Mysterious Affair at Styles 🎧 Poirot
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 січ 2023
- The mystery begins with the death of Emily Inglethorp at Styles, a manor...See Today's Deals amzn.to/3WzUYKJ Gift Cards amzn.to/3Hlzf58 , Amazon gift cards amzn.to/3iV8ICa All for love, love for all amzn.to/3D7ueKL , amzn.to/3QWeQqu amzn.to/3wo3HFg , amzn.to/3R0fIKs
- Розваги
I love how the novel is narrated by different people. It's my favourite.
Thank you for sharing this delightful Agatha Christie story. Enjoyed this so much. Keep on sharing her books.
God bless
I'm so into these radio mystery dramas. The movies are great also.
You Tube has some good Agatha Christy ones. I just listened to Sleeping Murder. That was a good one so was After the funeral.
😊 I agree.
Philip Jackson as Japp - perfect!
Hamish macbeth
6:42
@@richardloomis6929 Not sure what you mean by that - I was pointing out that Philip Jackson was reading as Jap, which was perfect, never mentioned Hamish Macbeth.
Phillip Jackson is the actor who portrays Japp in the DVDS too
I think he's referencing the fact that Jackson did play a wild preacher condemning Hamish in one episode of the Macbeth series.
I actually prefer John Moffat for audio than David Suchet . This is strange as I am a David Suchet Poirot fan. I have audio books and CDs by both.
Agree ! Not only that but in some cases the Radio drama version of a story was better than the Suchet
TV version ! eg. Murder on the Orient Express . The TV version with Suchet was awful !!
Agree. In the audio versions I've heard, David Suchet seems to over act.
That’s funny because I prefer Wally Cox. Perhaps it’s because we have the same name. Who knows for sure?
Yes. Suchet's Belgo / French accent grew more bizarre and
mannered as time passed.
Moffat was always perfect !!
I agree with you.
I love David Suchet as Poirot. ❤
yes...his mincing steps and tidy moustache...perfection!
@@redwingblackbirdnellMMM
@@redwingblackbirdnell And yet Christie described a man with ENORMOUS mustaches. There are so many reasons to love Suchet, but adherence to the book character isn't ONE of them! Suchet's tiny mustaches had NOTHING to do with Christie's works. SMH
Thank you !!! This story is delightful !
Thank you for sharing this. It is so nice to hear what may be considered old or in the past. BUT This is calming and stress-free. No nightmares, and you did great work. Thank you for sharing.😊
@@Virgo71i😅😶🌫️😠🥵😠😤😠😮 my i😅n😮uuiyim mu😅nuummouujomuhk😅iyojnhmnyit 0:02 jy😅jui😅 u mi😅j😩😩😅t😮〽️😮mm no cukiuiihb
It’s k😅im😅i😅u😅ugimwuuik 2:11:23 uinintiuuurut 2:11:23 ikiiytinuuyuu 2:11:23 in😅 iitwultul😮updateduuvk😅😅kuiuv😅htyi😢i😅tyti😮bg gfi😅i😮tiutyi😅uzoutuiuituiuuiiwuu🎉bfftiui😮iigurwuuyuuu🆘㊗️🅰️🍧🥗🍝🍣🍚🫕😢🍱🍬🍚🍜😅w
Uo 😅mmug😊😅tr❔🅾️📵♻️❔❔kr🎉ioyyokah⚜️😮y😅 2:11:23 zh
@@phumlafuzani8082 I have absolutely no idea what that was seemingly posted by me. Thank you for bringing to my attention 👍
@@Virgo71Let me try some detective work 😅 Either the phone was in your pocket, or your toddler went to watched videos and tapped letters randomly 😂
Listening again to this and it's still a good story.
This man has the best accent I've ever heard! I LOVE these dramas.
Fabulous ❤ thank you 🙏
Glad you enjoyed it!
No ads... Great. Entertaining, even if the plot was a little convoluted.
Based on a true story.
Google "Stephen Truscott"
I grew up with radio entertainment since South Africa only got TV in the 70s. What I love is that my imagination works well in radio plays, and you can carry on with things like chores and hobbies while listening. Thank you most appreciated.
This is one of my favorites of Poirot
Great stuff, thanks.
I just discovered your channel... I love these radio shows... when was this one recorded?
Most enjoyable. Thank you.
Just found this, very enjoyable will subscribe 🙋♀️
Yeah John s audio is best! 😊
Enjoyed immensely.
The very first Agatha Christie mystery. Written in 1916 and published in 1920. It is the first of over 30 Hercule Poirot novels. Thanks for sharing.
Great story.
Excelente historias, me imaginaba yo junto con ellos en la morgue, miedo 😨, pero ahí estoy,, gracias por compartir
Sycamore trees are so messy
Would you mind passing the fish paste scones please.
Haha - hard times!
I think Moffat sounds a great deal like David Suchet on this.
Friday
1:07:00
Sometimes I find it hard to follow old stories because people are referred to by their last names, and times when multiple characters have the same last name .
Try sipping a nice cup of Twinings or Yorkshire tea from Grindley Petalware, accompanied by Walker's shortbread..you'll soon get the drift!😉
Suggestions everyone?
