جزاك الله خيرًا ونفع بكم. يوجد خطأ فقط في الترجمة في 5:14 ، النصيرية ليسوا هم الصليبيين Crusaders بل هي فرقة باطنية في الشام. أيضًا، كلمة Classifying في 7:02 غير دقيقة، بالأحرى هي Writing لأن المقصود الكتاب وليس Categorization.
Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him, did not have the extreme reverence some Muslims had for the pagan Greek philosophers. He knew that a simple Muslim with pure fitrah is better than the greatest Greek philosopher. He was able to see that most of the problems the kuffar are trying to solve are the results of their corrupted fitrah and false religion.
The change of lawaazim, if we agree that it true, could be attributed to a growth in the person of the shaykh, the important thing here is, is what he is saying true or not? Engage with his arguments and conversations surrounding them will not bring anything worthwhile to the conversation.
جزاك الله خيرًا ونفع بكم.
يوجد خطأ فقط في الترجمة في 5:14 ، النصيرية ليسوا هم الصليبيين Crusaders بل هي فرقة باطنية في الشام.
أيضًا، كلمة Classifying في 7:02 غير دقيقة، بالأحرى هي Writing لأن المقصود الكتاب وليس Categorization.
Very interesting, JazakAllahKhair
Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy on him, did not have the extreme reverence some Muslims had for the pagan Greek philosophers. He knew that a simple Muslim with pure fitrah is better than the greatest Greek philosopher. He was able to see that most of the problems the kuffar are trying to solve are the results of their corrupted fitrah and false religion.
Didn't understand what he said at 5:45. Concept of non existence amd associated capacity he didn't agree with.
Needs explanation
The change of lawaazim, if we agree that it true, could be attributed to a growth in the person of the shaykh, the important thing here is, is what he is saying true or not? Engage with his arguments and conversations surrounding them will not bring anything worthwhile to the conversation.