How SpaceX manufactures a new raptor engine every 24 hours shock the entire industry...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 лют 2023
- How SpaceX manufactures a new raptor engine every 24 hours shock the entire industry...
1. HUGE THANKS TO:
2. SOURCE OF THUMBNAIL:
Izan Ramos / izanramos2002
3. SOURCE OF IMAGES AND VIDEOS:
Stanley Creative: / @stanleycreative
Clarence365: / clarence3652
/ @clarence3654
Ryan Hansen Space: / ryanhansenspace
/ ryanhansenspace
Evan Karen: / @evankaren
iamVisual: / @iamvisualvfx
Everyday Astronaut: / erdayastronaut
/ everydayastronaut
C-bass Productions : / cbassproductions
Kevin Randolph: / cosmicalchief
Toby Li : / tobyliiiiiiiiii
Callum: / hisdirtremoves
HoppAR: / hoppar_app
Project Road to Mars: / roadtomarsx
/ @projectroadtomars
Austin Barnard : / austinbarnard45
SpacePadre : / spacepadreisle
Toby Li : / tobyliiiiiiiiii
Kevin Randolph: / cosmicalchief
Ezekiel Overstreet: / ezekieloverstr1
LabPadre: / labpadre
/ labpadre
Adam Cuker: / adamcuker
Owe @Bl3D_Eccentric: / bl3d_eccentric
Spacex 3D Creation Eccentric : t.co/QGbEwDwv7j
TijnM_3DAnimations : / m_tijn - Main source
TijnM: / @tijn_m
Cosmic Perspective: / cosmicperspective
SpaceXvision: / spacexvision
=========
How SpaceX manufactures a new raptor engine every 24 hours shock the entire industry...
The Raptor engine is the muscle of the SpaceX Starship program. Thirty-three of these Raptor 2 engines power the Super Heavy booster that serves as the vehicle's first stage, and six more are used by the Starship upper stage. For a successful lunar mission, these engines will need to re-light successfully on the surface of the Moon to carry astronauts back to orbit inside Starship. If the engines fail, the astronauts will probably die.
Luckily, so far, SpaceX has done "very well" in working toward the development of a vehicle to land humans on the surface of the Moon, especially the new Raptor rocket engine.
"SpaceX has moved very quickly on development," Mark Kirasich, NASA's deputy associate administrator who oversees the development of Artemis missions to the Moon, said about Raptor. "We've seen them manufacture what was called Raptor 1.0. They have since upgraded to Raptor 2.0 that first of all increases performance and thrust and secondly reduces the amount of parts, reducing the amount of time to manufacture and test. They build these things very fast. Their goal was seven engines a week, and they hit that about a quarter ago. So they are now building seven engines a week."
But that's still not enough Elon Musk has even set his expectation that SpaceX has to make a capacity of 2000 raptors per year.
How SpaceX manufactures a new raptor engine every 24 hours shock the entire industry... - Наука та технологія
So many people are going to be blindsided when they realize how much progress has been made. Most people don't have it on their radar what is to come.
I can't wait to find out what ridiculous arguments spaceX detractors will come up with in order to claim that what SpaceX did is not impressive
@Ken North Starship and 99% of all Elon's fantastical ideas will stay where the always have, in the realms of fantasy. He's a hype artist, as he has proved countless times...
If Starship is operational and a success within Elon's lifetime feel free to come back here and rub it in my face... I'm confident that won't happen. Same for self driving cars, his tunnels, the hyperloop, Electric HGV's being a success, solar roof tiles, replacing commercial planes with space rockets, colonizing mars... Not of it is happening in his lifetime or likely his grandchildren's lifetime for most of them. Some will just never happen...
@Ken North You've got me there, I've seen the design for the rocket engine which is what gave me the scepticism I have for it but that's about it.
It looks insanely complex even for a rocket engine. The more points of failure it has the more chance there is of failure...
Rockets safety records haven't improved all that much in 70 years, in the first 5 years we went from about 50% failure rate to about 20%. Over the next 10 years or so we got it down to 10% and then for the remaining 55 years or so we've hovered around the 5% area...
My point is rockets are tricky, it's basically a controlled bomb. So adding all that complexity and making such a huge engine only fills me with scepticism...
They may get it off the ground and even have a successful launch at some point but if it remains viable I will be truly amazed.
Who's not building it? I know Elon's not, he's an investor who likes promoting crazy ideas... But I thought SpaceX was building it, which is his company... Am I mistaken?
