Empirical Formula & Molecular Formula & Water of Crystallisation - A level Chemistry

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 56

  • @ajtv6208
    @ajtv6208 11 місяців тому +5

    Doing AQA A level chemistry- your explanation and examples is the best

    • @chemistrytutor
      @chemistrytutor  11 місяців тому

      Thank you so much for the feedback 😀

  • @RueMkt-xz9td
    @RueMkt-xz9td Рік тому +5

    Love u mr Tutor. Thus is very useful. Im doing Natural sciences for premed and yo videos are just on point 🎉

  • @Romancezie
    @Romancezie 9 місяців тому +3

    Thank you so much. Have exams today and this was really helpful

  • @mikeadamson1334
    @mikeadamson1334 2 місяці тому +1

    thank you so much, was struggling but not anymore :)

    • @chemistrytutor
      @chemistrytutor  2 місяці тому

      I’m glad you found it valuable. Thanks for letting me know! Smile 😃

  • @finnerz9200
    @finnerz9200 Рік тому +4

    Brilliant video, thanks.

  • @Alvlchbio
    @Alvlchbio Місяць тому +1

    14:39

  • @H.Y78944
    @H.Y78944 3 місяці тому +1

    u have amazing teaching ability

  • @kaitlincolman9866
    @kaitlincolman9866 2 роки тому +4

    Really helpful video! Is water of crystallisation on the new spec?

    • @chemistrytutor
      @chemistrytutor  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks for the feedback. It is yes, as part of empirical formula. I've done a question walkthrough if you want to watch more ?

  • @TediBSS
    @TediBSS 8 місяців тому +1

    do we need to know about how the first experiment works for the aqa spec? like about lifting the lid and magnesium not burning properly stuff
    Also, how do we know if the mole ratio is close enough to a whole number to round up/down to it?

    • @chemistrytutor
      @chemistrytutor  8 місяців тому +2

      Specifically know... I'd say not. Be ready to make deductions for questions beginning with "Suggest why..." then yes, this is the sort if thing they could ask.
      For mole ratio, realistically, I think anything past 1:1.2 should be scaled up. In all likelihood it would be that it goes to a 1:1.25 or 1:1.33 or 1:1.5 which are common decimalised fractions

  • @JosephAdamu-fi7mq
    @JosephAdamu-fi7mq 3 місяці тому +3

    spot on

  • @relify2428
    @relify2428 Місяць тому

    Dont normally comment but this video was superb

    • @chemistrytutor
      @chemistrytutor  Місяць тому

      That feedback is gold-thank you so much! 😃

  • @hamzah4656
    @hamzah4656 2 роки тому +4

    thanks for this, it really helps

  • @ElizabethJennifer-x6h
    @ElizabethJennifer-x6h Місяць тому +1

    For the phosphorus oxide question, Is the P2O5 the empirical formula or molecular formula, since it's doubled, please I need clarification on that 😢

    • @chemistrytutor
      @chemistrytutor  Місяць тому

      @ElizabethJennifer-x6h this is the empirical formula. We needed to double it as it wasn't a whole number ratio. The empirical formula must be a whole number ratio

    • @ElizabethJennifer-x6h
      @ElizabethJennifer-x6h Місяць тому

      @chemistrytutor Thanks 😊

  • @meerabfatima2709
    @meerabfatima2709 2 роки тому +4

    Why did you stop making videos they are really useful I am home student I need your videos please can you make more which explains the topics please they are sooooo useful

    • @chemistrytutor
      @chemistrytutor  2 роки тому +1

      Don't worry, I haven't stopped!
      For instance, I released this recently ua-cam.com/video/yech6seOtwk/v-deo.html
      😃

    • @meerabfatima2709
      @meerabfatima2709 2 роки тому

      @@chemistrytutor Thanks a lot I do OCR A I find them so useful so many of my friends watch your videos thanks 🙏 please can you make some videos for ocr A I and my friends really like your videos

    • @chemistrytutor
      @chemistrytutor  2 роки тому +1

      @@meerabfatima2709 thank you for your kind feedback. That's what keeps me going!

    • @chemistrytutor
      @chemistrytutor  2 роки тому +1

      @@meerabfatima2709 don't worry, I will keep making them. Also, the vast majority of my videos are suitable for all a level exam boards 😃

  • @ajtv6208
    @ajtv6208 11 місяців тому +2

    Your videos are BANGINGGGF

  • @samsyy-601
    @samsyy-601 Рік тому +1

    3:24 why cant we reduce down the last molecular formulae by 2??

    • @chemistrytutor
      @chemistrytutor  Рік тому +1

      The empirical formula is the simplest whole number ratio, so 6:12:6 reduces down to 1:2:1

    • @samsyy-601
      @samsyy-601 Рік тому +1

      @@chemistrytutor thank youu! this was the first video i watched of yours and i am so glad you go into so much details and even reply the comments. I wish you could teach physics too😪😵‍💫 I have ADHD and its hard for me to learn things without knowing whole of their basics

    • @chemistrytutor
      @chemistrytutor  Рік тому +3

      @@samsyy-601 you're very kind! It's lovely to know the videos are useful!

  • @chairman4997
    @chairman4997 5 днів тому +1

    Is this still good for those taking CAIE A level ??

    • @chemistrytutor
      @chemistrytutor  5 днів тому

      @@chairman4997
      Hi! Yes, this video will be suitable for any exam board.
      While I primarily teach AQA, I ensure that the content I cover aligns with the core principles of chemistry that are shared across most exam boards. The key differences between boards are usually in how they structure the course, the specific topics included in each exam, and the format or style of the questions. However, 95% of the content remains consistent, so you'll still find the information helpful regardless of the exam board you're following.

  • @gamuchirainmago3328
    @gamuchirainmago3328 4 місяці тому

    thank you for this , its very understandable

  • @fatimasardar2682
    @fatimasardar2682 Рік тому +2

    Thank you 😊

  • @muhammadafzal7333
    @muhammadafzal7333 8 місяців тому

    does the physical cchemistry year 1 playlist cover complete as physival exam in 12 hours please do reply

  • @Fatima-vv4gc
    @Fatima-vv4gc Рік тому +2

    thank you

  • @Alvlchbio
    @Alvlchbio Місяць тому +1

    @4:33