My dad has 2 of them! They r great for comfort and u really feel safe in them! Can't wait to get new rolls Royce! Dad says it may be a pain cause u have to charge it but we will see!
I work at BMW, a few months back somebody bought an X5 M and like all new cars it came with all the PDI stickers on it. They even brag about the efficient dynamics on cars like this, thinking that a 11mpg 4X4 is an eco-queen for having stop start.
Holy Shiittttt. This car weights 2380kg!!! 0-100 4.0secs, 1/4mile in 12.5. braking in 106ft!! With all that size and weight, This is an angry beast sitting on wheels ;'(
@Illmatic662 the panamera turbo with carbon ceramic can do it in 109 ft!! don't even think motor trend or the others do test for cars for free!! sure they will exaggerate in every thing..
@ianhasnolife I know I was playing dumb. The Base 535i starts at $56,500.00 The M full loaded can top 104K 4 Passenger SUV Speed Demon in Style, Comfort and Cargo Room lol
i really like mercedez and bmw, really solid beautiful cars but i just wish they were more reliable. mercedez is less reliable than bmw and also feels like a tank or a boat, bmw have better response, but both are expensive for the reliability level. i like this suv because it looks sexy, high perfomance, but im sure its a gas guzzler not to mention the headache of fixing any repairs if needed.
Whats the point, the cars have different labels for a reason: Sedan - large single/family city car Station wagon - city car for a wroking person or a mom SUV - off road car with space Van - family 6+ person car Its like me going out to a dealership to buy a van because i wanna speed, same with the x6m, who wants a fast suv crossover...?
Get an srt8 jeep and supercharge it and exhaust if you can't afford this, or if you dont like that sound, you can can never go wrong with full exhaust on american v8s. 4 seconds to 60 is quick. tune it for more boost and get in the 3's
It looks nice and whatever, and is pretty fast, but for me there really isn't a point in starting with an SUV when you're making a performance vehicle. Having a high center of gravity and something that performs terrible off road is useless. It's not a trophy truck by any stretch, it'd be a terrible race car, and it would never work for serious off roading. On top of all those things, SUV's are really heavy. It's basically putting all of your effort and resources into a bad initial idea.
@CalebRulez2 the M division is way better. AMG just stick a huge engine in there cars and dont change much where the M division change almost everything... thats why there are more AMG models than M models. because it takes waaaaaaaay longer to create an M model than an AMG model.
@TheVasquez112 yeah? cadillac cts-v wagon, costs less and is faster. If you want to go cheap there is the subaru wrx sti premium and the list does on. You cant really justify this car, horrible fuel efficiency, not a lot of room, not very fast, and not nice to look at. It does a lot, but it doesn't do any of it well.
I can't wait to see this engine in a more deserving car (M5). But I am going to miss that V10. Its kind of funny but this only seats 4 and the M5 seats 5? Ok :(
0-60 in 4 seconds. Crazy 1/4 mile. now I ask...why? no club would let you Autocross or road race this thing without signing a 10 page liability waiver...
It's not ok that this car weighs 1,000 lbs. more than my body-on-frame 1998 Mercury Mountaineer with AWD when they're basically the same size. I don't care if there's more technology in this thing and more metal for crash-worthiness. That all shouldn't add a half-ton to a car's weight. Also this is a modern, more efficient, premium drinking, lower-displacement motor, with a significantly better power to weight ratio than my Mountaineer and yet they get the same gas mileage. That's pathetic.
Lets create an SUV that can't haul, go off road or even snow, with minimal space in the cargo area, no head room and the most ugly exterior we can come up with. Next , lets create a 3 series convertible soft top that wont open.
SUVs shouldn't be high performance like this. They should be based on practicality. Get a sports car or supercar if you want performance. What a stupid vehicle. And I love BMW and an M3 is one of my favorite cars.
it only gets these numbers because its a car raised and the shape is exactly like a car but only like 2 inches taller in body hieght.. sad excuse for a suv
It's not for everyone, but if you want a performance SUV, this is one of the best.
The color is SICK!
My dad has 2 of them! They r great for comfort and u really feel safe in them! Can't wait to get new rolls Royce! Dad says it may be a pain cause u have to charge it but we will see!
