The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
Please don't let them die. They represent a millennia if not more of knowledge that nobody will ever certainly won't hear anywhere else ever. We love them.
millions of years of knowledges in 1 peoples we are light in these vessels that help us traverse the land. treat it as ur temple. protect nurture n love ur temple where u meet ur ancestors spirit guides n source of all creation. ur teachings are simple yet have such depth. as it should be will come about. heaven on earth is the mission at hand love n appreciation for u 🤗💕💖 xxx
@@ChristaFree well u not being sure of the teaching isnt on my concern tbf. my interpretation is the truth weather u appreciate it or not. i dont need to remind u some ppl are further along their path where others have never been aware of teachings (of any description). i work with ppl that have not been as fortunate as others n have been on the ascension path/journey all my life. i know trurh when i hear it from any culture. i do hope u have the opportunity to absorb other teaching to find commonalities for deeper truths than what the 3D, within the veil of illusion, has taught us. the reality is much more expansive than this matix. (ull find it in ur sleep) 😁🤗💕💖 xxx
@@TerreHauteRemoteGoat we never die. the vessel we reside in does. but if we treat the body mind spirit n heart with exceptional care we can live many 100s of years. we are able to live 800y or more in reality. ppl restrict themselves n so dont really live with truth. we have been lied to all our lives for 100s of 1000s of yrs. we need to see the truth n refuse to be slaves to the masters. every1 is equal but are seen in classes. these teachings need to have innerstanding n overstanding to recieve them to the fullest 🤗💕💖 xxx
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
@@trentitybrehm5105 All that and more. The Jews wasn't the only ones He visited and taught after His resurrection. From the Hopi stone tables, the Dine sheep skin scrolls, to the Anishinaabe birch bark scrolls, there will be a lot coming out soon about the Man of Peace, the Holy Teacher, the Man of Kindness. There will be a lot coming out very soon declaring the return of the Son of God who visited them nearly 2000 years ago visiting His sheep not of this (Jewish) fold. I know the Anishinaabe will be presenting some of their key scrolls in September with that purpose.
What an incredible blessing it has been for me to listen to the beautiful teachings you enjoyed as a child and young adult given so generously from the old and very wise people of your nation. THANK YOU. NOTHING BUT RESPECT. LOOKING FORWARD.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
I am from nz I am Maori so I am still learning about my cultureI love all of this and listening to the old ones I used to listen to to my grandmother praying in Maori I loved listening to her
Your lucky to learn about your Native American heritage. My great grandfather never talked about our Native American heritage. Sadly I find out years later the reason they didn't because they would be badly punished for teaching Native American heritage. 😪
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
This lesson tonight is so very special and important to me. Many years ago I was a manger at WNMU and a young man and woman who were brother and sister were Deni. He kept losing his way and I helped his sister bring him back to the beauty way. When she told of my help my wife and I were given the great honor of the sweat lodge. We were told it was because we were on the path and needed the teaching of the lodge. Now I understand the great honor that really was. How they saw something in us that was so important is the spirit. I give thanks and gratitude everyday. Thank You for your teaching.
@@trentitybrehm5105please take that elsewhere, it is not appropriate nor appreciated here, as so many sins were done in the name of christianity to so many beautiful indigenous people. Thank you for any input that does not seek to hurt or belittle this beautiful culture. May god guide you to the path of beauty and happiness.
@@PeaceJourney...Regardless of how those people acted back then, the beauty of Christ surpasses all of that. God guided me here to tell ya'll about Jesus Christ. He is the way, the truth, and the life, and no one comes to the Father except through him.
I am not Navajo, but I regularly watch these traditional Navajo teachings with Wallace. The wisdom he shares is universal. I love listening to him! May God bless him! ❤️
Could we bring back the stories of the elders in this time frame please? Beyond this channel and including this channel? Much appreciation for what is happening here on this UA-cam channel.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
"Take care of yourself, body, mind, heart and spirit. Listen to your conscience." This is beautiful and so hard in practice but so easy to speak. ❣️Thank you for sharing this.
Forgive me for assuming the familiar but bless you Wally for all you do! Your words of wisdom are always inspiring and instructive! All the best to you and yours!
