Do you folks at Oxford know how Bitcoin works? If this ass wants to prove his claim, he can do so for about around a few pennies. Move a Satoshi from the Genesis block...that's it, that's all. He won't because he can't.
he should show his adresses to his enemies...so blockstream can have a twitter poll to determined he stole his BTC and those addresses can be blocked...and i would not be keen to be visited by cia...
Can't decide who is more ridiculous - Craig for faking or Jimmy for believing in him! Also, OXford - i thought you people were supposed to be smart???? why give this guy a platform?
A K You need to really watch from the 40 minute mark when he does the Q/A This video isn't just about giving him a platform it's also about making him look like a fool
nearly as smart as people from the USA who think satoshi is a yank...who has a soft spot for the London times...and surely a US citizen would quote new york times...or a similar west coast news rag....
That was awkward and uncomfortable. Craig Wright is all over the place. Verbal communicative ADHD maybe? He can’t give a focused response to a specific question ever. At least he’s being more transparent (intentionally or not) with the fact that his “vision” is to preserve the established status quo and the long standing rule of law and presumably control structure of the monetary elites. He as much as admits that his vision is basically a globally reaching, omnipotent and omnipresent digital version of the exact same world we are currently living in. He’s not a very good communicator and while I don’t really like him nor believe that he is the creator of bitcoin I do try to listen to this camp as I believe it is important to sincerely consider every perspective on the direction we journey ahead with on this new frontier as it has incredible consequences. While I lean more on the side of decentralization and individual liberties and sovereignty combined with a very limited governance it’s definitely worth pondering whether we really want to go away from the “western culture” and rule of law that we have established over such a long period of time. And then there is the fact that it’s not likely at all that we actually do inherit a new world free from financial and government tyranny as the current elite are not likely to sit idly by and let it happen and we don’t REALLY know or have any control over where all this crypto/digital shit is coming from and certainly not where it’s headed. I for one think one of the wisest things a person could do right now is learn about, prepare and establish an anonymous presence in the digital world and familiarize yourself with how to operate anonymously in a world of complete transparency and surveillance. A world where your every action (or keystroke) whether in the physical realm or the digital, is perfectly reviewable by at least one single entity and potentially even by any and everyone who wants to. Then again, we could just have a global war that sends us all back to the Stone Age. If we had worked on ourselves as human beings and a species wide community as much as we have worked on technological development and economic growth and thus were generally a more enlightened and ascended people we could begin creating a sustainable utopia right now where none suffer due to unnatural causes and all live with abundance and purpose. For some strange reason I just don’t think that future is something we are going to allow ourselves to have.. It’s a real shame.
I believe CSW is Satoshi as he claims. But, I also believe the vision of total surveillance and pre-crime monitoring that he gives in this video is extremely disturbing. Wright is clearly the original Bitcoin maximalist. He is a true believer. That being said, his dream will never come true. One ledger to rule the world, one ledger to find them, one ledger to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them.
I do think CSW is Satoshi otherwise he wouldn't want to go to court and prove it. so he must have solid evidence. the decentralization and liberetian is just a lie. I we saw what happened during the unregulated ICO boom in 2017-18 that all these youtubers and shitcoins CEOs were trying to rub people to buy their coins and then dumped on them. they want the government go away so they can rub people easier. If craig was a fraud and wanted to get rich, wouldn't be easier for him back in 2015 to just make a coin like litecoin or etherium or eos?
Navid Dadkhah I understand your dislike of fraud and people being taken for a loss so some fraudsters can get rich quick. Personally though I believe with conviction that a free market better filters out fraud than regulation. Let me explain. So crypto ico’s are a perfect example; brand new, completely free from regulations and controls and yes naturally unfortunately a new and unknown market is rife with fraud as consumers are unaware. The ICO’s are a perfect example of this. But as a result, government does their job and prosecutes as many fraudsters as possible and puts them in jail and people become far more careful and do their due diligence in the future. Those 2 factors alone are what eliminates the fraud. It’s sad that some people will take a hit but you have to be allowed to fail in order to learn and grow. The alternative is to have regulations which are always overreaching and will eliminate competition and ensure that a few monopolies control the market and we end up with a couple dominating corporations, and 1% of people reaping all the financial rewards while 99% have no opportunity to benefit nor compete as they will be swallowed up by the government backed monopolies. And even if the regulation comes, what is it that makes you think there will no longer be fraud? Fraud is naturally against the law so anyone participating in a fraudulent enterprise wouldn’t concern themselves with laws and regulations anyways. Just like how criminals don’t buy licensed firearms. They are criminals. The only people who adhere to regulations are law abiding, honest citizens and they are the ones who lose in the end because of it. Lastly, I do NOT believe that the spirit in which bitcoin was created is one of government regulations and corporate monopolies but rather one of freedom, liberty, free markets, non government intervention, sovereignty over ones own money and property and don’t forget the right to privacy and the ability to participate in unregulated marketplaces with anonymity. If that wasn’t the point of bitcoin then what is? We already have digital transactions.
Craig schooled Oxford. "You're all privileged". This is the funniest and best CSW event I've ever seen. Craig owned and triggered them all with the truth, the truth about what's the real Bitcoin, the truth about law, and the truth about society. Hats off to Satoshi Nakamoto, the genius of Craig Steven Wright.
Why did Satoshi become a scammer and forget how to sign with his private keys? Why won't he just admit that he forgot how to use bitcoin instead of providing dozens of fake proofs?
@@antoz8229 Brag about it after he does it. He has already faked signing it multiple times. If he just keeps trying different ways to fake it maybe one day he'll fool more than a few people. Anybody could prove it like that.
1TB blocks? every 10 minutes??... 144 TB/day... 1 Petabyte a week.... I'm not sure how many node operator will continue to persist the blockchain at that cost. Miners secure the blockchain's future (w/ competitive fee market). Nodes secure the blockchain's past (w/ longest chain). If the cost of running a node (verifying miners are producing valid blocks) increases, causing node operators shutdown, the single node/group/miner that remains has the ability to rewrite the past, thus has total control of the network.
@ ɃoilerRoom I agree. Just how is the average person going to keep the chain on their personal pc to run a node if blocks are 1tb, that's insane. Most peoples HDD space is gone in an hour. I think it will make btc sv really centralised, only big data storage providers could do this and for how long? If it comes to environmental issues consider the energy but with this consider the mining that would be needed to make all these new hdd's. It doesn't seem practice or logical. Someone prove me wrong and I will consider it, but at this time I don't see it.
BitCoin is supposed to scale massively. We're talking Google level datacenters, world wide, running nodes just like Satoshi claimed in the whitepaper. Look at Craig's claims for EDI. Massively cheaper and magnitudes more efficient with giant BitCoin blocks. When we have massive corporations running BitCoin for their own database purposes, and EDI (which is legally required for them to run) we'll have a massive blockchain decentralized by massive entities. Nobody cares about hobby raspberry Pi nodes. Not what Satoshi had in mind.
@@wrongthink1212 reread what I stated about EDI. Large blocks (of which nChain and CoinGeek are the only ones to invest into scaling for massive worldwide use) will be largely attractive to any large corp. The cost of storing data on servers will be so much more cheaper and secure years down the road, when blocks are uncapped. Literally no other coin can scale and hold use cases like BitCoin. Satoshi Vision is just a ticker name, based on what Satoshi saw for the future of Blockchain and utilization. The coin is BitCoin, and I don't care what exchanges call it, since they will all crumble in due time. If you care nothing about adoption but just price/ticker names, you don't get it. Have a nice life.
