Visual Identities: More Than Just A Logo | Sagi Haviv | TEDxPenn

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 чер 2024
  • When it comes to designing a world-recognizable logo, Sagi Haviv is your man. He has developed branding and logo designs for clients ranging from international corporations to young start-ups to well-known non-profits. Haviv speaks about balancing the desires of clients with the fundamental principles of business and design-in order to get to a great design solution, it’s often important to say “no” to a client.
    Haviv is a partner and designer at Chermayeff & Geismar & Haviv. He teaches Visual Identity Design at The School of Visual Arts in New York City and coauthored the book Identify: Basic Principles of Identity Design in the Iconic Trademarks of Chermayeff & Geismar. Haviv has been a frequent speaker internationally and has served as a judge for the Art Directors Club of New York, the CLIO awards, and other competitions.
    This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at www.ted.com/tedx

КОМЕНТАРІ • 99

  • @leonardootazu4922
    @leonardootazu4922 4 роки тому +83

    “We think the logo as a flag”. Good comparison. I take it for my next client meeting. Excellent talk!

  • @AjaySNair
    @AjaySNair Рік тому +5

    Everytime a client doesn't understand our design, I send this link

  • @nathanmalik1697
    @nathanmalik1697 3 роки тому +48

    This man is a visual identity expert and an excellent storyteller as well! I enjoyed this and learnt a lot.

  • @SuperRadChad
    @SuperRadChad 5 років тому +100

    Good to see even at this level the clients still want to challenge years of expertise. Us designers think that at that level you don't get push back.

    • @johnpalacio_co
      @johnpalacio_co 5 років тому +10

      That's exactly what I thought.

    • @JavierAndresAnd
      @JavierAndresAnd 5 років тому +13

      It's kind of relieving and depressing at the same time

  • @benw9949
    @benw9949 4 роки тому +50

    That yellow rectangle of the National Geographic didn't just come out of nowhere, which is why it has an association that works. The old National Geographic magazines used to have that distinctive sunny yellow border, plus another border of scrollwork, and then the cover photo and type. Later, the scrollwork portion was dropped and they used only the yellow border, and then I think that was dropped. But at some point, videos (film and TV documentaries) made by them used that yellow rectangle and word mark, and over time, that logo design became the brand identity, so that the two used together now stand for the magazine, the videos and channel, and so on. The magazine dates back over a hundred years now. That logo works because there's that long association and that trust built up, and it's a simple, recognizable design.

    • @abirahmed1292
      @abirahmed1292 4 роки тому +4

      But the logo designer identified it, if they didn't hire logo designer then it would have been look like the conservation international logo

    • @AmieB2005
      @AmieB2005 3 роки тому +4

      Plus it emulates the distinctive proportions of the magazine. No magazine had that compact size as NatGeo.

  • @fabiancamargo5545
    @fabiancamargo5545 3 роки тому +14

    It was not the speech I wanted to hear, it was the one I needed to hear. Simply amazing

  • @ahmedmaher9985
    @ahmedmaher9985 5 років тому +54

    came here after the future eposide w\this dude such agreat man

    • @theaveragemegaguy
      @theaveragemegaguy 3 роки тому +1

      Same here, kinda funny because it’s like listening to the talk again he says everything almost identical to how he did on the futur lol. Much better on the futur tho still love him tho

    • @pishhugo7038
      @pishhugo7038 3 роки тому

      @@theaveragemegaguy same. the futur interview didnt have the funny vid towards the end tho

  • @Johnnymahon218
    @Johnnymahon218 3 роки тому +87

    Lesson here: hire a motion graphic studio to create an awesome video to sell your logo.

    • @evm6177
      @evm6177 3 роки тому +7

      😆 The whole Motion graphic with voice over was priceless. Loved the part where the O grows legs finally we r getting some where thought the client!

    • @johnshanahan8788
      @johnshanahan8788 2 роки тому

      *Shocking logo (Literally 6 Clicks to make...)

  • @wangfu1989
    @wangfu1989 2 роки тому +3

    I wish all the clients can watch this!

  • @BramNausDrums
    @BramNausDrums 5 років тому +336

    thefutur anyone?

  • @The.spiritual.sailor
    @The.spiritual.sailor 3 роки тому +5

    This man needs to be in hollywood 😃

  • @bambamovo
    @bambamovo 3 роки тому +9

    The worst thing a client says is "WOW ME" I say, you are not going to see a dove popping out of your screen ma'am.

