I have ADHD so I find most other UCAT tutorials difficult to watch, because they're always so long and full of waffle. Your videos however are concise and easy to follow. I watched this on 2x speed and still understood everything fine. This has helped me a lot. Thanks!
That means so much to me ! Thank you very much , I am very glad you have been able to absorb content from my videos !! It will only encourage me to make more :)
Thank you so much for this! Am going to start this method tomorrow and hoping it pays off! It certainly was helping me as I was following you go through the questions! :)
Hi Sir, would that be okay if you do more practice questions about this syllogism and interpreting information in decision making. I found this very helpful.
Oh my - I genuinely hope it helps - my advice to you would be to get used to writing short hand form notes - or even replacing key words with symbols BASICALLY modern day hieroglyphics (like the arrow method)
I feel like this would work for the shorter statements given but could you possibly make a video where you go through this method in the longer statements? Thanks!
Hey, sorry I didn’t understand what you meant by shorter statements (as they all have to be a max of 47 lines) , this just to provide some structure and get you started off !
@@MedicHero Apologies. I meant to say that maybe this method would be difficult to follow with the longer syllogism questions that have 3 or more lines of information. I may be wrong but it would be very helpful if you could possibly go through the more extended description syllogisms using this method. Thanks!
Sorry my bad , UA-cam glitched and showed this comment under another video instead the personal statement video so I was confused 😭😭😭wait let me te read the comment again now
I agree that drawing for DM is a great idea. That said for the example near the end about no doctor is anaemic and many vegetarians become anaemic, the last three questions did not necessarily need a diagram, they are very straightforward. I am not sure if you even resorted using the diagram as you were mostly reasoning out verbally. With regards to the second question 'some vegetarians are doctors' @9:09 Why can't the answer be 'Yes'? There can be doctors who are doctors but not anaemic since the statement says 'many vegetarians' but not 'all vegetarians are anaemic'. I don't think you actually used the diagram to solve the questions too.
Hi please could you clarify something? Throughout my practise questions on different platforms medentry/medify/tutoring each give a different answer to this question. If the stem says i.e. "Chris likes all mountains" and one of the options are "Chris likes some mountains" yes/no What would the answer be? My tutor said it would be yes because it IS true that he likes some mountains but the explanation on medentry states that it does not follow because the stem said 'all'. PLEASE HELP :(
The definition given by UCAT for 'some' is 'An undetermined number being more than one but less than all. A part of it, not all of it' therefore Medentry is right
@@yosifrasoul5754 thanks. Its very confusing because this completely contradicts Medify and Medic mind. They say if 'All' then must also be some (not not vice versa obviously).
There 'could' be vegetarians who are doctors but we don't know that for sure. maybe all the non-anaemic vegetarians just don't want to be doctors. hence the statement cannot be concluded
Logically, yes some vegetarians "could" be Doctors. However, with the UCAT, you cannot assume or rely on the probability of this being true. If you cannot draw a solid conclusion from the statement, then the statement is false. :)
I have ADHD so I find most other UCAT tutorials difficult to watch, because they're always so long and full of waffle. Your videos however are concise and easy to follow. I watched this on 2x speed and still understood everything fine. This has helped me a lot. Thanks!
That means so much to me ! Thank you very much , I am very glad you have been able to absorb content from my videos !! It will only encourage me to make more :)
thankyou for this easy and simple video. very good method for syllogisms
Who even makes these scenarios though 😆 🤣 they become ridiculous day by day. Btw amazing video, found it just in time 🤌
frrr lolll
Great explanation, so painstakingly prepared just to help others. God bless
you have changed the game !!!
This was really helpful, thank you
I am really glad it helped !!!
Thank you so much for this! Am going to start this method tomorrow and hoping it pays off! It certainly was helping me as I was following you go through the questions! :)
how did it go
Thanks for the tutorial !
Happy to help!
Jazakallah brother
Thanks so much for this. Very very helpful. God bless
no worries ! really glad it helped ! :)
DONT STOP MAKING VIDS
Btw such a good method of shorthand
that makes it so much simpler ughhh thank u
No worries !!! ☺️
Hi Sir, would that be okay if you do more practice questions about this syllogism and interpreting information in decision making. I found this very helpful.
i have aphantasia so i hope this improves my scores
Oh my - I genuinely hope it helps - my advice to you would be to get used to writing short hand form notes - or even replacing key words with symbols BASICALLY modern day hieroglyphics (like the arrow method)
@@MedicHero Do you, or people in general usually use their mind when doing the UCAT? I want to know how disadvantaged I am
could “most” be considered as the second arrow?
I feel like this would work for the shorter statements given but could you possibly make a video where you go through this method in the longer statements? Thanks!
Hey, sorry I didn’t understand what you meant by shorter statements (as they all have to be a max of 47 lines) , this just to provide some structure and get you started off !
If you tell me what you mean , I’ll definitely look into it
@@MedicHero Apologies. I meant to say that maybe this method would be difficult to follow with the longer syllogism questions that have 3 or more lines of information. I may be wrong but it would be very helpful if you could possibly go through the more extended description syllogisms using this method. Thanks!
Sorry my bad , UA-cam glitched and showed this comment under another video instead the personal statement video so I was confused 😭😭😭wait let me te read the comment again now
Yeah sure I can of course look into longer syllogisms as well !!
What about the word only?
How does the first conclusion not follow but the second does 😖 its what’s losing me so many marks in DM
Which one ? No doctor is vegetarian the answer is no because it dosent say in the passage that doctors are vegetarians
I agree that drawing for DM is a great idea. That said for the example near the end about no doctor is anaemic and many vegetarians become anaemic, the last three questions did not necessarily need a diagram, they are very straightforward. I am not sure if you even resorted using the diagram as you were mostly reasoning out verbally. With regards to the second question 'some vegetarians are doctors' @9:09 Why can't the answer be 'Yes'? There can be doctors who are doctors but not anaemic since the statement says 'many vegetarians' but not 'all vegetarians are anaemic'. I don't think you actually used the diagram to solve the questions too.
I feel sorry for the anaemic vegetarians now
Same here man
Hi please could you clarify something?
Throughout my practise questions on different platforms medentry/medify/tutoring each give a different answer to this question.
If the stem says i.e. "Chris likes all mountains"
and one of the options are "Chris likes some mountains" yes/no
What would the answer be? My tutor said it would be yes because it IS true that he likes some mountains but the explanation on medentry states that it does not follow because the stem said 'all'.
PLEASE HELP :(
The definition given by UCAT for 'some' is 'An undetermined number being more than one but less than all. A part of it, not all of it' therefore Medentry is right
@@yosifrasoul5754 thanks. Its very confusing because this completely contradicts Medify and Medic mind. They say if 'All' then must also be some (not not vice versa obviously).
I have mine in 5 days pray for me 😩
أَن يَشَاءَ اللَّهُ, all will be well !!
did it go well
@@Akira12364 I got 2600 so not really lmaoo
Can't vegetarians be doctors as only some vegetarians are anemic therefore the non anemic vegetarians can be doctors
There 'could' be vegetarians who are doctors but we don't know that for sure. maybe all the non-anaemic vegetarians just don't want to be doctors. hence the statement cannot be concluded
Logically, yes some vegetarians "could" be Doctors. However, with the UCAT, you cannot assume or rely on the probability of this being true. If you cannot draw a solid conclusion from the statement, then the statement is false. :)
ngl i dont think its useful
yeahcuz u cant do this for the longer syllogisms man
Can't stand you saying singers