Next Gen Falcon 9 | Demonstration Flight

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2013
  • At 9:00 a.m. PDT on September 29, 2013, the upgraded Falcon 9 rocket lifted off from Vandenberg Air Force Base on a successful demonstration mission delivering the CASSIOPE satellite to orbit.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 247

  • @janselkennethtolentino8269
    @janselkennethtolentino8269 7 років тому +48

    Looks so different without those legs. Landing legs

  • @jonasferencz8569
    @jonasferencz8569 10 років тому +46

    if you showed the people from the middle ages this they probably would think it was a real dragon

    • @NobleSteed00
      @NobleSteed00 6 років тому +2

      of all the dragons this is the only real one

  • @blazintitan277
    @blazintitan277 10 років тому +21

    Is it weird that I love the sound of blast off from 0:16 to 0:50?

    • @funkdahmental
      @funkdahmental 10 років тому +3

      no i fking love it too

    • @Ionizap
      @Ionizap 10 років тому +2

      Check out some of the vids of shuttle launches. They are awesome when piped throughout a decent home entertainment system. I sometimes play at volumes that the neighbours probably can hear. I think there might be some good vids/sound of Saturn V launches also.

    • @beanacomputer
      @beanacomputer 9 років тому

      ***** Atlas V launches are also pretty great, and the Delta IV (especially Heavy variant... oh baby)

    • @GeniusGaming112
      @GeniusGaming112 3 роки тому

      you mean lift off?

  • @TeamPotatooo
    @TeamPotatooo 10 років тому

    If you notice, you will see that as the rocket gets higher, the light from the engine gets larger. That is because the engine exhaust is expanding further sideways due to a drop in pressure.

  • @BrianRossman
    @BrianRossman 10 років тому

    Delta-V is a product of the weight of the payload so that isn't constant from launch to launch. From the Wikipedia page for the Falcon9: the first stage packs a total thrust of 5,885 kN. And its using good old RP-1 and LOX.

  • @R000win
    @R000win 10 років тому

    Can't wait for some sort of info or hopefully even video of first stage!

  • @thisisnotajoke
    @thisisnotajoke 10 років тому

    The stage separation is exactly as it was during the live stream. They had problems with the video link and there where many "awaiting vehicle downlink" screens during the launch, one during separation.
    That ring at 2:26 is a "stiffener" for the ablative carbon nozzle extension of the vacuum Merlin, it is there to prevent any damage to the nozzle due to vibrations during launch. It is no longer needed once the engine fires and comes off because the heat "destroys" the glue.

  • @kurtkomraus
    @kurtkomraus 10 років тому +1

    congratulations....nice launch yesterday!

  • @Ergzay
    @Ergzay 10 років тому

    If you're talking about the white venting on the side of the rocket near the bottom then it's liquid oxygen boil off. Liquid oxygen is the oxidizer portion of the kerosene + liquid oxygen rocket fuel. It is super cold and so is constantly boiling away. They have to vent it out of the tanks or the tanks would eventually explode from too much pressure.

  • @bmo2pa
    @bmo2pa 10 років тому +1

    They did. It slowed itself enough to get back into the atmosphere without any damage. Unfortunately, once back in the atmosphere it started spinning and that centrifuged the fuel so it couldn't maintain the burn.
    Elon stated that the next flight will have hardware to prevent spins, but they learned a lot from the flight.

  • @queazocotal
    @queazocotal 10 років тому

    It did work! Getting low enough to crash into the ocean and not break up earlier is actually major progress! It proves that the hypersonic reentry works - grasshopper basically demonstrated the hard part.
    This is basically just grasshopper, with a somewhat taller vehicle, once you're near the sea.
    Admittedly - the hydroplanes on the side, and deep throttling of the engine, so that it can get up on the step, and plane home are new.

  • @darkfur18
    @darkfur18 10 років тому +11

    THIS is the next step in space travel. It's time for NASA to make room...

    • @user-lv7ph7hs7l
      @user-lv7ph7hs7l 6 років тому +4

      NASA still does incredible stuff. And the lower launch costs will allow to do them more amazing stuff. Nuclear powered flying robot at Titan was just selected as a possible missions along with a sample return from 67p.