I'm glad we can agree on the other scams though. 👍
@@88Cardey Aren't your failure numbers quite high? Even Apollo only had one engine failure in all the crewed flights (so 1%), and STS had 1xSSME loss and 1x catastrophic SRB failure, so about 2/(135x5) = 0.3%. Merlin 1D has had ~2000 engine-launches, with I think 2 or 3 failures in flight, none catastrophic. Where do you get your 5% figure from...?
@@susanw1 I replied yesterday with a link showing the graph I used as a reference but youtube didn't seem to like it...
The vast majority of space flights are unmanned and so most of the failures are with unmanned...
Some of that will be added due diligence for manned flights but it also just comes down to attrition, over 90% are unmanned. Between 1-5% is accurate though depending on the year...
And 1-5% is terrible as a safety record if you're looking to commercialise it. They'd need to be about a million times safer, using planes as a comparison....
Good luck with that, going off the progress we've made since the late 50's.
One of my new favorite terms, "Uncontrolled disassembly". Great reporting.
That cracked me up too.
Pretty incredible how positivity and willingness to succeed at all costs is so infectious that it can bring this many people together with the common goal
Brilliant, concise and complete.
So now I know how to make my own space ship!
American industry is amazing
America is amazing. PS I'm not American.
So much dense information.
So rare for commentary on materials/ metals science, thanks!
All I can think about is how all of the numbers are not just the best one person can do, but the best our species is capable of doing in our entire existence. Congratulations Humanity!
Is doesn’t take that much. Just has to be a very brilliant man! Doesn’t happen every day. Doesn’t happen often. But it does happen. And when it does, it is absolutely amazing!
3:55 quick correction: Oxygen molecules are NOT lighter than methane molecules. You reported the mono-atomic mass of oxygen, the molecular weight is double this.
3:40 "in pursuit of the greatest possible efficiency Raptor's turbopump will run oxygen rich. . ." As I understand it the Raptor engine is a full flow stage combustion cycle. A full flow stage combustion engine uses both oxidizer-rich and fuel-rich preburners. The cycle allows full flow of both propellants through the turbines. That is to say, one preburner all of the fuel and some oxygen runs through (fuel rich). The other preburner all the oxygen and some fuel goes through the burner (Oxygen rich).
Was looking for this comment 👍🏻
Was wondering the same thing. Guess someone else has also seen everyday astronaut´s video ;)
I for one am not shocked, or even surprised, but I am thrilled!😄😉 Great reporting!👍👍
Excellent job!
"Uncontrolled disassembly" I like that term :D
Outstanding presentation with Facts/Figures/History and 'Lively Editorial Comment'! Thank you...🇺🇸 😎👍☕
Would love to see version 2 on a bench being pulled down after a mission with re-lights , Good video you got my Subs
$100 million for 1 RS25 ? were a raptor 2 costs $250,000 if not less ! Nasa needs to start putting there funding to better uses than blowing it all on old technology and spare parts !
NASA KNOWS this, they also want to pick SpaceX for their future mission but they can’t
because those traditional rocket manufactures from many states are not happy, and asked their state senate to do something to save their business of government contract
You describe how SpaceX outpaces NASA, but not why. The why is: government programs operate on a completely different set of incentives than private sector programs. We see this everywhere in government. Government is not good at doing things.
Government Vs private industry. Government will always take longer as bureaucracy leads to inefficiency on a day to day basis. A private company doesn’t tolerate Laziness like a government organization would. Look the DMV and government officials.
Actually, the REAL “why” is cleverly revealed in another SPACEX video; when Jay Leno visits. Elon lifts the lid on the make up of the mission to Mars, building a shit ton of craft really quickly is imperative, just like the robots. Some of the missing bits you’ll need to engage both logic and imagination (as Elon does) in overdrive to see what MUST happen. (No spoilers here, go watch!)
Amazing!
Government programs are spending tax payers money. Efficiency and legality of these spendings require the amount of burocracy that comes with it. As a tax payer you would want to know your money is well spent on the plans it was intended for. Every change in these plans need to be evaluated and approved before they can be implemented. Not so for SpaceX. Elon Musk can decide today they're going left and tomorrow, if he thinks it's necessary, he can decide they're going right. Not much evaluating and approval needed.
@@Retinalism I would argue that you are describing the “how”. Getting mars established does require hundreds of spacecraft of different types. The “why” NASA can’t do it and Musk can is because government isn’t good at anything.
