the higher up they put the screen with out it getting in your line of sight the better has been proven .I guess he hates head up displays too . The idea is to keep your eyes on the road not looking down at a display low down on the dash .
@@softwareengineer6702 okay but lets be real here... if you can afford a Mercedes you most likely arent going to have a 5 to 10 year old version of that car. Also there are quite a few companies that manufacture and fit updated/aftermarket versions for those oldhat head units.
This video is now over four years old, and I feel like OEMs watched this and decided to double down on all of these ridiculous trends, and then add in a few more for good measure.
Four years later and nothing has changed for the better. I will resist like crazy to get a new car that doesn't have a physical button for volume and heat/cold.
Well, the Globalist agenda calls for more artificial trends, push for EV and the minimization of personal property ownership. It's all by design to excerpt control over people.
The tacked on screens is fine because when those screens inevitably fail, it should be easier/cheaper to replace than ripping the entire dash apart… in theory.
@@jesustsa1 It's a cheap alternative. All the cheap quality cars have tacked-on screens. The luxury or great quality vehicles have integrated screens. On top of that, there are not physical buttons. Another cheap alternatives. Before Ford's excuse was the great motor, but now that motor has a locked ECU. It's a terrible buy compared to the S550. And it's uglier. It's the Mustang II all over again.
Absolutely true. But it has 3 advantages for the manufacturer: it costs less than all the buttons, small cogwheels and cables. Then can be used in all the cars models. And finally it is "fashion" for common people who in the majority want useless but shiny gimmicks on a tablet like device, then it's good for marketing. The end result it is a disaster for the customer: unreliable and a nightmare to use. But who cares, the car manufacturer is happy because it costs less, and the customer has a useless colorful toy to play with.
Agree, I’ve never got why everyone was so excited about Tesla’s big iPad, like really? Is that the future?? It seems like everyone forgot real buttons give you touch feedback so you don’t have to take your eyes from the road!
The thing with knobs and buttons is that you can feel it while keeping your eyes on the road. With a touchscreen, you only feel the screen, not the actual button
"We have a 1,5 liter, 3-cylinder, turbocharged engine but for some reason it sound shit." "Let's put some supercar noises on speakers! That'll fix it." *Employee of the month*
This. How is it that iPhones have had a buttery smooth interface for over a decade yet new cars still have touchscreens that lag and dont respond immediately.
agree completely. I just bought an '05 Honda Accord Euro, and whilst I do need to set it up to connect my phone to the stereo system, I just love that all the buttons are still physical. So much easier to select, you know when you've hit them properly, and you don't end up with greasy fingerprints all over the screen...
agree. Ive got an aging car 2009. I can reach out my left hand in pitch-black darkness and muscle memory can land it on the large round knob in the center of the dash that controls volume.Else I can work out the orientation of the steering wheel and the location of the volume buttons mounted on it. For most Australian States just touching your phone is a license loss offense. I'm OK with that. But new cars that Android Auto and Apple Carplay can display the whole phone screen are on that big 8" touch screen in the dash Is that touchable or not?. I'm betting not if the police officer involved is behind on his quota for the day Difficult to police because near new cars has settings which must be completed. Turned on or Off in a Tickbox format on those 8" screens. But for the law, Am I turning the ABS on or dialing a phone contact? And if you can't touch that dash-mounted screen, where does that leave the owners of Tesla's where a lot of vital information and settings are displayed/set on that big 11" landscape screen. I think someone should give the road rules authors a quick tour on how modern cars work. They are living back in the era of 1din push-button car radios with an Antenna on the back fender that rises or stows as you turn the device on or off
Headlights that blind other motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. And I'm not talking about improperly installed and aimed aftermarket LEDs and HIDs ..., they're coming straight from the factories with headlights that can illuminate everything for miles. Good only for the driver while everyone else is left temporarily blinded with disability glare. And, it's not about not staring at them ..., they are unavoidable and makes you take your eyes slightly or more off of the road that you are supposed to be looking at while driving in order to avoid an accident.
I keep thinking who is that idiot with high beams on blinding me only to realise its another SUV with dipped beams brighter than the sun and pointing straight into my eyeballs because of the SUVs height.
One of those cars is the Corolla, and I had an owner telling me that on lowbeam the visibility isnt that good, even tho oncoming traffic where flashing highs at him!!
The loss of a real spare tire or even a temporary spare ( Doughnut) in favor of that crappy tire repair kit. I believe all these changes are designed to force you back to the dealership when this crap breaks
I see where you're coming from but realistically many people won't cha get the tire themselves (some can't because of health issues, others don't want to be hit by a car, get filthy sweaty or rained on), and they take alot space that could add to cargo space.
For literally no reason. Half the car is made of plastic and comes will extra crap like a touch screen radio and paddle shifters on an automatic? I'll just get a used car and save 40 grand.
when you will see the list of people who designed, engineered, assamble it... this is they salary. + prices of a car doesn't worry me, the unreliability of them and paying that capitalistic shit worries me...
One thing that absolutely infuriates me is the response time of the infotainment systems in practically all of the cars. Our phones are lightning fast, it reacts instantly to the touch. For some reason, systems in cars where everything is suddenly a screen take 100-200ms to respond to a touch - an enviroment where its critical that you dont take your eyes off the road for longer then absolutely necessary.. What is it with the tech? Are they using CPUs from 1995?
I wouldn't be surprised if you weren't far off the mark, often the SoC:s chosen for these applications are magnitudes slower than the ones used in modern smartphones despite the car having an expected life of 15-20 years. And this despite far more capable chips often only costing a few dollar more. It's just such a bloody stupid way of saving money while giving the costumer a far worse experience for the lifetime of the car. Luckily it's getting better, thanks both to costumer expectations and more readily available technology. It's still really bad, but at least it's now approaching workable.
Tbh that made sense some years ago because cars have a much longer developement time than normal consumer electronics, so when they come out the infotanment systems are already outdated; nowadays however they have no excuse since phones from 3-4 years ago were already pretty quick
The center screen in my Tesla Model 3 is just as responsive as my Galaxy phone, I was pleasantly surprised compared to the old infotainment screens of my old ICE cars.
How's your phone from 2-3 years ago? That's the tech that gets into cars, because of development time. The good systems for response are all that "stuck on" design because it's the easiest to get with the latest technology. Imagine designing an entire car interior around a screen today, and 2 years when the car is released to the public, the marketing department says it needs to be faster, brighter, bigger etc. Now you have to re-form the dash, causing huge production delays or just stick it on top and fill in the dead space. Tacked on in the end anyways.
it's amazing, here we are, one year after the release of this video, and there are apparently 11,000 people who enjoy fake exhaust tips, fake vents, motorized door handles, synthesized engine sounds, piano black trim, and screens glued on their dashboards.
Amazing observation. I never would’ve realized this video had so many dislikes if you hadn’t pointed it out. However, I guess when you think of how stupid people are, it becomes kind of obvious. As Scott said, car manufacturers are not doing this for fun, they’re doing it to appease the public.
I can kinda see where they're coming from. This guy is complaining about all sorts of trivial things like black trims, door handles, wheels etc. which are purely subjective. Let people enjoy what they want. While I agree that he makes a good point regarding the faux exhaust tips and engine noises, he kinda comes off as a boomer who doesn't want to embrace modern design and technology. But hey that's just me.
@@sinuslebastian6366 boomers are just older versions of what millennials are now. In other words the exact same people …but with more wisdom. If “embracing modern technology” means fat infotainment screens then maybe he has a point.
@@sinuslebastian6366 i agree with u. Most of his complains are trivial things. I do agree on some things like no physicial buttons but mostly I don't really care about his complains. Remember this is capitalism. Consumers demanded most of the feature that he complained. I personally think fake exhaust and vent looks good even though it serves no purpose. Fake engine noise doesn't bother me. Big rims look good to me. Electronic door handles look good to me too.
Getting stuck on the side of a lonely road with no spare tire. The kits they provide instead are often not effective. I like a trusted spare in those moments.
Those fix flat kits also ruin the TPMS sensor and make the tire impossible to be patched, if it would have been possible. So now instead of a $20 patch, you're spending $80 for a new sensor and $150 for a new tire.
Knicole Edwards I always carry a tyre repair kit even though I have a spare tyre. Australia is a big place. It can be easier repairing a tyre still on the car than changing it. And I dont mean goop / slime. Btw, O know someone who used goop 5 times on the one tyre over several years and it worked just fine. Ive used it just fine. TPMs maybe one of those modern things we could do without - didn't need it 10 years ago.
@@nordic5490 TPMS saves lives. The death toll caused by severe underinflation (which isn't very easy to spot in most tires until it's dangerously low) was huge. If you stay on top of your tires, then yeah, you don't need it. I'm a car head and I have a compressor at home, but I like TPMS.
The tire kits some manufacturers offer are a double edge sword. There are rare situation where inflating a tire temporarily just to get to a safe situation is key. I'd hate for a loved one of mine to have to be on the side of a dark road trying to change a tire or waiting for hours for road side assistance... Where in five minutes, they could inflate it and drive off.... Yes I know everything can't be quick fixed.
Trends in transmissions. CVT's, CVT's that pretend to multi-gear automatics, automatics with 25 gear ranges that can't figure out which gear to use. DCT's that aren't reliable.
Well, yes. A class defined as "vehicles with less X than ours". But they want you to think it's defined as "vehicles with a similar market position and overall design as ours".
Can we please get a sedan or hatchback with best in class ground clearnce? I would consider actually buying one but every year they get lower and lower.
Four more things: SUV Everything. No idea why every freakin' car has to be jacked up nowadays, but it has turned into an outright war on physics and sanitiy. Especially ridoculous here in europe where nowadays even tiny hatchbacks for the city are jacked up. The second relates to several of the things you mentioned. Every vehicle has to be "sporty". Started with the luxury sedan market in the 90's but now every car truck and minivan is "sporty". Meaning fake grills, huge wheels, a billion unnecessary horsepower, noisy exhaust, uncomfortable seats and a shitty ride. it's just plain stupid and it ruins every other aspect of a vehicle for something that is neither attainable nor desirable. Third is the constant rise of what car designers refer to as the beltline (the line seperating the body from the windows) by now in normal cars they have reached shoulder height. first it felt like sitting in a bathtub. by now they have reached the point where it feels like sitting in a bunker. And last but not least. unnecessary electronics on everything. a power window used to be a switch and a motor and it worked completely fine, but now the switch is wired to the door unit which only works when it is connected to the gazillion other units via canbus. you want to change temperature - you have to get into the climate menu on your touchscreen. you want to get a new radio because in 5 years the one you have won't connect to your phone - well too bad. And you know fully well that in 10 years the plastic connectors are going to break, the cable ends are going to corrode, the wire covers will dissolve and the idiot at the dealership will be unable to find the fault, because all he ever was thought is to hook up the diagnostic computer and replace whatever pops up on the screen.
№5: Cheap "eco-leather" interior for the sake of production costs. In 5 years it's gonna be cracked and worn out, but the manufacturers don't care because people love "leather interior"
@@xameleon4842 Leather interior is an entierly different subject on its own. Look at any horse carriage from 1500 to 1900 and you will find that the poor servant up front had to sit on leather while lords and ladies in the back were engulfed in finest cloth. leather is sweaty, hot in summer, cold in winter, one slides around, it squeaks and is filled with toxic chemicals. Just because the price of cloth has come down due to industruialisation does not make it inferior.
@@ConfusedSoul24 i personally prefer cloth for the very reasons you mentioned (also, perforated leather is a chore, you cant even properly clean off some random cookie bits your kid dropped on a seat) But i must admit that even cheap leather looks more "premium" compared to generic cloth. So the car manufacturers do exactly that - they use cheap fake leather (eco-leather, my bad) to sell more. Pretty often you can find cloth only in very basic variants of a car, unless it is possible to extensively configure your car before purchasing, as opposed to just choosing between 2-4 variants
My favorite feature of my car, aside from the manual transmission, is a regular radio. With buttons and two knobs. If it was any more old-school it would have a needle tuner 😂
Manual gearboxes are a lot more fun to drive IMO. I'm never considering buying an AT/AMT/CVT becaise they feel dumb. In a manual gearbox your shifting efficiency is a matter of your skill. In an automatic one it's a matter of the algorithm that you can not really improve or make versatile enough for all conditions. The manual mode of ATs/AMTs is rather for locking in lower gears for bad terrain, using it while driving makes shifting even dumber. Talking about radio, radios used to be not only with two knobs but also with one knob or buttons only. The two knob layout however has become my favorite one as well. There is no need to install a color touchscreen in a car as well. It's too small for cinema and too offset for navigation. Most people still prefer using their own smartphones for navigation and there is no better place for it than on a windshield so that you can keep your eyes on the road. So IMO the whole infotainment system is completely useless while driving.
Probably somewhere they are already designing a car that has no windows it will be like spacecraft from some science fiction shows or games where vessels don't have windows and use cameras instead to project the illusion of windows. One game says windows are structural weaknesses, which in some cases they are but being able to look out a window is good for someone's sanity well unless your neighbor is a nudist and a horrible looking person in the nude or a Bernie supporter then you don't bother.
@@02091992able There was a concept car I remember from someone I remember some time ago, with complete auto pilot and big monitors rather then windshield so that you can watch movies which your intelligently stupid car is hurtling on the freeway at 100MPH ready to shred into pieces.
The ever growing window "shoulder." I'm a modest 5'6", and I can't put my arm on a windowsill anymore because the shoulders are too high up. This also contributes to terrrrrrible visibility around the car, which necessitates cameras and sensors all around the car, which means more cost, failure, and even more cost.
