"Amber Heard Perpetrated Intimate Partner Violence Towards Johnny Depp" Says Psychologist

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 кві 2022
  • During the cross-examination of Dr. Shannon Curry, a forensic psychologist, she was questioned on whether she believed that Amber Heard perpetrated intimate partner violence (IPV) towards Johnny Depp.
    #JohnnyDepp #AmberHeard #ShannonCurry
    Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on UA-camTV!
    tv.ua-cam.com/users/welcome?...
    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
    OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
    lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
    READ MORE GREAT ARTICLES FROM LAW&CRIME NETWORK HERE:
    lawandcrime.com
    SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF Law&Crime Network UA-cam Channels:
    Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
    Channel B: / @lawandcrimeshorts
    Channel C: / @lawandcrimetrials
    Channel D / @lawandcrimebodycam
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9 тис.

  • @OpenMind3000
    @OpenMind3000 2 роки тому +18371

    Are Ambers lawyers so bad or is it just so impossible to make her look innocent?

    • @elenawilliams32
      @elenawilliams32 2 роки тому +1

      Both. I hope she's paying through the nose for them.

    • @SenatiaA
      @SenatiaA 2 роки тому +939

      I am going with the latter.

    • @teddivampire
      @teddivampire 2 роки тому +1020

      Lol both

    • @devileye90
      @devileye90 2 роки тому +672

      at the lengths amber went to lie & manipulate her way, it isn’t normal. Even a good lawyer is unable to help back up her lies without lying and twisting it further, which could backfire. i’d say it’s the latter. Unless the lawyer can catch up with AH’s narrative and one up her in making her look innocent.

    • @kaiatleo
      @kaiatleo 2 роки тому +79

      DING DING DING

  • @daisyymichelle
    @daisyymichelle 2 роки тому +15419

    Amber’s lawyers are so embarrassing to watch 😂😂😂

    • @aesthetic_armyxo
      @aesthetic_armyxo 2 роки тому +24

      Daisy?! Lmao

    • @sarahkelly3234
      @sarahkelly3234 2 роки тому +79

      🤡🤡Amber's Lawyer

    • @kateshorter1807
      @kateshorter1807 2 роки тому +93

      She has an Elizabeth Warren vibe.

    • @_bhllhb_
      @_bhllhb_ 2 роки тому +103

      yah Amber's lawyers obtained their law degrees with 2 proofs of purchase of cracker jack LMAO

    • @mikeyj.philly
      @mikeyj.philly 2 роки тому +65

      Actually, given how flimsy Heard's case is, there's some all-star representation in this cross-examination.

  • @Harvles93
    @Harvles93 2 роки тому +3766

    The fact the lawyer patronises a PSYCHOLOGIST on not knowing legal terms is beyond hilarious. This is clear evidence of a beaten case, scraping the barrel clutching at straws, I wonder what will come up next.

    • @SGaming-cw7vh
      @SGaming-cw7vh 2 роки тому +43

      It's pretty clear what's happening next: Amber will lose the case. Jail is likely, but she may also end up in inpatient care. Either way, this woman shouldn't be on the streets.

    • @ironik4400
      @ironik4400 2 роки тому +55

      "So you are aware Mr. Depp enjoys pizza, correct? You are aware Mr. Depp eats other foods, correct? Do I know what Arnica cream is? No. Because I call it Amica cream. Im having a stroke your honor." This case from Ambers end is just sad.

    • @crosscategory
      @crosscategory 2 роки тому

      @@SGaming-cw7vh make me wonder if it would have been easier to settle for a lesser amount and say something like “money might do more good if used for psych treatments for Amber” and go for the “have some pity for this clearly somewhat mentally unstable person” route

    • @professor1262
      @professor1262 2 роки тому +19

      This is a civil case, so no jail time. It’s likely he’ll win this case since the burden of proof is beyond a reasonable preponderance (51% likelihood the allegations are true). In criminal court there has to be a 99% chance, he could also win. However, statue of limitation says 6 years, max, for domestic violence cases. So it’d unfortunately be thrown out, and prosecutors wouldn’t pursue.

    • @JuubiNarama
      @JuubiNarama 2 роки тому +8

      @@ironik4400 objection hearsay :D

  • @bedopskepop7936
    @bedopskepop7936 2 роки тому +3474

    I know many people think ambers lawyers are bad because she’s so hard to defend(which is true) but this lawyer is incredibly disrespectful, and bases a case off trying to trick the witness into saying something that supports her case by asking overly long wordy questions that have unnecessary grammar. Overall very unprofessional on the lawyers part and Dr curry was a champion out there

    • @nannazhang1950
      @nannazhang1950 2 роки тому +28

      Fully agree!

    • @tonigomez561
      @tonigomez561 2 роки тому +149

      She was asking questions that she couldn’t even read correctly.

    • @bumgy1686
      @bumgy1686 2 роки тому +73

      lawyers are allowed to play with any witness's feelings, not to a point of genuine disrespect or outright rudeness, but it is a strategy to rile someone up to get them to trip in their words. It seems that is the only strategy her team is attempting. Both attorneys/lawyers come off as semi-hostile to get a reaction.. no one is taking the bait.

    • @johntroze11
      @johntroze11 2 роки тому +13

      thats something even good lawyers do. Kinda like a hail mary

    • @yellowdayz1800
      @yellowdayz1800 2 роки тому +8

      It is possible that Amber demanded this to be done as she was paying..

  • @fernandoemh
    @fernandoemh 2 роки тому +20230

    Dr. Curry did an outstanding job correcting Amber's lawyer in several ocassions, specially when Amber's lawyer was being misleading and asking trick questions. Kudos to her.

    • @keystone.state.railfan3464
      @keystone.state.railfan3464 2 роки тому +54

      YES I AGREE

    • @nelle9118
      @nelle9118 2 роки тому +44

      @@selfesteem3447 Can I call Dibs on JD? 🙃
      I've hallways though he was a great actor but now I just pray for his happiness! Poor guy!

    • @immealldayeveryday9425
      @immealldayeveryday9425 2 роки тому +29

      @@josephhect5339 how are you gonna make a comment like this lord Jesus grab the wheel

    • @lindasanchez5079
      @lindasanchez5079 2 роки тому +93

      Loved it when she told the lawyer if they can just move on from the muffin thing. Like how many times do they have to go through that lol

    • @doriwilson6991
      @doriwilson6991 2 роки тому +182

      Heard's lawyer thought she could intimidate her and boy was she was wrong. I loved that she would tell the lawyer she was wrong or incorrect without batting an eye.

  • @jennachristine8227
    @jennachristine8227 2 роки тому +5617

    "I'm not an attorney, I don't understand necessarily all of these procedures."
    What a classy way of saying "stop wording these in such a way to trick me"

    • @amberlance3221
      @amberlance3221 2 роки тому

      I can't get over the fact she said she wasn't a lawyer, so she wasn't sure. The attorney just proceeds to assume the complexities of psychology.
      (Paraphrasing): "mR. dEpP sAiD bOrDeRliNe AnD yOu SaId TyPe B pErSoNaLiTy"
      Heard does have a type B personality. The evidence shows there is something wrong with her behaviour. Those audio recordings show she is emotional and destructive (classic for a Borderline personality).
      Having a Borderline personality doesn't mean she is a bad person, but without treatment she is a danger to herself and others.

    • @RobotPilots
      @RobotPilots 2 роки тому +2

      @Don't click profile photo ok 👍

    • @emmabunch-benson4795
      @emmabunch-benson4795 2 роки тому +97

      Exactly! I peeped that was exactly what the lawyer was trying to do! Just another manipulation tactic

    • @kintsugi2262
      @kintsugi2262 2 роки тому +1

      time ?

    • @symX
      @symX 2 роки тому

      @@kintsugi2262 3:17

  • @gracegiven3182
    @gracegiven3182 2 роки тому +1953

    I cannot believe that the judge allowed this crazy, convoluted, and non-sensical questioning by that ridiculous lawyer. She is a disgrace. More importantly, Dr. Curry is a shining example of a mental health professional with amazing composure and intelligence.

    • @Brown86Eyes
      @Brown86Eyes 2 роки тому

      Someone needs to take Dr Curry out for drinks. She deserves it!

    • @YamiKisara
      @YamiKisara 2 роки тому +30

      Well, that's probably what she thought afterwards as well, but she has no way of knowing if those questions lead up to something important for this case. At least she shot her down herself once or twice, without any objections proposed. She's probably gonna do it more as the case drags on and she finds they really have nothing but trick questions up their sleeve.

    • @kharizagm
      @kharizagm 2 роки тому +2

      💯‼️

    • @passiveaggressive6175
      @passiveaggressive6175 2 роки тому +5

      I don’t know whether its up to the judge to decide who should be Amber Heard’s counsel. Am I right? Just asking…….

    • @erhaboriE
      @erhaboriE 2 роки тому +12

      That's not up to the judge. This is a legal proceeding, the lawyer is allowed to question the witness.

  • @mistygrixti7378
    @mistygrixti7378 2 роки тому +3554

    This psychologist was literally asked what a 'diagnosis' and a 'personality disorder' is (which in my opinion is common sense), but when asked what these are she answered politely. Meanwhile, when Amber's lawyer is asked about the terminology she uses (that a person who doesn't study law wouldn't know) she almost mocks her for not knowing. Says a lot about her in my opinion.

