Funny to see a 1960s jet fighter landing on a Lexington-class aircraft carrier that was decomissioned in 1945. What about making larger CVs for modern jets?
@@Leon_der_Luftige you're a Russian tank crewman having a sandwich on the steps of the Riechstag You look up and there is a Lexington class aircraft carrier on the river And you think to yourself "Babushka put too much vodka on sandwich again"
Yep, have been trying to get one for 3-4 weeks now. Got one two weeks ago, but the game bugged and didn't give me takeoff boost, and I crashed. +8min crewlock for maximum annoyance.
I still have PTSD from my first game playing swordfish in RB a few years ago... my first map was the English Channel, took about 30 minutes to get across and as soon as I was over France I got shot down mercilessly
@@Lightning_aus its a fun plane,one of the best low teir kites but it gives players bad habits that fly it too much...and....a few well flown Corsairs can destroy an entire team of zekes
A7M2 is a fun upgrade tho: not AS nimble, but still really danged floaty, AND it has more speed, climb, firepower, and survival... and access to aerial mines that travel at a snail like 230m/s in exchange for the ability to explode and damage on a miss, and with as much HE as a Sidewinder
Ikr I just wanna be able to takeoff using a F9F-2/5 I mean... they were designed in mind to takeoff without a catapult. Thats why they have injection WEP. but they can’t in war thunder.
Even our present WW2 Carriers are about 1/2-scale. Look at pictures of Hellcat fighters three abreast on the Lexington, or B-25's two abreast with wings over lapped only, to see how small our CV Models are. A major patch, up-sizing our CV's and adding the British, Japanese, and German(proposal) models would be a fantastic inclusion in a future update for Naval Warfare in War Thunder. Perhaps included with some update finally adding the Battleships every one is breathing heavy over?
@@aperson325 Yeah now if only I actually got maps with them when I flew my Naval fighters instead of fighting US+Japan over Britain alongside the Russians and Germans.
The German premium variant is straight up better than the British one as it's at the same BR with the same flight performance but it has sidewinders. Perfectly balanced as all things should be.
@@TheDrummingWarrior Because the British Sea Hawk is the original one and also a naval fighter. The original producing country should at least be mentioned.
@@i-40282 They did a similar thing with the Centurion family video, where they started the video looking at the Swedish Centurion variants and what requirements the Swedes had, instead of looking at the interesting story as to how the British finally got the idea of a universal tank, or a main battle tank.
Gaijin: Finally we're at the very top or the last rank. The aircraft that is standing out the most here or in our opinion is the F-4EJ. **FGR 2 wants to know your location.**
It is heartening to see the right amount of attention given the F6F Hellcat, and lack of attention given the Corsair. The Corsair was a superb land based fighter and attack aircraft, but was unable to operate from Carriers until the British developed a landing system for their Corsairs, and gave it to the US. The F6F Hellcats, flown by Navy and Marine Corp Pilots remained the only Naval Fighter in the Pacific onboard Carriers, until early 1945. The Hellcat was designed after study of a captured Zero fighter. When introduced, it could outclimb, out-roll, out dive and outrun, the Japanese A6M5 variants that saw any action at all. If the Hellcat could drag a Zero into a high-speed turn (nearing 300mph) or climbing right turn, the Hellcat could out-turn the Zero purely on horsepower, boosted controls and seating position. Japan's later A7M variants would never see action owing to many factors. This is why the Hellcat got over 5000 kills during WW2; it was the most numerous naval fighter plane out there over the water. Marine Corp pilots used the Hellcat and Corsair with consummate skill in both air and attack roles, as is the duty of VMF units, but only USMC Hellcat's flew from Carriers till early '45. So the Corsair had a prettier face or had the star-quality the war-time movie makers wanted. Later Movie and TV shows would make the F4U a legend. But, it's uglier and slightly larger older sister, the F6F Hellcat, carried the Navy family through most of the War. She would star only in "Hellcat's of the Navy", with John Wayne, in the story of the beginning of USMC Fighter Close Air Support doctrine. JustWill, writer, amateur aviation historian, and non-rated aviation enthusiast. Oh, and three-time winner of the permanent Chat-ban as well.
The Japanese F-4EJ Phantom is not and will never be a carrier based fighter, for its entire operating life it was land based and never used from a carrier. Just because it keeps the tail hook (which many USAF designs have for emergency landings) does not make it a carrier fighter.