That is mostly due to side impact and rollover standards, a few cars manage to get a lower beltline these days. The Honda Accord and Subaru Legacy both still have exceptional visibility.
@@mrvwbug4423 Yep most older vehicles are death traps so this is one modern annoyance that makes sense. I still hate it. Love resting my arm on the window but I never do it in my new car since its so uncomfortable now.
Here in Canada they are cracking down on distracted drivers. Now you can't even adjust the heater/Ac without being distracted by looking at a stupid screen. Bring back good old fashioned knobs and dials that you adjust without distraction!
Gives them a chance to up the 'perceived quality' by making nice feeling analogue controls. I much prefer a nice feeling clicky switch or smooth dial than an iPad menu screen you have to look at when you should be looking at the road
Distracted driving here in manitoba as of nov 1, now gets you a $672 fine, 5 points against your license and an automatic 3 day license suspension (im sure thatll be challenged)
I 100% agree, touch screens are incredibly distracting because you can't feel what you're doing. Why would car manufacturers think doing something that takes people's eyes of the road is a good thing?
I'll give a parallel example here from the world of music synthsizers. From the late 80's onwards they started moving sound controls from physical knobs to screens, and menus. Peeps thought this was cool until they realised it takes much longer to sculpt your sound, but also you can't just grab a couple of knobs and change two things at once, or change sound parameters easily during live performance. Now things are going back strongly to "the old ways" with a physical control per function. It's just better. There's a difference between "easy to learn" and "easy to use"..
Not being able to get certain options on anything but the base or the top trim. Some examples: a manual available only on a base model with the weakest engine. Or having to buy the top trim to get navigation or sunroof.
Agreed, looked up the new Colorado and was kinda excited to see a manual offered, but that dissipated pretty quickly when I found it was offered only on the base RWD model with NO OTHER OPTIONS. Any other option added and you lost the manual.
Definitely. I rented a Volvo for a weekend trip and I can’t explain how difficult it is to nativate through the touch screen menu while driving. It’s a good thing my gf was pasanger, otherwise I’d have to pull over every time.
The stupidest thing is to take things that pull your attention off the road into a car. Knobs turn right hot, left cold, right vol up, left vol down, up arrow increase, down arrow decrease...i returned a high end stereo because everything is touch screen and you cant feel where your hand is and have to remember the different screens so you don't have to look down...replaced with less futuristic looking but more driver safe touch screen and real button stereo
If you think molding the dash around a screen is more expensive then you don't really understand manufacturing. Making a cutout for a screen on a dash is simple, I know since I work at a place where we have manufactured dashes for trucks, lifters and other industrial equipment. Me adding a cutout for a screen on a piece that already needs milling is nothing and takes 10sec extra in manufacturing. In fact, having it stuck on/sticking out ADDS materials and cost with housing and whatnot. The reason car manufacturers put a screen on the dash that sticks up is so that it is closer to your sightline. If it sticks out/up, then all you need to do is glance to the side to see the screen. If its moulded into the dash, you will have to look down and take your eyes of the road. And since it's primarily touchscreens nowadays, molding it into the dash puts it further away from you, possibly forcing you to stretch for it to use it. In short, there are many reasons for having the screen stick out of the dash, cost savings is not one of them.
I literally came to comment this, then realized you commented it. I love it when he called it cheap and no thought going into it. Funny that the best German engineered cars have the dash line stuck out screens. Idk? Maybe it has to do with the fact that it’s ergonomically better and safer. *eye roll* this guy obviously doesn’t do very much research when making his videos
They still suck, though... They look aftermarket and cheap compared to every well designed integrated screen, they are more easily damaged (which I can prove) and attract more unwanted eyes (which statistics from european insurances and polices prove)...
TheStraightPipes Sorry, but I love piano black. Makes interior feel upscale. Many of us like it; we just don’t yell about it all the time. I don’t really notice the fingerprints. And when I do, I just wipe ‘em off with a soft lens cleaning cloth, no cleaners or solutions necessary. Takes about 20 seconds. By this logic, should we get rid of shiny paint on exteriors, too? After all, flat, non-glossy colors would hide a lot more and clean up WAY faster. 🙄
I'll always prefer a knob. A driver's vehicle needs something less visual requiring and more feel. I can reach down a turn a knob without looking and know what it does. These computer screens will break or get slow and these cars are not made to last
I know this is not a comment where it’s meant to make you laugh. But I fucking died, “I can reach down and turns knob without looking and I know what it does” “I’ll always prefer a knob,”
@@blackduck5054 just wait a few more decades, soon it'll be the car is meant to be the driver, and interior designs will be nothing more of a screen for music selection and temperature.
These days you can do almost everything with the steering wheel buttons, you also might need an engineering degree to figure out your steering wheel haha
3yrs later & this guy just described 90% of vehicles manufactured. I specifically looked for a vehicle that didn’t have a tacked on info screen, regular door handles, descent sized tires, naturally aspirated & tactile controls (knobs/buttons) for most of the interior controls, no piano black surfaces & no fake exhausts. I found it with the GR86. It does have the pipes in sound, but I can disable it.
Wow someone that actually mentions the security risk of wireless ethernet in a car! This guy keeps showing much underrated and underappreciated he is and easily deserves more subs. Keep it up man you're doing us car people justice!
I love my Subaru Crosstrek even if it's basically a lifted Impreza. Meh. I'm never going back to a sedan and I never want a low vehicle again that drags its bumper and fender over the road.
When did trucks become luxury?.. I just want to dump a load rock in the bed.. now I've gotta wait 3 minutes for the tailgate to lower.. it's a truck, not an office.
Bingo! Trucks nowadays are done up like a Maybach. Who is going to get into one with muddy workboots, or, put dirty overalls on those fine, heated leather seats? They're too nice (and fragile) for what they were built for (and, what the commercials show). Trucks are supposed to be rugged, utilitarian, work vehicles. That is part of the appeal of driving one. Folding vinyl bench seat, roll up windows, maybe a cup holder. Cheap, tough, and, good for hauling, and, getting dirty. Now they seem to be made for people with Gucci workboots, Chanel tool belts, and, Armani coveralls.
Why did you buy a truck with a powered tailgate? Even then, its not opening a portal to Mordor so why is it taking 3 min? You create your own problem and then wanna bitch about it smh.
@@eat_a_dick_trudeau All the truck makers make basic utilitarian trucks with all the things with suggested available for purchase for brand new. RAM even makes a plastic seat version (tradesman). What are you specifically complaining about? That some people have the option of spending 3x what you spend? How and why does that chap your balls?? If trucks were ONLY available in $60k models with maybach features as you put it, then you'd have a case. But till then, Jesus Christ stop bitching about things that have no bearing on your needs. If anything you should be happy because the people paying 60k for their grocery getter soccer mom truck with 22" rims are subsidizing the cost of the basic 25k utilitarian that you and I buy!
@fukthegoog Ah I see. Interesting point sir. However I just jumped on Ford's Build a F150 on their site and seems its pretty simple to add the FX4 package for only $770 which adds the HDC and locking rear to their lower XL Mid trim. You can add 4x4 to that same lower XL Mid trim. Granted I took two seconds to look into this so what I missing here? FX4 Off-Road Package $770 S4 Add Optional on XL Mid, XLT, LARIAT, King Ranch®, and Platinum 4x4. Includes: • 3.31 Electronic-locking rear-axle with 5.0L V8 engine or 3.5L V6 EcoBoost® engine • 3.55 Electronic-locking rear-axle with 2.7L V6 EcoBoost® engine • 4x4 "FX4 Off-Road" bodyside decal • Hill Descent Control™ • Off-road tuned front shock absorbers • Skid plates: fuel tank, transfer case, and front differential
Electric parking brake! This is a feature that must die. When the battery is dead you have nothing. If your brakes fail, you have a brake that locks the brakes only.... Instead of a hand brake you can actuate to hopefully slow the car.
A parking brake is also called "emergency brake" for a reason. Although they seem to forget that reason. Also, it should be a HAND brake not a "second foot brake"
Nope, I love the electronic parking brake and am looking forward to having that feature on my next car. Sorry, I'm too old to be doing handbrake drifts and how often does your battery actually die anyway? I suppose on a MT I'd prefer a regular handbrake right behind the shifter, but in a luxury car I damn well EXPECT to have an E-Brake switch on the center console.
For the people in hurry; 1. Fake Engine Noise 0:35 2. Electronic Door Handles 01:42 3. Stuck on Info Screens 02:38 4. Over-Complicated Tech 03:30 5. Infotainment 04:50 6. Oversized Wheels and Tires 06:18 7. Piano Black Gloss Plastic and Plastic Chrome 07:29 8. Turbo Everything 08:25 9. Fake Vents and Exhaust Tips 09:45 10. Truth in marketing and advertising 10:28
@@RUSTYCHEVYTRUCK I know it's insane. I am a few days away from turning 40 and thought I was just getting old man eyes. I had a co-worker confirm that the lights are out of hand. But he is also getting on in years too...wawaaaa
I made this same reply to another response above... A tip for you .... My dad taught me this and I recently told this to my son, who's learning to drive. If the glare from the oncoming traffic is too much and you can't see, try looking down to the right at the curb, side of the road, shoulder etc. Normally, the glare is temporary as you mentioned. This is not the best, but better than guessing where the road is :)
And LED taillights in some cars, like Cadillac. Plus many headlights do not properly illuminate the correct area or the side as per the insurance institute.
Most of the time, yes. But a lot of these complaints are directed at cars out of warranty. Say you have a hatchback or an SUV, used. The key fob is out of batteries, and there is no interior lever to open the hatch. You need a key, yes? Most cars don't have them on the rear hatch at all, except those few that have no electronic windows/locks package on a trim level (the Chevy Spark LS is the only one that comes to mind). Also, you can have electronically controlled locks that allow you to use a key as a backup, but manufacturers have moved away from that.@@000darkorbit000
I might add: "Windows are getting smaller and smaller, especially the windows to the back and sides." There must have been an immense rise in glass prices...
I thought it was because of the fuel efficiency standards. That they're trying to make cars more and more aerodynamic. Also, that's why every car is pretty much starting to look the same. Not sure if this is true, but it seems to make sense at least. Either way, fuck the government and car manufacturers too
@@richiemandina5305 It has nothing to do with aerodynamics, having larger windows doesn't impact that unless you change the shape of the cabin. It's because modern safety regulations require a cars fortified impact zone meet a certain height, and that pillars be of a certain strength (achieved with thicker posts) for increased safety in a rollover. Also only a certain percentage of a cars surface area is allowed to be glass. This is all to prevent people from getting crushed in a rollover and having less of their skin be shredded by flying glass.
@@eyegrinder94 I mean, you may be mostly right about all that, but how could you believe that aerodynamics has nothing to do with it at all? Cabin shape clearly has a lot to do with aerodynamics. That's why you don't see many SUV's sitting up high, with steep windshields like they used to have. Now they have these huge windshields that are nearly horizontal, and ugly cabins and dashboards that are designed to accommodate this new shape. And if you're looking to cut through the air easier, wouldn't that obviously include making the cabins more squat, consequently reducing the space for windows? I'm not saying it's not about safety, but I think it's silly to assume it's not affected in the least by the pursuit of more aerodynamic vehicles for higher MPG's
@@richiemandina5305 Fair point. What I meant was rather that cars in the past got around the visibility issues while maintaining excellent aerodynamics because they were able to use more glass and thinner pillars. They can't do that anymore, so when they had to meet both safety and efficiency standards, visibility is what they sacrificed. I guess it's a combination of both, sorry if I seemed like a jackass or something.
I have such a button, and I wouldn't want a car without anymore. It comes on when I stop and turn off the car, and when I want to drive, it turns off. Very comfortable. I love it. The only reason why I would want a regular handbrake is to let the back slide, but that doesn't happen too often.
Lmao i know, it's hilarious. My gf has a Mazda 6 GT with 19" wheels, luckily I'm no dumby and got 17" steel wheels with the proper sized tire to match the stock tires for winter.
@@benutzername100 that's utterly INSANE i can buy a 35" tire for 350$ with a 17" rim. Big wheels is stupid. On most cars, 17" wheel is more than enough.
@@flagovhate Yeah I have a 2017 Mazda 6 GT and it was about a grand to buy a set of 19” winters. I do enjoy a firmer ride quality and that’s my personal preference but to people that don’t care I would recommend doing some research before you get sticker shock on tire prices.
Touch screens drive me bonkers, they're starting to implement laws that prohibit driving and using your phone and then turn your car controls into a phone. I realize that voice control is becoming a thing, but nothing beats physical buttons for quick, essential functions.
to me, infotainment systems are completely useless. They are way too distracting, laggy and useless. If I want to use maps I'll use google maps on a phone stand. If I want to use my phone, phone stand again. I'd prefer to have a good set of high quality speakers, an aux port, a bluetooth system (to make calling easier). I don't want a radio either, I just don't use them. I prefer a car to look luxurious without all the stupid screens put on. I think luxury cars nowadays are absolutely gorgeous if only we can remove those stupid screens. In fact, I can go all day long about stupid standard options on a car. I wish that it was possible to just choose literally every useless option on your car (except for standard things like cruise control, air conditioning, air bags, esc, tsc). But of course no manufacturer wants you to pay less money.
@@2010ngojo that kind of complication and increase in weight is what I do not want. I never found using apple carplay and android auto to ever beat using my phone. A charging socket or USB would be good enough for me if that is the problem. But even then, my phone battery is fine and I always know how to manage it. I never leave with a dead battery. I don't wan to compromise my driving experience and the interior look of my car with a bunch of screens that will look dated in a few years just to show my phone on a slightly larger screen.
