dlls is broken. You need to use ultra performance to get what quality should give. Using just resolution scale at 50% without any upscaling gives more fps then dlls ultra performance
That makes sense, right? The upscaling is being computed on the GPU, so there should be some overhead compared to a truly native 50% render resolution. So 1080p rendered internally by DLSS will be slightly lower framerate than 1080p rendered natively, right? Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
@cajonesalt0191 you are correct. We haven't tested this for COD yet but example from our Silent Hill 2 coverage 4K DLSS Performance (1080p internal) gets 70FPS while native 1080p gets 79FPS. Typically there will be a small performance hit to upscale, some cards/games more than others.
i have 330 fps.. average and rtx max path tracing max dlls quality with frame gen at 1440p and all max settings plus i put custom to the max... why is dlls broken ?. yes i have 4090.
I know it is found in the written review, but perhaps the video reviews could also include the preset comparisons? Since they also include framerate comparisons for each preset, giving more information while still being decently condensed, as I doubt people in youtube are the kind that would leave to another website. Anyhow, good video.
@@TechPowerUp I imagine stills would be preferable even, as it gives people a chance to pixel peep if they wanted to do so and they would also get information for how performance scales across presets. So yes, they should be enough.
Those are in the written review! Definitely see the value and do add them to our GPU/CPU videos, but didn't want to make the videos longer when the story doesn't change by adding them normally.
I9 12900k, Rx 7900xt red devil gpu average is 178. Bench mark is 155 . My gpu is cpu bound and the better the cpu the better my gpu will work . 165 hrz monitor 1440p
Our test rig for 2024 is a 14900K. Full specs in the written review. www.techpowerup.com/review/call-of-duty-black-ops-6-fps-performance-benchmark/3.html
Love my 7900xt. This game is a little more demanding than mw3 was I found. Can’t wait for 8th generation consoles to be phased out; black ops 6 isn’t an impressive COD
Generally these games sell more so on current consoles, which happens to be RDNA based gpu arch, which 6000 and 7000 series are related to as well. Now, being made for consoles doesn't always translate to amd optimization on the pc side, but in CODs engine it works out like that.
@Chronobodi that makes no sense. Console games that come to PC like The Last of us or God of War don't favor AMD gpu's, those games cleary sell best on RDNA based consoles.
doing something way wrong there... I'm running this on everything maxed out at 3440x1440 and getting 290-340 FPS on a 7900xtx paired with a 5950x it does burn through 18gb of vram doing so though, my guess is you've handicapped perf by limiting to 40% vram or something silly
@@brichardson342 no I use the in game or RivaTuner with HWInfo.... but its worse.... they dropped an update that enabled fluid motion frames in single player and hides it in the MP settings, so you dont even know its on.. you need to load up single player to turn it off, they go back into MP.... Who interviews these devs How ever I retested, I hover around 140-220ish depending on the maps, and a butter smooth 3 or 4ms frame time, depending on the map
Awfully optimized game, makes no sense my 2070 gets over 140 fps on 1440 High settings on BF1 and MW2019 which are both graphically better than BO6, but i cant even get 60 on BO6
![PS5 Pro Reviews, Boost Mode, Sony's Secret Upgrades | PlayStation Lost A Big IP. - [LTPS #647]](/img/n.gif)
quick and to the point thank you for not making a 30 minute video on this!
It would be nice to see same comparison at low settings, appreciate the quick to the point video
thanks for your work
Thank you for watching and subscribing!
The past few COD games have repeatedly over-performed on AMD cards compared to Nvidia… I guess this engine really likes infinity cache 🤔
Right? I'm always surprised by the 1440p performance on the 6800
Because Cod engine favors high computing and radeon gpu are much capable of doing that then nvidia.
Or memory bandwidth
how is the 3080 and 3090 so far below other cards that should be similarly ranked, like the 6900xt and the 7800xt.
CoD games loves AMD cards and runs much better on them.
The IW Engine loves Infinity Cache. CODs always preform better on AMD cards than the specs would suggest
Because AMD nerfs Nvidia gpus in cod, been this way for years.
@@Rimmer666 As do most games that do not cater to the Nvidia gimmicks that people love to over pay for.
dlls is broken. You need to use ultra performance to get what quality should give. Using just resolution scale at 50% without any upscaling gives more fps then dlls ultra performance
That makes sense, right? The upscaling is being computed on the GPU, so there should be some overhead compared to a truly native 50% render resolution. So 1080p rendered internally by DLSS will be slightly lower framerate than 1080p rendered natively, right? Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
@cajonesalt0191 you are correct. We haven't tested this for COD yet but example from our Silent Hill 2 coverage 4K DLSS Performance (1080p internal) gets 70FPS while native 1080p gets 79FPS. Typically there will be a small performance hit to upscale, some cards/games more than others.