    • @monkiram
      @monkiram 2 роки тому +277

      Yeah that's the part that made me lose the most respect for her. The rest of it, she was just doing her job trying to portray the psychologist as unreliable. But that part was just rude and bullying. And the psychologist takes it so well and isn't fazed at all.

    • @DeadEndGoose
      @DeadEndGoose 2 роки тому +28

      @@monkiram to be fair she is a forensic psychologist, after all

    • @spiralrose
      @spiralrose 2 роки тому +43

      To be fair, most people seem to be under the impression that personality disorder can be cured. So it would probably be a good thing to explain that it can’t, nor can it be mitigated with medication

    • @spiralrose
      @spiralrose 2 роки тому

      Folks seem to get mental illness and personality disorder confused a lot. I haven’t watched that part of this interrogation or interview or whatever, I am under the impression that mental illness is quite different

    • @katie5998
      @katie5998 2 роки тому +39

      @@spiralrose Actually, the symtoms of borderline can greatly reduce and almost completely become diminished through treatment and age.

  • @dysnomia6413
    @dysnomia6413 2 роки тому +6120

    The number of times this psychologist had to tell the lawyer "that's not correct" is so embarrassing.

    • @ianleonard3264
      @ianleonard3264 2 роки тому +213

      I found it delicious that almost every time she passive aggressively went “is that correct”
      Doc would just look up in the air and go nope

    • @Anonymous13570
      @Anonymous13570 2 роки тому +66

      Exactly this psychologist was amazing 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • @dirkdiggler6962
      @dirkdiggler6962 2 роки тому +56

      @@ianleonard3264 Delicious? Wtf? Out of all the words in the English language to use as an adjective you pick delicious? Really? Well, ill give you props for thinking outside the box 📦👏 lol.

    • @ronkissaa4854
      @ronkissaa4854 2 роки тому +30

      fr, I'm only halfway through the video and she told her "that's not correct" like 10 times.
      or more.
      that lawyer is at the wrong job, being a clown is way better and more fitting for her.

    • @WILDCATZ7777
      @WILDCATZ7777 2 роки тому +5

      This was awsome!!

  • @aangie7881
    @aangie7881 2 роки тому +5370

    The audacity of Amber’s lawyer to say “no” when the psychologist asked if she could explain what something meant 😂 her legal team is so desperate, it’s embarrassing

    • @MrGtagangster
      @MrGtagangster 2 роки тому

      It's actually a shame to all lawyers to have such bafoons working in the field, they try SO SO hard to get this case over to Amber to win. (frankly I'd be surprised if she won). But they have nothing but speculation, hearsay, no real evidence, going AGAINST a professional Psychologist and asking 10.000 of the same questions.
      I really hope the jury can see through all this BS and call JD as the winner.

    • @dataengineer4424
      @dataengineer4424 2 роки тому +15

      Timestamp?

    • @brycet1177
      @brycet1177 2 роки тому +10

      @@dataengineer4424 around 14:35

    • @brycet1177
      @brycet1177 2 роки тому +76

      Whoops sorry, 13:10

    • @aksjhdbaksjhdbNotASpam
      @aksjhdbaksjhdbNotASpam 2 роки тому +15

      @@dataengineer4424 13:18

  • @theunreasonableman8758
    @theunreasonableman8758 2 роки тому +983

    Unbelievable.. Imagine trying to use psychological tricks on an actual psychologist ( a forensic psychologist) .

    • @TheLadyLucas
      @TheLadyLucas 2 роки тому +16

      Lol right!

    • @kharizagm
      @kharizagm 2 роки тому +6

      😂😂😂👌🏽

    • @irvingdelgado1731
      @irvingdelgado1731 2 роки тому +3

      What are the psychological tricks?

    • @Maria-wm1mk
      @Maria-wm1mk 2 роки тому +16

      @@irvingdelgado1731 it's like you're manipulating someone to do something that is in your favour by tricking them using psychology. A common example is reverse psychology.

    • @DrOinkman
      @DrOinkman 2 роки тому +10

      @@irvingdelgado1731 some examples are trick questions (which lawyers like to use) or rephrasing what was said differently to change the statement unnotified.

  • @veganleigh4817
    @veganleigh4817 2 роки тому +671

    I like this witness. She states the facts, clarifies those facts, when necessary, and stands her ground when the lawyer tries to trap her! She's so cool, calm, and collected!

    • @Leonedwards01
      @Leonedwards01 2 роки тому +1

      She is also bad

    • @syel2219
      @syel2219 2 роки тому

      @@Leonedwards01 bad why

    • @Leonedwards01
      @Leonedwards01 2 роки тому +1

      @@syel2219 nvm

    • @owengeo553
      @owengeo553 2 роки тому +9

      @@syel2219 I believe this fine gentleman was referring to her being 'bad' in the sense that she is an attractive woman.

    • @merrittreeves7136
      @merrittreeves7136 2 роки тому +1

      Her demeanor was a complete opposite of the way the other so-called expert for Amber’s side of things acted in her witness testimony

  • @frothycunt
    @frothycunt 2 роки тому +5143

    Literally all this woman did was prove Dr. Curry tells the truth and doesn’t change her answers to fit a narrative.

    • @peterhaas447
      @peterhaas447 2 роки тому +16

      I disagree , I think you’re on the right track she came out better as a witness for the prosecutor But the defense did manage to punch a little hole in her credibility and that’s the interesting thing about these trials in my opinion.
      So many angles.

    • @yakuzzi35
      @yakuzzi35 2 роки тому +14

      @@peterhaas447 What would you say the hole in her credibility is? I've been struggling to follow this exactly and haven't been paying attention to the dates lol

    • @sarahs3305
      @sarahs3305 2 роки тому

      @@peterhaas447 I don't see any holes in her credibility. I see a witness who is firm in her experiences before and during this trial, and a professional who is not swayed by leading and confusing trick questions. Honestly, the defense has only made herself look like an incompetent and scummy attorney by deliberately undermining expert findings, using trick questions to confuse witnesses in the hopes they stumble and say something they don't actually mean, and by denying an expert the ability to explain what something means. That only shows this defense team does not care about truth or fact, just winning by all means necessary.

    • @kobakobakoba
      @kobakobakoba 2 роки тому +70

      @@yakuzzi35 so far all the lawyer did was state the fact that this dr has never been in court. So idk where her credibility fell. But to me her work as a doctor didnt lose any credibility, but her experience in court has no credibility. But then again. Id hope many psychologist would not have that court experience. Because thatd be sad.

    • @WVRLORD
      @WVRLORD 2 роки тому +119

      @@kobakobakoba Just because she has little to no court experience doesn’t mean she’s not an expert in her field, which is the most important factor to the case

  • @marie8517
    @marie8517 2 роки тому +11071

    I have secondhand embarrassment for this lawyer, she is so disrespectful. This Dr is just incredible, what a class act!

    • @beanseason6515
      @beanseason6515 2 роки тому +280

      The cringe is almost painful

    • @elliebellie7816
      @elliebellie7816 2 роки тому +213

      Yes, I'd definitely want this Dr. testifying on my behalf if I ever needed her in court.

    • @Jumpman90
      @Jumpman90 2 роки тому

      Yes, and she’s sexy too

    • @thesingerintheshower
      @thesingerintheshower 2 роки тому +8

      😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

    • @jannyx6363
      @jannyx6363 2 роки тому +228

      Its a lawyer its her job. She was just trying to make the doctor very uncomfortable on purpose with her aggressive attitude and difficult questions, hoping that she would break, and trying to make people question her credibility and professionality. Its not pleasant for the doctor but she is a threat for ambers defence so they did everything they could to discredit her. Its nothing personal.

  • @sin3358
    @sin3358 2 роки тому +501

    This is so tiring, all of it. I can't imagine what it's like to be questioned like that for such long periods of time and having to keep a sharp, logical mind at all times. Mad respect to Mrs. Curry. She's easily becoming one of the people I admire

    • @laurencohen5441
      @laurencohen5441 2 роки тому +10

      Dr. Curry

    • @penny4371
      @penny4371 2 роки тому +3

      You meant to say Dr. Curry?

    • @TimboTbagz
      @TimboTbagz 2 роки тому +1

      @@Arwyn76 Have you ever read your own comments? Please take a break from the internet!

    • @Narqez22
      @Narqez22 Рік тому

      @@Arwyn76 jeez what a snowflake. you definitely have a personality disorder haha

  • @arizonarangershat3831
    @arizonarangershat3831 2 роки тому +282

    The psychologist Dr. Curry would be a comfort to have on your side. She’s absolutely phenomenal. She’s assertive, and stays firm. She is clearly very smart and great at her job.

  • @darianromero3532
    @darianromero3532 2 роки тому +2698

    "Can I explain what I mean?"
    "No"
    This is a bad lawyer. She knows if the psychologist were to explain what she meant it would have undercut whatever attack she was planning.

    • @bakaichigo
      @bakaichigo 2 роки тому +26

      yeeeeeeeeeeep

    • @w0jda195
      @w0jda195 2 роки тому +96

      i don't think she's a bad lawyer. She knows what she's doing. This amount of manipulation wouldn't be possible for less knowledgeable person.

