Many millions around the world heard on 11/22/63 what the Zapruder film depicted on 3/6/75 to many millions- President Kennedy was struck in the right temple.
Some really early statements, too early to be spun. Makes a great case for those of us who have doubts about what they later told us. Great sequence Vince!❤
Many millions around the world heard on 11/22/63 what the Zapruder film depicted on 3/6/75 to many millions- President Kennedy was struck in the right temple.
Vince, is there an explanation as to why the exit wound isn't apparent on the Zapruder film, given the Parkland Doctors' statements as to where the exit wound was located?
@@paulefisher I think it's a video with Robert Groden and his wife that has a view of the wound in the back of JFK'S head. I have watched so many, I am not sure, but I am pretty sure. Hope I'm right. Please let me know, because I would like to see it again.
Yes Vince The initial stories were they were looking for the gunman near the tracks, parking lot and that he was shot from the front. Quickly those stories were overtaken by we have LHO, the Commie assassin and the gun, i mean guns, i mean gun , i mean the revolver, no automatic, Did we mention that he shot a police officer? Keep it up Vince, still so much more to this horrific tragedy. Maybe a video focusing on the change of tune. Thanks again
Well....the opposite is often the case when reporters rushing to get anything out. That is the argument that they are going to use that initial reports (such as a Mauser being found) were simply rushed and mistaken. We had early reports of automatic (machine gun?) fire as well. So many mistakes often happened in the chaos.
Actually, a 7.65 Argentine carbine (Mauser) was the first of 3 rifles fount in, or on the TSBD. It's known as a 7.65 Argentine, because Mauser licensed it to Argentina, and only available as a carbine. A British Enfield .303 was fount on the roof of the TSBD. There was of course, the 6.5 Manlicher Carcano. Also a .30-06 casing was fount on the roof of the County Records building
@@barto4678The Argentine Mauser is a theory because the rifle found was said to be stamped with the word "Mauser' of which only the Argentine model is thought to have that stamp on it. Affidavits were sworn that the Mauser was found so I tend to believe it was.
Vince, do you know why the SS Agent in the backseat of the follow up car was sitting on the floor and would pop his head up occasionally? It doesn’t make sense to me….
Dear Vince, your latest book is outstanding. I refer to it and re-read sections when I want to know something Question ? Did the Mayor of Dallas ever give a reason for changing the motorcade route?
He was facing down in the film. How could of it come from the nole, if it entered the fore head and excited the lower back of the head? To me that would only be plausible if he was facing the nole.
I remember when i first saw the zapruda film... up to that point i though LHO shot kennedy... once seeing film i knew kill shot was not from behind, it did not look correct and still does not
This seems to be solid reporting that the bullet struck the right forehead. I guess Posner and Bugliosi somehow missed this important information that contradicts their viewpoint 😄😅🙃
Yes, incredibly solid reporting from someone who had not seen the president, who reported what a doctor who did not perform an autopsy said, and gave a completely vague summation as to the path of the bullet. Gosh, you guys will just bite at any bait.
@@alwagner9722 being able to distinguish the fact that people can't determine the direction of a bullet simply by someone giving second hand information, minutes after the victim expired has absolutely nothing to do with having or not having admiration for any government body or specific people. If that's all it took, there would've been no need for any further autopsy or investigation. But you know that, right?
@@franclin0 perhaps. But admiration or not, you apparently have a lot of faith in a government appointed commission. With a century of lies and deception by the US government, I certainly do not. You underestimate the people. We certainly can determine the direction of the bullet that killed JFK, whether it's second hand or other. Initial reports on major events like this, the OKC bombing or 9/11 are usually correct and then, within a day or two, stopped and changed. These are some of the reasons why the majority of people don't trust the US government or their appointed commissions...JFK and the 9/11 commission. Both set up to cover up. Believe what you want.
@@franclin0 perhaps. But admiration or not, you've got a lot of faith in a government appointed commission. I certainly don't. Also, initial reports in major events like this and others, tend to be accurate, then within a day or two, they're stopped and changed accordingly. This is where the cover up(s) begin.