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
Thank you elder. I am listening and I won't stop doing the work. The beauty way has been here with us from the beginning, it's up to us to stay on the path. We are constantly being tested in many ways. The holy ones are with us even when we believe we are alone. Thank this man for sharing his wisdom. The holy ones allowed it. AKE HE
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
You are meant to speak shaman. Never be silenced by man. There was a time when we were all one. That time will come again. The knowledge must be taught now.
As being raised in a white world I have been lied to about most of history & everything spiritual. I'm old & my time is short.What learn here makes sense to me. Wish I was aware of traditional truths taught here years ago. Thank you for passing on truth & knowledge.
You were 'raised in a white world' LOL what is there a planet where on white people exist? LMAO let me guess you want to apologize for being white right?
Wally, most of our children have been disregarding what the elders have taught through the years, no respect, no manors, too distracted with devices, self absorbed and missing such beautiful teachings of their ancestors. Many would not know how to survive in the world, finding water, heat source to cook and stay warm. It is a sad time. Many people love and appreciate your teachings. I went and sat with a beautiful Madrona tree yesterday where someone to a torch to it. I put my back up against the tree and prayed with it for its healing and mine. I thanked it for its beauty. Deep gratitude for nature. Thank you Wally.
I have run into so many young people who declare themselves atheists. They say there is no spirit and only material stuff. I just don't know what to say to them. They seem to have rejected most religious teachings of old, but they don't have any replacement other than a void.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
I feel honored to hear the teachings from the Holy People. I realize many arent ready to receive. Truth must be given especially to those that ignore, it is ignorance that destroys ✨️your Spirit tells you, YOU have to make the changes yourself for yourself! You are either which will you choose. Hope help is always available when you walk the beauty path✨️🙌🏻✨️
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
The children of the light can be found all over the globe, but we aren't always recognised. It's why you must teach people of all countries who are willing to listen. I'm from regional South Australia 🇦🇺 and I had a healing by a native American fellow whom touched my on my forehead while I was asleep, and it helped heal me both spiritually and physically.
Хвала вам за дар виђења, који сте поделили са нама. Дошло је време да се каже. Мислим да је потребно да човек оде у тишину и да престане да прича, или да прича што мање, да би сазнао истину, која је тај духовни ниво о коме причате, тај почетак душе. Јер данас је свуда бука, не чује се глас душе када је бука око нас, јер је то тихи глас у нама, који треба да чујемо. А када је бука и када човек пуно говори и не престаје да говори гласно о животу свакодневном, онда тај глас који нас учи не чује се од свакодневних обавеза и буке. Говорите као свети човек, као онај који зна. Мислим такође, да сваки човек који хоће речи истине, мора да додирне земљу, Земљу, као део себе, руком, или босом ногом, или да слуша ветар и птице; ако живимо у граду, веза са учењем је све тања и тања, јер је град измишљен да буде мач који сече ум од The Holy People. У граду ништа нема целину, зато и човек у граду постане без целине. Неће човека оставити свети људи, The Holy People, никада, ако човек мислима, умом, потражи свете људе, и да потражи искрено и са искреним сузама. Искреност душе је пут до истине, да ли се слажете? Мислим да је искреност син истине. Зато све више људи пате, јер беже од искрености према истини, искрености према себи и искрености према Створитељу. Поздрав из Србије (🇷🇸)!
@@trentitybrehm5105 wow you don't get it do you? I see you posting this same stuff all over this page and while I can appreciate your faith, it really has no place here. go find some satanism page to preach to because they might actually need it, but the people who come to this channel usually have their own faith and probably are just a tiny bit sick of hearing people like you all the time. stop bothering people.