@@cajonesalt0191 ultra performance is like 33% if I remeber and it gives less fps then 50% resolution scale without upscaling
i have 330 fps.. average and rtx max path tracing max dlls quality with frame gen at 1440p and all max settings plus i put custom to the max... why is dlls broken ?. yes i have 4090.
@@MakeSh00t Native to dlls quality gives me like 10% more fps and it should be like 40% +
rtx 2080 ti slower than a rtx 4060. Something doesnt make any sense here.
This is stock 2080 Ti 250w,i have 420w 2080 ti KUDAN 2160Mhz core, 1.1v 17ghz memory Samsung, the performance is 4060 ti in this game1440p 60+fps
@kokiangelov1271 nice my evga 2080 ti xc only does 2115-2130 core.
I know it is found in the written review, but perhaps the video reviews could also include the preset comparisons? Since they also include framerate comparisons for each preset, giving more information while still being decently condensed, as I doubt people in youtube are the kind that would leave to another website. Anyhow, good video.
Would it be enough to show the stills from the written or you think the video would be needed?
@@TechPowerUp I imagine stills would be preferable even, as it gives people a chance to pixel peep if they wanted to do so and they would also get information for how performance scales across presets. So yes, they should be enough.
Included in the Dragon Age video!
This game runs like 35-40% worse than MW3 on my hardware . 11700k 32GB 3080ti am getting 170-210 fps on 1440p Ultra on MW3.
Just blame yo Intel shit
@PillarsofT2 its def long in the tooth but I'm waiting on the 9800x3d and 5080 to build the next one...
Im using the 7800X3D and the 6950XT and getting like ~170 FPS using the games recommended settings based off your hardware. Which is not bad
you should've included 1% lows.
great work btw
Those are in the written review! Definitely see the value and do add them to our GPU/CPU videos, but didn't want to make the videos longer when the story doesn't change by adding them normally.
I9 12900k, Rx 7900xt red devil gpu average is 178. Bench mark is 155 . My gpu is cpu bound and the better the cpu the better my gpu will work . 165 hrz monitor 1440p
I might have missed this , but cpu was combined with these tests?
Our test rig for 2024 is a 14900K. Full specs in the written review. www.techpowerup.com/review/call-of-duty-black-ops-6-fps-performance-benchmark/3.html
Overclocked my 6700xt RD, shits giving 10-15fps more on average in 1440p with (DLSS Enabaler), its silky smooth
Nice introduce input lag with the upscaler really smart
What CPU was Paired with the gpus??
Our 2024 test rig uses a 14900K.
Ryzen would separate performance even more?
who plays competitive games in extreme settings...
Love my 7900xt. This game is a little more demanding than mw3 was I found.
Can’t wait for 8th generation consoles to be phased out; black ops 6 isn’t an impressive COD
I'm 1440p normal settings and get 100 fps, lows would be 80 but I have seen 130
Why TF is AMD so strong?
Its more like Nvidia being nerfed than AMD being strong.
@ why is that mlord
been like this for a few years now, cod games love amd gpus
Generally these games sell more so on current consoles, which happens to be RDNA based gpu arch, which 6000 and 7000 series are related to as well. Now, being made for consoles doesn't always translate to amd optimization on the pc side, but in CODs engine it works out like that.
@Chronobodi that makes no sense. Console games that come to PC like The Last of us or God of War don't favor AMD gpu's, those games cleary sell best on RDNA based consoles.
Nice.
Yes of course the game prefer amd!!!but having both brands cod also prefer direct x errors with amd.....
I am runing this game with 10700k and 4060 oc. 130fps stable. 4060 have so much hate but is damn good card. At 1080p. 120w of power is amazing!
amazing my rtx3080.
doing something way wrong there... I'm running this on everything maxed out at 3440x1440 and getting 290-340 FPS on a 7900xtx paired with a 5950x it does burn through 18gb of vram doing so though, my guess is you've handicapped perf by limiting to 40% vram or something silly
They probably only test the most demanding areas of the game as is normal for gpu testing
U must be using amd fps counter with fluid motion on. It tampers with the try counter
@@brichardson342 no I use the in game or RivaTuner with HWInfo.... but its worse.... they dropped an update that enabled fluid motion frames in single player and hides it in the MP settings, so you dont even know its on.. you need to load up single player to turn it off, they go back into MP....
Who interviews these devs
How ever I retested, I hover around 140-220ish depending on the maps, and a butter smooth 3 or 4ms frame time, depending on the map
Awfully optimized game, makes no sense my 2070 gets over 140 fps on 1440 High settings on BF1 and MW2019 which are both graphically better than BO6, but i cant even get 60 on BO6
Rx 6900 xt KİNG
Yep my 7900xt is always ready but my pocket and mind aren't ready to spend $100 on a shit copy pasted cod game.
👏👍
anyone who has the highest end 4090 will not care about the furnace that the 7900xtx is
😭😭
Who cares crap game for sure nothing but junk
Best cod ever
I’m genuinely confused as to why you’re here then