Unveiling The Remarkable Discovery Of Pi By A Genius - Prepare To Be Amazed!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 620

  • @yaish3463
    @yaish3463 3 роки тому +158

    This is is the best explanation of pi I've seen so far, that too the explanation was by one of the best artists. And the drawings were simple yet elegant, I'm impressed and you have caught my attention

    • @tiffanyscott3544
      @tiffanyscott3544 3 роки тому +4

      Ditto!

    • @СофияИванова-х6й
      @СофияИванова-х6й Рік тому

      Hello ! Please tell me if the circle was smaller and stopped to say 2 and something ? What happen ?

    • @A._Meroy
      @A._Meroy 8 місяців тому

      @@СофияИванова-х6й If the circle was smaller then both its diameter and circumference were smaller, and they would be smaller by the same factor. So for a circle of any size its circumference will always be 3.14 times its diameter.

    • @leosmith848
      @leosmith848 7 місяців тому

      You have to be seriously innumerate for this to be amazing.

    • @buzzwaldron6195
      @buzzwaldron6195 7 місяців тому +1

      Pi x D = C was simple enough...

  • @kevinkasp
    @kevinkasp 11 місяців тому +16

    I figured this out in 4th grade by experimenting with various coins as my “wheel”. We hadn’t learned fractions yet so all I could say was “the distance around a circle is a little bit more than three times the diameter.”
    Well actually I didn’t know the word diameter yet so it was “A little bit more than three times across the circle.”

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  11 місяців тому +1

      Eureka! 😆

    • @jgarrison1309
      @jgarrison1309 11 місяців тому

      ua-cam.com/video/hfIhPaNKxN8/v-deo.html

    • @bozhidarmihaylov
      @bozhidarmihaylov 7 місяців тому

      Same time here 😂 maybe 3rd, same way as in the video half, half, half!? 15 is Pretty (and known), so 3,15 😂 Pretty disappointed that 2x15=30 and 3x30=90 damn!😂 3,25 !? Ugly .. third x quarter..dang 😂

    • @cheriem432
      @cheriem432 2 місяці тому

      Yeah? Well, I "discovered" the Mobius strip at 10 years old. So there! 😊

    • @cheriem432
      @cheriem432 2 місяці тому

      Really? Fourth grade and you hadn't had fractions? Wow! As for your comment, good for you!

  • @richblaker9087
    @richblaker9087 Рік тому +11

    That really is truly astonishing... I had no idea Pritt Stick was even around in Archimedes time...

  • @jagdishb2201
    @jagdishb2201 2 місяці тому +1

    I am 63 years old from Bangalore,India. And I am an Engineer. Till now I thought pi was just a ratio. This is the first time , I saw this kind of explanation.
    If my primary school teacher had taught me something like this , I am sure I would have been a better student and an Engineer.
    Thanks and God bless you 🙏🙏🙏

  • @PlaywithJunk
    @PlaywithJunk 7 місяців тому +4

    We did this in school. We were told to make cardboard discs and to use a piece of string to measure the circumference. Then measure the diameter and divide the first number by the second. No matter what the size of the disc was, the result was always close to 3.1.

  • @joshuabardon9992
    @joshuabardon9992 4 роки тому +53

    This is put together very well! You always sound so happy while talking about all this which makes it feel very welcoming

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  4 роки тому +3

      Glad you think so! 😃

    • @AlCatrraz
      @AlCatrraz 8 місяців тому +1

      For a GENIUS, deriving the the value of PI was A PIECE OF CAKE…

  • @KENG-mf8pl
    @KENG-mf8pl 4 роки тому +38

    This is the most logical explanation of pi

  • @ibrahimsoukak437
    @ibrahimsoukak437 3 місяці тому +1

    Super fun to watch. Everybody should be explaining math this way

  • @educatedtraveler1270
    @educatedtraveler1270 6 місяців тому

    I can't believe I have not seen this until now. I will definitely do this with my 4th and 5th grade students. Thank you so much.

  • @TheTimeProphet
    @TheTimeProphet 7 місяців тому +4

    I have never seen Pi explained like this, like ever. Even though I knew what PI was, this was a really clever explanation.

    • @thepcfd
      @thepcfd 2 місяці тому

      veritasium have some videos about old geometry men, these guys was insane.