That's super obvious when you consider the country that had that variant has no Carriers of their own to use them from, I'm sure if they did have CVs they would've used it for naval operations....
I personally would have picked the F6F-5N over the basic F6F-5, as the additional 20mm cannons and radar give it a clear advantage over its predecessor, plus it has the same A2G loadout so you're not losing anything there.
Im ass at the game so that heavyness was God sent. I was able to take head ons and eat roundd long enough for help to arrive and make it bacj to base to repair. In my eyes its one of ny favorite planes ive played so farr guvin im only at teir 3 with the americans and am fsirly nee to the game
When you talk about the Buffalo, an infamous failure in the Navy, instead of the Wildcat which had an excellent combat record. At least the other Grummans got in.
Suggestion: 'Rank does not matter.' What piece of Ground Force tech from each nation it most capable of fighting above its current BR, and why you may considering holding onto them as you progress further through the tree?
The British non premium variant is at the same BR with the same performance, but has no air to air missiles. Perfectly balanced as all things should be.
@@flyingkiwi7560 yeah ı wonder what could Fairey birds could achieve ıf they were not spoiled by admiralty.Wish they will add Seafire I-IV,Sea Hurricane II series
I love how 90% of the time I play naval aircraft I'm put into a landlocked map. I'd love some modern AC carriers for the jets like my F-4C and proper bases for waterbourne AC to land, repair, and rearm. Having to belly land my boats on land kinda takes a bit of the realism out of realistic battles, y'know? Thank you.
My fav Naval fighters is F6F-5N, that because Hellcats is my fav fighters in ww2, i use Hellcats so much in Tanks until i get P-47M and Ad-4 and still use her in Naval. The Capability of carrying wide variation of rockets, bombs, even Torpedo makes it an excellent fighter to use in mixed battle and it have radar, and boy i really like to use it in Simukator and surprised attack even Me-262 with it, it also quite durable, one time i was chasing Ju-288 in simulator, after i shot it down i just realized that i lost half of my wing, so bassicaly i chase that Ju-288 with half wing.
I am of the opinion that the A7M1 and A7M2 are absolutely the best fighters in the game period. Their guns put a serious hurting on the enemy, they handle extremely well, they're plenty fast, they are fantastic energy fighters, fantastic turn fighters and their climb rate is exceptional.
Favorite naval plane? Probably the F9F Panther. I've always been a fan of Grumman designs, and the F9F certainly didn't disappoint me. Not like the channel would actually acknowledge anyone's opinion or anything...
one aircarft not yet in WT and changed naval strategy is the harrier jump jet used in the falklands by the royal navy in 1982 against french made mirages and american made sky hawks
Interesting how they listed the F-4E as a "naval fighter" when that version of the Phantom never saw a carrier deck in its life. Just because a fighter has a tailhook doesn't mean it's automatically a naval fighter; look at the F-15 and F-16; they both have them, yet are dedicated land-based fighters.
Considering Japan had no carriers to put their naval capable fighter on it's obvious they've never seen one in real life operations, but the fact a plane is totally capable of naval operations gives that as part of it's designation. It's like saying the B7A2 isn't a naval bomber because the only carrier that could launch it was destroyed before they could operate.
@@Ko_Kasumi The difference between the B7A2 and the F-4E is that the B7A2 was designed to operate from carriers, the F-4E isn't; it may be able to land on a carrier, but it won't be able to be launched off it since it lacks equipment to use the catapults.
@@Orca19904 Depending on the power to weight of the plane it could be possible to launch without a catapult, actually there are modern carriers that don't have a catapult system and instead just use a slight ramp
Me, a Japanese player, sees video title: " oh finally our time to shine!" Video: Showcases...two Japanese naval fighter and the rest are practically Americans Me: "Fffffuuuuu-"
To be fair there weren't many natal fighters for Japan (A5M, A6M, and the never deployed A7M) while there is a bunch of em (F2F, F3F, F4F, F4U, F6F, after war jets) for the Americans
@@StevieTheBush " ITS NOT ABOUT NUMBERS , ITS ABOUT QUALITY !" Ah yes, go say that to the F6F with a ratio of 11:1 during WWII. After 41 the Zero was just a joke for the US, it's not surprising to only see the A7M and not the other Zeros. The US naval fighters are just better in all aspect other than turn rate.