    • @kellbell2114
      @kellbell2114 2 роки тому +107

      @@w0jda195 She's grasping for for anything, to try and defend her guilty client.

    • @faminaexmachina
      @faminaexmachina 2 роки тому

      Thank you! That was so funny. What a scum bag that lawyer is.

    • @darianromero3532
      @darianromero3532 2 роки тому +44

      @@w0jda195 I guess I should have been a lot more clear. She's a bad person is what I mean. As far as being a lawyer she's actually not that great of a lawyer. At least compared to Depp's team.

  • @angrysadmillennial
    @angrysadmillennial 2 роки тому +4481

    this psychologist is the shining example of what kind of role models this world needs

    • @marcsman07
      @marcsman07 2 роки тому +128

      She's classy af.

    • @hannahhartley9443
      @hannahhartley9443 2 роки тому +27

      Agree 100%

    • @cristianacriss7082
      @cristianacriss7082 2 роки тому +76

      @@marcsman07 classy, smart and extremely well prepared in her field

    • @elizabethg2062
      @elizabethg2062 2 роки тому +19

      She's a better role model than Amber Heard

    • @angrysadmillennial
      @angrysadmillennial 2 роки тому +14

      light years better... I actually doubt AH can serve as a positive role model at all🤷

  • @Mulatika_
    @Mulatika_ 2 роки тому +217

    This psychologist will get even more fame , after this trial . She’s amazing we’ll spoken very calm and makes sure she breaks down everything I love her .

  • @skyefrost7040
    @skyefrost7040 2 роки тому +158

    “Did I read that correctly?”
    “Uh, it says ‘perpetrated’, but otherwise yes”
    This is both embarrassing and extremely entertaining to watch, Dr Curry has a solid handle on this

  • @castrolauraand5588
    @castrolauraand5588 2 роки тому +1665

    That lawyer trying to turn a clinical diagnosis into an "opinion" is a huge display of ignorance

    • @noahgm9629
      @noahgm9629 2 роки тому +172

      @@thinkingallowed7042 they CAN diagnose they cannot prescribe

    • @insomniacraccoon
      @insomniacraccoon 2 роки тому +93

      @@noahgm9629 ive been in therapy for over 10 years. this is absolutely correct. my psychologist can and has given me diagnoses. she cannot prescribe me medication. my psychiatrist can and has given me diagnoses AND can and has prescribed me medicaton.

    • @trillbrown3686
      @trillbrown3686 2 роки тому +17

      @@thinkingallowed7042 not true.

    • @thinkingallowed7042
      @thinkingallowed7042 2 роки тому +1

      @@insomniacraccoon But that doesn't mean your psychologist's opinions would be approved as a diagnosis by a medical practitioner independent of the psychiatrist's diagnosis. Any documents provided to you by a psychologist should not contain the words diagnosis prior to a diagnosis by a psychiatrist. From what you wrote about being diagnosed by a psychiatrist, it would seem your psychologist is able to refer to a diagnosis because you have been diagnosed, by a psychiatrist.

    • @thinkingallowed7042
      @thinkingallowed7042 2 роки тому

      @@trillbrown3686 Yes, it is.

  • @50k_Challenge_with_0video
    @50k_Challenge_with_0video 2 роки тому +1926

    Amber Heard’s attorney is mixing up “Borderline Personality Disorder” and “Bipolar Disorder”. They’re not the same thing!

    • @ColdSold1eR
      @ColdSold1eR 2 роки тому +160

      I picked up on that, strange that the psychiatrist didn't call her out on it though

    • @emmabunch-benson4795
      @emmabunch-benson4795 2 роки тому +4

      Literally

    • @emmabunch-benson4795
      @emmabunch-benson4795 2 роки тому

      @@ColdSold1eR probably figured lawyer would continue to dig her own grave & that her, the judge, & everyone else would know better as that just basic knowledge most people have when it comes to mental illness & being able to differentiate between them

    • @ColdSold1eR
      @ColdSold1eR 2 роки тому +2

      @@emmabunch-benson4795 Very true

    • @ColdSold1eR
      @ColdSold1eR 2 роки тому +33

      @@poot7743 You may have a point, but if that's the case, it didn't work lol

  • @lanakorvin2445
    @lanakorvin2445 2 роки тому +136

    The irony is she recorded all this to make him look bad but she's just proving his innocence
    The psychologist was so right about her language and the way she talks: she speaks in circles without really saying anything at all.
    she is forcing him to love her, she doesn't want to be rejected, she stalked him even after initiating the restraint order, this is also a serious breach, she should go to prison for what she has done to that poor man, she drove him to the end of his tether

    • @criztu
      @criztu 2 роки тому +4

      as an ancient Chinese saying goes: don't put schlong in crazy

  • @martinamcwilliams3324
    @martinamcwilliams3324 2 роки тому +92

    "That's not quite right."
    I learned a judious way to handle a situation when a person tries to unfairly paint me into a corner with inaccurate info or in a misleading manner.

    • @Anwelei
      @Anwelei 2 роки тому +2

      i've learned the same thing. Very helpful.

    • @riyapundir6306
      @riyapundir6306 2 роки тому +3

      I have learned so much from this video than I ever could so far. Kudos to Dr. curry

  • @zameel23
    @zameel23 2 роки тому +2331

    A lawyer playing mind tricks on a professional psychologist is hilarious to watch😂 it's like watching someone arguing subjective scientific hypothesis with an astrophysicist who literally wrote the objective truth 🤣

    • @elaineelaine6418
      @elaineelaine6418 2 роки тому +54

      No, science, especially physics, can never be "the truth". We can create models that will approach what we observe as close as possible, but we'll never know if it's the truth. There isn't some grander being that will one day tell us "yes, that's it, you found the real theory of gravitation." That's why they're called theories.
      That said, I liked your comment and I got the idea :3

    • @katerinapatiniotis5598
      @katerinapatiniotis5598 2 роки тому +46

      It's like a coach trying to teach Messi how to play soccer.

    • @rkymtnchi503
      @rkymtnchi503 2 роки тому +8

      @@katerinapatiniotis5598 and a hockey coach at that

    • @caeliamoonshadow
      @caeliamoonshadow 2 роки тому +11

      Man she's trying so hard 🤣

    • @PunkMartyr
      @PunkMartyr 2 роки тому

      @@elaineelaine6418 lol nothing you said is correct and it’s sad 9 lost souls upvoted it. There have literally been thousands of instances where scientists were able to prove their theories as true. That said I am being a little bit assinine as you’re specifically honing in on physics. Of all the scientific fields physics probably contains the most theories that will never be 100% proven to be truth for various reasons that can be summed up as it’s not realistically feasible.

  • @KaiserBruh
    @KaiserBruh 2 роки тому +4055

    I am literally star struck by this Psychologist. She is just so well spoken and articulate and elocuent. Everything she says makes sense to me. The way she stands her ground and doesn't cower to the vain hostility from the disrespectful lawyer. She stands firm because she knows she can rely on her own research, experience, and knowledge to know better than to play into the karens mental games (she's a psychologist, duh).

    • @Voicesinme
      @Voicesinme 2 роки тому +39

      Yes, some faith in humanity restoring brain functions going on in her head

    • @ninehornedelk
      @ninehornedelk 2 роки тому +14

      Totally agree! Amazing woman!

    • @goodlookinouthomie1757
      @goodlookinouthomie1757 2 роки тому +34

      Most impressive us she doesn't fall into any of the traps laid for her.

    • @scalyvisitor418
      @scalyvisitor418 2 роки тому +9

      Speaking of well-spoken, it's "eloquent," unless you're speaking Spanish lol. No shade, this comment was written well otherwise

    • @Balteus_420
      @Balteus_420 2 роки тому +35

      You can’t really play mind games with an expert on the mind

  • @perniciousreaper4393
    @perniciousreaper4393 2 роки тому +333

    This attorney's decision to treat an expert witness in such a grating and condescending manner is either ineptitude or a strategy borne of desperation. One of the quickest ways to lose a jury is to be rude or condescending to expert witnesses. The only exception is when you know without a shred of doubt that you can discredit them and you're building up to it. Otherwise, it usually backfires tremendously.

    • @sin3358
      @sin3358 2 роки тому +3

      That made me think if it's possible for jury's to have biased cases. If I was the jury, I absolutely would have not bothered to listen to AH's side and just ended it with making johnny innocent and amber the perpetrator

    • @csloane4129
      @csloane4129 2 роки тому +3

      it is not uncommon for insecure, older women to treat younger, "pretty" females this way. With hostile condescension. No matter how intelligent or accomplished the younger woman may be, the insecure older woman will try desperately to undermine and discredit her.

  • @modmutha8608
    @modmutha8608 2 роки тому +75

    What is this lawyer trying to get at exactly? She’s going around in circles. She is trying to bamboozle and confuse the witness. Who could keep up with this woman’s questioning??

    • @dbliss741
      @dbliss741 2 роки тому +3

      Yeah it’s a little confusing, I think maybe she’s trying to say that she’s disqualified for this case because
      A) she has never testified within a similar case
      B) she met with the legal team before and would’ve had to make them believe she would give the diagnosis they wanted to hear despite not making an expert opinion yet. Idk though court is confusing

    • @LazyKingAus
      @LazyKingAus 2 роки тому +4

      It's to discredit the witness so her testimonials hold less weight

  • @GhostOfSparta305
    @GhostOfSparta305 2 роки тому +2727

    Dr. Curry has the patience of a saint here. Being a psychologist must make it so easy to see through Amber's lawyer's manipulative BS.