#BSV is the real BITCOIN! This Craig dude was misunderstood - super genius! Ruling will come in as BSV is the real BITCOIN and BlackRock has open - ETF (where tech meets needs)
The only people who are actually FRAUDS are people who accuse Craig of being a fraud. There is absolutely nothing fraudulent about original Bitcoin and BSV that maintains it, BSV is literally THE BEST WORKING BLOCKCHAIN there is by great margin, so anyone that wants to keep calling BSV a scam is outright completely ignorant or frauds themselves, as only ignorant people can not see this, or if they do yet they still continue with such narrative, can only be frauds themselves. Of the thousands of actual frauds with all the shitcoins and tokens who never achieved anything other than making their creators and few traders richer, BSV and Craig have never defrauded anyone, BSV is actually the only blockchian that scales, build for the global use, and Craig has never taken a cent from anyone, unlike the thousands of ICO creators who stole hundreds of millions from unaware (and stupid/greedy) so called "investors". PS: your username is cunt400 for a reason... it suits you perfectly.... and I bet your account is one of the many FAKE accounts created to mislead people the way MSM do it, by repeating the same lies over and over, till the people believe them. Shame on you asshole.
@@visualintent BSV will do what Bitcoin was created to do, and you will be crawling back saying how you were stupid and couldn't see the obvious, you are still just trolling and clueless. I wonder, why did you subscribe to my channel if you think BSV is such shit? I think you know what is going on already, you just didn't get to admit it yet.
@@-ED- No, even worse. they will be crawling back denying they were ever against it. It will be the following narrative by 99% of them ; I always knew Craig is Satoshi, I always knew SV is the real Bitcoin bla bla bla.. the only difference is that they will pay much higher price to be a part of it.
LOL! The narrative was he stormed out after being questioned by the audience about the wired article. The truth is, he didn't walk out and fake news was created by the same people again. Yes, an example of the fake evidence he described during the talk, was created about this talk. Thanks for posting this.
In this link on reddit Craig admits he created those fake blog posts to "throw wired" Now he forgets and lies and calls it fake news and you believe him. np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6xkn24/bcc_bch_are_bitcoin_they_follow_the_whitepaper/dmjcyou/?context=3
@@frodobaggins7469 actually I'm 43 from California and my name is Christopher Soper. www.google.com/search?q=who+is+Christopher+Soper+to+bitcoin&oq=who+i&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j69i59l3.4594j0j4&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
The fact that you are giving these people oxygen decreases your legitimacy. And by the way: who the hell would run a node that generates 1 tb of data every 10 minutes? Are you crazy? That chain, at best, would be extremely centralized. That's not innovative. That's the opposite of satoshi's vision. Craig, if you're satoshi, it is very easy to prove it. Send 0.00000001 BTC from Satoshi's wallet to another address - ANY address. Do that, and we'll all shut up. If you can't do that, you should stop claiming to be Satoshi, because anyone who knows anything knows that that's a lie.
Through many awkward moments, there are some glimpses of a genius mind. Great job OxfordUnion team for inviting such a controversial figure (at least at this point in time) and post the talk on UA-cam. Sooner or later, the truth will come out. But, right now, what matters the most is you respecting your core values and allowing freedom of speech. Thank you.
If I was Satoshi Nakamoto and had a million bitcoins worth ££🤑billions and I didn’t believe in bitcoin because “the block is too small”any more I would sell my bitcoin .simple he is not Satoshi it’s my mum who won’t buy me a f#;kin bike for Christmas 🎄
During the BCH/BSV fork I remember him openly threatening that he intended to destroy both BTC and BCH in a timely manner. Oh how the narrative changes. Craig is a very nasty and vindictive individual.
I read it in his tweets during the fork. His threat was that he was going to crash the price of both BTC and BCH. He is a very vindictive and nasty individual.
Observe the pattern. All negative comments come from accounts registered this week, with zero followers and zero previous comments. It's like the freaking resurrection day
@@turbokike7396 you have nothing on your channel, you even hide date of when you created the channel, which to me sounds like you are a fake account, a sock puppet account, so you fit right in into his description.... which makes him correct, and you a troll.
The question is answered. It is just not what the kid wanted to hear. The point of bitcoin idea is to keep an immutable ledger for accounting (aka history). Using the mutable internet archive to attack the founder of bitcoin is a clear indicator that Oxford kids are losing their IQ points.
Lol. Hilarious. At least he didn't go into full on sweary rage mode (as is often the case when he's put on the back foot) after the interesting conversation at 44:35 Wright is spouting more of his nonsense. The page IS saved for everyone to see. The snapshot of CSW's own Blogspot webpage entry that he originally created on Tuesday, 26th August 2008 and was archived (before Wright had made any claim to be Satoshi) on 2nd June 2014 contained the line: "Tomorrow - back to the DNS paper, my statistics dissertation and work.". When a snapshot of the same page was taken on 25th May 2015 the text had been edited in the interim to read: "Tomorrow - back to the DNS paper, my statistics dissertation and work. *I have a cryptocurrency paper out soon. Twenty years. Triple entry book keeping. BDO was good for something.*" It isn't some nefarious, untrustworthy website that has archived the page as Craig implies. It's the Internet Archive - "a non-profit library of millions of free books, movies, software, music, websites, and more." It is a trusted and credible source of seeing a webpage as it was on a particular date. Notice during the question from the audience member (which was calmly and softly presented) how Craig's body language becomes defensive, and then he stands up, raises his voice and starts deflecting at that point talking about emails and other nonsense completely not related to the question. At 48:00 he starts to get agitated and Jimmy tries to cover the cracks before Craig loses it at 48:58. More ranting about PDFs, when the question was about Wright's own personal Blogspot website! 50:25 ahh, there's the swearing! Craig S Wright publicly claimed to be Satoshi on 2nd May 2016 (BBC News) following investigations by Gizmodo and Wired in December 2015 (both after the website had been edited sometime between June 2014 and May 2015) Seeing as Mr Wright subsequently deleted his site from the Blogspot platform (which was archived by The Wayback Machine), perhaps anyone facing him in court should ask Google for any archived backups of the Blogspot website user data, including all of the revision data? Oh, he also had other Blogspot sites too. Wink, wink. ;) EDIT: (haha!) CSW's "former lawyer" buddy stated at 47:51 that The Wayback Machine isn't admissible as evidence. He said, "Courts of Law don't accept Wayback Machine printouts as reliable evidence of what a website may or may not have looked like in the past because they're not entirely reliable". Erm.. WRONG! Look up UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS - MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD., Plaintiff, v. PLATTFORM ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Case No. 14-2464-JWL The defendant tried to argue that the Internet Archive's pages weren't admissible because the Wayback Machine doesn't capture everything on the page or update every page from a website on the same date. The judge, after receiving testimony from an Internet Archive employee, disagreed. He found the site to a credible source of preserved evidence -- not just because it captures (for the most part) sites as they were on relevant dates but, more importantly, it does nothing to alter the purity of the preserved evidence.
And it's important to note that Wired (and Gizmodo) definitely DID reference the doctored pages of Wright's own 2008 blogspot blog post in their investigative article despite Craig denying it in this video where he insisted their claims were based only of faked emails. I quote 'An August 2008 post on Wright’s blog, months before the November 2008 introduction of the bitcoin whitepaper on a cryptography mailing list. It mentions his intention to release a "cryptocurrency paper," and references "triple entry accounting," ' This Wired's 2015 article goes on.. Dropping Breadcrumbs? Despite that overwhelming collection of clues, none of it fully proves that Wright is Nakamoto. All of it could be an elaborate hoax-perhaps orchestrated by Wright himself. The unverified leaked documents could be faked in whole or in part. And most inexplicably of all, comparisons of different archived versions of the three smoking gun posts from Wright’s blog show that he did edit all three-to insert evidence of his bitcoin history. The PGP key associated with Nakamoto’s email address and references to an upcoming "cryptocurrency paper" and "triple entry accounting" were added sometime after 2013. Even the post noting bitcoin’s beta launch is questionable. While it was ostensibly posted in January 2009, it later seems to have been deleted and then undeleted-or possibly even written for the first time-sometime between October 2013 and June of 2014.