@@Clement9892 When the F6F was made 1) the zero was already old 2) the americans knew how to fight the zero ( at high speed ) And i recomand you to compair the american fighters with the zero before saying that they were better at every aspect : The zero was 1000% more manouvrable The zero had at first the haviest possible armament The zero had at first the biggest range And the zero was faster than some F6Fs And saying that the american fighters had a k/d ratio of 11:1 is already SF They had , in deed high ratious not because they were better but because they were more than the zeroes in the air And that ratio is not for americans VS zero , its for americans vs japanese If you particulary make a ratio for every zero you will see that they outperformed the american fighters And the video its about planes at certain ranks , its not historical In the game the zero its the best at its Br and was the best until mid 1941 Please understand that its not about history but about Br
They should definitely make a map with just carriers and no island that only carrier aircraft can play because that would be fun rather than getting shot in the engine and dying from the engine overheating in a normal plane because you couldn’t land on the carrier
the F-4 phantom was originally was developed for the US navy and the marines, but was integrated into the Air Force later on, so calling the f-4 a naval fighter would be wrong considering the fact that the Air Force operated variants not built for the navy.
The BB1 and it's family in the USSR are really nice for their BR, but don't rely on your gunner Vadim. He's a self destructive magneto that will attract all the bullets to himself. Maybe they're just nice because at that BR you'll face a lot of torpedo boats without a lot of AA protection
I love how they were all Japanese or American (with the exeption of the Sea Hawk), even though most other countries have on par or better naval fighters.
Germany: no naval fighter (exept for the Seahawk which is actually British) USSR: not a single naval fighter China: no naval fighter execpt for the premium A6M2 Reisen which is actually Japanese Italy: not a single naval fighter Sweden: not a single naval fighter "most other countries have on par or better naval fighters" AKA only 2 of the 7 other countries (UK & France) even have naval fighters
Will you guys make an android or IOS variant of War Thunder in the near future? I have been playing World of Tanks on the phone, but it is based on HP and is not that realistic.
Funny to see a 1960s jet fighter landing on a Lexington-class aircraft carrier that was decomissioned in 1945. What about making larger CVs for modern jets?
Radi0active or just larger CVs in general, some planes wings hit the tower unless you dive off the left side of the carrier lol
but they can't sell that as prem.....oops
Jacky 95 or can they?..
@@KyrosAkolouthos in before premium only maps
I think they said they were working on it a while ago
Ah yes, the best naval fighters, perfect for fighting over berlin all the time
Joke's on you, there clearly is a river flowing through Berlin.
At least you're not being forced to use Japanese Army planes in the Pacific
Neon Leon yep.
Land it on a building and boom you have a makeshift aircraft carrier
@@Leon_der_Luftige you're a Russian tank crewman having a sandwich on the steps of the Riechstag
You look up and there is a Lexington class aircraft carrier on the river
And you think to yourself "Babushka put too much vodka on sandwich again"
It's hard getting a naval map tho
Yep, have been trying to get one for 3-4 weeks now. Got one two weeks ago, but the game bugged and didn't give me takeoff boost, and I crashed. +8min crewlock for maximum annoyance.
Much agreed
Not it Japan
And I miss that huge map where you gotta capture the airfield if you are in the allied team, what's it called again?
@@m-g-b513 I hate that map
Best naval fighters and you didnt mention A6M, good joke
Szperder 360
For real: even with its glaring flaws, the A6M2 mod 21 was perhaps one of the best fugh tees in the world in 1941
They did mention it. They should have talked about the A6M over the A7M though.
actually they list best of the best fighter for each rank by their speed, firepower, payload and versatility in both tank and air battle
Nor did they mention any of the Corsairs
@Takeshi Yoda lol that's a joke
First: it's hard to getting a naval map with a naval plane(usa vs japan)
Second:F4u-1d
It is very undertiered in my opinion although ıt is nose heavy.
Ok
I like the F4U series but 1C and 4B are my favorites but 4B repair cost like huge deep shiet if you died...
@@huycan9518 yeah unbelieveable.Ta-152,A6M5 otsu F4U4 costs fortune.Maybe more than M1A2 abrams!
