Вот прочитайте заметку в ВК, там довольно подробно про материал и свойства vk.com/factory24?w=wall-9641007_6453 а здесь можно посмотреть варианты vk.com/album-9641007_222384837
different parts of the sword allow you to do different kinds of effort. And to say that the impact is the use of the sword blade on a different principle than when struck with a club - is not true. Some effort sword transmits it as a crushing action. Just for this it is necessary due to the use of the heavy sword in the time justified.
Longsword Russia yes, thats why if you want to do different things with longsword, you just turn it around and have a club. Swords do have different principles than clubs. Even from handling they have differences. You dont grasp sword like a mace, you wrap your fingers around and place your thumb palm on the handle. This way you can align the edge. Yoyre right, you can do bludgeoning atacks with swords, but it will have effect of smaller body parts. What i wanted to say is that longswords are made to cut, not to crush. You should know that most military swords were heavier civilian longsword will weight like 1kg, but military longsword will weight alot like 1.5kg in order to make cuts effortless due to wider cross section.
I'm not sure that the Google translator true to the idea of the text, but I'll try to answer you. You argue with the fact that the sword has functionality for blunt chop. Some authors, such as John Clements show that chop target, can be blunt sword. That is the quality of the impact is not achieved at the expense of one of the cutting edge sharpness, but also due to more body weight, which is used to strengthen strike.Weapon medieval warrior had to do with situations of interference in carrying out attacks. The sword had to be a little stronger to contact with armor elements and different types of weapons from the enemy. Therefore, the swords had not the same design features - the weight of a long sword could be from 1 to 2.5 kg. Other properties required to take into account the manner and conditions of fencing. edge of the sword is more profitable to put easy quick cuts, heavy part of the sword is convenient chop the target with a solid or an elastic surface to break bones or joints. Do you think that this is not the main task for the sword, but such attacks are possible and can be studied for the development of the power of coordination, balance and control. In the western fencing is not accepted, and even two-handed swords are trying to fence like spinning. This is a rather strange)
Longsword Russia "Some authors, such as John Clements show that chop target" - what if i told you that longsword martial artists laugh from clements? - youre absolutely right, swords can chop. All military swords can chop actualy like: talwar, saber, longsword, shamshir, shashka, katana, falchion... "That is the quality of the impact is not achieved at the expense of one of the cutting edge sharpness" - the swords i listed above achieve cutting by edge sharpness except early falchions. "The sword had to be a little stronger to contact with armor elements and different types of weapons from the enemy" - yes, thats why swords were made out of good quality hardened steel most of the time. nobody would try to cut things like maille or plate armour. Edge contact did damage the blade sometimes and thats why certain cultures avoided blade contact like early medieval norse, mongol, japanese. " the weight of a long sword could be from 1 to 2.5 kg" - longsword weights 1.6/1.7 kg max. 2.5kg is a greasword but even that uses sharp edge to cut. "heavy part of the sword is convenient chop the target with a solid or an elastic surface to break bones or joints" - Nobody tried to break bones or joints with sword, but you could break fingers, wrists and collar bones if they are unprotected. Other than that swords cannot break bones for opponent even with just a gambeson. "Do you think that this is not the main task for the sword, but such attacks are possible and can be studied for the development of the power of coordination" - no, i think that breaking bones with sword is impossible, but as i said you can break fingers without even trying. No historical sword fighting system gives lessons how to break bones with swords. "In the western fencing is not accepted" - what is not accepted? you fell out of context a little bit. If i understand you correctly, then yes, it is not accepted to try to break bones with swords. "and even two-handed swords are trying to fence like spinning" - you mean spinning with greatswords? thats if youre fighting multiple opponents and you want the momentum as your blade is long and because of physics fast traveling blade tip will cut more effectively.
Longsword Russia European sword historical weights from surviving swords in museums. 1 handed - 650 grams to 1.5 kg. Hand and a half (longswords and two handed falchions) - 800 grams to 1.4 kg. 2 handed (greatswords) - 1.5 kg to 2.6 kg source - ejmas.com/jwma/articles/2005/jwmaart_dawson_0205.htm
Спасибо ребят, интересный канал.
Хорошее видео. А вашего оппонента кто мечом насквозь пронзил? На спине у него выходное отверстие, как от клинка )))
+Артём Баринов это секретная информация!
Nicht schlecht, gar nicht schlecht!