@@spiritusinfinitus he knows all these things and he also knows that other people know these things, yet he's going to court and at minute 49:00 he says "you know maximum penalty in this country for perjury? 20 years ...". so I think he has stronger evidence for his claim that would cancel these allegations. I'm saying 100 percent he's satoshi but I think interesting to watch what's going on and how it unfolds.
@@naviddadkhah4485 If that's the case then why does he and Jimmy need to outright lie about the Wayback Machine page that was referenced here by the member of the audience, and why do they state that it's not credible evidence that is accepted by the courts when clearly it is, as a quick search of previous court records demonstrates?
It's very sad that this religious-like hoax has come out of the crypto space. He even speaks like if he were a messiah. His thoughts are the very opposite of what Bitcoin stands for.
This guy is such a liar. The reason for "gold-backing" claim of anything is specifically meant to sucker people into using your worthless paper as "money" instead of gold.
@Darren Kis :) coming from someone that still delivers leaflets (nowadays, in a digital marketing era), you're the perfect example of how much business acumen the BTC proponents have
You have no idea ladies and gentlemen. I am going to tell you right now that whatever you perceive to be the state of the art blockchain technology, any blockchain technology, in secret ladies and gentlemen Craig Wright is at least a very bare minimum fifty to a hundred years ahead beyond what you can even imagine.
WTF? Guys a scam artist and you people are falling for it. Look into the Wiki history of Craig Wright, and see how he went back and changed a webpage then claimmed to be "Satoshi Nakomoto". Data showes when he did it. Guy cannot move one satoshi from a "Satoshi" wallet. People check this guy out before you invest in BitcoinSV, or he will be flying off with your money and leave you holding the bag. I gotta respect his come back plan thou, nobody saw that comming. But buying the "Copyrights" to the whitpapers of an "Open Source" project does not make you it's developer.
@Shadow Banned Which of Craigs many fake proof convinced you that he is Satoshi? All of you fake Craig fans talk about "do your research" but none of you can tell us what your research found that convinced you. Maybe you found some money in your bank account or you are just a fake botnet account.
Read a lot of satoshis old comments from back when he was posting. I think CW might have hired the real satoshi to research a project like bitcoin. That guy released it captured the priv keys of the satoshi stash and destroyed them. CW can win in court that it was his funding that created the bitcoin paper and it is his property and he is listed as the creator. Real nakamoto probably died or is being tortured indefinitely for the priv keys to the stash that he probably terminated. Who knows but CW doesn't say he wrote tons of code and worked tirelessly with others to create the algorithm. But he demands that the name of satoshi is rightly his in the eyes of the courts. In my opinion CW has difficulty putting together sentences let alone code 6k plus lines. We can only prove it with a signature from the original block that is the proof that CW avoids talking about like it doesn't matter. How could satoshi sit around and argue he is satoshi all day and not once and for all prove it with a transaction or signature. Unless he is faking it his actions do not makes sense if he were the real satoshi mastermind / creator behind bitcoin.
@@flagermusen How do you know that? If he is he have done an incredible job giving proof he isn't. I have to give him that if that's the case. Here's a good summery of all the evidence stacked against him: bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright But if you have any new evidence, would love to see that.
I don't even have to watch this through to realize it is "rat poison squared". Shame on whoever shares this, because all this person wants is media coverage and attention. If we simply turn our backs and don't even mention him anymore he will just fade away.
That doesnt really prove anything tho. If satoshis wallet get hacked.. does that mean the hacker is satoshi? No. Craig is obv. a fraud. But moving bitcoin is not proof
@@vester2196 well, I think that's exactly why he's going to court so people don't say he stole the keys. after that he'll sign. That's what I think going to happen.
@@naviddadkhah4485 He first need to prove he has the keys though. We'll see the 28th i guess. If he had the keys in the first place, he would have signed them by now, instead of writing long incoherent gibberish blog posts with filled with lies and no proof at all.
Hahahaha classic comment. Can't stop laughing. Especially because he takes his phone camera out too, probably saying to himself "so you wana take credit for my work do ya, let me just pass your mugshot on to the Yakuza byatch!"
I wounder how much Write paid for this debate. His media blitz for BitcoinSV is impressive, from 50$ to 200$ after being exposed as a fraud. You can debate crypto all you want but it's hear to stay. Goverments hate it, but it's the product of their economic abuse.
This is super unrelated and will probably never happen but can we quickly just take some time to appreciate how funny it would be if Tyler the creator was interviewed here.
She was hell bent on trying to make people equal. Like, nooooo. She is literally at Oxford, which most people can't afford, yet, she wants to be equal?! Equal to what?? Equal to us poor people? If so, give me her tuition money lol
You do realize that this guy is not me. www.google.com/search?q=who+is+Christopher+Soper+to+bitcoin&oq=who+i&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j69i59l3.4594j0j4&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
Any body can claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto but an extra ordinary claim requires an extraordinary evidence, I am not Craig Steven Wright, and he is me, I am Satoshi Nakamoto and my evidences are in the Genesis Block and in the timestamp, which I have embedded cryptographically.
Best thing he can do is give it a new name and improve technology - and disappear - his presence ego and all makes it unattractive investment - who cares if it’s called bitcoin. Who cares if he created it why he want that accolade - ? It would do a great service to crypto community if he just disappeared - work quietly in background. As most honest people do…So many coins are able start new with a new name. Improve the tech. It’s not usable at current moment. Maybe he should focus on usability instead of trying to bring btc down. Bitcoin is a store of value. That’s good enough - let’s create a new name and mission - not to destroy Btc .. that purpose is to harm millions of people. Instead just prove your tech and use case instead of forcing people to
When you compare craig rat ( on stage vocabulary to the Bitcoin white paper written vocabulary )its not even close. They dont speak the same language. not even close. This is very offensive, listening him speak Im waiting for the real Satoshi to come forward.
Craig rat , speaks so poorly towards his bitcoin creation. Craig rat is not believable, I will never believe Craig Rat created bitcoi n, untill he moves 2 tokens from the 1st bitcoin wallet (period).
Apparently Mr. Jimmy Nguyen has said my comment is not true. I have told the truth. He has now Whatsapped me and threatened to sue me if I continue to comment. He is still insisting that I should pay him R25,000 for him to pay me $54,000,000,000. I am not going to. I will continue to comment.
@@ryanxcharles his worldview is quite the contrast compared to the average crypto advocate. When you look at the world empirically, you can easily see which worldview has the least resistance towards their objective, I am not sure if that will be sufficient tho.
31:02 Why even answer this? like what is even the question here? This is obviously a situation where she's trying to corner him to say something stupid and he fell for it.
Th jimmy guy really dont understand the purpose of transactions.. we get the point of the blockchain system attatched to make safe Transactions, but setting the goal to perform in 5 billion lives doesnt really make sense. Bitcoin is at a rise at this moment, not even bitcoin cash can become a daily transacted currency. Why you may ask? Because bitcoin is too attracted to the interests and so on, which doesnt make it an stable currency.
The truth ? Check Bitcoins Hashpower vs Bitcoin SV, hell compare BitcoinCash to it. Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash are beating the hell out of SV atm. Nobody seems to want to mine it.
TSLA is currently worth more than the top five car makers combined. So what? That doesn't prove anything except that people are often irrational and ignorant.
Like him or hate him, you have to respect the fact Craig shares his true opinion regardless of the audience. Intellectual honesty is in short supply these days, crypto needs more people like him.
@Space Is the Place If he misunderstood the definition of equality than so did I! Am I wrong in understanding that there are two discrete forms of equality - equality in law (aka opportunity) and equality in outcome?
@@adamconnolly2899 Communists want to conflate the two, because their ideology rests on the principle of equality of outcome. Which is of course an absolutely insane and totally impossible concept.
