعافاكم من هذا المرض الخطير ألا وهو الغل والحقد والحسد والبعض.
Have you ever seen how little kiddie street gangs operate? Pretty much the same thing. Just a bunch of little kids on both sides with nothing better to do.
@@abaibraheemone has daleel and want to defend the sunnah and salafiyyah the other has no proofs and wants to split it Would you say the same thing to ibn ‘Abbas رضي الله عنه when he went to the khawaarij? That they have nothing better to do? Defending the sunnah is considered to be from the actions of people who have nothing to do? لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله
Bin hadi has greatly oppressed many muslims, among them well known scholars and students. He called them with evil names, without any evidence. Rather he said "the evidence will come...", so he made the accusations before he had any proof. He commanded his followers to boycot these scholars and treated them like evil innovators. Without any proof. Furthermore, he accused a muslim of being a fornicator(!), alcoholist, fasiq, and what more, again without any evidence. The major scholars (Rabee, Ubaid, Fawzaan), much more knowledgeable than bin hadi, established that he is a Qaadhif (an accuser of fornication without proof). Major scholars commanded that he is to be abandoned until he makes tawbah. The Quran actually commands that we abandon a Qaadhif and not take from him.
Everything is explained in the video, Alhamdulillaah. If you don't have enough attention span to watch a 13-minute video, then don't concern yourself with something that doesn't concern you. Baarakallaahu feekum.
One of the best explanations i have heard so far on Qadhf and the issues related to ibn Hadi. May Allah guide Mohammad bin Hadi to the truth and may He preserve the Salafi scholars upon khair.
Aameen.
Thus is one of the Soofiyyah-Haddadiyyah people called the Sa'afiqah secret cult. They know nothing than to blindfollow personality and to speak ill of scholars.
If what Muneer As-Sa'fooq said now about Qadhf is what you see as the best explanation then what have based your stance on since how many years ago that you have been speaking ill of a great scholar?
Secondly, you are telling us that the courts in the land of Tawheed don't know what they have judged regarding the matter. When it is clear they judge with the qur’an and sunnah.
You better repent and stop blindfollowership.
may Allah guide you ya miskeen
@@GilesHartop Aameen and you too.
Indeed everyone requires Allah's guidance and I am really a miskeen.
@@intekabalam7340 you dont even know what purification is yet your talking about gadhf
بارك الله فيك
This simplifies the issue for those who are new to the matter or were not in the da'wah at the time of the fitnah
this is also simplify your seat in hell are you going to be asked abu shaykh ibn hadi when you get raised?
the flesh of the scholars is poisen for you please dontt start using arabic words when you dont know any arabic
I benefitted from this speech. May Allah make us remember him and fear him, during our time in this dunya.
May Allaah reward Shaykh Sa’dee, very beneficial clarification, especially the last part he mentioned. This fitnah has already been clarified by our senior scholars al-hamdulilaah
Which type of salafiyyah you people are practicing??? I am sure it is not the salafiyyah of the RosooliLLAH. It is Soofiyyah-Haddadiyyah.
Which ruling does the sharee'ah approves to accept in matters relating to court case, is it the ruling of the senior scholars who are not among the judges or the judges???
May Allāh guide you people to the right path.
@@kamaldeenabuyasir1873The senior scholars are more knowledgeable than the judges
@@kamaldeenabuyasir1873 You are digressing and not answering. In this matter the senior scholars are right. Ibn haadi made clear Qadhf (by calling someone 'aahir) and we have yet to see his proof. Show me where Shaykh Rabee' and Shaykh al-Fawzaan said what you said they said, I saw someome saying the same that Shaykh Rabee' said whoever doesnt accept the hukm of the judges then he has left Salafiyyah. Show me where he said this. Also, have you forgotten when ibn Haadi started slandering the scholars and students of knowledge like Shaykh al-Albaani and Shaykh 'Ubayd? If this is not Hizbiyyah, then tell me what it is....
Just because ibn Haadi will not get the Hadd does not mean that the one of the 7 destructive sins has been lifted from. We are yet to see proof for his Qadhf which the whole world heard
@@aiman7457
You are LIAR and deceiver.
I have never digress but gave you the correct answer.
If the senior scholars are correct like you said why have their statements not used to convict Sheikh Muhammad? If their statements have not been used it means they don't have say in matters relating to court case.