@@ha_ha-ha_ha I use my phone for streaming audio. I am not putting more wear on the battery and use GPS for a long time does that. Add weight? Like what, 10-15 pounds at most? That's nothing. And the larger screens help greatly with visibility. You say you don't want to get distracted, and yet you use a phone with a smaller screen. Ironic, really.
...plus you can upgrade your phone and its apps much more easily/cheaply. Once your car hits 5-10 years old that infotainment system will be ancient. What are you going to do? Buy a whole new car?
Also, who uses the radio anymore? It sounds like shit, has ads and you have no control. Electronic parking isn’t even the only option when it’s there either.
4 роки тому+2
@@DavidRamirez-vc8dr u must don't know how to drive
Dre Mill for what reason would you want to carry physical keys when a phone is always with you and better in every way? Apple Car Key will work even after the battery is depleted if you set it up like that. Someone can easily steal your key, but if someone steals your phone they gotta steal your finger or face. More convenience, more secure, less heavy pockets, no keys scratching. 🤷♂️
Spot on. I think Ford has really screwed up on the cancellation of their sedans. Lets sit back and watch gas climb back up & watch the auctions load up with used SUV crap. I love the mom and 1 small kid in a big ass SUV.
I absolutely Despise SUV's ! .... Sick of all the added tech in recent years... black boxes, event data recorders, how so many cars look boring and alike, and the rarity of manual transmissions.... Sold my '01 BULLITT.. 1st year of EDRs in Mustangs... and just got rid of my 2 yr old, 2017 124 spider due to all the tech... I priced probable replacement parts it might need in later years one day out of curiousity .. a heater control module... $1100 !!!.. No more modern cars for me.. I am now driving my classic cars as my daily drivers... '65 Corvair vert.. '66 Corvair Coupe w/AC, and my '68 Sprite... Loving it.. A lot more FUN !.. and.. $60/mo full coverage total, for all 3 combined... no mileage limits.. going to sell one of the Corvairs, and replace it with either an MGB, Supercharged or with V6 V8 swap, or find a nice low mile TR8 roadster.....
Having heater knobs in infotainment should be outlawed. We don't use mobiles and drive so why should we go through 7 menus just to turn the heater up. Just naw!
I use the infotainment controls almost exclusively for the HVAC in my car. I don't think I've ever actually used the redundant physical buttons once. The radio controls I use the on-wheel buttons almost exclusively.
1997 NSX Engineer: You eliminated the pop up headlights? 2017 NSX Engineer: Right, the mechanism was heavy 1997 NSX Engineer: What do your batteries and 3 auxiliary motors weigh? 2017 NSX Engineer: 1000 lbs give or take
Lol that's funny (To joykill though, pop-up headlights were actually made illegal due to pedestrian collision concerns, though I find it ironic how American cars were some of the last to use them (Corvette and Trans Am)
I really, REALLY appreciate and respect the approach of being highly skeptical and deeply critical without a trace of anger or bitterness. Just... thank you.
the sad turth is that people who bring in the money are not car enthusiast, but at the same time cars have become such a status symbol that everyone has to have the latest and greatest, if you want an example of this look at suvs, they are selling like hot cakes and they are litteraly designed for no one, offroad enthusiasts don't like them, sporty car enthusiast don't like them, people who are about practicality don't like them, yet they still sell them
Removing the manual transmission option in general, or those that still have it, limit the manual to the base trims. I'd like a manual in the highest trim tyvm.
Mikey R I’m sure you and all 12 other likeminded individuals across the continent would be enough to justify the millions spent importing and/or developing a separate drivetrain.
J O With all things considered, I think one can safely argue that manual cars feel more fun, and is more engaging. That’s the reason why these people, and myself as well, want them. But at the same time, it is so easy to see how little of the market we represent once you start comparing the many usage scenarios of vehicle by weighting them with their frequency. After which, it’s just a simple question of why should a company treat each scenario as equal when people experience some (I.e. commuting) more than others?
Soft closing doors takes away the feeling of having a car imo. I love that "thump" or "clunk" sound when I close my doors but sadly its disappearing nowadays
Stupidly, dangerously bright low beam headlights on new cars - as mentioned several times.... are there not specific standards from SAE for headlight brightness and beam pattern, so as not to blind oncoming drivers? What happened to these standards? We had the technology to put aircraft landing lights on cars back in the 1960s, but there was a very good reason it was not done... blinding other drivers!!!
The crash test people started rating headlights like last year or so. Maybe we will see change in the future. Another person's bad vision is no excuse to burn other people's retinas
Actually many brands have toned it down by using led lights. Most will only project to a certain height aswell. The german cars were horrible bout it in the 2000s. Also people get after market lights like me so i can blind those jackasses who dont use their low beams so ive got halogens and leds to blind ya back when i flip by brights on.
playloud247 Not necessarily. My Subaru crosstrek is much cheaper than a normal suv, and can fit my drum set, hardware, and cymbals with a passenger seat to spare.
"Maybe they should pour more money into reliability than gimmicks" But gimmicks are what people see.. and what sells... Nobody expects car to last long (because that hurts polar bears apparently)
I like redundancy and always appreciate a car that has BOTH on-screen buttons for all features as well as physical buttons for stuff like HVAC controls.
I like knowing exactly where every button and dial is located, so I don't have to take my eyes off the road to adjust the heat or change the radio station or volume.
It's all about image. Sort of like seeing ground effects appendages hanging from some sedans and Ricers even though the car is too high from the ground to have any appreciable effect.
@@MrNothingButAir There are a lot.. Subaru does it on quite of few of their models, Nissan Altima SR, Sport model Honda Civics, and plenty others. Some other CVTs alternatively have +/- on the gearbox (what that is called escapes me...), also fairly pointless. I don't mind a Sport driving mode on a CVT, but it's plain silly to have paddle shifters.
I love my 88 Eldorado. Yeah, it has a few cheap interior bits, but it's really bare bones otherwise. Electric seats and windows are the cars "luxury" features. It also has a neat on board diagnostics system, but it is really easy to understand and not poorly implemented into the dash. Honestly, if the reliability and power of Cadillacs HT family of engines was better, it would be a pretty damn nice little coupe.
THIS. When I was a kid, car commercials showed the car, its engine, talked about how fast it was, what it could do, and the standard features it had. And it made you feel connected with the brand, and proud of what you owned. How anyone with a new car will ever feel that way about the brand or car is beyond me. They all look the same, and do the same things. Its all just a bunch of carbon copys rolling around with different badges and brands slapped on. That reason alone has kept me from purchasing anything past the year 2001 for the last decade.
Ken Smith Well the cheaper brands definitely ARE ugly. the more expensive brands however even thought they look about the same, many of them are beautiful.
@@LrulestheworldM8 Dodge seems to have no problem showing off their cars, specially the performance ones. Their entire twitter is full of proud owner pictures of Challengers and Chargers.
Exactly! I have Two, 2 seater older cars that somehow found room for an inflated donut spare but, my 2017 minivan can't find the room for a spare? Even the Optional spare was one that had to be inflated? (To get the spare I would've had to delete another feature).?
To be honest: I've been driving for 41 years and only 1 time ever did I need a spare. And it was in the parking lot of an apartment I rented. Now I don't put on 100K miles per year, but still....in 41 years of driving? And I've been driving my pickup on construction sites for 10 years which are prone to nails and screws all over the place....and not a flat yet.
Thanks for being a solid straight shooter!! Domestic and Foreign auto manufacturers are constantly trying to sale a gimmicky product and they don't care about it's longevity or software support. It used to be the mechanics of a automobile determined when it was time to get rid of it, now it's electronics. PCM, BCM and ECM on every modern car can cost thousands to repair and that may not be the end of your problems. Electronics controlling your interior space can disable EVERYTHING to make the auto unlivable forcing you to strongly consider getting rid of it. Take me back to the shade tree mechanic days when you could actually repair a car yourself. The billing rate for a certified mechanic is about $140.00/hr in the North Texas area. I can guarantee you nothing gets fix in one hour. Every repair is high dollar.
i dislike the trend of suv-ification. vehicles like the jeep renegade and chevy trax make me want to die. they have the cargo space and seat space of a mid side sedan, and all the downsides of suvs. Heavy, high center of gravity, huge expensive wheels and tires. Also i dislike how EVERYTHING HAS TO BE ALL WHEEL DRIVE. its so hopelessly unnecessary. It adds so much cost to the vehicles service, and upfront cost. plus people dont realize that awd only helps acceleration. steering and braking are needed too. A fwd car with snow tires will be one million times safer and more controllable in snow than a car with half worn all seasons with awd
Don't forget how SUV-ification even ruined iconic names such as the Mitsubishi Eclipse and Chevy Blazer. When the new Blazer was announced everyone was hoping for a colorado-based competitor to the new Bronco, but instead we got dissapointed.
I love how people who likely don't live anywhere that it snows always bash AWD. A good AWD system does more than just get you going, it also helps cut down on under/over steer and generally gives more stable handling on snow and ice. Those crossovers like the Renegade also give you some extra ground clearance which can allow for some light off roading without the size or expense of a full blown 4x4 truck or SUV. You also now have a properly off road capable crossover in the form of the Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk, unlike the Renegade it is the real deal with a real low range, full skidplates, and a locking diff, I have one and it will go anywhere that any other stock 4x4 truck will go with the exception of a Wrangler.
@@f181234 that is fair enough given the market conditions, but my point is, did they seriously have to stick with the name Eclipse just to try to attract people that remember the old one? Literally, any other non-iconic name would have done
I disagree with more then half. I like pop out screens and the more cameras the safer. turbos are awesome and ive never had a repair problem with them.
I know, right?!? Do everything right and nobody notices it.. but one mistake stands out like a sore thumb... Hilarious. There is a feature on Windows 10 that holds out any notification when you're doing a presentation. Someone help this guy.. lol.
Knowing him, he left that in on purpose. He works so hard on his editing, this gotta be intentional. So funny, saying he is a tech guy and knows stuff and the error comes on. The message is to not take all of it and his show so damn seriously.
Add the pop-up nanny/lawyer statement that shows up every time you start a vehicle. Even more annoying is that it stays there and won't let you close it until it's good and ready to go away.
the law statements are there because they don't wanna be bothered by getting sued by some moron. americans in particular are very sue happy, even in their own fault. so manufacturers take precautions.
Well, of course. There are reasons for all of the issues mentioned in the video - cost cutting, safety, etc. - that doesn't make them any less annoying.
@@stevethea5250 100% agree with you. I've had to rent a couple new f150s with this feature and hate it plus they are counter-intuitive, pull to engage push to dis-engage button vs. the old style peddle and how do I do a J- turn with one of those things. LOL
While I can certainly do without the piped-in engine noise, I understand why. I owned a 2011 Mustang GT that had a sound tube coming from the intake and piped into the cabin. I thought it was terrible so I deleted it and was much happier. However, I read an article where a Ford engineer explained why they decided to do it. 1. They can't make the exhaust any louder because of EPA rules on sound pollution. 2. Everyone wants a quieter cabin these days to companies have added a lot more sound deadening material (which reduces any natural engine/exhaust sound heard inside the cabin). And 3....and this one is big. He stated that when under development, they had two identical Mustang GT's with the 5.0 and had people drive and rate them. Only difference is one had a sound tube and one did not. Every single person who drove both of them were sure the one with the sound tube was faster and more powerful. They were only told that the cars were different but nothing more. So, they liked the car better when they thought it was faster or more powerful. Kind of crazy but I guess Ford wouldn't have spent the time, energy, and resources to research and develop it if it didn't do something, right?
Sound tubes are not as bad as fake sound being played through speakers. I mean, that still is actual intake noise. Also, most people (ie same people that thought the louder Mustang is more powerful), do not even know or care about sound being played through speakers.
mrpmj00 the new mustang GTs have adjustable exhaust so that you can tune them to be loud on the track but in a residential area they can be in quiet mode or in normal to minimize sound...maybe that’s it?
Hate it all. Toyota is probably the best one that does it, because at least they mold SOMETHING around the screen, other than that its just kinda stuck on there. Mazda, Kia, Mercedes, Genesis, Hyundai, BMW(this is the worst one imo) just dont look good
I've been working at a car wash for 4 years so I've seen a lot of cars and car trends. Every new "car" is an SUV now. I'm not talking big Tahoe SUV's, I'm talking lifted Subaru Forrester looking SUV's. Every single one looks the exact same from every company, they are indistinguishable from each other. It actually gets annoying having to clean the same car every time that just has a different logo slapped on it.
One that sticks out to me is high beltlines. So many cars have the door sills so high that people's heads are barely peeking over, it's like you're sitting down really low. Even the dashboards are really high with a super slanted front windshield that just feels awkward to look out of and judge the dimensions of your car. I can't count how many times I look in my rear view and see a brand new car with a woman's knuckles and a tuft of hair peeking over the steering wheel because the dashboard is so tall lol. I liked that older cars, about 15 years ago and older had lower door sills, skinnier pillars, lower dashboards, longer hoods and trunks. I understand new cars have to conform to safety regulations and make the exterior based off wind tunnel tests, but it makes so many of these newer cars annoying to drive, and also visually unappealing imo.
So much this. I can barely rest my arm on the window of some cars. I’m all for car safety but, I also ride a motorcycle. I guess I’ll just have to buy older cars.