@@smyrnamarauder1328 but those who have Ta have benefits that they spawn as an Tier IV 6.0+ "Interceptors" while others have to climb (lmao)
*F4U-4B wants to know your location.*
Lol just noticed you changed your name
@@jacobbender6998 You aren't up to date then ;).
oof
The A6M2 wanna know your location.
Didn’t you hear? Vehicles can’t be best if no one plays them. *Looking at you repair costs*
Ahhh yes cuz everyone knows how easy Tiny Tims are to use these days...
My tail felt that
the swordfish better be here smh
Jup, they ignored the entire Fleet Air Arm
Every Fleet Air Arm Fighter Ever: hey gaijin we exist
Gaijin: look at this amazing german naval aircraft!!! Its defiently german!!
Well maybe bc its not A FIGHTER
That's a bomber tho
I still have PTSD from my first game playing swordfish in RB a few years ago... my first map was the English Channel, took about 30 minutes to get across and as soon as I was over France I got shot down mercilessly
I love the Corsair and am shocked it is not on this list. Just look at it!!!
Well i think USA has enough on the list :D
was a shitty naval fighter tho. It was fine as a land based plane tho
Corsair is kinda garbage tbh gets uptiered
I can’t handle Corsair I have no idea how to do well in them
It is in the first second they didn’t mention that and the zero because everyone knows them
Of course the greatest of all The only one who sinked Bismarck.
Swordfish OH WAIT ITS BOMBER FK
Actualy is more of a naval atacker...
DONT TELL ME THAT IT DOESNT EXIST !
NOW IT DOES !
Bismarck sank itself after planes too old for fire control to lock broke its rudder and half the royal navy broke its guns, # ragequit
Can we get a 24/7 naval battle where its always going on with random events because naval battles are under represented
Yeah that would be awesome
We found the 2 naval players 😂
@@ariannavardi1834welp now it’s 64
Nah i Just stay with My Zero, there are enough people out there that think they can outturn it
enough out there that blow thru it at 450mph too lol
@@joshuamitcham1519 if only it werent dipped in napalm.
@@Lightning_aus its a fun plane,one of the best low teir kites but it gives players bad habits that fly it too much...and....a few well flown Corsairs can destroy an entire team of zekes
@@joshuamitcham1519 zeros that dont climb give me brain tumors
A7M2 is a fun upgrade tho: not AS nimble, but still really danged floaty, AND it has more speed, climb, firepower, and survival... and access to aerial mines that travel at a snail like 230m/s in exchange for the ability to explode and damage on a miss, and with as much HE as a Sidewinder
I want rice farmers with Rpg's next April fools
Good idea XD
Seafire FR47 Needs more recognition ; ;
Dosent even mention one of the.most famous carrier fighters the F4u corsiar. Smh.
Loki1701e exactly
Loki1701e They probably thought that they didn’t need to.
It is literally at the beginning of the video, what the hell
@@vittoriovaglio2031 thats the f2a not the f4u. Need dat mention.
Canale di Camel Cabal that’s not the f4u
My favorite Naval plane? When I had my F6F-5 it was nice but you rarely get naval maps now unless if its jets you get island maps a lot
Just give us modern carriers so we can actually take off and land with newer planes.
Ikr
I just wanna be able to takeoff using a F9F-2/5 I mean... they were designed in mind to takeoff without a catapult. Thats why they have injection WEP. but they can’t in war thunder.
Even our present WW2 Carriers are about 1/2-scale. Look at pictures of Hellcat fighters three abreast on the Lexington, or B-25's two abreast with wings over lapped only, to see how small our CV Models are. A major patch, up-sizing our CV's and adding the British, Japanese, and German(proposal) models would be a fantastic inclusion in a future update for Naval Warfare in War Thunder. Perhaps included with some update finally adding the Battleships every one is breathing heavy over?
@@WmGlen55 The thing though is that BBs would be too OP, but yeah they should add it. Maybe lower the number of players on the side with the BB.
You got your wish
@@aperson325 Yeah now if only I actually got maps with them when I flew my Naval fighters instead of fighting US+Japan over Britain alongside the Russians and Germans.
The Sea Hawk is British. At least give britain the credit, okay?
The German premium variant is straight up better than the British one as it's at the same BR with the same flight performance but it has sidewinders. Perfectly balanced as all things should be.
@@oliverhill9986 German Sea Hawk's BR went to 8.0 so it doesn't face rank V vehicles thankfully.
Why? It’s in the German tree. It being a British design isn’t relevant to the video?