@@Dutch1961As a taxpayer, I know my money is not well spent. Now what?
But, yes, completely different incentive structures as you describe. Musk is focused on getting to Mars. NASA is focused on keeping NASA alive.
For me the huge difference between NASA, and also other space agencies like ESA, is the vision for the future. Spacex have a plan for the future and knowns that only an industrial mains can be achieve this goal. To reduce the costs a market is needed and space created the market like Starlink to have payload for Falcon 9, manufacture in serial the rocket, reduce the cost by launch and then to be competitive to gain clients.
Wow! Great video!
Thats neat. Can't wait to see them mounted, lit and flying into orbit.
2000 rockets a year / 365 days in a year = 5.5 rocket engines a day.
Rocket engines that will never see space nothing has ever been to space which starts at 62 miles above the earth rocket engines can not produce thrust in a vacuum
Go SpaceX!!!!!❤
"Uncontrolled disassembly" sounds like somthing you'd hear from an snl skit
Most information. !!!!!!!
“Uncontrolled Disassembly” mmmm yes, more please ❤
You just describe so easily and quickly and get all the details about what you are meant to do i just love to hear about the great news on how the engines are made more simple and praacice and on top of that the much more trust. Beautiful presentation. THAT IS HOW IT'S DONE. SHORT, PRECISE, AND NOT HARD TO FOLLOW.🔥🇩🇰❤️🇩🇰COPENHAGEN❤️🇩🇰❤️DENMARK🇩🇰❤️🇩🇰🔥
Excellent Reporting , loved it .
Looking at the weights of CH4 & O2(Methane & Oxygen molecules), I am thinking 12 for C, 2.104 for H2, & (2×15.995) for O2. So I get 31.99 for O2, & 12+4.208 for CH4=16.208. Doesn't really affect your conclusions, maybe loaded propellant weights though.
Good show! When will they get the reliability up to support rapid reusability? 31 out of 33 is not good enough for rapid reusability.
10m/s is about the max-reliable speed of engine components ... in high end sports cars.
It's why F1 use larger bore vs stroke (high HP) ... because the speed those engine parts can move reliably is finite if you exceed that number.
I thought they got rid of igniters on raptor 2. He briefly mentioned it during its walkthrough video with Tim Dodd
As a former Aerospace Company employee, they are not building 7 Raptors a week, they are completing , 7 a week
Awesome thank you 😊
Baby kingDom Khmer 😍 love SpaceX 😍
Weight of O2 molecule is not 16, it is 32.
They"re mounting more than five rockets engines by day ! This guy can't be from this planet !
The engines turbine having to be machined as an OEM piece requires a long and timely CNC Processing.
I was wondering if they put cooling fins on the outside of rocket engines if that would all make them even more durable it would work like an air cooled motor cycle 🚲
The engine and engine bell are already liquid cooled. Most rocket engines use the fuel itself in a similar capacity to fluid in a car's radiator. Everyday Astronaut has an amazing video on engine design and goes through all the different variations on rocket engine cooling.
Top drawer thanks
What missions are these being used on?
Good video. Terrific information. Elon Musk has repeatedly said "We realized that the true problem, the true difficulty, and where _the greatest potential is_ - is building _the machine that makes the machine."_ Anyone who understands what he meant, and what Tesla and Space X are doing and then invested based on this has made a lot of money and will make a lot more.
You are Fired !
It's surprising how much can be gained by a simple devotion to industrial efficiency - like in car industry, and not like in some lab. Lab-like environment is the cradle of the space industry, bu none should remain in a cradle forever. :)
You guys have it figured out!!
Actually they just hired that mail sorting guy from men in black, hes since switched to nicotine gum
We wont have to worry about our kids moving across the country now it'll be leaving to Mars when they turn 18 😂
Radiation belt.....oh yeah we haven't figured out how the moonlanding missions did that either.....
Lmfao 🤣🤣🤣
What nonsense, Van Allen himself had that solved back in the 60's. Someone has been gulling you and gulling you hard.
@@TheEvilmooseofdoom So you know how the so call moon landing missions went through Van Halen belt?
Please do explain this great knowledge!
O2 mass = appox 32 amu, methane mass = approx 16 amu @ 3:45 in video
Space X will ,,rule,, 🚀
классное видео )) Но Без ядерных двигателей все это неосуществимо и пустышка я про полеты на Марс
Aggree with you 👍
Почему ? Летали же
@@user-qv6ud2hx6f куда летали ?? Даже на Луну спорное утверждение ... Там много противоречивых фактов . А на марс люди еще и не летали совсем ...