    • @compmanio36
      @compmanio36 3 роки тому +4

      @@user-lv7ph7hs7l Yep NASA is great when they are planning missions and thinking long term goals. Leaving the actual rocket building and launching to private companies like SpaceX helps cut costs, increase performance and reliability and avoids the endless bureaucracy that NASA got bogged down with when it came to the Shuttle and other launch programs. NASA and private industry should be working together in a free market to get us to space as a regular venture, instead of the closed market cronyism we got with the moon missions and later with the Shuttle.

  • @SuperFactsonly
    @SuperFactsonly 10 років тому

    Wow, can't wait for that event. Thanks.

  • @aegystierone8505
    @aegystierone8505 10 років тому

    Wow I never thought of that, thanks for explaining!

  • @datathunderstorm
    @datathunderstorm 9 років тому

    Firefly...!!! The glow of that engine reminds me of the main propulsion unit on the "Serenity" from the TV series "Firefly"...!!! :)

  • @nimbusbuster
    @nimbusbuster 10 років тому

    It was basically a brand new rocket. New engines, new engine mounting scheme, larger fuel tanks, new sub systems, new inter-stage, new 2nd stage fairing, etc, etc.. Honestly, it was quite tense at mission control before the launch.

  • @lonfas2
    @lonfas2 10 років тому

    Max Q at t+ 91 secs.
    Max Q for space shuttle at t+ 73 secs.
    Thanks for the showngo EM!!
    Space operations done right.

  • @glolab1155
    @glolab1155 10 років тому +1

    This is lovely! Its so inspiring Space X! i have been into rocket research and then, so far, i have fired six rockets, and i success ( solid boosters only). I am a Nigerian. I have always had the dreams and plans of running my own space program, and i will by the grace of God! Keep up the good work people! I am sooo proud of your innovations and reengineering techniques! Not far from my ideas too! Indeed great minds think alike! Cheers people! (Thumbs up)

  • @Alex_ADEdge
    @Alex_ADEdge 10 років тому

    Great video, looks like a few bits are still missing though, pity we dont get to see stage separation super-clearly happen. Such a good launch though, cant wait for the 1st stage video - well done SpaceX!

  • @piranha031091
    @piranha031091 10 років тому +2

    I wish we could have the full view from the first stage, to see its landing attempt!

  • @Tmccreight25Gaming
    @Tmccreight25Gaming 4 роки тому

    Now THATS the Falcon 9 I know and love!

  • @anothermoth
    @anothermoth 10 років тому

    A full KSP instrument overlay would be so cool.

  • @Ergzay
    @Ergzay 10 років тому

    They didn't know whether the thing would blow up on the pad or not make it to orbit. They changed a whole crap load of things between this and the previous launch. Lots of improvements to tank design, engine configuration, tank size, etc. They also had a very very small satellite on board that was originally to launch on a Falcon 1.

  • @pivendren
    @pivendren 10 років тому

    We caught a glimpse of the launch here in South Africa :D

  • @9malls
    @9malls 10 років тому

    Very cool video!

  • @JimFeig
    @JimFeig 10 років тому

    I want to see the separation that got cut out. And the altitude and speed would be great. And maybe some 3D if your feeling creative?
    And some annotation of the little bits that fall off would be great so we can learn to interpret what we are seeing. Specifically at 2:26 the ring that comes off the second stage.

  • @jsjsnjhh
    @jsjsnjhh 10 років тому

    I think it´s so amazing that we can do such awesome stuff.. =]

  • @tammyleederwhitaker649
    @tammyleederwhitaker649 4 роки тому

    This is such an exciting time 😍

  • @qup5
    @qup5 10 років тому

    The amount of delta-v depends on the weight of the payload. F9 V1.1 can send around 13t to LEO, which is about 9.3 km/s delta-v.

  • @JesperMlgaard
    @JesperMlgaard 10 років тому

    Thanks for using the metric system.