    • @katerinapatiniotis5598
      @katerinapatiniotis5598 2 роки тому +132

      big time. She reads them all like a book.

    • @jannyx6363
      @jannyx6363 2 роки тому +81

      Its nothing personal its just their job. The doctor is smart enought to know that.

    • @michellem9275
      @michellem9275 2 роки тому

      If Mrs.Curry wasn't married..Johnny would sweep her off her feet...she was epic!👍

    • @julietteoscaralphanovember2223
      @julietteoscaralphanovember2223 2 роки тому +53

      She's a paid expert and I'm sure she was chosen because of her knowledge and her calm demeanor.

    • @jimcapunong
      @jimcapunong 2 роки тому +41

      @@julietteoscaralphanovember2223 and the lawyer was supposed to be a paid expert too :)

  • @RobVespa
    @RobVespa 2 роки тому +5350

    It would be challenging to overstate how impressive Dr. Curry's testimony is. She exhibited the epitome of professionalism, class, composure, and confidence.

    • @sounique505
      @sounique505 2 роки тому +29

      Perfect example of what's done in the dark always comes to light.

    • @handlemeifyoucan144
      @handlemeifyoucan144 2 роки тому +52

      Women we need in the legal system 🔥

    • @The-Athenian
      @The-Athenian 2 роки тому +2

      I was just thinking that.

    • @schwarz8614
      @schwarz8614 2 роки тому +5

      Just how most psychologists are tbh

    • @RobVespa
      @RobVespa 2 роки тому +12

      @@schwarz8614 - Sadly, this isn't accurate. Far far far from it. I wish it weren't so.

  • @thecharlotteansell
    @thecharlotteansell 2 роки тому +465

    Ambers counsel is clearly as rude and insufferable as she is. This poor woman having to take these questions it was painful to watch, she was just trying to throw her off and get her to say something harmful. I don’t know how she did it without eye rolling because I certainly would have😅

    • @sakaiahreign3365
      @sakaiahreign3365 2 роки тому +1

      That’s why she hired them 🤣

    • @criztu
      @criztu 2 роки тому +1

      Johnny fell in love with her, she's wonderful.

    • @shawneharmer
      @shawneharmer 2 роки тому

      You can roll your eyes?!?!
      Don’t they get dusty, dirty or damaged if you do that? How do you reattach them?
      This is fascinating.

  • @leccy9901
    @leccy9901 2 роки тому +108

    One of the most basic things you learn as a lawyer is never ask a question you do not know the answer to. I've been a lawyer for 5 years and would run rings around Amber's legal team, they are terrible. Probably costing far more than they should. Johnny is very far ahead in this case so far.

    • @DrOinkman
      @DrOinkman 2 роки тому +1

      well, they are also poorly informed thanks to their client lying 24/7. i assume they THINK they know at least most answers and end up suprised to find out their client is talking bs 24/7. how would you handle such a situation?

    • @leccy9901
      @leccy9901 2 роки тому +3

      @@DrOinkman it's a hard one to be honest. You have to defend your client no matter if you think they are correct or not. They know what she is, they know the story is all over the place. Without seeing all the evidence I could not tell you a plan, but some of the questions they got wrong where factual statements by psychologists, incorrect accounts from key witnesses they had interviewed, medical reports the list goes on. Not to mention objecting there own questions. They are ridiculous. Never be the aggressive lawyer with near rude questions and language when defending the aggressor. They should be trying to make there team, and amber seem calm and professional, the nice guys in the room. Make the jury side with you. They are doing anything but that.

    • @ragtop_annie
      @ragtop_annie Рік тому

      @@leccy9901 Very interesting insights on this trial from a legal professional. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

  • @jenica1388
    @jenica1388 2 роки тому +4067

    It’s interesting that her attorneys are resorting to tricks of wording and bullying when they claim to have such a strong case

    • @Ilovegrunge123
      @Ilovegrunge123 2 роки тому +27

      The worst part of all this is they have a strong favor to win and they are still trying to pull all these tricks.

    • @markrivera3705
      @markrivera3705 2 роки тому +15

      A strong case is just another way to take Amber's money.

    • @adolfocoy7516
      @adolfocoy7516 2 роки тому +122

      @@Ilovegrunge123 what case are yoy watching. Depp is obviously in the right

    • @plantsbyhailey8326
      @plantsbyhailey8326 2 роки тому +1

      i love it

    • @moysauce788
      @moysauce788 2 роки тому +52

      @@Ilovegrunge123 Where is the favor? Let alone "strong"....hello?

  • @arreza3080
    @arreza3080 2 роки тому +2103

    It's hilarious how this lawyer keeps pretending like she's caught the therapist in a lie but she keeps referring to pages that just confirm the consistency of her answer.

    • @aguythatsrandom
      @aguythatsrandom 2 роки тому +175

      Yeah that literally made no sense. 'You said you did this' 'No' 'Let's turn to this pointless page' 'Ok' 'Can you read what you said' 'It says 'no'' LMFAO

    • @JaimeRodriguez-wf1vr
      @JaimeRodriguez-wf1vr 2 роки тому

      This lawyer sucks it

    • @juliewebb6234
      @juliewebb6234 2 роки тому +24

      She asked the same questions over and over like the Dr would answer differently the next time she asked.

    • @Strange9952
      @Strange9952 2 роки тому +1

      That's the whole point, to provide your client with the best defense possible. Ultimately the jury will decide.

  • @dazaiedd
    @dazaiedd 2 роки тому +17

    The lawyer trying to play psychological games with THE psychologist.. THE AUDACITY

  • @ashleighszarka-rempel6264
    @ashleighszarka-rempel6264 2 роки тому +90

    The psychologist did a stunningly professional job. In contrast, it seems incredibly odd that such a high-profile case would hire such a horribly bad lawyer..

  • @minervasjourney
    @minervasjourney 2 роки тому +2461

    This lawyer tries to talk to a professional adult like she's reprimanding a child! She's ridiculous! Dr. Curry is definitely a prepared professional

    • @ElleW18
      @ElleW18 2 роки тому +79

      it's the stereotypical arrogant condescension of a lawyer who actually in fact does not know anything

    • @npkrn6764
      @npkrn6764 2 роки тому +5

      A prepared professional maybe, but a manipulator of the facts! One of the few careers where manipulative ways are applauded and even beneficial - being a lawyer. 😂🤣

    • @Kanjoo.
      @Kanjoo. 2 роки тому +2

      yeah, the entire time im like can she stop fcking trying to make her seem like an invalid witness?
      like if u want to see whether or not she testified about smth dont worry we'll send u her resume, CAN U STOP ASKING IF SHE TESTIFIED about stuff so freaking specific?!

    • @northerngirl1637
      @northerngirl1637 2 роки тому +6

      She's not easily rattled.👍

    • @Maggs-2248
      @Maggs-2248 2 роки тому +4

      Condescending and rude! It would prejudice me against Amber.

  • @bobbyybouchee
    @bobbyybouchee 2 роки тому +1893

    You can‘t outsmart a smart person by pretending to be smart yourself. Dr. Curry did an outstanding job.

    • @tonia4934
      @tonia4934 2 роки тому +8

      She’s great and unflappable

    • @user-rv4wn5qk7q
      @user-rv4wn5qk7q 2 роки тому +9

      @Don't click profile photo I won't

    • @UberAlphaSirus
      @UberAlphaSirus 2 роки тому

      You really don't have to be smart.

    • @nurseaylla
      @nurseaylla 2 роки тому +14

      Trying to outsmart a professional that deals with people’s mind problems 😌 that lawyer was set up to be schooled by Dr. Curry

    • @Knighty-hr2dw
      @Knighty-hr2dw 2 роки тому +1

      “Fake it till you make it”

  • @WKADESIGNS
    @WKADESIGNS 2 роки тому +24

    Seeing Dr. Curry stand firmly against Amber's Karen Lawyer is actually really inspiring.

  • @iblakis
    @iblakis 2 роки тому +98

    The lawyers know they’re losing. They win by asking and baiting with trick questions to “sway” the jury. But even the jury is confused when the lawyers can’t even pronounce a word and jumble these questions.

  • @Lehmann108
    @Lehmann108 2 роки тому +4025

    She is excellent on the stand. She's never defensive, calmly stating facts. Reframing the implications of the attorney.

    • @Knighty-hr2dw
      @Knighty-hr2dw 2 роки тому +5

      @Don't click profile photo Commence eye roll

    • @Plumbb
      @Plumbb 2 роки тому

      Frrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

    • @stevewarwick2103
      @stevewarwick2103 2 роки тому +37

      I've become a fan tbh. She's a pro and didn't take the smear merchant's BS easily.

    • @paulatodd9589
      @paulatodd9589 2 роки тому

      ?? Actually, she is making it clear she is not a neutral as suggested. She is the victim of fraud and defamation by the people who are paying her (Depp & Co.), and she is covering up the magnitude of their wrongdoing with her failure to flag their alleged crimes.

    • @zacharyspurlin957
      @zacharyspurlin957 2 роки тому +1

      She couldn’t even understand the simple questions….