@@ZGURZA Корабли летали
@@user-qv6ud2hx6f речь про полеты с Людьми ,конечно . Про всякие марсоходы и спутники для Марса я вообще не веду речь . В Видео вообще-то намеки про полет людей , а то про SpaceX разговоры бы и не заводили б . Потому что старых ракет вполне хватает ...
👌 👍
I'm surprised that Elon Musk doesn't have his own name Smelter. So he can keep an eye 👁 the grade of stainless steel that he gets for his rockets 🚀.
Did anyone else spot Elon's Cybertruck parked in the background on 4:05?
I think I would wait until after a test launch before you start mass producing them?
These engines look very similar to the turbocharged engines the Russians had built back in the 1960s, that were hidden away until after the Soviet Union fell and they were brought out and looked over again.
The main difference between NASA and SpaceX is that one is run by the government and the other private. That's all you need to know.
Please explain 3:50.
Oxygen atom = 15.999u
Oxygen Molecule = 31.998u
Hydrogen atom = 1.007u
Carbon atom = 12.011u
Methane molecule = 16.039u
Now in an elevated temperature I would imagine these molecules breaking down into ions and therefore oxgen is still the heaviest there with carbon coming second at 12.011u.
And why would you want a less dense fluid going through a turbo pump if you had the choice? less dense means you either need higher gas velocity (temp) to extract more energy from the dynamic pressure, or more fluid flow overall.
The real reason is it's a Full-Flow Combustion Cycle engine. One pump does fuel-rich, the other does oxidiser-rich and when both streams of the pumps are merged in the main combustion cycle, they are both nice and hot gas fluids that burn very cleanly.
Now to get that to work IRL is not easy without it blowing up and SpaceX have done a wonderful job at making it look easy.
I've now looked at comments below and I'm not the only one
He is South African ,the old government made petrol out of coal,dad 3 newclear weapons
Well done Mr e
At tis point I wouldn't be surprised if Boeing and Airbus should also watch their backs as a starship can be used for ultra fast transport of 100+ people on Earth from, say, Japan or China to the US and back in like 1/2 hr.
nonsense. no infrastructure
@@esecallum You've quit already? Don't expect to be hired by Elon any time soon!
@@paulcunnane4 your a brainwashed as a muskrat. how they gonna land this rocket without a launch tower? how is to going to be refueled?
Not sure the use case is there and it would seem cost-prohibitive especially given the fuel required. The Concord went out of use because there wasn't enough demand for very fast flights. The ride likely would be brutal, not very fun or safe for the elderly and the infirm.
They probably use glowplugs instead of spark plugs
Omg actual human narration instead of a tts bot like in 95% of these types of videos.
NASA engineers are humiliated by Space X Engineers
They have different target
Did Velo3D a disservice showing Relativity Space's robotic printers...
เราจะใช้พลังงานยูเรเนียมหรือเตาปฏิกรณ์พลังงานนิวเคลียร์แทนเชื้อเพลิง..ลดปัญหาการลงจอด....ของจรวด....ฐานของจรวดควรเป็นใบพัด.,.ทั้งสี่ด้าน...ฐานลองรับกระแทกพื้นให้มีโชคอั้พกันแรงกระแทก...ใบพัดช่วยในการลงจอดให้นิ่มนวลและใช้ควบคู่กับพลังงานเตาปฏิกรณ์นิวเคลียร์ยูเรเนียม
Damn thats fast to build all those engines!! Much faster than the 50 years its took for the aliens to remove their bases from the moon ! lol i hope I'm alive to see people back on the moon now its vacant. 👽👽👽👾👾👾👾
For SpaceX starship. The shape of thing to come is going out of business. For failing to recognize real world problems in materials, number of engines, imperfect hot stage ring , and lack of adhesive adhesion to stainless. Today it couldn’t be more wrong. If your rocket is too heavy to reach a circular orbit to allow it to orbit without falling out of orbit back to earth just to burn up. This requires a serious change. But SpaceX appears to be wearing musk blinders. At least young engineers are gaining valuable real world experience on what not to do. I have to question? Did anybody run the numbers through a supercomputer on weigh with the amount of thrust on hand. Ift-4 should attempt to orbit earth with about 10 rotations. Then the following melt down won’t seem did bad.