And what if he's "Wright" lol, Jimmy is brilliant, the fact that everyone is against BSV stinks to me, so I'll take the bumps from BTC and buy BSV and let it there long term, I believe in it. What if BTC has no use but is merely a store of value? I think 50 BSV is preferable to 1 BTC. CW leaves a lot to be desired in his swearing but he is highly intelligent and anyone that underestimates that quality is not.
Jimmy said evidence from the wayback machine wont be accepted in courts of law but a quick search brings this up, so maybe he isn't so brilliant? www.theregister.co.uk/2018/09/04/wayback_machine_legit/
@@sharpvidtube Almost anything can be admissible as evidence, but that doesn't mean it can't be thrown out later if there's no chain of custody or a screenshot can't be authenticated.
@@sharpvidtube It is my understanding that : If you have the private key to the genesis block, you can change the code in it. Therefore you could change the block limit or you could turn it off. Is that not true?
I retract my original statement about the genesis block. I read about the development process on GitHub, changing the bitcoin network is extraordinarily difficult, also miners don’t have to accept changes, backward compatibility must be maintained as much as possible. Even a 50% attack is beyond the capabilities of almost any programming team. I honestly doubt that Satoshi is from this planet, those observing earth probably became concerned when they noticed that humans were disturbing the ecosystem of the earth by printing fiat to extract all the natural resources, so they provided a hard currency of fixed supply in hopes that earth people would use it and slow down. Hal Finley was not Satoshi nor is Craig Wright.
First time I hear/watch Craig. My impression: twisted logic, sychopath, and unconvincing. Now I will never believe such a man produce amazing crypto innovation, like BTC....
All he had to do was move a few sats and he could of silenced the trolls. As they annoy him so much, I can only think of one reason why he didn't do that. I also have to wonder why he teamed up with people like Roger Ver and Calvin Ayre? If I'm wrong, he's played a stupid game and has ruined his reputation anyway. He has a small cult following but most people don't want to have anything to do with BSV and its hard to see that changing. www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36213588
Sign a message with the private key or move some btc out of Satoshi's addresses. This is the only way somebody can claim is Satoshi. He nerver did it, so clearly he doesnt have any of Satoshi's keys.
He just doesn’t have the technicality or understanding of bitcoin or cryptography for that matter. He just talks a lot of fluff to fill in the gap but says a lot without saying anything. Satoshi was a cryptographer not a theologist. Also, how can he be completely oblivious to Nick Szabo and BitGold when there are so many similarities between Bitcoin and BitGold both in ideology and concept.
"Oh, it's just White males. Well, it's not. I'm sorry, Western culture isn't White males. *"Augustus" [sic, actually Augustine]* of Hippo was African. *"Sophio" [sic, actually Sappho]* of Lesbos was female. And people understand that her poems about women were by a woman. That's western culture. It isn't just a whole lot of guys in white for the last 50 years bloody *Harvard's been teaching us... [???????? they have? lmao]* "
![Blockchain vs. Bullshit: Thoughts on the Future of Money [Classic Bitcoin & Open Blockchain Talk]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SMEOKDVXlUo/mqdefault.jpg)
Litecoin is doing so well Craig Wright will soon be claiming he’s Charlie Lee.
😂
Says Alex Svanevik
Well with his Vietnamese adoption son that would make sense 😁
That's the funniest shit i've read all day. He'd probably let his bitch Nguyen claim he's Charlie Lee.
Pardon my curiosity but are you guys lefties?
Do you folks at Oxford know how Bitcoin works? If this ass wants to prove his claim, he can do so for about around a few pennies. Move a Satoshi from the Genesis block...that's it, that's all. He won't because he can't.
Jeff Foster I watched the entire thing waiting for this exact question and no one asked it. Wow.
LMAO 😂. FR tho
It’s not the time to move those pennies. The world is not prepared yet
he should show his adresses to his enemies...so blockstream can have a twitter poll to determined he stole his BTC and those addresses can be blocked...and i would not be keen to be visited by cia...
Can't decide who is more ridiculous - Craig for faking or Jimmy for believing in him! Also, OXford - i thought you people were supposed to be smart???? why give this guy a platform?
Money talks I guess. Still lame.
A K You need to really watch from the 40 minute mark when he does the Q/A This video isn't just about giving him a platform it's also about making him look like a fool
keep making questions, you wiil find you was wrong :)
@@jayzhang8214 you mean keep asking questions, you will find you were wrong :) english basics first then let's proceed
nearly as smart as people from the USA who think satoshi is a yank...who has a soft spot for the London times...and surely a US citizen would quote new york times...or a similar west coast news rag....
That was awkward and uncomfortable. Craig Wright is all over the place. Verbal communicative ADHD maybe? He can’t give a focused response to a specific question ever. At least he’s being more transparent (intentionally or not) with the fact that his “vision” is to preserve the established status quo and the long standing rule of law and presumably control structure of the monetary elites. He as much as admits that his vision is basically a globally reaching, omnipotent and omnipresent digital version of the exact same world we are currently living in. He’s not a very good communicator and while I don’t really like him nor believe that he is the creator of bitcoin I do try to listen to this camp as I believe it is important to sincerely consider every perspective on the direction we journey ahead with on this new frontier as it has incredible consequences. While I lean more on the side of decentralization and individual liberties and sovereignty combined with a very limited governance it’s definitely worth pondering whether we really want to go away from the “western culture” and rule of law that we have established over such a long period of time. And then there is the fact that it’s not likely at all that we actually do inherit a new world free from financial and government tyranny as the current elite are not likely to sit idly by and let it happen and we don’t REALLY know or have any control over where all this crypto/digital shit is coming from and certainly not where it’s headed. I for one think one of the wisest things a person could do right now is learn about, prepare and establish an anonymous presence in the digital world and familiarize yourself with how to operate anonymously in a world of complete transparency and surveillance. A world where your every action (or keystroke) whether in the physical realm or the digital, is perfectly reviewable by at least one single entity and potentially even by any and everyone who wants to. Then again, we could just have a global war that sends us all back to the Stone Age. If we had worked on ourselves as human beings and a species wide community as much as we have worked on technological development and economic growth and thus were generally a more enlightened and ascended people we could begin creating a sustainable utopia right now where none suffer due to unnatural causes and all live with abundance and purpose. For some strange reason I just don’t think that future is something we are going to allow ourselves to have.. It’s a real shame.
I believe CSW is Satoshi as he claims. But, I also believe the vision of total surveillance and pre-crime monitoring that he gives in this video is extremely disturbing. Wright is clearly the original Bitcoin maximalist. He is a true believer. That being said, his dream will never come true. One ledger to rule the world, one ledger to find them, one ledger to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them.
I do think CSW is Satoshi otherwise he wouldn't want to go to court and prove it. so he must have solid evidence. the decentralization and liberetian is just a lie. I we saw what happened during the unregulated ICO boom in 2017-18 that all these youtubers and shitcoins CEOs were trying to rub people to buy their coins and then dumped on them. they want the government go away so they can rub people easier.
If craig was a fraud and wanted to get rich, wouldn't be easier for him back in 2015 to just make a coin like litecoin or etherium or eos?
Navid Dadkhah I understand your dislike of fraud and people being taken for a loss so some fraudsters can get rich quick. Personally though I believe with conviction that a free market better filters out fraud than regulation. Let me explain. So crypto ico’s are a perfect example; brand new, completely free from regulations and controls and yes naturally unfortunately a new and unknown market is rife with fraud as consumers are unaware. The ICO’s are a perfect example of this. But as a result, government does their job and prosecutes as many fraudsters as possible and puts them in jail and people become far more careful and do their due diligence in the future. Those 2 factors alone are what eliminates the fraud. It’s sad that some people will take a hit but you have to be allowed to fail in order to learn and grow. The alternative is to have regulations which are always overreaching and will eliminate competition and ensure that a few monopolies control the market and we end up with a couple dominating corporations, and 1% of people reaping all the financial rewards while 99% have no opportunity to benefit nor compete as they will be swallowed up by the government backed monopolies. And even if the regulation comes, what is it that makes you think there will no longer be fraud? Fraud is naturally against the law so anyone participating in a fraudulent enterprise wouldn’t concern themselves with laws and regulations anyways. Just like how criminals don’t buy licensed firearms. They are criminals. The only people who adhere to regulations are law abiding, honest citizens and they are the ones who lose in the end because of it. Lastly, I do NOT believe that the spirit in which bitcoin was created is one of government regulations and corporate monopolies but rather one of freedom, liberty, free markets, non government intervention, sovereignty over ones own money and property and don’t forget the right to privacy and the ability to participate in unregulated marketplaces with anonymity. If that wasn’t the point of bitcoin then what is? We already have digital transactions.