Из какого материала сделаны ваши клинки для тренировок?
Вот прочитайте заметку в ВК, там довольно подробно про материал и свойства vk.com/factory24?w=wall-9641007_6453 а здесь можно посмотреть варианты vk.com/album-9641007_222384837
спасибо!
Спасибо!
2:17 you dont need to rend with longswords. This is a bladed weapon, not a mace.
different parts of the sword allow you to do different kinds of effort. And to say that the impact is the use of the sword blade on a different principle than when struck with a club - is not true. Some effort sword transmits it as a crushing action. Just for this it is necessary due to the use of the heavy sword in the time justified.
Longsword Russia yes, thats why if you want to do different things with longsword, you just turn it around and have a club.
Swords do have different principles than clubs. Even from handling they have differences. You dont grasp sword like a mace, you wrap your fingers around and place your thumb palm on the handle. This way you can align the edge.
Yoyre right, you can do bludgeoning atacks with swords, but it will have effect of smaller body parts. What i wanted to say is that longswords are made to cut, not to crush.
You should know that most military swords were heavier civilian longsword will weight like 1kg, but military longsword will weight alot like 1.5kg in order to make cuts effortless due to wider cross section.
I'm not sure that the Google translator true to the idea of the text, but I'll try to answer you. You argue with the fact that the sword has functionality for blunt chop. Some authors, such as John Clements show that chop target, can be blunt sword. That is the quality of the impact is not achieved at the expense of one of the cutting edge sharpness, but also due to more body weight, which is used to strengthen strike.Weapon medieval warrior had to do with situations of interference in carrying out attacks. The sword had to be a little stronger to contact with armor elements and different types of weapons from the enemy. Therefore, the swords had not the same design features - the weight of a long sword could be from 1 to 2.5 kg. Other properties required to take into account the manner and conditions of fencing. edge of the sword is more profitable to put easy quick cuts, heavy part of the sword is convenient chop the target with a solid or an elastic surface to break bones or joints. Do you think that this is not the main task for the sword, but such attacks are possible and can be studied for the development of the power of coordination, balance and control. In the western fencing is not accepted, and even two-handed swords are trying to fence like spinning. This is a rather strange)
Longsword Russia "Some authors, such as John Clements show that chop target"
- what if i told you that longsword martial artists laugh from clements?
- youre absolutely right, swords can chop. All military swords can chop actualy like: talwar, saber, longsword, shamshir, shashka, katana, falchion...
"That is the quality of the impact is not achieved at the expense of one of the cutting edge sharpness"
- the swords i listed above achieve cutting by edge sharpness except early falchions.
"The sword had to be a little stronger to contact with armor elements and different types of weapons from the enemy"
- yes, thats why swords were made out of good quality hardened steel most of the time.
nobody would try to cut things like maille or plate armour. Edge contact did damage the blade sometimes and thats why certain cultures avoided blade contact like early medieval norse, mongol, japanese.
" the weight of a long sword could be from 1 to 2.5 kg"
- longsword weights 1.6/1.7 kg max. 2.5kg is a greasword but even that uses sharp edge to cut.
"heavy part of the sword is convenient chop the target with a solid or an elastic surface to break bones or joints"
- Nobody tried to break bones or joints with sword, but you could break fingers, wrists and collar bones if they are unprotected. Other than that swords cannot break bones for opponent even with just a gambeson.
"Do you think that this is not the main task for the sword, but such attacks are possible and can be studied for the development of the power of coordination"
- no, i think that breaking bones with sword is impossible, but as i said you can break fingers without even trying. No historical sword fighting system gives lessons how to break bones with swords.
"In the western fencing is not accepted"
- what is not accepted? you fell out of context a little bit. If i understand you correctly, then yes, it is not accepted to try to break bones with swords.
"and even two-handed swords are trying to fence like spinning"
- you mean spinning with greatswords? thats if youre fighting multiple opponents and you want the momentum as your blade is long and because of physics fast traveling blade tip will cut more effectively.
Longsword Russia European sword historical weights from surviving swords in museums.
1 handed - 650 grams to 1.5 kg.
Hand and a half (longswords and two handed falchions) - 800 grams to 1.4 kg.
2 handed (greatswords) - 1.5 kg to 2.6 kg
source - ejmas.com/jwma/articles/2005/jwmaart_dawson_0205.htm