You really nailed this list. Agree with every bit. I complain about almost all of this regularly and my non car friends just look at me like... What? Come on! Thanks for a great video.
_"I complain about almost all of this regularly and my non car friends just look at me like... What?"_ -- 802 Garage Same experience here, even with occasional-car-enthusiasts.
This is phenomenal! You touched on everything that irks me about modern cars, especially the performance cars (AMG’s, BMW M’s etc). One would think that these would be spared, but it is sadly not the case.
"We're just going to put 20 cameras on a car and then stick a screen in front of you so you don't have to look through glass." Car companies are taking notes right now and building a prototype on that idea right now because of you.
Wat? GPS doesn't use your wireless data link. You can put your phone in airplane mode and its GPS receiver will work. The smartphone weasels want you always connected but you don't have to be.
I think the same if some car-reviewers are mad about cars that not good in drifting or dont have RWD. that shouldnt be a criterium at all espacially for people who just want to daily drive their vehicles
I personally hate the selection of new car "trims" being incredibly difficult to understand and comprehend. The Toyota 2019 Rav4 has an LE, XLE, XLE premium, XSE hybrid, adventure, and limited. Then on top of all of that they all have different packages within these five different trims. The XLE Premium grade weather package, Entune 3.0 JBL package, the entune with weather package, the entune with technology package, the entune with weather AND technology package. To hell with this just give me 3 different trims with three different price points predominantly for what that car is stocked with. Because navigating the difference between your trims and packages require 4 different youtube videos and a tylenol.
I totally agree with this! I wish a company like Subaru, for instance, would just simplify it. Put in everything, and all you do is pick the colors you want and whether you want cloth or leather. Just have each model based on size and segment be priced accordingly. That would be the best way to go about it. Either that, or literally just start with a base model, and people just simply add exactly what they want and then vehicle is produced to that spec. Of course, make sure the financing won't fall through, but that would work too. The industry just needs a change in the way they do business.
Toyota dealer employee here, one of the biggest stores in the midwest. I don’t mind the trims, but I do mind the shitty infotainment screens. It’s a known issue that the EnTune system, or whatever it’s called, has poor compatibility with iPhones (dating back to iPhone 6S) and we get lots of people complaining about how they can’t sync their phones - some even call them deal breaking and don’t get another for their next lease. They also crash, boot loop, and restart on their own during trips so frequently we have to diagnose it. We see it every day.
Agree 100%, surprised more don't talk about this. I hate the modern E-brakes - we were doing fine with a lever, and it did not take up that much room if it was placed logically. The argument for them is that they save space, but this is nonsense. Toyota got it right in the 1990s - lever very close to drivers seat and out of the way of the arm rest and cup holder.
Totally agree. A proper handbrake helped me get out of trouble once. Snow and ice, on a country road I know well, so had already slowed down, turned wheel, car kept going straight, turned wheel a bit more, still going straignt and heading for the ditch. Used a bit of handbrake to lock up the back wheels for a moment and kick out the back end of the car, basically got the car drifting and avoided the ditch.
True, I also remember a friend of mine had his battery go flat and could not move the car as the handbrake (electronic) was stuck on! Car was in a dangerous position as well. There is an emergency release but we had to search for it - not everyone is going to know that in an emergency.
Why? After owning 2 doors for years and dealing with huge heavy doors in parking lots and people trying to get in and out of the back I swore I’d never buy one again. Four door cars look as good or even better than two door cars. It’s funny that often the two door cars people fawn over (Challenger, Camaro, etc) often look more pedestrian than many performance oriented four door sedans (E63 AMG, KIA Stinger, etc)
Yeah - nothing like having an iPad or flat screen TV super glued to your dashboard! Tesla comes to mind.
I coworker has told me that after about 5 years they have a tendency to leak fluid if you live in a place with heat. Like Texas.
Originally i thought those screens above the dashboard were aimed to keep your eyes closer to the road... but cutting cost makes sense too...
the higher up they put the screen with out it getting in your line of sight the better has been proven .I guess he hates head up displays too . The idea is to keep your eyes on the road not looking down at a display low down on the dash .
most of the Tesla models are done well.... Mercedes on the other hand look like trash
@@softwareengineer6702 okay but lets be real here... if you can afford a Mercedes you most likely arent going to have a 5 to 10 year old version of that car. Also there are quite a few companies that manufacture and fit updated/aftermarket versions for those oldhat head units.
This video is now over four years old, and I feel like OEMs watched this and decided to double down on all of these ridiculous trends, and then add in a few more for good measure.
Four years later and nothing has changed for the better. I will resist like crazy to get a new car that doesn't have a physical button for volume and heat/cold.
Well, the Globalist agenda calls for more artificial trends, push for EV and the minimization of personal property ownership. It's all by design to excerpt control over people.
It appears some manufacturers are dialing back the digital controls.
The tacked on screens is fine because when those screens inevitably fail, it should be easier/cheaper to replace than ripping the entire dash apart… in theory.
@@jesustsa1 It's a cheap alternative. All the cheap quality cars have tacked-on screens. The luxury or great quality vehicles have integrated screens. On top of that, there are not physical buttons. Another cheap alternatives. Before Ford's excuse was the great motor, but now that motor has a locked ECU. It's a terrible buy compared to the S550. And it's uglier. It's the Mustang II all over again.
Taking away physical controls for even simple things like volume and AC is extremely dangerous it's baffling.
Not just dangerous it’s less satisfying. Tesla doesn’t even have a button on the glove box to open the glove box. That’s just poor design choice.
I'm surprised how manufactures have gone to "distracted driving" as an innovation. Very dangerous!
It's cheaper... 🤷♂️
Removing buttons and adding them to a laggy screen is the most dangerous trend ever
Worst than texting & driving.
True. It's dangerous.
Worst thing about my wife’s Pilot
Absolutely true. But it has 3 advantages for the manufacturer: it costs less than all the buttons, small cogwheels and cables. Then can be used in all the cars models. And finally it is "fashion" for common people who in the majority want useless but shiny gimmicks on a tablet like device, then it's good for marketing.
The end result it is a disaster for the customer: unreliable and a nightmare to use. But who cares, the car manufacturer is happy because it costs less, and the customer has a useless colorful toy to play with.
Agree, I’ve never got why everyone was so excited about Tesla’s big iPad, like really? Is that the future?? It seems like everyone forgot real buttons give you touch feedback so you don’t have to take your eyes from the road!
The thing with knobs and buttons is that you can feel it while keeping your eyes on the road. With a touchscreen, you only feel the screen, not the actual button
This. With modern phones you at least get feedback with haptic motors, but with touch infotainment you have no feedback if you look at the road.
and its probably in a bunch of sub menus where you almost gotta pull over and fuck with it smh
No shit
Some manufacturers (like my Mazda) actually disable touch screen functions if the car is moving. A good idea I think.
There’s a reason military vehicles are tactile vs capacitive and screen touch
Fake engine noise is the most sinful thing I've ever heard of
"We have a 1,5 liter, 3-cylinder, turbocharged engine but for some reason it sound shit."
"Let's put some supercar noises on speakers! That'll fix it."
*Employee of the month*
I agree. I had no idea and now I feel dirty and sick. I'm having a 3 hour shower after watching this.
I was heartbroken when BMW did it, and on the M series cars no less!
Cof cof BMW
RexToTheMax exactly
Removing physical buttons by adding them to a screen that lags every time.
Not tesla
This. How is it that iPhones have had a buttery smooth interface for over a decade yet new cars still have touchscreens that lag and dont respond immediately.
agree completely. I just bought an '05 Honda Accord Euro, and whilst I do need to set it up to connect my phone to the stereo system, I just love that all the buttons are still physical. So much easier to select, you know when you've hit them properly, and you don't end up with greasy fingerprints all over the screen...
If they used a very nice quality capacitive screen paired with a fast processor, I would love it!
agree. Ive got an aging car 2009. I can reach out my left hand in pitch-black darkness and muscle memory can land it on the large round knob in the center of the dash that controls volume.Else I can work out the orientation of the steering wheel and the location of the volume buttons mounted on it. For most Australian States just touching your phone is a license loss offense. I'm OK with that. But new cars that Android Auto and Apple Carplay can display the whole phone screen are on that big 8" touch screen in the dash Is that touchable or not?. I'm betting not if the police officer involved is behind on his quota for the day Difficult to police because near new cars has settings which must be completed. Turned on or Off in a Tickbox format on those 8" screens. But for the law, Am I turning the ABS on or dialing a phone contact? And if you can't touch that dash-mounted screen, where does that leave the owners of Tesla's where a lot of vital information and settings are displayed/set on that big 11" landscape screen. I think someone should give the road rules authors a quick tour on how modern cars work. They are living back in the era of 1din push-button car radios with an Antenna on the back fender that rises or stows as you turn the device on or off
Headlights that blind other motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. And I'm not talking about improperly installed and aimed aftermarket LEDs and HIDs ..., they're coming straight from the factories with headlights that can illuminate everything for miles. Good only for the driver while everyone else is left temporarily blinded with disability glare. And, it's not about not staring at them ..., they are unavoidable and makes you take your eyes slightly or more off of the road that you are supposed to be looking at while driving in order to avoid an accident.
I keep thinking who is that idiot with high beams on blinding me only to realise its another SUV with dipped beams brighter than the sun and pointing straight into my eyeballs because of the SUVs height.
Agree. Eyes are not designed to look at light but to see with light. Modern lights are offensive and dangerous.
Headlights that when you are going downhill you can't see where you are going
One of those cars is the Corolla, and I had an owner telling me that on lowbeam the visibility isnt that good, even tho oncoming traffic where flashing highs at him!!
I always turn my highbeams on when I'm passing by these cars just so I can sleep a little better at night
The loss of a real spare tire or even a temporary spare ( Doughnut) in favor of that crappy tire repair kit. I believe all these changes are designed to force you back to the dealership when this crap breaks
I see where you're coming from but realistically many people won't cha get the tire themselves (some can't because of health issues, others don't want to be hit by a car, get filthy sweaty or rained on), and they take alot space that could add to cargo space.
@@shanet7511 So the car is designed for the exception instead of the masses??
@oldarkie3880 The masses wont/can't change the tire themselves nowadays. This car is built for the masses.
Exactly 😢
@@shanet7511 The masses are lazy
The worst trend is the ever increasing prices
Capitalism
For literally no reason. Half the car is made of plastic and comes will extra crap like a touch screen radio and paddle shifters on an automatic? I'll just get a used car and save 40 grand.
The price increase is justified by of all the money they waste designing and testing shit like what's in this video lol.
@@headglitch7003 technology increase in cars
when you will see the list of people who designed, engineered, assamble it... this is they salary.
+ prices of a car doesn't worry me, the unreliability of them and paying that capitalistic shit worries me...
That fake noise is so you dont hear the rattling as parts start falling off.
Good one
🤣🤣🤣
@Jahseh Onfroy because its a 3 cylinder hybrid u dumb.
Walk into a pick and pull and then you will truly see which cars are more reliable
@@kicomcg3119 and it costs 150k crazy
One thing that absolutely infuriates me is the response time of the infotainment systems in practically all of the cars. Our phones are lightning fast, it reacts instantly to the touch. For some reason, systems in cars where everything is suddenly a screen take 100-200ms to respond to a touch - an enviroment where its critical that you dont take your eyes off the road for longer then absolutely necessary.. What is it with the tech? Are they using CPUs from 1995?
I wouldn't be surprised if you weren't far off the mark, often the SoC:s chosen for these applications are magnitudes slower than the ones used in modern smartphones despite the car having an expected life of 15-20 years. And this despite far more capable chips often only costing a few dollar more. It's just such a bloody stupid way of saving money while giving the costumer a far worse experience for the lifetime of the car. Luckily it's getting better, thanks both to costumer expectations and more readily available technology. It's still really bad, but at least it's now approaching workable.
Tbh that made sense some years ago because cars have a much longer developement time than normal consumer electronics, so when they come out the infotanment systems are already outdated; nowadays however they have no excuse since phones from 3-4 years ago were already pretty quick
I don't find the infotainment in the 2018 f-150 to be very slow, its pretty snappy.
The center screen in my Tesla Model 3 is just as responsive as my Galaxy phone, I was pleasantly surprised compared to the old infotainment screens of my old ICE cars.
How's your phone from 2-3 years ago? That's the tech that gets into cars, because of development time. The good systems for response are all that "stuck on" design because it's the easiest to get with the latest technology. Imagine designing an entire car interior around a screen today, and 2 years when the car is released to the public, the marketing department says it needs to be faster, brighter, bigger etc. Now you have to re-form the dash, causing huge production delays or just stick it on top and fill in the dead space. Tacked on in the end anyways.
it's amazing, here we are, one year after the release of this video, and there are apparently 11,000 people who enjoy fake exhaust tips, fake vents, motorized door handles, synthesized engine sounds, piano black trim, and screens glued on their dashboards.
Damn! I had to check if you were right, but it's baffling! 11k dislikes?! There aren't that many designers and execs in the car industry, are there?!
Amazing observation. I never would’ve realized this video had so many dislikes if you hadn’t pointed it out. However, I guess when you think of how stupid people are, it becomes kind of obvious. As Scott said, car manufacturers are not doing this for fun, they’re doing it to appease the public.
I can kinda see where they're coming from. This guy is complaining about all sorts of trivial things like black trims, door handles, wheels etc. which are purely subjective. Let people enjoy what they want.
While I agree that he makes a good point regarding the faux exhaust tips and engine noises, he kinda comes off as a boomer who doesn't want to embrace modern design and technology. But hey that's just me.