Also, are judges in the whole court not from the senior scholars? Answer this and don't run away.
Are the judges in both the appeal and Supreme Courts not judged with the book of Allāh and sunnah? Don't run away from this too, answer it.
Lastly, you lied again that Sheikh Muhammad slandered Sheikh Ubayd and and Sheikh Albaany? Bring proofs for that.
In contrast, it was Sheikh Abdullah Bukhari that slandered Sheikh Albaany. He said Sheikh Albaany did not know the fiqh of meeraath while there are Sheikh Albaany fataawah where he was explaining how to share the property of a deceased.
Also, Sheikh Abdullah Bukhari said Sheikh Muqbil fell into the aqeedah of the Khawaarij.
What would you say to this?
@@kamaldeenabuyasir1873
The court's ruling is between the Qadhif (Ibn Hadi) and the accused; the one upon whom Qadhf was made (Aby Ayyub), whether the accused wants the punishment (lashings) to be carried out on the Qadhif or not. It has nothing to do whether Ibn Hadi is free from Qadhf or not.
Secondly, if you're so adamant on accepting the court's ruling, then why didn't you and your ilk accept the initial court ruling in which they found Ibn Hadi to be guilty. Were you and you're ilk being arrogant and stubborn back then?! Did you know more than the judges?!
Thirdly, Shaykh Rabee' is an expert in the field of Jarh and Ta'deel (criticism and praise of individuals), those judges aren't. So he's more knowledgeable than them regarding this matter. He already made the ruling upon Ibn Hadi of being a Qadhif. And that is enough for the Salafis. As Allaah has told us to go to the people of Dhikr (knowledge) if we don't know.
Fourthly, the judgement of the judges which the scholars refer to has to do with the rights of the individuals involved in the court case, meaning whatever they have decided for the defendant or the claimant is final. It's got nothing to with Jarh and Ta'deel. As mentioned before, Shaykh Rabee' - whether you like it or not - is specialised in the field of Jarh and Ta'deel and already ruled that Ibn Hadi is a Qadhif.
May Allaah سبحانه و تعالى preserve Shaykh Rabee' and may the pretenders burn in their rage.
أحسن الله إليكم
جزاكم الله خيرا
The Shaykh حفظه الله made everything clear, Alhamdulillaah.
You've not even heard of the sheikh before this video, have you even come to Egypt before ya Majhul?
@@abumaalik9272
Now, the Jaahil claims to have knowledge of the Unseen. How do you know I haven't heard of him before the video?! Don't overdose, you've taken enough embarrassment already.
Yes I am questioning because when one person is dropped another unknown is lifted.
@@anonymoose9322 jaahil jaahil qadf abu khadija hadaddiya khadaab
thats all this guys know kufr bida shirk kufar bida shirk
have no fiqh with them dont even know tawheed just thinking that salafia is their dads property.
salafi masjid is built in a unit next to a church these idiots think they are the four runners of salafia lmfaoooo
The question that should be answered is: is Muhammad bin Hadi spreading a Bid'ah? If not, then if this is true, it is a sinful matter and repentance is sought. But if this matter is used as animosity towards one another, then it becomes similar to those who divided amongst each after knowledge had reached them out of envy and enmity towards one another. Thus this is more about politics than about Deen. And the ruler should intervene and stop such differings. The evidence of that can be seen in this thread.
Between us and the Musa'afiqah: the Qur'aan, the Sunnah and the Salaf.. and none of them supports MBH's cause and all of them support him being flogged, not taken from anymore, being called a liar who carries one of the destructive sins etc.
So the Musa'afiqah came with a new Manhaj regarding courts. New Manhaj with a new principle that they do not apply upon MBH when he rejected the first ruling of the same court.
I use to say it that the Sa'afiqah secret cult are ignoramuses, bigots and deceivers.
If seeking for appeal in court is what you reffered to as rejection then that is ignorance. In the sharee'ah there's permission to appeal if one is not satisfied with a particular judgement.
Sa'afiqah go and learn and stop being bigots and ignoramuses.
Thats correct. ALLAHUMA BARIK.
Do you even know the pillars, conditions and rights of word of at-tawheed.
Saaf'iqah are Kharjites for rejecting Saudi Supreme Court's descision on Allamah As-Shaykh Mohammad Ibn Hadi Al Madkhali
@@ReturningBackToAl-Haqq Where did you get that principle from ? Which book ? What do you say about Salman al-Awdah being freed as well as Saalih al-Munajjid ? Do you say they are innocent because they got freed ?