@@TheDrummingWarrior Because the British Sea Hawk is the original one and also a naval fighter. The original producing country should at least be mentioned.
@@i-40282 They did a similar thing with the Centurion family video, where they started the video looking at the Swedish Centurion variants and what requirements the Swedes had, instead of looking at the interesting story as to how the British finally got the idea of a universal tank, or a main battle tank.
Gaijin: Finally we're at the very top or the last rank. The aircraft that is standing out the most here or in our opinion is the F-4EJ.
**FGR 2 wants to know your location.**
Of course, the best naval aircraft has got to be the Swordfish. Just look at it! Its even flying higher than the F4EJ Phantom in the vid.
Yess the mighty Swordfish!!
This sounds like Squire logic
That was a fury but I still agree!
@@flyingkiwi7560 Mmmmmhh. Aha! Yeeeeees.
Yeeeeesssss, Jolly Good old chap but our swordfish has been nerfed to ruddy buggery, THE BASTARDS!!
Actually that was a Fury (not Furry, Fury).
It is heartening to see the right amount of attention given the F6F Hellcat, and lack of attention given the Corsair. The Corsair was a superb land based fighter and attack aircraft, but was unable to operate from Carriers until the British developed a landing system for their Corsairs, and gave it to the US. The F6F Hellcats, flown by Navy and Marine Corp Pilots remained the only Naval Fighter in the Pacific onboard Carriers, until early 1945.
The Hellcat was designed after study of a captured Zero fighter. When introduced, it could outclimb, out-roll, out dive and outrun, the Japanese A6M5 variants that saw any action at all. If the Hellcat could drag a Zero into a high-speed turn (nearing 300mph) or climbing right turn, the Hellcat could out-turn the Zero purely on horsepower, boosted controls and seating position. Japan's later A7M variants would never see action owing to many factors. This is why the Hellcat got over 5000 kills during WW2; it was the most numerous naval fighter plane out there over the water. Marine Corp pilots used the Hellcat and Corsair with consummate skill in both air and attack roles, as is the duty of VMF units, but only USMC Hellcat's flew from Carriers till early '45.
So the Corsair had a prettier face or had the star-quality the war-time movie makers wanted. Later Movie and TV shows would make the F4U a legend. But, it's uglier and slightly larger older sister, the F6F Hellcat, carried the Navy family through most of the War. She would star only in "Hellcat's of the Navy", with John Wayne, in the story of the beginning of USMC Fighter Close Air Support doctrine.
JustWill, writer, amateur aviation historian, and non-rated aviation enthusiast. Oh, and three-time winner of the permanent Chat-ban as well.
My favourite naval fighter is the wonderful PO-2
My favorite is the yak 9
Mine's the PE 8
Fools
Absolute fools
We all know KV 2 is best
@@hklassehutten1476
YOU UTTER FOOL! GERMAN SCIENCE IS THE WORLD'S FINEST!
OF COURSE IT'S THE STURMPANZER II.
That’s not a naval fighter that’s a satellite
The Japanese F-4EJ Phantom is not and will never be a carrier based fighter, for its entire operating life it was land based and never used from a carrier. Just because it keeps the tail hook (which many USAF designs have for emergency landings) does not make it a carrier fighter.
That's super obvious when you consider the country that had that variant has no Carriers of their own to use them from, I'm sure if they did have CVs they would've used it for naval operations....
Bro, B-29 can operate from carriers in YOLO Thunder. You really going to gripe that a plane fitted for cats and traps can?
When i play with my Bomber there is the chance higher that i join a fighter naval battle
I personally would have picked the F6F-5N over the basic F6F-5, as the additional 20mm cannons and radar give it a clear advantage over its predecessor, plus it has the same A2G loadout so you're not losing anything there.
Loses speed and manuverability
1:06 "... litteraly has no big flaws. Not a single one"
Well, if there any, it was H E A V Y
4:33 my favorite were the A6M series
Im ass at the game so that heavyness was God sent. I was able to take head ons and eat roundd long enough for help to arrive and make it bacj to base to repair. In my eyes its one of ny favorite planes ive played so farr guvin im only at teir 3 with the americans and am fsirly nee to the game
The F6F 5N is by far one of my favorite planes to fly. It has two 20mm cannons, four 12.7 machine guns, and a pretty good stock turn rate.
question for the shooting range: Why Gaijin doesn't put a more modern soviet tank? Like the T-90? Because the USA has 5 Abrams
Better question is why they don’t do that and then give the M1A2 the m829a1 shell. That’d level the playing field
this aged well
When you talk about the Buffalo, an infamous failure in the Navy, instead of the Wildcat which had an excellent combat record. At least the other Grummans got in.