@@sinuslebastian6366 boomers are just older versions of what millennials are now. In other words the exact same people …but with more wisdom.
If “embracing modern technology” means fat infotainment screens then maybe he has a point.
@@sinuslebastian6366 i agree with u. Most of his complains are trivial things. I do agree on some things like no physicial buttons but mostly I don't really care about his complains. Remember this is capitalism. Consumers demanded most of the feature that he complained. I personally think fake exhaust and vent looks good even though it serves no purpose. Fake engine noise doesn't bother me. Big rims look good to me. Electronic door handles look good to me too.
Getting stuck on the side of a lonely road with no spare tire. The kits they provide instead are often not effective. I like a trusted spare in those moments.
Those fix flat kits also ruin the TPMS sensor and make the tire impossible to be patched, if it would have been possible. So now instead of a $20 patch, you're spending $80 for a new sensor and $150 for a new tire.
Knicole Edwards I always carry a tyre repair kit even though I have a spare tyre. Australia is a big place. It can be easier repairing a tyre still on the car than changing it. And I dont mean goop / slime. Btw, O know someone who used goop 5 times on the one tyre over several years and it worked just fine. Ive used it just fine. TPMs maybe one of those modern things we could do without - didn't need it 10 years ago.
@@nordic5490 TPMS saves lives. The death toll caused by severe underinflation (which isn't very easy to spot in most tires until it's dangerously low) was huge. If you stay on top of your tires, then yeah, you don't need it. I'm a car head and I have a compressor at home, but I like TPMS.
Get run flat tires from Michelin.
The tire kits some manufacturers offer are a double edge sword. There are rare situation where inflating a tire temporarily just to get to a safe situation is key. I'd hate for a loved one of mine to have to be on the side of a dark road trying to change a tire or waiting for hours for road side assistance... Where in five minutes, they could inflate it and drive off.... Yes I know everything can't be quick fixed.
My #1 issue with modern cars...keys that cost hundreds of dollars!
Craig Tate truDat
If you’re an adult and you lose your keys then you deserve to spend that extra money
@@StoneXII
they can break and malfunction too
Screen crack means the car wont start...lol
Eventhough they are so expensive the cars are so easy to steal especially the ones with keyless go!
Trends in transmissions. CVT's, CVT's that pretend to multi-gear automatics, automatics with 25 gear ranges that can't figure out which gear to use. DCT's that aren't reliable.
Every car is “best in class” these days 😂😂
Well, yes. A class defined as "vehicles with less X than ours". But they want you to think it's defined as "vehicles with a similar market position and overall design as ours".
Best jn class but poor in safety
Best in class huh why there are still some cheap plastic😂😭😳
Can we please get a sedan or hatchback with best in class ground clearnce?
I would consider actually buying one but every year they get lower and lower.
😂😂😂😂😂
Four more things:
SUV Everything. No idea why every freakin' car has to be jacked up nowadays, but it has turned into an outright war on physics and sanitiy. Especially ridoculous here in europe where nowadays even tiny hatchbacks for the city are jacked up.
The second relates to several of the things you mentioned. Every vehicle has to be "sporty". Started with the luxury sedan market in the 90's but now every car truck and minivan is "sporty". Meaning fake grills, huge wheels, a billion unnecessary horsepower, noisy exhaust, uncomfortable seats and a shitty ride. it's just plain stupid and it ruins every other aspect of a vehicle for something that is neither attainable nor desirable.
Third is the constant rise of what car designers refer to as the beltline (the line seperating the body from the windows) by now in normal cars they have reached shoulder height. first it felt like sitting in a bathtub. by now they have reached the point where it feels like sitting in a bunker.
And last but not least. unnecessary electronics on everything. a power window used to be a switch and a motor and it worked completely fine, but now the switch is wired to the door unit which only works when it is connected to the gazillion other units via canbus. you want to change temperature - you have to get into the climate menu on your touchscreen. you want to get a new radio because in 5 years the one you have won't connect to your phone - well too bad. And you know fully well that in 10 years the plastic connectors are going to break, the cable ends are going to corrode, the wire covers will dissolve and the idiot at the dealership will be unable to find the fault, because all he ever was thought is to hook up the diagnostic computer and replace whatever pops up on the screen.
My words!
It is easier to SUV than to squat.
№5: Cheap "eco-leather" interior for the sake of production costs. In 5 years it's gonna be cracked and worn out, but the manufacturers don't care because people love "leather interior"
@@xameleon4842 Leather interior is an entierly different subject on its own. Look at any horse carriage from 1500 to 1900 and you will find that the poor servant up front had to sit on leather while lords and ladies in the back were engulfed in finest cloth. leather is sweaty, hot in summer, cold in winter, one slides around, it squeaks and is filled with toxic chemicals. Just because the price of cloth has come down due to industruialisation does not make it inferior.
@@ConfusedSoul24 i personally prefer cloth for the very reasons you mentioned (also, perforated leather is a chore, you cant even properly clean off some random cookie bits your kid dropped on a seat) But i must admit that even cheap leather looks more "premium" compared to generic cloth. So the car manufacturers do exactly that - they use cheap fake leather (eco-leather, my bad) to sell more. Pretty often you can find cloth only in very basic variants of a car, unless it is possible to extensively configure your car before purchasing, as opposed to just choosing between 2-4 variants
“Put 20 cameras on the car and giant screen so you don’t have to look outside through glass”
Daybreakers reference
Exactly my thoughts. That will come in handy when I turn into a vampire. At least I will be able to go out during the daytime.
I think the modern car trends that irritates me the most are, fake exhaust / vents and those SUVs that looks like "coupé"
Car companies also need to stop redefining terms and definitions. A 4-door 'coupe' is not a coupe!!
I love Coupé SUVs 😂
My favorite feature of my car, aside from the manual transmission, is a regular radio. With buttons and two knobs. If it was any more old-school it would have a needle tuner 😂
How bout a good old fashioned carburetor?
I don't mind the 80's to 90's era DIN standard so you can upgrade every few years: tape to CD to stick to bluetooth
Manual gearboxes are a lot more fun to drive IMO. I'm never considering buying an AT/AMT/CVT becaise they feel dumb. In a manual gearbox your shifting efficiency is a matter of your skill. In an automatic one it's a matter of the algorithm that you can not really improve or make versatile enough for all conditions. The manual mode of ATs/AMTs is rather for locking in lower gears for bad terrain, using it while driving makes shifting even dumber.
Talking about radio, radios used to be not only with two knobs but also with one knob or buttons only. The two knob layout however has become my favorite one as well.
There is no need to install a color touchscreen in a car as well. It's too small for cinema and too offset for navigation. Most people still prefer using their own smartphones for navigation and there is no better place for it than on a windshield so that you can keep your eyes on the road. So IMO the whole infotainment system is completely useless while driving.
"we don't need windshields anymore" ...... Don't give them ideas.
Oh they're already _all_ over that idea. They've been talking about it for *_years_*
EDIT: Formatting
Probably somewhere they are already designing a car that has no windows it will be like spacecraft from some science fiction shows or games where vessels don't have windows and use cameras instead to project the illusion of windows. One game says windows are structural weaknesses, which in some cases they are but being able to look out a window is good for someone's sanity well unless your neighbor is a nudist and a horrible looking person in the nude or a Bernie supporter then you don't bother.
@@02091992able There was a concept car I remember from someone I remember some time ago, with complete auto pilot and big monitors rather then windshield so that you can watch movies which your intelligently stupid car is hurtling on the freeway at 100MPH ready to shred into pieces.
😂😂 that's true.
Apple will be the first to do that!!!
The ever growing window "shoulder." I'm a modest 5'6", and I can't put my arm on a windowsill anymore because the shoulders are too high up. This also contributes to terrrrrrible visibility around the car, which necessitates cameras and sensors all around the car, which means more cost, failure, and even more cost.
Im the same height and that is why i bought a 95 civic, I fucking love that little car with its 5 speed manual
I'm 6' and can't do that either comfortably on most cars these days. Even my BRZ gives a tinkling feeling on my arm after a short period of time
That is mostly due to side impact and rollover standards, a few cars manage to get a lower beltline these days. The Honda Accord and Subaru Legacy both still have exceptional visibility.
@@mrvwbug4423 Yep most older vehicles are death traps so this is one modern annoyance that makes sense. I still hate it. Love resting my arm on the window but I never do it in my new car since its so uncomfortable now.
Its because you're a Manlet. If you were the size of a man, you wouldnt have that problem
Here in Canada they are cracking down on distracted drivers. Now you can't even adjust the heater/Ac without being distracted by looking at a stupid screen. Bring back good old fashioned knobs and dials that you adjust without distraction!
A knob would be the same distraction but get a car that does both
Gives them a chance to up the 'perceived quality' by making nice feeling analogue controls. I much prefer a nice feeling clicky switch or smooth dial than an iPad menu screen you have to look at when you should be looking at the road
Distracted driving here in manitoba as of nov 1, now gets you a $672 fine, 5 points against your license and an automatic 3 day license suspension (im sure thatll be challenged)
I 100% agree, touch screens are incredibly distracting because you can't feel what you're doing. Why would car manufacturers think doing something that takes people's eyes of the road is a good thing?
I'll give a parallel example here from the world of music synthsizers. From the late 80's onwards they started moving sound controls from physical knobs to screens, and menus. Peeps thought this was cool until they realised it takes much longer to sculpt your sound, but also you can't just grab a couple of knobs and change two things at once, or change sound parameters easily during live performance. Now things are going back strongly to "the old ways" with a physical control per function. It's just better. There's a difference between "easy to learn" and "easy to use"..
I love my 90s cars, they have non of the issues you list. Reliable, phenomenal controls, great sound, and engaging.
Agreed. I wish they were safer in collisions, though.
@@mtsixspeed old Volvo wagons and Benz’s are built like tanks, but I get your point though.
Rip MPGs
@Ed Findlay yeah but those cars are more or less approaching 30 years old and regular driving does wear pretty much everything out
That's a real car!
Not being able to get certain options on anything but the base or the top trim. Some examples: a manual available only on a base model with the weakest engine. Or having to buy the top trim to get navigation or sunroof.
harrismi7 dealerships can only hold but so much inventory, but I agree--more options should be offered when factory ordering
This sir is why i love me my jeep wranglers and honda cars
Agreed, looked up the new Colorado and was kinda excited to see a manual offered, but that dissipated pretty quickly when I found it was offered only on the base RWD model with NO OTHER OPTIONS. Any other option added and you lost the manual.
This could be solved if we can order straight from the manufacturer.
A/C or Radio on a touchscreen is an accident waiting to happen.
They already doing it sadly :(
@@PratikHerur Two I will never buy !
Definitely. I rented a Volvo for a weekend trip and I can’t explain how difficult it is to nativate through the touch screen menu while driving. It’s a good thing my gf was pasanger, otherwise I’d have to pull over every time.
The stupidest thing is to take things that pull your attention off the road into a car. Knobs turn right hot, left cold, right vol up, left vol down, up arrow increase, down arrow decrease...i returned a high end stereo because everything is touch screen and you cant feel where your hand is and have to remember the different screens so you don't have to look down...replaced with less futuristic looking but more driver safe touch screen and real button stereo
Tesla has windshield wiper settings on a touchscreen,
If you think molding the dash around a screen is more expensive then you don't really understand manufacturing. Making a cutout for a screen on a dash is simple, I know since I work at a place where we have manufactured dashes for trucks, lifters and other industrial equipment. Me adding a cutout for a screen on a piece that already needs milling is nothing and takes 10sec extra in manufacturing. In fact, having it stuck on/sticking out ADDS materials and cost with housing and whatnot.
The reason car manufacturers put a screen on the dash that sticks up is so that it is closer to your sightline. If it sticks out/up, then all you need to do is glance to the side to see the screen. If its moulded into the dash, you will have to look down and take your eyes of the road. And since it's primarily touchscreens nowadays, molding it into the dash puts it further away from you, possibly forcing you to stretch for it to use it.
In short, there are many reasons for having the screen stick out of the dash, cost savings is not one of them.
Thank you. Funny anybody saw these reasons you stated.
Totally misleading cheap line
I literally came to comment this, then realized you commented it. I love it when he called it cheap and no thought going into it. Funny that the best German engineered cars have the dash line stuck out screens. Idk? Maybe it has to do with the fact that it’s ergonomically better and safer. *eye roll* this guy obviously doesn’t do very much research when making his videos
Ya I came here to say that as I have a 2019 kia forte where they put the screen in. I actually love how it's set up.
FaintAcrobat preach it dude this guy acts like he knows more than everyone else and is kinda full of himself
They still suck, though...
They look aftermarket and cheap compared to every well designed integrated screen, they are more easily damaged (which I can prove) and attract more unwanted eyes (which statistics from european insurances and polices prove)...
Man this video still holds up. Everything is on point in 2023. Well done.
Piano black 😡
Hhhhhh, i was searching for your comment.
I am the 1998 lexus ls400 guy, who sold it and moans about it till now, lol
TheStraightPipes Sorry, but I love piano black. Makes interior feel upscale. Many of us like it; we just don’t yell about it all the time. I don’t really notice the fingerprints. And when I do, I just wipe ‘em off with a soft lens cleaning cloth, no cleaners or solutions necessary. Takes about 20 seconds. By this logic, should we get rid of shiny paint on exteriors, too? After all, flat, non-glossy colors would hide a lot more and clean up WAY faster. 🙄
@@Saboda53 team Yuri. Lol
I’m going to replace the touch points in your house with piano black jakub. Starting with a piano black toilet seat.