@@ReturningBackToAl-Haqq So MBH was also a Khaariji for opposing the first ruling of the supreme court right ? Musa'afiqah are self-contradictory.
Hafidhahullah. BarakAllahu Feekum
جزاك الله خيرا وبارك الله فيك
Mun'ir As Sa'di thinking about which lies to make the Scholars look bad.
He need to search up the Fatawa on Al Ahir.
Shaykh Ibn Baaz, Shaykh Al Albani & Ibn Uthaymin disagreed with the Backbiting Hizb.
The Fitnah of this cult is largely over and Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Hadi حفظه الله has returned to us and started teaching. The cult cannot stand this so they increase their attacks on the Awliyah of Allah. There's a reason not a single member of this filthy hizb accepted the Mubahala challenge from either Sheikh Ibn Hadi حفظه الله or Sheikh Muzammil Faqeeri حفظه الله. They know they are liars
The Fitnah of this cult is largely over and Sheikh Muhammad lbn Hadi has returned to us and started teaching. The cult cannot stand this so they increase their
attacks on the Awliyah of Allah. There's a reason not a single member of this filthy hizb accepted the Mubahala challenge from either Sheikh lbn Hadi or Sheikh Muzammil Faqeeri. They know they are liars. To top it all off, we have seen the videos of Spubs seniors threatening their members to attack those who defend Sheikh Ibn Hadi. Many people are scared to speak out against them due to their threats
The Fitnah of this cult is largely over and
Sheikh Muhammad lbn Hadi has returned to
us and started teaching. The cult cannot stand this so they increase their
attacks on the Awliyah of Allah. There's a reason not a single member of this disgusting hizb accepted the Mubahala challenge from either Sheikh Ibn Hadi or Sheikh Muzammil Faqeeri. They know they are liars. To top it all off, we have seen the videos of Spubs seniors threatening their members to attack those who defend Sheikh Ibn Hadi. Many people are scared to speak out against them due to their threats.
really... the first thing mohammad ibn hadi tried to do in court is to prove his claim that abu ayyub is a 'ahir (fornicator) by bringing his "evidences"
when his "evidences" were rejected by the court (btw none of you said this is a saudi court we should accept...) his supporters ran in every directions searching for fatawas from the scholars about the term fornicator "does it really mean what it means or..."
homework for you :
if he didn't mean that why did he try to prove that abu ayyub is a fornicator ?
@@DardanIdrizajwhere is the evidence of Muhammad bin Hadi tryung to prove fornication...
Who is the guy?
His name is in the beginning of the title of this video. Shaikh Muneer Al-Sadi (hafidhahullah).
He is unknown
@@armanhabib1173 the shaikh also runs a masjid and school in Aden, Yemen.
A nightmare for the Musa'afiqah.
@@armanhabib1173who is he where did he studied who of the major scholars recommend him ?
ALLAHUMA BARIK. May الله keep us firm on Haqq. Jazakallah khair!
@@kaassouffle2634 the messenger of Allah (peace and blessing be upon him) when explaining the saved sect said what I am upon and my companions are upon and we know that saved sect is the haqq so it is from Sunnah to say you’re upon the haqq
@@kaassouffle2634 look at you struggle, since being a sunni is being upon haqq. Now are you going to say we shouldn’t call ourselves Sunnis?
@@kaassouffle2634 Assalam aleykum wa rahmatuAllahi wa barakatuh Have more manners to correct your brothers, you will be arrogant who does not even bring proof and speak arrogantly, Allah does not love the arrogant.
You don't even have the education to offer the greeting of peace and are you going to correct me?
Shame on you.
and yes, I am in the haqq, al hamdulillah because the evidence is with me.
Any problem, arrogant gentleman who does not give the greeting of peace?
Assalam aleykum wa rahmatuAllahi wa barakatuh z
@@kaassouffle2634The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: "I guarantee an abode on the outskirts of Paradise to the one who renounces arguing even if he is right, an abode in the center of Paradise to the one who renounces lying even if it is a joke, and an abode to the highest of Paradise to those who have good manners"
📚 Abu Daud (4800)
@@kaassouffle2634 Council of Shaykh Al-Albaní (رحمه الله)
«Advise people in the best way possible. Depart from rudeness and severity. Allah says: “Invite to the path of your Lord with wisdom, a beautiful exhortation and argue in the best way.” He says this because the truth is heavy.