I learn the most by not asking anyone but creating a relationship with the earth around me. My focus has been learning gardening, how to collect seeds, what is good for what. It seems so much learn, and it is. After learning that the earth will provide you the medicine you need, in what people call weeds usually, i find myself engulfed in learning about the plants that Google doesn't even care about. I like books to help my journey. Little bits of knowledge i pick up from others. I feel it's vitally important. I'm sick of everything my peers care about. I replaced them with weeds. And rodents. I own a bunch of rodents. I could eat them but for now, i won't. Thank you, youngin and elder. I get much inspiration from your generous sharing. 🎉
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
Semper Fi Brother. Because of you, the people and culture will never be forgotten. Those on the beauty way path will know this, the more you stay on the the path the more enemies you will gather.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
Thank you so much... What you are saying is so, so important for all of us, first and foremost our children and grand children. Thanks for your knowledge.. 💕❤️💕
"Your conscience condemns or condones you". Yet too many have seared their conscience as with a hot iron in these times that we are now living. They no longer hear it as they have refused to listen to it and turned away from it for their own reasons such as selfishness, greed, lust, envy or ill gotten gain. They justify what their conscience is sayin is wrong. And brush aside what they know by conscience is right and are gently compelled to. Such as kindness, compassion, caring, giving and respect for this earth and their neighbors. ♾
The path to God is hard. It’s hard not feeling like a victim. It seems the world is against you. To stand on faith takes so much courage and strength from within. Once you have proven your faith cannot be broken you will become stronger than you ever imagined. That time has come and the Nations will rise to be stronger than they ever imagined. God sees you and has answered your prayers. The universe loves those that don’t give up. You are very loved.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
I don't know why the reply following is attached other than the fact that we are all connected,these teachings are from time in memorium ..Christianity only took interest 2,000..years ago..and a lot of the Christiaan stories are borrowed..the inner concious is in everyone regardless of faith..I believe Jesus was aware of this...we are on the cusp of a new age ..not to be confused with the 4 worlds..When I see the conflict in the old world I know it is time to move away from these testaments..return them from where they came..The water..Then and only then will the truth rise again.
comfort has conquered consciousness in modern times, in all cultures not just the Dine... When I find myself getting close to comfort, I just remember that only the support of the system can provide comfort.. and we must rely on the system for comfort. We must pay our spirit as a price for comfort.... Comfort is a trick,... it did not exist in the indigenous tribes before the system took over.
I would like.to here more of the stories of the old people on this chanell please. I have never heard their teaching. I am on I guess a soul searching trip kust tryimg to understand it all not doing to well on my own.
I wish I could share this with my old friend Carla, she's of the Bitter Water Clan same as Wally, Page side of the Rez. She is home I pray and no longer bouncing around
Have no sorrow for the condition of our fellow man , it is a result of the modality of time that has bankrupt our spirt. But of coarse that will change soon enough!!! For those whom know this simply live in Joy . Nothing is ever lost for the memories of all that have gone before us remains. If only we could remember.
Conscience. Regardless of where it comes from, I always know which way to take-the right way will be more difficult. If I decide to be lazy, I don't complain about the results.
Thank you Wally. Your gentle and direct way of sharing eternal truths is so needed, and is greatly appreciated. You affirm everything I have been taught and believe. Thank you. May Heavenly Father preserve you and your wisdom.
I've been listening since this channel was small. It brings me so much joy to see how many people are now here! It's the most important knowledge we could ever be blessed to hear.☀️💛☀️
Thanks Wally, you truly are a man of Knowledge. Our concious(ness) only works when we are present and in alignment. Only when our head and heart are in harmony will we "hear" our conscience. Jimmy Cricket is never far away! Do you ever listen to the eternal crickets? They can teach us a lot without ever saying a word...
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
Have you ever looked at the part of you that had to type this as a response to what I said? It has no context in relation to my comment. I neither confirmed nor denied Jesus. Only when we see what controls us can we make a CONCIOUS decision to awaken to the forces that operate us.
Thank you Wally for teaching me how to walk on the Beauty way path. Doing this has blessed me beyond measure. Thank you Wally and Shane for introducing non natives to the wisdom of your Navajo Traditions. Thank you both for the weekly blessings we all receive from your work on behalf of all who are seeking.
I’m a settler on Haundenosaunee Land the reason people don’t want you sharing is probably because of the exploitation that occurred and hijacking’s of sacred practices from my people. With that being said, I wish to acknowledge your Díne teachings. Thank you. I feel this is so important to share and I hope that all First Nations communities reap health and wealth! Your Teachings are so connected to the Earth and community. It’s so vital now.