  • @aegystierone8505
    @aegystierone8505 10 років тому

    Looking forward to the coming launch then!

  • @jsjsnjhh
    @jsjsnjhh 10 років тому

    yes, but this stuff has to be incredibly dark, as it is expanding really really fast after exiting the nozzle( there was another video where you could see the exhaust gases forming a huge "shield" behind the rocket because they expanded so fast)

  • @aloisrenard
    @aloisrenard 10 років тому

    Yeah in fact it could be awesome to have a page with several major data indicators in pair with the live video stream.

  • @lonfas2
    @lonfas2 10 років тому

    With the reliability and safety of flight status of the Dragon program, unicorns or no unicorns, I would strap myself to that candle any damn day of the week.

  • @roidroid
    @roidroid 10 років тому

    @5:10 (to the right of the nozzle) the debris being vapourized, with the tail facing away from the rocket. This would be a good footage clip to help explain to students what the solar wind is and what it does to comets.

  • @thisisnotajoke
    @thisisnotajoke 10 років тому

    yes, they cut out all the "awaiting vehicle downlink" screens that occurred during launch.

  • @postal2600
    @postal2600 10 років тому +1

    Meaning fuel pressure, thrust levels, acceleration, EVERYTHING :)

  • @nimbusbuster
    @nimbusbuster 10 років тому

    its just O_2. Liquid Oxygen (LOx) is pumped into the tank right before launch and since the boiling temperature is well below ambient room temperature, you have to vent the gas to avoid pressure building up in the tank.

  • @BrianRossman
    @BrianRossman 10 років тому

    From the post some place that the 1st stage was reignited twice but picked up a spin that made the fuel unavailable to the engine so the soft landing didn't work, then again they didn't expect it to.

  • @PaulKlinger
    @PaulKlinger 10 років тому

    No, the Merlin 1D engine (and all previous SpaceX engines) was developed in-house in the united states.
    You may be thinking of the Orbital Sciences Antares rocket which indeed uses modified russian NK-33/AJ26 engines (they are more powerful and efficient but also more expensive and harder to manufacture).

  • @Jbroglydecap
    @Jbroglydecap 10 років тому

    That rocket nozzle looks pretty hot!)))

  • @nimbusbuster
    @nimbusbuster 10 років тому

    I'll concede that the R&D would have been slowed in the beggining, but they are now starting to turn a corner in that the contracts on the launch manifests are covering cost of operation. The reason they paid only 20% is because F9v 1.1 had to be demonstrated with our without a payload. To help absorb some of the cost to the company, a discount was offered to anyone who wanted to ride along. Remember, this is a brand new vehicle with redesigned engines, avionic hardware/software, & new substems

  • @badaboomrock
    @badaboomrock 10 років тому

    Great Job SpaceX Team I can't wait until you start launching the Falcon Heavy. :)

  • @ScottHodgins29
    @ScottHodgins29 10 років тому

    Judging by human history, the space age is inevitable. Despite a person's personal feelings on the subject, humans have never ignored opportunity, and Space presents an opportunity that dwarfs everything we've done up until now.

  • @donutey
    @donutey 10 років тому

    A lot of engineering stuff ends up using customary units (ie feet, pounds) due to incorporating or interfacing with older, non-metric, systems. Spacex has the advantage in that they are using a clean-sheet design and are vertically integrated.

  • @anothermoth
    @anothermoth 10 років тому

    The engines are run rich (more fuel than can be burnt by the oxidiser used), partly because a stoichiometric mix would burn too hot, partly because the hydrocarbons are lighter than oxygen so you get better specific impulse that way. Low in the atmosphere the excess fuel burns in the air. Higher up, there isn't enough ambient oxygen to burn it and it makes soot instead.

  • @jsjsnjhh
    @jsjsnjhh 10 років тому

    Question: why are the exhaust gases in space so deep black?

  • @jamdev12
    @jamdev12 10 років тому

    What I would like to find out is, what was this upgrade for? What does it improve over the last Falcon 9 rocket? Is it cheaper to manufacturer, more efficient than the last?