  • @evm6177
    @evm6177 3 роки тому +5

    😆 The whole Motion graphic with voice over was priceless. Loved the part where the O grows legs finally we r getting some where thought the client!

  • @gerardovazquez6200
    @gerardovazquez6200 4 роки тому +5

    Haviv is a great thinker, the best

  • @shawj
    @shawj 3 місяці тому

    Goes to show that a great designer is not just good at design, but also at communication and persuasion.
    Doesn't matter if you have the best design in the world if the client rejects it.

  • @djlive408
    @djlive408 4 роки тому +4

    SAGI HAVIV is a god of marks! God Bless his knowledge!

  • @solie9598
    @solie9598 2 роки тому

    Wow! Best presentation I've ever seen

  • @okehammed
    @okehammed Рік тому

    A very insightful video laden with so much information about logo design and how to convince as well as presenting the logo to one's prospective client.

  • @designbyodo
    @designbyodo 3 роки тому +1

    Like A flag. Whether you want it or not. You love it and live with it. Trust the Designer.

  • @Abdullahfalah
    @Abdullahfalah 4 роки тому +1

    Such a brilliant thing 💙

  • @ohstayyeah
    @ohstayyeah Рік тому

    Best video about trust and logo design value

  • @YouSeeTruth
    @YouSeeTruth 3 роки тому

    Wow! A really good lesson here for a designer like me. Thank you so much

  • @madness5693
    @madness5693 4 роки тому +12

    Chris Do, sent me here XD

  • @intelegency2105
    @intelegency2105 3 роки тому +2

    Amazing ♥️

  • @AlexanderPrasetya
    @AlexanderPrasetya 5 років тому +1

    Awesome!

  • @user-ye1dz5dl9n
    @user-ye1dz5dl9n 6 років тому +1

    it's amazing

  • @abhishek0603
    @abhishek0603 5 років тому +11

    Kind of super enlightening.

  • @TechwithLaughter
    @TechwithLaughter 2 роки тому

    Great Talks

  • @OeloDickAble
    @OeloDickAble 4 роки тому +1

    I love you Sagi

  • @andryandriansyah2626
    @andryandriansyah2626 5 років тому +3

    I found what I was looking for.

  • @floppydisk9541
    @floppydisk9541 2 роки тому +5

    He didn't tell all about it. Even to make something simple like that, it's a hard work. I've tried. Coz it's not just shape but there's also philosophy behinds it.

  • @infographie
    @infographie Рік тому

    Excellent

  • @OeloDickAble
    @OeloDickAble 4 роки тому +6

    that swoosh had me like, LMAO

  • @tekalignmuse7745
    @tekalignmuse7745 Рік тому

    I have got a great insight.

  • @juliettehotel
    @juliettehotel 2 роки тому +1

    It’s hard to believe that between the client, the design firm, and the lawyers, not one person said, “Um, that’s the logo of the punk band, The Germs.”

    • @thecarrots5
      @thecarrots5 Рік тому

      They have a circle only. That's not even possible to trademark

  • @justinaez4029
    @justinaez4029 2 роки тому

    nghe mà ưng hết cả tai , đức phúc cover mãi đỉnh

  • @vijayarya9528
    @vijayarya9528 Рік тому

    Thank u all very much

  • @seltinusjulio
    @seltinusjulio 2 роки тому +4

    Siapa yang datang ke sini setelah nonton kanal Rio Purba?

    • @keongmania
      @keongmania 2 роки тому

      Hadir. Pernah nonton tapi nonton lagi karena bang Rio bahas.

    • @killdie6525
      @killdie6525 2 роки тому

      Saya

    • @floppydisk9541
      @floppydisk9541 2 роки тому

      Pnh liat krn penasaran dgn logo National Geographic. Trs dapet relomendasi di home dr rio purba.

  • @igcuric
    @igcuric 11 місяців тому

    Imagine how these environmental organizations flush millions in logos, marketing, celebrity events, directors' salaries, and so on, and how much really goes to the right places.

  • @balramyadav4950
    @balramyadav4950 Рік тому

    💌

  • @subhradipsaha9518
    @subhradipsaha9518 2 роки тому

    Sagi Haviv can play a role in Hitman!