Thank you for sharing your knowledge. I have visited many Navajo sweat lodges... Window Rock, Fort Defiance, Steamboat, etc. These experiences helped bring me back to my own ancestral heritage (Irish) through the shared wisdom and natural expression of masculine and feminine through the sacred. I am grateful for this. I sat through my nephews' sweat lodge for their coming of age into manhood ceremonies as their father wants to restore this tradition, in honor. Wise words you share. Don't waste this life that you've been given.
Through space, through time, through culture, through life’s, we thank you for your wisdoms of ancestors and everything you say I take to heart and beauty happens. UBUNTU
Wally has a gift for sharing profound truths gently and briefly. Wally, you are a true gift from God. 🤗 You were made for this time.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
@@trentitybrehm5105amen 🙏 Christ is the LORD.
Gift from God, you comfortable my soul
Please don't let them die. They represent a millennia if not more of knowledge that nobody will ever certainly won't hear anywhere else ever. We love them.
Exactly... Wonderful people and, don't ever lead. The pig-, coloured there... Never!
millions of years of knowledges in 1 peoples
we are light in these vessels that help us traverse the land. treat it as ur temple. protect nurture n love ur temple where u meet ur ancestors spirit guides n source of all creation.
ur teachings are simple yet have such depth. as it should be will come about. heaven on earth is the mission at hand
love n appreciation for u 🤗💕💖 xxx
@@intenselyrich3517uk I'm not sure that's true.. I've never heard that claim made by him
@@ChristaFree well u not being sure of the teaching isnt on my concern tbf. my interpretation is the truth weather u appreciate it or not. i dont need to remind u some ppl are further along their path where others have never been aware of teachings (of any description). i work with ppl that have not been as fortunate as others n have been on the ascension path/journey all my life. i know trurh when i hear it from any culture.
i do hope u have the opportunity to absorb other teaching to find commonalities for deeper truths than what the 3D, within the veil of illusion, has taught us. the reality is much more expansive than this matix. (ull find it in ur sleep) 😁🤗💕💖 xxx
@@TerreHauteRemoteGoat we never die. the vessel we reside in does. but if we treat the body mind spirit n heart with exceptional care we can live many 100s of years. we are able to live 800y or more in reality.
ppl restrict themselves n so dont really live with truth. we have been lied to all our lives for 100s of 1000s of yrs. we need to see the truth n refuse to be slaves to the masters. every1 is equal but are seen in classes.
these teachings need to have innerstanding n overstanding to recieve them to the fullest 🤗💕💖 xxx
I am grateful that you share the teachings of the old ones with us. It is a good time for the restoration of that which was lost.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
@@trentitybrehm5105 All that and more.
The Jews wasn't the only ones He visited and taught after His resurrection.
From the Hopi stone tables, the Dine sheep skin scrolls, to the Anishinaabe birch bark scrolls, there will be a lot coming out soon about the Man of Peace, the Holy Teacher, the Man of Kindness.
There will be a lot coming out very soon declaring the return of the Son of God who visited them nearly 2000 years ago visiting His sheep not of this (Jewish) fold.
I know the Anishinaabe will be presenting some of their key scrolls in September with that purpose.
What an incredible blessing it has been for me to listen to the beautiful teachings you enjoyed as a child and young adult given so generously from the old and very wise people of your nation. THANK YOU. NOTHING BUT RESPECT. LOOKING FORWARD.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
I am not Navajo. I am Caucasian with some Indian decent. So thank you for this teaching. I am grateful.
I am from nz I am Maori so I am still learning about my cultureI love all of this and listening to the old ones I used to listen to to my grandmother praying in Maori I loved listening to her
Your lucky to learn about your Native American heritage. My great grandfather never talked about our Native American heritage. Sadly I find out years later the reason they didn't because they would be badly punished for teaching Native American heritage. 😪
I appreciate what you are doing here.
Can I appreciate something without implying that I have a full understanding of it?
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
Thank you very much grandfather.
This lesson tonight is so very special and important to me. Many years ago I was a manger at WNMU and a young man and woman who were brother and sister were Deni. He kept losing his way and I helped his sister bring him back to the beauty way. When she told of my help my wife and I were given the great honor of the sweat lodge. We were told it was because we were on the path and needed the teaching of the lodge. Now I understand the great honor that really was. How they saw something in us that was so important is the spirit. I give thanks and gratitude everyday. Thank You for your teaching.
Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life, and no one comes to the Father except through him.
@@trentitybrehm5105please take that elsewhere, it is not appropriate nor appreciated here, as so many sins were done in the name of christianity to so many beautiful indigenous people. Thank you for any input that does not seek to hurt or belittle this beautiful culture.
May god guide you to the path of beauty and happiness.
We make our choices......hate will never manifest Love.
@@PeaceJourney...Regardless of how those people acted back then, the beauty of Christ surpasses all of that. God guided me here to tell ya'll about Jesus Christ. He is the way, the truth, and the life, and no one comes to the Father except through him.
@@PeaceJourney... If you don't want me to talk about Jesus, then that's exactly where Jesus needs to be talked about.
Such an intelligent man. More people need to listen to him. 😊
I am not Navajo, but I regularly watch these traditional Navajo teachings with Wallace. The wisdom he shares is universal. I love listening to him! May God bless him! ❤️
thank you for speaking wisdom to those with ears that will listen ❤
Could we bring back the stories of the elders in this time frame please? Beyond this channel and including this channel? Much appreciation for what is happening here on this UA-cam channel.
It truly would be priceless to hear and understand the ways .
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
"Take care of yourself, body, mind, heart and spirit. Listen to your conscience." This is beautiful and so hard in practice but so easy to speak. ❣️Thank you for sharing this.
My cat was sleeping but he woke up when he heard the drum then your voice he listens to you ...he doesn't listen to any other thing on any device ...
Forgive me for assuming the familiar but bless you Wally for all you do! Your words of wisdom are always inspiring and instructive! All the best to you and yours!
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
Thank you elder. I am listening and I won't stop doing the work. The beauty way has been here with us from the beginning, it's up to us to stay on the path. We are constantly being tested in many ways. The holy ones are with us even when we believe we are alone. Thank this man for sharing his wisdom. The holy ones allowed it. AKE HE
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life, and no one comes to the Father except through him.
🇺🇸🏜💙 Love be too you all!!!
SIR THANK YOU!! 🙏🏼
Wisdom be had on this great channel!!
Superior 👈
Beautiful people love all of you .. ❤❤❤
@@nataliejanvrin1751 👍💙👈🙂
What you are saying needs to be taught to everyone.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
@@trentitybrehm5105God I love you
You are meant to speak shaman. Never be silenced by man. There was a time when we were all one. That time will come again. The knowledge must be taught now.
As being raised in a white world I have been lied to about most of history & everything spiritual. I'm old & my time is short.What learn here makes sense to me. Wish I was aware of traditional truths taught here years ago. Thank you for passing on truth & knowledge.
You were 'raised in a white world' LOL what is there a planet where on white people exist? LMAO let me guess you want to apologize for being white right?
Oh! My Goodness!!! This is a deeply powerful teaching!!!! Thank you so much!! A'chehei!!!! Blessings and Beauty All Around ❤
Spot on
Thank u sir for sharing ur wisdom
We are grateful
Much Love light & respect
❤❤❤❤
One of your most valuable, useful, and uplifting postings! Thank you!
Wally, most of our children have been disregarding what the elders have taught through the years, no respect, no manors, too distracted with devices, self absorbed and missing such beautiful teachings of their ancestors. Many would not know how to survive in the world, finding water, heat source to cook and stay warm. It is a sad time. Many people love and appreciate your teachings. I went and sat with a beautiful Madrona tree yesterday where someone to a torch to it. I put my back up against the tree and prayed with it for its healing and mine. I thanked it for its beauty. Deep gratitude for nature. Thank you Wally.
Ahe'hee' Greetings from SW OK. We need a reset, and to go back to old ways that respect the earth.
Thank you Grandfather
Thank you Blessed Elder! We so need your wisdom! 🥰
I have run into so many young people who declare themselves atheists. They say there is no spirit and only material stuff. I just don't know what to say to them. They seem to have rejected most religious teachings of old, but they don't have any replacement other than a void.
