Why Liverpool Are Buying Another Football Club |
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 кві 2024
- Welcome to The Athletic FC's UA-cam channel, where best-in-class journalism meets video.
Liverpool's owners are looking at buying another football club - so what lessons can they learn from Chelsea and Man City?
Let's find out 🤝
#chelsea #footballshorts #championsleague
------------
Try The Athletic for FREE for 30 days: theathletic.com/checkout2/int...
🎧 Listen to the 10 minute Daily Football Briefing here: podfollow.com/1677588464/view
Follow The Athletic FC:
Twitter: / theathleticfc
Facebook: / theathleticfc
Instagram: / theathleticfc
TikTok: / theathleticfc
Listen to The Atheltic Football Podcast:
Apple Podcasts: bit.ly/TAFPod
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/69AAB4o...
------------
Music sourced from Epidemic Sound
Additional footage sourced from AP Newsroom - Спорт
They should buy the Liverpool in Uruguay
the english colonising again
Then there’s going to be a Liverpool-city rivalry there as well
Was thinking the same haha
Man city acquired a club with a small fan base.... twice 😂
🤡
They have like 10 clubs
The City Football Group actually has full or partial ownership of 13 football clubs, in Europe, the Americas, Asia and Australia.
@@kurtsudheim825 he's referring to city having a small fan base
@@James-st9uu banter 🤣👍
It's disgusting really isn't it. The monopoly the rich football club owners have compared to the 2 bedroom semis we as fans rent or own if we are lucky.
That's one thing, should be outright illegal in short to have 1 club on another, where the fairness
It’s the game that’s played and written by Red Bull. Now City uses multi club models to pump and inflate sponsorships, Chelsea and now Liverpool owners are trying to jump in.
Fundamentally believe that you should not be allowed to own multiple football clubs, we should be against monopolies of any kind and this is just another showing that football has become about the money and business, not the fans
Good should 100% be illegal in sport. Creating monopolies in bisiness is bad, how is there any semblance of competitive fairness when you have 2 teams that are joined at the hip
They barely spend money on Liverpool
I don't like to hear that City work well. Yes, Girona is 3rd in LaLiga. However look at where are the other clubs. Look at Troyes who were used to play between the Ligue 1 and the Ligue 2 and who are currently in a position where they could be relegated.
The reason of that is the case of Savio. Indeed, he is currently loaned at Girona from Troyes and will join Man City next season the thing is that Troyes paid 15 millions euros for a player who never played for them and could not recruit players when they would have needed to. Next year, they may receive a certain fee from the selling of Savio but they will still be in the third division of french football which is only a semi professionnal league. They will have a lot of financial difficulties due to their standing.
So please don't talk of City Football Group just like a well working project because this is not the case.
blud what? “One club is doing bad” doesn’t make negate the legitimate successes of the project
🤡
But Mumbai City Fc is 2nd in the league
( Worst league)
Melbourne won while under city,new York fc won while under city,yokohama won while under city,girona gained promotion while under city,bahia gained promotion while under city,palermo and lomel sk are about to be promoted while under city,,,let's forget all that and just look at troyes,,okay.
Weren't troyes in ligue 1 last season?
Hey look, no answers whatsoever, again
That's how they sell their athletic subscriptions 😂 I don't know why I bother watching these anymore, always the same!
This guy speaks differently now he’s with the athletic
And if Liverpool buy players from them it will be good business.
Huge conflict of business too and will get you fined as there’s rules against it. As then they could low ball prices get scouting info of others teams budgets based off the offers players get. So yeah it’s not a good look at all.
It would be insider trading effectively
I was being sarcastic
@@PlumpsHubris youre smoking rocks redbull does it all the time.
@@drumagus2258 never said theyre innocent.
Wait did i see vitoria's crest? Bro good luck with that
It would be good to buy in Brazil, like this the league can grow.
Crazy how it's only a problem when we do it 💀
Who do you think there will buy
I didn’t know Everton were investors
Football is the mirror of capitalism, first the domestic monopoly then the international monopoly.
Fun fact: Man City's owners acquired a club in England with a small fan base.
Bro said copy and paste from FD
As an American, so explains why the Penguins and Red Sox aren't doing so well. John Henry is using that money to buy another team.
All fans of FSG teams are under the illusion that John Henry is spending the money on a different team. He isn't. He just doesn't like to spend much on his teams in general.
@@eX1st4132 I know, I wrote that partially in jest. That's why Mookie Betts got traded to LA. We all know John Henry would never have paid what the Dodgers did.
@@uncreative5766 True. I also haven't been keeping up with the Red Sox so closely for a couple years because I got rid of my cable subscription. I started paying attention again, and basically all the players from the last time we won the World Series were gone, so I wasn't too familiar.
India🤞🏻
please buy Marseille we need money
Sorry to burst your bubble but that would never happen. There is no reason for Liverpool to buy a club worth almost 300 million which has as much debt as Marseille do and with as high of a wage bill as Marseille have. It'd ruin their FFP record. It'd be well over 300 million which could be used by Liverpool to buy new players or improve facilities and coaching staff.
If they do buy a French club it'd probably be a lower table Ligue 1 side or a Ligue 2 side. It'd be a club with a low valuation with a small amount of debt and a low wage bill so that the players that will be replaced with Liverpool loanees won't be costing Liverpool too much if they fail to sell them or agree fair terms for release.
4th comment