Balance Beam D-Score Zhou Yaqin (CHN, 2nd, 14.700) - 2023 World Championships Antwerp - 10/8/2023
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 жов 2023
- Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for 'fair use' of purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise infringe.
So good! I love the side series and Amazing triple twist dismount, so high!
Lovely and clean!!!
A forma que você coloca as conexões fica um pouco confuso de entender, se possível, faz igual outros canais que fazem de uma forma mais simples
i dont think the judges should've credited her tuck full to straight full jump connection either... clearly there was a slight balance check
In previous quad, gymnasts' routines were being scrutinised for the slightest pause and they lost the connection. This routine with some pause and balance check was rewarded with connection bonus
I think in this quad a slow connection is credited by the D panel
But the E panel will deduct for slow connection
So if the connection isn’t fast enough it ends up amounting to nothing
She didn’t use any extra arm swings or other body movements to generate momentum from the side tuck jump 1/1 into the side hop 1/1 though, which is how the D panel decides if a connection between two dance elements happened or not. She also submitted an inquiry in an attempt to to get credited for the attempted 6.8 D, which means that the judges got to watch that sequence again in slow motion. They could’ve deducted her more if it was appropriate.
@@asharadayne6159se ela conectar a primeira série acrobática b+d com os dois saltos b+a ela teria 0.4 em conexão?
@@asharadayne6159se isso valeu mesmo com um desequilíbrio, por que no início os 4 elementos não foram consideradas conexão tbm? Sendo que ela ligou muito mais rápido? 🤷🏼♂️ fica impossível entender os critérios, porque não fazem o menor sentido
You gave the DCC all connected but you didn’t give it a series bonus which would have you a 6.6
0:35 a 0:40 por que esses quatro elementos não formaram uma conexão sendo ligados imediatamente e aqui 1:06 1:07 foi ligado, sendo que há claramente um desequilíbrio e uma pausa? 🤷🏼♂️ Os critérios de julgamento não fazem sentido algum 🤦🏼♂️
Mas eles formaram uma conexão, B+D (acro) 0.2, D+B (misto) 0.1 e bônus de 3 elementos 0.1. Só ali ela ganhou 0.4.
O quarto elemento wolf jump é A e não conta pra ligação, só requisito.
Só olhar na legenda do vídeo ou no lado esquerdo: B+D+.2+B+.1+.1+A
I cant undestand why the side tuck jump 1/1 is D andd the side streched jump 1/1 is C
Because of the stupid FIG they downgraded it this quad
They will donwgrade the tuck jump 1/1 next quad dont worry lol at fig
I think because your feet are farther from the beam during the jump and you have to change shape to land. I’d guess that that increases the fall risk.
Jumps performed in side position (starting in side position and ending in side position) worth +0.1 than if performed in cross (regular) position.