Trying to fill the place in their soul that can only be filled by a relationship with our CREATOR. 😔. It is incredibly sad.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
Beautifully written, @@trentitybrehm5105
I wish I had the benefit of the teaching of the old ones when I was young. The things you are saying are so important. Thank you.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
@@trentitybrehm5105 Sir this is a Wendys.
I feel honored to hear the teachings from the Holy People. I realize many arent ready to receive. Truth must be given especially to those that ignore, it is ignorance that destroys ✨️your Spirit tells you, YOU have to make the changes yourself for yourself! You are either which will you choose. Hope help is always available when you walk the beauty path✨️🙌🏻✨️
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life, and no one comes to the Father except through him.
The children of the light can be found all over the globe, but we aren't always recognised. It's why you must teach people of all countries who are willing to listen. I'm from regional South Australia 🇦🇺 and I had a healing by a native American fellow whom touched my on my forehead while I was asleep, and it helped heal me both spiritually and physically.
Shi eh dine nishlii...ahyeee for posting this. Keep teaching us out here who need some guidance. Ahehee....you are appreciated....♥️
Хвала вам за дар виђења, који сте поделили са нама. Дошло је време да се каже.
Мислим да је потребно да човек оде у тишину и да престане да прича, или да прича што мање, да би сазнао истину, која је тај духовни ниво о коме причате, тај почетак душе. Јер данас је свуда бука, не чује се глас душе када је бука око нас, јер је то тихи глас у нама, који треба да чујемо. А када је бука и када човек пуно говори и не престаје да говори гласно о животу свакодневном, онда тај глас који нас учи не чује се од свакодневних обавеза и буке.
Говорите као свети човек, као онај који зна.
Мислим такође, да сваки човек који хоће речи истине, мора да додирне земљу, Земљу, као део себе, руком, или босом ногом, или да слуша ветар и птице; ако живимо у граду, веза са учењем је све тања и тања, јер је град измишљен да буде мач који сече ум од The Holy People. У граду ништа нема целину, зато и човек у граду постане без целине.
Неће човека оставити свети људи, The Holy People, никада, ако човек мислима, умом, потражи свете људе, и да потражи искрено и са искреним сузама. Искреност душе је пут до истине, да ли се слажете?
Мислим да је искреност син истине. Зато све више људи пате, јер беже од искрености према истини, искрености према себи и искрености према Створитељу.
Поздрав из Србије (🇷🇸)!
Beautiful. Hello from the Navajo nation. ❤
Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life, and no one comes to the Father except through him.
Blessings to the 🇷🇸 Serbian people
@@trentitybrehm5105 wow you don't get it do you? I see you posting this same stuff all over this page and while I can appreciate your faith, it really has no place here. go find some satanism page to preach to because they might actually need it, but the people who come to this channel usually have their own faith and probably are just a tiny bit sick of hearing people like you all the time. stop bothering people.
These words of yours, brilliant and so well delivered. Eye opening with eyes shut. Thank you
Wow , What a great teaching .
I learn the most by not asking anyone but creating a relationship with the earth around me. My focus has been learning gardening, how to collect seeds, what is good for what. It seems so much learn, and it is. After learning that the earth will provide you the medicine you need, in what people call weeds usually, i find myself engulfed in learning about the plants that Google doesn't even care about. I like books to help my journey. Little bits of knowledge i pick up from others. I feel it's vitally important. I'm sick of everything my peers care about. I replaced them with weeds. And rodents. I own a bunch of rodents. I could eat them but for now, i won't. Thank you, youngin and elder. I get much inspiration from your generous sharing. 🎉
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
This man changed my way on how to perceive life. His wisdom is out of this world. Thank you my friend.
Semper Fi Brother. Because of you, the people and culture will never be forgotten. Those on the beauty way path will know this, the more you stay on the the path the more enemies you will gather.
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life, and no one comes to the Father except through him.
The backdrop is so beautiful..
🤟🏿🖖🏿
Thank you so much... What you are saying is so, so important for all of us, first and foremost our children and grand children.
