Osteopathic physicians in USA are trained as medical doctors which is very different from the UK and Europe. Are physiotherapists in the UK equivalent to physical therapists in USA? Another one to consider is Myopractics.
Some of the people commenting here should take about 4 years to research and educate themselves on somatovisceral and viscerosomatic reflexes along with musculoskeletal and organic field physiology so that they stop typing ignorant opinions.
A good insight into how similar they are and how if they are a good health care professional they are all trying to treat and help patients in an evidence informed patient centred matter.
Really? I feel this clarified better than the other vague videos I've seen. It seema that Osteos examine the general health to better understand and treat the injury, chiros focus mainly on the spine and its effects on the body, and physios focus on ongoing rehabilitation whilst working with doctors/surgeons.
I thought this video was quite informative. I'm web searching exactly what that vid covered for my back pain. Who should I see, as a new chiropractor practice has opened in my village? Last night was horrendous as I didn't have enough painkilling medication, so I felt my back pain worse than usual. I also realised the pain was not spinal but a rib joint may need putting back in place. Pain is also worse when lying down so no sleep. So on the web, I found the answers, & it's not physio.
Go see a physiotherapist, they will identify the cause of the problem and prescribe you exercises and stretches that will help you fix the problems and ultimately ease the pain, that is if you actually practice them. Those specific exercises and stretches are scientifically proven to bare therapeutic results. If you see a chiropractor, they will crack some of your joints, which, if you are hopeful, might reduce the pain momentarily for a really limited and short period of time. There is little to no evidence of the benefits of chiropractic. If you see an osteopath, they will actually do nothing. There is almost no evidence of any type of benefits related to osteopathy. It is a made up holistic alternative "medicine" and is most probably a scam.
Experience their practices for yourself, research practitioners in your area and see what each individuals approach helps you with and suits your situation and circumstances, you have the ability to recover.
Chiro focus on spine and impulse nerve adjustment and keeps design with many treatment tools, but actually weak for muscle and facial treatment in fact, Osteopathy is general manipulative treatment and in certain countries replaced orthopaedic but old fashion without latest manipulation research after with surgery capability, Physio is assisting with MD and Surgeons for rehab and actually more on muscle treatment and need to spends a lot of time and money
The Osteopath is kinda misguided. As osteos, the BPS model is useless to us as we use the barrier concept which is sadly misunderstood by so many osteos. We do our manual therapy, and then we refer out. We're not psychotherapists, we can't work with any of the other sides of the BPS. Wield the skills of your profession, and then refer out properly.
I could say the same for dry ultrasound, needling and cupping for Physiotherapists with low EBP. If it assists certain individuals in their back to health, you can't tell it as hokey. Btw I'm a physio and an Osteo.
DOs are pretty much only found in usa, in the rest of the world osteos are not doctors. Weird system you got there in the states, altough US educated DOs are recognized as docs in a lot of countries.
@@olivercondron583 Absolutely not. If anything, osteopathy bares even less credit than chiropractic. There is not a single scientific research pointing to good quality evidence on the therapeutic effects of osteopathy. Everything your osteopath tells you while grabbing your money is in fact unproven.
They all have doctorates and osteopaths even take the same board exams as MDs. All 3 professions take years of graduate level hard science and pass board exams at a doctorate level. Times are changing and healthcare is evolving as new evidence becomes available.
@@druidsongevergreens Not true, it depends of the country. Osteopathy and chiropractic are not recognized as legitimate by numerous universities across the world. All scientific research, including new ones, point to lack of evidence or poor quality evidence on the therapeutic benefits of osteopathy and chiropractic. Also, physiotherapy, which is the only one out of these three to be proven to provide therapeutic effects and the only one to be recognized by med faculties, does not require a PhD.
an osteopath sounds like if your GP, orthopaedic doctor and physiotherapist actually spoke to each other in a holistic manner.
Couldn't have said it better. Wonder how much time they spend in medical school.
@@tippitytop 5 years
Very interesting episode. Thank you for the content!
What's the role of chiropractic and osteopathic treatment in Post stroke paralysis????
Fantastic show. Thank you so much! :D
Osteopathic physicians in USA are trained as medical doctors which is very different from the UK and Europe. Are physiotherapists in the UK equivalent to physical therapists in USA? Another one to consider is Myopractics.
Some of the people commenting here should take about 4 years to research and educate themselves on somatovisceral and viscerosomatic reflexes along with musculoskeletal and organic field physiology so that they stop typing ignorant opinions.
Chiropractors are bs artists. Myofascial massage merely numbs your pain perception for fleeting moment and placebo is a real thing.
I feel like this was a waste of time. They aren’t describing differences, they are describing similarities.
A good insight into how similar they are and how if they are a good health care professional they are all trying to treat and help patients in an evidence informed patient centred matter.
