I'm getting started on this software, and I must say that this video has proven to be extremely valuable. Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge.
Amazing work! Super excited to start using these latest vision features! Been anxious about how my placement accuracy with TQFP-100 will turn out for an upcoming build but not anymore! 😍
I'm using ELP FullHD cameras, but at reduced 720p resolution, which then runs at 60fps. But the recommended camera is the ELP 720p one, because you can then attach wtwo cameras to one USB port, whereas with my cameras I need two ports (bandwidth). See the recommended cameras in the Wiki: github.com/openpnp/openpnp/wiki/Build-FAQ#what-should-i-build
I'm using the ELP Full HD camera No. ELP-USBFHD01M. "Full HD USB Camera Module 1080P USB2.0 OV2710 Color Sensor Support MJPEG". I recommend longer lenses than they usually advertise (>= 6mm).
I forgot to mention that this Full HD camera requires two root USB ports on the computer, while the recommended ELP 720p camera model can be operated on one USB port.
Is there any plan to incorporate this into the main release any time soon? I don't want to end up having to use test branch in production :-( But the feature would be really great - as the ESP32 module I need to place is rather bi g :-) (at least too big for the LumenPNP V2 that I have)
Yes, I guess the test branch will be integrated back soon. But that also means I consider the current test branch very mature, in fact it has many bug fixes the stable branch has not. 😉
I'm getting started on this software, and I must say that this video has proven to be extremely valuable. Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge.
;-)
Cheers Mark for an awesome job, and thank you for the time you are putting into the OpenPnP to make it better and better.
Amazing work! Super excited to start using these latest vision features! Been anxious about how my placement accuracy with TQFP-100 will turn out for an upcoming build but not anymore! 😍
Really awesome developments!
Thanks!🤭
Awesome job as usual. I don't think I've got any excuses left to try openpnp on the Neoden4
Fantastic. Can you say what bootom camera model you are using ?
I'm using ELP FullHD cameras, but at reduced 720p resolution, which then runs at 60fps. But the recommended camera is the ELP 720p one, because you can then attach wtwo cameras to one USB port, whereas with my cameras I need two ports (bandwidth).
See the recommended cameras in the Wiki:
github.com/openpnp/openpnp/wiki/Build-FAQ#what-should-i-build
Hello Engineer, I had a question, what kind of camera did you use for these devices, do you have a part number?
I'm using the ELP Full HD camera No. ELP-USBFHD01M. "Full HD USB Camera Module 1080P USB2.0 OV2710 Color Sensor Support MJPEG". I recommend longer lenses than they usually advertise (>= 6mm).
I forgot to mention that this Full HD camera requires two root USB ports on the computer, while the recommended ELP 720p camera model can be operated on one USB port.
Great feature
Is there any plan to incorporate this into the main release any time soon? I don't want to end up having to use test branch in production :-( But the feature would be really great - as the ESP32 module I need to place is rather bi g :-) (at least too big for the LumenPNP V2 that I have)
Yes, I guess the test branch will be integrated back soon. But that also means I consider the current test branch very mature, in fact it has many bug fixes the stable branch has not. 😉
the footprint tab on my openpnp doesn't have which version you are using
You need the testing version. openpnp.org/test-downloads/