A living and loving God can only be understood with evil and suffering all around the world since humans walked the earth by the cross of Jesus. And everything surrounding it, leading to it and from it.
It seems to be my impression that even if you acknowledge that God allows evil and suffering, the last thing a person should do is reject God because of it. Because by rejecting God, they are forfeiting their only way to escape the pain and suffering of the world. This seems to be the worst kind of irony I can think of. It's like destroying a drawbridge because it isn't lowered.
The crux of the issue here is that if the world is full of suffering and God doesn't intervene equally for everyone to alleviate it An image of God based on his creation is starkly different than Loving God proposed by the speaker
A living and loving God can only be understood with evil and suffering all around the world since humans walked the earth by the cross of Jesus. And everything surrounding it, leading to it and from it.
It seems to be my impression that even if you acknowledge that God allows evil and suffering, the last thing a person should do is reject God because of it. Because by rejecting God, they are forfeiting their only way to escape the pain and suffering of the world. This seems to be the worst kind of irony I can think of. It's like destroying a drawbridge because it isn't lowered.
The crux of the issue here is that if the world is full of suffering and God doesn't intervene equally for everyone to alleviate it
An image of God based on his creation is starkly different than Loving God proposed by the speaker