This was NO single act: no "lone nut" operation, with only one individual doing it all.. (& that individual being Oswald). There had to have been at least 5-6 gunmen firing from the front and rear, and in triangular pattern. Myself, I'm convinced that Oswald's rifle was stolen, and used in the shooting; but was only used as a prop firing blanks, due to its age and inaccuracy; this would've been done to provide sight/sound cover for at least 2 to 3 snipers firing adjacent to the TSBD, from either or both the DalTex and Courthouse buildings, as depicted in the 1973 film "Executive Action", and Oliver Stone's JFK; and these snipers would've used weapons fitted with silencers. It's also logical to believe the snipers practiced on moving targets out in isolated areas (namely the desert, as depicted in Executive Action), and that they additionally studied the area of Dealey Plaza: they would've noticed the area was, or could be, affected "acoustically". There is also just the possibility that some, or part of that had leaked out. Also, l for one am inclined to believe there was another sniper firing from the storm drain, down on Elm St (as was presented in the follow-up sequel to TMWKK, entitled: "The Truth Will Set You Free"); assuming the storm drain was fairly/easily accessible, and allowed a clear close-up aim/shot, a sniper in that location would've used a pistol with a silencer (as opposed to a rifle), and afterward had ample time & opportunity to escape ...without being noticed nor with any observation whatsoever. In any case, Oswald, clearly, was set up as the "patsy," in addition to being "sheepdipped" (meaning framed, or "set up") as a communist, when he was not. Just a $0.02 theory.
The story of the rifle is interesting. When you boil it down, there's nothing that connects that rifle to Oswald more than an easily forgeable receipt without Oswald's name on it, and an empty blanket in Ruth's garage.
@ghostdance56 Unless you have already seen it, l strongly recommend watching the 1988 British documentary series "The Men Who Killed Kennedy", particularly Ch.4 "the Patsy"...this alone by itself, is an eye-opener, if there every was one, with several points of "food for thought", so-to-speak: 1): The brown paper bag/wrapping that Oswald allegedly used to conceal his rifle (the 6.5 mm Mannlicher-Carcano) was too short in length; furthermore, the rifle was oily & greasy and no stains were on the paper itself. 2): Wesley Frazier, Oswalds' coworker who he rode in with, stated the package he saw (which was said to have contained curtain rods) was roughly 2ft in length and was folded over. Frazier was never called to testify to the Warren Commission as to what he saw. 3): The mortician who prepared Oswald's body stated that "agents" arrived during the procedure and afterward, fingerprinting ink had to be removed from Oswald's palms & fingers (obviously before these were later "found" on the rifle).
@@waistgunner3930 - Frazer said from day one this 'package' wasn't large enough to contain a rifle. But thats only part of the story. Frazer published his autobiography about two years ago, and in it he tells about a summer job he had "wrapping curtains and curtain rods" for a department store. Can't make this stuff up. So we know where the 'rifle in a bag' story came from. Frazer was the first arrested and accused of murdering the President that day. He was deathly afraid of being accused of being Oswald's accomplice or worse, so he'd have said anything he was told to say if it saved his butt. Frazer's mother said Oswald had no large bag that morning. The loading dock foreman SAW Oswald enter the building that morning carrying NO bag. No one inside that busy building saw Oswald carrying a large bag. Conclusion? There never was any freakin paper or bag besides Oswald's lunch bag in his pocket. Guess what rifle was found on the roof? You can still find the WFAA footage of it being lowered from the roof. It's the SAME model rifle DPD claimed they found in Frazer's closet. Unlike the Carcano, the Lee Enfield would have been a good choice of rifle for assassination. Motorcycle patrolman Baker said he approached the TSBD because he believed someone shot from the roof. Coincidence? I doubt it. .
@@JohnJohnson-pq4qz - I came across just the video snippet again recently, I think in the documentary JFK Revisited or was it Groden on America's Untold Stories. But I used to see more of the report fairly regularly for years until the deep state managed to scrub it. But that coverage exists as a million people would attest to because we remember it. I believe Connally's wounds line up with a shot from the 'southwest' side of TSBD, the roof being a good bet, which makes a rifle up there all the more plausible. For me the oddity is that Frazer had the exact same rifle in his closet according to the Police. Thats sets off a spidey sense, like so much else in this case. .
I’m amazed how this video has all but been ignored. Considering it was given immediately after JFK died..
Some really early statements, too early to be spun. Makes a great case for those of us who have doubts about what they later told us. Great sequence Vince!❤
VP GOAT. Thank you Vince
" It's a simple matter, really........"
Many millions around the world heard on 11/22/63 what the Zapruder film depicted on 3/6/75 to many millions- President Kennedy was struck in the right temple.
The south knoll? That's what it sounds like to me.
Gracias excelente
Vince, is there an explanation as to why the exit wound isn't apparent on the Zapruder film, given the Parkland Doctors' statements as to where the exit wound was located?
