Anyone who knows the complexity of physiological systems and let alone neurophysiological systems will know that there is no way they could have randomly fallen into place even over a gazillion years. They all shout DESIGN!
Natural selection is a non-random process that selects traits that incur differential reproductive success. The mutation process is random, but the adaptation process is not. Understanding this difference is critical, or else you may be inclined to generate a "God of the Gaps" fallacy. Ex) It may be random for mice to be brown or black, but it is not random that black mice are more plentiful near black volcanic soil. This trait was likely selected because it reduced predation. Likewise, we usually only see evolutionary successes and not failures, so it makes sense that we see mechanisms that appear "flawless" (though usually, they do have drawbacks or restrictions, think of the LSO vs MSO auditory localization system, made to compensate for the insufficiency of hair cells to repolarize quickly enough above 3Hz). We only see black mice because all the brown mice died out.
@@Im0nJupiter thanks for the explanation. My thought was not that it is natural to believe in presence of creator because of we are merely adapted to our environment BUT that the complexity of this adaptation is something to begin with searching for answers about if it is possible for the mere selection to do so alone. Not related to the topic, what was there in the beginning (beginning of everything)? Just atoms in shapeless matter? if so then what created that matter? is it found by its own? Again, really pleasure talking with u. Hope I and u find out the truth one day.
Thank you so much for this! Saved me a lot of time trying to figure that out from my lecture's slides.
And someone says the creation is random. IDK but logically this is flawless system that indicates nothing is random
Anyone who knows the complexity of physiological systems and let alone neurophysiological systems will know that there is no way they could have randomly fallen into place even over a gazillion years. They all shout DESIGN!
Natural selection is a non-random process that selects traits that incur differential reproductive success. The mutation process is random, but the adaptation process is not. Understanding this difference is critical, or else you may be inclined to generate a "God of the Gaps" fallacy.
Ex) It may be random for mice to be brown or black, but it is not random that black mice are more plentiful near black volcanic soil. This trait was likely selected because it reduced predation.
Likewise, we usually only see evolutionary successes and not failures, so it makes sense that we see mechanisms that appear "flawless" (though usually, they do have drawbacks or restrictions, think of the LSO vs MSO auditory localization system, made to compensate for the insufficiency of hair cells to repolarize quickly enough above 3Hz). We only see black mice because all the brown mice died out.
I never believed in God until I started dissecting human cadavers during pre-med school.
@@Im0nJupiter thanks for the explanation. My thought was not that it is natural to believe in presence of creator because of we are merely adapted to our environment BUT that the complexity of this adaptation is something to begin with searching for answers about if it is possible for the mere selection to do so alone. Not related to the topic, what was there in the beginning (beginning of everything)? Just atoms in shapeless matter? if so then what created that matter? is it found by its own?
Again, really pleasure talking with u. Hope I and u find out the truth one day.
"flawless" 😂 the way we discovered a whole bunch of these was due to all the flaws because this system keeps breaking down