  • @austinlambdin
    @austinlambdin 2 роки тому +1468

    Attorney: “You’re tired of getting cross examined by me, correct?”
    Psychiatrist: “that’s correct”

    • @aaahtex902
      @aaahtex902 2 роки тому +11

      **LOVE THE REPLY!!!**

    • @patricknelson
      @patricknelson 2 роки тому +99

      Objection, your honor. Hearsay.

    • @maryannewright5013
      @maryannewright5013 2 роки тому +3

      @@patricknelson 🤣🤣🤣

    • @martinstubbs7974
      @martinstubbs7974 2 роки тому +7

      That is absolutely brilliant 🤣🤣

    • @april-tui3524
      @april-tui3524 2 роки тому

      Bredehoft brought up court documents from February 2021 from Depp's attorney filed in February 2021, stating Curry would testify to Heard having borderline personality disorder, making false allegations and being a perpetrator of intimate partner violence. However, she did not meet with Amber until December 2021.
      The ‘psychiatrist’ is a fraud.

  • @cotysedlock856
    @cotysedlock856 2 роки тому +74

    Well, the attorney needs to learn the difference between bi-polar disorder and borderline personality disorder because she asked 2 different questions and expected her to answer the same for both. If she was trying to discredit her on double speaking, she failed miserably.

  • @persistenthustle
    @persistenthustle 2 роки тому +3266

    interrogating a forensic psychologist must be the toughest job for any lawyer - she knows how to control her emotions, she knows all your tricks with emotion, and she is familiar with the court processes.

    • @davetrotter6735
      @davetrotter6735 2 роки тому +370

      For this lawyer, its hard enough to pronounce words correctly 🤣🤣🤣

    • @mani2faded
      @mani2faded 2 роки тому +19

      @@davetrotter6735 LMAO

    • @bow_wow_wow
      @bow_wow_wow 2 роки тому +141

      I mean, one of Amber's lawyers accidentally objected to his own question, so... 😂

    • @savagegeralt9830
      @savagegeralt9830 2 роки тому +1

      @@davetrotter6735 LMAO

    • @beanseason6515
      @beanseason6515 2 роки тому +38

      @20-20 Hindsight it's more that her expertise in how the mind and emotions work, as well as her daily experience weaving through these complex labyrinths in patients and cases makes her impervious to their tricks and tactics to manipulate her and control jury perception

  • @lipstickjelly6831
    @lipstickjelly6831 2 роки тому +1792

    The fact that regular non-lawyer people can see how incompetent amber’s legal counsel is, is giving me lifeeeee lol

    • @TheNielsenicole
      @TheNielsenicole 2 роки тому +2

      🤣🤣

    • @DakonBlackblade2
      @DakonBlackblade2 2 роки тому +131

      The problem is that they are grasping at straws, they have no case and are trying desperately to find something to save their case, they are likely great lawyers but they've been dealt the shittiest of hands.

    • @aie_aie_
      @aie_aie_ 2 роки тому +19

      I think they know very well who their client is and are playing the "bad guy" to please her (and get paid).
      Be aware that profiles like AH usually take pleasure in not paying people, or paying very late, or suing their own lawyers... so her lawyers are in a complex situation.

    • @lipstickjelly6831
      @lipstickjelly6831 2 роки тому +7

      @@DakonBlackblade2 they’ve also been caught lying to the court, and being shady

    • @jannyx6363
      @jannyx6363 2 роки тому +14

      Theyare not incompetent. What else can they do.

  • @glittery8862
    @glittery8862 2 роки тому +101

    Personality disorders require the pattern of behavior to be present by age 18. You CANNOT and I repeat CAN NOT develop a personality disorder in response to trauma at 35 years old. It is not possible. This lawyer should be rightfully embarrassed for her line of questioning.

    • @Vetrarland
      @Vetrarland 2 роки тому +1

      This already made no sense before
      After reading your comment and the way you worded it, makes the idea that you can develop a personality disorder this late in life in response to trauma 1000x times more idiotic.

    • @tffvn4492
      @tffvn4492 Рік тому

      What are you talking about? The idea that it is literally impossible to develop a personality disorder (there's no such clear definition just fyi) after the age of 18 (just couldn't be 22) is not a thing.

    • @glittery8862
      @glittery8862 Рік тому +2

      @@tffvn4492 It is a thing. The behavior pattern that constitutes the personality disorder needs to be present before or at onset of adulthood. Quoted from the DSM5:
      "The pattern is stable and of long duration, and its onset can be traced back at least to adolescence or early adulthood."
      During my clinical psychology degree, practitioners giving lectures on personality disorders generally told us that the behavior being present by the time one enters adulthood (age 18 in my part of the world) will make up 99% of all PD cases.
      If you have a proper understanding of personality disorders and the intense dysfunction they bring, you will understand why it is so unlikely that such a large qualitative difference (going from no to a PD) would occur in middle adulthood. Being diagnosed later in life happens frequently, newly developing one is practically impossible.

    • @tffvn4492
      @tffvn4492 Рік тому

      @@glittery8862 Again, no it is not impossible.

    • @glittery8862
      @glittery8862 Рік тому

      @@tffvn4492 Then how would it be possible, if I may ask?

  • @cheechee6473
    @cheechee6473 2 роки тому +34

    Holy crap she answered these questions so smoothly if that was me I’d be stuttering due to anxiety and possibly crying within three minutes 😭😭

  • @inkera2036
    @inkera2036 2 роки тому +4095

    This psychologist is officially my role model and hero. So even-toned and steady, not being turned around, to the facts. Awesome job lady!

    • @ericurbano9916
      @ericurbano9916 2 роки тому +11

      I agree with you

    • @MM-wv7ys
      @MM-wv7ys 2 роки тому +7

      totally opposite vibe for me ...narc vibess

    • @ahmadfarizbinmokhtar7106
      @ahmadfarizbinmokhtar7106 2 роки тому +48

      She could be a role model, and also simply a model.

    • @augustoalvarez6766
      @augustoalvarez6766 2 роки тому +32

      @@MM-wv7ys you got that from the video???? Maybe the narc is another...

    • @MM-wv7ys
      @MM-wv7ys 2 роки тому +1

      @@augustoalvarez6766 notjust from this video but because of her presentation..

  • @thegingerpowerranger
    @thegingerpowerranger 2 роки тому +2474

    Why is 15 years of psychology experience considered to be worthless because she hasn't been asked to testify on it in a court make her opinion worth any less? This is a very weak attempt to discredit this witness.

    • @khalilrahme5227
      @khalilrahme5227 2 роки тому +128

      Worst part is, she responded that she has testified before. That lawyer is asking questions she doesn't know the answers to

    • @thegingerpowerranger
      @thegingerpowerranger 2 роки тому +99

      And despite saying it was an interview and not dinner 8-9 times the lawyer continued to call it dinner and drinks. Specifically looking to discredit the witness versus trying to understand their testimony and pulling it apart.

    • @alanrush1381
      @alanrush1381 2 роки тому +9

      Because she obviously shows a bias towards Johnny who wined and dined her for an 'interview' at his place.

    • @BlackStar-hy1iy
      @BlackStar-hy1iy 2 роки тому +51

      @@alanrush1381
      Trained to be unbiased, try again.

    • @Punisher18th
      @Punisher18th 2 роки тому +54

      @@alanrush1381 What bias? She got interviewed by the legal team of Johnny Depp at his place and then they offered dinner to thank her for her time.

  • @IcarusII3
    @IcarusII3 2 роки тому +49

    Watching a psychologist recognize and maneuver around the manipulation of these attorneys is very entertaining...

  • @ashbash635
    @ashbash635 2 роки тому +37

    How does a drink being served with dinner at a 4 hour interview where they are all grown ups speaking to each other show bias? This doctor can’t have a drink with the meal whilst being interviewed? What a joke. Depp called her borderline personality disorder and this doctor after an extensive evaluation decided to use that because he said that? I mean is that what’s she’s getting at? The tests the doctor administered are what picked out the bpd she didn’t just pick it out of thin air. The whole muffin thing was embarrassing.

  • @JenMaglalang090209
    @JenMaglalang090209 2 роки тому +2490

    I love Dr. Curry. She did not let that lawyer boss her around, showing how professional and intelligent she is. An amazingly smart woman!

    • @denchiC
      @denchiC 2 роки тому +15

      I was just thinking the same. This psychologist is very impressive.

    • @Michael020
      @Michael020 2 роки тому +1

      To be fair....she was just telling the truth...you cant trick a truth teller; and why would the doctor get stressed over heards lawyers?....she's not Depp or heard,she's just giving the evidence as she saw it
      She's not emotionally involved....dealing with mentally ill patients every day is a lot harder than dealing with heards lawyer

    • @BlowinFree
      @BlowinFree 2 роки тому +4

      @@denchiC doctor 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @DrSleep-ep6cw
      @DrSleep-ep6cw 2 роки тому +21

      I like Dr. Curry, she's better looking than Amber and cool as a cucumber.

    • @caramelpepsi2582
      @caramelpepsi2582 2 роки тому +17

      you can tell she's used to listening to and responding to bats**t questions.

