Lamarck vs Darwin - Biology GCSE | kayscience.com
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 чер 2024
- Visit www.KayScience.com for access to 800+ GCSE science videos, quizzes, exam resources AND daily science and maths LIVE TUITION!!! In this video you will learn all the science for this topic to get a grade 9 or A* in your science exams!
Lamarck vs Darwin - Biology GCSE | kayscience.com
All content, music, images, worksheets are the property of kayscience.com
We aim for you to get 100% in your exam by revising and learning with KayScience.
Visit www.KayScience.com for access to 800+ science videos, quizzes, exam resources AND daily science and maths tuition!!!
WITH THIS VIDEO I CAN UNDERSTAND ALL FOR MY HOMEWORWS , THANK YOU SO MUCH .
Thanks, I understood this better than when I read my textbook
Thanks this is gonna help me past my test
Sir, if lamarck talks about adaptation due to need and Darwin also talks about adaptations then what's the difference?
the difference is that Lamarcks says that for example if you are born skinny and then exercise a lot and get buffed, your children will get buffed as well. Darwin says that if you are skinny your children will have a chance to be skinny as well, but not necessarily, if one is buffed then his buff genes will be passed on.
so basically one is the adaptation of individuals vs the adaptation of generations of species.
Hey, thanks dude I learn for my homework. Thanks :D
So happy this video has helped you! Check out kayscience.com for 1000s of FREE quiz questions 🔥
But the giraffe isn’t getting a neck extension a couple of times each year…
science!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@Jessica Uwadiae NO 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
ty uwu
I feel like it's linked with epigenetic isn't it ?
Thanks a lot
you are very welcome :)
Please sign up to a free KayScience account at www.kayscience.com and get all quizzes for free OR you can use the code online50 to get 50% off access to ALL our KaySccience videos!
“undeniable fact” , depends on your definition of what a fact is, a fact as in immutable truth, then you’re wrong.
darwinian evolution has flaws, precisely why“the third way of evolution “ exists, also every 100 years or so a paradigm shift occurs, don’t bite your tongue too early.
Tq sir
no
The dying the hair once example is nonsense for use as a comparison. Dying the hair over a hundred or thousands of generations and having the same result would be a better example but then it may prove Lamark's Theory true (If you had a few millenia to test it). European Women with different coloured curly hair i find an interesting one. Is it from Generations of Hair braiding and platting? or from failing to Brush the hair? What benefit would it serve in natural selection for head hair to start just growing in different directions and into complete curls? An attractant perhaps? Or as Dr Becker from the TV show says ''The curls start deep in the brain and grow all the way out!'' Suggesting they're crazier. Lol. My daughter has beautiful incredible blonde ringlets, Like springs. So, all you curlywurly's out there don't go all crazy at me. Ok. Haha.
Hmmmm
Pretty bad example with woman's hair.
Acquired and saved to ADN. That saved part is omitted, that's why it fails. Then how to save a human desire to our gene? The flesh? (Which part? Heart?, brain?,Guts?, Limb or part directly concerned? No one really knows!) need to be informed [and ordered?AskedPolitely!? to accept] that this characteristic is desired [over the existing one]. Evolution if it exists is a mystery. Unless after 3500 years we are made to spontaneously evolve after they killed us all (of course) by Anunakis, or some other CongregationOfInterstellarSpecies!!! (Joking!)
good explanation sir
but as we r Indians we can speak n uderstand england english
we r poor to understand american english
This is England English
I mean its alright, overrated as **** in my opinion