Craig schooled Oxford. "You're all privileged". This is the funniest and best CSW event I've ever seen. Craig owned and triggered them all with the truth, the truth about what's the real Bitcoin, the truth about law, and the truth about society. Hats off to Satoshi Nakamoto, the genius of Craig Steven Wright.
He always owns the bitcoin argument but the haters never like to show his arguments they just scream scammer
Why did Satoshi become a scammer and forget how to sign with his private keys? Why won't he just admit that he forgot how to use bitcoin instead of providing dozens of fake proofs?
@@alexocasio-gomez5267 he will show private keys after court be patient little one
@@antoz8229 Brag about it after he does it. He has already faked signing it multiple times. If he just keeps trying different ways to fake it maybe one day he'll fool more than a few people. Anybody could prove it like that.
@@alexocasio-gomez5267 you obviously are just a puppet who actually hasn't studied any of CSW side. It's called CSW derangement syndrome
1TB blocks? every 10 minutes??... 144 TB/day... 1 Petabyte a week....
I'm not sure how many node operator will continue to persist the blockchain at that cost.
Miners secure the blockchain's future (w/ competitive fee market).
Nodes secure the blockchain's past (w/ longest chain).
If the cost of running a node (verifying miners are producing valid blocks) increases, causing node operators shutdown, the single node/group/miner that remains has the ability to rewrite the past, thus has total control of the network.
@
ɃoilerRoom I agree. Just how is the average person going to keep the chain on their personal pc to run a node if blocks are 1tb, that's insane. Most peoples HDD space is gone in an hour. I think it will make btc sv really centralised, only big data storage providers could do this and for how long? If it comes to environmental issues consider the energy but with this consider the mining that would be needed to make all these new hdd's. It doesn't seem practice or logical. Someone prove me wrong and I will consider it, but at this time I don't see it.
@@Torrnintwo centralized, right, exactly what Bitcoin should not be. These guys are trying to get rich, and doing well so far.
BitCoin is supposed to scale massively. We're talking Google level datacenters, world wide, running nodes just like Satoshi claimed in the whitepaper. Look at Craig's claims for EDI. Massively cheaper and magnitudes more efficient with giant BitCoin blocks. When we have massive corporations running BitCoin for their own database purposes, and EDI (which is legally required for them to run) we'll have a massive blockchain decentralized by massive entities. Nobody cares about hobby raspberry Pi nodes. Not what Satoshi had in mind.
@@shikari94 I don't see how large companies will want to be mining some shitcoin named 'Satoshis Vision' .... cringe...
@@wrongthink1212 reread what I stated about EDI. Large blocks (of which nChain and CoinGeek are the only ones to invest into scaling for massive worldwide use) will be largely attractive to any large corp. The cost of storing data on servers will be so much more cheaper and secure years down the road, when blocks are uncapped. Literally no other coin can scale and hold use cases like BitCoin. Satoshi Vision is just a ticker name, based on what Satoshi saw for the future of Blockchain and utilization. The coin is BitCoin, and I don't care what exchanges call it, since they will all crumble in due time.
If you care nothing about adoption but just price/ticker names, you don't get it.
Have a nice life.
#BSV is the real BITCOIN! This Craig dude was misunderstood - super genius! Ruling will come in as BSV is the real BITCOIN and BlackRock has open - ETF (where tech meets needs)
49:00 says it all
It's astonishing. It's like he thinks that saying it out loud makes it all okay? Not long to go now.
He is getting destroyed in court.
@@John-wf5if where? Not from what we are seeing from today.
I'm one of the very few who believes CSW = Satoshi. IMO he had a lot of help from David K. He's just not PC - it's an Aussie thing.
I'm an aussie and nah this isn't an aussie thing.
@@Tinfed I'm an Aussie and yeah it is
Lol the guy has asperges....being politely social able is not in his DNA..
to his credit he eluded to it in his talks.
What you're viewing here is what a completely centralized cryptocurrency looks like.
Wrong, protocol is set in stone, that's how it's decentralized.
@@DB-gf5gu Stop lying to people please, BSV is the most centralized of all the fake Bitcoins.
Why would you give a known FRAUD a platform like this? SAD!
Because he paid them A LOT. Money rules the world sadly. And faketoshi is rich as fuk
Still get roasted. I am glad, he’s there, so the world can see his fraudulent.
The only people who are actually FRAUDS are people who accuse Craig of being a fraud.
There is absolutely nothing fraudulent about original Bitcoin and BSV that maintains it, BSV is literally THE BEST WORKING BLOCKCHAIN there is by great margin, so anyone that wants to keep calling BSV a scam is outright completely ignorant or frauds themselves, as only ignorant people can not see this, or if they do yet they still continue with such narrative, can only be frauds themselves. Of the thousands of actual frauds with all the shitcoins and tokens who never achieved anything other than making their creators and few traders richer, BSV and Craig have never defrauded anyone, BSV is actually the only blockchian that scales, build for the global use, and Craig has never taken a cent from anyone, unlike the thousands of ICO creators who stole hundreds of millions from unaware (and stupid/greedy) so called "investors".
PS: your username is cunt400 for a reason... it suits you perfectly.... and I bet your account is one of the many FAKE accounts created to mislead people the way MSM do it, by repeating the same lies over and over, till the people believe them. Shame on you asshole.
Hahahahaha
@@-ED- crack is one hell of a drug
It's hard to accept the truth. Especially when it affects your bag.
Yes. The poor fools that invested in BSV.
@@visualintent BSV will do what Bitcoin was created to do, and you will be crawling back saying how you were stupid and couldn't see the obvious, you are still just trolling and clueless. I wonder, why did you subscribe to my channel if you think BSV is such shit? I think you know what is going on already, you just didn't get to admit it yet.
@@-ED- No, even worse. they will be crawling back denying they were ever against it. It will be the following narrative by 99% of them ; I always knew Craig is Satoshi, I always knew SV is the real Bitcoin bla bla bla.. the only difference is that they will pay much higher price to be a part of it.
This video will be a great meme in a view years. Bitcoooonnect
@@antonnym563 you are stupid also.
LOL! The narrative was he stormed out after being questioned by the audience about the wired article. The truth is, he didn't walk out and fake news was created by the same people again. Yes, an example of the fake evidence he described during the talk, was created about this talk. Thanks for posting this.
haha, yes, exactly
In this link on reddit Craig admits he created those fake blog posts to "throw wired"
Now he forgets and lies and calls it fake news and you believe him.
np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6xkn24/bcc_bch_are_bitcoin_they_follow_the_whitepaper/dmjcyou/?context=3
Hard to watch Faketoshi go off on one and start talking gibberish. I feel sorry for the man. Very sad to watch.
I feel repulsed and disgusted by him myself
@@W0RLDP34CE +1
He is satoshi, you just bashed the creator of bitcoin, the most revolutionary technology since the internet.
www.google.com/search?q=who+is+Christopher+Soper+to+bitcoin&oq=who+i&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j69i59l3.4594j0j4&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
@@frodobaggins7469 actually I'm 43 from California and my name is Christopher Soper. www.google.com/search?q=who+is+Christopher+Soper+to+bitcoin&oq=who+i&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j69i59l3.4594j0j4&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
The fact that you are giving these people oxygen decreases your legitimacy. And by the way: who the hell would run a node that generates 1 tb of data every 10 minutes? Are you crazy? That chain, at best, would be extremely centralized. That's not innovative. That's the opposite of satoshi's vision.