  • @beep61
    @beep61 10 років тому

    Nice, next up landing demo.

  • @SuperFactsonly
    @SuperFactsonly 10 років тому

    When can we expect a reusable Falcon rocket Grasshopper test into Orbit (if that makes any sense?

  • @Tmccreight25Gaming
    @Tmccreight25Gaming 4 роки тому

    Look at how far SpaceX has come, from worrying that every flight could be the last, barely able to reach orbit. To holding a significant portion of the commercial space transportation market and having the only partially-reusable launch system flying today.

  • @nimbusbuster
    @nimbusbuster 10 років тому

    It was solid oxygen from the vents that burned off in the MVac exhaust.

  • @FutureMartian97
    @FutureMartian97 10 років тому

    Great flight, though the external camera could've been aimed just a tiny bit higher in my opinion.

  • @lolmandos
    @lolmandos 10 років тому

    How was the glacier volume last time you checked, sir? And when was it?
    Return to me with some data and we'll speak.

  • @mfk12340
    @mfk12340 10 років тому

    How much delta-v does that rocket have? What type of fuel, hydrogen with the other thing or something else?

  • @Jbroglydecap
    @Jbroglydecap 10 років тому

    Were did you study aerospace and physics? Zimbabwe?

  • @NavyGuy2OO7
    @NavyGuy2OO7 10 років тому

    I thought they were also going to do a test with the spent First stage and attempt to do a controlled landing in the water?

  • @softrockification
    @softrockification 10 років тому

    Is falcon 9 the name of the whole vehicle or just the launch stage?

  • @fred3000
    @fred3000 10 років тому

    i want to see the onboard view of the first stage reignition, even if it didnt work out :(

  • @fuckyorutube
    @fuckyorutube 10 років тому

    The first stage was broken ?

  • @JamesTorrey
    @JamesTorrey 10 років тому

    What made this one a demonstration?

  • @ByrdmanAero
    @ByrdmanAero 10 років тому

    Brand new rocket (V1.1 has new engines, is longer on the first stage), new fairing system, new second stage engine, new launch pad, first time going into polar orbit which is much harder than a equatorial prograde orbit.

  • @SuperSloth328
    @SuperSloth328 10 років тому

    Is this a re-upload?

  • @turnerhunt2508
    @turnerhunt2508 10 років тому +1

    If/When first stage comes back and stands up on terra firma and engine cuts and plume clears to reveal an intact readily reusable first stage - it will seem like pure magic - but as Arthur C Clarke once said, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic".

  • @porovaara
    @porovaara 10 років тому

    Nice job peoples!

  • @unematrix
    @unematrix 10 років тому

    what does KSP have to do with it though?

  • @chaadlosan
    @chaadlosan 10 років тому +1

    Another flawless flight congratulations Elon and to all the Space X team!!!

  • @ArduinoMan101
    @ArduinoMan101 10 років тому

    Was there someone in the rocket?

  • @SargeRho
    @SargeRho 10 років тому

    Its own exhaust plume is significantly faster than supersonic. I think it has an exhaust velocity around 4500m/s

  • @duncanedwards036
    @duncanedwards036 10 років тому

    They did you just haven't seen it yet. Word has it that it was partially successful but they met their goals with it. Elon said they would try to have some video of it later.

  • @ESPkenner48
    @ESPkenner48 10 років тому

    what is CCHP?

  • @JackONeill497
    @JackONeill497 10 років тому

    They do mention the altitude every once in a while.

  • @ashleycoleman6522
    @ashleycoleman6522 10 років тому

    that is so cool... I would love to work at spacex !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @WishMasterLP
    @WishMasterLP 10 років тому

    What is that weird thing at 5:09?

  • @tammyleederwhitaker649
    @tammyleederwhitaker649 4 роки тому

    Congrats with Starlink ✨

  • @postal2600
    @postal2600 10 років тому +1

    Actually, full telemetry would be orgasmic :D

  • @Jbroglydecap
    @Jbroglydecap 10 років тому

    IN 100 years, everybody will own there own personal space plane

  • @ByrdmanAero
    @ByrdmanAero 10 років тому

    More thrust, more payload capability. The engines are more powerful and slightly more efficient, the "octoweb" arrangement of engines is more efficient and stable, and the increased tank length gives it increased payload capacity.