I would enjoy these stories a lot more if they didn't stop almost at the end I refuse to listen to any more because of it .if all movies stopped right before the end would people continue to watch them ,probably not.i don't see the difference. I'm very disappointed.
This is a radio play, and it stopped at the end of the story. They did, however, play the very beginning again.
If you say something like : "I was doing some reading in my boudoir" nowadays, people laugh at you.
That’s why most love it
This is a story when Captain Hastings Meets Poirot for the first time
This is problematic throughout this story as Agatha Christie seems to have forgotten far into the story
Captain Hastings on a spur proposes to a woman. He is a ladies man in this story as runs to any woman that invites him to walk of anything.
This continues through 2/3's of the story. Hasting is competent in this story Later he is filled with error that complicate the cases. He also is used later for comedy relief.
In a later story he would have walked away from he door or fell asleep which allows bad things to happen. The Later Hastings is not as confident and NEVER had a desire to be a detective.
Other wise Hastings would be actively doing things with Poirot. Here Hastings knows about poisons in later stories he knows nothing of poisons.
When Hastings first meets Poirot in his cottage Poirot Like Hastings says and does a number of things he never does after his character is refined
Example Poirot asks a woman to come over to visit him as Poirot is interested in this woman. Thankfully this is dropped.
Poirot has a briefcase where he has empty vials and all kinds of things, Later Poirot carries a few of these in his pockets and devices needed in various stories
Poirot solving is TIGHTENED in later stories as in this one Poirot is flailing around and gets nowhere going through an inquest, going through the trial and then on and one.
Poirot cries out in defeat, 2x's Poirot speaks he made mistakes, he speaks several times his idea of this and that person were WRONG. 2/3's in the story he mentions his little grey cells
which does not match all the bumbling and failures. This is Not Later when he can mention his little grey cells 2 and 3 times and it fits with what he does and thinks
Here Poirot tell Hastings 1 2 3 4 5 6 the later character does not do this. He repeatedly keeps a number of secrets from Hastings Modern stories he leaves one thing out or keeps one thing secret
Detective Jap is far more in character so this is made obvious in their first scene he does NOT KNOW Poirot. So it is inexplicable that jap lets Poirot dig around and touch evidence. Jap is standoffish to Poirot carrying he does not personally know him. So this is carried in this story.
Then in the last bit Jap says Poirot has saved him again. Meaning Poirot who has just come into the country has worked with jap repeatedly Later Christie writes in that Jap as a young inspector in Scotland was dispatched for it sounds like a few years working with Poirot on a number of cases Plural. One is mentioned. This was a later development and a good one That a good writer trying to break in could write some of those stories in prewar Belgium. For which one would have to know period customs and these Prewar European countries. And entire series of books could be written as the COPYRIGHT for Poirot is going to end so he Jap Hastings can all be used.
When this was made for television the Actor David Suchet a lot of this extraneously removed On TV. Poirot's bumbling his cries of despair, his saying he was wrong on things, declaring he made mistakes are all gone. Watch the episode after listening to this so you are familiar with this and you will be able to pick out glaring errors and dozens of FLAWS in the radio version
Captain Hastings does not meet Poirot for the first time in this book, he already knows him, and meets up again in this book.
Agatha Christy in more than one full book Fudges her Time Line and Facts.
Here is this novel this is from what is written the first meeting of Captain Hastings and Preriot.
When she later writes in changes that does not change what she wrote here.
Along with Inspector Jap years later Christy makes a change that Jap was send to Belgium and she writes then hints of cases they worked together.
But in an earlier Novel Jap first meets Preriot in England.
we have seen in this novel Christy forgot what she wrote earlier and changes this in this novel.
Listen Carefully and now knowing Christy made a significant change to this plot. You will now see it.
This does not mean she was not a brilliant writer but she DID NOT KEEP TRACK of what she wrote here and in a number of later Novels where she changes things for CONVIENIENCE of the New Story.
As a writer and screenplay writer i hear writings different than FANS. Who willing excuse mentality anything that would show something bad about the writer they adore.
An interesting story, but not original.
This is not-too-losely based on the original case of a fourteen-year-old boy, Stephen Truscott, who was wrongly convicted of raping and murdering twelve-year-old Lynn Harper in 1959.
The location was in the vicinity of the RCAF Station Clinton, Ontario, Canada.
Stephen was sentenced to death by hanging, but later commuted to life imprisonment.
It was not until the year 2007 that his conviction was overturned!
Stephen Truscott is now 78 years old.
This was written in 1916 ! It's a completely different story!
The stories don’t seem at all the same to me. This was the poisoning of an elderly lady by her husband who conspired with his cousin to commit the murder.
Published 1920 - I don't think so lol 😊
Considering Agatha Christie wrote this book in 1916, and it was published in 1920, how can it be based on a murder that happened 43 years after she wrote it?
You seem confused
At the inquest, during Ingalthorpe's testimony, the audiences reaction is too funny. Ive watched all poirot's episodes and its nice to listen to the play. The inspector japp from the series is also here 😄