  • @PoeCompany
    @PoeCompany 2 роки тому +3437

    Dr. Shannon Curry is a staple example of class, respect, and humility

    • @thuanchau1985
      @thuanchau1985 2 роки тому +48

      also intelligent

    • @ericohm9474
      @ericohm9474 2 роки тому +81

      @@thuanchau1985 also HAWT

    • @faintsherin4468
      @faintsherin4468 2 роки тому

      @@ericohm9474
      also MILF GOODNESS!

    • @bobabooey289
      @bobabooey289 2 роки тому +1

      @ginger tostada. 🤣😂😂😂You’re SO wrong. She’s just a paid shill for jonny who was so starstruck she stared at Johnny the whole time on the stand. Pathetic

    • @socalrhod
      @socalrhod 2 роки тому +13

      ... and simply GORRRGEOUS❤

  • @h.newton8982
    @h.newton8982 2 роки тому +41

    She keeps getting her to read previous statements as if what she reads will be conflicting her current answer....yet she is just proving just how consistent all her answers are.
    This is fabulous for Johnny 🧡👍

  • @SolLunaTV
    @SolLunaTV 2 роки тому +56

    This lawyer exasperates me. I'm here sitting down thinking like What's the point of all these questions? She's literally asking the questions that were already asked all over again. If she thinks she will trick a PSYCHOLOGIST of all people with mind games she's a clown!

    • @cheniseflowers8143
      @cheniseflowers8143 2 роки тому +2

      the lawyer is out of her league with this trial ENTIRELY

  • @TheRipeTomatoFarms
    @TheRipeTomatoFarms 2 роки тому +4790

    If Heard is still taking "notes", she should write down that THIS is how an intelligent, normal person acts and speaks. Dr Curry is 🔥🔥🔥

    • @marimar8175
      @marimar8175 2 роки тому +2

      🤣

    • @victoriaphantom13
      @victoriaphantom13 2 роки тому +58

      Yes because she's been continuously taking notes and trying look a certain way every trail I've watched. Kinda makes me cringe.

    • @kimfox8622
      @kimfox8622 2 роки тому +14

      @@victoriaphantom13 I know eight. A different personality each day.

    • @johnkyl123
      @johnkyl123 2 роки тому

      10/10 would approach her and perform the mating dance hoping she’s impressed.

    • @Imaginexall
      @Imaginexall 2 роки тому +21

      It's really hard to succeed in acting like Dr. Curry when you're constantly lying x) Her classy/smart attitude comes from straight up facts and truth, something AH lacks cruelly x)

  • @Marcothy_
    @Marcothy_ 2 роки тому +706

    I lost brain cells when the lawyer asked Dr. Curry if she’s ever worked with someone with a personality disorder. She’s a clinical Psychologist…

    • @ArsenicApplejuice
      @ArsenicApplejuice 2 роки тому +2

      Presumably she’s a forensic psychologist

    • @mylesdlm
      @mylesdlm 2 роки тому +4

      @@ArsenicApplejuice objection. Hearsay.

    • @moodlesracing4244
      @moodlesracing4244 2 роки тому +4

      I’ll sustain it

    • @Marcothy_
      @Marcothy_ 2 роки тому

      @@ArsenicApplejuice I could’ve sworn she said clinical but either way you’re still qualified to evaluate and diagnose patients

  • @mattrandazzo132
    @mattrandazzo132 2 роки тому +27

    The psychologist is extremely precise in correcting the record, and the lawyer seems to repeatedly and purposefully get things wrong for optics. Seems like a trick to me

  • @Libbathegreat
    @Libbathegreat 2 роки тому +35

    I'm sorry that Dr. Curry had to put up with this, but I'm heartened by this attorney's clownishly hostile performance because that tells me they're losing this case and they know it :)
    Bonus golden moment @ 20:46-22:22 Lawyer makes insinuation; Depp's team object that it calls for the witness to speculate; judge sustains; lawyer _snaps at judge_ "that's not speculation!"; judge sustains; lawyer woolgathers for several seconds; lawyer adjusts her tone "it goes to bias your honor"; judge sustains again. WOW. She managed to alienate the judge and make herself look like a fool at the same time. I'd almost think she was on Depp's payroll.

  • @91wheelz
    @91wheelz 2 роки тому +421

    "Can I say what that means?"
    "No"
    This trial has become one of the best comedies that Johnny has ever starred in!

    • @timaa.4379
      @timaa.4379 2 роки тому +1

      And the entire court room’s surprised faces were literally all of us. Very clear example of how Heard’s lawyers are trying to manipulate the narrative.

    • @luke8801
      @luke8801 2 роки тому +21

      Love how Dr Curry, the crowd, Johnny, everyone laughed at that. That lawyer is a joke.

    • @tedmosby3942
      @tedmosby3942 2 роки тому

      can I get a time stamp?

    • @sneharubhiniks5045
      @sneharubhiniks5045 2 роки тому +1

      @@tedmosby3942 13:18

    • @tedmosby3942
      @tedmosby3942 2 роки тому +2

      @@sneharubhiniks5045 thank you mate

  • @Infinitykk
    @Infinitykk 2 роки тому +2010

    13:38: “I’ll read it for you if you’re having difficulties” This lawyer annoyed me the entire time with the disrespect and belittling, but goodness this part just made my blood boil. You can even see Johnny Depp and his lawyer laugh from the ridiculousness. Imagine failing so bad at your job that you need to belittle the other person you’re questioning.

    • @seen-ly3fe
      @seen-ly3fe 2 роки тому +174

      She is basically a karen who became an actual lawyer.

    • @stewartmcminn7773
      @stewartmcminn7773 2 роки тому +54

      Difficulties,? She's stumbling and reading the wrong words. Lol
      What a fail

    • @christinegibson1187
      @christinegibson1187 2 роки тому +24

      Ugh yes this lawyer is so irritating!! She is driving me nuts! Curry on the other hand is handling her in such a respectful, dignified and intelligent manner 🙌🏼

    • @beane6426
      @beane6426 2 роки тому +9

      It’s her job dude. Zealous representation of the client. It’s how our legal system works.

    • @JoeB0604
      @JoeB0604 2 роки тому

      attorneys do that when they're not getting the answers they want. they resort to grandstanding and attempted intimidation. it's almost as if Depp's counsel knew Heard's attorney was going to give themselves the rope to hang themselves with

  • @ryanandrous765
    @ryanandrous765 2 роки тому +48

    That lawyer is relentless. Totally trying to twist things around and trying to make things look like they really aren't. Dr. Curry did a good job with the questions.

  • @buckleygeneration
    @buckleygeneration 2 роки тому +8

    Wow that “that’s not correct” really threw the lawyer for a loop.

  • @zuldo8577
    @zuldo8577 2 роки тому +394

    Its confirmed. Psychologists have higher IQs than attorneys.

    • @oksanceran6379
      @oksanceran6379 2 роки тому +3

      For sure THIS ONE IS. : )

    • @Amusegirl1980
      @Amusegirl1980 2 роки тому +3

      We are Jedi's my friend. I can control a conversation with ANYONE.

    • @EmpyrealEndemic
      @EmpyrealEndemic 2 роки тому +3

      Simple lawyery intimidation has no power on academics

    • @james_holder
      @james_holder 2 роки тому +1

      I think garbage truck workers have a higher IQ than Amber’s lawyers

  • @kasstty
    @kasstty 2 роки тому +1061

    When she ACTUALLY corrected the lawyer when she asked “if she read that correctly” was ICONIC. PERPETRATED

  • @thom1244
    @thom1244 2 роки тому +67

    The difference in intelligence between Dr. Curry and Amber’s lawyer is painfully obvious. All the misleading questions are being bounced back with facts. Really impressed by Dr. Curry

  • @plzleavemealone9660
    @plzleavemealone9660 2 роки тому +32

    Didn't Amber literally go to a party hosted by the judge's wife's bestie. You know, the judge that decided who was guilty in the sun's case?
    The fact that they are trying to say a witness having an interview with dinner with Johnny is somehow bad is just hilarious.

  • @vincentliang8548
    @vincentliang8548 2 роки тому +481

    what a horrible 22 minutes of watching an incompetent lawyer try to trash the credibility of a psychologist, she stood her ground and defended herself very well

    • @micheleh5269
      @micheleh5269 2 роки тому

      Her attorneys are not likeable. And understandable that a celebrity is going to want interview to be in their realm, not a restaurant or other venue

    • @user-hq8sl7om9i
      @user-hq8sl7om9i 2 роки тому

      It is very genuine that when someone's opinion is being counted then to see if they are experts or not.

    • @Lemana28021989
      @Lemana28021989 2 роки тому

      Actually she didn't nees to defend herself as she didn't do anything wrong

  • @Forever_OctobersJ
    @Forever_OctobersJ 2 роки тому +1813

    This doctor is incredible. She did not allow anyone to trick her. Amazing job. She did so well in answering questions professionally.

    • @marksteve8373
      @marksteve8373 2 роки тому +12

      Hehe that's what she does, she's a trained psychologist.. can't win against someone with such credentials.

    • @tylerkloever4442
      @tylerkloever4442 2 роки тому +1

      Did she even answer any questions? She evaded most of them.

    • @TheAceOfSpades8877
      @TheAceOfSpades8877 2 роки тому +21

      @@tylerkloever4442 she answered all of them, and even corrected the errors of Amber’s lawyer

    • @eamonpeoples222
      @eamonpeoples222 2 роки тому +2

      @@tylerkloever4442 what do you meaning?

