2:01:23 First, Dr. Amar posits Antonio Scalia was “unserious” and now he emphatically asserts the current Court is trying grab more power for itself as if he has any evidence whatsoever. What a shame, I actually respected this guy up until this lecture.
43:38 If a law is too specific so as to "hinder progress", then you revise or annex the existing law through Congress. This sounds like Living Constitutionalist propaganda.
Don’t go to this school, but I love free knowledge
2:01:23 First, Dr. Amar posits Antonio Scalia was “unserious” and now he emphatically asserts the current Court is trying grab more power for itself as if he has any evidence whatsoever. What a shame, I actually respected this guy up until this lecture.
43:38 If a law is too specific so as to "hinder progress", then you revise or annex the existing law through Congress. This sounds like Living Constitutionalist propaganda.