  • @devwreck192
    @devwreck192 10 років тому

    Epic win for humanity and for the free market. I

  • @OrbitTechNews
    @OrbitTechNews 10 років тому

    Another great milestone!!!!
    Now, take us to MARS!

  • @nimbusbuster
    @nimbusbuster 10 років тому

    I can guarantee you that all Engines were design, tested, and made in the US.

  • @CognitiveMachine
    @CognitiveMachine 10 років тому

    If they really, really manage to bring the next rocket down with a quite splash rather than a loud smash, than the Mars mission (and colonization program) would be so much closer, it takes my breath away.
    Oh man, most people don't even understand the scope of whats happening!
    Its historical! More than that!

  • @NavyGuy2OO7
    @NavyGuy2OO7 10 років тому

    ahhh I got ya, Ok, I remember reading that they were expecting failures along the way but it was a spent stage going to crash into the water anyways.

  • @josealexandrereis
    @josealexandrereis 10 років тому

    When they simulated on the Kerbal Space Program the spining it made no difference to the fuel.. that's why they did't anticipated it as a problem

  • @MrPolymath0
    @MrPolymath0 10 років тому

    It was very nominal.

  • @datpolakmike
    @datpolakmike 10 років тому

    Even after all these decades, aerospace technology is still relatively primitive, hell, just putting aircraft back on the ground is a somewhat tricky and dangerous manoeuvre

  • @No.............
    @No............. 10 років тому

    Are the kerbals Okay?

  • @anothermoth
    @anothermoth 10 років тому

    Flying backwards supersonic into it's own exhaust plume - that i want to see. Would be even better if they have telescope tracking shots, but maybe that's too much to hope for.

  • @Muonium1
    @Muonium1 10 років тому

    was that nozzle on the right spraying diarrhea on the launch pad for some reason?

  • @BrianRossman
    @BrianRossman 10 років тому

    The R&D money that they are getting as part of the CCDev and other ongoing NASA efforts is important to them still. This was a test flight more than anything else. In an interview Elon Musk said customer paid about 20% of what the normal launch fee would have been. So while they wouldn't shut down, they would not be able to function as normal. A lot of their development would be drastically slowed.

  • @Major.Tom.1973
    @Major.Tom.1973 10 років тому

    Wow well done to SpaceX !

  • @Acheron538
    @Acheron538 10 років тому

    Probably because there is nothing (or little to nothing) to dilute the byproducts of whatever propelled the rockets. It appears to be black because it is obstructing far more light than the surrounding environment, which the cameras have automatically adjusted to compensate for.

  • @MyWillyboi
    @MyWillyboi 10 років тому

    @1:20 already 1,000 MPH 4460m/s WOWZERS

  • @josealexandrereis
    @josealexandrereis 10 років тому

    they had no idea the rocket was coming down on a spiral.. that's why the engine shutdown because all the fuel was on the walls and not on the bottom to be pumped to the engine.. on the Kerbal Space Program simulator that doesn't matter, if you have fuel you will burn it

  • @USAFDaedalus
    @USAFDaedalus 10 років тому

    Bill was in the secondary payload.

  • @Jbroglydecap
    @Jbroglydecap 10 років тому

    How can i be mad when the future for the rest of us looks so bright))
    "yup"? I am glad we agree on something...

  • @leerman22
    @leerman22 10 років тому

    At least you didn't kill any Kerbals.

  • @TechieJock4118
    @TechieJock4118 10 років тому

    Me Too!

  • @Blakey478
    @Blakey478 10 років тому

    Elon Musk is truly a great man, we shall see some fascinating technologies a lot of us never thought was possible in our lifetime. I strive to work for this man when I graduate.

  • @PaulKlinger
    @PaulKlinger 10 років тому

    No, with this launch they now have a launch vehicle that is competitive on the commercial market. While the NASA contracts are still important, they can survive without them.