It's used as a transitive verb and the cop is giving. Brief description of how, we (cops) are going to tresspaass you ( give you a warning/citation for trespassing) I also look at it like if someone says I'm going to learn you which is really saying I am going to teach you I don't know if I made any sense you let me know if I did
Ok I agree that used like this "We're going to trespass you" or "I'm going to trespass you" that could be used as a transitive verb, but nonetheless the transitive form would mean "We're going to (commit an offense against) you" because the verb trespass is defined as I stated in the video, and because the cop is referring to a person not a piece of property or land. But when you cops say "we're going to trespass you" you have in your mind a meaning or understanding that is not available to anyone but cops and that is not a known definition in the English language. Therefore, it is unreasonable for law enforcement to expect a member of the public to understand the meaning of a word that was made up by cops and that is not accepted as part of the English language or at least some codification of law. It's sort of like speaking to an English person using the Russian language as a Cop in an English speaking country. Giving commands in Russian. It would not be reasonable to do such a thing. It's like malpractice. It's offensive.
trespassing here is refusing to leave a property once asked to leave. its not trespassing for entering unless you have been told in the past to leave and was given an official warning whcih can only be issued once you refuse to leave as stated before. OR if they have a sign every 10ft stating no trespassing. no sign then they can only be given a warning when the cops show up, but only if they are found on the property and are refusing to leave... as for the law, the laws define the words in the law itself, if it doesnt then and only then can the dictionary definition be used. this is how all us laws work both state and fed. like the word terrorism under the patriot act means something vastly different then what webster defines it as...
Ok I agree, but explain to me how you believe the following sentence makes actual sense either according to the dictionary definition or according to any statute or ordinance: "The owner wants YOU TRESPASSED"
Reading a dictionary term is pointless as you need to read the exact law for that place or, country or state. Trespassed meaning that he was not welcome in that place and without permission you are trespassing. Ridiculous not a scam at all. Read the law not the dictionary description. He had no right to have a copy of the agreement, only his wife could get it.
That's exactly the point, the word "trespass" is strictly a legal term. It goes back even to the Bible, it is a common law legal term. That's like saying "If you give us $100,000 dollars we will sell you this house and you will own it." But then you go to court and complain that you were defrauded and the Judge says "Sir I understand you lost your $100,000 dollars and you do not get to reside in the house that you bought, but don't you understand how stupid you are? In this county the word "Sell" means that the person you gave your money to gets to live in the house you bought, and "Own" means that you have no right to use use visit or enter the house that you bought." And then when you ask the Judge what law states this the Judge says "Sir we are sorry but there is no law that says that, that is just what you find out after you pay your money, because we all already knew that but its not written down anywhere." Hahaha.
@@Manlycash you interpret this wrong, Police are there to keep things calm not enforce who gets a copy of what. He raised his voice, swore most likely, undoubtedly intimidating in his behaviour. It is a civil matter between two parties (Not him his wife) and nothing to do with him hence they refuse to give him a copy and rightly so. As we cannot see what happened inside and neither can the Police at this point they are there to tell him to clear off and get his wife to get a copy. He is at fault here clearly. The words used are completely irrelevant.
@@davidwright1235 So if there were a statute or ordinance on the books that states that failure to give a copy of an agreement is a criminal offense then would you still agree? ...I also disagree that the cops calmed anything down, rather all they did was escalate the interaction into violence, and they put a lot of bystanders at risk including children that were peacefully riding their bikes, and they did this even after the man obeyed the cops order to leave the dollar store property, they asked him to come back onto the dollar store property when he was already off the property and back at his neighborhood which was right next door.
@@Manlycash trepass -if i do not want you at my place of work - because you are causing a disturbance - i can tell you to to leave - if you dont leave you are trespassing - and i can have the cops take you away - whether they give you a signed ticket or not - do not come back - you sov cits are idiots
Trespass because you are causing a disturbance and the owner wants you removed There are MANY definitions you cherry pick the one you want to use Trespass An intrusion or infringement on another. From the Collins ENGLISH dictionary trespassed past simple and past participle of trespass trespass Using the wrong dictionary and laziness is no excuse
I don't think you watched the whole video. In the video I gave the same definition of Trespass that you quoted. The point is that the cops are asking the Dollar General store manager if she wants the guy and his wife "trespassed" That makes absolutely no sense. What he means to ask the store owner is "do you want me to give the guy and his wife a warning that they are not allowed to come back to the store and that if they do they will be committing the offense of trespassing." There is no definition of trespass or trespassed that means to give a warning against returning to a property revoking implied consent to enter a retail business or other private property. Consequently it makes no sense for a cop to tell a man and his wife that "the store owner wants you trespassed."
Makes sense to me and I'm not a cop. The manager can not give him a copy of agreement between the business and his wife to him. He's no part of the agreement. To reasonable people Trespass, Trespassing, Trespassed usually means a business no longer wants you in their business. I have had many people Trespassed. No, people know exactly what the Cop needs. You are so off base about everything you said.
No actually "trespassed" means the past tense of trespass. Trespassed does not mean a business no longer wants you in their business. A cop probably just told you that one day when wanted someone off your property but there is no dictionary, or statute or ordinance that defines "trespassed" in the way you think it does, so your definition is fabricated and fraudulent. Also there is no law that forbids the husband from requesting or receiving a copy of an agreement on behalf of his wife. If you think that there is then cite the law.