@@Saboda53 what about piano black makes an interior feel upscale? I'm genuinely asking for your opinion
I'll always prefer a knob. A driver's vehicle needs something less visual requiring and more feel. I can reach down a turn a knob without looking and know what it does. These computer screens will break or get slow and these cars are not made to last
1st knob all the way right
2nd knob all the way left or right
3rd knob all the way left or right
2 seconds
and hydraulic power steering.
I know this is not a comment where it’s meant to make you laugh. But I fucking died, “I can reach down and turns knob without looking and I know what it does”
“I’ll always prefer a knob,”
Not to mention that these screens are pretty much outdated after a certain period of time.
I liked it when the dash was faced towards the driver. When everything was close and actually made sense.
Ahhh, the 90s!
So Right you are the one who is meant to be driving
@@blackduck5054 just wait a few more decades, soon it'll be the car is meant to be the driver, and interior designs will be nothing more of a screen for music selection and temperature.
These days you can do almost everything with the steering wheel buttons, you also might need an engineering degree to figure out your steering wheel haha
That would be a Corvette C7.
3yrs later & this guy just described 90% of vehicles manufactured. I specifically looked for a vehicle that didn’t have a tacked on info screen, regular door handles, descent sized tires, naturally aspirated & tactile controls (knobs/buttons) for most of the interior controls, no piano black surfaces & no fake exhausts. I found it with the GR86. It does have the pipes in sound, but I can disable it.
Wow someone that actually mentions the security risk of wireless ethernet in a car! This guy keeps showing much underrated and underappreciated he is and easily deserves more subs. Keep it up man you're doing us car people justice!
Cia hijacked a journos car and killed him, late model mercedes, drove him into a pole
Every "SUV" these days is nothing but a fat Hatchback
qrt rt lol
I love my Subaru Crosstrek even if it's basically a lifted Impreza. Meh. I'm never going back to a sedan and I never want a low vehicle again that drags its bumper and fender over the road.
@@CheapSushi I'd say it's more like an Outback the got smooshed 30%, haha.
fat and lifted hatchbacks
For fat people
When did trucks become luxury?.. I just want to dump a load rock in the bed.. now I've gotta wait 3 minutes for the tailgate to lower.. it's a truck, not an office.
Bingo! Trucks nowadays are done up like a Maybach. Who is going to get into one with muddy workboots, or, put dirty overalls on those fine, heated leather seats? They're too nice (and fragile) for what they were built for (and, what the commercials show). Trucks are supposed to be rugged, utilitarian, work vehicles. That is part of the appeal of driving one. Folding vinyl bench seat, roll up windows, maybe a cup holder. Cheap, tough, and, good for hauling, and, getting dirty. Now they seem to be made for people with Gucci workboots, Chanel tool belts, and, Armani coveralls.
@@eat_a_dick_trudeau exactly my point, haha.. a panoramic sunroof?... In a truck?.. SMH!
Why did you buy a truck with a powered tailgate? Even then, its not opening a portal to Mordor so why is it taking 3 min?
You create your own problem and then wanna bitch about it smh.
@@eat_a_dick_trudeau All the truck makers make basic utilitarian trucks with all the things with suggested available for purchase for brand new. RAM even makes a plastic seat version (tradesman). What are you specifically complaining about? That some people have the option of spending 3x what you spend? How and why does that chap your balls?? If trucks were ONLY available in $60k models with maybach features as you put it, then you'd have a case. But till then, Jesus Christ stop bitching about things that have no bearing on your needs.
If anything you should be happy because the people paying 60k for their grocery getter soccer mom truck with 22" rims are subsidizing the cost of the basic 25k utilitarian that you and I buy!
@fukthegoog Ah I see. Interesting point sir. However I just jumped on Ford's Build a F150 on their site and seems its pretty simple to add the FX4 package for only $770 which adds the HDC and locking rear to their lower XL Mid trim. You can add 4x4 to that same lower XL Mid trim.
Granted I took two seconds to look into this so what I missing here?
FX4 Off-Road Package
$770 S4
Add
Optional on XL Mid, XLT, LARIAT, King Ranch®, and Platinum 4x4.
Includes:
• 3.31 Electronic-locking rear-axle with 5.0L V8 engine or 3.5L V6 EcoBoost® engine
• 3.55 Electronic-locking rear-axle with 2.7L V6 EcoBoost® engine
• 4x4 "FX4 Off-Road" bodyside decal
• Hill Descent Control™
• Off-road tuned front shock absorbers
• Skid plates: fuel tank, transfer case, and front differential
he presents "the worst trends" with probably the greatest enthusiasm I seen him with. he glows
commie
Electric parking brake! This is a feature that must die. When the battery is dead you have nothing. If your brakes fail, you have a brake that locks the brakes only.... Instead of a hand brake you can actuate to hopefully slow the car.
A parking brake is also called "emergency brake" for a reason. Although they seem to forget that reason. Also, it should be a HAND brake not a "second foot brake"
Except that all cars have multiple brake circuits which don’t need power to work.
Nope, I love the electronic parking brake and am looking forward to having that feature on my next car. Sorry, I'm too old to be doing handbrake drifts and how often does your battery actually die anyway? I suppose on a MT I'd prefer a regular handbrake right behind the shifter, but in a luxury car I damn well EXPECT to have an E-Brake switch on the center console.
Brake failure is so rare as to be pretty much nonexistent these days.
Back in the 80s we had a 7 ton Ford flatbed and if you lose power that brake will not disengage. I can't believe they would try that tech again.
For the people in hurry;
1. Fake Engine Noise 0:35
2. Electronic Door Handles 01:42
3. Stuck on Info Screens 02:38
4. Over-Complicated Tech 03:30
5. Infotainment 04:50
6. Oversized Wheels and Tires 06:18
7. Piano Black Gloss Plastic and Plastic Chrome 07:29
8. Turbo Everything 08:25
9. Fake Vents and Exhaust Tips 09:45
10. Truth in marketing and advertising 10:28
Thank you.
Χρειάζεσαι πολύ περισσότερα like για αυτό
@@xatzpskl Ωραίος 👌
Thank you so much
Actually this is prob the one time I didn't care for an outline. It's a short enough video =)
Headlights are so ridiculously bright. Like no one else is needs to see!
ridingincircles I have off-road lights and I flash people i see with brights on only to realize they’re not brights at all
@@RUSTYCHEVYTRUCK I know it's insane. I am a few days away from turning 40 and thought I was just getting old man eyes. I had a co-worker confirm that the lights are out of hand. But he is also getting on in years too...wawaaaa
I made this same reply to another response above... A tip for you .... My dad taught me this and I recently told this to my son, who's learning to drive. If the glare from the oncoming traffic is too much and you can't see, try looking down to the right at the curb, side of the road, shoulder etc. Normally, the glare is temporary as you mentioned. This is not the best, but better than guessing where the road is :)
And LED taillights in some cars, like Cadillac. Plus many headlights do not properly illuminate the correct area or the side as per the insurance institute.
LOOKING AT YOU TOYOTA!!!
Oversized front grills
*BMW, Mercedes and Cadillac start sweating profusely*
Audi should take a note
@@codycampenella8824 Don't forget about Lexus.
@@poncho828 Lexus grills are the absolute worst part of their cars.
wooster yes! And 3/4 of the grill is blocked off and doesn’t even take in air....
How about front bumpers being replaced by oversized grills. Toyota is leading the way on this.
@howtobebasic1 No they won't. They'll love it. That's how they make money. Owners will hate it.
Paul Ng pedestrian safety laws have gotten pretty tough
Nope, just look at the BMW X7. Thr grill looks like a piggy nose that sniffed an X5 while picking it's nose.
Paul Ng Toyota is now selling grills on wheels...Lexus isn’t too far behind either
I think the gigantic grills are just so ugly. There's got to be a better way to protect pedestrians and give protection for the car as well.
Along with electronic door handles, throw in "removing physical locks/keyholes".
Leanid that’s actually a good thing, it’s quicker and easier to use...
Most of the time, yes. But a lot of these complaints are directed at cars out of warranty. Say you have a hatchback or an SUV, used. The key fob is out of batteries, and there is no interior lever to open the hatch. You need a key, yes? Most cars don't have them on the rear hatch at all, except those few that have no electronic windows/locks package on a trim level (the Chevy Spark LS is the only one that comes to mind). Also, you can have electronically controlled locks that allow you to use a key as a backup, but manufacturers have moved away from that.@@000darkorbit000
agreed, what happened to a button fob.
Surprisingly my VW Passat has a cover over the key lock in case the key fob doesn't work.
with BMW's system, the key never runs out of battery.
Its charging while inside the slot.... never had any problems with it.
Abolish Chevy ads. And anything Jeep makes now.
God yes
I’d buy the Gladiator. If they put a big V8 in it. But they didn’t.
And Ford's I mean come on. There all bs
C Steele Ford isn’t bad. Chevy is obnoxious and just go way overboard with their “not real actor” people and JD power awards
Jeep is pretty nice to be honest, what's wrong with them?
As long as the volume knob is physical, I’m good. I don’t want to navigate through 6 different menus while driving just to turn the volume down.
I might add: "Windows are getting smaller and smaller, especially the windows to the back and sides." There must have been an immense rise in glass prices...
@@baums547 Yes and crash safety is a thing when you can't see what's going on outside because your windows are so small... :-/
I thought it was because of the fuel efficiency standards. That they're trying to make cars more and more aerodynamic. Also, that's why every car is pretty much starting to look the same. Not sure if this is true, but it seems to make sense at least. Either way, fuck the government and car manufacturers too
@@richiemandina5305 It has nothing to do with aerodynamics, having larger windows doesn't impact that unless you change the shape of the cabin.
It's because modern safety regulations require a cars fortified impact zone meet a certain height, and that pillars be of a certain strength (achieved with thicker posts) for increased safety in a rollover. Also only a certain percentage of a cars surface area is allowed to be glass. This is all to prevent people from getting crushed in a rollover and having less of their skin be shredded by flying glass.
@@eyegrinder94 I mean, you may be mostly right about all that, but how could you believe that aerodynamics has nothing to do with it at all? Cabin shape clearly has a lot to do with aerodynamics. That's why you don't see many SUV's sitting up high, with steep windshields like they used to have. Now they have these huge windshields that are nearly horizontal, and ugly cabins and dashboards that are designed to accommodate this new shape. And if you're looking to cut through the air easier, wouldn't that obviously include making the cabins more squat, consequently reducing the space for windows? I'm not saying it's not about safety, but I think it's silly to assume it's not affected in the least by the pursuit of more aerodynamic vehicles for higher MPG's
@@richiemandina5305 Fair point. What I meant was rather that cars in the past got around the visibility issues while maintaining excellent aerodynamics because they were able to use more glass and thinner pillars. They can't do that anymore, so when they had to meet both safety and efficiency standards, visibility is what they sacrificed. I guess it's a combination of both, sorry if I seemed like a jackass or something.
They forgot the biggest one which is replacing a hand brake with a button
Right
I have such a button, and I wouldn't want a car without anymore. It comes on when I stop and turn off the car, and when I want to drive, it turns off. Very comfortable. I love it. The only reason why I would want a regular handbrake is to let the back slide, but that doesn't happen too often.
Right, a solution to a problem that never existed.
the handbrake was supposed to be the one thing that wasn't going to fail.. and now its an electronic button
@@kadajawi6567 get a tesla
New Chevy Blazer has a 21 wheel choice. You should see how people react when you tell them how much a winter tire costs for a 21" wheel.
Lmao i know, it's hilarious. My gf has a Mazda 6 GT with 19" wheels, luckily I'm no dumby and got 17" steel wheels with the proper sized tire to match the stock tires for winter.
@@benutzername100 that's utterly INSANE i can buy a 35" tire for 350$ with a 17" rim. Big wheels is stupid. On most cars, 17" wheel is more than enough.
@@benutzername100 yea i can believe it. Taxes are a sin lol.
My 2019 Toyota Camry XSE had 19” wheels. Replacing a tire cost $300!
@@flagovhate Yeah I have a 2017 Mazda 6 GT and it was about a grand to buy a set of 19” winters. I do enjoy a firmer ride quality and that’s my personal preference but to people that don’t care I would recommend doing some research before you get sticker shock on tire prices.
Touch screens drive me bonkers, they're starting to implement laws that prohibit driving and using your phone and then turn your car controls into a phone. I realize that voice control is becoming a thing, but nothing beats physical buttons for quick, essential functions.
to me, infotainment systems are completely useless. They are way too distracting, laggy and useless. If I want to use maps I'll use google maps on a phone stand. If I want to use my phone, phone stand again. I'd prefer to have a good set of high quality speakers, an aux port, a bluetooth system (to make calling easier). I don't want a radio either, I just don't use them. I prefer a car to look luxurious without all the stupid screens put on. I think luxury cars nowadays are absolutely gorgeous if only we can remove those stupid screens. In fact, I can go all day long about stupid standard options on a car. I wish that it was possible to just choose literally every useless option on your car (except for standard things like cruise control, air conditioning, air bags, esc, tsc). But of course no manufacturer wants you to pay less money.
@@ha_ha-ha_ha
Android auto is a thing. Beats using the phone and killing its battery.
@@2010ngojo that kind of complication and increase in weight is what I do not want. I never found using apple carplay and android auto to ever beat using my phone. A charging socket or USB would be good enough for me if that is the problem. But even then, my phone battery is fine and I always know how to manage it. I never leave with a dead battery. I don't wan to compromise my driving experience and the interior look of my car with a bunch of screens that will look dated in a few years just to show my phone on a slightly larger screen.