  • @sparklinglotus
    @sparklinglotus 9 місяців тому

    Interesting how the title has nothing to do with what was said in the talk

  • @felipebechstedt4064
    @felipebechstedt4064 4 роки тому +3

    if logos gain power and meaning with time, why change them?

    • @spider161
      @spider161 3 роки тому +5

      The company changes and evolves as well sometimes. If there's a big shift in their goals and identity then it's usually time to update. See him talking about the conservation company, stayed the same until they moved from animals to all life so they made a logo that shows that.

  • @bluepersona7916
    @bluepersona7916 3 роки тому +4

    And clients dont understand all this things😩

  • @misterdcl650
    @misterdcl650 3 роки тому

    Haviv

  • @AlbertoFortes
    @AlbertoFortes 3 роки тому

    2020

  • @TheLastArcher
    @TheLastArcher 4 роки тому

    thefutur

  • @peterbutler9333
    @peterbutler9333 5 років тому +5

    I love this but don’t think the motion graphics piece is good at all. It cheapens the mark and the affects for the individual images creating the globe, dates it, it’s not new or innovative or creative. The logo is future reaching while the video is stuck in the past... in my opinion.
    Sagi, you’re the man. Thank you for this amazing insight!

    • @edoni93
      @edoni93 4 роки тому +4

      I totally agree with you and I hated the video but, you have to take into consideration that the motion graphics were done somewhere around 2010, when the logo was designed and at that time, that video was the norm. While on the other hand, it's so amazing to see that a logo designed at that time is still among the most innovative and simple logos of today, 2019.

  • @taringosutsuki5839
    @taringosutsuki5839 4 роки тому

    Im the real John Doe

    • @ofoc
      @ofoc 2 роки тому

      NO IM THE REAL JOHN DOE

  • @sundalongpatpat
    @sundalongpatpat Рік тому

    Daddy

  • @benw9949
    @benw9949 4 роки тому +3

    That circle and line logos way too generic and simple. It needs something more distinctive to work for that organization. A texture and something that suggests the Earth would be fore effective. I know what I'd do with it if it were up to me.

    • @evm6177
      @evm6177 3 роки тому +1

      Agreed! Looks like their whole strategy was saying NO until the client complied or they were shown the door, At which point these guys will call their lawyer friends just to show their muscle & family contacts that back their agency. Either way they won just saying no!

    • @aerialsky871
      @aerialsky871 2 роки тому +1

      Less is more

    • @bangtanbangtan8338
      @bangtanbangtan8338 Рік тому

      I don't think you got the point

  • @zamazalotta
    @zamazalotta 5 років тому +10

    you can sweet-talk it all you want but that O| logo sucks, especially for an organization with a distinctive mission

    • @aleksandergrygier540
      @aleksandergrygier540 5 років тому +16

      i must disagree - the logo helps the organization to consequently gain recognizability and it's biggest strength is it's simplicity making it instantly familiar. and the colors - they scream "earth" at you

    • @zamazalotta
      @zamazalotta 5 років тому +2

      @@aleksandergrygier540 rest assured a disk with a giant hole does NOT scream earth, maybe a donut, or a tire but definitely not earth...

    • @xChutJeReve
      @xChutJeReve 5 років тому +20

      graphic design is not like art, it has to communicate, be recognizable. You missed the whole point of the talk which is creating an abstract form to represent something... Like the chase icon. I can agree that it might not look pretty, or exiting (like their first logo) but it works. That's what's important.

    • @joshnolan722
      @joshnolan722 5 років тому +9

      It's not supposed to "scream" anything. It was *derived* from the concept of the blue planet, but it is meant to be versatile. The circle with a line below also resembles the silhouette of a person, and there's a lot of things a ring can be made to represent. But like he said, - as is true for Chase Bank, National Geographic, the Olympics, Audi, Pepsi, Mitsubishi, Adidas, etc. etc. - a logo has little to do with what it means or what it looks like. It's about familiarity and the idea that a company has a distinctive, recognizable logo - that when you see the symbol, the company comes to mind, and vice-versa.

    • @thejohnzapido
      @thejohnzapido 5 років тому

      @@zamazalotta exactly. It can have a lot of meanings. That's the power of it. Who knows, maybe in the future they will cater to tire industry or donuts. They have the powrer to be flexible. And that I think is the beauty of this symbol. A long term approach than an expressive and usually short term one. :)