@@paulefisher I think it's a video with Robert Groden and his wife that has a view of the wound in the back of JFK'S head. I have watched so many, I am not sure, but I am pretty sure. Hope I'm right. Please let me know, because I would like to see it again.
@@paulefisher yes- it is very dark on the back of the head on the film.
Thank you Vince!
❤The truth has no agenda ❤
Yes Vince
The initial stories were they were looking for the gunman near the tracks, parking lot and that he was shot from the front.
Quickly those stories were overtaken by we have LHO, the Commie assassin and the gun, i mean guns, i mean gun , i mean the revolver, no automatic, Did we mention that he shot a police officer?
Keep it up Vince, still so much more to this horrific tragedy.
Maybe a video focusing on the change of tune.
Thanks again
Like the late Jim Marrs said, the most accurate reporting is immediately following the incident. These folks know what they saw
Ditto, Mary Ferrell!
Well....the opposite is often the case when reporters rushing to get anything out. That is the argument that they are going to use that initial reports (such as a Mauser being found) were simply rushed and mistaken. We had early reports of automatic (machine gun?) fire as well. So many mistakes often happened in the chaos.
Actually, a 7.65 Argentine carbine (Mauser) was the first of 3 rifles fount in, or on the TSBD. It's known as a 7.65 Argentine, because Mauser licensed it to Argentina, and only available as a carbine. A British Enfield .303 was fount on the roof of the TSBD. There was of course, the 6.5 Manlicher Carcano. Also a .30-06 casing was fount on the roof of the County Records building
@@barto4678The Argentine Mauser is a theory because the rifle found was said to be stamped with the word "Mauser' of which only the Argentine model is thought to have that stamp on it. Affidavits were sworn that the Mauser was found so I tend to believe it was.
John, did you read and comprehend what I typed?
People think John came in with a clean face, in fact he was a bloody mess, easy to miss a 5 mm tiny hole in his hair
Where is it stated his face was bloody?
Vince, do you know why the SS Agent in the backseat of the follow up car was sitting on the floor and would pop his head up occasionally? It doesn’t make sense to me….
JUST LIKE JAMES SUTTON FILES STATED!
Dear Vince, your latest book is outstanding. I refer to it and re-read sections when I want to know something Question ? Did the Mayor of Dallas ever give a reason for changing the motorcade route?
Thanks! No-never.
Look at the blood/tissue pattern. Was the blood sprayed to the inside of the front window or to the trunk of the car…
Through the thick hair / hairline
nice
He was facing down in the film. How could of it come from the nole, if it entered the fore head and excited the lower back of the head? To me that would only be plausible if he was facing the nole.
I remember when i first saw the zapruda film... up to that point i though LHO shot kennedy... once seeing film i knew kill shot was not from behind, it did not look correct and still does not
The single bulshit theory has no place
This seems to be solid reporting that the bullet struck the right forehead. I guess Posner and Bugliosi somehow missed this important information that contradicts their viewpoint 😄😅🙃
Yes, incredibly solid reporting from someone who had not seen the president, who reported what a doctor who did not perform an autopsy said, and gave a completely vague summation as to the path of the bullet. Gosh, you guys will just bite at any bait.
@@franclin0I guess so. Must drive you debunkers crazy. You must have a deep admiration for your government and the members of the Warren Commission?
@@alwagner9722 being able to distinguish the fact that people can't determine the direction of a bullet simply by someone giving second hand information, minutes after the victim expired has absolutely nothing to do with having or not having admiration for any government body or specific people. If that's all it took, there would've been no need for any further autopsy or investigation. But you know that, right?
@@franclin0 perhaps. But admiration or not, you apparently have a lot of faith in a government appointed commission.
With a century of lies and deception by the US government, I certainly do not.
You underestimate the people. We certainly can determine the direction of the bullet that killed JFK, whether it's second hand or other.
Initial reports on major events like this,
the OKC bombing or 9/11 are usually correct and then, within a day or two, stopped and changed.
These are some of the reasons why the majority of people don't trust the US government or their appointed commissions...JFK and the 9/11 commission. Both set up to cover up.
Believe what you want.
@@franclin0 perhaps. But admiration or not, you've got a lot of faith in a government appointed commission. I certainly don't.
Also, initial reports in major events like this and others, tend to be accurate, then within a day or two, they're stopped and changed accordingly. This is where the cover up(s)
begin.