Sadly the wildcat is in the second rank of the tech tree...
THER WERE NO AVENGERS
WE NEED TBF-1C
I'm surprised the Wild Cat didn't get a spot, it's a surprisingly good plane for its tier. Very maneuverable and effective.
Corsair is better
@@aborretossenbs7307 The Corsair isn't in it's tier
@@sethjansson5652 in arcade yes but in realistic you can energyfight and boom and zoom so there the corsair is much better
@@aborretossenbs7307 You can boom and zoom in Arcade too lol. You just decide not to because "wooow, plane go weeee!"
F4U-4B has a very special place in my heart. An absolute monster of an aircraft
Please add multiplayer-controlled turrets. I want to fly my Po-2 with my friend at the back turret!
That would be sick!
Yess
Id settle for an autopilot that doesnt run into trees
Me: how many bombs do you carry
F-4EJ: yes!
Suggestion: 'Rank does not matter.'
What piece of Ground Force tech from each nation it most capable of fighting above its current BR, and why you may considering holding onto them as you progress further through the tree?
F4U-4B.exe has not been found
i like how gajijn's like "BEST NAVAL FIGHTERS" proceeds to talk about how shitty the sea hawk mk.100 "Ooh, it does have missiles though"
The British non premium variant is at the same BR with the same performance, but has no air to air missiles. Perfectly balanced as all things should be.
Unpopular opinion: Fairey Firefly V. Got 4 kills in RB three months ago
Ps: Add Fairey Fulmar maybe?
Yeah... i have had extremely good games in both fireflys... killed many krauts, im disapointed it didnt show up in this video
@@flyingkiwi7560 yeah ı wonder what could Fairey birds could achieve ıf they were not spoiled by admiralty.Wish they will add Seafire I-IV,Sea Hurricane II series
FUlmar was way better
@@svb1192 Fulmar would just be 109 food im guessing... Gaijin and their eternal knloage will put it with 109 E and it will get beaned
After you post this video i was downloading war thunder at my ps4
Good video but what about the A6M zero or the supermarine seafire or the F4U corsair?
Yeah... They are way better by far
@@juanpablocastro5300 waaaaaaaaay better
A6M5, and 2 of its other variant Ko and Otsu
So manny people out there that think they could outturn it :3
@@ghostarmy1106 i am fighting a lot against A6Ms and its always funny to see that they are in front of you and in the next second behind you
have to add in the Warthunder aircraft carrier compatible with 60's jets
F6F5 and corsair are my favorite naval fighters. B17 and b29 are my favorite bombers. P51 is my favorite land fighter.
I love how 90% of the time I play naval aircraft I'm put into a landlocked map.
I'd love some modern AC carriers for the jets like my F-4C and proper bases for waterbourne AC to land, repair, and rearm. Having to belly land my boats on land kinda takes a bit of the realism out of realistic battles, y'know? Thank you.
My fav Naval fighters is F6F-5N, that because Hellcats is my fav fighters in ww2, i use Hellcats so much in Tanks until i get P-47M and Ad-4 and still use her in Naval.
The Capability of carrying wide variation of rockets, bombs, even Torpedo makes it an excellent fighter to use in mixed battle and it have radar, and boy i really like to use it in Simukator and surprised attack even Me-262 with it, it also quite durable, one time i was chasing Ju-288 in simulator, after i shot it down i just realized that i lost half of my wing, so bassicaly i chase that Ju-288 with half wing.
Hey Gaijin, Will you update the aircraft carriers that we land on? (doesn't make sense that jets are landing on lexington class aircraft carriers)
Am I the only one who would want to see the French Char FCM 2C in game?
It would be better to add the O-I
I am of the opinion that the A7M1 and A7M2 are absolutely the best fighters in the game period. Their guns put a serious hurting on the enemy, they handle extremely well, they're plenty fast, they are fantastic energy fighters, fantastic turn fighters and their climb rate is exceptional.