    • @deenszxking6818
      @deenszxking6818 2 роки тому +3

      @@tylerkloever4442 How do you want to answer some question that has error in it?

  • @catooomen8238
    @catooomen8238 2 роки тому +12

    The strategy of ambers lawyers is basically just "try to discredit every witness" "show them newspaper quotes" "talk through people" "objection hearsay" and "confuse them so they'll slip up". Despicable approach honestly

  • @ivanpavlic721
    @ivanpavlic721 2 роки тому +33

    As someone with BPD, I can tell you that those lawyers got their skin torn off of their backs after this :'D
    BPD is strange and often difficult disorder that can go very sour very fast if not treated. I hope Amber finds help and I feel for Johnny for going through this whole ordeal.

  • @sonjaivovic
    @sonjaivovic 2 роки тому +1469

    All I want in my life is to be more like Dr. Curry. She killed it, her confidence didn’t sway the whole time.

    • @darianstarfrog
      @darianstarfrog 2 роки тому +25

      Don't just dream it, be it :) I believe in you, now if you do, you are unstoppable!

    • @heehoohehehe1267
      @heehoohehehe1267 2 роки тому +49

      It's not just confidence it's competence. You can be confident in something wrong, but you can't be competent using something wrong. Dr. Curry is an absolute professional, in the truest sense of the word.

    • @bubbles9766
      @bubbles9766 2 роки тому +1

      That's 15 years experience of dealing with trash lawyers, unlike what Amber's lawyer was trying to imply.

    • @Electronicalengineer
      @Electronicalengineer 2 роки тому +2

      @@heehoohehehe1267 True! Wish to be that competent honestly

    • @g.h.7661
      @g.h.7661 2 роки тому +1

      Lmao all you want in life is to be more like a psychologist from a celebrity court case?

  • @jordanxnoel
    @jordanxnoel 2 роки тому +1856

    Thank God they can’t bully a professional into saying or not saying what they wish. She’s a forensic psychologist and clearly knows more about her rights to speak than they do. They can’t cut her off the way they do Johnny.

    • @admiralboom481
      @admiralboom481 2 роки тому +2

      Jordan when are you coming past the ship for a nice lunch to see your old Admiral Boom.

    • @mollyhelmm
      @mollyhelmm 2 роки тому +35

      Oh but they will keep circling back to the dinner and drinks, you’know because that part was the most important ….

    • @helloworld2784
      @helloworld2784 2 роки тому +10

      @@mollyhelmm The muffins

    • @thomaslopez6518
      @thomaslopez6518 2 роки тому +5

      It's not professional nor is it appropriate for a forensic psychologist to be having a dinner at the client's home. It was foolish of Amber to agree to have it done. Forensic psychologists are appropriate for a crime case this is not a crime case it's a civil lawsuit. Many people fall for this thinking that the forensics psychologist is going to help exonerate them... When would a forensic psychologist does is look for pathologies. A forensic psychologist is going to find pathologies in most everyone... But people innocently take any evaluation baking and believing that it somehow will exonerate them when would it is actually designed to do regardless of who is taking it... Is to find all of their pathologies. People believe forensic psychologists are just scientists free of bias... And that what they're doing could not possibly be anything but objective science. However that is not true. Regardless of who is being tested interpretation of facts and subjective interpretation is 100% of what a forensic psychology assessment is it's merely an opinion.. regardless of who it is about...

    • @mollyhelmm
      @mollyhelmm 2 роки тому +5

      @@helloworld2784 THE MUFFINS! The bloody muffins, THE DINNER AND DRINKS. The sheer audacity of Johnny’s team for having a cool interview. ILLEGAL 😎

  • @maribelmartinez1925
    @maribelmartinez1925 2 роки тому +5

    The way the lawyer is trying to trip up a psychologist as if she can’t read her behavior

  • @k8marlowe
    @k8marlowe 2 роки тому +29

    Dr. Curry is unshakable. It’s impressive. She’s beautiful, articulate, knowledgeable- she makes a great witness. ….and Amber Heard is killing her over and over in her mind.

  • @imogenmckeever6689
    @imogenmckeever6689 2 роки тому +1545

    I love how concise this woman is, especially when the lawyer tries to incorrectly guide her opinions, and she corrects them.

  • @pedrogarcia-sn7ns
    @pedrogarcia-sn7ns 2 роки тому +2

    So many misleading questions, should’ve objected more just to spite that lawyer.

  • @wildflowers100
    @wildflowers100 Рік тому +4

    Dr Curry handled Elaine’s trash questions like such a pro!

  • @ramonafiowers5982
    @ramonafiowers5982 2 роки тому +3852

    I love how neutral she is, and the only thing she does is throw facts. That move of the defense "yOu ArE sAyInG tHiNgS iN fAvOr Of jOhNnY cAuSe YoU hAd A dInNeR wItH hIm" seemed to me like drown guy kicks.

    • @eaglewinnings8003
      @eaglewinnings8003 2 роки тому +112

      What do you expect from Caitlin Jenner doing cross questioning

    • @Tyrfingr
      @Tyrfingr 2 роки тому +83

      And whatever you do, do not forget about the muffins!

    • @ramonafiowers5982
      @ramonafiowers5982 2 роки тому +3

      @@Tyrfingr XD

    • @ladygodiva4141
      @ladygodiva4141 2 роки тому +15

      Neutral? She went to dinner and drinks at Johnny Depps house before she was employed. ‘I did not know Johnny Depp, I had seen his movies’. Contradiction, a defensive one too if you watch her response to that.

    • @universeinneverland2314
      @universeinneverland2314 2 роки тому +286

      @@ladygodiva4141 she did not know Johnny Depp personally, but she knew OF him
      I think it's pretty easy to understand the meaning of that, and the next two questions make it clear as well

  • @Joohee4
    @Joohee4 2 роки тому +391

    This woman was waaay too smart for this lawyer’s manipulations and bullying. Hopefully the jury is too.

  • @squarestanley
    @squarestanley 2 роки тому +10

    POV: You’re a lawyer that does not understand the difference between client objectives and expert opinions.
    This psychologist absolutely embarrassed her attorney. Jeez!

  • @fish0136
    @fish0136 2 роки тому +14

    “That’s not speculation!” Asking the witness about a theoretical situation… is exactly what speculation is. How is the witness supposed to know whether or not she would have been let go if her opinions didn’t match with the motives of Depp? Is she supposed to be omnipotent so that she can look at the alternate universe in which that happened? I can’t believe how the attorney doesn’t realize why this is a flawed question.

  • @censoreverything8072
    @censoreverything8072 2 роки тому +1090

    How can this attorney think her demeanor is helping Amber’s case here? This witness is clearly professional, articulate, and not combative in any way but the attorney keeps coming at her like she’s on trial for a crime. It’s a bad look and makes the defense incredibly unlikeable.

    • @hemidart7
      @hemidart7 2 роки тому +22

      A lawyers job is to do whatever it takes to win Playing dirty as well

    • @machitect
      @machitect 2 роки тому +22

      They’re desperate

    • @ryangale8736
      @ryangale8736 2 роки тому +27

      Yeah but playing dirty when you’re trying to prove you’re not abusive just seems like a bad move. The lawyer got caught withholding key information (it was an interview) from the jury. AH’s team set the precedent that they tell half truths to get a desired outcome. Quasi abusive behavior itself.

    • @Chris-qh5tz
      @Chris-qh5tz 2 роки тому +2

      Because laywers like her who have this holy-than-thou attitude aren't aware of those things.

    • @ABa-ve3ul
      @ABa-ve3ul 2 роки тому

      And highly biased

  • @Grekkenn
    @Grekkenn 2 роки тому +529

    When the Dr said "can I say what that means?" And the lawyer coldly says "no". The faces of the people in the back says it all

    • @SanaSamaha
      @SanaSamaha 2 роки тому +66

      The laughter from the crowd too. It is both unexpected for some one to be so rude and ruthless, but completely expected from Heard's legal team.

    • @goolibay
      @goolibay 2 роки тому +11

      Yeah they are like wtf hahaha

    • @fulanoide718
      @fulanoide718 2 роки тому +39

      I don't know anything about law, but what is the value of asking questions if you are the one controlling the answers that are providen. If you are asking me something and at the same time stating how much can I say then there is not value at all, it is like reading a book skipping pages.
      -Did you say this?
      + Yes I said that because...
      - I don't care, it is a yes or no question.
      Then why the f are you questioning me if you don't want a full answer.

    • @rarasmith2544
      @rarasmith2544 2 роки тому

      can you give the timestamp?

    • @abigailroxee3979
      @abigailroxee3979 2 роки тому +5

      @@rarasmith2544 13:04

  • @judyrobinson436
    @judyrobinson436 2 роки тому +1

    Wow. That lawyer needs to be assessed. She’s nuts

  • @kurdvevoofficial
    @kurdvevoofficial 2 роки тому +8

    Johnny is so brave to tell his side of the story,And she just looks so guilty sitting there.

  • @dannymartial7997
    @dannymartial7997 2 роки тому +1233

    The lawyer's questions are so bad, the jury is probably laughing at the pathetic attempt off camera.