Thanks for your knowledge.. 💕❤️💕
Please youth, keep this gift alive. My native tribe lost/(gave up?) our ways by 2000, and I have no one who says they remember. 😢
"Your conscience condemns or condones you". Yet too many have seared their conscience as with a hot iron in these times that we are now living. They no longer hear it as they have refused to listen to it and turned away from it for their own reasons such as selfishness, greed, lust, envy or ill gotten gain. They justify what their conscience is sayin is wrong. And brush aside what they know by conscience is right and are gently compelled to. Such as kindness, compassion, caring, giving and respect for this earth and their neighbors. ♾
I'm so thankful for everything you taught us so far 🥺
He gives me hope and grounding.
Thanks for sharing your wisdom.
The path to God is hard. It’s hard not feeling like a victim. It seems the world is against you. To stand on faith takes so much courage and strength from within. Once you have proven your faith cannot be broken you will become stronger than you ever imagined. That time has come and the Nations will rise to be stronger than they ever imagined. God sees you and has answered your prayers. The universe loves those that don’t give up. You are very loved.
I so look forward to these teachings..this one goes very deep..It is very real..so blessed A'he'hee!
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
I don't know why the reply following is attached other than the fact that we are all connected,these teachings are from time in memorium ..Christianity only took interest 2,000..years ago..and a lot of the Christiaan stories are borrowed..the inner concious is in everyone regardless of faith..I believe Jesus was aware of this...we are on the cusp of a new age ..not to be confused with the 4 worlds..When I see the conflict in the old world I know it is time to move away from these testaments..return them from where they came..The water..Then and only then will the truth rise again.
Please tell your knowledge to us. We are listening, acknowledging your wisdom. Thank you.
comfort has conquered consciousness in modern times, in all cultures not just the Dine... When I find myself getting close to comfort, I just remember that only the support of the system can provide comfort.. and we must rely on the system for comfort. We must pay our spirit as a price for comfort.... Comfort is a trick,... it did not exist in the indigenous tribes before the system took over.
So precious, profound love & thanks 🙏🏼🫶🏽🐚🤩
I respect my elderly n the ancestors
I would like.to here more of the stories of the old people on this chanell please. I have never heard their teaching. I am on I guess a soul searching trip kust tryimg to understand it all not doing to well on my own.
The law of the holy people is written upon your heart.
As M. Gandhi said in order to change the world I must change myself first.❤
Miigwech Mishomis Wally ❤
I wish I could share this with my old friend Carla, she's of the Bitter Water Clan same as Wally, Page side of the Rez. She is home I pray and no longer bouncing around
Thank you!!! I just had a “lightbulb moment”! Your teachings are absolutely amazing. 😊❤
We need to give them the land back. They are the true leaders.
Thank you, I hope many others hear this.
Have no sorrow for the condition of our fellow man , it is a result of the modality of time that has bankrupt our spirt. But of coarse that will change soon enough!!! For those whom know this simply live in Joy . Nothing is ever lost for the memories of all that have gone before us remains. If only we could remember.
Cherish another as thyself to Walk in Beauty.... Believe in what you do and be patient.... Thanx4sharing
👍 😊 👌
10:02 the wisdom. What wisdom you attain governs your Life' hear on Earth. (Heart) Be about your elders warnings and teachings!
Ignoring your conscience is dangerous & ignoring intuition is just plain stupid.
🕊 🐎🐎🐎🐎🐎🐎 🇺🇸 🇭🇺 🇲🇳
Conscience. Regardless of where it comes from, I always know which way to take-the right way will be more difficult. If I decide to be lazy, I don't complain about the results.
Greetings from Apacheria in the Arizona Territories Ahe'hye'e
Thank you.
I love these❤
Thank you Wally. Your gentle and direct way of sharing eternal truths is so needed, and is greatly appreciated. You affirm everything I have been taught and believe. Thank you. May Heavenly Father preserve you and your wisdom.
Thank you for sharing ✌🏽💖🤟🏽✨️🧚♂️
Many blessings ancestors. Att. JahRa
The contrast between the Prussian Blue background and the yellow-red color spectrum patterns is brilliant
Thank you so much dear grandfather Wally❤
Blessings and Love from Austria.
The flower never blooms without planting a seed. Knowledge comes fast, wisdom takes time...