  • @johncraig2623
    @johncraig2623 7 місяців тому +22

    Great explanation and demonstration! I could wish you had pointed out that pi is *approximately* 3.14. It isn't 3.14.

    • @DennisMathias
      @DennisMathias 5 місяців тому

      Not really. It is C/D. It is not any numeral. If someone insists it is, ask them what that number is. Either fraction or decimal.

    • @markphillips3341
      @markphillips3341 2 місяці тому

      I was taught that pi was a fraction being 22/7.

    • @johncraig2623
      @johncraig2623 2 місяці тому +1

      @markphillips3341 Years ago, a dear friend, who had been to different schools than I had, insisted it was exactly 22/7. We looked at what the calculator showed when we hit the pi key versus 22 divided by 7. It's different at the 1000ths place: 22/7 is 3.142857 (right-of-decimal digits repeat) rather than 3.14159265... So 22/7 is slightly too large. I'm not sure my friend was convinced; irrational numbers can be a hard concept to wrap one's head around.

    • @cheriem432
      @cheriem432 2 місяці тому

      I thought this also.

    • @GH-oi2jf
      @GH-oi2jf 2 місяці тому

      @@johncraig2623 - Right. Someone who does not know that pi is irrational should not be writing about it.

  • @devendersinghattri4654
    @devendersinghattri4654 2 місяці тому

    Superb explanation !!!!!! Thats how the math needs be taught !!!!!!❤❤❤❤❤

  • @petestevens9740
    @petestevens9740 2 роки тому +18

    This is a really nice explanation of what Pi is / where it comes from. It is NOT a demonstration of how Archimedes determined a more precise value than "a little more than 3". Pi is only approximately 3.14, and Archimedes didn't have access to numbers written in decimal form anyway - they hadn't been invented yet. He was able to work out (using a very brilliant geometric method) that the number of diameters it takes to equal the circumference has to be between 3 10/70 and 3 10/71. That was enough precision for him, and it gives us 3 1/7 (22/7) which is about 3.148. Would love to see you make a video showing that method!

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  2 роки тому +10

      Thanks - It's really for the visually minded and mathematically challenged. For some people the maths only makes sense when there is a practical demonstration behind it. 😃

    • @betha8566
      @betha8566 Рік тому +2

      Yes, I read that he used hexagons inside and outside a circle and doubled them until he got to 96 sides. Then he found out the perimeter that way into the fractions you described.

    • @betha8566
      @betha8566 Рік тому

      @@shooraynerdrawing I enjoyed your explanation. I always thought of pi as "just a number," but now I "see" that it's 3.141592... DIAMETERS of a circle!

    • @jgarrison1309
      @jgarrison1309 11 місяців тому

      Nice video. If you do this again, right around the six minute mark of the video, when you were getting three and a half and a then three and a quarter, measure the line with your ruler... to that mark... and divide that by the diameter of your circle. Use that as your decimal. You wrote down 3.14 out of nowhere because that was what we were told pi was in school. The straight line distance divided by the diameter of your wheel is the way to go, if you don't know about 3.14 ahead of time.

    • @billshiff2060
      @billshiff2060 10 місяців тому +3

      22/7 (3.1428) was Archimedes upper boundary for PI not PI itself. Archimedes said PI lies between 3.1408 and 3.1428 which is approximately 3.141. Of course he stated it in fractions not decimals. 223/71 < π < 22/7 or 3.1408 < π < 3.1428 So pi must be ~ 3.141_

  • @Kevin-S
    @Kevin-S 2 місяці тому +1

    This is a very nice explanation. But you seemed to guess where the center of the wheel was when you had a compass available!

  • @jimmymiracleart
    @jimmymiracleart 2 місяці тому

    I absolutely loved the entire video and even the drawing of visual details of the wood grain helped me remember the explanation! Really well done!

  • @paulsinclair8829
    @paulsinclair8829 7 місяців тому +28

    Archimedes didn't do any of this. This was known *long* before him. Whoever first noticed that the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter was the same no matter how big the circle is lost to pre-history. Understanding why this was so came from the Greeks, but also well before Archimedes - though they didn't have a rigorous concept of arclength, so couldn't fully prove it (that only came in the Renaissance). What Archimedes did was show that the *area* of circle is half the product of its circumference and radius (thus deriving the pi r squared formula). He used an approach of refining approximations that must later would develop into calculus. He then also used similar methods to find formulas for the surface area and volume of a sphere, which was his proudest accomplishment.

