Well done. I have a Dunning-Kruger level of AI understanding, but I’ve found the base arguments from Elizier and Conner, etc, make logically sound conclusions at the tail end of a digital evolution. My takeaway from your presentation is, essentially, we’re just not close enough to worry about it (Lecann’s view). Two questions, if I may… I don’t often get the chance to speak with knowledge people from a knowledgeable place. 1. With the amount of money and attention, how likely is the development of a new step-change/idea/procedure to render current methods obsolete, or utilize them for scaffolding? 2. When presented with tail-end arguments towards how to control super intelligence, do you have a proposal or strategy? Thanks for your time. 😊
@@LanceWinder great questions! 1. It seems very likely, especially if huge sums of investor money are withdrawn by next year, as expected. Can they shoehorn current technologies into new ones? At the very least, they should be able to utilize new power infrastructures. I don’t think building from scratch is a thing in Big Tech, so my bet would be on emerging tech that organizations like WEF are so interested in. 2. As it stands, no such technology exists, so anything I could say would be highly speculative and theoretical. True super intelligence would have autonomy, and if it gets to the point where it’s not reliant on power, the internet, or computers, there is simply no “unplugging” it.
![070 - 7 Reasons You Shouldn’t “do” Social Media [Spark Infinity]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Zg37VgkjvSI/mqdefault.jpg)
![070 – 7 Reasons You Shouldn’t “do” Social Media [Spark Infinity]](/img/tr.png)
Well done.
I have a Dunning-Kruger level of AI understanding, but I’ve found the base arguments from Elizier and Conner, etc, make logically sound conclusions at the tail end of a digital evolution. My takeaway from your presentation is, essentially, we’re just not close enough to worry about it (Lecann’s view). Two questions, if I may… I don’t often get the chance to speak with knowledge people from a knowledgeable place.
1. With the amount of money and attention, how likely is the development of a new step-change/idea/procedure to render current methods obsolete, or utilize them for scaffolding?
2. When presented with tail-end arguments towards how to control super intelligence, do you have a proposal or strategy?
Thanks for your time. 😊
@@LanceWinder great questions!
1. It seems very likely, especially if huge sums of investor money are withdrawn by next year, as expected. Can they shoehorn current technologies into new ones? At the very least, they should be able to utilize new power infrastructures. I don’t think building from scratch is a thing in Big Tech, so my bet would be on emerging tech that organizations like WEF are so interested in.
2. As it stands, no such technology exists, so anything I could say would be highly speculative and theoretical. True super intelligence would have autonomy, and if it gets to the point where it’s not reliant on power, the internet, or computers, there is simply no “unplugging” it.
@ Thanks so much!
@@LanceWinder You're very welcome.