Craig, if you're satoshi, it is very easy to prove it. Send 0.00000001 BTC from Satoshi's wallet to another address - ANY address. Do that, and we'll all shut up. If you can't do that, you should stop claiming to be Satoshi, because anyone who knows anything knows that that's a lie.
just wait a year
@helloWorld he doesn't have to do anything. But until he proves his assertion, I (and others) will continue to point out that he's full of it.
Through many awkward moments, there are some glimpses of a genius mind. Great job OxfordUnion team for inviting such a controversial figure (at least at this point in time) and post the talk on UA-cam. Sooner or later, the truth will come out. But, right now, what matters the most is you respecting your core values and allowing freedom of speech. Thank you.
Well said!
That's why I love Oxford
true
dude, he paid his way to be there, lol. they didnt invite him.
This has to be the most thoughtful comment in here
Faketoshi
If I was Satoshi Nakamoto and had a million bitcoins worth ££🤑billions and I didn’t believe in bitcoin because “the block is too small”any more I would sell my bitcoin .simple he is not Satoshi it’s my mum who won’t buy me a f#;kin bike for Christmas 🎄
@Silver Crypto you mean it's too hard for Satoshi Nakamoto to sell one or 0.00000001 btc. It's not hard he invented it
During the BCH/BSV fork I remember him openly threatening that he intended to destroy both BTC and BCH in a timely manner. Oh how the narrative changes.
Craig is a very nasty and vindictive individual.
I read it in his tweets during the fork. His threat was that he was going to crash the price of both BTC and BCH.
He is a very vindictive and nasty individual.
@@Skinski7 Just spreadig fear. So people buy into his little scam coin.
@@runabath Privacy would be so neat now.
Observe the pattern. All negative comments come from accounts registered this week, with zero followers and zero previous comments. It's like the freaking resurrection day
Rudi cassidy but but muh tRuTh
@@jamrollz get a life
you're right, your channel is pretty clean, only one video of how to draw a croquis, you basket weave by any chance ?
@@turbokike7396 you have nothing on your channel, you even hide date of when you created the channel, which to me sounds like you are a fake account, a sock puppet account, so you fit right in into his description.... which makes him correct, and you a troll.
-ED- Bitcoin SV Channel -> a fork of a fork of Bitcoin Cash ABC. So your true name name is Bitcoin Cash SV 🤣
51:37 "I think that answers my question." 10/10
Name calling is his only defence
The question is answered. It is just not what the kid wanted to hear.
The point of bitcoin idea is to keep an immutable ledger for accounting (aka history). Using the mutable internet archive to attack the founder of bitcoin is a clear indicator that Oxford kids are losing their IQ points.
@@wangniwei "The kid" was pretty satisfied with the answer. You must click in the wrong timestamp.
"Kid" made one mistake. I'll say what mistake after COPA.
Epic rant about altered docs, court, code is law, SJWs, the decline of Western culture and the myth of equality starts around 45:00
You can tell which guy in the audience reads Twitter.
Everyone. Except the first question.
I'm all in on BSV but how does CSW prove things in court if the courts and law don't understand bitcoin etc?
You're on one hahah....i love it
@@antoz8229 They can perfectly understand. Only the snake oil salesmen in crypto would like you to believe only THEY can understand.
Ryan, tell us MOAR
Lol. Hilarious. At least he didn't go into full on sweary rage mode (as is often the case when he's put on the back foot) after the interesting conversation at 44:35
Wright is spouting more of his nonsense. The page IS saved for everyone to see. The snapshot of CSW's own Blogspot webpage entry that he originally created on Tuesday, 26th August 2008 and was archived (before Wright had made any claim to be Satoshi) on 2nd June 2014 contained the line:
"Tomorrow - back to the DNS paper, my statistics dissertation and work.".
When a snapshot of the same page was taken on 25th May 2015 the text had been edited in the interim to read:
"Tomorrow - back to the DNS paper, my statistics dissertation and work. *I have a cryptocurrency paper out soon. Twenty years. Triple entry book keeping. BDO was good for something.*"
It isn't some nefarious, untrustworthy website that has archived the page as Craig implies. It's the Internet Archive - "a non-profit library of millions of free books, movies, software, music, websites, and more." It is a trusted and credible source of seeing a webpage as it was on a particular date.
Notice during the question from the audience member (which was calmly and softly presented) how Craig's body language becomes defensive, and then he stands up, raises his voice and starts deflecting at that point talking about emails and other nonsense completely not related to the question. At 48:00 he starts to get agitated and Jimmy tries to cover the cracks before Craig loses it at 48:58. More ranting about PDFs, when the question was about Wright's own personal Blogspot website! 50:25 ahh, there's the swearing!
Craig S Wright publicly claimed to be Satoshi on 2nd May 2016 (BBC News) following investigations by Gizmodo and Wired in December 2015 (both after the website had been edited sometime between June 2014 and May 2015)
Seeing as Mr Wright subsequently deleted his site from the Blogspot platform (which was archived by The Wayback Machine), perhaps anyone facing him in court should ask Google for any archived backups of the Blogspot website user data, including all of the revision data? Oh, he also had other Blogspot sites too. Wink, wink. ;)
EDIT: (haha!)
CSW's "former lawyer" buddy stated at 47:51 that The Wayback Machine isn't admissible as evidence. He said, "Courts of Law don't accept Wayback Machine printouts as reliable evidence of what a website may or may not have looked like in the past because they're not entirely reliable". Erm.. WRONG!
Look up UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS - MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD., Plaintiff, v. PLATTFORM ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Case No. 14-2464-JWL
The defendant tried to argue that the Internet Archive's pages weren't admissible because the Wayback Machine doesn't capture everything on the page or update every page from a website on the same date. The judge, after receiving testimony from an Internet Archive employee, disagreed. He found the site to a credible source of preserved evidence -- not just because it captures (for the most part) sites as they were on relevant dates but, more importantly, it does nothing to alter the purity of the preserved evidence.
Excellent summary
And it's important to note that Wired (and Gizmodo) definitely DID reference the doctored pages of Wright's own 2008 blogspot blog post in their investigative article despite Craig denying it in this video where he insisted their claims were based only of faked emails. I quote 'An August 2008 post on Wright’s blog, months before the November 2008 introduction of the bitcoin whitepaper on a cryptography mailing list. It mentions his intention to release a "cryptocurrency paper," and references "triple entry accounting," ' This
Wired's 2015 article goes on..
Dropping Breadcrumbs?
Despite that overwhelming collection of clues, none of it fully proves that Wright is Nakamoto. All of it could be an elaborate hoax-perhaps orchestrated by Wright himself. The unverified leaked documents could be faked in whole or in part. And most inexplicably of all, comparisons of different archived versions of the three smoking gun posts from Wright’s blog show that he did edit all three-to insert evidence of his bitcoin history. The PGP key associated with Nakamoto’s email address and references to an upcoming "cryptocurrency paper" and "triple entry accounting" were added sometime after 2013. Even the post noting bitcoin’s beta launch is questionable. While it was ostensibly posted in January 2009, it later seems to have been deleted and then undeleted-or possibly even written for the first time-sometime between October 2013 and June of 2014.
@@spiritusinfinitus he knows all these things and he also knows that other people know these things, yet he's going to court and at minute 49:00 he says "you know maximum penalty in this country for perjury? 20 years ...". so I think he has stronger evidence for his claim that would cancel these allegations. I'm saying 100 percent he's satoshi but I think interesting to watch what's going on and how it unfolds.