    • @savvassyrmopoulos5570
      @savvassyrmopoulos5570 7 місяців тому +1

      I think he introduced the "exhausting method", an immature way of integration

    • @jonnelson9760
      @jonnelson9760 7 місяців тому +4

      Probably was discovered by those who made cart wheels. It could have been used to figure out how long of boards they needed.

    • @xihangyang
      @xihangyang 7 місяців тому +2

      he know but as a scientist he need to test it out for himself by tgis cardwhiel experience

    • @bojokowski
      @bojokowski 6 місяців тому

      Does it feel odd to anyone that our final paper math answer for the area has no end when we can see that there is clearly and end to its area..?

    • @ThisPossumKnits
      @ThisPossumKnits 6 місяців тому +3

      @@jonnelson9760 what would that have to do with the circumference? I don't think they cared how far a cart would move in one rotation of the wheel

  • @jimaanders7527
    @jimaanders7527 5 місяців тому +1

    I went to school only a little while after Archimedes and we learned about rolling the disk along a line.

  • @materialmirage
    @materialmirage 3 місяці тому +1

    The budget on this production is astronomically incalculable.

  • @robinbrowne5419
    @robinbrowne5419 8 місяців тому

    That is a very simple explanation which anybody can understand. I like the simple drawing of the wheel too.
    🙂👍

  • @Narsuitus
    @Narsuitus 7 місяців тому +3

    The metric system was not around during the time of Archimedes.
    What measuring units did he actually use?

    • @nenadmse
      @nenadmse Місяць тому

      But they don't know that.

  • @dalegreer3095
    @dalegreer3095 7 місяців тому +1

    Skip ahead to 5:45. You're welcome.

  • @lampy6070
    @lampy6070 Рік тому +1

    So, by using this formula (l=dxπ), you can calculate the lenght the wheel will cross when you roll it one full circle based on its diametar.

  • @outthinkersubliminalfacts
    @outthinkersubliminalfacts 8 місяців тому +2

    The 3.14 constant comes from: whenever you divide the circumference of any circle to its diagonal from the center; no matter how big or small the circle is you always get 3.14

  • @thomasharding1838
    @thomasharding1838 7 місяців тому +1

    OK. You caught the "mm" ! Very good and it was fun watching. Thanks

  • @Bpon-141T
    @Bpon-141T 13 днів тому

    Wow this is cool its cool to know about this especially bc i already know 93 digits of pi by memory

  • @danielparsons2859
    @danielparsons2859 3 роки тому +23

    I thought it was a complex question and in fact I found a beautifully simple answer in this video. Thank you. Consequently I've now subscribed.

    • @cheriem432
      @cheriem432 2 місяці тому +1

      Most math is beautifully simple. This is why I love it.

  • @legendaryfailure
    @legendaryfailure 2 роки тому +3

    This is the best explanation, and I refuse to learn anything else any other way

  • @HenrikMyrhaug
    @HenrikMyrhaug 9 місяців тому +34

    I always learned: "Circumference = π • diameter"
    I always thought everyone understood pi as being the ratio between the circumference and diameter of a circle, but this video brought back a memory.
    When I first saw someone write C=2πr, I was so confused why they used a more complicated and abstract formula. C=πd is so much simpler and tells you explicitly what you showed in this video.
    It makes sense if you learned C=2πr, you wouldn't get the same intuitive understanding of what pi is. By the way, I would recommend you measure the diameter instead of the radius, because measuring the diameter gets you a smaller relative error of the measurement.

    • @favesongslist
      @favesongslist 9 місяців тому +2

      maybe as it is helpful with the area of a circle being π r2

    • @Numenor7
      @Numenor7 7 місяців тому +2

      I had the exact same comment just said a different way before I saw yours 😂

    • @TheLostDarkly
      @TheLostDarkly 7 місяців тому +2

      Think of it this way: if I asked you to sketch the circumference of a circle, π would get you only halfway there. You need 2π radians for a complete circle. Now that you have your 2π radians, what's the circumference? Well, that's easy, 2πr. Sure, 2πr and dπ will get you the same circumference, but that's an answer to a single question. The deeper you go into math and physics, the more important the radius becomes. But besides all of that, what would be a more intuitive way of finding the circumference, going all the way around the circle and multiplying by the radius, or stopping halfway and multiplying by the diameter?