I work at BMW, a few months back somebody bought an X5 M and like all new cars it came with all the PDI stickers on it. They even brag about the efficient dynamics on cars like this, thinking that a 11mpg 4X4 is an eco-queen for having stop start.
i wish your reviews were longer, but great stuff
Say whatchu want,but those numbers are pretty damn impressive
I love this! I'm not a fan of SUVs, but damn, BMW pulled it off.
Can't wait to see a re-tuned version of the X6 M's S63 in the new M5. That'll be epic
I think it looks really good.
This comment section is ancient
This car really has a nice road presence in real life, looks so aggressive from the rear
Thats the engine for the upcoming M5, the old E60 M5 sounded the BEST!
you have very good taste dude! if i say so MYSELF.
How is this the FIRST test?? Hasn't the X6M been out for a while now??
Which elite class is better? The BMW "M" class, or the Mercedes "AMG" class?
@n9athan they started joining in 07. but this is definitely another step in that direction
This is an another amazing car!
these are insane figures!! 4.0 to 100kmh?!!! 106 ft to 0!! that's simply sick sick..
@1kounter
so why is it called a "Sports" Utility Vehicle?
@nando8nando
Do you see those numbers? wheres your bmw?
@ooharloo what are the advantages of a performance SUV vs a performance Sedan?
If I was in the M design team I would be pissed off for such a powerful engine ending up in a pointless SUV. That's the nicest way I put it.
whats up with the NJ license plates?
Ive saw this car the other day and i talked to the owner and his is in love with it and i think iam aswell lol
@TimidALFONS0 an suv doesn't have to be an offroader take for example the gmc envoy
Holy Shiittttt. This car weights 2380kg!!! 0-100 4.0secs, 1/4mile in 12.5. braking in 106ft!! With all that size and weight, This is an angry beast sitting on wheels ;'(
@Illmatic662
the panamera turbo with carbon ceramic can do it in 109 ft!!
don't even think motor trend or the others do test for cars for free!!
sure they will exaggerate in every thing..
@ianhasnolife I know I was playing dumb. The Base 535i starts at $56,500.00 The M full loaded can top 104K 4 Passenger SUV Speed Demon in Style, Comfort and Cargo Room lol
@ultimaster1 a sedan can be performance like the evo, m3, cts-v etc. It's just crazy seeing an suv with crazy power! It's bad ass but it's not for me.
@ghrpdx its a bargain price for the speed against the range rover supercharged and porsche panarema
m5 costs the same amount. GTR is about 110k USD. What did You expect, a tag price of 50k? This car is a monster.
at 1:30 you can see the Porsche Cayenne, and the long test car the Cadillac CTSV Waggon
@nando8nando wats a better SUV?
HOLY CRAP!! That was Impressive! What do these M5's go for? 25K 30K It's worth it!
0 to 60 in 4.0s for a 5180 pound car is pretty damn good
you have good style
This is a bad ass SUV. WTF 60-0 in 106? Thats better braking then the CTS-V
I wouldn't buy it, but I wouldn't blame anyone for buying it.
very very beautiful car
i really like mercedez and bmw, really solid beautiful cars but i just wish they were more reliable. mercedez is less reliable than bmw and also feels like a tank or a boat, bmw have better response, but both are expensive for the reliability level. i like this suv because it looks sexy, high perfomance, but im sure its a gas guzzler not to mention the headache of fixing any repairs if needed.
@BigBoss13198 they are with the new m5
@radar3699 AMG has the SLS and SL black series
Whats the point, the cars have different labels for a reason:
Sedan - large single/family city car
Station wagon - city car for a wroking person or a mom
SUV - off road car with space
Van - family 6+ person car
Its like me going out to a dealership to buy a van because i wanna speed, same with the x6m, who wants a fast suv crossover...?
suspension geometry has advanced to the point that even 5000lbs cars can hang with m3's.....unbelievable
Give me one reason to have this over an M5 Touring.
@nando8nando How does it suck?
is it jsut me, or does it seem wrong this has more HP than an audi r8 v10? i mean shouldnt a supercar be able to beat an suv.
I'm buying this
@WTFGUY956 This isnt meant for off-roading.
I Love my X6M,, Its very unique! and you don't see any of them on the street..
Get an srt8 jeep and supercharge it and exhaust if you can't afford this, or if you dont like that sound, you can can never go wrong with full exhaust on american v8s.