Navid Dadkhah I agree you Navid
@@naviddadkhah4485 If that's the case then why does he and Jimmy need to outright lie about the Wayback Machine page that was referenced here by the member of the audience, and why do they state that it's not credible evidence that is accepted by the courts when clearly it is, as a quick search of previous court records demonstrates?
It's very sad that this religious-like hoax has come out of the crypto space. He even speaks like if he were a messiah. His thoughts are the very opposite of what Bitcoin stands for.
Brilliant. All this hate is crazy. Let the man speak, and listen, and criticize in a factual manner if you have something to say.
43:27 She knows who the troll is.
Love it when Craig stands up and Jimmy gets N_erv_ous!
This guy is such a liar. The reason for "gold-backing" claim of anything is specifically meant to sucker people into using your worthless paper as "money" instead of gold.
All brace! Blockstream trollstorm incoming
trolling requires less cognitive resources than spending 1h watching something that'll only give them unnecessary headaches
@Darren Kis :) coming from someone that still delivers leaflets (nowadays, in a digital marketing era), you're the perfect example of how much business acumen the BTC proponents have
@Darren Kis see Allan's reply above. Your cognitive capabilities are reflected by the words you use: 'u', wut' and 'high'
You have no idea ladies and gentlemen. I am going to tell you right now that whatever you perceive to be the state of the art blockchain technology, any blockchain technology, in secret ladies and gentlemen Craig Wright is at least a very bare minimum fifty to a hundred years ahead beyond what you can even imagine.
bro you posted cringe
WTF? Guys a scam artist and you people are falling for it. Look into the Wiki history of Craig Wright, and see how he went back and changed a webpage then claimmed to be "Satoshi Nakomoto". Data showes when he did it. Guy cannot move one satoshi from a "Satoshi" wallet. People check this guy out before you invest in BitcoinSV, or he will be flying off with your money and leave you holding the bag. I gotta respect his come back plan thou, nobody saw that comming. But buying the "Copyrights" to the whitpapers of an "Open Source" project does not make you it's developer.
@Shadow Banned Which of Craigs many fake proof convinced you that he is Satoshi? All of you fake Craig fans talk about "do your research" but none of you can tell us what your research found that convinced you. Maybe you found some money in your bank account or you are just a fake botnet account.
He's a fraud.
@Shadow Banned evidence?
Damn lot of hate this guy received in the comments. I thought he was very interesting and made alot of sense.
We are equal in law.
Troll bs in these comments doesn't age well. It's like fake news and Trump in here 🤣
Read a lot of satoshis old comments from back when he was posting. I think CW might have hired the real satoshi to research a project like bitcoin. That guy released it captured the priv keys of the satoshi stash and destroyed them. CW can win in court that it was his funding that created the bitcoin paper and it is his property and he is listed as the creator. Real nakamoto probably died or is being tortured indefinitely for the priv keys to the stash that he probably terminated. Who knows but CW doesn't say he wrote tons of code and worked tirelessly with others to create the algorithm. But he demands that the name of satoshi is rightly his in the eyes of the courts. In my opinion CW has difficulty putting together sentences let alone code 6k plus lines. We can only prove it with a signature from the original block that is the proof that CW avoids talking about like it doesn't matter. How could satoshi sit around and argue he is satoshi all day and not once and for all prove it with a transaction or signature. Unless he is faking it his actions do not makes sense if he were the real satoshi mastermind / creator behind bitcoin.
Please go to court and prove what you saying. Thats simple
51:37 he got his question answered in the best best way imaginable,
Finally the truth comes out
You seriously think Craig is Satoshi? Lol
@@vester2196 I know for a fact that he is.
@@flagermusen How do you know that?
If he is he have done an incredible job giving proof he isn't. I have to give him that if that's the case.
Here's a good summery of all the evidence stacked against him:
bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright
But if you have any new evidence, would love to see that.
No way this guy is Satoshi
@@vester2196 There's plenty of evidence, but dumb dumbs are too stupid to find it. Here, let me spoonfeed you www.reddit.com/r/CraigIsSatoshi/
I don't even have to watch this through to realize it is "rat poison squared". Shame on whoever shares this, because all this person wants is media coverage and attention. If we simply turn our backs and don't even mention him anymore he will just fade away.
true!
If this talk is rat poison squared, then how are you still alive?
Move some Bitcoin from Satoshi's untouched wallet. I'll wait.
That doesnt really prove anything tho. If satoshis wallet get hacked.. does that mean the hacker is satoshi? No. Craig is obv. a fraud. But moving bitcoin is not proof
@@INeedsMoneys No it's not absolute proof, but still the best "proof" he has ever given though
@@vester2196 in my opinion. We need absolute proof. And absolute proof is impossible to get on this matter. So satoshi is forever Anonymous.
@@vester2196 well, I think that's exactly why he's going to court so people don't say he stole the keys. after that he'll sign. That's what I think going to happen.
@@naviddadkhah4485 He first need to prove he has the keys though. We'll see the 28th i guess.
If he had the keys in the first place, he would have signed them by now, instead of writing long incoherent gibberish blog posts with filled with lies and no proof at all.
Total frauds here
you included?
@@kadmon78 5 minutes of research will tell you wright is a nutter
"i will never be infront of a camera ever again" - Craig S. Wright the con man
Almost an hour of 101 how to not answer any questions
I am starting to understand more each day. Very interesting information here.
why you people invited these 2 scammers
No one invited them, CSW and Jimmy paid for the room to talk about this nonsense.
wait a minute.. isnt that the real Satoshi Nakamoto in the crowd at 51:01?
Hahahaha classic comment. Can't stop laughing. Especially because he takes his phone camera out too, probably saying to himself "so you wana take credit for my work do ya, let me just pass your mugshot on to the Yakuza byatch!"
I wounder how much Write paid for this debate. His media blitz for BitcoinSV is impressive, from 50$ to 200$ after being exposed as a fraud. You can debate crypto all you want but it's hear to stay. Goverments hate it, but it's the product of their economic abuse.
Sociopaths!
This is disappointing, Oxford.
This is super unrelated and will probably never happen but can we quickly just take some time to appreciate how funny it would be if Tyler the creator was interviewed here.
Is it you Mr. Maxwell?
Lol
She was hell bent on trying to make people equal. Like, nooooo. She is literally at Oxford, which most people can't afford, yet, she wants to be equal?! Equal to what?? Equal to us poor people? If so, give me her tuition money lol
Love bitcoin sv⚔️💯🏆🐺🤑😎
Good for CW, the audience didn’t seem very bright.
Academia is broken.
Nguyen the lawyer explaining the technical aspects of scaling.. priceless!
You do realize that this guy is not me. www.google.com/search?q=who+is+Christopher+Soper+to+bitcoin&oq=who+i&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j69i59l3.4594j0j4&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
I guess your feeble mind can't fathom someone being knowledgeable in more than one subject.
thank you craig
Any body can claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto but an extra ordinary claim requires an extraordinary evidence, I am not Craig Steven Wright, and he is me, I am Satoshi Nakamoto and my evidences are in the Genesis Block and in the timestamp, which I have embedded cryptographically.
Best thing he can do is give it a new name and improve technology - and disappear - his presence ego and all makes it unattractive investment - who cares if it’s called bitcoin. Who cares if he created it why he want that accolade - ? It would do a great service to crypto community if he just disappeared - work quietly in background. As most honest people do…So many coins are able start new with a new name. Improve the tech. It’s not usable at current moment. Maybe he should focus on usability instead of trying to bring btc down. Bitcoin is a store of value. That’s good enough - let’s create a new name and mission - not to destroy Btc .. that purpose is to harm millions of people. Instead just prove your tech and use case instead of forcing people to
When you compare craig rat ( on stage vocabulary to the Bitcoin white paper written vocabulary )its not even close. They dont speak the same language. not even close. This is very offensive, listening him speak
Im waiting for the real Satoshi to come forward.