    • @captain34ca
      @captain34ca 7 місяців тому +4

      because if you use a compass to draw the circle it's easy to use the same compass to accurately measure the radius. ask a carpenter.

    • @daninraleigh
      @daninraleigh 7 місяців тому

      @@captain34ca So, are you suggesting that 1st graders should be issued a sharp pointy tool?

  • @terry_willis
    @terry_willis 8 місяців тому

    Excellent graphic explanation. However, how would one derive 3.14. . . . or out to X number of decimals mathematically? I'm told it's a non-repeating decimal. If you measured cut outs you could do it, but there's always a slight inaccuracy doing it that way. Is there a precise mathematical method?

  • @megadismayed
    @megadismayed 7 місяців тому +1

    Although this knowledge was out there, I learned something new at 65 and this is a new learning. wish the teachers - back then, used this theory

  • @antonnym214
    @antonnym214 28 днів тому +1

    Nice channel! I just found and subscribed to you. When seeking the center of a circle (which, I must say, you eyeballed very well!) would be a good time to demonstrate finding the center of a circle with a right-angle ruler (carpenter's square) using Thale's Theorem. That would be a good one to show next time you are finding a circle center.

  • @freesk8
    @freesk8 7 місяців тому

    Great explanation! And good cartooning, too! :)

  • @kingnothing735
    @kingnothing735 3 роки тому +1

    What I came for: The history of pi
    Why I stay: A quick art attack craft

  • @devendramattai2738
    @devendramattai2738 7 місяців тому

    Excellent teaching sir...I bet you are a great teacher.

  • @alphalunamare
    @alphalunamare 7 місяців тому +1

    Archimedes is said to have built odometers for the Roman's. He based it upon the method shown here but he was a little cleverer. He marked of points on a road ar 'diameter intervals into the distance. He started of as You but only stopped when the wheel arrow was on a 'diameter point'. His first fix gave him 7 whole turns for 22 diameters thus giving Pi a ration of 22/7. He foud a better one on a longer road where he got a better fix of 113 whole turns in 355 diameters giving Pi a more accurate ratio of 355/113 .... this is the value he probably used in his odometer designs. Some consider is possible that He designed The AntiKythera Mechanism.

  • @speedomars
    @speedomars 7 місяців тому +4

    The story is a bit more complicated. The Egyptians and the Babylonians understood this ratio too. But it was Archimedes that determined the ratio more precisely. Archimedes did not name it however. According to Petr Beckmann's A History of Pi, the Greek letter π was first used for this purpose by William Jones in 1706, probably as an abbreviation of periphery.

    • @Elf_Hour
      @Elf_Hour 7 місяців тому

      Indeed, associating Pi with mathematics results in a form of Code ... it is not the True symbol for what it claims to represent. For some unknown reason, the true symbol has been lost to modern thought... but it is something that can be 'rediscovered' if someone is so inclined)

  • @9Ballr
    @9Ballr 8 місяців тому +2

    I cannot tell a lie,
    Cherry is still my favorite pi.

  • @gerarddonovan4145
    @gerarddonovan4145 3 роки тому +1

    Brilliant explaination

  • @michaelmayrend313
    @michaelmayrend313 7 місяців тому +1

    Interesting that you decided to create a road, and then reinvent the wheel. : )

  • @TworutoSoFlo
    @TworutoSoFlo Рік тому +1

    Amazing explanation of pi. I've never thought that's how someone would discover it. 👍

  • @wychan7574
    @wychan7574 8 місяців тому +19

    It was discovered when e escaped from a pie,and later they found e too.

    • @outtakontroll3334
      @outtakontroll3334 7 місяців тому +2

      naturally

    • @VCT3333
      @VCT3333 7 місяців тому +1

      I discovered pie when I moved to the USA from India. We didn't have pie in India growing up. Key Lime is my favorite!

  • @awesome_sawce
    @awesome_sawce 2 роки тому +1

    Archimedes didn't have sophisticated tools, all he had was an old wooden cartwheel.
    Luckily, we have sophisticated tools like,
    *Kellog's Crunchy Nut Cornflakes*

  • @Lightmaker5
    @Lightmaker5 10 місяців тому +6

    Chuck Norris needed a pick up truck, so he invented pi.