The ego refuses to accept it. If you add hardness of form to the heaviness of the truth, you scare people away instead of inviting them.
And you all know the hadith in which the Messenger ﷺ said:
“There are among you those who scare people away.”
🎧 Tasyilat mutafarriqa, track 20, Nasiha min al Shaykh Al-Albaní.
You ⬆️
The usool that Muhammad bin Haadi (may Allah guide him to the truth) went against
1. Speaking against scholars
2. Waging war against salafees calling for split despite Sh Rabee advising him and Sh Ubayd rahimahullah but he ignored their advice.
3. Making tabdee' of salafees saying "layso salafiyeen" without sufficient evidence of tabdee'
Add to that insulting people of sunnah with Sa'aafiqa (bankrupt) sad to see him go this low despite clear verses from the Quran against insulting Muslims let alone salafees!
5 ruling passed against him as being qadf but he kept on appealing until the 6th one said no lashes but not that he is innocent from reviling a Muslim in such an abhorrent way in a MASJID may Allah rectify him and us.
IF THIS HAPPENED TO THEM THEY WONT BE SUPPORTING HIM.
So I pray he returns to the truth since these are heavy BURDENS but his followers are blindly supporting this dhulm. They think matter is only qadf.
هل تفقه العربية؟
@@LLisaan.al-arabi1234هذول ما يعرفون شروط لا إله إلا الله اغلبهم جهلاء باللغة العربية و كبيرهم الصعفوق عبدالواحد لا يجيد تلاوة كتاب الله فلا تنتظر منهم شيئا
و من جعل الغراب له دليلاً يحوف به على جيف الكلاب
is he talking about Muhammad bin hadi al madkhali?
Yes
Shameful brothers are still spreading this nonsense among the laymen with subtitled videos. Whatever happened to warding off the Hudood with doubts? As the term Ahir is not clear cut Qadfh and Ibn Baaz has a Fatwa on this. And the rulings of the court is not overruled by those 3 scholars mentioned and the Sharee'ah court and their ruling exonerating Shaykh Muhammad ibn Hadee should be respected. The Shaykh gave much of his time educating the Salafis in the West and is looked upon as a father figure by many but where is any level of respect? Leave these matters and focus on spreading actual knowledge and refuting the actual people of innovation who are more worthy of being brought down than one of our scholars who is not free from mistakes.
BarakAllahu feekum akhi 🧡
This shows how the spubs and co contradict themselves. The judgement in favour of sheikh Muhammad came from a Saudi court and we are ordered as believers to obey the ulu amr.
Do shaykh Rabee, shaykh Ubaid, shaykh Fawzan contradict themselves, or are you abandoning the major scholars? The court is something personal between bin hadi and the person. The qadhf is established upon bin hadi, as well as other vile speech in a mosque against the muslims. Stop trying to enter the markets without any money to spend.
@@SaidB1n you have completely ignored the verse in the Qur'an which says 'oh you who believe, obey Allah, obey the messenger, and those with who have authority amongst you'. His judgement came from a Saudi court, so we should accept the judgement and not going the court decision because it entails going against the ruler who gave the courts their authority. Don't speak with ignorance, or are you a hizbi?
And the scholars are part of those who are in authority. And as the Shaykh mentioned in the video that Shaykh Rabee', Shaykh 'Ubayd and Shaykh 'Abdullah al-Bukhari are more knowledgeable (or may be) regarding this affair than the judge who made the court decision. Secondly, your comment shows that you didn't watch the full video or failed to comprehend it, since the Shaykh clarified that the lashings have been waived, but as for the other things that follow from Qadhf still remain, and the Shaykh gave proofs and evidence from the Kitaab and the Sunnah. And also that the matter regarding Ibn Hadi is not just restricted to his Qadhf, but also his splitting of the ranks of the Salafis, and his slander of the aformentioned Shuyookh. And Allaah knows best.
@@anonymoose9322 this is clear misuse of the texts. Being a teacher isn't authority, are they qudat, or apart of hayat kibaar Ulema? Do they have a position given to them by the government? As for saying hadd is dropped by everything else remains, if the matter has gone before an Islamic judge and he makes a ruling then the speech of any other person is irrelevant. As for the in the akhirah that is the only thing that remains. As for splitting the ranks of the salafis it's very clear spubs and co have ever small list of scholars they take from becoming more and more isolated like a cult.