This was NO single act: no "lone nut" operation, with only one individual doing it all.. (& that individual being Oswald). There had to have been at least 5-6 gunmen firing from the front and rear, and in triangular pattern.
Myself, I'm convinced that Oswald's rifle was stolen, and used in the shooting; but was only used as a prop firing blanks, due to its age and inaccuracy; this would've been done to provide sight/sound cover for at least 2 to 3 snipers firing adjacent to the TSBD, from either or both the DalTex and Courthouse buildings, as depicted in the 1973 film "Executive Action", and Oliver Stone's JFK; and these snipers would've used weapons fitted with silencers. It's also logical to believe the snipers practiced on moving targets out in isolated areas (namely the desert, as depicted in Executive Action), and that they additionally studied the area of Dealey Plaza: they would've noticed the area was, or could be, affected "acoustically". There is also just the possibility that some, or part of that had leaked out.
Also, l for one am inclined to believe there was another sniper firing from the storm drain, down on Elm St (as was presented in the follow-up sequel to TMWKK, entitled: "The Truth Will Set You Free"); assuming the storm drain was fairly/easily accessible, and allowed a clear close-up aim/shot, a sniper in that location would've used a pistol with a silencer (as opposed to a rifle), and afterward had ample time & opportunity to escape ...without being noticed nor with any observation whatsoever.
In any case, Oswald, clearly, was set up as the "patsy," in addition to being "sheepdipped" (meaning framed, or "set up") as a communist, when he was not.
Just a $0.02 theory.
The story of the rifle is interesting. When you boil it down, there's nothing that connects that rifle to Oswald more than an easily forgeable receipt without Oswald's name on it, and an empty blanket in Ruth's garage.
@ghostdance56 Unless you have already seen it, l strongly recommend watching the 1988 British documentary series "The Men Who Killed Kennedy", particularly Ch.4 "the Patsy"...this alone by itself, is an eye-opener, if there every was one, with several points of "food for thought", so-to-speak:
1): The brown paper bag/wrapping that Oswald allegedly used to conceal his rifle (the 6.5 mm Mannlicher-Carcano) was too short in length; furthermore, the rifle was oily & greasy and no stains were on the paper itself.
2): Wesley Frazier, Oswalds' coworker who he rode in with, stated the package he saw (which was said to have contained curtain rods) was roughly 2ft in length and was folded over. Frazier was never called to testify to the Warren Commission as to what he saw.
3): The mortician who prepared Oswald's body stated that "agents" arrived during the procedure and afterward, fingerprinting ink had to be removed from Oswald's palms & fingers (obviously before these were later "found" on the rifle).
@@waistgunner3930 - Frazer said from day one this 'package' wasn't large enough to contain a rifle.
But thats only part of the story. Frazer published his autobiography about two years ago, and in it he tells about a summer job he had "wrapping curtains and curtain rods" for a department store.
Can't make this stuff up. So we know where the 'rifle in a bag' story came from.
Frazer was the first arrested and accused of murdering the President that day. He was deathly afraid of being accused of being Oswald's accomplice or worse, so he'd have said anything he was told to say if it saved his butt.
Frazer's mother said Oswald had no large bag that morning. The loading dock foreman SAW Oswald enter the building that morning carrying NO bag. No one inside that busy building saw Oswald carrying a large bag.
Conclusion? There never was any freakin paper or bag besides Oswald's lunch bag in his pocket.
Guess what rifle was found on the roof? You can still find the WFAA footage of it being lowered from the roof. It's the SAME model rifle DPD claimed they found in Frazer's closet. Unlike the Carcano, the Lee Enfield would have been a good choice of rifle for assassination.
Motorcycle patrolman Baker said he approached the TSBD because he believed someone shot from the roof.
Coincidence? I doubt it.
.
@@ghostdance56Where can we see this complete WFAA footage? I have only seen the snipet and the still photo shown in Groden's book.
@@JohnJohnson-pq4qz - I came across just the video snippet again recently, I think in the documentary JFK Revisited or was it Groden on America's Untold Stories. But I used to see more of the report fairly regularly for years until the deep state managed to scrub it.
But that coverage exists as a million people would attest to because we remember it.
I believe Connally's wounds line up with a shot from the 'southwest' side of TSBD, the roof being a good bet, which makes a rifle up there all the more plausible.
For me the oddity is that Frazer had the exact same rifle in his closet according to the Police. Thats sets off a spidey sense, like so much else in this case.
.