    • @andy42x
      @andy42x 10 місяців тому +1

      I'm dopey and don't get it. 😢

  • @VoicesofMusic
    @VoicesofMusic 7 місяців тому

    Archimedes calculated π by drawing a regular hexagon inside and outside a circle, then successively doubling the number of sides until he reached a 96-sided regular polygon.

  • @chickey333
    @chickey333 8 місяців тому

    This is the first time I ever heard a lesson regarding circumference and diameter of circles

  • @lowlightevangelist9431
    @lowlightevangelist9431 7 місяців тому

    Amazing, this opened my brain, thanks!

  • @MrGyges
    @MrGyges 7 місяців тому +1

    Got it ! Thanks to you ( and Archimedes ). I never knew & now I do.

  • @andreranulfo-dev8607
    @andreranulfo-dev8607 7 місяців тому

    For sure. If my teacher taught me that way, it would be easy to understand.

  • @aranjaysharma
    @aranjaysharma 3 роки тому

    This will help me a LOT in my school project thank you sooooo much mind sir

  • @cheriem432
    @cheriem432 2 місяці тому +1

    I am an engineer so of course I've used pi in my calculations, but this explanation is fascinating! And the fact that pi is also an irrational number impresses me even more! Then there's the calculation of e, imaginary numbers, . . . (sigh).

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  2 місяці тому +1

      Im getting really intrigued by the Heisenberg cut at the moment - that’s even more weird than the imaginary numbers LOL

    • @cheriem432
      @cheriem432 2 місяці тому +2

      @@shooraynerdrawing So now I'll have to research *that*! 🙂

  • @weggquiz
    @weggquiz Рік тому

    awesome explanation

  • @achembusinessidea5306
    @achembusinessidea5306 2 роки тому +2

    Truly you are one of the best teachers i have ever come across.
    Very useful video sir.
    I would like to have this book in India .
    Pls tell me how may can I purchase it from you ??

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  2 роки тому

      Thank you! It should be avaioable ithrough book stores :)

  • @patricksinon8496
    @patricksinon8496 2 місяці тому

    Why go through the etxra 2 pii r when pi d suffices?

  • @janjager2906
    @janjager2906 7 місяців тому

    A gifted artist you are!

  • @Paul-lm5gv
    @Paul-lm5gv 2 місяці тому

    Fascinating!

  • @fifthavenue8505
    @fifthavenue8505 2 місяці тому

    EXECELLENT! THANK YOU!

  • @Papi_21
    @Papi_21 4 роки тому +5

    I swear if someone told me this I would have done pure Maths instead maths literacy in school 😂

  • @eworthen843
    @eworthen843 9 місяців тому +1

    Mr. Rayner: You did a great job on the arts and crafts. It would make for a neat after-school project. But you only guessed the .14 part of pi. Maybe guesstimate is a better word. You took the idea that we already know that pi is 3.14, and you drew a model that showed where the .14 would fall. But never do you say how the exact .14 is calculated. If I were guessing like you did, and I used you "halves" method to go from 3.5 to 3.25, I would have put pi at 3.125.after all, any dullard of a mathematician in Archimedes' day could have told you that pi was between 3.125 and 3.25. Because of this, you have done Archimedes a huge disservice. After all, he did not draw out a wheel and a road and measure it. He used the method of exhaustion to predict the upper and lower limits of pi by finding the areas of polygons inscribed and circumscribed about a circle. He continued dividing these polygons until he had polygons inside and outside the circle with 96 sides. He thus set the limits of pi as 3.140845 < π < 3.1428571. I like fun and games as much as the next guy. But you did say that Archimedes was a genius for his discovery and then took the conversation to the level of a third grader. Not cool.

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  9 місяців тому

      It's not a proof or a guess - its a visual explanation of why, for those that don't get maths but do get visual representations - as you will see from the comments. Mathematicians wish to find fault - non mathematicians go - "Oh I see! Now I understand!"

    • @eworthen843
      @eworthen843 9 місяців тому

      @@shooraynerdrawing Then you shouldn't attribute the demonstration to Archimedes.

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  9 місяців тому

      that's the creative part!

