It's just the same as a simulator -the ships' handling is mimicked of course but at least you're not staring at a computer screen all day. Er but that's all the benefits I'm able to accept
@@marks6663 It's not manned, it's piloted. It's a ship is it? Then it's piloted. Manned is a word used in a sentence or conversation when a machine, cannon, engineless vehicle, etc., that require men to move, push, rotate, shift, etc. That's the term used when men man these vehicles. Manned is not a term for ships, planes, radio controlled flown models, pilotless aircraft, trains, etc. These are operated, not manned, by people. And, using the term 'unmanned' is also wrong. If an engineless vehicle, a cart, trailer, a cannon in the military, etc., is manned by women, 'manned' doesn't match and neither 'unmanned'. Would you rather say un-womanned? See, it doesn't make sense in any way you can think of, especially nowadays where women are involved, even if they're all females manning a cannon, the 'manning' term doesn't apply either. I mean, how women man a cannon, vehicle, etc., when they're all females? And if male and female are operating or handling an engineless vehicle, cannon, etc., what term will you use, manned, womanned? Like I said, stupid and equally confusing English. Manned, unmanned should be phased out if the idiots at Oxford and other Universities are to put things into perspective for both sexes. Manned doesn't exist if women are operating, moving, shifting, rotating, fighting with vehicles, cannons, etc. It only applies to men as in man-ned or unman-ned. But, for women the term should be 'handling', (for both sexes). Totally different, and that only applies in the handling, pushing, rotating, etc., of engineless vehicles, cannons, trailers, carts, etc., anything that requires manual labour without driving, piloting, flying, driving, etc.
@@mickcarson8504 You ought not to have bothered with the second part -are you troll or something? A human is referred to as a man to make it easier to communicate and no one in their right ahhafafhadfahfsafafhhsadhf mind has any problem with that
What if it's a woman operating it? Are you going to say 'womanned'?The correct term is 'piloted', not 'manned'. I tell you what, dear bro, the English language is fucked. Never used to be like this in my days. If you talk shit, spelled bad, or poor grammar, that fucking teacher would have given you an unforgettable 10 or more caning whacks till your hands are red.
Absolutely cool ! good job guys !!
A nice facility to let my small sons play. This is like playing with a model plane and try to fly with a real plane. Just not working.
It's just the same as a simulator -the ships' handling is mimicked of course but at least you're not staring at a computer screen all day. Er but that's all the benefits I'm able to accept
Manned model ship? Is that grammar? How does a model ship become manned? Did you mean 'Piloted model ship? I like the English language, NOT!
it's manned because there is a man onboard.
@@marks6663
It's not manned, it's piloted. It's a ship is it? Then it's piloted. Manned is a word used in a sentence or conversation when a machine, cannon, engineless vehicle, etc., that require men to move, push, rotate, shift, etc. That's the term used when men man these vehicles. Manned is not a term for ships, planes, radio controlled flown models, pilotless aircraft, trains, etc. These are operated, not manned, by people. And, using the term 'unmanned' is also wrong. If an engineless vehicle, a cart, trailer, a cannon in the military, etc., is manned by women, 'manned' doesn't match and neither 'unmanned'. Would you rather say un-womanned? See, it doesn't make sense in any way you can think of, especially nowadays where women are involved, even if they're all females manning a cannon, the 'manning' term doesn't apply either. I mean, how women man a cannon, vehicle, etc., when they're all females? And if male and female are operating or handling an engineless vehicle, cannon, etc., what term will you use, manned, womanned? Like I said, stupid and equally confusing English. Manned, unmanned should be phased out if the idiots at Oxford and other Universities are to put things into perspective for both sexes. Manned doesn't exist if women are operating, moving, shifting, rotating, fighting with vehicles, cannons, etc. It only applies to men as in man-ned or unman-ned. But, for women the term should be 'handling', (for both sexes). Totally different, and that only applies in the handling, pushing, rotating, etc., of engineless vehicles, cannons, trailers, carts, etc., anything that requires manual labour without driving, piloting, flying, driving, etc.
@@mickcarson8504 You ought not to have bothered with the second part -are you troll or something? A human is referred to as a man to make it easier to communicate and no one in their right ahhafafhadfahfsafafhhsadhf mind has any problem with that
What if it's a woman operating it? Are you going to say 'womanned'?The correct term is 'piloted', not 'manned'. I tell you what, dear bro, the English language is fucked. Never used to be like this in my days. If you talk shit, spelled bad, or poor grammar, that fucking teacher would have given you an unforgettable 10 or more caning whacks till your hands are red.
@@RoskinGreenrake Better tell him he's right, the poor guy must have some lack of affection.