@@abumaalik9272 Where did you come up with these principles? Who preceded you in this? The Tafaaseer clearly state that Ulul 'Amr are the rulers and scholars. Provide evidence for the specifications you mentioned or keep silent.
Shaykh Rabee' made the ruling on Ibn Hadi even before the court, and he is from the scholars of Jarh and Ta'deel, so it doesn't matter what the court ruled. We don't need courts regarding such matters.
For the Salafi, the ruling of the scholar is enough. We don't need to wait for the ruling of the court. It's the person upon whom the Qadhf was done, who waits for the court ruling, in order to take his right.
Brother do video of bilal abu hakeem davis sharing the stage with sufis, mixing with them shaking their hands. In shaa Allah
مساكين أنتم والله، تركتم العلم النافع واشتغلتم بالعلماء، وصدق رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم حيث قال: " حدثاء الأسنان سفهاء الأحلام".
سبحان الله
Daniel haqiqatjou is American scholar and he accuses chaste Muslim women and everyone loves Daniel and does not refute him in this matter and says he is correct. Daniel said that Muslim woman are hiding their cheating from husband and nobody said it is wrong so why we must take harsh approach to Muhammad Bin Hadi?
Akhi, I advise myself and you to study the Deen. No one has ever called Daniel a scholar except an ignoramous. He is far from being a scholar, he's not even a student of knowledge. May Allaah bless you. He's a misguided Jaahil, misguiding others. Don't lump him with this matter. His and Ibn Hadi's matters are two completely different matters, and should be treated separately.
Daniel has made takfir on 15 Salafi scholars so far and the only ones that called Daniel a scholar are Dilly Hussain and Abdullah Andalusi who are themselves both jahils
ما الفائدة من نشر هذا المقطع الله المستعان وقد برؤوا الشيخ من هذه التهمة ؟
Just because the lashes were lifted does not mean he’s free from his sins, the judge is not the proof. Quran and Sunnah are the proofs and Quran and Sunnah are still against him. He still hasn’t repented yet nor brought proofs for accusations of zina
@@Randomhandlename do you mean the judges in Saudi Arabia may Allah protect
Don’t judging with Islamic Shariaa !!!!
@@إيادأبوعبدالرحمن are you saying the judges in the first verdict didn’t judge with Islamic shariah?
@@Randomhandlenameأنا أظن ان القضاة في المملكة العربية السعودية يحكمون بالشريعة والمهم ان الحكم الأخير فيه تبرئة الشيخ وانتهى الأمر
@@إيادأبوعبدالرحمنif it’s about taking the ruling then why do you reject the first ruling? And Quran and Sunnah are still against him. A judge is not a proof, Quran and Sunnah are the proofs and if you say a judge is proof then the first one was correct and second one is wrong because quran and Sunnah are still against him. You people have no legs to stand on
All of these accusations' but where is the proof and evidence? I don't want he said she said.
The fact that Shaykh Rabee', Shaykh 'Ubayd and Shaykh 'Abdullah al-Bukhari spoke about this matter - who are from the senior scholars - is enough for us.
@@anonymoose9322 No its not, Jarh is not accepted except with evidence
@@humzanadeem4512
Are those senior scholars lying? Do you think those scholars are just talking randomly without any evidence? Do you think those senior scholars will refute someone without any justice?!
@@anonymoose9322Scholars are not infalliable akhi. A scholar making a mistake is perfectly normal, for if they do they recieve 1 reward. It’s especially important to not take biased stances between scholars. (Shaykh M ibn Hadi was considered a scholar by Shaykh R ibn Hadi and Shaykh U al Jabiri). When it comes to the Jarh of a person, unless the evidence is presented and is CLEAR CUT, it should not be accepted, the statement of a scholar is not a evidence in the Shariah. Allah knows best
@@aralsomali
You failed to understand the point being made. As for the audio where Ibn Hadi made Qadhf, you can Google "The Moment Has Come For Muhammad Ibn Hadi To Break His Silence 1" on Google or UA-cam. The video is about 52 minutes, and the specific point at which he made Qadhf is at the 25th minute of the video.