🚨 I don’t diddly about stocks…. Do you guys think the high rate of spending with spaceX will affect the stock value? ANY response is greatly appreciated. THANK YOU GUYS 🙏🏻
Lol he was talking about work hours and then the operator bumped into a generator. 16:30
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
What if drones could be built for the main purposes would to
What if we could build drones used for seeking out and finding new materials.
Who knows what types of material that could be found on asteroids.
Greta engineering , engineering , science Thanks to Elon Musk and his team
More engines the better bc more = better
First time moon landing preparation
ความเสียหายอยู่ที่ตัวฐาน....ควรคำนวนค่าอย่าผิด
100 MEGATONS? 9:47
bruh
fair play Elon ourkid and his SpaceX team,keep it up,love and bless you all,your Jojo..
Subnautica is starting to become real xD
Right on Elon keep it up now build another assembly line and shoot for 4000 a year your gonna need them engine's
This video is riddled with inaccuracies, oversimplifications, and misunderstandings. It is simply a summary of other videos and articles - some official press releases and some just nonsense. Worst of all, none of them are cited.
I totally agree /believe Elon is a smart E.T.🤩😇
can't wait to go to the moon! who wants to go outside it 224 degrees
Faith Based Investment Scheme
No other scheme generates more
investment
Theres 33 engines not 32 on the first stage buddy
musk is obcessed
What would happen if you had million pounds of air pressure. Would save a lot of fule. Top-secret I guess. New engines I guess.
You'd have yourself one hell of a pressure vessel!
Small nuke would cause a lot of air pressure. We probably get to Mars. And a couple of days.
Is Mars going to be a colony of USA?
Probably. Be like a dusty version of the Philippines ....
Nice video but in the first 1/3 of your video you don't differentiate between the Raptor 1 and the Raptor 2 engines. Raptor 2 has much less junk hanging off of it and is more powerful than the Raptor 1.
Torch igniters are not used in the Raptor 2, that was some of the stuff that they got rid of.
Then you finally mention Raptor 2. You are probably confusing people with going through old, no longer used technology then saying Oh they made a new Raptor.
Then you do not specify which engine you are talking about through the latter half of the video further confusing new viewers.
Then talking about Teslas????
I have a great idea why not have a booster that all of it burns and when u get to orbit the booster will be gone and you won't have to save it just see a booster Everytime u launch. That does away with alot of problems and adds to simplistic launches. Think of the advantage to the burnable booster it would mk life so much easier it would do away with so much problems. And add to so many advantages. Think about it and if it isn't the best idea for a booster problem I could use the profets. I am broke completely broke I believe it will help the space x industry and me as well my name is Gerald Akers thank you
You know what else is mass produced at speed and breaks easily? Every poorly made, mass produced thing ever.
That's a simple understanding at best.
@@TheEvilmooseofdoom no it really isn't. Musk is just reselling antiquated dangerous weapons tech.
Did Elon Musk gave you the thumbnail 😅?
What
A capa do vídeo está muito engraçada a cara do putin e Biden. 🤣🤣🤣
Well, with due respect to the great minds at Space X, it boils down to a single individual Genius, not scared to fail, but certain that there is a lot of more room to work beyond accepted engineering limits. It is the current repeating success story of all Elon Musk Enterprises. including Tesla, his childhood dream turned to an extravagant reality, on an ever unrelenting quest to build the perfect car, and almost there, and shocking all competitors.
Gak canggih bro Uda ketinggalan jauh teknologinya SM cina
"Uncontrolled disassembly" ? Translations: Catastrophic failure, gianormous explosion, BOOOM!!! And lots of fire and smoke. Sheesh, 'uncontrolled disassembly". Note: to disassemble you traditionally disassemble - NOT BLOW IT UP!
SLS will get cancelled. Starship will do everything SLS does. I give it 5yrs
Don’t forget Elon musk who help you yes it was Americas raptor so Elon you don’t Owen it the people of America have all rights because you would’ve been able to build it so yes well done America???
Thank you American Taxpayers.
3:31 “ in the pursuit of the greatest possible efficiency”
Now, I realize you’re just a UA-camr, but you got so much wrong about SpaceX is turbo pump(s) that you should never ever even mention them again. Yes I said pumps. Their are two. By blabbering on about why you think that “the pump” runs oxygen rich incorrectly, you demonstrate the lack of knowledge of which engine cycle they are using and the basic layout of the engine. This is something that you clearly don’t understand.
Looks like a Hindu temple pillar