This is all true, we are all conscious energy, we are all connected, we are all FAMILY! We need to LOVE ONE ANOTHER, NOT WAR WITH ONE ANOTHER ❤️🙏❤️
Such hard truth must be spoken to and comprehended by this generation! Thank You Wally❤️🙏
I've been listening since this channel was small. It brings me so much joy to see how many people are now here! It's the most important knowledge we could ever be blessed to hear.☀️💛☀️
Don’t forget to leave likes and notifications ❤
Being responsible is to be aware yet so many are deceived by self.
Absolutely awesome. Thankyou so very much.. much love!
Hi relative. Love you lots.
Thank you so much for sharing the teachings of the people❤️!
When Wally spoke of how the Elders Prayed, he was very blessed to be present at the time. It almost gave me goosebumps honestly.
Thank you very much.
Thanks Wally, you truly are a man of Knowledge. Our concious(ness) only works when we are present and in alignment. Only when our head and heart are in harmony will we "hear" our conscience. Jimmy Cricket is never far away! Do you ever listen to the eternal crickets? They can teach us a lot without ever saying a word...
The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him.
If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb.
If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves.
The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament.
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven.
We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection.
It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead.
The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing.
There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too.
Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture.
This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text.
It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
Have you ever looked at the part of you that had to type this as a response to what I said? It has no context in relation to my comment. I neither confirmed nor denied Jesus. Only when we see what controls us can we make a CONCIOUS decision to awaken to the forces that operate us.
Thank you Mr. Brown AND Shane!
Much love compassion Honor Equality 😊
Thank you Wally, the world needs the teachings you share.
Thank you Wally for sharing your knowledge and wished and hopefully the Navajo beliefs and history never goes away.
I love these teachings. It makes me think about where I am in my life. Thank you.
Thank you Wally for teaching me how to walk on the Beauty way path. Doing this has blessed me beyond measure. Thank you Wally and Shane for introducing non natives to the wisdom of your Navajo Traditions. Thank you both for the weekly blessings we all receive from your work on behalf of all who are seeking.
I’m a settler on Haundenosaunee Land the reason people don’t want you sharing is probably because of the exploitation that occurred and hijacking’s of sacred practices from my people. With that being said, I wish to acknowledge your Díne teachings. Thank you. I feel this is so important to share and I hope that all First Nations communities reap health and wealth! Your Teachings are so connected to the Earth and community. It’s so vital now.
Wtf are you pooping about. You don't speak for all non natives. "Your people" lol and It's De'ne billigana .
😂😂😂
You're not a settler. You were born there.
@@RivetMantisBiligana means white people. What are you talking about? What's a white Dine?
TY and God Bless!!!
My mother tried to teach us this. I remember a lot. Your teaching is helping me rediscover this. Thank you for sharing ❤
The Awareness of Conscience, IS The Awareness of The Heart.
❤To Guide The Youth To Feel, And Know, Their SACREDNESS.❤
❤T0 Feel Consciousness, IS T0 Know, SACREDNESS❤
I've had the opportunity to hear a lot of this growing up in the Navajo nation. This is a sacred place of lost souls.
I want to be with the Indian people to learn love how they teach God I love you 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️
An invaluable and timeless teaching for All.
Let their ears be opened to Truth of the Beauty Way.
Thank you for sharing Elder Wally.
I'd love to be taught by this man his knowledge is so holy thankyou I'm very grateful 🙏
Thank you for sharing your knowledge. I have visited many Navajo sweat lodges... Window Rock, Fort Defiance, Steamboat, etc. These experiences helped bring me back to my own ancestral heritage (Irish) through the shared wisdom and natural expression of masculine and feminine through the sacred. I am grateful for this. I sat through my nephews' sweat lodge for their coming of age into manhood ceremonies as their father wants to restore this tradition, in honor.
Wise words you share. Don't waste this life that you've been given.
All I hang around is old people, I learn so much from some of them💯
I always get such a peaceful feeling and great wisdom from Wally's teachings
Through space, through time, through culture, through life’s, we thank you for your wisdoms of ancestors and everything you say I take to heart and beauty happens. UBUNTU
💯 Truth ❤ thank you for sharing 🙏 ❤️
One of the Great Wise Elders of our time.