The seahawk is landing from the front LMAO
You forgot the F4U Corsair, an amazing fighter due to being able to reach top speeds even at lower altitudes
No mention of arguably the best US prop which happens to be a naval fighter as well? (F4U-4B)
F3D is my favourite. Have absolutely fallen in love with that plane...
You have to add new aircraft carriers in the game compatible with the new naval jets
We going to forget the sea fire and tempest?
Its weird Sea fury didnt mentioned
The Etendard the “highly agile” french jet that you shafted as all french stuff but the game is the most ReaLiSTiC wowowowoowow
発音が綺麗で聞き取りやすいリスニング動画
Favorite naval plane?
Probably the F9F Panther. I've always been a fan of Grumman designs, and the F9F certainly didn't disappoint me.
Not like the channel would actually acknowledge anyone's opinion or anything...
I Respect you so much guys for make in this game and make videos to help player to be come better. You are the best guys
But the f4 ej is not a naval fighter... It's tail hook is for emergency landing only.
My question is this when will carriers such as midway and kitty hawk class be introduced
one aircarft not yet in WT and changed naval strategy is the harrier jump jet used in the falklands by the royal navy in 1982 against french made mirages and american made sky hawks
Tach's F2A buffalo can be referred to as the new guys introduction to premium, it was literally the first premium I bought all the way back in 2013
D4Y2, thing never disappoints in naval mixed battles.
Hey gaijin, ive kind of burnt out of WT, any ideas that could help me get back into the game?!
RAAFLightningII think of top tier
@@goose407 yes but my top teirs get stomped bc of the new supersonics. I grinded all the way to the hunter f6 and its useless now.
@@Ironpine27 i tried space thunder, got bored quickly then continued on my gran turis.o sport grind
@@f0lg0r39 im fed up of paying 20k+ for my hunter which shouldnt even face top teirs
Premium comrade
I agree with one of the guys below, it would be great to have airplane arcade battles at sea, not just air support in naval battles.
Interesting how they listed the F-4E as a "naval fighter" when that version of the Phantom never saw a carrier deck in its life. Just because a fighter has a tailhook doesn't mean it's automatically a naval fighter; look at the F-15 and F-16; they both have them, yet are dedicated land-based fighters.
Considering Japan had no carriers to put their naval capable fighter on it's obvious they've never seen one in real life operations, but the fact a plane is totally capable of naval operations gives that as part of it's designation. It's like saying the B7A2 isn't a naval bomber because the only carrier that could launch it was destroyed before they could operate.
@@Ko_Kasumi The difference between the B7A2 and the F-4E is that the B7A2 was designed to operate from carriers, the F-4E isn't; it may be able to land on a carrier, but it won't be able to be launched off it since it lacks equipment to use the catapults.
@@Orca19904 Depending on the power to weight of the plane it could be possible to launch without a catapult, actually there are modern carriers that don't have a catapult system and instead just use a slight ramp
Me, a Japanese player, sees video title: " oh finally our time to shine!"
Video: Showcases...two Japanese naval fighter and the rest are practically Americans
Me: "Fffffuuuuu-"
To be fair there weren't many natal fighters for Japan (A5M, A6M, and the never deployed A7M) while there is a bunch of em (F2F, F3F, F4F, F4U, F6F, after war jets) for the Americans
@@周生生-f1f ITS NOT ABOUT NUMBERS , ITS ABOUT QUALITY !
THATS WHT THERE SHOULD'VE BEEN THE ZERO !
@@StevieTheBush " ITS NOT ABOUT NUMBERS , ITS ABOUT QUALITY !" Ah yes, go say that to the F6F with a ratio of 11:1 during WWII. After 41 the Zero was just a joke for the US, it's not surprising to only see the A7M and not the other Zeros. The US naval fighters are just better in all aspect other than turn rate.
@@Clement9892 When the F6F was made
1) the zero was already old
2) the americans knew how to fight the zero ( at high speed )
And i recomand you to compair the american fighters with the zero before saying that they were better at every aspect :
The zero was 1000% more manouvrable
The zero had at first the haviest possible armament
The zero had at first the biggest range
And the zero was faster than some F6Fs
And saying that the american fighters had a k/d ratio of 11:1 is already SF
They had , in deed high ratious not because they were better but because they were more than the zeroes in the air
And that ratio is not for americans VS zero , its for americans vs japanese
If you particulary make a ratio for every zero you will see that they outperformed the american fighters
And the video its about planes at certain ranks , its not historical
In the game the zero its the best at its Br and was the best until mid 1941
Please understand that its not about history but about Br
日本人?