  • @bastiaanstapelberg9018
    @bastiaanstapelberg9018 6 місяців тому

    Leuk uitgelegd.....aanrader voor scholieren

  • @gedtoon6451
    @gedtoon6451 2 роки тому

    I like the rounded digits on your calculator. Who is the manufacturer?

  • @tanksblitz4934
    @tanksblitz4934 2 місяці тому

    Wow great video thanks

  • @toni4729
    @toni4729 2 місяці тому

    No one ever told me either. Thanks, it's high time teachers knew their job.

  • @vanhetgoor
    @vanhetgoor 6 місяців тому

    When I went to school it was explained in a manner that it could be understood, But not more then that, I still have a great question about π and that is, how is Pi calculated, where do all those number behind the comma (or decimal point in US) come from? It can not be that the π with so many decimals can be measured. What is the proper way to calculate and not measure?

  • @Gubdeer
    @Gubdeer 2 роки тому +1

    Great job!

  • @agentstona
    @agentstona 2 роки тому

    nice you showed the circumference and pi relation ship ,Is there a way to show the Area and pi relation ship too using cardboards ?

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  2 роки тому

      Oooh! I’ll have to think about that

    • @alansands256
      @alansands256 Рік тому

      See my reply under comment from "tom01". I don't use cardboard but I explain the relationship between Pi and area.

  • @paulhanger7242
    @paulhanger7242 Рік тому

    I think if you explained this to school kids they would enjoy mathematics more. Such a great demonstration

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  Рік тому +1

      That's why I made the video. Mathematicians wouldn't think to explain this for visual thjinkers!

    • @СофияИванова-х6й
      @СофияИванова-х6й Рік тому

      Hello ! Please tell me if the circle was smaller and stopped to say 2 and something ? What happen ?

  • @timl.b.2095
    @timl.b.2095 7 місяців тому +15

    Gotta respect Archimedes working that out. But you know what, I gotta respect at least as much the people who made nice round wheels out of boards.

    • @R.Akerman-oz1tf
      @R.Akerman-oz1tf 7 місяців тому +1

      I sure would like to try that cereal.

    • @mal2ksc
      @mal2ksc 7 місяців тому

      Roll a wheel on something harder than it is for long enough and it will become round. ☸

    • @ThisPossumKnits
      @ThisPossumKnits 6 місяців тому

      @@mal2ksc unless it resonates

  • @robertbour77
    @robertbour77 4 роки тому +4

    Very helpful! That looks like an interesting book!

  • @ManojKumar-ef2og
    @ManojKumar-ef2og 3 роки тому

    The use of the home avalible parts really caught my attention

  • @bettekavalec1454
    @bettekavalec1454 7 місяців тому

    Fantastic explanation!!!

  • @len9518
    @len9518 3 місяці тому

    Beautiful!!

  • @Himachal.culture
    @Himachal.culture 2 роки тому

    thanks very for this easy concept.

  • @stephen8433
    @stephen8433 7 місяців тому

    How does knowing how to figure this out benefit some one. What is can you make with it?

  • @montyyy
    @montyyy 3 роки тому

    Thanks this video is very useful

  • @solaokusanya955
    @solaokusanya955 8 місяців тому

    Eureka!!!!.... Today everything comes together in my mind!!

  • @СофияИванова-х6й

    Hello ! Please tell me if your circle was smaller and stopped to say 2 and something ? What happen ?

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  Рік тому

      if the circle is smaller or larger the ratio is still exactly the same

  • @MarceloCarmello-y8s
    @MarceloCarmello-y8s 7 місяців тому

    Very smart, thank you!

  • @YeshuaIsTheTruth
    @YeshuaIsTheTruth 3 роки тому

    I just subscribed because of this explanation.

  • @ericj199
    @ericj199 2 роки тому

    Wow, great video!

  • @Sam-lj4bm
    @Sam-lj4bm 11 місяців тому

    So it will work in every rotating body?

  • @thomasharding1838
    @thomasharding1838 7 місяців тому +9

    And, except that Archimedes found pi's value was somewhere between 3 1/7 and 3 10/71. He didn't have numerical decimalization available at the time.

    • @alphalunamare
      @alphalunamare 7 місяців тому

      Decimals are attributed to Egypt 6 years before his death so he might have been aware of them for 'private' use rather in explanations for the masses.