هذا الشيخ لا يدري ما يقول والله المستعان، فهو يدافع عن شخص لا يعرفه أصلا وقال عنه أنه عفيف ، كيف عرف ذلك والشخص المنعوت يقيم في هولندا ومعروف عندنا ،فكيف لهذا الشيخ أن يدافع عن شخص مجهول عنده ويطعن في شيخ جليل معروف القدر والمنزلة وبرأته المحكمة العليا من تهمتكم؟؟؟
والله إنه التعصب والطعن من أجل الطعن لا غير.
فاحذروا معشر الشباب أن تقعوا في لحوم العلماء فإنها مسمومة .
The shaykh حفظه الله was innocent in court, shaykh fawzan recently phoned him, shaykh wasiullah was happy with him being proven innocent, the shaykh began teaching again literally a few days ago held a massive conference in Makkah which so many students of knowledge attended, but you (SPUBS members) still want to continue this cowardice of talking about Shaykh Mohammad bin hadi every other day.
May Allah عز وجل forgive us all.
@@anonymoose9322you should fear Allah little man
@@aerobyte89
Was anything wrong said? Search the article "Dr Wasiyullāh Abbās: his call for cooperation with Ahlul-Bid’ah and his recommendation and support for Zakir Naik " by Shaykh Abu Khadeejah حفظه الله.
Assalam aleykum wa rahmatuAllahi wa barakatuh. You lie on All.
1. Muhammad ibn hadi is a Qadifh
Thats whats Allah aza wajall says on HER book.
2. He call to the division.
Thats broke the fundaments of Ahlul
wal jama’a.
3. He denigres the Ullaamah kaabir and do ghiba namima… etc
I see you put on 1 the tribunal, and forget the Quraan…..
thats from the Ppl of misgance.
4. Sheikh RABEE sheikh JABIRI talks sooo good about SPUBS. you know more than the Ullaamah? Subhanallah!
Fear Allah and talk with evidences, and dont cause confusión between the salafiyyuun.
Dont follow your desires.
Sheikh al fawzan also refuted MBH
Sheikh rabee
Sheikh Ubayd al jabiri
Sheikh abdullah al bukhari
And more.
You forget ? Rememeber.
May Allah guide u.
@@abdulwadood.8 the quran is CLEAR. Allah guides me. I can say the same of you…..
your sick and you don't follow the truth but just men fear Allah What's the proof for his accusations Tell me no evidence !!
Anyone got any evidence of the ruling from the court
والله أنتم مرضى القلوب ، فاسألوا الله الشفاء قبل فوات الأوان.
قولوا: اللهم رب الناس أذهب البأس اشف أنت الشافي لا شفاء إلا شفاؤك شفاء لا يغادر سقما.
شفاكم الله وعافاكم من هذا المرض الخطير ألا وهو الغل والحقد والحسد والبعض.
Can someone in a simple paragraph explain what happened to Muhammad Bin Hadi and why he is no longer taken from?
Have you ever seen how little kiddie street gangs operate? Pretty much the same thing. Just a bunch of little kids on both sides with nothing better to do.
@@abaibraheem 100%
@@abaibraheemone has daleel and want to defend the sunnah and salafiyyah the other has no proofs and wants to split it
Would you say the same thing to ibn ‘Abbas رضي الله عنه when he went to the khawaarij? That they have nothing better to do? Defending the sunnah is considered to be from the actions of people who have nothing to do? لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله
Bin hadi has greatly oppressed many muslims, among them well known scholars and students. He called them with evil names, without any evidence. Rather he said "the evidence will come...", so he made the accusations before he had any proof. He commanded his followers to boycot these scholars and treated them like evil innovators. Without any proof.
Furthermore, he accused a muslim of being a fornicator(!), alcoholist, fasiq, and what more, again without any evidence. The major scholars (Rabee, Ubaid, Fawzaan), much more knowledgeable than bin hadi, established that he is a Qaadhif (an accuser of fornication without proof).
Major scholars commanded that he is to be abandoned until he makes tawbah. The Quran actually commands that we abandon a Qaadhif and not take from him.
Everything is explained in the video, Alhamdulillaah. If you don't have enough attention span to watch a 13-minute video, then don't concern yourself with something that doesn't concern you. Baarakallaahu feekum.
Truly bankrupt
اتق الله، لاحول ولاقوة الا بالله