Really like the f 3d1 because it has radar and its a great turn fighter, and it can hold the 2 tiny Tim’s as well as other bombs
i think the corsair shouldve made it. it has good guns and turns well
I had a lot of fun with the French variant of the sbd dauntless. When can I expect a climbing the ranks for French aircraft?
@gaijin why are the repairecost for the italien tanks and planes so high and can we expect a repairecost change??
There are lots of problems in the Italian TT . Gaijin doesn't care about It.
@@100undici5 sad because the italiens have nice machines💪 and they give balance against the americans and russians
They should definitely make a map with just carriers and no island that only carrier aircraft can play because that would be fun rather than getting shot in the engine and dying from the engine overheating in a normal plane because you couldn’t land on the carrier
What missile overload can we expect on the top tier missiles in a few months?
No mention of the Etendard IVM??
Will you update the aircraft carrier to the new generation?
I like the corsairs
Big Boi who doesn’t
Good question
Probably the people that have to go against them
My favorite is F-4EJ
What MiG-21 variants are planned?
Super good videos. Keep on going
I always say it because I know it's true: If you aren't flying a Grumman Cat, you aren't winning the fight.
Hey Gaijin! Can you please consider adding rudimentary cruise missiles to the game? For example the He-111 could carry the V-1 flying bomb.
Hs293 guided missile. 500kg warhead with a rocket motor and the same guidance system as the Fritz X
I love naval fighters
Well but what use can you give to the naval properties of these aircrafts if in Air RB you rarely get battles which involved aircraft carriers.
I have some naval fighters but everytime i go to battle, there is no Aircraft carrier. Where can i even find the Aircraft carriers?
Ah, the good old F2A-3 the plane that couldn’t turn, couldn’t Climb, and it could only dive. Did you see what happened at midway.
the F-4 phantom was originally was developed for the US navy and the marines, but was integrated into the Air Force later on, so calling the f-4 a naval fighter would be wrong considering the fact that the Air Force operated variants not built for the navy.
The BB1 and it's family in the USSR are really nice for their BR, but don't rely on your gunner Vadim. He's a self destructive magneto that will attract all the bullets to himself. Maybe they're just nice because at that BR you'll face a lot of torpedo boats without a lot of AA protection
0:35 "when it comes to speed and.. agimity"
I love how they were all Japanese or American (with the exeption of the Sea Hawk), even though most other countries have on par or better naval fighters.
lol over half were usa, while the rest were singles from a handful of nations.
Germany: no naval fighter (exept for the Seahawk which is actually British)
USSR: not a single naval fighter
China: no naval fighter execpt for the premium A6M2 Reisen which is actually Japanese
Italy: not a single naval fighter
Sweden: not a single naval fighter
"most other countries have on par or better naval fighters" AKA only 2 of the 7 other countries (UK & France) even have naval fighters
Will you guys make an android or IOS variant of War Thunder in the near future? I have been playing World of Tanks on the phone, but it is based on HP and is not that realistic.
Didn't I forget to mention that THE DIFFERENT A20 HAS A RECORD
I *need* FW-190 with a torpedo (preferably U14).
Please...
All Focke Wulfs should get the bombs they could carry irl
@Preposterous Altercation No, only the A-5 U-2 and the F-8 get bombs. In real life all of the FW-190s got bombs apart from the A-1 I think
War thunder just turns into the most fun, realistic vehicle combat simulator that ever exist, I play this game for so many years and still love it
Blackburn Firebrand!
Squire wouldn't be proud
You didn't even mention the A6M Zero the the F4F Wildcat
They did that because apparently versatility for A2G operations is something you definitely need for a *fighter*
2 of my favorite naval fighters are the Corsair and zero
F4f3 is my favorite fighter in the game. I use it for air and ground realistic.
The Firebrand is my favourite, hands down.
I think one of my favorites is definitely the f-4c Phantom
Will you had naval fighter only maps for simulator battle ? It woulf be really cool to see some of the greatest pacific air battle in game
Honestly, people sleep on the F4F-3, thing might not be the best at anything, but it can turn surprisingly well, and 4 .50s do a lot of work
Excellant dive speed too