  • @dogslife4831
    @dogslife4831 4 роки тому +1

    Delightful video

  • @juletraylor5829
    @juletraylor5829 7 місяців тому

    perfect.....thank you

  • @nathangold9775
    @nathangold9775 7 місяців тому +2

    I thought everyone knew that pi was the ratio of diameter to circumferences. You must have skipped the day they introduced pi in school.

    • @jazzracicot
      @jazzracicot 7 місяців тому

      I agree. It was explained so many times I have difficulties to believe someone never heard it.
      At least, his explanations are very good.

  • @joemontiel8726
    @joemontiel8726 Рік тому +8

    I wish there were more teachers like this guy!

  • @Donizen1
    @Donizen1 8 місяців тому +7

    Archimedes did not have decimals. He used fractions.

    • @fantasia55
      @fantasia55 6 місяців тому +2

      @@Donizen1 He also didn't have a video camera.

  • @patrickhuynh1766
    @patrickhuynh1766 2 роки тому

    6:28 "No one ever told me that, no one. If they did I wouldve understood"

  • @kmyc89
    @kmyc89 9 місяців тому

    I have seen that animation many times on Wikipedia,
    but I never thought, it was the origin (not to mention, that Archimedes wasn't the only, but the most accurate Mathematician)

  • @zprime4624
    @zprime4624 3 роки тому

    Sir i dont know if you are seeing this but im begging. Please tell me the name of your background music
    Its really awesome 😭

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  3 роки тому

      it was written for me especially by the wonderful @cleffernotes ua-cam.com/users/cleffernotes

    • @zprime4624
      @zprime4624 3 роки тому

      @@shooraynerdrawingThank you but Sir i tried to look for it there are so many songs 😥

  • @albertobernado4103
    @albertobernado4103 2 роки тому +2

    But who was the first person to discover that this circumference/diameter ratio is a ratio with infinite value? Where was this discovered and how exactly was this "measurement" found? Can anyone help me find this information?

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  2 роки тому

      We don’t know that Pi is infinite!

    • @alansands256
      @alansands256 Рік тому

      I believe it IS infinite. See my reply under "tom01" comment.

  • @cyberghost4043
    @cyberghost4043 5 місяців тому

    Thank you Sir, now I understand🥹🙏❤️Godbless Sir

  • @olmostgudinaf8100
    @olmostgudinaf8100 7 місяців тому +1

    If your maths teacher "haven't told you", then they've done an abysmal job.

  • @demon7305
    @demon7305 3 роки тому +3

    let's all agree if I had watched this my exam would have been simpler and more fun to memorize.

  • @LesleLeBang
    @LesleLeBang 3 роки тому +5

    -Take the first three odd integers: 1,3,5
    -Double them thusly: 113355
    -Divide the last three by the first three thusly: 355/113
    There ya go, Pi accurate to 6 decimal places!

    • @OXIR
      @OXIR 3 роки тому

      Oh thank you for this information

    • @shooraynerdrawing
      @shooraynerdrawing  3 роки тому

      Doesn’t help nonmathematicians who are visual thinkers! 😃

  • @cuddly_panda7409
    @cuddly_panda7409 2 роки тому

    And then there’s my teacher who gave me homework to search how pi how was created?Yaaaaaaaaaaa

  • @AllanEngelhardt0
    @AllanEngelhardt0 4 роки тому +4

    I love these. More please :)

  • @IAmKingEnvy
    @IAmKingEnvy 4 місяці тому

    if was taught this in school i would have enjoyed math class

  • @richardseed8253
    @richardseed8253 8 місяців тому

    I remember in year seven being asked to measure the tins in mums cupboard. Diameter and circumference. Most of us got three and a remainder.

  • @hihi-td9jd
    @hihi-td9jd 4 роки тому +2

    Awesome!

  • @takeshisatou2371
    @takeshisatou2371 3 роки тому +6

    engineers: pi=3. Take it or leave it

    • @xlerb2286
      @xlerb2286 7 місяців тому +1

      Also "5 eh? So let's call it 2 squared, for really large values of 2. That's close enough for what we're doing". I heard that one pretty much verbatim from a couple crusty old engineers. ;)

    • @jmjm1920
      @jmjm1920 Місяць тому

      A coconut not a circle