@@ha_ha-ha_ha
I use my phone for streaming audio. I am not putting more wear on the battery and use GPS for a long time does that.
Add weight? Like what, 10-15 pounds at most? That's nothing. And the larger screens help greatly with visibility. You say you don't want to get distracted, and yet you use a phone with a smaller screen. Ironic, really.
...plus you can upgrade your phone and its apps much more easily/cheaply. Once your car hits 5-10 years old that infotainment system will be ancient. What are you going to do? Buy a whole new car?
A/C and radio in a laggy screen
Electronic parking, emergency brake and for handles
No physical keys
Gross... physical keys? Don’t you know Apple CarKey will let you start your car with NFC on your phone?
Also, who uses the radio anymore? It sounds like shit, has ads and you have no control. Electronic parking isn’t even the only option when it’s there either.
@@DavidRamirez-vc8dr u must don't know how to drive
Dre Mill for what reason would you want to carry physical keys when a phone is always with you and better in every way? Apple Car Key will work even after the battery is depleted if you set it up like that. Someone can easily steal your key, but if someone steals your phone they gotta steal your finger or face. More convenience, more secure, less heavy pockets, no keys scratching. 🤷♂️
@@DavidRamirez-vc8dr How will the doors unlock with no power to the lock actuators exactly?
The overall worst trend is the SUV/CUV craze, and how sedans/coupes are being discontinued.
I fucking agree ....i got an 2018 impala i would not trade it for an suv
Michel Linschoten my fiancé has a 2016 impala and he hates that they’re fazing it out. It’s a good car.
Spot on. I think Ford has really screwed up on the cancellation of their sedans. Lets sit back and watch gas climb back up & watch the auctions load up with used SUV crap. I love the mom and 1 small kid in a big ass SUV.
Add they are all the same and all fucking ugly.
I absolutely Despise SUV's ! .... Sick of all the added tech in recent years... black boxes, event data recorders, how so many cars look boring and alike, and the rarity of manual transmissions.... Sold my '01 BULLITT.. 1st year of EDRs in Mustangs... and just got rid of my 2 yr old, 2017 124 spider due to all the tech... I priced probable replacement parts it might need in later years one day out of curiousity .. a heater control module... $1100 !!!.. No more modern cars for me.. I am now driving my classic cars as my daily drivers... '65 Corvair vert.. '66 Corvair Coupe w/AC, and my '68 Sprite... Loving it.. A lot more FUN !.. and.. $60/mo full coverage total, for all 3 combined... no mileage limits.. going to sell one of the Corvairs, and replace it with either an MGB, Supercharged or with V6 V8 swap, or find a nice low mile TR8 roadster.....
5 years later and still we are there...every your words are so true. I fear it won`t change anything soon...
Having heater knobs in infotainment should be outlawed.
We don't use mobiles and drive so why should we go through 7 menus just to turn the heater up.
Just naw!
I use the infotainment controls almost exclusively for the HVAC in my car. I don't think I've ever actually used the redundant physical buttons once. The radio controls I use the on-wheel buttons almost exclusively.
Exactly!
I'm surprised this video isnt 45 minutes long
Good things come in small packages.
It should be. I'd watch it. :)
Don't want a brain attack thank you
@@youtubasoarus so would I, I could go on about how much modern cars suck for about as long
BOOM! One hundredth thumb up. You're welcome :D
1997 NSX Engineer: You eliminated the pop up headlights?
2017 NSX Engineer: Right, the mechanism was heavy
1997 NSX Engineer: What do your batteries and 3 auxiliary motors weigh?
2017 NSX Engineer: 1000 lbs give or take
Lol that's funny
(To joykill though, pop-up headlights were actually made illegal due to pedestrian collision concerns, though I find it ironic how American cars were some of the last to use them (Corvette and Trans Am)
lol, but it also aerodynamics.
aerodynamics benefit from properly designed pop ups, in fact pop ups can double as air brakes
God I hate pop up headlights
Ian Fitchett what are you doing here
I really, REALLY appreciate and respect the approach of being highly skeptical and deeply critical without a trace of anger or bitterness. Just... thank you.
Man the fake vents must be the absolute worst ..
You already cut the hood, put a real vent!
@@unloveableandre It's useless, a real vent will have more drag and let dust and water in.
would a real vent be a fake-fake vent?????
I think the fake exhaust gets on my nerves more than the fake vents! I am looking at you Mercedes and Audi.
Buick did it for years .it's just bling
But the worst part is... People love all of this!
I Know right, bloody idiots.
hahahaha so true
I love most of them. I think fake tips look great, fake noise sounds good, also love big wheels. Turbos I’m not a fan of.
the sad turth is that people who bring in the money are not car enthusiast, but at the same time cars have become such a status symbol that everyone has to have the latest and greatest, if you want an example of this look at suvs, they are selling like hot cakes and they are litteraly designed for no one, offroad enthusiasts don't like them, sporty car enthusiast don't like them, people who are about practicality don't like them, yet they still sell them
@@RulZGame I like the turbos and hate everything else
Removing the manual transmission option in general, or those that still have it, limit the manual to the base trims. I'd like a manual in the highest trim tyvm.
Mikey R I’m sure you and all 12 other likeminded individuals across the continent would be enough to justify the millions spent importing and/or developing a separate drivetrain.
That what I love about Mini, they still offer a manual in any trim. I got mine fully optioned out with a 6 speed.
@@yufengliu9054 If it ain't manual, I ain't buying it. I'm not interested in cars that come equipped only with passenger seats.
Will never buy an automatic piece of shit!
J O With all things considered, I think one can safely argue that manual cars feel more fun, and is more engaging. That’s the reason why these people, and myself as well, want them. But at the same time, it is so easy to see how little of the market we represent once you start comparing the many usage scenarios of vehicle by weighting them with their frequency. After which, it’s just a simple question of why should a company treat each scenario as equal when people experience some (I.e. commuting) more than others?
Soft closing doors takes away the feeling of having a car imo. I love that "thump" or "clunk" sound when I close my doors but sadly its disappearing nowadays
you mean the fact that the car literally shakes from the door closing
G wagon door sounds like bank vaults! 🥰
@@UltraLowSpec He didn't say slam them like a gorilla.
Stupidly, dangerously bright low beam headlights on new cars - as mentioned several times.... are there not specific standards from SAE for headlight brightness and beam pattern, so as not to blind oncoming drivers? What happened to these standards? We had the technology to put aircraft landing lights on cars back in the 1960s, but there was a very good reason it was not done... blinding other drivers!!!
This
HAHAHAHA NI-PISSING!!!
Cry babies.
The crash test people started rating headlights like last year or so. Maybe we will see change in the future. Another person's bad vision is no excuse to burn other people's retinas
Actually many brands have toned it down by using led lights. Most will only project to a certain height aswell. The german cars were horrible bout it in the 2000s. Also people get after market lights like me so i can blind those jackasses who dont use their low beams so ive got halogens and leds to blind ya back when i flip by brights on.
My car showed up three times and it’s making me uncomfortable 😂
Lol
Buyer beware 😂
Which car is it?
@@hedgehogthesonic3181 lol was the 10th gen civic, moved on to a WRX now though
@@connorwalls. good move. Not that the Civic is a bad car either.
@@8.4_litre_V10 had so much fun ion that car, 250hp feels like 500 in those things
Mini SUV they are basically Hatchbacks with little wider bodies.
Minus any of the practicality of an actual SUV.
@@playloud247 Exactly
Crossover in general are a stupid trend but those micro SUVs are the stupidest of them all like the Suzuki ignis smh
playloud247 Not necessarily. My Subaru crosstrek is much cheaper than a normal suv, and can fit my drum set, hardware, and cymbals with a passenger seat to spare.
@@ardemgourdikian1394 just get a wagon
"Maybe they should pour more money into reliability than gimmicks"
But gimmicks are what people see.. and what sells... Nobody expects car to last long (because that hurts polar bears apparently)
Yeah recycling cars is bad let’s just make everything disposable
Literally touched on everything on my list. Absolutely HATE the lack of physical buttons! TY for making this video 💟
I like redundancy and always appreciate a car that has BOTH on-screen buttons for all features as well as physical buttons for stuff like HVAC controls.
I like knowing exactly where every button and dial is located, so I don't have to take my eyes off the road to adjust the heat or change the radio station or volume.
Fake vents are sooooooo cheeeesy! With the stinger, they are so not needed.
Toyota supra 2020 = many fake vents!
I think they look cool!
Sin,
1999 Mustang GT!
I woulds rather have fake hood vents than none at all-looks too plain.
I buy used cars, good luck selling these cheesy cars with fake vents. Your resale value is going to suck!
Fake vents make the car look cheap in my opinion.
How about paddle shifters on cars with CVT transmission? But it's the sport model! That kills me.
It's all about image. Sort of like seeing ground effects appendages hanging from some sedans and Ricers even though the car is too high from the ground to have any appreciable effect.
what car specifically are you talking about?
@@MrNothingButAir There are a lot.. Subaru does it on quite of few of their models, Nissan Altima SR, Sport model Honda Civics, and plenty others. Some other CVTs alternatively have +/- on the gearbox (what that is called escapes me...), also fairly pointless. I don't mind a Sport driving mode on a CVT, but it's plain silly to have paddle shifters.
Pretty useless and pointless
cvt is akin to power without having to go through the gears !
this guy made my day
because i have an older car which contains non of these elements
now im proud of my car
At least you own your own vehicle
Hard to choice new car with all that junk in it.
I drive a 2008 Infiniti M35X and the infotainment center is very easy to use and I love it despite the fact it shows it’s age.
I love my 88 Eldorado. Yeah, it has a few cheap interior bits, but it's really bare bones otherwise. Electric seats and windows are the cars "luxury" features. It also has a neat on board diagnostics system, but it is really easy to understand and not poorly implemented into the dash.
Honestly, if the reliability and power of Cadillacs HT family of engines was better, it would be a pretty damn nice little coupe.
I bought a Lada made in Russia.
On the inside it look like a car from the 90's but it was build in 2017
A channel that doesn't try to please everyone, how refreshing.
Looking forward to your 57 hour video on over complicated tech :)
This is why I like my 370z. The only infotainment I need is my phone plugging into the car
Almost every dashboard lights up with the headlights off. I see more people driving without headlights on at night than ever before.
Accomplice Rex Most cars have auto lights these days
Yep. See it every night... Front daytime running lamps on, totally black at the back
I think it's the "auto" switch.
YES! Every night I see at least 12 newer model cars with no headlights on
Same, but usually I see it around the airport area in rental cars. Tourists lol
And what’s with new car commercials that hardly show you the actual car!
1) They all look about the same except the front grill.
2) They are ugly if you take a good look.
They blare on and on about financing, deals, etc.
Absolutely no information about the actual fucking car
THIS. When I was a kid, car commercials showed the car, its engine, talked about how fast it was, what it could do, and the standard features it had. And it made you feel connected with the brand, and proud of what you owned.
How anyone with a new car will ever feel that way about the brand or car is beyond me. They all look the same, and do the same things. Its all just a bunch of carbon copys rolling around with different badges and brands slapped on. That reason alone has kept me from purchasing anything past the year 2001 for the last decade.
Ken Smith Well the cheaper brands definitely ARE ugly. the more expensive brands however even thought they look about the same, many of them are beautiful.
@@LrulestheworldM8 Dodge seems to have no problem showing off their cars, specially the performance ones. Their entire twitter is full of proud owner pictures of Challengers and Chargers.
The omission of spare tires!!!!!!!
YES
Especially in an SUV wtf does it need a space saver for
Exactly!
I have Two, 2 seater older cars that somehow found room for an inflated donut spare but, my 2017 minivan can't find the room for a spare?
Even the Optional spare was one that had to be inflated? (To get the spare I would've had to delete another feature).?
To be honest: I've been driving for 41 years and only 1 time ever did I need a spare. And it was in the parking lot of an apartment I rented. Now I don't put on 100K miles per year, but still....in 41 years of driving? And I've been driving my pickup on construction sites for 10 years which are prone to nails and screws all over the place....and not a flat yet.
i'm afraid that even wrangler can ditch full sizes in 20XX....
Thanks for being a solid straight shooter!!
Domestic and Foreign auto manufacturers are constantly trying to sale a gimmicky product and they don't care about it's longevity or software support.
It used to be the mechanics of a automobile determined when it was time to get rid of it, now it's electronics.
PCM, BCM and ECM on every modern car can cost thousands to repair and that may not be the end of your problems.
Electronics controlling your interior space can disable EVERYTHING to make the auto unlivable forcing you to strongly consider getting rid of it.
Take me back to the shade tree mechanic days when you could actually repair a car yourself.
The billing rate for a certified mechanic is about $140.00/hr in the North Texas area.
I can guarantee you nothing gets fix in one hour.
Every repair is high dollar.
Simple:
Too big.
Too heavy.
Too complicated.
Too many assisted systems.
mattmattmatt131313 sounds like all old ppl ever
Too big and too heavy come from government-mandated crash standards.
I would agree with every point except too big. I don't see that
Worst trend ever was making cars more expensive by adding more shiny plastic bits.