    • @LindaC616
      @LindaC616 2 роки тому +12

      Lol once their heads stop spinning

    • @briane173
      @briane173 2 роки тому +25

      Depp and his team were, that's for certain.

    • @wendyhardin5259
      @wendyhardin5259 2 роки тому +9

      And the lawyer is very ill prepared.

    • @deltamoon2402
      @deltamoon2402 2 роки тому +2

      Seriously.

    • @louisecoleman7767
      @louisecoleman7767 2 роки тому +3

      THIS lawyer & AH are mimicking the same jacket! How quUTE!

  • @barkinghazelnuts
    @barkinghazelnuts 2 роки тому +3136

    I love this woman. So intelligent and articulate, she really knows her stuff.

    • @Brasileiro222
      @Brasileiro222 2 роки тому +8

      Yes, the woman who is asking. She's the prosecutor, right?

    • @n1kobefan
      @n1kobefan 2 роки тому +46

      @@Brasileiro222 no, that’s the woman that called multiple personality disorder a bipolar disorder. That wasn’t intelligent or articulate at all. He’s talking about the Dr that corrected her.

    • @honinakecheta601
      @honinakecheta601 2 роки тому +46

      She's beautiful too, her glasses are so stylish lol

    • @nakhashfaiz3623
      @nakhashfaiz3623 2 роки тому +1

      @@honinakecheta601 yess very

    • @HarharMahadev-bb1hi
      @HarharMahadev-bb1hi 2 роки тому +24

      And so more beautiful than AH 😅

  • @digitized_fyre
    @digitized_fyre 2 роки тому +39

    I think we can all aim to be more like Dr Curry. Her composed nature and clear stating of facts, while not letting the 'lawyers' attempts to discredit her or misrepresent the truth is impeccable and admirable.

  • @carmiecat
    @carmiecat 2 роки тому +3

    Dr. Curry is incredible. She handled this attorney’s idiocy so well! Brava!!

  • @Joseph-mw2rl
    @Joseph-mw2rl 2 роки тому +1793

    So basically, these "you were at his house" "he served you dinner" is basically trying to prove that she's chummy with johnny and is biased. That's BEYOND insulting, she's questioning the psychologist's professionalism. Even if she managed to prove that, that's an INCREDIBLY weak evidence

    • @HolyNarz
      @HolyNarz 2 роки тому +55

      Well, I think thats a strong stretegy to be honest. Of course it might be cheap, but they have to do something to put against the diagnosis of the doctor. And the best thing is to look her being biased. And even if they manage to get doubt in the jurys head, they were kinda successful.

    • @cutieworldwideee
      @cutieworldwideee 2 роки тому +46

      @@HolyNarz they were only successful in getting that into YOUR head lol

    • @HolyNarz
      @HolyNarz 2 роки тому +8

      @@cutieworldwideee Explain how are reading that out of my comment?

    • @kellogscornflakes2430
      @kellogscornflakes2430 2 роки тому +40

      @@HolyNarz Yeah asking her if she thinks Johnny Depp is a good actor as well lmfao

    • @captainhaddock6193
      @captainhaddock6193 2 роки тому +25

      Her credibility as a witness is pretty questionable if she has been having 3-4 hour dinners with him and his legal team. There is no doubt about that regardless of who you think is in the right or wrong in this case.

  • @jeffreyharris3440
    @jeffreyharris3440 2 роки тому +544

    Wow, how insulting it is to think that a professional can be "purchased" or "influenced" by sharing a meal.

    • @user-su6zt2of2p
      @user-su6zt2of2p 2 роки тому +9

      She was referring to a private meal where she might've been offered something more.

    • @missmew3499
      @missmew3499 2 роки тому +32

      Oh, but it wasn't a "meal". It was "dinner and drinks" 🤔🤔😂😂

    • @karishmadesai1408
      @karishmadesai1408 2 роки тому +81

      To me it's just basic manners to offer food and drinks when you invite someone for a meeting. That lawyer is reaching by trying to make it sound like a bribe 😂

    • @MirrorOfEmotions
      @MirrorOfEmotions 2 роки тому +21

      @@karishmadesai1408
      Furthermore she cut everytimes in if the doctor tried to explain a circumstance more precisly.
      That's just awful and unprofessionell. (well at least in my eyes)

    • @liliamayes3176
      @liliamayes3176 2 роки тому +3

      @@karishmadesai1408 duh, people making out like they had a party

  • @wtrgypsy4533
    @wtrgypsy4533 Рік тому +4

    I loved this lady. So cool, so professional. She had Elaine flapping around like a freshly landed trout. Right near the end, about 22:06 there's a wonderful wtaf moment.... the slow blink and tiny shake of her head... Elaine is about to launch into 'muffin-gate'. This is one of my favourite moments and the point where I got hooked on this trial. It was the first real insight for me into just how little AH's team actually had.

  • @pistollips
    @pistollips 2 роки тому +12

    bi polar and bpd are two entirely different things. the fact that amber's lawyers don't know that just proves how bad they are at their jobs

  • @wigglispaghetti7634
    @wigglispaghetti7634 2 роки тому +497

    “This dinner and drinks” “it was an interview but dinner and drinks were served” “so at this dinner before you were hired” “ I wasn’t hired because it was an interview” dude this made me so mad like why are they trying so hard to incriminate her

    • @Queen_KRoy
      @Queen_KRoy 2 роки тому +7

      Just because AH gets movies like that doesn't mean psychologists resort to the same.

    • @officialmusicvibes9769
      @officialmusicvibes9769 2 роки тому

      @@Queen_KRoy well the thing is we tend to see the world the way we are inside ourselves so...
      That tells a lot when trying to incriminate someone exterior ourselves of something or things that we would actually be able to do ourselves

    • @ms.debbie7415
      @ms.debbie7415 2 роки тому +1

      because she wants $100 million from him.

    • @kadeelacayo4806
      @kadeelacayo4806 2 роки тому

      Just trying to discredit her

    • @Alchemista420
      @Alchemista420 2 роки тому +2

      My brain cells....😣😣😭😭😩😩🥺🥺 Trying to imply that Dr Curry had dinner and drinks with Mr Depp in however many ways that lawyer tried to say it... made me want to peel my face off...

  • @bpxl53yewz29
    @bpxl53yewz29 2 роки тому +565

    Her attorney is so rude to the judge: “That’s not speculation”, after the judge said it was.

    • @LuhNuba
      @LuhNuba 2 роки тому +43

      Ongg like who do you think you are woman?

    • @DingoDyce
      @DingoDyce 2 роки тому +69

      "but it goes to bias"... Judge is like, I heard you. I said no. Move on.

    • @Janellabelle
      @Janellabelle 2 роки тому +11

      Well the judge sustained the objection so...lol

    • @anayarey
      @anayarey 2 роки тому +24

      The attorney is rude period not just to the judge

    • @JacobNintendoNerd99
      @JacobNintendoNerd99 2 роки тому

      The attorney getting shut down was so satisfying to see her stammer that in all honesty. She wouldn't have started "B-B-But that's not speculation" if that objection didn't monkey wrench one of the last avenues available to her to try and trash this psychologist's reputation.

  • @georgeyoung4292
    @georgeyoung4292 Рік тому +1

    She is out of her mind and her lawyers are absolutelly ridiculous cause you cant discredit this kind of Expertise🤦‍♂️

  • @h.boylen6334
    @h.boylen6334 Рік тому +2

    I love how Elaine asks these smug questions and then gets shot down by objections, it cracks me up. She is about as smart as her client.

  • @amandapitts9399
    @amandapitts9399 2 роки тому +1506

    Dr. Shannon Curry is such an intelligent and patient woman. She spoke with candor and composure. Amber’s lawyer tried to have many “gotcha” moments but it didn’t work. How can a lawyer question a psychologist in their field? The way Amber’s lawyer spoke to Dr.curry was volatile.

    • @jmoz
      @jmoz 2 роки тому +15

      *vile

    • @catherinel.rosewood2095
      @catherinel.rosewood2095 2 роки тому +88

      Better question is how can that lawyer think they can psychologically outsmart someone living in that field with years of experience

    • @kvngyoun
      @kvngyoun 2 роки тому +4

      volatile? lol

    • @iinsomniaaaaa
      @iinsomniaaaaa 2 роки тому +3

      @@kvngyoun I'm guessing autocorrect from vile for some reason

    • @gardeniagorgeous4232
      @gardeniagorgeous4232 2 роки тому +10

      It’s not as important as her patience and intelligence, but she’s a beautiful woman too!

  • @kam0406
    @kam0406 2 роки тому +412

    It is clear this woman was not at Depp's house on a personal visit. This line of questioning is exhaustive.

    • @kadeelacayo4806
      @kadeelacayo4806 2 роки тому +33

      Right calling it a dinner over and over

    • @heehoohehehe1267
      @heehoohehehe1267 2 роки тому +57

      She's wording it like it's a date, instead of an appointment. It fails miserably.

    • @WhiteWolf--
      @WhiteWolf-- 2 роки тому +15

      "Dinner and drinks", trying to make it sound like they busted out the Cristal and MDMA and partied the night away its ridiculous

    • @CarrieBiggerstaff
      @CarrieBiggerstaff 2 роки тому +5

      Then the lawyer asked… Why are you resisting that question? Why won’t you answer it?
      Like… She really had to ask that? Lol