Really? I feel this clarified better than the other vague videos I've seen. It seema that Osteos examine the general health to better understand and treat the injury, chiros focus mainly on the spine and its effects on the body, and physios focus on ongoing rehabilitation whilst working with doctors/surgeons.
The clear difference was explained. Only the physio said she works in hospital and that physio is evidence based .
@@jamesross4593 wow
@@jamesross4593 Good summary and pretty much what i got out of the video. Osteos seem the most comprehensive.
Having these three on together is comparing apples to unicorns.
Still don’t understand any of these !
kinda the same. mixed signals everywhere and i can't trust someone with my whole life
I thought this video was quite informative. I'm web searching exactly what that vid covered for my back pain. Who should I see, as a new chiropractor practice has opened in my village? Last night was horrendous as I didn't have enough painkilling medication, so I felt my back pain worse than usual. I also realised the pain was not spinal but a rib joint may need putting back in place. Pain is also worse when lying down so no sleep. So on the web, I found the answers, & it's not physio.
Go see a physiotherapist, they will identify the cause of the problem and prescribe you exercises and stretches that will help you fix the problems and ultimately ease the pain, that is if you actually practice them. Those specific exercises and stretches are scientifically proven to bare therapeutic results.
If you see a chiropractor, they will crack some of your joints, which, if you are hopeful, might reduce the pain momentarily for a really limited and short period of time. There is little to no evidence of the benefits of chiropractic.
If you see an osteopath, they will actually do nothing. There is almost no evidence of any type of benefits related to osteopathy. It is a made up holistic alternative "medicine" and is most probably a scam.
Experience their practices for yourself, research practitioners in your area and see what each individuals approach helps you with and suits your situation and circumstances, you have the ability to recover.
Do the speak with an Australian accent?
yes
Chiro focus on spine and impulse nerve adjustment and keeps design with many treatment tools, but actually weak for muscle and facial treatment in fact, Osteopathy is general manipulative treatment and in certain countries replaced orthopaedic but old fashion without latest manipulation research after with surgery capability, Physio is assisting with MD and Surgeons for rehab and actually more on muscle treatment and need to spends a lot of time and money
The Osteopath is kinda misguided. As osteos, the BPS model is useless to us as we use the barrier concept which is sadly misunderstood by so many osteos. We do our manual therapy, and then we refer out. We're not psychotherapists, we can't work with any of the other sides of the BPS. Wield the skills of your profession, and then refer out properly.
whoa, hard accent, where from? the pixie girl with red things is too cute n young
Australia
Physio rep here feeling a bit insecure.
physiotherapy is the only evidence based practice in this quackery
I'm a Physical Therapist and an Osteopath. You'd be surprised at how many EBP there are in Osteopathy. I'm unsure for Chiropractors though.
BULLSHIP!
It really isn’t
If DOs want to be legitimate they need to stop doing this hokey manipulation and chelation BS.
I could say the same for dry ultrasound, needling and cupping for Physiotherapists with low EBP. If it assists certain individuals in their back to health, you can't tell it as hokey. Btw I'm a physio and an Osteo.
DOs are pretty much only found in usa, in the rest of the world osteos are not doctors.
Weird system you got there in the states, altough US educated DOs are recognized as docs in a lot of countries.
You do realize chelation therapy is a type of treatment allopathic medicine uses for some instances of heavy metal poisoning
Three different levels of quackery
Except physiotherapy is an actual evidence-based medical science and actually fixes problems.
This moron just described physical therapy as quackery. Lmao
@@mickael3274 so does osteo
@@olivercondron583 Absolutely not. If anything, osteopathy bares even less credit than chiropractic. There is not a single scientific research pointing to good quality evidence on the therapeutic effects of osteopathy. Everything your osteopath tells you while grabbing your money is in fact unproven.
@@mickael3274 it does but ok then
God the chiropractor is like a stereotype
So awful
You are not doctors
They all have doctorates and osteopaths even take the same board exams as MDs. All 3 professions take years of graduate level hard science and pass board exams at a doctorate level. Times are changing and healthcare is evolving as new evidence becomes available.
@@druidsongevergreens Not true, it depends of the country. Osteopathy and chiropractic are not recognized as legitimate by numerous universities across the world. All scientific research, including new ones, point to lack of evidence or poor quality evidence on the therapeutic benefits of osteopathy and chiropractic.
Also, physiotherapy, which is the only one out of these three to be proven to provide therapeutic effects and the only one to be recognized by med faculties, does not require a PhD.
@@mickael3274 not rlly true but ok then
@@olivercondron583 Very strong and convincing argument. You win. I now believe in the fake pseudoscientific scam that is osteopathy and chiropractic.
@@mickael3274 ur welcome