It's used as a transitive verb and the cop is giving. Brief description of how, we (cops) are going to tresspaass you ( give you a warning/citation for trespassing) I also look at it like if someone says I'm going to learn you which is really saying I am going to teach you I don't know if I made any sense you let me know if I did
Ok I agree that used like this "We're going to trespass you" or "I'm going to trespass you" that could be used as a transitive verb, but nonetheless the transitive form would mean "We're going to (commit an offense against) you" because the verb trespass is defined as I stated in the video, and because the cop is referring to a person not a piece of property or land. But when you cops say "we're going to trespass you" you have in your mind a meaning or understanding that is not available to anyone but cops and that is not a known definition in the English language. Therefore, it is unreasonable for law enforcement to expect a member of the public to understand the meaning of a word that was made up by cops and that is not accepted as part of the English language or at least some codification of law. It's sort of like speaking to an English person using the Russian language as a Cop in an English speaking country. Giving commands in Russian. It would not be reasonable to do such a thing. It's like malpractice. It's offensive.
Watching again from Palawan!
You're the best!
As in the legal definition of tresspass by law in the area, they reside
There is no law statute or ordinance that defines "trespassed" in the manner that the police are using it. Trespass is a legal term.
trespassing here is refusing to leave a property once asked to leave.
its not trespassing for entering unless you have been told in the past to leave and was given an official warning whcih can only be issued once you refuse to leave as stated before. OR if they have a sign every 10ft stating no trespassing. no sign then they can only be given a warning when the cops show up, but only if they are found on the property and are refusing to leave...
as for the law, the laws define the words in the law itself, if it doesnt then and only then can the dictionary definition be used. this is how all us laws work both state and fed. like the word terrorism under the patriot act means something vastly different then what webster defines it as...
Ok I agree, but explain to me how you believe the following sentence makes actual sense either according to the dictionary definition or according to any statute or ordinance: "The owner wants YOU TRESPASSED"
Reading a dictionary term is pointless as you need to read the exact law for that place or, country or state. Trespassed meaning that he was not welcome in that place and without permission you are trespassing. Ridiculous not a scam at all. Read the law not the dictionary description. He had no right to have a copy of the agreement, only his wife could get it.
That's exactly the point, the word "trespass" is strictly a legal term. It goes back even to the Bible, it is a common law legal term. That's like saying "If you give us $100,000 dollars we will sell you this house and you will own it." But then you go to court and complain that you were defrauded and the Judge says "Sir I understand you lost your $100,000 dollars and you do not get to reside in the house that you bought, but don't you understand how stupid you are? In this county the word "Sell" means that the person you gave your money to gets to live in the house you bought, and "Own" means that you have no right to use use visit or enter the house that you bought." And then when you ask the Judge what law states this the Judge says "Sir we are sorry but there is no law that says that, that is just what you find out after you pay your money, because we all already knew that but its not written down anywhere." Hahaha.
@@Manlycash you interpret this wrong, Police are there to keep things calm not enforce who gets a copy of what. He raised his voice, swore most likely, undoubtedly intimidating in his behaviour. It is a civil matter between two parties (Not him his wife) and nothing to do with him hence they refuse to give him a copy and rightly so. As we cannot see what happened inside and neither can the Police at this point they are there to tell him to clear off and get his wife to get a copy. He is at fault here clearly. The words used are completely irrelevant.
@@davidwright1235 So if there were a statute or ordinance on the books that states that failure to give a copy of an agreement is a criminal offense then would you still agree? ...I also disagree that the cops calmed anything down, rather all they did was escalate the interaction into violence, and they put a lot of bystanders at risk including children that were peacefully riding their bikes, and they did this even after the man obeyed the cops order to leave the dollar store property, they asked him to come back onto the dollar store property when he was already off the property and back at his neighborhood which was right next door.
@@Manlycash trepass -if i do not want you at my place of work - because you are causing a disturbance - i can tell you to to leave - if you dont leave you are trespassing - and i can have the cops take you away - whether they give you a signed ticket or not - do not come back - you sov cits are idiots
Trespass because you are causing a disturbance and the owner wants you removed
There are MANY definitions you cherry pick the one you want to use
Trespass An intrusion or infringement on another.
From the Collins ENGLISH dictionary
trespassed
past simple and past participle of trespass
trespass
Using the wrong dictionary and laziness is no excuse
I don't think you watched the whole video. In the video I gave the same definition of Trespass that you quoted. The point is that the cops are asking the Dollar General store manager if she wants the guy and his wife "trespassed" That makes absolutely no sense. What he means to ask the store owner is "do you want me to give the guy and his wife a warning that they are not allowed to come back to the store and that if they do they will be committing the offense of trespassing." There is no definition of trespass or trespassed that means to give a warning against returning to a property revoking implied consent to enter a retail business or other private property. Consequently it makes no sense for a cop to tell a man and his wife that "the store owner wants you trespassed."
Makes sense to me and I'm not a cop. The manager can not give him a copy of agreement between the business and his wife to him. He's no part of the agreement. To reasonable people Trespass, Trespassing, Trespassed usually means a business no longer wants you in their business. I have had many people Trespassed. No, people know exactly what the Cop needs. You are so off base about everything you said.
No actually "trespassed" means the past tense of trespass. Trespassed does not mean a business no longer wants you in their business. A cop probably just told you that one day when wanted someone off your property but there is no dictionary, or statute or ordinance that defines "trespassed" in the way you think it does, so your definition is fabricated and fraudulent. Also there is no law that forbids the husband from requesting or receiving a copy of an agreement on behalf of his wife. If you think that there is then cite the law.