4 seconds to 60 is quick. tune it for more boost and get in the 3's
as an m3 owner i would rather buy the amg. M division screwed up by slapping an m badge on almost every single chassis. can you say desperate?
It looks nice and whatever, and is pretty fast, but for me there really isn't a point in starting with an SUV when you're making a performance vehicle. Having a high center of gravity and something that performs terrible off road is useless. It's not a trophy truck by any stretch, it'd be a terrible race car, and it would never work for serious off roading. On top of all those things, SUV's are really heavy. It's basically putting all of your effort and resources into a bad initial idea.
@Cramos2174 --I dont want to argue with someone who have the mentality of 13yr old kid.
Hate it or love it
It is called the X sick M!
I'd get one.
@CalebRulez2 the M division is way better. AMG just stick a huge engine in there cars and dont change much where the M division change almost everything... thats why there are more AMG models than M models. because it takes waaaaaaaay longer to create an M model than an AMG model.
Do an off-road test.
@WTFGUY956 it's not an offroader
@Mzee1084 so true, we are a materialistic country!!!
why didnt BMW put that engine in the M5??
@AhmedAltima08 its nicer than what u drive probably
Madness!! 5k lbs and can do 0-60 4seconds!? Wow... Even more impressive is the 60-0.... Geezzz just don't see the use of a performance SUV...
@blackseries99 Mom jokes? AMG image? = Mercedes fan kid. Hahahahaha
@TheVasquez112 yeah? cadillac cts-v wagon, costs less and is faster. If you want to go cheap there is the subaru wrx sti premium and the list does on. You cant really justify this car, horrible fuel efficiency, not a lot of room, not very fast, and not nice to look at. It does a lot, but it doesn't do any of it well.
For $90k you can afford a decent SUV and a fast sports car. This is for people who have too much money than they know what to do with.
I can't wait to see this engine in a more deserving car (M5).
But I am going to miss that V10.
Its kind of funny but this only seats 4 and the M5 seats 5? Ok
:(
@rojm Expensive!
0-60 in 4 seconds. Crazy 1/4 mile. now I ask...why? no club would let you Autocross or road race this thing without signing a 10 page liability waiver...
I think this should be called the X6 Sport, not the X6M.
It's not ok that this car weighs 1,000 lbs. more than my body-on-frame 1998 Mercury Mountaineer with AWD when they're basically the same size. I don't care if there's more technology in this thing and more metal for crash-worthiness. That all shouldn't add a half-ton to a car's weight. Also this is a modern, more efficient, premium drinking, lower-displacement motor, with a significantly better power to weight ratio than my Mountaineer and yet they get the same gas mileage. That's pathetic.
proof that money does not = taste
4.0 sec to 60mph. Wow.
MY BABY
this is an odd thing...
i prefer the x5 or x1
And the point of this car is..?
Nor to 60 is in 4.7 secs! not 4secs
Lets create an SUV that can't haul, go off road or even snow, with minimal space in the cargo area, no head room and the most ugly exterior we can come up with. Next , lets create a 3 series convertible soft top that wont open.
Screw the M division for making this car!
there is a video of one doing 200mph on my channel
4th?
Only 2 and a half years late
so who's gonna race this thing? It's an suv.......SAV
BMW joined the the "automakers that make pointless cars" club
i highly doubt this thing does 0-60 in 4 seconds flat
just in time for $5 a gallon of gas. well I guess rich people don't care about gas price anyway.
SUVs shouldn't be high performance like this. They should be based on practicality. Get a sports car or supercar if you want performance. What a stupid vehicle. And I love BMW and an M3 is one of my favorite cars.
Bimmer, son I am disappoint
the x6 is already pointless, and its now getting more so in M
@blackseries99 A bike isn't faster than a RWD 4.0 V8.
LOL
It's not a SUV, it's an SAC.
For douche bags: Sports Activity Coupe.
.........um i think this video is a little late
meh, just pointless. I just cant wait for them to come up with the new M5, that will be something out of this planet (i hope)
no I don't have to admit anything
Bmw x6 radio o non
look like the aztek
More like coupe-u-v.
it only gets these numbers because its a car raised and the shape is exactly like a car but only like 2 inches taller in body hieght.. sad excuse for a suv
This is not a SUV.
Some sort of suv but it looks ugly for a BMW design.