And crap that never gets used.
i dislike the trend of suv-ification. vehicles like the jeep renegade and chevy trax make me want to die. they have the cargo space and seat space of a mid side sedan, and all the downsides of suvs. Heavy, high center of gravity, huge expensive wheels and tires. Also i dislike how EVERYTHING HAS TO BE ALL WHEEL DRIVE. its so hopelessly unnecessary. It adds so much cost to the vehicles service, and upfront cost. plus people dont realize that awd only helps acceleration. steering and braking are needed too. A fwd car with snow tires will be one million times safer and more controllable in snow than a car with half worn all seasons with awd
AWD is so seductive to people. I do the build and price and feel as if I am missing out not selecting the AWD version. Even though I know better.
Don't forget how SUV-ification even ruined iconic names such as the Mitsubishi Eclipse and Chevy Blazer. When the new Blazer was announced everyone was hoping for a colorado-based competitor to the new Bronco, but instead we got dissapointed.
Justin Noker An eclipse coupe would make no money for Mitsubishi in today’s market I hate to say it but an SUV is a much better alternative
I love how people who likely don't live anywhere that it snows always bash AWD. A good AWD system does more than just get you going, it also helps cut down on under/over steer and generally gives more stable handling on snow and ice. Those crossovers like the Renegade also give you some extra ground clearance which can allow for some light off roading without the size or expense of a full blown 4x4 truck or SUV. You also now have a properly off road capable crossover in the form of the Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk, unlike the Renegade it is the real deal with a real low range, full skidplates, and a locking diff, I have one and it will go anywhere that any other stock 4x4 truck will go with the exception of a Wrangler.
@@f181234 that is fair enough given the market conditions, but my point is, did they seriously have to stick with the name Eclipse just to try to attract people that remember the old one? Literally, any other non-iconic name would have done
Interesting to watch again this video four years later, nothing has improved, it only has gotten worse.
The first UA-cam video for which I can find nothing to disagree with....
I disagree with more then half. I like pop out screens and the more cameras the safer. turbos are awesome and ive never had a repair problem with them.
Andres O He said remove the windshield and drive with JUST cameras.
Cadester22
Then buy a M1 Abrams then
@@andreso340
I disagree. Pop up screens look quite cheap and an afterthought. Looks like some ghetto Pimp My Ride shit.
fake vents and exhaust tips easily #1!
Those get a low priority from me because they don't get people killed. The "features" that get people killed need to go first.
@@kensmith5694 how is fake exhaust noise inside the car going to kill u😂
Jody same
It's no big deal when done properly, but yeah, on the Civic, it's just way too cheesy
So you're saying that Mugen Power Exhaust tip doesn't make my EV faster?
Gotta luv the error msg popping in @ 00:25 😇
I know, right?!? Do everything right and nobody notices it.. but one mistake stands out like a sore thumb... Hilarious. There is a feature on Windows 10 that holds out any notification when you're doing a presentation. Someone help this guy.. lol.
Top 5 annoying PC trends - 1. Notifications
Knowing him, he left that in on purpose. He works so hard on his editing, this gotta be intentional. So funny, saying he is a tech guy and knows stuff and the error comes on. The message is to not take all of it and his show so damn seriously.
@@fabianherrmann6398 I agree, he left that. The timing on it is perfect. It just pops in at the end of the shot and it's smooth. The guy is a genius!
@@ohc1492 I only wrote that comment because iknew it wod get lots of thumbs up 😄 The error in itself dosent matter! 👍
This could be an annually revisited episode. Or maybe an awards show for the most egregious offenses.
Add the pop-up nanny/lawyer statement that shows up every time you start a vehicle. Even more annoying is that it stays there and won't let you close it until it's good and ready to go away.
the law statements are there because they don't wanna be bothered by getting sued by some moron. americans in particular are very sue happy, even in their own fault. so manufacturers take precautions.
Well, of course. There are reasons for all of the issues mentioned in the video - cost cutting, safety, etc. - that doesn't make them any less annoying.
I hated that. I coded/programmed by BMW to disable that when I turn on the car, along with the annoying seatbelt chime
@@jmartin2778 It's nanny overkill, agreed.
Electric parking brakes. Old ones look much better and more reliable
And more satisfying to hear the crunch as you pull up.
I also miss keyed ignitions and the pleasure of hearing the engine when I turn the key
@@stevethea5250 100% agree with you. I've had to rent a couple new f150s with this feature and hate it plus they are counter-intuitive, pull to engage push to dis-engage button vs. the old style peddle and how do I do a J- turn with one of those things. LOL
you also need a scan tool to release the parking brake fully to replace the rear brake pads
Another curse on the Land Rover brand... when that electric "hand"brake fails... you have a real problem!
While I can certainly do without the piped-in engine noise, I understand why. I owned a 2011 Mustang GT that had a sound tube coming from the intake and piped into the cabin. I thought it was terrible so I deleted it and was much happier. However, I read an article where a Ford engineer explained why they decided to do it. 1. They can't make the exhaust any louder because of EPA rules on sound pollution. 2. Everyone wants a quieter cabin these days to companies have added a lot more sound deadening material (which reduces any natural engine/exhaust sound heard inside the cabin). And 3....and this one is big. He stated that when under development, they had two identical Mustang GT's with the 5.0 and had people drive and rate them. Only difference is one had a sound tube and one did not. Every single person who drove both of them were sure the one with the sound tube was faster and more powerful. They were only told that the cars were different but nothing more. So, they liked the car better when they thought it was faster or more powerful. Kind of crazy but I guess Ford wouldn't have spent the time, energy, and resources to research and develop it if it didn't do something, right?
What EPA sound rule? Then how do you explain how loud the new Mustangs' exhausts are?
Sound tubes are not as bad as fake sound being played through speakers. I mean, that still is actual intake noise. Also, most people (ie same people that thought the louder Mustang is more powerful), do not even know or care about sound being played through speakers.
mrpmj00 the new mustang GTs have adjustable exhaust so that you can tune them to be loud on the track but in a residential area they can be in quiet mode or in normal to minimize sound...maybe that’s it?
Somebodies
thats bullshit. the F-type v8 sounds like a mp7 sub gun.
I think Mazda and Mercedes do the stuck on screen very elegantly
BMW too in my opinion
I agree , my best friend just bought a nice Mazda SUV & her screen looks very luxury & nice. It almost looks like you can have it go up & down lol
Hate it all. Toyota is probably the best one that does it, because at least they mold SOMETHING around the screen, other than that its just kinda stuck on there. Mazda, Kia, Mercedes, Genesis, Hyundai, BMW(this is the worst one imo) just dont look good
Mazdas are BITCHIN cool
@@FreshTillDeath56 ah, the Trumpesque “intelligent remark”. 😂😂😂😂
I've been working at a car wash for 4 years so I've seen a lot of cars and car trends. Every new "car" is an SUV now. I'm not talking big Tahoe SUV's, I'm talking lifted Subaru Forrester looking SUV's. Every single one looks the exact same from every company, they are indistinguishable from each other. It actually gets annoying having to clean the same car every time that just has a different logo slapped on it.
PlzReviveMeBro
Thank the government for over-regulating it. They use the same design because it meets the aerodynamics to help meet fuel standards.
Cars have looked indistinguishable from each other since the 1980s
I used to be able to id 99% of cars by silhouette, but not anymore. Anthing crossover or in the midsize SUV catagory is a blur.
One that sticks out to me is high beltlines. So many cars have the door sills so high that people's heads are barely peeking over, it's like you're sitting down really low.
Even the dashboards are really high with a super slanted front windshield that just feels awkward to look out of and judge the dimensions of your car. I can't count how many times I look in my rear view and see a brand new car with a woman's knuckles and a tuft of hair peeking over the steering wheel because the dashboard is so tall lol.
I liked that older cars, about 15 years ago and older had lower door sills, skinnier pillars, lower dashboards, longer hoods and trunks. I understand new cars have to conform to safety regulations and make the exterior based off wind tunnel tests, but it makes so many of these newer cars annoying to drive, and also visually unappealing imo.
This. The pillars are dangerous. Using a backup camera is a bandaid at best for the poor visibility out of them.
So much this. I can barely rest my arm on the window of some cars. I’m all for car safety but, I also ride a motorcycle. I guess I’ll just have to buy older cars.
I'm 6'2 and I can see further in front of me in my 1996 dodge dakota than in my 2021 volkswagen jetta. That's not good
You really nailed this list. Agree with every bit.
I complain about almost all of this regularly and my non car friends just look at me like... What?
Come on! Thanks for a great video.
_"I complain about almost all of this regularly and my non car friends just look at me like... What?"_ -- 802 Garage
Same experience here, even with occasional-car-enthusiasts.
@@commenterperson4481 Hahaha yeah it always surprises me what people tolerate because companies tell them to.
This is phenomenal! You touched on everything that irks me about modern cars, especially the performance cars (AMG’s, BMW M’s etc). One would think that these would be spared, but it is sadly not the case.
"We're just going to put 20 cameras on a car and then stick a screen in front of you so you don't have to look through glass." Car companies are taking notes right now and building a prototype on that idea right now because of you.
traingp7
It’s a reference to the movie Daybreakers
Tiny rear windows pointed up at the sky from the driver's viewpoint.
What?
that's one of my pet peeves too.....cars you can't see out the back window.....and blind spots everywhere
My mom's Renault Captur is nothing but blind spots, feels like I'm driving a convertible when I drive in my own Golf after driving the Renault
Or the driver window frame blocks your view when turning left (specifically my Volkswagen CC)
@@joheewrx5278 same with my 2002 BMW. the A pillars are so thick you have to move your head to see around them
I wish they'd get out of the business of infotainment altogether and just provide a slot for your smartphone and an interface app instead
so you can waste your wireless data instead of using a GPS that is built it. no thank you. I prefer to have option.
That sounds like Apple car play/Android auto
No it doesn't, any screen that the manufacturers make will be obsolete the day it comes out. We are better off putting our own devices in there
Wat? GPS doesn't use your wireless data link. You can put your phone in airplane mode and its GPS receiver will work. The smartphone weasels want you always connected but you don't have to be.
I'm not poor, unlimited data is a helluva thing
I HATE that every car manufacturer advertises their cars “drifting” around corners! I don’t want my vehicle to travel 80 mph SIDEWAYS!
I think the same if some car-reviewers are mad about cars that not good in drifting or dont have RWD. that shouldnt be a criterium at all espacially for people who just want to daily drive their vehicles
I don’t have to worry about the chrome plastic blinding me. I live in the UK
You guys dont have the sun in Europe? Hmm never knew that.
@@MikeHawk-tj3dzCertainly not frequently enough to cause issues!
@@MikeHawk-tj3dz not in that part of Europe
yeah you got the brilliance of the queen blinding you all yeah no shit !
😂
I personally hate the selection of new car "trims" being incredibly difficult to understand and comprehend. The Toyota 2019 Rav4 has an LE, XLE, XLE premium, XSE hybrid, adventure, and limited. Then on top of all of that they all have different packages within these five different trims. The XLE Premium grade weather package, Entune 3.0 JBL package, the entune with weather package, the entune with technology package, the entune with weather AND technology package.
To hell with this just give me 3 different trims with three different price points predominantly for what that car is stocked with. Because navigating the difference between your trims and packages require 4 different youtube videos and a tylenol.
Especially when they're just going to sell you whatever they happen to have on the lot anyway.
I totally agree with this! I wish a company like Subaru, for instance, would just simplify it. Put in everything, and all you do is pick the colors you want and whether you want cloth or leather. Just have each model based on size and segment be priced accordingly. That would be the best way to go about it. Either that, or literally just start with a base model, and people just simply add exactly what they want and then vehicle is produced to that spec. Of course, make sure the financing won't fall through, but that would work too. The industry just needs a change in the way they do business.
Toyota dealer employee here, one of the biggest stores in the midwest. I don’t mind the trims, but I do mind the shitty infotainment screens. It’s a known issue that the EnTune system, or whatever it’s called, has poor compatibility with iPhones (dating back to iPhone 6S) and we get lots of people complaining about how they can’t sync their phones - some even call them deal breaking and don’t get another for their next lease. They also crash, boot loop, and restart on their own during trips so frequently we have to diagnose it. We see it every day.
Electronic hand brake should be also on that list
why?
@@VortexGaming007 why would you want a whole electric system with 1000 components that can fail instead of a cable or hydraulic line?
Agree 100%, surprised more don't talk about this. I hate the modern E-brakes - we were doing fine with a lever, and it did not take up that much room if it was placed logically. The argument for them is that they save space, but this is nonsense. Toyota got it right in the 1990s - lever very close to drivers seat and out of the way of the arm rest and cup holder.
Totally agree. A proper handbrake helped me get out of trouble once. Snow and ice, on a country road I know well, so had already slowed down, turned wheel, car kept going straight, turned wheel a bit more, still going straignt and heading for the ditch. Used a bit of handbrake to lock up the back wheels for a moment and kick out the back end of the car, basically got the car drifting and avoided the ditch.
True, I also remember a friend of mine had his battery go flat and could not move the car as the handbrake (electronic) was stuck on! Car was in a dangerous position as well. There is an emergency release but we had to search for it - not everyone is going to know that in an emergency.
One of my favourite phrases when working on older vehicles: It's not loose, it's dynamic!
4 door "Coupes"
I feel sorry for those who have to sit in the back seat
@@InsolventGene Cars called shooting brake. Coupe station wagon.
What the heck is a Mazda rx8 then? That thing has 3 doors.
A 2+2 door sedan
Why? After owning 2 doors for years and dealing with huge heavy doors in parking lots and people trying to get in and out of the back I swore I’d never buy one again.
Four door cars look as good or even better than two door cars. It’s funny that often the two door cars people fawn over (Challenger, Camaro, etc) often look more pedestrian than many performance oriented four door sedans (E63 AMG, KIA Stinger, etc)