Two fraudsters of Bitcoin
ontology lol get fucked you pump and dump shitcoin
@@theandy4ever bahahah
First 11 minutes are a very good introduction to Bitcoin (BSV).
Less than 2 hours and all the bots and trolls are already here :D Great speech from Craig and Jimmy.
Next level institutionalized shilling
Craig rat , speaks so poorly towards his bitcoin creation. Craig rat is not believable, I will never believe Craig Rat created bitcoi n, untill he moves 2 tokens from the 1st bitcoin wallet (period).
Apparently Mr. Jimmy Nguyen has said my comment is not true. I have told the truth. He has now Whatsapped me and threatened to sue me if I continue to comment. He is still insisting that I should pay him R25,000 for him to pay me $54,000,000,000. I am not going to. I will continue to comment.
I hear you Craig but we are not the judge. John 12: 47,48. The car was invented. How people use cars we are not the judge. Bitcoin is the same way.
Polymaths are fun to listen to. He's one of the few people I can't listen to at 1.5x
Not only that, but I have to watch over and over again to get everything. Even then I don't think I get everything.
@@ryanxcharles his worldview is quite the contrast compared to the average crypto advocate. When you look at the world empirically, you can easily see which worldview has the least resistance towards their objective, I am not sure if that will be sufficient tho.
@@ryanxcharles any word about Paymail and DNS security?
If this is Oxford I'm glad I went to community college.
31:02 Why even answer this? like what is even the question here? This is obviously a situation where she's trying to corner him to say something stupid and he fell for it.
Th jimmy guy really dont understand the purpose of transactions.. we get the point of the blockchain system attatched to make safe Transactions, but setting the goal to perform in 5 billion lives doesnt really make sense. Bitcoin is at a rise at this moment, not even bitcoin cash can become a daily transacted currency. Why you may ask? Because bitcoin is too attracted to the interests and so on, which doesnt make it an stable currency.
Compilation of +440 Craig Wright´s Post, Papers & Books in chronological order. ramonquesada.com/english/compilation-craig-wright/
The truth ?
Check Bitcoins Hashpower vs Bitcoin SV, hell compare BitcoinCash to it.
Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash are beating the hell out of SV atm. Nobody seems to want to mine it.
TSLA is currently worth more than the top five car makers combined. So what? That doesn't prove anything except that people are often irrational and ignorant.
Like him or hate him, you have to respect the fact Craig shares his true opinion regardless of the audience. Intellectual honesty is in short supply these days, crypto needs more people like him.
Sheesh that last 10min of the interview is something i never really thought about but makes perfect sense.
@Space Is the Place If he misunderstood the definition of equality than so did I! Am I wrong in understanding that there are two discrete forms of equality - equality in law (aka opportunity) and equality in outcome?
@@adamconnolly2899 Communists want to conflate the two, because their ideology rests on the principle of equality of outcome. Which is of course an absolutely insane and totally impossible concept.
Truth supersedes Twitter consensus. Thank God.
51:03 you can see the guy in the maroon shirt barely holding his shit together cause of how fucking incoherent and random the fraud sounds.
And what if he's "Wright" lol, Jimmy is brilliant, the fact that everyone is against BSV stinks to me, so I'll take the bumps from BTC and buy BSV and let it there long term, I believe in it. What if BTC has no use but is merely a store of value? I think 50 BSV is preferable to 1 BTC. CW leaves a lot to be desired in his swearing but he is highly intelligent and anyone that underestimates that quality is not.
Jimmy said evidence from the wayback machine wont be accepted in courts of law but a quick search brings this up, so maybe he isn't so brilliant? www.theregister.co.uk/2018/09/04/wayback_machine_legit/
@@sharpvidtube Almost anything can be admissible as evidence, but that doesn't mean it can't be thrown out later if there's no chain of custody or a screenshot can't be authenticated.
Who can open the bitcoin genesis block? That person rules bitcoin
Unless they sole it :) I don't think it makes much difference. Tim Berners-Lee invented the world wide web but he doesn't rule it.
@@sharpvidtube It is my understanding that : If you have the private key to the genesis block, you can change the code in it. Therefore you could change the block limit or you could turn it off. Is that not true?
I retract my original statement about the genesis block. I read about the development process on GitHub, changing the bitcoin network is extraordinarily difficult, also miners don’t have to accept changes, backward compatibility must be maintained as much as possible. Even a 50% attack is beyond the capabilities of almost any programming team. I honestly doubt that Satoshi is from this planet, those observing earth probably became concerned when they noticed that humans were disturbing the ecosystem of the earth by printing fiat to extract all the natural resources, so they provided a hard currency of fixed supply in hopes that earth people would use it and slow down. Hal Finley was not Satoshi nor is Craig Wright.
Adam Back.
Satoshi Nakamoto
Everyone knows this.... Craig is crazy
he is real satoshi!!!
49:00 triggered
Mr Wright is spot on tbe money.
Move a satoshi , come on do it. Yeh thought so.
He will only do that as a last resort.
The problem is once the Satoshi coins move, it will be too late to avoid the tsunami of panic selling.
These guys would make a great podcast with #JoeRogan
No they don't
First time I hear/watch Craig. My impression: twisted logic, sychopath, and unconvincing. Now I will never believe such a man produce amazing crypto innovation, like BTC....
_psychopath_ , even
you're just a moron with a low iq
@@iskdude9922 That is tautology... a moron is, by definition, a person with a low IQ. Maybe your tautology is evidence of your... low IQ?
The con has been exposed, and it is glorious.
Trolls incoming.Denying continuous
All he had to do was move a few sats and he could of silenced the trolls. As they annoy him so much, I can only think of one reason why he didn't do that. I also have to wonder why he teamed up with people like Roger Ver and Calvin Ayre? If I'm wrong, he's played a stupid game and has ruined his reputation anyway. He has a small cult following but most people don't want to have anything to do with BSV and its hard to see that changing. www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36213588
who can mine such a big blocks?
No Raspberry Pi
CSW. He has a bias to decentralized mining.
You can validate BSV in a Raspberry Pi, even with terabyte EMPTY blocks....
This didnt age well - Lightning Network lol
2 of the creepiest guys I've ever has the displeasure of listening to.
Anyone noticed Satoshi Nakamoto lately was really busy publishing on amazon?
lol
Why this porn is allowed on UA-cam?
Andrius Aleksejunas scat porn
the university rents that room... lol good acting Bitcoinsvconneeeeect
I fully agree about the equality Craig talked about. No doubt he is well educated and thoughtful person. And no doubt he is Satoshi too.
i just like cause craig is a genius, will watch this tmrw. good night
LOL
Sign a message with the private key or move some btc out of Satoshi's addresses. This is the only way somebody can claim is Satoshi. He nerver did it, so clearly he doesnt have any of Satoshi's keys.
Having Satoshi's keys doesn't prove anything. If I steal your keys, that doesn't prove that I am Flavio.
Craig is a fool. He does he think he’s fooling that he’s satoshi. Someone needs to ask him programming questions. Lol
we know whats in the bank vault........nothing
We know that peter pyke wet his pants.
@@antonlanoe4060 haha,just saw this.drying out nicely thanks
He just doesn’t have the technicality or understanding of bitcoin or cryptography for that matter. He just talks a lot of fluff to fill in the gap but says a lot without saying anything. Satoshi was a cryptographer not a theologist. Also, how can he be completely oblivious to Nick Szabo and BitGold when there are so many similarities between Bitcoin and BitGold both in ideology and concept.
"Oh, it's just White males. Well, it's not. I'm sorry, Western culture isn't White males. *"Augustus" [sic, actually Augustine]* of Hippo was African. *"Sophio" [sic, actually Sappho]* of Lesbos was female. And people understand that her poems about women were by a woman. That's western culture. It isn't just a whole lot of guys in white for the last 50 years bloody *Harvard's been teaching us... [???????? they have? lmao]* "
Poor guy didn't get answers he wanted.
when will he go to jail :-)